FEATURE: Comedy in Music: Always Look on the Bright Side of Life

FEATURE:

 

Comedy in Music:

 

IN THIS PHOTO: The Monty Python boys

 

Always Look on the Bright Side of Life

________

WHEN one is approached with a ‘comedy song’, the reaction…

IN THIS PHOTO: The Streets (Mike Skinner)

is quite ironic. People might laugh: not in the way you’d anticipate. The reason for writing this was because, in my view, comedy is feeding more into music in the current day. There are two types of 'comedy songs'. The first is a more overt and deliberate attempt at comedy - I will come to some of the acts who write comedic music soon. The second type of humour is that which is laced into serious songs – mainstream artists and new acts. I’ll take the second group first because their brand of comedy can be subtler and less obvious. I am always drawn to music that has humour in and I think we need to embrace more artists who put comedy into music. These are troubling times so we could all do with a bit of a laugh. Looking at my record collection and there are a few artists who injected some great one-liners into the music. The Smiths, despite their rather morbid and cynical world-view, were not shy to create humour and put wit into the music. Morrissey’s lyrics were frequently caustic and cutting but provide plenty of moments where the listener could not help but chuckle – or elicit a cheeky grin at the very least. I find a lot of current artists are far too serious with their music. It is understandable they’d reveal some hurt and emotion in their songs. What gets to me is the po-faced and imperious nature of music today. One occasionally hears something ribald and entertaining: those songs are often overshadowed by the very intense, straight-faced and unmoving. I look for various different things in music. For one, I want it to be interesting and have some personality. It needs to provoke certain physicality; get my mind working and dig deep into the heart. Occasionally, one needs to hear music that does all of that whilst putting a smile on the face. I will compile a list of comical songs at the end: not all of them are that good, as it happens. Artists try and write something funny; it can come off as a bit of a parody or juvenile. Those songs are best avoided but do, at the very least, try to be amusing.

IN THIS PHOTO: The Smiths

Going into music is a nervous and unpredictable time. You begin and assume it will be easy-going. It takes a lot of graft and passion to make things work – a lot of artists struggle and never get the recognition they deserve. Are musicians, given the perils and realities of the industry, going to write songs that try to be funny? Well, perhaps not but, even when writing about love and your own self; the lyrics can be funny and entertaining. Take an artist like The Streets (Mike Skinner). His humour was laddish and observational. He wrote about the realities of modern life on albums like A Grand Don’t Come for Free and Original Pirate Material. Straight from the off (the latter); he ensured his songs had that balance of serious and humorous. I listen to songs like Don’t Mug Yourself (Original Pirate Material) and Fit but You Know It (A Grand Don’t Come for Free) and are hooked by Skinner’s wordplay and wit. It is sad he is not producing music anymore but definitely inspired legions of British Hip-Hop/Rap artists to follow in his footsteps. Dizzee Rascal is probably the most relevant contemporary: a man who can bite and spit but pen a pretty good gag here and there. I find a lot of genres are humourless and stringently serious. Take another The Streets song, The Irony of It All, and it pits a lovable weed-smoking intellectual with a loutish beer-guzzler. The former indulges in cannabis but provides no danger to the community: the latter, gets tanked-up and creates chaos. The song looks at how the drunkard pays his taxes and shouldn’t be giving his money to a drug-taker – in return, facts are laid out (more money spent on treating drunks than most things). It is a really great song that, in lesser hands, could be a drag but is lifted by a sharp and witty pen. It is not a surprise some of my favourite albums ever are notable because of their lightness and accessibility.

IN THIS PHOTO: Steely Dan

The Streets’ Original Pirate Material is in there; The Smiths’ The Queen Is Dead – Steely Dan’s back catalogue features heavily. Pretzel Logic, an album I have had on-repeat for days, is, at times, a comedy routine from Donald Fagen. Maybe is more a smart-ass laconic sense of humour but the stomach is definitely given a good workout. I must admit; as said, some of the attempts at humour can be quite misjudged and tragic. There is that danger of creating a novelty song. We all remember (vaguely) artists like Afroman and his drugs paen – a song that was funny in places but not one of the best comedy songs. The main reason for addressing humour in music is to nod to those who deliberately tried to write comedy. My first real exposure to comedy records was Monty Python Sings. That album, released in 1989, brought together the collected songs of the legendary comedy troupe – from their first series to their final film, The Meaning of Life (1983). There are some classic moments that we all know – Always Look on the Bright Side of Life; Lumberjack Song and Every Sperm Is Sacred. Sure, there are skits and moments that have not aged too well but, considering a lot of these songs were written nearly forty years ago; it is amazing they have endured the way they have. I was never a big fan of the T.V. series the Pythons did: the films seemed more consistent and digestible. It is the songs of Monty Python that I keep revisiting. You do not need the sketches/scenes to contextualise the music. The songs stand on their own and elicit plenty of gold. “Weird Al” Yankovic introduced his debut album in 1983, and with it, a plethora of delightful parodies. His talent, as it continues today, is to take famous songs and provide a comedic take on them – the likes of Madonna, Michael Jackson and The Kinks were all in the firing line. Off the Deep End (the cover was a spoof take on Nirvana’s Nevermind) had plenty of great moments and gained a lot of respect from critics – even if some weren’t overly-kind at the time.

IN THIS PHOTO: "Weird Al" Yankovic

The best of the bunch, when it comes to comedic music, is Flight of the Conchords. They say, as it is told, they’re New Zealand’s 'fourth-best Folk parody group'. Dubbed, without much competition one would think, New Zealand’s best novelty group – it consists comic writers/actors Brett McKenzie and Jermaine Clement. They started their Folk incarnation in the late-1990s and, since, have gained celebrity status. The duo started on BBC radio in a series that was largely improvised – their search for fame in London. The bumbling, ever-hopeful Kiwis came to the airwaves in 2004 before (the show/concept) Flight of the Conchords transitioned to T.V. in 2007. The HBO series was similar to the radio show: the duo was in New York (rather than London) but everything else was the same. Rhys Darby played the band’s hapless manager, Murray. Episodes revolved around the duo trying to get gigs – having to take demeaning, mundane jobs to exist in the city – and, inevitably, failing – often having to play really crappy venues and spots. It is quite tragic in places but elevated by some incredible writing and consistently charming performances. It is the music that, no surprise, makes the show. Flight of the Conchords is not a vehicle for two comedians to ‘try their hand at music’. McKenzie and Clement are skilful musicians and singers in their own right: it provided the show some authenticity and naturalness. The duo’s eponymous album, and their finest achievement, is a collection of the songs used during the first series of Flight of the Conchords. Many of the songs were written years before – starting on the radio show, in fact. Because of that; they are honed, chiselled and perfectly delivered. Like Monty Python: one does not need to be familiar with the T.V. show to understand the songs and find them appealing. The best songs from the album – Business Time, Inner City Pressure; Ladies of the World and The Most Beautiful Girl (In the Room) – demand repeated listens and are among the funniest songs you’ll hear.

IN THIS PHOTO: Flight of the Conchords

The guys’ second album, I Told You I Was Freaky, was released after the second series and, because of the short time between series and demand to write new songs, the quality is not as prevalent as the debut. The debut resonates because the songs had years to gestate. The sophomore album, that said, has some great moments and shows huge musical depth. Carol Brown parodies Paul Simon’s 50 Ways to Leave Your Lover but has gorgeous (female) choirs; some beautiful finger-picking and a stunning melody. Too Many Dicks (On the Dance Floor) a club banger in the style of Black Eyed Peas – where the guys examine the male-female ratio in the club; the fact there is too many dudes present. Sugarlumps, as title suggests, is a spoof of, again, Black Eyed Peas – and their song, My Humps. Even trashy Dance-style songs are elevated to something magnificent by the New Zealand duo. On their eponymous debut; you bond with the music as easily as the lyrics themselves. Inner City Pressure knowledgeable and respectful plays with West End Girls (Pet Shop Boys); Boom, a take on Shaggy’s Dancehall songs; Business Time, a cross between Barry White and Prince, oddly. Let’s hope, as has been rumoured, there is a Flight of the Conchords film. The boys are busy with other acting work but have had time to craft some new tracks. I feel there is a genuine vacuum that needs to be filled. Of course, ‘comedy’ songs will never rival more-serious tracks – in terms of quality and mass appeal – but, as shown, there are artists who sprinkle humour alongside emotion and vulnerability. I feel we all need a bit of cheer and uplift right now. Conventional music is a bit hit-and-miss when it comes to delivering mirth and chuckle. As I spin Inner City Pressure - once more, for the road! - and Clement’s woes: “The manager, Bevan, starts to abuse me/Hey man, I just want some Muesli!”; McKenzie’s spot-on observations: “No one cares, no one sympathises/You just stay home and play synthesisers” – it has lifted my mood and, consequently, my outlook on the day. Not all comedic songs do that but, in the case of the Kiwi Folk legends, songs like that…

DO the job pretty well!

FEATURE: Pride: In the Name of…

FEATURE:

 

Pride:

 

 

 In the Name of…

________

IT is hard to believe it has been fifty years since…

PHOTO CREDIT: Katy Blackwood

homosexuality was decimalised. In fact, scrub that - quite an odd opening line, that one! What I mean is it is baffling homosexuality was ever illegal to begin with. I am glad we are in more civilised times and people are coming together to celebrate that anniversary. London has been lit up but a festival of colour and love: the two-day Pride festival has got underway in emphatic style! The event, in fact, started late last month but the major events have taken place today. Tomorrow is the final day of Pride: a chance for people to take to the capital’s streets and show their support. You can look at the official website and keep abreast of all the happenings. I have a musician friend who is involved with a charity single – all proceeds go to Pride in London. You can access it here - because, not only it is a fantastic song, but one that generates awareness and vital funds. If the past few months have taught us anything is how strong we are together. There have been events and tragedies that could have dragged us down and divided the nation. Instead, against the tide of fear and uncertainty, has been a relentless campaign of unity and positivity. We are a nation peerless when it comes to unifying and battling things/people who try and forge cracks. Right now, London is still buzzing from a day of music, marches and events. The people have come out in droves and, through performances, discussions and socialising, raised awareness of the L.G.B.T.Q. movement and marked a very special day. I know there is oppression and discrimination still – one wonders whether the L.G.B.T.Q. community will ever be truly accepted – but we have progressed from those dark days of the 1960s – when one could be arrested and imprisoned for expressing their human right: to love whoever they want.

Tomorrow will be an important and memorable day. The final chance, this year, to show your support and, quite literally, your colours. It is heartening seeing the thousands painted and daubed with variegation and vividness. The smiles have been on faces and a mystic cheer in the air. It is rare to see that happen in London – making it a shame things have to end – but it is just what the people need. Lest we forget those who fought for years to legalise homosexuality in this country. It was a long and hard fight but, fifty years down the line, we can remember them and know their struggle was not in vain. I know musicians who are homosexual and, even in 2017, there is that feeling they are not as accepted and comfortable as they’d like to me – a certain stigma still attached to having a lifestyle many feel it ‘strange’. Love of all types is beautiful so, God knows why, homosexuality was ever seen as sinful, immoral or wrong. I suppose those sort of narrow-minded people were a product of the times they lived in – generations who knew no different and were brought up to believe scurrilous ‘facts’. Those in the L.G.B.T.Q. community are among the warmest and most loving people you’ll ever meet: denying them a fundamental right, as I said, is criminal in itself. That is why this weekend – and today especially – have been so important. Most of the year, many do not see the realities of being homosexual. Many people are judged, sneered at and made to feel like second-class citizens – simply because their sexual orientation does not fit in with what is seen as ‘normal’. Even, in 2017, we are seeing some disturbing and prehistoric ideologies rearing their foul head. One hopes festivals like Pride make people think twice and makes real changes. We have come a long way in the past five decades but there is still work to be done. Like women in music; many musicians of the L.G.B.T.Q. community are afflicted with stigma and anxiety. It is not right but I am confident effective progressions are being felt. In honour of Pride – and marking the end of a rather special day – I have collated a playlist of, I think, the biggest ‘gay anthems’ and Pride-appropriate songs from across the ages.

Enjoy…

FEATURE: Sexism and Misogyny in Music: Time for Changes

FEATURE:

 

Sexism and Misogyny in Music:

 

 PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

  Time for Changes

________

THERE are two things I want to concentrate on tonight.

IN THIS PHOTO: Punk band, The Dickies

The first, as you will see, is quite weighty and serious: the second is a nod to the Bella Union label – which is twenty-years-old. I will come to that soon but, before then, something has reared its head. A music friend of mine – who works down in Brighton – has set up a Facebook group for promoters; essentially, ensuring bands who promote intimidation and fear are not given the oxygen of publicity and performance opportunities. This piece, and her group, to an extent, stemmed from an incident that occurred at a performance by the Punk band The Dickies. Frontman Leonard Graves Phillips, during the Warped Tour, directed a tirade against a young woman in the audience. There has been, in fact, an article published in LA Weekly that gives two sides to the debate. There are those in one camp – the older men who feel the ‘Punk Spirit’ is perfectly defined by such offensive and ill-judged verbal barrages – and those, quite rightly, who has taken umbrage at the attack. I believe the woman in the crowd was a friend of the band but, whether she agreed to be disparaged and belittled during that gig – does that send out a positive message?! Of course not! Even if Punk, which it doesn’t, depends on a certain amount of shock and disgust: where do we draw the lines and how far can we go?! I am all for music having some unpredictability and controversy. I am all for bands having a political motive and speaking out against corruptness and those who do not protect the needs of the masses. Artists might have a particular affection for environmentalism and conservation – that is impressive and commendable. So long as, playing devil’s advocate here, these subjects are not forced down the collective gullet – would one ever temporise and deter artists from having a voice?! I would say not. It is prudent musicians are not reserved to talking about music and being confined. So many artists are calculated, scared and confined to boxes – made to talk about their material and reluctant to have any ideas that might cause discussion.

PHOTO CREDIT: Ebru Yildi/IN THIS PHOTO: PWR BTTM

I am not saying every musician should say whatever they want but there need to be lines drawn and barriers opened – certain mouths need to be stapled shut, it seems! LA Weekly went on to offer some exposition and explanation:

I consider myself a feminist (the piece was written by Lina Lecaro) and I think, in theory, that the idea of Safer Scenes is good and needed. But you can’t expect the people you oppose to take the higher ground if you don’t take it yourself. (We should all keep this in mind every time we insult Trump; we should focus on his shitty policies, not his bad hair, weight or orange-ness.) Safer Spaces is on the Warped Tour, with an info booth, to provide dialogue identifying, preventing and addressing sexual harassment and violence, racism and ableism at the festival. This should be done with positivity and some semblance of the respect they are fighting for”.

As a feminist; there would be easy temptation dangling from the tree in the Garden of Eden: attack Graves Phillips and his ‘publicity stunt’ and not provide any sort of balance. Lecaro went on to say:

Actors don’t perform in blackface anymore. Rock stars don’t have sex with 13-year-old groupies anymore. Punks don’t wear Nazi regalia anymore. What’s acceptable culturally changes over time, and our entertainment reflects this. Those of us living through these transitions may find it more challenging to accept, but we need to try…At the heart of the present moment's transition is a simple truth, one that today's kids seem to grasp intuitively: If you’re not, for example, black, you will never really know what it’s like to be black, or know how certain trigger words feel when they’re uttered in your presence. Never. Same for women: If you don't have a vagina, you don’t know. (OK, dudes?) All that any of us can do is accept that we don’t really get it and respect others when they tell us this is so”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Eagles of Death Metal's Jesse Hughes

It is a fascinating piece and one that is delivered with maturity, candidness and consideration. As a man – and a lover of the rebels of Punk – there would be the temptation for me to say this is a one-off event and there should not be such a sensitive reaction and sense of outrage. The problem is this: it is not a one-off occurrence and it is getting worse. Artists/bands including Moose Blood, The King Blues and PWR BTTM have caused shockwaves - the sexual misconduct/allegations that were levied at, especially, members of Moose Blood and PWR BTTM, were truly shocking. I remember when PWR BTTM were accused of sexual assault - and found promoters and venues cancelling their shows through fears of uprising and protest. I know there are many who say Punk has always been associated with these kinds of issues – why make such a furore of it?! Back in the 1970s, bands like Sex Pistols would spout off and create a storm – often voicing their disapproval of the monarchy – and modern bands talk vociferously about the government and society. If it is ‘okay’ for them to show little discretion towards these issues then why should we be so protective and disgusted about sexism?! The sort of (crude) language and vulgarity Leonard Graves Phillips spewed during that set has reverberated through the music community and seen a lot of people speak out. It does not surprise me legendary bell-ends like Jesse Hughes (Eagles of Death Metal) offer his support to Graves Phillips. Consider the things he said about the Bataclan attacks – conspiracy theories regarding the security guards being involved – his views are not only predictable but completely insane. There are others, on social media, who have backed Graves Phillips and undermined the argument. They say people should get over it and, in the grand scheme of things; it is not such a big deal. If you heard this kind of thing on the street; would you shrug it off and forgive the culpable party?! You would, I hope, be offended and inculpate the offender – knowing they had done wrong and carried around tired and Neolithic attitudes. We are, I believe, in 2017 and know a lot better than previous generations. We cannot, without seeming idiotic, claim to be progressive and evolved when we allow, supposedly mature and intelligent adults, forum to promulgate such hideous ideals.

IN THIS PHOTO: U.S. journalist and D.J., Lina Lecaro

As a male journalist, I think it is important many more men express their disapproval and anger. It is great there is, for the most part, the right reaction to this event. We do not want children growing up thinking such things are commonplace and acceptable. Yes, there are a few isolated incidences but the fact there have been a few within a short space is worrying. If we had female artists saying sexist things you know the media would eat them alive – men would come out and take them to task. It seems the male writers and peers are not as loud and noticeable when it comes to tackling this issue. Maybe I am wrong but it would be nice to see more support from the boys. The Dwarves are another band who have opened their odious mouths and not engaged their peanut-sized brains. It is men creating the issue: my gender should do everything they can to eradicate such obstreperous and vile musicians. The music industry, as it should be, promotes love, togetherness and acceptance. Recent events like Grenfell – and the awful fire that engulfed the tower – have seen musicians come out in force and voice their opinions of the government – bringing love to the debate. The fact so many artists got together and did fundraisers; joined together and did all they could was very heartening. That is the positive and extraordinary side of music: when great people go the extra mile and try to make things better. The other side of the coin is tarnished and rusty: it is less severe and prevalent than the positive but leaves a very nasty aftertaste. I, like many, do not accept sexist and ‘male attitudes to women are not natural parts of a genre. Punk is all about free expression and an irascible spit. Going back to that LA Weekly article and a particular paragraph stood out:

While nobody can define “punk" right now, we can probably all agree that it's a form of expression that came as a reaction to close-minded people imposing their views on others, right? If this is so, then the way it's delivered will have to change with the times, whether purists or old-schoolers like it or not. If that means my daughter feels more comfortable at a punk show when she's a teenager than I did, great. If it doesn't, I think she'll be OK, too”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Moose Blood, whose drummer, Glenn Harvey, was accused of sexual harassment

Maybe there is that generational argument: those who grew up where this kind of controversy was more common and more acceptable; those, now, who expect better standards from musicians and know it is not part-and-parcel of the modern age. Regardless of your age, upbringing and expectations; we cannot allow mealy-mouthed, black-souled sermons to be seen as ‘alright’ and impressive. Those who have stood in support of this sexism and offence are not people you’d expect to have a strong moral compass and be ambassadors of a purer society – making their idiotic opinions null and pathetic. It all comes down to how important music is and what legacy we want to leave for the generation. As I said; I think musicians shouldn’t be robotic soundbites who are puppets of the record label – speaking in clichés and making sure their answers as vanilla and safe as can be. We would be taking liberties – and denying basic human rights – were we to muzzle all artists. As a consequence of The Dickies’ controversy; they have had gigs pulled – included one scheduled in Leicester at The Musician. The promoters there felt the misogyny and crudeness displayed by The Dickies’ musician was unacceptable. That is the lesson for musicians: you think you have the right to descend to the level of the caveman and you will find yourself at the mercy of the Sabretooth Tiger – and get your head the f*ck bitten off! I’ll close this down now but wanted to bring to light a shade that is threatening to tarnish music’s good name. In the past, I have written extensively about sexism and how female artists are not given headline slots – fewer chances than the men and made to feel, by comparison, meagre and inferior. This hardly helps and leads me to think a major overhaul needs to happen. It is clear the kind of people perpetuating such sexist and old-fashioned ideals: the white middle-aged men. That is not true of ALL injustices but there is a clear pattern. Sure, certain Hip-Hop/Rap artists – among many other artists – have always been associated with a casual attitude to gender rights, sexism and decency.

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

We cannot label a particular group and say it is the sole responsibility of the middle-aged man to correct their minds and come into the modern age. Sexism and misogyny extend across genres, nations and age ranges – it not confined to niche demographics and types of music. That might sound worrying on paper – like a plague spreading without abatement and cure – but it is not an unwinnable war. There needs to be education and outrage. If bands like The Dickies think it is acceptable to casually shoot off offensive insults and degrade a female gig-goer then their punishment, like gigs being pulled and widespread condemnation, should compel them to take stock and sober-up. I worry there will be those reluctant and rigidly hanging onto their beliefs: why should we change who we are and be tamed?! I have mentioned a few bands who have been accused of sexism but we cannot simply race to decry and band all of them – there needs to be constructive debates and decrees. Simply prohibiting all of them from touring would not be the right way to do things – not ever member of each band support their guilty member(s) and can be tarred with the same reputation. What we do need to do is, when certain artists create storms and problems, act swiftly and set examples. The harsher and, in fact, fairer the repercussions are, the less likely we are to see repeat offences. This should extend to racism and every type of similar offence. Sexism and misogyny are, essentially, a form of harassment. It is not acceptable for people to do this in society so why should we be more relaxed with musicians? I know it is hard determining boundaries (of) freedom of speech. If we reign-in bands like The Dickies, does that mean we are saying ALL musicians should be monitored? It is hard to police but it is clear the recent sexist/misogynistic happenings are completely unacceptable. Whether you are a Punk band of rebels or a stone-cold Hip-Hop stud: never should you demean a woman or think misogyny is ‘cool’ and necessary. It is 2017, guys, so, with that in mind, let’s, please

PHOTO CREDIT: Shutterstock

GROW the hell up!

FEATURE: Bella Union: Twenty Years of Music Gold

FEATURE:

 

Bella Union:

 

  

Twenty Years of Music Gold

________

I was, as I do most days, listening to BBC Radio 6 Music today and…

IN THIS PHOTO: Bella Union head, Simon Raymonde

heard an interview with Simon Raymonde. He was a member of Cocteau Twins between 1983 and 1997 and, after the breakup of the band, set up the Bella Union label. Listening to Lauren Laverne interview label boss Raymonde talk about the gestation and creation of Bella Union got me thinking – how many great artists are signed to them. In fact, following releases on the 4AD label - for most of their career - Cocteau Twins set up Bella Union – it wa spearheaded by Raymonde and Robin Guthrie. Dirty Three, the Australian band, were one of the earliest acts to sign up – the label features everyone from John Grant to Laura Veirs. Listening to that interview, just now, and I understand John Grant, when he first sent demos. to Raymonde, was not considered that good. He was in the band The Czars and took time to forge a sound that was approved of – I think it took nine months of back-and-forth submissions for Raymonde to fall for his charms. Raymonde has been in sole charge since 2000 and has steered and evolved one of the most reputable labels in the world. Fleet Foxes, in 2008 and 2009, remained in the charts for one-hundred weeks and had the biggest-selling independent album of the year. John Grant is a huge success story and one of the biggest name tied to Bella Union. Mercury Rev, The Low Anthem and Jambinai are a sprinkling (among a deluge) of stunning artists who have helped propel and cement the reputation of Bella Union. They won Independent Record Company of the Year in 2010, 2012; 2014 and 2016 – in 2014, John Grant was nominated for a BRIT Award; Holly Macve, the Yorkshire-born singer, was signed in 2015; Father John Misty was nominated for a BRIT – another mainstream act who is happy and proud to be with the label. In honour of twenty years of sterling service; I have collated a playlist of the Bella Union artists who have made Simon Raymonde’s stable…

IN THIS PHOTO: John Grant

SUCH an impressive one.

FEATURE: Björk: Debut Gold and Post-Partum Progression

FEATURE:

 

Björk:

 

 

 Debut Gold and Post-Partum Progression

________

THERE are few artists who have made as big a contribution to...

The album cover for Björk's sophomore effort, Post

The album cover for Björk's sophomore effort, Post

modern music as Björk. In terms of innovation and reinvention; none match her sense of style, impact and wonder. This year (in July) it will be twenty-four years since Debut – strangely, not her debut album – was released. From the opening notes of Human Behaviour – the first track from the L.P. – you know something special is happening. The strange and bellicose percussion; the experimentation and odd sounds – all elevated by a unique and otherworldly vocal. When I first heard that album - I must have been ten at the time – it was like stepping onto another planet. Nobody like Björk had made its way to my ears: there has been nothing quite like her since. Sure, artists like Kate Bush may have inspired her vocal approach and style of songwriting – that is the only other artist I can think of. What amazes me about Debut is the sheer confidence that runs through it.

PHOTO CREDIT: Jean-Baptiste Mondino

PHOTO CREDIT: Jean-Baptiste Mondino

Produced with Nellee Hooper; it is an album that bristles with passion, storybook fantasy and intensity. Venus as a Boy is beguiling and flowing; Big Time Sensuality feverish and emphatic; There’s More to Life Than This intimate and atmospheric – the fact it was recorded at the Milk Bar toilets gave it a certain ‘gravitas’ and unusualness. There are fans/critics who think Björk made a better record but I am not so sure. Taking this position suggests everything that followed Debut was inferior but that is not the case. Post, the sophomore album, is more varied and confident than Debut but I will always hold Björk’s first album as her finest. I get sucked into the record and everything unfolding. Even then, at such a young age, the Icelandic legend was taking charge of the songwriting and ensuring as few hands as possible was in the mix. That is a lesson for songwriters in today’s market: look at what can be achieved when you assume control and create a singular listening experience. Maybe contemporary artists do not have the same vision and talent as Björk - but too many rely on other producers/writers to help them achieve their sound.

The cover to Björk's 1993 introduction, Debut

The cover to Björk's 1993 introduction, Debut

Debut is an album that, yes, has a few minor songs – One Day and The Anchor Song do not get mentioned often – but they are still fantastic tracks. The entire album makes a huge impact and shows what Björk is one of the most enduring and respected artists of the past twenty-five years. Following on from Debut was 1995’s Post. THIS is the album you’ll see on the critics’ best-of-the-best lists and always gets people talking. From its beautiful and striking cover to its brilliant videos – the promotional for It’s Oh So Quiet is especially memorable – you felt an artist growing and increasing her confidence. Not that she was lacking on Debut but, on Post, the songs were bigger, kaleidoscopic and diverse – everything from tender and child-like (Isobel) to domineering and machine-like (Army of Me). A few writers do make their way onto the album but, for the most part, it is Björk at her purest and most widescreen. There are a couple of weaker tracks but, like her debut, the sheer brilliance and quality that runs throughout compensates.

Another magnificent album that brought in new instruments, soundscapes and ideas. That is why Björk remains unique but compels so many young songwriters: those cinematic and evocative scores; the way she weaved her vocals and creates something physical and spiritual. Skewed, peculiar – yet always accessible and inviting – it meant Post gained huge critical acclaim and saw Björk elevated to the public bosom. It was another two years before Homogenic arrived. That album was a salute to her home country of Iceland – despite the fact it was recorded in Spain. Homogenic has glacial strings and lava-warm pulses: the innocence of childhood and the fears of adulthood. It is a spectacular album that does not repeat previous works.

The striking cover for Björk's 1997 album, Homogenic

The striking cover for Björk's 1997 album, Homogenic

Artists in her position could easily have replicated themselves and done something quite familiar. Homogenic retained Björk’s distinct vocals and pioneering compositions but walked into new territory. Perhaps icier and more simplistic than previous work – Björk wanted a single sound and something quite pure – it contains few sweet and Pop-like numbers. Anyone expecting bombast and big anthems would have been a little disappointed. An album dedicated to Iceland would, naturally, have some cheerier moments and optimism. That was not what Homogenic was about. Björk wanted to try something new and go back, sonically, where she started her life. It is another bold move and spectacular album that, in lesser hands, could have been a disaster. Critics were welcoming and impressed by the album. Rather than hark back to Debut and Post; they found much to admire in Homogenic. Some felt Björk would never equal and album as groundbreaking and astonishing as Homogenic. A daunting gauntlet and proclamation for an artist to hear: it did not phase Björk – she went on to create many more astonishing albums and, in many respects, did not need to top Homogenic. It is a singular creation that showed a very special side to her.

Medúlla, in 2004, was a huge success for the Icelandic star

Medúlla, in 2004, was a huge success for the Icelandic star

Later albums, Vespertine and Medúlla arrived in the early-mid-2000s and carried on that legacy of wonderment and brilliance. Those albums, more in common with Homogenic than her earlier material, gained huge plaudits from the critics. Vespertine, especially, was seen as one of the finest albums of the '00s and a mature work – from an artist able to project eccentricity and excitement without seeming undisciplined and unfocused. That balance of maturity and youth – sounding grown-up without appearing old – was a bold move from someone renowned for her captivating energy and experimentation. This phase of career - compared to the Debut-Post regency - signalled new endeavours and mood – a woman wanting to compel in silence; little need to overwhelm the senses with sound and histrionics. Not that her early albums were over-emotive and reckless – this was Björk more settled, at peace and, dare one say, better?!

Björk's 2001's, critically acclaimed album, Vespertine

Björk's 2001's, critically acclaimed album, Vespertine

That is a claim shared by many critics at the time. Vespertine shot to the top of many critical lists – some put it among the top-five albums of the decade (as it was released in 2001, these were retrospective lists). Medúlla (released in 2004) was less glacial and demure than its predecessor. It reignited some of the joy one experienced (last) on Post. Not that it was a complete return to her previous days – a way to tie some of her older sounds with new discoveries. Volta arrived in 2007 and, forged a balance between her Pop-sounding work of the '90s with her experimental music of the '00s. It was embraced by critics but some were unsure whether it was as coherent as striking as it could be - a bit messy in places and not what we would expect from someone so spectacular. Björk wanted the album to be a lot more 'up' and propulsive than her previous two albums - that need to create something fun. Almost a return to Debut and Post: Volta encapsulated that early energy and youthfulness. Perhaps those albums captured a time and were part of a 'phase' for Björk - some were not ready for a return to that sound. Regardless; tracks like Earth Intruders and The Dull Flame of Desire have a unique eccentricity that one could not help fall for.

Björk, during the promotional campaign for Volta

Björk, during the promotional campaign for Volta

If anything, her two most-recent albums – 2011’s Biophilia and 2015’s Vulnicura – pushed Björk’s music AGAIN. Biophilia composed the album as a concept – during the 2008-2011 Icelandic financial crisis. The album explores ties between nature, music and technology. It was the first ‘app. album’ and was released as a multimedia project – linking the album’s themes to musicology projects.

That was followed by educational workshops in four continents. Not only did Björk create a unique promotional campaign but was determined to educate and bring vital lessons to people. Biophilia, in parts a musical experience; in others, an educational lecture. The music contained astronomy, apocalypse and oddity. Björk created her own sound and (a record) part-spacey and detached; part-focused and human. Critics were not as hot on this album as previous but recognised Björk’s ever-continuing desire to change music and push sound to new limits. Few artists take the trouble to redesign and reinvent music. Many, who might have lost some affection for the Icelandic treasure on Biophilia, were back on board for Vulnicura. Many proclaimed it her boldest and best work in a decade: stylistically similar to Homogenic and expansive – daring and challenging as she was on her debut.

Biophilia saw Björk embrace new technologies to create her sound

Biophilia saw Björk embrace new technologies to create her sound

It has been two years since her last album but, one suspects, Björk will be back in action very soon! As you can tell from that rundown, and hear from the playlist below, she is someone constantly evolving and surprising the people. Twenty-four years from her debut release; there is a fondness and love for Björk I have not seen in other artists – that constant support and affection. In fact, it is more respect: a woman who speaks out against sexism and proves she is more than a match for any of her male peers. On that note; I have been lobbying, like many, for women to take the headline spots at our biggest festivals. It seems only natural, when Glastonbury returns in two years, Björk is considered as a headliner. Given the impact she has made on music – and the legions of musicians inspired by her – how could she not warrant a top slot?! She would put on an epic and mind-melting production that is for sure. I am surprised she was not approached this year: a Sunday night closer from Björk would have been spectacular. I wanted to concentrate on Björk’s music career – she is someone who engages in politics; is a talented author and a bit of a polymath. Whether you bond with her music or not: there is no doubting the influence and talent of Björk.

She remains of the most spectacular and intriguing talents in all of music. I am excited to see what the next few years hold and whether we will see more material. If/when that does happen; one has to ask what shape it will take? Given the way she has embraced technology – transforming her music through it – will her next album be an ultra-modern technological and digital exploration?! Perhaps she will subvert expectation and release something left-field (even more so than usual!) or return to her roots. We could see a Folk album or something entirely instrumental. Who knows with Björk – that is the great thing about her. I look at musicians one would consider ‘unique’ – in the truest and most unquestioning sense – and would put Björk alongside the likes of Kate Bush and Bob Dylan. She is THAT special – long may she continue to reign! Listening to her music is like steeping into another world. One is, at first, wary but embraced the quirkiness, evocativeness and beauty. When all is said and done it is a…

Björk's latest album, Vulnicura, arrived in 2015

Björk's latest album, Vulnicura, arrived in 2015

GREAT place to be.