FEATURE:
If I Fell
The Undying Magic of The Beatles’ 1964 Film, A Hard Day’s Night
__________
I have been thinking a lot…
about The Beatles films that are due in 2028. Sam Mendes’s films that focuses on each of the four members. I am not sure what time period each films concentrates on, whether there is crossover and what to expect, but it looks exciting. Apart from people slagging off those cast and commenting on their lack of resemblance to who they are playing - Saoirse Ronan plays Linda McCartney, and many have said she does not look anything like her -, there has been chat and buzz. We have a way to go, though one of the most heartening things is that, we all hope, the two surviving Beatles will see the films. Paul McCartney will see Paul Mescal play him, whilst Ringo Starr will have his views on Barry Keoghan. I admit a couple of the Beatles castings are clearly going for the acting strength rather than pure physical resemblance, but I think Sam Mendes will deliver these acclaimed and brilliant films. I write a lot about Kate Bush and note that, whilst she has not released an album since 2011, her influence is everywhere. Arguably one of the most influential artists in terms of today’s music, and yet so little is written about her! The Beatles broke up over fifty years ago, yet there are countless books and projects about them. Their peak period of influence may have been the 1990s and bands clearly indebted to them. Oasis obviously and unapologetically; Blur more subtly (or were they?!), and everyone from Shed Seven to Kula Shaker to Suede clearly taking bits of their music and weaving it into their own. I do love how there is constant talk around the band. McCartney and Starr, far from distancing themselves, celebrating it. I think that, if George Harrison and John Lennon had lived, they would be more distant. Pleased some films are approaching, through they would both possibly detached themselves in a way that Starr and McCartney won’t. A whole new generation are connecting with a band whose peak and regency was in the 1960s.
Even though they were not alive when Beatlemania swept the global, their parents or grandparents were (my parents in my case, as I am forty-three), and it is was like nothing we will ever see again. Taylor Swift has some of that hysteria behind her, but The Beatles changed popular culture so fast, and was this never-seen-before explosion! Their screaming fans, predominantly girls and young women, got a lot of bad press. Some were aggressive and took things too far, though there was a lot of misogyny around them. These are thew fans that made The Beatles. That provided this primal and world-shaking energy. If it was a bit draining for the quartet, the passion these screaming fans showed was something else. I feel we need to give them a lot more respect and credit! This takes me to my second-favourite film ever (my favourite is 2012’s Frances Ha): A Hard Day’s Night. The 1964 debut film featuring The Beatles, it is also their best outing. If 1965’s Help! had its moments and is good, I feel it is not up there with A Hard Day’s Night. I also like how their debut is in black-and-white and gives it this instant nostalgia (which is also why Frances Ha was shot in black-and-white by director, Noah Baumbach). We know that Ringo Starr is the best actor in it, yet George Harrison is the best dressed; I feel Paul McCartney is maybe the most charming, whereas John Lennon features in some of the best scenes (him in the bathtub and being like an overgrown child; on the stairwell where a woman thinks he has recognised him and Lennon says he is not himself, whereupon she takes a closer look and agrees!). We are blessed that A Hard Day’s Night’s director, Richard Lester, is still with us. He turns ninety-five in January, and I do hope that, a) he is still with us then and, b) A Hard Day’s Night is shown at smaller cinemas again to mark that. Its screenwriter, Alun Owen, died in 1994. I wonder if Lester will see the four Beatles films. What he help create in 1964 perfectly captured this growing hysteria around the band, but you also got to see the boys interact. Different sides to their personalities. George Harrison and him doing a bit of fashion modelling. Paul McCartney with his fictional grandfather, played by Wilfrid Brambell. John Lennon didn’t get a story arc quite as defined or interesting, I feel. Ringo Starr with a mudlark who rolls a tyre that knocks him off his feet. He was played by David Janson. He actually appeared at the final I Am the EggPod live event, that was held at London’s Holland Opera Park in 2024. That podcast was helmed by Chris Shaw, and I miss it dearly! That final live event was a mixture of sadness and great cheer and love.
This all takes me rather clumsily to Samira Ahmed. She featured on the podcast numerous times, including my favourite episode, where she was chatting about the band’s debut album, 1963’s Please Please Me, where she made some great observations. She, at the live podcast and on an earlier episode, chatted about A Hard Day’s Night. We both have in common the fact that A Hard Day’s Night is one of our favourite films. It may be her all-time favourite! I love that episode too, as we learned why the album and film was and is so important to her. I have been rewatching it and was overcome with the joy of seeing it! I love that chase scene where fans are racing after the band and there is this scramble and high-jinx. It is brilliantly written and all the band really commit. It is one of the earliest examples of a popular group featuring in a film about them or their work. Albeit, a slightly heighted or fictionalised version. Since then, everyone from Charli xcx to Spice Girls to Prince to Eminem have done their versions of A Hard Day’s Night. People might not see a connection, though I feel The Beatles did sort of start this (though Elvis Preseley was appearing in films before 1964). I did want to talk about Samira Ahmed, because she wrote a book about the film. It came out in April and it is a book that every Beatles fan should have on their shelf:
“How did a film made to capture a pop phenomenon become an enduring cinematic classic?
With warmth, wit and precision, Samira Ahmed reveals how the Beatles’ first film changed both the band themselves and pop music’s relationship with the screen.
In a vivid and personal exploration, she shows how this black-and-white gem, shot in a documentary style and brimming with youthful energy, captured Britain at a moment of social transformation, with a portrayal of celebrity, camaraderie and media frenzy that still resonates today. Drawing on her own experience of first discovering the film as a child and going on to work in the television industry, Ahmed shines a spotlight on the craft behind its enduring appeal. With insights from members of the cast and crew, including her own new interviews, Ahmed highlights A Hard Day’s Night’s class and sexual politics, and adds a delightfully original analysis of the women in the film.
In these pages you will be transported to a time when four young men from Liverpool, via the mass medium of television, changed the way Britain saw itself and the way the world saw Britain, revealing how, and why, A Hard Day’s Night has become a landmark of modern cinema”.
I will end with reviews around the 1964 masterpiece. It is a film a lot of non-Beatles fans (and who are those freaks?!) might not know about. It is understandable in a way, as it is sixty-two years old and is not spoken about in the same tone as the perceived greatest films of all time. I feel A Hard Day’s Night is among the most important films ever. Worthy of a book, for sure, which is why I wanted to highlight an interview with Samira Ahmed, where she discussed it. As I am thinking about The Beatles and there is always activity around them – the expanded and deluxe editions of Rubber Soul are out in October -, I did want to discuss the film. I can’t imagine whether Giles Marten has any more Beatles albums he will do the expanded treatment work to and give us demos, outtakes and the like. Is Help! (the 1965 album that preceded Rubber Soul) next, and is there much from the A Hard Day’s Night sessions to warrant a release?! I do genuinely think the film is among the best ever, and there is so much to discuss around it, which is why I hope it form part of Sam Mendes’s Beatles films – though he might be documenting the band a bit later on from that. Here, Samira Ahmed discussed her fabulous Beatles book:
“At the beginning of your book, you note, “With the huge growth in Beatles scholarship in recent years, I was wary of adding another book.” What compelled you to press on even though it feels like everything that there is to say about The Beatles has been said.
I was first introduced to The Beatles as a child via their films. My brother taped their movies off television in 1979 when I was 11. A Hard Day’s Night is a fascinating film because it captures them in the white heat of Beatlemania in Britain just before they go on The Ed Sullivan Show. I wanted to look at how this film captures Britain at that time. It’s not glamorized. You see ordinary trains and ordinary girls. There’s no sense of it being a fantasy. I didn’t think anybody had really looked at the social history side of this film.
At the beginning of the book, you argue that A Hard Day’s Night “was in fact a kind of cinematic Big Bang, shaping entire genre of screen entertainment: sitcoms, rock band films and spawning a new form—the pop video, for which in 1984 MTV gave Richard Lester a special Vanguard Award.” Let’s talk about this quote piece by piece. How did A Hard Day’s Night change sitcom television?
The most obvious impact is The Monkees, which is essentially a sitcom replica of A Hard Day’s Night. In his book Funny or Die, the comedy writer Joel Morris argues that the sitcom requires a patriarch, matriarch, craftsmen, and clown. A Hard Day’s Night has all of those things. John is the patriarch, Paul is the matriarch, George is the craftsman, and Ringo is the clown.
Comedy was also a big part of their lives. They wanted to work with director Richard Lester because they loved his film The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film. The Beatles were also natural comedians, though. Many of the contemporary reviews note how funny they are.
I think the biggest reason that The Beatles have stood the test of time is that their music still sounds so fresh. But their personalities are a big reason too. Decades later, those personalities are quite compelling.
Absolutely. It’s also important that they had a legitimate sitcom star, Wilfrid Brambell, in A Hard Day’s Night. (He was in Steptoe and Son, which was remade in the US as Sanford and Son.) His presence was almost a statement that The Beatles had entered the world of adults. This wasn’t just for kids”.
I will end with some reviews and retrospectives. I am starting with Empire and their 2000 essay/review. A mere thirty-six years after the film came out, and following a decade where so many artists were influenced by The Beatles, they had some interesting perspectives in their four-star review (A Hard Day’s Night is definitely a five-star film, I reckon!):
“Now before you get antzy, this is a comedy — albeit a comedy with music. Think about it. What transformed The Beatles into the Fab Four? The music got the girls screaming and had academics making comparisons with Mahler, but it was their quick wit that made them the loveable Mop Tops. John Lennon asking those in the audience to rattle their jewellery at the Royal Command Performance charmed the Establishment. A Hard Day's Night seduced the parents.
Even before the watershed conquest of America, the screenwriter (playwright Alun Owen) had accompanied the Fabs on a flying visit to Paris to witness the insanity of Beatlemania first hand. Although, whether his day-in-the-life format predated the Maysles brothers' strategy for US Beatles' documentary Yeah Yeah Yeah remains open to conjecture.
What's indisputable, however, was that the band was dead against the idea of making an Elvis-Cliff style musical and had already nixed Brian Epstein's enthusiasm for The Yellow Teddy Bears, as they wouldn't have been allowed to write their own songs. Indeed, it was the music that persuaded United Artists to back the movie in the first place — as not only would they make a quick killing while the group's sure-to-be short-lived popularity lasted, but they would also secure exclusive rights to a new "soundtrack" album.
Ultimately, this was to be the only LP solely composed by Lennon and McCartney and remained at No. 1 in the UK for 23 weeks.
Ironically, the director that producer Walter Shenson attached to the project had a history of those pop musicals the Fabs so detested. But, Dick Lester's use of camera in It's Trad, D.ad (1961) and the fact he had steered the Goons through their transition from radio to television won the Beatles over. Indeed, Lester's genius for physical comedy, that had informed Spike Milligan's The Running, Jumping And Standing Still Film (1959), would resurface in the manic playing-field shenanigans accompanying Can't Buy Me Love.
More importantly, Lester was something of a movie magpie. Just as John and Paul drew on R&B, rock'n'roll and showtune ballads for inspiration, so Lester borrowed liberally from Buster Keaton, Cinema Verite, documentary style Free Cinema, Fellini and the nouvelle vague for his unconventional approach to narrative and image-making. In the process, he became the godfather of MTV, as he sought ways of breaking from the lip sync and strum approach to filming pop. Even when he had no option, as in the final TV show sequence, he managed to use angle, lighting and rapid editing to fashion an anti-performance style,later followed by Ready, Steady, Go and Top Of The Pops.
His attempt to jettison traditional narrative altogether was less successful, however, as Ringo's runner and the Mack Sennettesque search for him definitely constitute a storyline. Moreover, it induces the only slackening in the breakneck pace, even though it did give Ringo a moment in the spotlight, similar to George's dismissal of the "grotty" trend-spotting media and John's mistaken identity encounter with Anna Quayle. Sadly, Paul's backstage showdown with a Shakespearean luvvie was cut.
Similarly, Wilfrid Brambell, as Paul's Irish grandfather, was given a few Steptoe-like set-pieces to cash in on his TV celebrity. But there was nothing sitcom about the rest of the film's humour. Whether scripted or ad-libbed, it managed to showcase the irreverent charm that had made the Mops the media's darlings, while also proving that, despite the fame, they were still just four likely lads from Liverpool.
Based on their now legendary performance at Kennedy Airport (which took place just weeks before shooting began), the press conference sequence is particularly revealing of their rapid-fire repartee. John later dismissed comparisons with the Marx Brothers. But there are definite similarities between their caustic combinations of sarcasm, puns, irony, insult and nonsensical deadpan, with the reporters almost becoming a collective Margaret Dumont (the stuffy comedy foil for the Marx brothers).
But Lester was keen to demonstrate both his and the group's catholic comedy influences. There's mild surrealism in the way the Fabs suddenly appear outside the train to taunt the snooty commuter and in John's unexplained disappearance from an emptying bath-tub. A hint of Chaplinesque pathos (or at least Norman Wisdom sentimentality) informs Ringo's riverside meanderings, while slapstick dominates the anarchic "playtime" sequence, which Lester makes all the more hilarious by his use of helicopter shots, unexpected angles and variegated film speeds.
With global takings of $11 million on a £200,000 outlay, A Hard Day's Night changed the visual presentation of pop forever. Moreover, it gave the Beatles a taste for movies. Following the singularly undistinguished Help!, John co-starred in Lester's How I Won The War. Ringo teamed with Peter Sellers for The Magic Christian. George formed HandMade and saved Monty Python's Life Of Brian. And Paul made Give My Regards To Broad Street — and they don't come much funnier than that.
Because Samira Ahmed’s excellent book is part of the BFI Film Classics series, it is worth bringing in the BFI’s sixtieth anniversary examination and tribute to one a film that was revolutionary. “Through the Fab Four to Take That, One Direction and Taylor Swift, the lines between public and private, star and fan, reality and fantasy have been blurry ever since”. Last month was the sixty-second anniversary of the film. Might anything happen in 2029 for its sixty-fifth anniversary? I don’t think A Hard Day’s Night will age or loses its magic, as it is seems more relevant now than it did in 1964:
“The French film critic and director Jacques Rivette once said that “every film is a documentary of its own making”. A Hard Day’s Night captures modern pop stardom as it was being invented. The film’s faux documentary style was partly dictated by necessity: black-and-white film was cheaper, and since the boys had no acting experience, director Richard Lester didn’t want to force them into a situation where they’d have to awkwardly deliver dialogue, or crowbar in excuses to perform songs. This was a situation that Elvis Presley found himself in constantly, and which was already starting to seem passé in 1964.
Screenwriter Alun Owen wrote the script after spending time on the road with the band, taking note of their distinctly Scouse humour, their intimacy and banter, and their individual parts in the group’s dynamic. He wrote a heightened version of each Beatle for them to play. Crucially, Owen was a working-class Welshman who’d grown up in Liverpool, so he understood the group’s vernacular and wrote scenarios and dialogue based on their real experiences, which they would be comfortable delivering.
And unlike Elvis, or Frank Sinatra, or any other pop star on film before, these guys live in a world where The Beatles exist. Their awareness of their fame places them at a distance from it — they’re as amused by it as the audience is.
The scene where John convinces a woman that he’s not, in fact, John Lennon, encapsulates how a person’s celebrity can become divorced from and unrecognisable to the real person.
A woman tells John: “You don’t look like him at all” and John says, to himself: “She looks more like him than I do.”
The film also distinguishes the ‘real’ Beatles by drawing attention to the way that their images are captured, copied and disseminated. Paul’s grandfather (an agent of chaos played by Steptoe and Son’s Wilfrid Bramble) repeatedly asks the boys to autograph a group photo, which he makes forgeries of and attempts to sell. In the press conference scene, George poses for a photographer whose snaps appear on screen as a contact sheet. In the ‘Can’t Buy Me Love’ sequence, the slow motion shots of the band jumping references their already established iconography, particularly Fiona Adams’ photo of the band leaping behind Euston Station, which was used on the cover of the EP Twist and Shout. The band is seen through various TV monitors in the studio’s control room, and there’s a visual gag involving large beetles in the background while the band rehearses on stage. Through editing, mise-en-scene and blocking, the film distinguishes the flesh-and-blood Beatles at its centre, from the two-dimensional avatars most fans were used to seeing.
The level of fame The Beatles experienced during the making of the film was intense and new. Watching it with 60 years of hindsight, in the era of stan culture, phone chucking, and parasocial relationships, it’s striking to see the light-headedness with which the film portrays the intense fandom.
The fans presented a problem for production, and Owen observed how the band’s movements were restricted by the mania surrounding them. But the film’s purpose was to serve Beatlemania, so the feeling of constraint was expressed through surrealism and humour – for example, during ‘I Should Have Known Better’, literally placing the band in a cage while schoolgirls try to touch them like zoo animals.
This attitude seems to have been couched in reality. A documentary called The First US Visit, shot by the Maysles brothers just weeks before production on this film started, shows that, at this stage, The Beatles treated their fame with humour and bemusement. The darker, more dangerous side to fan behaviour had not yet reared its head.
More recent films about pop stars tend to walk a fine line between appreciating fandom – because without it, where would the star be? – and exploring the toll it takes on the artist. Of films about celebrities who have reached the levels of fame comparable to The Beatles, two stand out: One Direction’s This Is Us and Taylor Swift’s Miss Americana.
Both films feature their subjects interacting with fans, but they’re in much more controlled environments, like meet and greets (which are surreal in their own way). Modern celebrities know the double-edged sword of fame: they know that they need to connect with fans, but the implications for their personal safety are on a whole other level to what was considered when The Beatles were filming A Hard Day’s Night. They live in a world that, for better or worse, The Beatles helped usher in. This is all the more tragic when considering that 16 years after filming, John Lennon would be shot and killed by a fan whose warped justification for the act was that Lennon had become, in his unstable mind, “a phoney”.
But this would all happen later. For the time being, John, Paul, George and Ringo took Beatlemania in their stride, building their public personas on the fly. In fact, that carving out of four distinct personas for The Beatles was another invention of Alun Owen. According to Paul Du Noyer (writing in MOJO):
“Owen watched the four personalities and amplified them for effect. Though each of The Beatles would come to find their respective stereotypes stifling, it was an accidental stroke of marketing genius. At that time, the British and American publics had only the vaguest notion of individual Beatles. In fact their defining qualities, to most adult minds, were the identikit mop tops and peculiar accent. It was through A Hard Day’s Night that The Beatles first emerged as four distinct entities, immeasurably adding to the interest and complexity of the group.”
This set the template for the way in which musicians are marketed to this very day, from Take That to the Spice Girls, to BTS and TXT.
Yet the film also goes a long way to reinforce the idea that The Beatles are strongest when they are together as a unit. When Ringo decides to go AWOL, thanks to some meddling by Paul’s grandfather, he proves to be completely inept at navigating the world. He nearly gets into a fight, is rejected by women, and causes minor havoc at a pub. The scene is played for comedy, but it also shows us a glimpse of a world without The Beatles: drab, hostile, devoid of humour. It reinforces the idea that four Beatles are better than one, and the freedom they crave is better experienced as a group. Like Nowell-Smith said: “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.”
A Hard Day’s Night is a bundle of contradictions: a scripted comedy that feels authentic, a celebration of image making that both critiques and revels in the process, a commercial product that’s genuinely artistic. Its lightning-in-a-bottle quality is proven by the fact that it didn’t set a formula: aspects of the film have permeated pop culture separately, but there’s no A Hard Day’s Night 2. That’s fine, because even though the film turns 60 this year, it never gets old”.
With there being talk around The Beatles appearing the biopic films, Rubber Soul getting the Giles Martin treatment, and just the fact that Ringo Starr and Paul McCartney are still massive fans of the band and can tell us first-hand what it was like, I have been thinking about A Hard Day’s Night and what it means to me. A near-perfect film featuring my favourite band, I think it was ahead of its time and had this brilliant script that was given to a brilliant director. How Richard Lester made this huge impact, and what A Hard Day’s Night means today. Anyone who has not seen it, I would implore them to do so. I can’t seem to find it on streaming platforms, but this YouTube video gives us the entire film. Go and get Samira Ahmed's book too, as it is not only a great companion; how she writes about the film is extraordinary and has received glowing reviews like this. I think that The Beatles’ 1964 debut film is one of the most extraordinary things…
EVER committed to film.
