FEATURE: Hip-Hop at Forty-Four: Street Prophets: Musical Progression and Social Inertia

FEATURE:

 

Hip-Hop at Forty-Four:

IN THIS PHOTO: The album cover of Eric B. & Rakim's 1987 Hip-Hop masterpiece, Paid in Full

Street Prophets: Musical Progression and Social Inertia

________

IT is typical of Google that, when searching for results…

pertaining to the forty-fourth anniversary of Hip-Hop; the first options one finds are articles relating to their commemorative ‘doodles’ – a special design/interactive tool that appeared on their search engine a couple of days back. BBC Radio 6 Music celebrated the birth and evolution of Hip-Hop (Hip Hop Hooray) with a day of special programmes yesterday. It was a remarkable, authoritative and passionate examination of a genre that began, pretty much, from one man: Clive Campbell. Better known as DJ Kool Herc; he hosted a back-to-school party in the Bronx, New York on 11th August, 1973. That single, momentous event probably didn’t seem epic or groundbreaking at the time - but it has been credited as the time Hip-Hop was recognised as a genre. Defined by mixing, heavy beats and acute sampling/scratching: it started with modesty but certainly lit a fuse. It would a little while until the first commercial Hip-Hop album - Sugarhill Gang’s Rap Genius - was introduced to the public (in 1979).

IN THIS IMAGE: Ronald Reagan; who was President of America when Hip-Hop assimilated into the mainstream

There are debates as to whether forefathers pre-dated DJ Kool Herc and whether someone else snuck in and sowed the seeds. Conventional wisdom credits DJ Kool Herc, Afrika Bambaataa and Grandmaster Flash as the ‘Holy Trinity’ of Hip-Hop. It is debatable which had a greater effect on the explosion and noticeable nature of Hip-Hop: that back-to-school pioneering event from DJ Kool Herc or the social dissatisfaction that arrived when President Reagan came to the White House in 1981. There were murmurations and groundbreaking albums happening before that time – Rap Genius was the first time Hip-Hop ascended to the mainstream – but there was an acceleration and proliferation of outraged voices stepping up after Reagan’s appointment. I will talk about some of the best albums of the genres and the way the genre has evolved over the years but, for now, a social study. There is a haunting and troubling symmetry when we celebrate Hip-Hop’s birth. The movement/genre recruited its faithful off of the back of governmental ignorance and social poverty – the fact the community, the black community, for the most part, were being trodden on.

By the late-1970s; there was a hyperinflation of the racial divide, social inequality and political tension. Regan’s appointment to office was not exactly the turnaround and redemption many had wished for – being a Republican; he was unlikely to prioritise those less-well-off and struggling. That, back in 1981, caused greater division and cracks in the fabric of U.S. society. Out of the tensions and divides grew a band of artists who articulated, with passion and intelligence, the dissatisfaction and anger being felt by the people of America. Again, we assume it applies to the masses but it was the minority (the black community) who were worst affected – making it seem rather racially-motivated and oppressive. Of course, the whole of America was feeling strain but, as is the case now, there was racial divisionism and social alienation. The affected minority were not getting their voices heard: Hip-Hop was the counterculture explosion that gave its boldest and bravest the platform on which to campaign and sermonise.

IN THIS PHOTO: Scenes of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia/PHOTO CREDIT: Samuel Corum, Andloua Agency and Getty Images

I mentioned how there was a rather ironic appropriateness we are celebrating the formation of Hip-Hop. One cannot ignore the news and the horrifying scenes coming out of Virginia. It is hardly conceivable what we are seeing happening in Charlottesville right now. Look at a BBC article and, be forewarned, there is some upsetting detail. One woman has been killed and many injured after violent clashes and terrorism – a car ploughing through a crowd of people. The sight of people being tossed through the air like a discarded tissue is enough to turn the stomach and cool the blood. I am not sure as to the exact reason for provocation but far-right white ‘supremacists’ must have been orchestrating and planning this riot for many months. Whether motivated by President Trump’s rhetoric concerning making America 'great again' – there has been nothing that could justify or rationalise this insane and degraded event. One, sadly, assumes there are racists in certain parts of America – the least-evolved and backwoods parts of inbred states!

IN THIS PHOTO: A shocking image from Charlottesville/PHOTO CREDIT: AP

The animals of Charlottesville that have brought the town into disrepute care not for human life or morals: their intention was to show, in some twisted way, why whites are a superior race. Trump’s response to the atrocities has been piecemeal and pathetic! In a rather aloof and unconvincing way; he has condemned the far-right and made it clear America will not tolerate such happenings. That is funny as one could easily blame Trump for this happening in the first place. If he wants to unleash "fire and fury" (as he promised the leader of North Korea, recently) then why not direct it squarely at the abdomens of the racists?! I say ‘abdomens’, because one assumes their brains and genitals are too microscopic to be affected by any weaponised reaction. It is sickening, in 2017, having to witness such hatred and division – that sound familiar?!

IN THIS PHOTO: President Donald J. Trump

If anything; it is worse now than it was at the peak of Hip-Hop. I am confident the reaction from the music world will be swift and unforgiving – barrels being unloaded in the direction of the guilty and Trump. The backlash and outrage on social media have proved how these ‘people’ – that can be seen in their modernised K.K.K. outfits – do not speak for the rest of the world. Even if these riots are confined to a small part of America: how can we be sure it will not spread and inspire like-minded factions to mobilise a similar battalion in another part of the nation?! We can’t, you know, but it seems shocking we should have to contemplate. In the late-1970s/early-1980s, there was balkanisation, economic gulfs and neighbourhood poverty – once-proud areas being reduced to ghettos because of the government’s cold and ignorant views of America. They, then, were unaware of ‘real’ American and how the honest, hardworking citizens lived. It seems, forty years down the line, they are as deluded and naïve as ever.

IN THIS PHOTO: Former President Barack Obama

One knows Trump will do nothing to quell the venom and assured his people – the fact his predecessor, Barack Obama, presently and retrospectively, seems to offer more hope is a sign of how scary Trump is a President. I shall get away from the issue but I know the titans of Hip-Hop will not let this one go. One imagines the likes of Kendrick Lamar, Prophets of Rage and Run the Jewels are inking up their pens and scribbling furiously. I will return to the social divisions and stagnation later but, before coming to the best Hip-Hop albums through the years, I wanted to source an article I have just discovered. Talking about Hip-Hop’s pioneer, DJ Kool Herc; a piece from The Guardian (in 2011) highlighted how much the Hip-Hop community owes to their forefather. Suffering illness during this time; the piece scorned those who did not play benefits and raise money to fund Herc’s treatment:

“There are few pioneers of any musical form who could truly be considered the master architect of a genre – but Herc has that distinction. Hip-hop doesn't just have a family tree, it has a birth certificate: the hand-drawn flyer for the party Herc threw in the basement of 1520 Sedgwick Avenue in the Bronx on 13 August 1973, which so many people turned up to, they had to move it outside, to the nearby Cedar Park. His "merry-go-round" approach – extending the percussion break by playing a second copy of the same record on one turntable as soon as the break had finished on the other deck – gave the world the concept of the breakbeat. Breakdancing, rapping over breakbeats, sampling and loop-based dance music all began that night. Although he is generally seen alongside Afrika Bambaataa and Grandmaster Flash as one third of hip-hop's founding "holy trinity", Herc is first among equals. While Bam was the "Master of Records", his encyclopaedic knowledge of different music adding to the emerging genre's stylistic and sonic palette, and Flash was the innovator whose aptitude for electronics enabled his invention of cutting, cueing and (perhaps: his protege Grand Wizard Theodore claims the invention, though Flash demurs) scratching, Herc was the one who laid the foundations on which they built.

 Yet unlike practically everyone who followed him, Herc did not manage to monetise his innovations. Bam and Flash both formed groups with rappers, got signed to key independent labels, and made worldwide hit records. By contrast, Herc was more about the size of the sound system and the atmosphere of the parties he threw, neither of which were things he could duplicate and sell. He stayed in the rec rooms and parks, rocking the beats for the people of hip-hop's epicentre, paying little attention to DJ innovators or the politics of the record industry. Maybe he paid the price for not trying to forever stay on the cutting edge of the genre he accidentally founded: but if you were putting it in the sort of language rappers have tended to use down the years, he never sold out, and he kept it real. His prize for this was a ton of respect, but virtually no cash.

IN THIS PHOTO: Run-D.M.C. and Posse captured in Hollis, Queens (New York) by Janette Beckman in 1984

With the honourable exceptions of Public Enemy and the Chemical Brothers, it looks like pretty much anyone involved in the business of hip-hop, breakbeats or sample-based music owes Herc big time. Jay-Z once rapped that his approach to the industry was to make it pay for the way it mistreated hip-hop's innovators ("I'm overchargin' niggas for what they did to the Cold Crush," he wrote in Izzo, referring to the Cold Crush Brothers, whose leader, Grand Master Caz, had his rhymes used by the Sugar Hill Gang on the first ever rap single) – but words only go so far”.

I will not sub-categorise and headline the segments of this piece but one must forgive that lack of discipline – the fists are still clenched reading the updates coming out of Virginia. Although there is utter f*cking chaos and insanity happening in the U.S. – nothing new there! – it seems like a new, intent wave of Hip-Hop will form. There have been pieces that have studied the etymology of Hip-Hop and the neighbourhoods/people that helped build its foundations – and ensuring it reached the masses. I know the next year-or-so will lead to some explosive and pioneering Hip-Hop albums.

To me, the best Hip-Hop albums were created in the 1980s. It is not shocking considering the factors that contributed to the rise of the genre – artists reacting to the dislocation and instability around them. Aside from confident raps, scratching and socially-aware lyrics: one of the key corners of the Hip-Hop sound has been sampling. It is common in almost all of the best Hip-Hop albums of all time. During the 1980s, there were some fantastic Hip-Hop albums springing up. Criminal Minded by 1987; Run-D.M.C.’s Raising Hell; 3rd Bass’ The Cactus Album; LL Cool J’s Bigger and Deffer. Those are all enduring and defining works that have survived time and influence artists today. One of the biggest albums of the decade – that did not necessarily go overboard on sampling – is/was N.W.A.’s Straight Outta Compton. A humorous album that many felt raised more hell than it did answers: it was provoked and propelled by the same anger and problems that kick-started the Hip-Hop movement. It is an angry and evocative work that remains the group’s most-famous record. Look at those heavyweight Hip-Hop-samplers and I bring to you Beastie Boys, De La Soul; Public Enemy - and Eric B. and Rakim. The latter can be seen as one of the first albums to use sampling in such a way as to unify disparate genres and artists.

IN THIS PHOTO: The cover art to Beastie Boys' album, Paul's Boutique

Paul’s Boutique arrived in 1989 and many can argue it is a finer album. Paid in Full came two years earlier and is considered one of the greatest albums ever. It, not only gave Hip-Hop artists the confidence to use sampling in their work, but directly nodded to where the genre came from. One of the most remarkable things about Hip-Hop is the fact it is not an organic and lab-created style of music. Paid in Full is credited as a landmark album of Hip-Hop’s golden age. Rakim's rapping, which pioneered the use of internal rhymes in Hip-Hop, set a higher standard of lyricism in the genre and served as a template for future rappers. The album's heavy sampling by Eric B. became influential in Hip-Hop production. It is a benchmark, for sure, and one that assimilated Jazz textures and multiple sounds into the Hip-Hop boiling pot – a gauntlet that their contemporaries learnt from and integrated into their own work. 3 Feet High and Rising arrived (in 1989) and was another one of those late-1980s albums that took from Paid in Full and nodded to those golden pioneers.

IN THIS PHOTO: De La Soul

De La Soul employed humour, a unique positivity and uplift that seemed to contrast a lot of the Hip-Hop material at the time. Fellow Hip-Hop legends like Public Enemy would take a more direct and aggressive road to realisation – De La Soul seemed like their Angel (to The Devil), The skill and breadth of De La Soul’s sampling meant 3 Feet High and Rising was listed as one of the finest albums of the 1980s. Jazz, Jazz-Rock and Pop were all poured into the mix. If not as socially-conscious as other albums of the time: it balanced humour and seriousness; put disparate songs – Hall and Oates, Steely Dan and George Clinton were all sampled – together in one. Beastie Boys’ 1989-album, Paul’s Boutique shouldn’t have received the mixed critical reception it did. Considering the like of De La Soul and Eric B. and Rakim had shown how accessible heavily-sampling albums could be; there was a comparative lack of empathy towards the New York trio’s masterpiece. It took years for true acclaim and realisation but, in that wonderful era, it seemed like a natural thing. Using different samples than De La Soul:

IN THIS PHOTO: Public Enemy

Using different samples than De La Soul:Beastie Boys were the vocal/lyrical link between Public Enemy and De La Soul. They had the anger and swaggering attitude but laced lashings of wit and humour into their music. Their rhymes are legendary and their rapping ability cannot be faulted. Hip-Hop artists at the time were using older styles of music and modernising them for new audiences. The same way we can trace modern Rock back to Rock and Roll of the 1950s: one can look at styles like Jazz and Soul as vanguards and inspirations for Hip-Hop. The fluidity and experimentation of Jazz seemed like the natural parent of a genre synonymous with its flows, inventiveness and boldness. It was Public Enemy’s magnum opus, It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back. It seems strangely prescient and clairvoyant. An album, nearly thirty years on, seems to represent a sense of racism and outrage.

With Chuck D still in circulation (with Prophets of Rage) one imagines his mind is starting to work on new material. In 1989, the Hip-Hop world had not witnessed anything as articulate, groundbreaking and impactful as Public Enemy’s masterpiece. Maybe N.W.A. had the same anger and aggression but did not channel it into anything as fascinating and relevant as It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back. With this L.P; The band wanted to write a Hip-Hop equivalent of Marvin Gaye’s What’s Going On. Whilst their debut, Yo! Bum Rush the Show was largely shunned in favour of the R&B/Rock mainstream in 1987 – there was no ignoring their follow-up in the wake of a Hip-Hop takeover. The Bomb Squad, the group’s production team, produced thick layers to compliment Chuck D’s fiery lyrics; Flavor Flav’s lighter interjections and a myriad of sounds – breakbeats and scratches; incredible samples and some of the most intense performances on record. It remains one of the best albums of all-time and propelled Hip-Hop into the 1990s.

Not only did It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back inspire a generation and unify ample samples with a unique identity: the album, in itself, has been sampled by the likes of Madonna (Justify My Love) and Beastie Boys (Egg Man). Not to fly through the ensuing three decades but we have covered the best Hip-Hop albums. The 1990s picked up the mantle and, whilst social concerns and divisions were not the same as the decade previous; the legacy laid down by Beastie Boys and Public Enemy gave contemporaries the confidence to use more sampling and push boundaries. Nas’ Illmatic, Dr. Dre’s The Chronic and A Tribe Called Quest’s The Low End Theory took the origins of Jazz and Hip-Hop and updated it for the early-1990s. One can bring in Funk and Soul that, together with Jazz, relies on a sense of flow, improvisation and rhythm – which were being appropriated and adapted by the Hip-Hop masters of the 1990s. Mos Def’s Black on Both Sides and Lauryn Hill’s The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill were two of the defining works of the late-1990s.

IMAGE CREDIT: Roman Genn

Many assume Hip-Hop to be male-dominated and, whilst true to an extent, Hill’s sole solo album showed there was a generation of female innovators unafraid to join the male-heavy landscape of Hip-Hop. Hill, like her peers, addressed issues affecting her people/community but looked at love and personal demons. She showed it was possible to mix social commentary with more traditional songs and create a stunning work of art. Hill was bringing in Reggae, Roots and Soul (more than Jazz and Funk) – showing how many styles Hip-Hop was inspired by. As opposed to the crate-digging samplers of the 1990s – Lauryn Hill was among a new breed relying more on original compositions but still being innovative and expressive with regards sounds and genres. Aside from the occasional piece of genius sampling album – DJ Shadow’s Entroducing…… in 1996 – the more modern brand of Hip-Hop was defined by a grittiness and directness.

More in common with the acceleration and passionate deliveries of Public Enemy: the best Hip-Hop albums of the '00s have retained the affectionate nods to the past but updated Hip-Hop. Take modern geniuses like Kanye West and Eminem and you hear them dip into the annals of music’s past and scatter Soul, Rock and early-Hip-Hop samples into their music. Eminem is one of the few white Hip-Hop artists of the last to hit the mainstream in the last few decades – showing it is a genre that is not confined in terms of race. Social poverty affected the black community, and still does, in the 1980s – hence its popularisation and explosion – but modern Hip-Hop artists are reacting to the breakup and fragmentation in their nation – something that affects everyone. I have mentioned mostly American artists but, aside from a few British acts like The Streets, the most compelling Hip-Hop albums from all time have been American.

Eminem’s The Marshall Mathers LP arrived right at the start of the '00S and mixed humour, outright aggression – the author lambasted for his homophobic, misogynistic and sexist lyrics – and incredible confidence. The extraordinary raps and incredible flows made the album of the defining works of the decade. The likes of Eminem and Kanye West were addressing issues affection society of the time. Eminem, when he was not rallying against lovers and accusers, was talking about the pressures of fame and nature of popularity. Kanye West, on The College Dropout, talked about materialism and sexual identity. It brought in samples of Michael Bolton, Aretha Franklin and Marvin Gaye (among others) and ensured Soul was still part of the Hip-Hop landscape. Eminem was using Rock samples/strings and, between them, created some of the most astonishing, inventive and compelling music of the decade.

IN THIS PHOTO: The album cover of Kendrick Lamar's 2015 album, To Pimp a Butterfly

Outkast’s phenomenal double album Speakerboxxx/The Love Below (2003) was a landmark record and one of the best records of the '00s. Kanye West’s Yeezus; Frank Ocean’s Channel Orange and Kendrick Lamar’s To Pimp a Butterfly show there is plenty of life and inspiration in modern Hip-Hop. One can draw a line between Lamar’s 2015 epic and albums by Public Enemy and N.W.A. There is a lot of anger and fracture in America: ensuring this is represented through a medium like Hip-Hop is essential. It is encouraging seeing Hip-Hop artists retain the components and D.N.A. of the pioneers. Kendrick Lamar, on To Pimp a Butterfly, mixed Jazz elements and instrumentation against tougher and tauter raps – that balance of defiant verses and smoother horns went into a remarkable record.

IN THIS PHOTO: An exciting new British Hip-Hop talent, Loyle Carner

I opened by looking at the tensions and problems affecting Virginia right now. The wreckage and bloodshed of yesterday will take a long time to clean. The stains and repercussions of the horror will endure and there is a lesson for America to learn from. If its music and Hip-Hop artists have evolved and fostered something inspiring and beautiful – they are being let down by their government and worst elements. It is the minorities (black community) affected and afflicted by hatred from another minority (the far-right). In the same manner President Reagan compelled anger and rebellion in the early-1980s: President Trump seems to share a lot of the same components. It is scary seeing two very similar leaders oversee racial tensions and division. Reagan’s leadership (or lack of...) led to the commercial birth of Hip-Hop: current violence and aggression will, in my view, lead to a new wave of Hip-Hop meaning and aggression. Artists will not idly stand by and watch these kinds of things go down. It takes an inept President and the monkey-brained faction of racists to provoke worldwide condemnation and revulsion. It seems, since the birth of Hip-Hop forty-four years ago, society has really not progressed and learned from its mistakes. It is the hate-fuelled minorities that are dragging things down. I am pleased seeing Hip-Hop celebrated and given proper honour but worry those pioneers and innovators will be spinning in their commercial graves knowing their important and powerful messages have not been taken seriously.

IN THIS PHOTO: Hip-Hop pioneer, Afrika Bambaataa

Yes...they have inspired musicians and changed the fabric of music but they are being ignored by those who have the power to change policies and ill practices. Let us hope it does not take another racist rampage like yesterday’s for us to realise more needs to be done; how timely the landmark Hip-Hop albums are – and where we need to improve. Against all the sourness and disgust that is being felt around the globe; let’s be thankful for DJ Kool Herc and that incredible night forty-four years ago. He helped create and inspire a genre of music that, to me and many, is one of the finest and most inspiring. It has evolved over the decades but produced some of the greatest albums in history. Long may that continue and, as we remember those affected in Virginia; let us pay homage to a remarkable genre of music – created by a phenomenal human. Tonight, you know, let’s all get a drink in hand and…

IN THIS PHOTO: DJ Kool Herc

RAISE a glass to him!

FEATURE: Elvis Presley: The King of Rock and Roll

FEATURE:

 

Elvis Presley: 

 The King of Rock and Roll

________

IN three days; it will be forty years since Elvis Presley…

left the world. Fortunately, I was not alive to hear that sad news because God knows how extraordinary and life-changing it would have been for the people – not only his fans but those who did not recognise his music! One cannot celebrate and talk about Presley without talking about him as a phenomenon. Nearly every other musician who has ever lived could be seen as such: that is not the case with Presley. I guess the only other musician death that would have had that biblical impact as John Lennon. I feel, unlike Lennon, Presley stewarded in and invented what we understand to be Rock. His Rock and Roll/Blues mixtures were unheard of and completely revolutionary. With the likes of Chuck Berry; he helped put Rock and Roll into the mainstream and reinvented music of the time. That is not an exaggerated and one cannot underestimate the importance of his debut album, Elvis Presley. Before I go on, as an overview and distillation unfamiliar with Presley’s birth and rise, a Wikipedia summary of his life:

“Elvis Aaron Presley[a] (January 8, 1935 – August 16, 1977) was an American singer and actor. Regarded as one of the most significant cultural icons of the 20th century, he is often referred to as the "King of Rock and Roll" or simply "the King".

Presley was born in Tupelo, Mississippi, and relocated to Memphis, Tennessee with his family when he was 13 years old. His music career began there in 1954, when he recorded a song with producer Sam Phillips at Sun Records. Accompanied by guitarist Scotty Moore and bassist Bill Black, Presley was an early popularizer of rockabilly, an uptempo, backbeat-driven fusion of country music and rhythm and blues. RCA Victor acquired his contract in a deal arranged by Colonel Tom Parker, who managed the singer for more than two decades. Presley's first RCA single, "Heartbreak Hotel", was released in January 1956 and became a number-one hit in the United States. He was regarded as the leading figure of rock and roll after a series of successful network television appearances and chart-topping records. His energized interpretations of songs and sexually provocative performance style, combined with a singularly potent mix of influences across color lines that coincided with the dawn of the Civil Rights Movement, made him enormously popular—and controversial.

PHOTO CREDIT: Gillian G. Gaar (from the book, Elvis: The Legend)

In November 1956, Presley made his film debut in Love Me Tender. In 1958, he was drafted into military service. He resumed his recording career two years later, producing some of his most commercially successful work before devoting much of the 1960s to making Hollywood films and their accompanying soundtrack albums, most of which were critically derided. In 1968, following a seven-year break from live performances, he returned to the stage in the acclaimed televised comeback special Elvis, which led to an extended Las Vegas concert residency and a string of highly profitable tours. In 1973, Presley featured in the first globally broadcast concert via satellite, Aloha from Hawaii. On August 16, 1977, he suffered a heart attack in his Graceland estate, and died as a result. His death came in the wake of many years of prescription drug abuse.

Presley is one of the most celebrated and influential musicians of the 20th century. Commercially successful in many genres, including pop, blues and gospel, he is one of the best-selling solo artists in the history of recorded music, with estimated record sales of around 600 million units worldwide.[5] He won three Grammys, also receiving the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award at age 36, and has been inducted into multiple music halls of fame”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

That is, of course, a brief biography – the webpage gives a lot more detail and depth – but it is a pretty good assessment of a true legend. Many call Presley the King of Rock and Roll – I cannot argue against that! To me, he is someone I appreciate retrospectively and vicariously. I was not alive during his lifetime so did not get to experience the brilliance and rush of his musical genius. The artwork to Elvis Presley’s debut album has been much-copied – The Clash on London Calling, for example – and it was a record that spent ten weeks at number one on the Billboard Top Pop Albums chart. In 1956, there were rumblings of Rock and Roll. People had heard of Buddy Holly but there was nobody who propelled the genre into the spotlight and helped changed the landscape of modern culture.

The young, beautiful and peerless talent of Presley was a fire-breath of revelation at a time where there were so much beige and ‘old-fashioned’ sounds. Here, a cool and swaggering God created the first million-selling album of the genre. No denying how necessary and universal his album was. Heartbreak Hotel was a monster hit for Presley so, following that success; RCA wanted its promising star to put an album out. Presley and his band sojourned to the studio but, before they did, penned moments and lines that would appear on that decade-defining record. In the 1950s, today I guess, there was that pressure to release the ‘best’ songs as singles and have ‘lesser’ tracks as album material. The record company wanted those big songs that appealed to the young – to get the dancefloors moving and the diners/clubs jumping. The recording of that debut was not that smooth. Presley had a few smashes to put in but, requiring a minimum length of time/amount of songs forced The King to put five unreleased songs onto the record – including Just Because and Trying’ to Get to You. Covers formed the album but the reason Elvis Presley was such a landmark was the way it transformed the original material.

Money Honey (Jessie Stone) and I’m Counting on You (Don Robertson) were turned into near-religious experiences in Presley’s hands. He showed he could tackle R&B, Rock and Roll and Blues and craft his own unique voice. Even a cover of Little Richard’s Tutti Fruitti sounded new and reborn – some honour given the stature of its creator. The entire album was released as singles - which meant the public has full exposure and access to that incredible release. At the time, the debut album was a revolution and revelation. Today, there is literally no way of quantifying the effect and influence that single album has had on the modern landscape. In the way it changed the 1950s and popular culture: that, in turn, influenced 1960s artists and the biggest artists of the time – that has passed through the generation and brought music to where it is today.

PHOTO CREDIT: Gillian G. Gaar (from the book, Elvis: The Legend)

Subsequent albums like Elvis (1956) – with the likes of Rip It Up and Long Tall Sally included – it was another smash and commercial hit for the Presley. In 1956, Presley was the first artist to see both of his albums hit the number one spot in the charts. The fact he managed to produce two albums in the space of a year would seem almost alien today – quite a few artists had that productivity in the 1950s and 1960s. One could argue there was an immense aesthetic appeal to the young singer. Today, Presley would have to battle through hordes of iPhone-wielding teens – not giving him any eye contact – but, back in the 1950s, he was an absolute sensation. It was not only his natural beauty but the incredible voice that hooked in the fans. There has been nobody that has managed to rival that mix of husky depth and youthful vigour. There are few ‘unique’ singers today – most sound like someone to an extent – but Presley certainly had no equals. Couple that with a stage presence and hip-swivelling allure that topped off that true Rock package and one had a ready-made icon. It seemed to happen right from the off. So many contemporaries had to work hard to get the same kind of success but Presley was thrust into the limelight.

The young star grew up inspired by Gospel music and, according to his mother, from the age of two, the boy would dance in the aisles of the Assembly of God church in Tupelo. He attended all-night Gospel sing-alongs later and this all cumulated in Presley’s initial musical incarnation as part of The Statesmen – emotive and thrilling singing from lads dressed in dapper and eye-catching suits. It is unsurprising Presley’s stage demeanour would captivate and move as easily as it did. That spiritual and religious affinity flowed through the blood (and groin) of the legend. During the 1950s and 1960s, of course, there was segregation, race riots and racism – look at the news today and we have not progressed that far! – so it was quite unconventional for artists to back black artists and show a love of genres like Gospel and R&B. That race ‘issue’ materialised when Presley would conduct radio interviews. Many would call thinking he was a black artist – given segregation and racial tensions; that was a no-no – and that might seem flattering to many. Luckily, Pressley was not as ignorant as many of his fellow Americans and showed his respect and support of the black community.

This openness and universal love were reciprocated and, before long, Presley was a big film star getting roles in Jailhouse Rock (1957), G.I. Blues (1960) and Blue Hawaii (1961). The fact the musician was having films written for him is something we could not imagine in this day and age – there is no star that has that demand and popularity. If Presley’s acting chops were impressive (if not on a par with James Dean) he certainly had the same cool and command as the Hollywood idols of the day. His early-1960s albums might not have been as meteoric and popular as his debut – still commanding enormous respect – but his 1960 album, Elvis Is Back! can be considered one of his finest. Fever, The Girl of My Best Friend and Like a Baby, like his debut, was ground-breaking and conic.

IN THIS PHOTO: Presley in Jailhouse Rock (1957)

If his 1956-debut was marked by its fusion and progression of Rock and Roll: Elvis Is Back! bonded more to Pop and was the start of a more Pop-driven period for Presley. It was this album where Presley’s voice hardened and the arrangements became more sophisticated; he was tackling a wider range of songs and experimenting with new genres – performing ballads and love songs alongside the megahertz-thrill one heard four years earlier. It seemed like the album title was not ironic: it was very much a comeback and regeneration. Aside from film soundtracks – Blue Hawaii and G.I. Blues in the early-1960s – there was not a lot of studio action from Presley before the 1970s. That film stardom and increasing popularity drew his attention elsewhere and, conceivably, started a course that would end in tragedy.

It is hard to say how linked increased fame was to his untimely death but there was a lot of pressure on his shoulders. Growing larger – in terms of success and girth – meant health problems and creative dips followed. The world had never experienced a phenomenon like Elvis Presley – and have not since – so it was understandable the megastar took advantage of the acclaim and demands. Back to his debut years and it important to note just how needed Presley’s introduction to music was. Artists like Little Richard praised how Presley let black music through. At a time, when there was segregation and homogenisation in the music industry – certain genres being heard by black audiences; other genres reserved for white people – Presley broke barriers and helped put R&B into the wider arena. President Jimmy Carter recognised his pioneering music and how his rebellious attitude electrified people of the time and turned him into an instant icon.

IN THIS PHOTO: Graceland

That blend of sexuality, showmanship and explosive music was the catalyst for a social change and betterment. It is hard to say how influential Presley was with regards changes in attitudes to black Americans but it is clear his music transformed the world. If early albums like A Date with Elvis (1959) and For LP Fans Only (1959) showed how prolific and consistent he was in the 1950s: the years that followed saw less music but no real slowing of his popularity and work. Presley was putting more time in his film career and live gigs. The 1972 album, He Touched Me, was, debatably, the most-successful album of Presley’s 1970s. His third and final Gospel album showed a focus and quality previous albums lacked and his final album, Moody Blue, contained some pearls. I have not even mentioned Presley’s famed and hallowed home of Graceland. It has seen millions of tourists flock in worship; Paul Simon talked about it on the Graceland album – it is the most-revered and iconic musical home ever (more so than Prince’s Paisley Park and Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch).

IN THIS PHOTO: The ‘Jungle Room’ at Graceland - where Presley and friends recorded music/PHOTO CREDIT: Gillian G. Gaar (from the book, Elvis: The Legend)

It is a monument to an artist who managed to transform music in ways we cannot fully appreciate. I shall not go into his final hours – for they are grotesque and appalling sad – and his romances and celebrity lifestyle. It is the music, image and magic that elevated a promising young singer to the King of Rock and Roll. That incredible debut ignited and sparked a Rock and Roll riot; later albums helped popularise and evolve Pop and Gospel – at every stage, in every decade, Presley was transforming music and breaking boundaries. That incredible personality helped bring physicality, emotion and incredible candour to the music. Listen to songs like In the Ghetto and one gets shivers and shocks – it is a marvellous and haunting rendition that showcases how tender and transcendent the master could be. The fact Presley could awe when talking about social poverty as he could something as (relatively) shallow as jukebox joints and young romance – how many of today’s artists can say they managed that?!

Live albums such as 1970’s On Stage showed what a captivating and accomplished live performer Presley was. From his Vegas period through to his return to that Memphis sound: the King of Rock and Roll managed to cast himself as that casino showman or pastor without much strain. He had these guides and period that reflected his progression from the Rock and Roll innovator to this glitzy showman. Maybe the Vegas era did have a hand in his addiction to food and drugs; that pressure and fame meant Presley self-medicated and self-destructed to an extent. There is something sad and tragic realising he was only forty-two when he died. Who knows how far he could have gone and where he would reach was he better safeguarded and advised. It is those live shows, in my mind, that perfectly demonstrated why Presley is an icon whose importance and legacy cannot be disputed. In a few days, we will mark forty years without him in the world: a timely reminder of all the terrific music he left behind. From Hound Dog and Love Me Tender (1956) to Jailhouse Rock (1957); It’s Now or Never (1960) and Crying in the Chapel (1965) – such a range of iconic tracks and wonderful moments. Strip away Colonel Parker and the Aberbachs – great band name, by the way! – and the control they exerted over Presley’s career (and, how, that could have led to his untimely demise) and the 'Memphis Mafia' – the group of friends who Presley discovered in the early-1960s and opened his world to excess and degradation – and let’s focus on the music and legacy. I feel nobody has left a bigger mark on the world than Elvis Presley.

IN THIS PHOTO: Presley in Jailhouse Rock (1957)

From that monumental debut to his incredible raft of number-one singles: nobody has done more to push music forward. That can be contested but I stand by that assertion. Regardless of your appreciation of the music: you cannot ignore the importance of Presley and what he did to music. It would be hard enough breaking boundaries now: in the 1950s, against a tide of racial segregation, he managed to, in a way, unify black and white communities but de-segregation music. That was noted by politicians and legendary peers; in a way, it gave people like Paul Simon the courage to do likewise in the 1980s – when he performed with Ladysmith Black Mambazo during Apartheid-era South Africa (for the Graceland album). He has sold more than a billion records; broken more than a billion hearts but, in sheer terms of numbers…

THERE is no one as spectacular and influential as him.

FEATURE: Busking and the Road to Success: Change Is Gonna Come?

FEATURE:

 

Busking and the Road to Success: 

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

Change Is Gonna Come?

________

IF you’ll forgive the pen-laden cringe of the title’s sensibilities…

I wanted to address a side of the music industry that has caught my mind recently. Living where I do; unfortunately, one does come across buskers whose quality and worth are not exactly sky-high. Sure, there are some occasional standouts but, by and large, when I am situated, in busking terms, seems to be stuck in the 1940s. Maybe it is a reaction to the coolness/demographics of the area or a real lack of any ambition – getting people smiling rather than offering any depth, quality or credibility. If you are performing on the street to raise fun, that is okay, but I find myself travelling to the city in order to discoverer the decent and worthy buskers. There is a codified legislation – sternly known as Buskers’ Code – that details the rules and regulations all buskers must adhere to:

Where to busk

·         Busking is legal on public land and there are lots of great places to busk in London.

·         All pitches operate differently. Chat to local buskers to get the lowdown.

·         If you trying out a new area, talk to local busker, businesses and traders. You are less likely to get a complaint.

·         Let people get past. There should be space to push a piano past you and your audience - even at busy times.

·         If your audience blocks a doorway, market stall, pavement, ATM or loo, please stop and clear the blockage! You may want to try a bigger pitch or adapt your act for a smaller audience.

·         If there isn’t a suitable space, wait for one to become free. Ask other buskers if there's a queue you can join.

·         If a performer is waiting for your pitch please share it. On really popular pitches this could mean sharing after one hour or less.

·         Avoid sound clash! Acts involving sound should have lots of space between them.

IN THIS PHOTO: Mercy Grace (one of the competitors at this year's GIGS: Big Busk)

Your Performance

·         Your performance will have an impact on people nearby. Please be aware of this and be willing to move or adjust your performance if necessary.

·         Please don’t cause offence or humiliation.

Sound

·         The biggest cause of complaints is sound. Sound can travel a long way and go high into the air. Many busking locations are surrounded by flats, shops, offices or hotels. Because the people inside can’t walk away, please make sure your volume doesn't bother them.

·         As a rule - keep your volume just above the level of background street noise and check that it is not distorted.

·         Please don’t repeat music in the same location. Acts with varied content are much more popular.

·         Some sounds have a big impact on people. If your act has loud, bass heavy or percussive sounds, please monitor your volume regularly, vary your music and limit your time at each location.

·         Keep backing tracks unobtrusive and turn them off when you’re not performing.

Equipment

·         Make sure no-one could trip over your equipment.

·         Never leave equipment unattended.

·         Keep it safe! Check out our guidance page if your act involves anything risky (e.g. fire, knives, high wire, unicycle, diabolo, juggling).

·         Please don't cover your face (e.g. by wearing a mask) as this puts people off talking to you if there is a problem.

If you use fixtures such as furniture, lamp-posts or railings, or you draw on the ground, please get permission beforehand and make sure nothing gets damaged.

·         Please keep the pitch clean and tidy-up afterwards.

Collecting Money

·         Performers can accept donations but the public must never feel obliged to pay.

·         You can give away CDs or other items, but you cannot charge a fee for them. To sell items for a fee you need a street trading licence.

·         If you are collecting for charity you'll need a permit.

Resolving Problems

Talking with the performer is the starting point for solving all busking related problems. Unless there is an imminent risk to the performer or others, they should be given the chance to change their performance so that it follows the Buskers' Code.

Enforcement action should only be taken once the following three steps have been taken:

·         STEP 1 - Don't wait until you're irate! If a performer or group is causing a problem it can usually be resolved quickly and amicably by talking. Where possible, wait for a suitable break before talking to the performer(s). Introduce yourself and explain the impact that their performance is having on you. Ask the performer if they know about the Buskers' Code and refer them to Busk in London website.

·         STEP 2 - If you have spoken to the performer(s) and the problem continues, please contact you local authority. This might be via an on-street warden/officer or by calling council hotline. They will decided what steps to take, which may be enforcement.

The Law and Enforcement

Is busking legal?

Yes - busking on public land is legal in most places. However there are some exceptions:

·         The London Borough of Camden has introduced a bylaw that requires acts with music or amplification to have a busking licence. If you perform without one you could be arrested and have your equipment seized.

·         Uxbridge Town Centre in the London Borough of Hillingdon has introduced a bylaw that requires all acts using the four town centre pitches to have a busking licence. If you perform without one you could be arrested and have your equipment seized.

·         The financial district of the City of London (known as the Square Mile) allows performers but does not allow money to be collected in public places.

·         Some parks and squares have bylaws that don't allow busking.

·         Private land owners may have their own policy on busking and you may require permission from the landowner. It is often hard to tell private from public land, so please check with a local warden or business or contact Busk in London if you are unsure.

·         Private busking schemes that have entry requirements, such as auditions, permits or licences, include: the London Underground Busking Scheme; some pitches at Covent Garden; and the Southbank Centre Busking Scheme (between the London Eye and Hungerford Bridge).

IN THIS PHOTO: Dawson

Anti-social behaviour

·         If your behaviour is unreasonable and you are having a persistent, detrimental effect on the quality of life of people in the area, you will receive a verbal warning.

·         If you carry on, you could be issued with a formal warning letter, followed by a Community Protection Notice under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act (2014).

·         If you breach the notice, you could be fined or have your equipment seized.

That is, actually, a simplified truncation of the full ins-and-outs. If one wants to play their music on the streets of London; it is not quite as romantic and easy as the likes of Jerry Rafferty and Ralph McTell romanticise – the ease one can work their craft and discover some great music. The reason I raise this article is the discrepancies between town and city; why people busk and whether it can open doors – or if it is a way for musicians to cut their teeth and get first-hand feedback. One of the incongruous aspects of my local busking scene is how unregulated it seems to be. Anyone can busk which creates a couple of issues: the high streets can, especially at the weekend, be awash with ill-fitting sounds that cause some hostile reactions. One might move down one section and hear Hokum bands covering relatively modern songs with all the cheesy charm and jug-blowing coolness one might expect from counties away from London. A few metres down the street and there will be a wannabe X Factor warbler or droning, sonorous Folk singer – mangling some classics and draining the emotion from them.

One is ‘treated to’/threatened with’ so many different performers in the space of a few seconds. Other than the fact the quality is seriously questionable – so many musicians covering songs badly is not going to get me heading for the wallet – it makes me wonder the reasons behind this. Unregulated performances give freedom for artists to ply their trade on the street but does it create a culture of over-saturation? I walk down some streets and find myself inundated with crooning, strumming and sounds of various offensiveness. Even if one discovers a gem down a side-street; that is often washed away by a caterwauling singer a few yards down the road. London’s rigid and rigorous book of rules ensures their buskers are selected in terms of quality and potential.

IN THIS PHOTO: The cast of Once; busking at Leicester Square Tube/PHOTO CREDIT: Matt Crockett

I remember a few friends of mine auditioning for Busk London and trying to secure a spot on the London Underground. It is a competitive and much-contested process that sees musicians battle for converted spots in some of the capital’s prime locations. I will come to look at the ‘goods’ and ‘bads’ of busking but, considering London, I want to introduce a piece from TimeOut London written a few years ago:

“Actually, it’s pretty hard to compete as a busker in general. The tube is out of bounds for newbies. There are currently 280 licensed buskers on the Underground in a TfL-run scheme. It’s proved so popular since its inception in 2003 that it now attracts 4,000 applications when auditions for new licences are held every two years.

Above ground, the outlook isn’t much sunnier. We’ve got away with playing music freely in Trafalgar Square without being moved on by the authorities. But we’ve been lucky. ‘There are times when the police come round Trafalgar Square and tell everyone to stop without any reason,’ says Olly Corpe, one of The King’s Parade, the quartet arrested in Leicester Square. ‘It’s really strange. It depends on the day, it depends on the officers on duty. Sometimes there’s complete hostility towards you.’

Part of the problem is the lack of a citywide consensus on how authorities and the police should treat buskers. For example, The King’s Parade were carted away under the Metropolitan Police Act, an obscure piece of legislation from 1839. They weren’t formally charged according to Corpe: ‘When we got to the police station the officer in charge didn’t even know what the Metropolitan Police Act was.’ Still, it was later defended by the Met in a statement to press. The reason? ‘There is strong evidence that this type of street performing attracts thieves.’

To remove this confusion, the Mayor’s Office is running a #BackBusking campaign to establish a universal code of conduct. It should allow non-nuisance, unlicensed buskers to perform without recrimination. It’s tricky, though. When we asked Camden Council to explain their clampdown on unlicensed acts they said it was ‘light touch regulation’ due to ‘a rising number of complaints from residents […] particularly where amplified and percussion instruments are used’. The number of complaints? One hundred. In a year. If the councillors felt this sufficient to act against spontaneous street performance it seems unlikely they’ll get on board with a mayoral campaign which asks councils to ‘make sure [that] genuine buskers outside designated schemes don’t get moved on.’

‘It’d just be nice to change the image of a busker to someone that adds to the character of the city rather than being a nuisance,’ says Charlotte as we return to the South Bank, this time setting up at an unlicensed area by Gabriel’s Wharf. Apparently, the public agree. As Charlotte begins to coat chart hits with her honeyed voice, nearby office workers eating sandwiches on benches flash megawatt smiles at us.

IN THIS PHOTO: Ina Reni (an artist, whom I have interviewed, who has taken part in London's biggest busking competition)

Fifty daytripping kiddiwinks in luminous jackets are dragged over by an excited teacher. They clap along until Charlotte finishes singing and then run at her, wrapping their arms around her waist, squeaking ‘Another! Another!’ Pocket money fills the guitar case (we later find that we’ve made £45.26 in two hours) and the youngsters sit in a big crosslegged huddle in front of us, gazing up in adoration”.

It is that ‘public appreciation’ that seems to get to me. Not only does London prove to be a perfect place for busker hostility – people taking ‘offense’ at the music being played – but deters artists who want to bring the streets alive – and make some money for themselves. What troubles me is the fact some of these artists are genuinely trying to make a career and path for themselves. Even if they are there to provide happiness and music: should they be protected and safeguarded more than they are? The article above – I urge you to read it in full – is supported by testimony from many buskers in London. A recent piece in Metro added another dynamic to the argument:

“Buskers and street performers could be forced to buy a licence in order to legally perform in one London borough.

Councillors representing Kensington and Chelsea will discuss a proposed clampdown on buskers, mime artists and ‘living statues’ that would involve street performers needing a licence.

The plans state a new policy would ‘help eliminate people who are not providing a genuine performance’, the Evening Standard reported.

IN THIS PHOTO: Boris Johnson (Mayor of London at the time) and Newton Faulkner

It is not known how expensive the licence would be, but nearby Camden charges £17 a year, or £47 if they use amplifiers, drums or bagpipes.

In a report, councillor Tim Ahern said the proposal would reduce ‘nuisance and inconvenience to residents and businesses’.

He said: ‘It has proved difficult for enforcement officers to attribute anti-social behaviour to an individual busker. Officers would now like to license busking across the whole borough, initially for a trial period of 12 months.

‘The proposal is that all categories of busking performance, including those that are considered low impact, such as mime and living statues, will require a busking licence.

IN THIS PHOTO: Luca (a former winner of a London busking comepetition)

The borough would make about 100 permits available on a first-come, first-served basis.

Kensington and Chelsea is the first council in Britain to propose a ban on unlicensed street performers”.

This seems like a super-harsh taxation on people who are trying to create something pure – not bilk and swindle credulous tourists. I walk through London a lot and, away from the Tube stations, one does not encounter many musicians on the bigger streets. It used to be the case I would discover a lot of musicians performing through Oxford Street and Piccadilly. One finds more homeless than musicians these days: should we reverse a policy that seems to strangle a sense of artistic freedom?! It is a complicated brew but one we need to decode, review and amend. One can apply to busk on the Underground because, in my mind, we need to encourage and nurture those who risk performing to the bustling, unpredictable commuters of London. I am not down on London but feel cities like Manchester and Glasgow afford their buskers greater humanity and financial remuneration. I will, when passing through the London Underground, dip into my pocket when I hear a great musician play – it makes commuting more pleasant and appealing.

There are negatives when it comes to city busking. Recently, when travelling on the Jubilee Line; a trio of accordion-playing buskers leapt onto a Tube and ‘serenaded’ the patrons to a very loud and confined ditty. The pressure to compensate them – one could not easily look away or get private – was a pressure I surrendered to. There are rogue and rebellious artists that do offer sonic force and pressure. There is a minor element many associate with ‘London busking’. That is not the majority and is an unfair representation of what one can expect from the city. You can say the same of any major city where a variety of artists want to play. I am soured and off-put by the musicians one gets in smaller towns and local environs – often anyone can rock up and you might find, say, one half-decent busker in ten. To perform in the city; there are more stipulations and obstacles one has to navigate – to ensure there is an emphasis on quality and promise.

IN THIS PHOTO: Maeve Fitzpatrick (a contestant at this year's GIGS: Big Busk)

There are a few points from Roland’s guide to busking that offers tips to any wannabe busker:

#10. Loosen their wallets
“Most buskers ‘salt’ their cases before starting the set, slipping in a handful of their own money so punters recognise that tipping is welcome and know where to throw coins. As the set progresses, you want enough coins in the case to imply that you’re popular, but not so many that people conclude you don’t need more. Every few songs, take out some of the accumulated coins to stop a passing toerag stealing the loot. And that leads us onto…

#11. Grin and bear it
You’ll get drunks, nutters, thieves, pensioners informing you that you suck and hoodies gobbing in your case. Take it all on the chin. If you get heckled, laugh it off. If you get robbed, don’t chase them. Dealing with borderline psychopaths is an invaluable lesson for anyone hoping for a career in music.

#12. Use it as an apprenticeship
Busking can teach you everything you need to know about live performance. Spend a few weeks out there and you’ll work out what engages people and what leaves them cold, which songs spark a singalong and which ones get you punched. Learn your trade on the streets and who knows: maybe you’ll follow in the footsteps of ex-buskers like Ed Sheeran and Rodrigo Y Gabriela, and use the experience as a springboard to a gold-plated career. Today, the doorway of a defunct Woolworths. Tomorrow, the world…”

IN THIS PHOTO: Donna - Lois Andrea Music (a contestant at this year's GIGS: Big Busk)

We have all heard the story of famous musicians starting their lives as buskers. Ed Sheeran is a modern example of someone with those humble roots – transitioning, over the years, to the mainstream. That success did not occur overnight but, seeing him rise to prominence, gives heart and hope to buskers who, on an average day might seem deflated and lacklustre. Of course, one cannot say whether busking was instrumental in Sheeran’s success – and whether he was ‘spotted’ and discovered. There are few that have managed to rise from the streets to the mainstream but it is not impossible. Most musicians, when they busk, do not yearn for instant stardom: the fact they are able to get their music out there is the most important thing. I have reviewed and interviewed many musicians who busk; for different reasons. Some do it to showcase their music and get the first-hand reaction. It can be a terrific forum to see how songs are perceived by the British public. If one can navigate the ignorance and attitudes of the average citizen; you do get a core that recognises the hard craft and talent of musicians trying to make other’s lives better. Many busk to earn extra money or provide an outlet for amateur designs – not necessarily parlaying into a career in music or play at a professional level. Whatever the scale of ambition – and magnitude of their performance – we must provide better reception to buskers; those doing it legitimately and imbued with actual talent. There are many, as I have explained, who pollute the streets and crowd the eardrums – so many streets laden with similar-sounding buskers; none of whom warrant a pitch or any second thought. Bigger cities have greater quality control but, with such stringent guidelines being introduced, many are forced to pay to set up a pitch – often not able to turn any sort of profit over the course of a week.

We need protectionism and stricter codes in the RIGHT direction. Of course, nobody wants to see a cavalcade of semi-talented buskers singing at them but, at the same time, we do not want to purge the streets of genuine musicians who have something to say. I go to London and discover a range of wonderful sounds and artists. From the edgy and cramped conditions of the Underground to the open and swaying Oxford Street – it can be a great way of enlivening and enhancing a city. I fear, with venues under threat, many musicians will have to busk in order to get their music heard and honed. The danger of verbal and physical abuse; the criticism, banning and costs: all of this is muddying and diluting a culture that needs to survive and grow. I can understand the need to limit buskers in towns and smaller areas. Those who do not have a license should be punished by those who have the right to perform should not have to face taxation, repression and curfew.

IN THIS PHOTO: Ed Sheeran (busking in Brighton in 2010)

Music is an industry that should welcome people in and promote growth and expression. We cannot see our live venues close and struggle and push people off the streets. Maybe busking is not an easy way to success – it is part of a gruelling series of steps – but it needs to be protected and strengthened. I am split when it comes to town vs. city but, in terms of those instilled with promise and talent – they should not feel fearful and unable to follow a busking path. It is not a big ‘industry’ but, from the street-level player and artists looking for larger success, it is absolutely crucial. Whether we see buskers on the streets, cities or trains; I feel we all…

SHOULD be a lot more hospitable.

FEATURE: The Rise of the British Festival Scene: A Time for Celebration?

FEATURE: 

 The Rise of the British Festival Scene: A Time for Celebration?

________

OVER the weekend, I will be looking at a range of themes…

and sides of music. I will address Hip-Hop and the growing influence it has had – and how it has evolved the past three decades – and other cool things. That is for then but, for now, I am interested in the festival scene of Britain. In the news, the past few weeks, we have heard reports of bad weather afflicting various festivals. An article by The Independent investigated claims, by patrons of BoomTown festival, that people were fainting in hostile conditions – having to queue for hours and barely moving:

“The searches are very thorough this year which as previously warned is lengthening queuing time - speed this up by using amnesty bins.”

Later, just before 3pm, the festival tweeted: “GATES UPDATE: All gates are now open. Thank you for your continued patience.”

Cordelia Keston, a ticket-owner who was still queuing at the time of writing (5.20pm), spoke to us about her experiences live from the scene stating she had arrived two and a half hours previous and had only moved a maximum of “50 metres.”

Describing the queue's movement as “snail-pace,” Keston said: “We're trying to stay optimistic but there are no stewards around telling anyone anything. We feel a bit like sheep - there are no barriers, we're all in a huddle.”

Commenting on the reports of fainting, she told us that all she hadn't seen anybody pass out herself and had earlier seen someone handing out water which was then chaotically “thrown” into the crowd so everyone got some”.

We cannot do much about the British weather but it seems, in order to make festivals as secure as possible; we are compromising public safety to an extent. Of course, a couple of festivals are going to be afflicted with logistical and security issues. I think, in the case of BoomTown, there were some failings – which marred an, otherwise, great event. There are, as we know, so many other festivals occurring around the country that one can attend. It makes me wonder, when it comes to queuing and complaints, where the issue lies. Naturally, people want to come and see live music but are we being over-protective and under-resourced?

Describing the queue's movement as “snail-pace,” Keston said: “We're trying to stay optimistic but there are no stewards around telling anyone anything. We feel a bit like sheep - there are no barriers, we're all in a huddle.”

Commenting on the reports of fainting, she told us that all she hadn't seen anybody pass out herself and had earlier seen someone handing out water which was then chaotically “thrown” into the crowd so everyone got some”.

We cannot do much about the British weather but it seems, in order to make festivals as secure as possible; we are compromising public safety to an extent. Of course, a couple of festivals are going to be afflicted with logistical and security issues. I think, in the case of BoomTown, there were some failings – which marred an, otherwise, great event. There are, as we know, so many other festivals occurring around the country that one can attend. It makes me wonder, when it comes to queuing and complaints, where the issue lies. Naturally, people want to come and see live music but are we being over-protective and under-resourced?

IN THIS PHOTO: BoomTown festival (2016)

The threat of terrorism is real and ever-present but it seems like security has been stepped-up hugely in the past year. Maybe it is the increase in attendees that means festival staff are unable to cope with the huge numbers. We must protect everyone who attends a festival but I feel we are a bit too nervy and over-protective in the wake of recent attacks. One can never protect and safeguard every public gathering but there needs to be vigilance. I am not sure the exact details of BoomTown but let’s hope things have improved for the last day or two. Weather...we can do nothing about – it is one of those things that can affect a festival immeasurably. Rather the bemoan the grievances and problems; let’s acknowledge the great events happening around the country and the loyal music-lovers willing to risk rain and rancour.

IN THIS PHOTO: Eva Lazarus (who performed at last year's BoomTown)

Victorious Festival is one of the more-recent events that shows how passionate the young generation are (about them). That was set-up in 2012 by three friends – James Ralls, Ben Miles and Andy Marsh – and will go down from 25th to 27th of this month, in Southsea. There are some big names on the bill: it is recognised as one of the best family-friendly festivals in the country. V Festival is on 18th and is that hardy perennial (if that is the right gardening-related term?!) that brings in a, predominantly, younger crowd. Virgin V Festival 2017 and Creamfields are up soon and it means August is going to a hot one. After that, Reading and Leeds will bring in a very large and eager throng. Whatever your tastes and preferences: there is a festival that suits your tastes. With so many fears surrounding the dwindling of live venues around the nation; I wonder whether festivals are replacing smaller spaces – people able to afford a once-a-year jaunt rather than regular attendance. It is encouraging to see the number of festivals increase. People are getting out there and keen to soak up live music.

PHOTO CREDIT: Jenna Foxton

Those big festivals – Reading and Leeds; Glastonbury – pulls in more mainstream tastes; same can be said of Bestival and Victorious. Radio 1 has their Big Weekend and there are festivals representing the biggest radio stations in the country. Even though Secret Garden Party bade farewell this year: it is one of those boutique festivals that has had an enormous effect and inspired other organisers to change their ways and make a more varied and inspiring festival. I will not go into that side of things but am pleased there are so many smaller, unique festivals providing a worthy alternative to the mainstream. I wanted to update my feature regarding festivals – I wrote one a couple of months back – because, there and goods and bads to the rise of the festival scene. I can only imagine how hard it is for organisers making their lineups eclectic and original.

IN THIS PHOTO: V Festival

One looks at the festival posters and sees a lot of the same artists appearing. That is good for reasons – if you do not live near one festival, and want to see an artist, you can catch them elsewhere – and provided a steady yearly income. It also means, given the number of festivals, a lot of the best upcoming artists have a platform to perform on. The best thing about the festival explosion is the choice and health of our music economy. Genres and tastes are not being excluded: one can catch the best Dance, Metal and Alternative sounds without having to travel too far. The fact so many artists appear at many festivals does not necessarily put people off. Such is the richness and the sheer number of artists at each festival; the odd replication is inevitable. Many might look at lineups and say there is too much predictability and homogenisation. I will address that in the final part but, before then, the boom and fertility of new festivals. With every Secret Garden Party – and, because it is no more – there are two or three popping up.

IN THIS PHOTO: KT Tunstall (she plays Towersey Festival in Thame, on Friday, 25 August, 2017 (18:00)

The fact 'everyday Joes/Jos' can set up their own festivals means it is more achievable and ‘for the people’. There are those corporate festivals that continue to dominate but the emergence of promising new festivals means the balance might redress in the coming years. At any rate, it is positive for musicians having so many chances to perform – and the associated freedom, choice and availability for music-goers. Many might be dissuaded by the terrorist attacks and threats to our national security. That doesn’t seem to be the case this year: business is booming and people are unaffected (relatively) by those atrocities. One can go here to get a list of all the festivals happening in the coming months – the volume and variation is staggering! The fact more people are getting out there and desperate to get to festivals can only be a good thing. It means international artists – who might not have considering straying beyond big U.S. festivals in the past – are tempted here and it shows Britain’s music economy, this side of it, at least, is booming. The simple endorphin-rush and community aspect of festivals means the more we have (festivals); the greater the feel-good factor.

There are ‘bad’ factors that are more complex than one might imagine. One might ask how much money those big stars get. Does someone like Ed Sheeran or Foo Fighters make a bundle from their appearances at festivals like Glastonbury?! A recent article, explained:

“Radiohead, Katy Perry and Ed Sheeran are among those taking to the stage at this year’s event, but Eavis has said it won’t do much for their bank balances.

She told BBC 6 Music’s Matt Everitt that acts earn “less than 10%” of what they could make at other festivals.

"We're not in a situation where we're able to just give people enormous amounts of money," she explained.

"So we're really grateful for the bands that we get, because they're basically doing it for the love of it."

Founder Michael Eavis had, for context, previously revealed that £200,000 was once paid to Coldplay.

“Although it sounds a lot, they could have charged me far more,” he said at the time.

Oasis, for example, were believed to be paid upwards of £1m when they topped the bill at Reading and Leeds in 2000.

Oxfam, WaterAid and Greenpeace are among the charities who benefit from the money Glastonbury makes, rather than the musicians who take part”.

An earlier piece by The Telegraph shed more light on the complexities and rationale:

“Mintel’s senior leisure analyst, Michael Oliver, says this growth has been down to two key factors. Firstly, there has been an 8pc increase in the average ticket price for major festivals between 2013 and 2015. Secondly, and perhaps most crucially, is what he terms the “explosion” in the number of festivals since 2010.

As an example, the number of festivals listed on festival website eFestivals has jumped from 496 in 2007 to 1,070 last year. Steve Heap, chairman of the Event Industry Forum and general secretary of the Association of Festival Organisers, says the industry has been “swamped” with new festivals.

 “More and more of these events are cropping up, and more and more people are realising that, if they want to go to festivals, they can go to one relatively near to home,” he says. As well as the number, the nature of festivals has also changed dramatically, with greater focus on the “experience” of the event, rather than just headline acts. “More and more festivals don’t depend on the big act,” Heap says.

“They depend on putting on a great experience which has got a lot more to it than just the artist and the music.” So, if everything is going swimmingly, why are new festivals collapsing? Heap says, on the whole, there are always “a few” festivals that either close down, collapse or go bankrupt each year.

“Every time one closes down, two others start,” he says. Perhaps that is the problem. There is a concern that the market has become oversaturated and will plateau as a growing number of people try their hand at running a festival, seeing it as an easy ticket to riches.

That pot of gold very rarely materialises, though, and Heap says only a few of the smaller festivals are financially lucrative. “It is harder now than ever to make a profit,” he says. “Apart from the big boys, the festival scene is not making loads of profit. “The new ones coming up have a crack at it and think themselves very lucky if they just get by. Some of them, especially the ones who think they will make a quick buck, usually don’t and quite often just collapse.”

IN THIS PHOTO: Tiesto

One of the biggest hurdles to profit is the considerable cost of organisational factors such as the staging, lighting, speakers and lavatories, which can very easily – and very quickly – spiral out of control. The second major problem is artist fees. As is well documented, a decline in record sales has led musicians increasingly to view live performances as their primary source of income. Because of that, the artists are charging higher fees than ever before.

Without the musicians, it can be incredibly hard to sell tickets, but with the artists, the festival’s balance sheet can become strained. Neil Warnock, head of worldwide music at United Talent Agency, represents artists such as Glastonbury headliners Muse, Motörhead and Dolly Parton.

He says the fees paid to artists at festivals have become “far more attractive” in recent years. “We have almost gone back now, full circle, to artists earning their money on the road, like they did in the ’60s,” he said”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Foo Fighters (who, like the other headliners at Glastonbury, were not paid as much as one might imagine)

I guess there is an intent desire and passion in the festival stars. They are not in it for the loot and, within reasonable boundaries, are prepared to take a pay-cut. The warnings can’t be that bad but one imagines the payment for smaller acts is a lot more modest. I suppose, if one wants to put themselves on the map, they have to tour and get out there – often barely making a profit from a year of touring. Maybe that desire and push to get exposure is forcing many to, not only perform at as many festivals as possible, but be prepared to play for less money than usual. There are those security concerns but, I guess, in a time where terrorism is a very real threat; can we undermine and under-source security personnel? The recent fiascos at Boomtown and other festivals have been as much dictated by the weather as human error. It is inevitable there will be some mishaps but there are definite creases to be ironed-out. There have been fights and complaints, yes, but that was the results of a ‘perfect’ storm: the delays, heat and invariable stresses that built up. It is a rare exception but one we need to learn from. We can see, from the creation of new festivals and masses flocking to them, the British music scene – in this dimension and corner – is burgeoning and healthy. My hope is this proliferation and blossoming lets the government and decision-makers know – who affect the funding and survival of small venues – realise there is an enormous desire for…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Secret Garden Party (2015)

INCREDIBLE live music.

FEATURE: Glen Campbell: Heavy on Our Minds

FEATURE:

 

Glen Campbell: 

 Heavy on Our Minds

________

I could not pass by the sad news that many woke up to today.

Every time a musician dies it is a tragic event but there is something extra-sad and profound when it comes to the loss of Glen Campbell. I shall split this (short) feature into a biography-Wikipedia-heavy bit and some personal input – before offering a playlist of Campbell’s best-loved songs. Listening to the radio today; one gets a real sense of the impact and effect Glen Campbell has had on the world of music. Let’s interject the Wikipedia, distilled biography of Campbell, first:

“Glen Travis Campbell (April 22, 1936 – August 8, 2017) was an American singer, songwriter, musician, television host, and actor. He is best known for a series of hits in the 1960s and 1970s, and for hosting a music and comedy variety show called The Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour on CBS television, from January 1969 through June 1972.[2]

During his 50 years in show business, Campbell released more than 70 albums. He sold 45 million records and accumulated 12 RIAA gold albums, four platinum albums, and one double-platinum album. He placed a total of 80 different songs on either the Billboard Country Chart, Billboard Hot 100, or Adult Contemporary Chart, of which 29 made the top 10 and of which nine reached number one on at least one of those charts. Campbell's hits include his recordings of John Hartford's "Gentle on My Mind"; Jimmy Webb's "By the Time I Get to Phoenix", "Wichita Lineman", and "Galveston"; Larry Weiss's "Rhinestone Cowboy"; and Allen Toussaint's "Southern Nights".

Campbell made history in 1967 by winning four Grammys in the country and pop categories. For "Gentle on My Mind", he received two awards incountry and western, "By the Time I Get to Phoenix" did the same in pop. Three of his early hits later won Grammy Hall of Fame Awards (2000, 2004, 2008), while Campbell himself won the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award in 2012. He owns trophies for Male Vocalist of the Year from both the Country Music Association (CMA) and the Academy of Country Music (ACM), and took the CMA's top award as 1968 Entertainer of the Year. Campbell appeared as a supporting role in the film True Grit (1969), which earned him a Golden Globe nomination for Most Promising Newcomer. Campbell also sang the title song, which was nominated for an Academy Award”.

For a true reflection of Glen Campbell’s legacy; one must go back to the start and where it all began. Campbell moved to Los Angeles in 1960 – the hope was to ply his trade as a session musician. That seems extraordinary considering the legacy and impact he would make on music but, like many musicians, that was the way their career began. I hear tales when it comes to the work-rate and determination of Campbell. The number of sessions he would be involved with of a year would blow the mind – a voracious, passionate and curious musician keen to lay down his immense guitar-playing skills to some of the day’s best artists. Whilst working for a publishing company, American Music (1961), he started what was to become the world-famous Wrecking Crew collective – Campbell would work with everyone from Dean Martin, Nat King Cole; Elvis Presley, Frank Sinatra and the Monkees.

Crest Records, seeing the talent and breadth of Campbell, signed him up: he would release Turn Around, Look at Me soon after – it was a minor success and didn’t make much of a chart impact. That said, many contemporaries realised how special and unique Campbell was. In a day where many Rock and mainstream artists were unable to play the guitar – let alone across so many genres – here was a singular talent who could put them all to shame. That skill and incredible talent meant, by 1962, Campbell was signed to Capitol Records. Television appearances followed and, before you know it, people were reacting and falling for the charming Campbell – who started to tour with Beach Boys when Brian Wilson was going through personal troubles. There was a lot of experimentation but, by 1965, things were really starting to come together.

It was the 1965 hit, Universal Soldier (a cover of Buffy Sainte-Marie’s track), that gained him that shot of positive reaction – singling him out to many critics and big-wigs. Even if Campbell was quite outspoken regarding his views of drafting soldiers and pacifism – those who advocated burning draft cards, he felt, should be punished – it was a time that, to many, should have signalled success and future achievement. It was a rough period where follow-up singles were not performing as well as one had hoped. 1967 was a year where Campbell gained success with Gentle on My Mind (written by John Hartford) and By the Time I Get to Phoenix. It was 1968 that brought us Wichita Lineman and, winning four Grammy Awards – for the performances of Gentle on My Mind and By the Time I Get to Phoenix – it was the recognition and acclaim Campbell had been striving for.

That late-1960s period was a fruitful time. Most of his better-known songs were written by Jimmy Webb – he wrote Wichita Lineman and Galveston (among others). The success and impressive productivity continued into the 1970s. Having accrued a host of session-work names; his T.V. show, The Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour, put major names together. Neil Diamond, Johnny Cash and Bread were among the huge artists who Campbell introduced in the studio. That show ran until 1972 but the T.V./film exposure did not end there. A made-for-television movie, Strange Homecoming (1974) - and a series of hosting gigs - kept the American legend in the public consciousness. The mid-1970s was the second really productive and successful period when songs such as Rhinestone Cowboy and Southern Nights were released. The former became Campbell’s biggest-selling song and a track that many associate with Campbell and his legacy.

That is a biography and a brief snapshot of a legend whose incredible musical talents and voice captivated the world. An Alzheimer’s diagnosis in 2011 could have deterred the ailing Campbell but he was still prolific and active right up until his death. His final album, Adiós, was released in June - and gained a warm and positive critical reception. It is sad to hear of Campbell’s passing but one should be thankful a unique and astonishing musician made his impact on the world. One need only hear a vocal performance like Wichita Lineman to realise the effect and inspiration he has had on modern artists. Whether consciously or not; so many young musicians – not only Country stars – have taken from Campbell’s music.

Whether an epic and attiring vocal or that wide-ranging and astonishing guitar-playing. Many associate Campbell with Country but the journeyman musician grew from meagre beginnings to become one of the world’s biggest names – performing alongside immense artists and playing in so many different styles. He was a performer who could adapt his voice and play any genre and song. His biggest hits are those Country anthems but one need only look through Campbell’s immense array of studio/live albums to know it is impossible to pin him down. The fact he reached eighty-one is a great innings but one would have liked Campbell to remain with us a lot longer. I have been listening to a lot of interviews he conducted and every time, he came across as compelling, rooted and entertaining. The anecdotes, explanations and insights gave you a real taste of the man. Such a warm and kind soul and, whether you agree with some of his politics and views, what shone through was the phenomenal, enduring music – that which continue to inspire musicians for decades to come. It is a sad day for reflection but, also, for celebration: a brilliant artist who made such an impact through his long and legendary career. As we remember Glen Campbell – and his classic hits – we can be safe in the knowledge there will never be anyone…

IN THIS PHOTO: Campbell with his wife, Kim Woollen

LIKE him again.

__________

FEATURE: #NoFilter: The Music Photographers Shooting High

FEATURE:

 

#NoFilter:

 PHOTO CREDIT: Annie Leibovitz/IN THIS PHOTO: Keith Richards

 The Music Photographers Shooting High

________

MY previous feature concerned music labels and those that are…

PHOTO CREDIT: Sacha Lecca

supporting and promoting the best talent around the world. I collated the finest labels and why, in my opinion, they were worth a serious look. I will, at some stage, concentrate on producers and an area of music that is relatively undersubscribed. We get into the mindset that all the glamour and excitement comes with a career as a musician. Many overlook the importance of those behind microphones and mixing desks – and those who photograph and film concerts/musicians. I know many music photographers and all have their own reasons for taking it up. It is the excitement of capturing that single moment. Defining a gig or encapsulating a particular look can stay in the memory for years. I included a famous photo (up-top) by Annie Leibovitz as she, in many people’s views, she is the finest music photographer who has ever lived. She has snapped iconic images of everyone from Iggy Pop, Paul McCartney and The White Stripes – photographing Hollywood stars like Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Lawrence.

PHOTO CREDIT: Christie Goodwin/IN THIS PHOTO: Katy Perry

There is a great article that provides a realistic and encouraging narrative of how to become a photographer – and the costs and realities involved. It does not take a lot of money to get started but, once that passion and ambition grows; the equipment needed to get those top-quality shots will climb. I can understand the desire photographers have and why they hanker to shoot that ‘perfect’ image. In a lot of ways; images of gigs/musicians can be more iconic and enduring than the music itself. A fantastic self-portrait or composition catches the eye and gets in the mind: a wonderful mid-gig photo is that visual documentation of a unique moment. The genuinely inventive and quality photographer are harder to get hold of than you’d imagine. I review so many great artists but they are let down by a surfeit of good-quality images. Hiring a photographer can be expensive but, if you get a selection of great shots on your social media, that makes a more attractive and appealing proposition.

IN THIS PHOTO: Ashley Osborn

Ashley Osborn, who features in this rundown, explained why she took up photography and the highlights she has discovered:

“I was shooting at least three shows a week in Chicago, editing each monthly issue, and working full-time at Starbucks. It was so much work but it was worth it. Things started to take off. I met a musician named Craig Owens in 2012 and I started shooting his band, Chiodos. Early in 2013, my friend and musician GOLDHOUSE asked me to join him for a weekend tour to take photos and document it. Then Chiodos asked if I could come out on Warped Tour that summer for a few days. My manager at Starbucks rearranged the books so I could take time off, still keep my job, and get paid. I don't know if that was [kosher], but I really appreciated it. In the fall of 2013, I went on my first tour with PVRIS. I was friends with Lynn Gunn, the band's vocalist/guitarist, and I'm pretty sure I cried when she asked me to come on tour. It was just them and me, and we were kind of winging it. I took photos of the tour, burned merch CDs on my laptop, and sold them at the shows. It was probably the hardest and most exciting month of my entire life, but it really solidified that I wanted to do this”.

To celebrate the pioneering and hard-working photographers; a list of the finest music snapper from around the world – with one of their typical shots, Instagram (and official/social media) page – and where one might find them snapping away…

_________

Rukes 

IN THIS PHOTO: Ellie Goulding

Location: Worldwide

Official: http://www.rukes.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rukes/?hl=en

Jonathan Mannion

IN THIS PHOTO: Drake

Location: New York, U.S.A.

Official: https://www.jonathanmannion.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jonathanmannion/?hl=en

Ashley Osborn

IN THIS PHOTO: Of Mice & Men

Location: Chicago, U.S.A.

Official: http://www.ashleyosbornphotography.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ashleyosborn/?hl=en

Brook Bobbins

 IN THIS PHOTO: Frank Ocean

Location: New York, U.S.A.

Official: https://www.flickr.com/photos/crookrobbins/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/crookrobbins/?hl=en

Sacha Lecca

 IN THIS PHOTO: Mac DeMarco

Location: New York, U.S.A.

Tumblr: http://sachalecca.tumblr.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sachalecca/?hl=en

Nabil

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kendrick Lamar

Location: Los Angeles, U.S.A.

Official: http://nabil.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nabildo/?hl=en

Shay Rowan

Location: Manchester, U.K.

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/25880052@N08/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/shayster57

Christine Goodwin

 IN THIS PHOTO: Taylor Swift

Location: London, U.K.

Official: https://www.christiegoodwin.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/christiegoodwin/

Elie/'Visionelie'

IN THIS PHOTO: The Weeknd

Location: Toronto, Canada

Twitter: https://twitter.com/visionelie?lang=en

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/elie/

Hannah Sider

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kitty Cash

Location: New York, U.S.A.

Official: http://hannahsider.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hannahsider/?hl=en

Perri Cassie

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Nash

Location: Melbourne, Australia

Official: http://ibravedtreacherousstreets.tumblr.com/

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/evil-twin/

Lindsey Best

 IN THIS PHOTO: Paramore

Location: Los Angles, U.S.A.

Official: http://www.lindseybest.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lindzbest/

Thomas Falcone

 IN THIS PHOTO: All Time Low

Location: U.S.A.

Official: http://www.thomasfalcone.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thomasfalcone/?hl=en

The Manc Photographer

 Location: Manchester, U.K.

Official: http://www.themancphotographer.co.uk/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/matteachus/

Thomas Brooker

 IN THIS PHOTO: Brutus (captured at Green Door Store)

Location: Brighton, U.K.

Official: http://tlbrooker.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thomaslislebrooker/?hl=en

Lizzy Davis

 IN THIS PHOTO: Carla Coates of Butcher Babes

Location: Florida, U.S.A.

Official: https://lizzydavisphotography.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/llzzies/

Pat McGuire

IN THIS PHOTO: Jamie Reilly from The Blue Lenas

Location: Glasgow, U.K.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pmg.photog/

Ami Barwell 

Location: U.K.

Official: http://www.musicphotographer.co.uk/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amibarwell/

Ryan Johnston

IN THIS PHOTO: You Me at Six

Location: Glasgow, U.K.

Official: https://www.ryanjohnston.co/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ryanjohnstonco/

Dean Chalkley

 IN THIS PHOTO: Rag 'n' Bone Man

Location: London, U.K.

Official: http://www.deanchalkley.com/                 

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/deanchalkley_/

Trust a Fox

 Location: Manchester, U.K.

Official: https://www.trustafoxphotography.com/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/TrustFox

Casey McPerry

 IN THIS PHOTO: Machine Gun Kelly

Location: Worldwide

Official: http://caseymcperry.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/caseymcperry/?hl=en

Alexandra Gavillet

 IN THIS PHOTO: The Range

Location: Chicago, U.S.A.

Official: http://www.alexandragavillet.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/alexandra_gavillet/

 Brett Schewitz

 IN THIS PHOTO: Nic Cester from Jet

Location: Melbourne, Australia

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BrettSPhotography/

Instagram: https://instagram.com/http://www.instagram.com/schweppsrocka

FEATURE: Labelled with Love: A Selection of Some of the Most Influential Record Labels in Music

FEATURE:

 

Labelled with Love: 

IN THIS PHOTO: FKA Twigs of Young Turks 

A Selection of Some of the Most Influential Labels in Music

________

THIS is a rare excursion into the territory of record labels…

and a chance to recognise some of the most inspiration, important and upcoming names we should look out for. Some are well-known whereas others are smaller and working in the underground. The record label often gets overlooked in favour of the artist: one cannot underestimate the importance and significance of the label behind the talent. They, not only provide that guidance and energy - but offer knowledge and an immense amount of time.

Because of this; a rundown of the well-known and lesser-heard labels that warrant more time, acclaim and listening…

__________

Mad Decent

IN THIS PHOTO: Poppy

Made Decent, formed in 2006, are, according to Pigeons and Planes...  

"...If you aren't yet familiar with the record label Mad Decent, chances are that you've at least heard of its founder Thomas Wesley Pentz aka Diplo. Established in 2006, the imprint originally worked to promote Brazillian Baile Funk and Angolan Kudro. The label's mantra revolves around bringing new genres and cultures to the forefront of an ever diversifying music community".

Website: http://www.maddecent.com/

XL Recordings

IN THIS PHOTO: Smerz

Again, when looking at the 1989-formed XL Recordings; Pigeons and Planes encapsulate the merit and essence of the mega label:

“Despite releasing an average of merely six albums per year, XL Recordings has become a widely recognized and respected force in the indiedendent label space. XL has even superceded the concept of indie in some ways as they work with some of today's largest acts. Founded by Richard Russel, Tim Palmer, and Nick Halkes, the Beggars Banquet offshoot was originally launched to release rave and dance music. In the early '90s the label focused mostly on dance-oriented releases ranging from Belgian Techno and Breakbeat to Hardcore and Drum & Bass. Their willingness to work with more eccentric, experimental artists is evidenced by their longstanding relationship with The Prodigy”.

Website: http://www.xlrecordings.com/

Fat Possum Records

IN THIS PHOTO: Kadhja Bonet

It is the same site that has led me to this incredible label – that formed back in 1992:

“Founded back in the early '90s by Matthew Johnson and Peter Redvers-Lee simply as a way to preserve some of the blues players in their corner of North Mississippi, Fat Possum has consistently released music with meaningful cultural implications. Early on the label stayed fairly true to their blues roots and relied heavily on New York Times critic Robert Palmer when it came to picking acts to sign. But with the changing industry and expanding tastes, Fat Possum have branched out from their early roots and now have a large roster that includes bands like Wavves, Tennis, Youth Lagoon, and Spiritualized”.

Website: http://www.fatpossum.com/

>

Paper Garden Records

IN THIS PHOTO: Color Collage

The relatively new label (formed in 2005) are looking after some tremendous acts right now. It is the penultimate name from the Pigeons and Planes guidance and, looking at their website, a label that has a huge ear for quality:

“Bryan Vaughan founded Paper Garden Records in 2005 as part of an entrepreneurial program at Belmont University in Nashville, but it wasn't until he moved to New York City and became business partners with Heidi Greenwood that the label really flowered into full fruition. Still functioning on a very DIY scale, the pair work out of their apartment, and yet manage to represent some of the best independent and underground music being created. Whether it be releasing records through their small, independent label, or helping represent bands through the Lovely Hearts Club PR blast branch of the LLC”.

Website: http://www.papergardenrecords.com/

Neon Gold

This label is responsible for some of the biggest Pop artists/songs in recent years and, as you can see from their site, are constantly supporting ripe and promising talent:

“In terms of indie pop pedigree, Neon Gold is unbeatable. Their roster is a place to go if you want to see where indie's biggest superstars got their start, and a great bet if you're planning on catching an act early on in what will become a huge career. The boutique label was first founded by Derek Davies and Lizzy Paplinger to release Passion Pit's "Sleepyhead" single. Five years later, the band is headlining Madison Square Garden. A savant-level ability to predict what music is destined to break big on the mainstream is no fluke for these guys; Ellie Goulding, Gotye, Marina & The Diamonds and Penguin Prison are all NG alums, too”.

Website: http://neon.gold/

Whities

 IN THIS PHOTO: The cover for Whities 011 by Lanark Artefax

The next four names I have sourced from FACT, who, all the time, have their finger on the pulse and know their stuff! The first label is one I am really curious about:

“London’s barely hatched Whities label colored even further outside the lines in its third year in action, bringing us, on one hand, one of the year’s biggest dancefloor 12″s in Avalon Emerson’s evocative, thundering ‘The Frontier’, and, on the other, one of the strangest pop mutations we’ve ever encountered in Reckonwrong’s Devo-meets-Morrissey bedroom-disco curio ‘The Passions of Pez’. Add to that another mind-melting spookfest from bass engineer Minor Science and Lanark Artefax’s breakbeat daydream on ‘Touch Absence’ and you’ve got the makings of a classic year for Nic Tasker’s operation”.

Website: https://www.residentadvisor.net/record-label.aspx?id=10855

Timedance

  “It’s easier than ever to start a label thanks to the power of the internet, but taking the old-fashioned approach and building something local is all too rare these days. It’s one of the reasons why Batu’s Timedance label stood out in 2016; instead of trawling SoundCloud for unsigned club producers and seeing what sticks, he’s built a community around the music of his Bristol contemporaries and formed something that feels very much like a family of like-minded artists”.

Website:  https://timedance.bandcamp.com/

Orange Milk

“Orange Milk’s experimental music carnival was in full swing this year, dropping releases that were as garishly entertaining as they were artistically challenging. The label hit us with indescribable weirdness like DJWWWW’s Arigato, Foodman’s Ez Minzoku and Death’s Dynamic Shroud’s Classroom Sexxxtape, all utter headscratchers that might turn you off if they weren’t so damn fun to listen to.

OM delivered on all fronts: Diamond Soul’s chaotic footwork, Euglossine’s psychedelic easy-listening and gorgeous plunderphonics from M Sage. Even their reissues were excellent, including Machine Girl’s endorphin overload Gemini and Goop, a reminder that Orange Milk co-founder Seth Graham is the label’s secret weapon”.

Website: http://www.orangemilkrecords.com/store/c1/Featured_Products.html

Swing Ting

IN THIS PHOTO: Murder He Wrote

“Manchester has not-so-quietly made a play for the UK’s greatest party city in the last couple of years, and Swing Ting have been right at the heart of the action. Samrai and Platt’s party-turned-label shifted into fifth gear in 2016, releasing a string of solid gold 12″s and EPs pushing their melting pot of faves – R&B, grime, jungle – into a mutant bashment direction, with spectacular results.

Fox’s Musik EP saw the Manchester-via-Kingston MC body a killer set of productions from Famous Eno, Florentino, Murlo, Brackles and the label bosses, while Florentino’s own ‘Bloodline’/’Sientelo’ perfected his recipe for quirky reggaeton confections. Samrai and Platt crowned the slinky ‘Tease Me’ with a sexed-up vocal from Kingston MC Kemikal, while Jamaican duo Equiknoxx graced the label with pa-rappa-pa-rapping ‘Bubble’, one of the greatest dancehall moments in a year stuffed full of them. Add to that Alexx A-Game’s G-funk-dembow hybrid and Famous Eno’s mile-high posse cut ‘Gangsters’, and there’s simply no competition. The Swing Ting sound was all we wanted to hear this year”.

Website: http://swingting.com/

Wichita

IN THIS PHOTO: Globelamp

The label formed in 2000 and has, since its inception, brought us the likes of Bloc Party and The Cribs. Mothers and Girlpool are currently on their books and it is clear Wichita is one of the most important and ever-evolving labels in the world.

Website: https://www.wichita-recordings.com/

4AD

IN THIS PHOTO: Purity Ring

Camera Obscura and Pixies have previously been on the 4AD label. Now, they support Bon Iver, Daughter and Lo-Fang – so many more incredible artists that take the breath away. It is one of the most varied labels and, because of that, one many look to when seeking out the best new talent...

Website: http://www.4ad.com/

Dirty Hit

IN THIS PHOTO: Wolf Alice (2015)/PHOTO CREDIT: Jo Hale/Redferns via Getty Images

They are one of the newer labels – formed in 2009 – and have seen Wolf Alice, The 1975 and Marika Hackman come through their doors. Despite the fact they are young and growing: they have a flair for those original and bold artists that differ from that is out there in the mainstream. Expect their stable to keep growing in years to come...

Website: http://dirtyhit.co.uk/

PMR

PMR signed the likes of Jessie Ware when they launched in 2011. Ware and Disclosure were on their books and soon rose to become two of the biggest stars in the U.K. Two Inch Punch and Javeon soon came to PMR and added to their healthy stock - which includes everyone from GIRLI and Dornik.

Website: http://www.pmrrecords.com/

Young Turks

IN THIS PHOTO: Chairlift

As part of an imprint for XL Recordings in 2006; Young Turks can boast names like FKA Twigs, Sampha and Waaves to their increasing and genre-busting crew. They are, like all great labels, diversifying and building their clientele. At the moment, they can proudly showcase some of the most impressive and forward-thinking acts in the world.

Website: https://theyoungturks.co.uk/

Turnstile

IN THIS PHOTO: Cate Le Bon

Cate Le Bon, Gruff Rhys and Perfume Genius show what an eclectic, fascinating and quality-striving ethos the label has. It is a fantastic outfit that continues to seek-out the very finest from music – so far, they have done a pretty good job of bringing us the very best and brightest!

Website: http://www.turnstilemusic.net/

Glassnote

IN THIS PHOTO: Flo Morrissey/PHOTO CREDIT: Roo Lewis

The U.S. label has helped launch the careers of Chvrches, Daughter and Mumford and Sons. Childish Gambino, Flo Morrissey and James Hersey make it one of the most eclectic and solid labels in music – one that continues to back and nurture incredible musicians.

Website: http://glassnotemusic.com/

Bella Union

IN THIS PHOTO: BNQT

Started by former Cocteau Twins member Simon Raymonde; they brought us Fleet Foxes but, alongside them, The Trouble with Temptation and Manchester’s MONEY are on their line-up. A stellar and huge label that continues to exert influence and incredible artistry – so many years after their inception and starting-blocks!

Website: http://bellaunion.com/

Domino

IN THIS PHOTO: Anna Calvi

You don’t need me to tell you they have Arctic Monkeys and Franz Ferdinand as examples of the type of music they promise. More recently; they have Alex G (Sandy) and Georgia and Matthew E. White reoresenting them - ensuring the future for Domino Records is very bright and rosy.

Website: http://www.dominorecordco.com/

FEATURE: “If You Had to Save One Disc from the Waves…”

FEATURE:

“If You Had to Save One Disc from the Waves…”

________

IT feels like I am attending a Radio Addicts Anonymous meeting…

IN THIS PHOTO: Current Desert Island Discs host, Kirsty Young

when I pull up a stool and nervously averted people’s gazes. It is with tame acquiescence I confess this: I, group, am a Desert Island Discs obsessive. Maybe that is not such an embarrassing confession but, such is the gravity and influence the series has had on my life, I find myself repeating episodes in my head. If the moment Tom Hanks freezes after a question – when he was on the show on 8th May, 2016 – and chokes back the tears does not get to you - then you might be technically dead. Maybe it is the strangely likeable turn from Ed Sheeran or the unexpected appearance from Bruce Springsteen. I love Caitlin Moran and Sue Perkins’ incredible turns; Jimmy Carr’s unexpectedly fine musical choices – the man chose Beyoncé and Kanye West among his eight discs! – or whatever it happens to be…one cannot deny the addictiveness and compelling voices one gets from Desert Island Discs! I am, rather annoyingly, only now initiating myself to the endless pleasures of the show. The fact Desert Island Discs has reached seventy-five – and still looks fantastic in a bikini.. – means I have over seven decades of castaways to investigate! No worries because it is a task I am willing to undertake. I think, among other things, it is Kirsty Young’s incumbency that has really hooked me in.

Maybe it is her East Kilbride pronunciations – those ‘hard Hs’ are enough to make the soul sing (je suis amoureux!) – or the fact she can relax a guest to the point of seduction is entrancing – one is convinced she could get a mass murderer to confess their sins, rehabilitate and find God within the space of a conversation. It is a Sunday fixture I ensure I am committed to. The reason for penning this piece – aside from indulging my own radio habits – is to raise a genuinely interesting question! By the way: if you have not listened to Desert Island Discs, I urge you to get your earlobes around it. Anyway; let's return to my point, shall we? Every week, Young guides her guests through a series of question-and-music intervals where she would ask them about an aspect of their life – before they/she introduces a song of their choosing. Each castaway – so-called for obvious reasons – gets to select eight discs (one imagines classic 33/45 R.P.M. formats) that they are allowed to take to the island – where it is, nobody knows; each guest goes to a different one. They are, in addition, allowed a book (they get a copy of the Bible and The Complete Works of Shakespeare) but get to select a luxury, too. I recently posted a similar piece casting myself, in ludicrous long-shot probability, in the mantle of a castaway on the show. My luxury was/would have been a photo of my family but, thinking I could well picture them – rendering a single shot rather meaningless – I changed my answer to a water purification kit and penicillin.

It seems rather un-luxurious but, if one is stranded on an unknown island, the chances are there is going to be an extinction of clean water – thus, they would painfully perish within days were they not equipped to purify the abundance of salt water around them. It would sustain my long enough in order to acclimatise to the unique and hospitable ecosystem. I would forage for food – being a pescatarian means it would be fish-rich – and, one assumes, be susceptible to infections, illness and various-assorted maladies. If I were allowed a ‘bundle’ option of the two: that would seem like the best luxury ever – the chance to extend my life is, in all honesty, far more material and pragmatic than a trampoline or a tin of deodorant (neither, to the best of my knowledge, have been selected as luxuries). I digress but, working up to my eventual point, I would select a music-related book – possibly a thorough biography of The Beatles (with photos and interviews) – that would keep me company and suffice my voracious appetite for all things sonic. Every time I immerse myself in an episode of Desert Island Discs; I follow, with great interest, the musical choices of each castaway. There is a fascinating psychology hearing one’s musical predilections and the reasons attached to each.

IN THIS PHOTO: Tom Hanks and Kirsty Young

As Tom Hanks explained when he was on the show: each track should represent a special moment or connect you to a meaningful time in your life. That is what the finest music does to me so, tasked with the option of salvaging only one record from the cruelty of the waves, chills my balls to the core. Why one would have eight discs and no turntable – an old-school Walkman, perchance? – is beyond me but one dare not quibble with the ecumenical and divine purity of Desert Island Discs. I would evoke such glee and fulfilment from curating an octet of songs: the reality of reducing that impressive eight-piece to a single survivor is heartbreaking. One might as well ask me to decide which of my vital organs I want to donate to a local cannibal. That is, you’ll forgive, post hoc ergo propter hoc, but it contextualises a similar egregiousness (I would get rid of my heart because I feel I could deliver a James Bond-worthy quip before I saw it stop beating). The fact I am a journalist means, constricting a library-full of musical desires into a briefcase-sized carry-on of eight, is a tricky predicament.

I think Caitlin Moran – a proper journalist (unlike myself) – felt, with mock-horror, the same kind of stress when faced with that conundrum. I would have to choose, for sure, one track from The Beatles, Kate Bush and Jeff Buckley: my Holy Trinity of musical idols. I would, gun to head, select Kate Bush’s Strange Phenomena; Jeff Buckley’s rendition of The Way Young Lovers Do (from his Live at Sin-é album); I would then....oooh…say, Got to Get You Into My Life from The Beatles. That penultimate cut from Revolver would not only be a perfect way to kick-start a day on an island – it is a fantastic song that is able to elicit joy and redemption in harshest of circumstances. Four and five would have to be The White Stripes’ Truth Doesn’t Make a Noise (from their sophomore album, De Stijl) and, um, Tears for Fears’ Everybody Wants to Rule the World. The latter, because it is, literally my first memory of life – and, therefore, my first experience of music. The former is from one of my favourite acts and a song that would evoke fond memories - and a better time. I would need another female voice so I would have to Björk. In regards her music, I would pick Big Time Sensuality (from Debut). My last two choices would be a little unexpected...

Well...T. Rex were a huge influence during my childhood so I would have to go with Metal Guru (as it is one of their earliest songs I remember) and, believe it or not, Benny Goodman’s Sing, Sing, Sing (With a Swing). That song is full of life and energy so, it would be a good contrast to the more downbeat and contemplative records. It would be incongruence to spend too little time limiting your musical existence to eight discs - but I reserve the right to interchange and alter my selections at any point. I am pretty certain about The Beatles, Kate Bush and Jeff Buckley – Tears for Fears would need to be in the rundown. At the very end of each edition (of Desert Island Discs), Kirsty Young always poses that question: “If you had to save one disc from the waves…which would it be?” She delivers it with such chocolate-rich warmth, but it is like a stab to the heart. Forget what would happen if I ever had to answer that question on the show: if I were actually on a desert island and faced with that reality…I don’t think I would be in a position to make a quick decision. This feature is less about promoting Desert Island Discs – it does not need me to do that – but get people to think about why a song is so special and why a particular track would defeat all others.

Are music and unequivocal certainty likely bedfellows? Can one limit their passion to a single record and how easy is it to narrow your entire music knowledge to that solo choice?! Does one, if battling the water, select that disc based on its emotional connection or a particular relevance. For me, when going for that one record; I would have to go for the one that manages to connect my downs and highs in life: my whole education of music and all the emotions that interweave and socialise with those disparate things. That seems like an impossible expectation but, when you are provoked, the mind and soul can make that decision. Each person will have their own reasons for selecting a single record but, for me, it would have to have that importance and relevance. I could not make the decision idly but, pressed with very little time, I would instinctively lunge for that record that would, essentially, be my only company on the island.

Forbidden from bringing anything sentient with me: that one record would be the only other voice I would ever hear. Many castaways, when prompted, chose a female voice for their choice – a warmth and maternal spirit seems more nourishing and welcoming than a male voice – whilst others attached romantic significance to their choice. For me, being a blank canvas when it comes to grand relationships. My criteria is based on my childhood, growth and realisations. None of my eight selections is, I think, younger than fifteen-years-old. Actually, since typing this, I have had to substitute one record (not sure which) with a Talking Heads song, I Zimbra (from Fear of Music) - or maybe I should just leave it be. I don’t think I could survive without the band so, you see what I mean?! Rationalising eight records above everything else in music is difficult: how does one choose a sole survivor?! One of the great things about Desert Island Discs is how each guest explains their attachment to a particular track. Understanding the importance and story behind each is fascinating to witness. Every definition is unique and shows how broad, meaningful and universal music is. I take music for granted in this day and age. Given the access one has to nearly every track every recorded – how willing would we be to sacrifice luxury and the expansive of musical exploration? One can, at the click of a mouse, access a playlist of of-the-moment songs or Jazz classics. We can hear anything we want and, of a day, be privy to an incredible array of genres, sound and suggestions.

I shall wrap this up – as the darkness is coming in and I feel like I need to hunker-down on the island – so, before the waves come in (and I, for some reason, would not patrol my records like a rabid German police dog), I will have to clear my thoughts and allow rationale and logic dictate my near-impossible choice. I wanted people to think about their musical education and passions; why they bond to certain songs and what, for them, defines a perfect song. Whether the anthem for a celebratory moment or the song you heard whilst falling for your lover – there are so many scenarios and configurations that mean a certain song takes prominence above all else. It is really intriguing to find out each person’s story – and why they are attached so fondly to that song. Given the negative peripeteia that is about to befall me: I must run to the bank and, before the water envelopes and digests all my cherished records, I shall desperately grope for that cherished and chosen chattel. It would be interesting to hear everyone’s thoughts and feelings when faced with a similar predicament – and whether they have different reasons why they bond to certain records – and what they would do at that frightening moment. For me, I would flash each song through my mind, and, considering factors of importance, childhood imprints and personal attachment; I would have to save…

IN THIS PHOTO: Sue Perkins

THE song below…

FEATURE: Sexual Expression and Exploitation in the Music Industry

FEATURE: 

IN THIS PHOTO: Nicki Minaj

Sexual Expression and Exploitation in the Music Industry

________

WE are living in a time where there are more cracks and…

IN THIS PHOTO: Tinashe

issues in the music industry than any other time in recent memory. Few can argue against the fact there is sexism and inequality in music: this is a known thing and something that needs to be addressed. I am not sure why, in 2017, it is challenging getting festival organisers to change practices to allow more women to headline. In fact, the word ‘allow’ seems very condescending – like they are children/animals that live in permissive and submissive boundaries. That is, actually, what is happening. There are female performers filling festivals’ lineups but there are so few headliners. I don’t buy the fact it is a case the best female artists were busy when this year’s lineups were announced – one of the rationalisations from Glastonbury’s organisers – or there are few ready for the challenges and responsibilities. I do not buy into that shared lie: why are the boys more ready and able to shoulder the pressure of a festival headline?! I think there is an indoctrinated and deep-set sexism that does not exclusively extend to men. Maybe music, for years now, has operated as a boys’ club.

The only way we can make changes – something everyone wants now – is to start NOW and inspire others. The seeming unwillingness to compromise and open a dialogue is infuriating. It seems, alongside the sexism we find in music; there is a degree of sexual exploitation that has been evident for years now. Maybe it is not a new phenomenon but, with the visibility of musicians and the fact social media/music-streaming makes it easier to get one’s face/body on the screen – are we heading down a very bad road? Before I bring my own thoughts into the debate; I want to source a couple of articles written a few years back. In the first piece, by The Huffington Post in 2014; Laura Duca’s article added a unique perspective on the debate:

“The discussion surrounding the hyper-sexualization of the music industry is much more complex than pointing out that everyone is wearing thongs now. Things have certainly gotten sexier. But there’s a fine line between defending the artists and slut-shaming them. The precarious divide between sex-positivity and pandering to the male gaze is a challenge all female performers face. With her upcoming film, “Beyond The Lights,” Gina Prince-Bythewood has found possibly the closest thing they have to a solution: authenticity.

“I have two kids, so the normalization of the hyper-sexualization is troubling to me,” she told HuffPost Entertainment. “I thought that it was important to talk about that, the underbelly of the industry. All we see are the fun parts of job and all of the great shots on Instagram. There is another world that we’re not tweeting about. It’s tough for female artists, there’s a blueprint they are forced to follow.”

IMAGE CREDIT: @NikitaKaun

In writing “Beyond The Lights,” Prince-Bythewood was very interested in the way personas are formed, especially for young female artists. That “blueprint” refers to the way they are turned into brands, forced to throw away any sense of self in pursuit of an image.

“If you are not fully formed yet and you come out with a specific persona, you lose your sense of self,” she said. “You don’t feel that who you are is good and enough and worthy of love. You’re fearful that if you ever drop the persona all that love is going to go. I mean, it is like a drug.”

IN THIS PHOTO: Katy Perry

Another article, written by Australia’s Daily Telegraph in 2014, talked about the contemporaries videos/artists seemingly showing an unhealthy amount of flesh:

“WOMEN’S bodies sell. We all know that, but perhaps no industry understands this, and uses this knowledge to its advantage, more than the music industry.

In the last few months there seems to have been a feminine flesh-fest, full of twerking tooshes titillating their prepubescent viewers.

The sexualisation and exploitation of women’s bodies is all-encompassing.

Nicki Minaj’s hit Anaconda features dozens of women gyrating their exposed flesh to the lyric, “My Anaconda don’t want none unless you got buns hun.” Classy, isn’t it?

Miley Cyrus created waves as she swung, completely nude, on a wrecking ball. Robin Thicke pushed beyond normal boundaries of decency with his pornographic and pro-rape Blurred Lines. This week controversy is swirling around Jennifer Lopez’s collaboration with Australian superstar Iggy Azalea after their Booty clip was released. The star of the video? Women’s derrières.

The clip features steamy, sexualised images of the two women in a puerile, porn-inspired dance — rubbing their backsides together.

Come next week will there be another artist trying to make money by selling women’s bodies?

They might be masquerading as empowered femininity, but what are they selling?

These female artists are selling the message that women are nothing more than accessories. Women are only of value as sexual objects. My daughters and your daughters are taught to conform to this narrow sexualised, unhealthy norm.

The message is incessant. Our boys grow up believing girls are really only here to be a boy’s “new thang”.

In fact, one more piece - http://humanhuman.com/articles/women-in-the-music-business -, written by Hannah Thacker a few years back adds another dimension:

“That is not to dismiss the existence of artists who have taken control of their sexual identity (cue respectful nods to Laura Marling’s phoenix-like return and FKA twigs’ challenging ideology), but as KATE BOY’s front woman, Kate Akhurst, highlights, there’s “a confusing message of power” surrounding the female body, and we should all strive to clarify this issue. Evidence of this disorientation in the responses seem to focus on one symbol, Beyoncé; for some she’s an inspiration, a teacher, a source for quotes, but for others her less-is-more dress sense leaves them feeling perplexed as to what equality actually means.

That being said, Beyoncé is more than aware of this misdirection as illustrated in her internet-breaking feminist essay, “Gender Equality Is A Myth!” I just hope that statements like “Humanity requires both men and women, and we are equally important and need one another” (Beyoncé) become a reality, so that gender inequality will be the myth. Many of our contributors feel very strongly on this matter:

“I hope that the over-sexualising of female artists will die down or just become irrelevant to music buyers. It’s been encouraging to see artist like Haim and Lorde grow just based on their talents and not by how much skin they show.”

— Niki Roberton, IAMSOUND Records

IN THIS PHOTO: Jennifer Lopez and Iggy Azalea in the music video for Booty

That is enough of other people’s interpretations but one sees a correlation and consensus. Reading more of the piece above; the discussion about sexism looked at festivals and the reasons few women, even a few years ago, were being robbed. Thacker argued (there is an assumption) few girls have the talent to deserve a coveted headline slot: there was a surfeit of talent among female artists that meant they were going with the tried-and-tested make option. I will come back to sexism and festivals but, alongside sexual exploitation, it is a side to music that need to be eradicated. There are, I warrant, women in the music industry who showcase sexuality and the feminine form. Let us draw a distinction between the expression and womanly: against the salacious, seedy and semi-pornographic. Artists like, say, Laura Marling, Björk and Bat for Lashes will, in videos and album covers, present versions of themselves that show their wiles, femininity and sexuality. It is this kind of ‘sexualisation’ that is completely natural and understandable.

They are not selling their bodies and offering something unseemly and provocative. It is the artists that weaponise sexuality that is causing offence. The articles I have sourced are largely from the 2013-2014 era: a time when certain music videos – from the likes of Miley Cyrus and Run the Jewels – were presenting the female form as objects. Being a man, I am one of a small band of journalists actually addressing the topic. That is not to say, by omissions and silence, the male race is culpable by association. There are plenty that shares the same revilement and concerns as me: it is, however, the case it is men, and male executives, dictating this disturbing practice. It is quite distressing, for me, being one of those men who, when presented with a very sexual and alluring video, will watch with interest. Does that mean, when one is interested (aroused, in fact) by these videos, they are as much a part of the problem? It is a complex debate that extends to industries like film and T.V. It is not quite as rampant there – and there is stricter censorship – but, if one saw a film with an age rating; they are forewarned there will be a certain degree of sex, violence and bad language.

IN THIS PHOTO: Rihanna

It is a great omission – in the pejorative sense, you understand – that there are not the same restrictions and prohibitions as one finds with films. The argument concerning sexualisation in music rears its head when certain videos make their way onto the news. There has not been a slew of outraged voices and articles for some years which suggest the issue is not as prevalent. I argue it is no better than it was but, worryingly, people are becoming immune and there is a greater sense of detachment. As part of my job; I have to watch a range of music videos every week. I look at the new Pop, Rap and Indie videos and, largely, the videos are not that offensive or memorable. You get quite a few, mind, that still treats women as objects as appendages. One might see a Rap video where the hero is cavorting with three/four scantily-clad women atop a BMW. One can say that has been part of the culture for decades but, given that view, should we be imposing controls and limitations?!

IN THIS PHOTO: Run the Jewels

Maybe certain genres are more synonymous with sex and exploitation but even saying that seems ridiculous. It is the case there is a large chunk of ‘Urban’ artists who use derogatory and sexist language in their music and, as a continuation of their lexicon, conceive music videos that continue this narrative – curvaceous and shapely women writhing around the hero. It is not reserved to genres like Rap and Hip-Hop. I know full well there are certain bands that employ women in their videos, in effect, to get their rocks off. I see so many videos that are, basically, the male lead getting off with a woman for an unnatural amount of time – seemingly, a vicarious way of indulging that Rock star fantasy. If kissing/sex is integral to a video plotline, that is fair enough – many treatments are doctored to include needless sex and sexualisation.

IN THIS PHOTO: Zara Larsson

There is an argument that suggests there are double standards at play. If a man were, say, very good-looking – and they were cavorting with a woman – that has appeal because the parties are attractive. If a less-than-appealing man were doing the same thing, then is that much worse?! Perhaps there is the flip-side that feels it is okay for sexually desirable people to indulge in hyper-sexuality because there is aesthetic value and a currency that does not offend the senses. I know there are men who expose their figures for videos; there are women who are happy to use their bodies to sell music but, even if someone is comfortable doing that, does it make it right?

It is everyone’s right to have their say and do what they want (to an extent). If a female group/performer wants to strip or expose parts of her body – why is it down to other people to be self-appointed moral guardians?! Again, one must draw the line and be consistent with judgement. One case-study of a woman whose sexy and memorable video has been a source of inspiration and empowerment is Kylie Minogue’s Spinning Around. One need only read that song title and one’s mind goes to the video: Minogue shot close-up in those now-famous gold hot pants; gyrating and alluringly dancing in time to the song. There is no doubt that video provoked dancing, copycat videos – and, yes, attraction and arousal – but is that an exception that proves the rule? Why is that video empowering and fine whilst a Rihanna video offensive and morally suspect?

IN THIS PHOTO: Nicki Minaj in the video for Regret in Your Tears

Can we divide and compartmentalise without contradicting and obfuscating? It is important not to accuse and blame certain answers: we are not exonerating or assuming any form of sexual expression is bad. I am an advocate of free expression and sexuality. There are women, as I say, who feel empowered and rebellious when they show their sublime figures – whether there are slim or plus-size). Artists like Beyoncé do not have marketing men telling her how to dress and what to do in her videos. She takes control and, as such, has used her body and femininity to convey the strong messages in her songs. How is that kind of sexuality fine and others wrong? It is about rationality and looking at the wider picture. It is perfectly fine for the occasional/appropriate use of sex/the sexual in videos – the same way it is in T.V. and film.

The young generation is impressionable and exposed to more of the world than in any other time in history. My concern relates to the mainstream where there are certain genres/artists who use each video as a chance to see how far they can push themselves – how much controversy they can create. Even if acts like Katy Perry and Tinashe pose in bikinis without portraying a sexual message – songs about L.A. and the beach requires the artist to be dressed for such occasions – is it sending out positive messages? It is important to teach a young woman to be proud of their bodies and not to be repressed and cowed. I have mentioned Beyoncé who, since her Destiny’s Child days, has used music as a pulpit of empowerment, equality and girls’ rights – showing they are a lot stronger than they are given credit for. These positive messages are being undercut by a wave of artists who are using their bodies to get streams/views. It is hard policing and patrolling the borders of YouTube without impinging on someone’s creative and human rights.

IN THIS PHOTO: Jason Derulo

YouTube and other sites are getting better at ensuring videos are not too exploitative, explicit and offensive. It is hard drawing lines and providing rationale. Madonna’s video for Like a Prayer caused a huge stir in the 1980s: there are older videos where the artist has caused a stir by flaunting too much flesh or engaging in behaviour not deemed appropriate for younger tastes. A few years back, the music video Robin Thicke’s Blurred Lines caused a stir for the images and scenes it depicted. Is there a validity and demand for sexually expletive videos? Are we in a time when the more salacious and controversial the video; the greater number of people will view it – and, as such, more money and press is generated? I will bring this to a close soon but I worry it is seen as acceptable and profitable for female artists to get their bodies out in order to shift records.

IN THIS PHOTO: Beyoncé 

I have mentioned double standards and we must be clear of the times when there is fun and empowering videos where the amount of sexual content is acceptable and, often, inspiring. It is the needless and crass degradation one sees in many contemporary videos that need to be curtailed. It is not only female artists but extras and actors used in videos that are part of the issue. Women are judged as being perverse and shameful if they express their sexuality and prowess: men are congratulated and seen as sexually assertive. There is a double standard and I am hugely supportive of women showing pride in their bodies. Whether they are plus-sized or not: being proud of their form and physique is a wonderful thing – in an age where there is stigma and judgement levied at women who do so. One cannot escape the litany of adverts who ask whether a woman is beach-ready and sexy.

It is now so integrated into everyday life that there is desensitisation in music. We can compartmentalise so that the acceptable/empowering videos; those where there is fun and harmlessness are put into one corner: those that perpetuate this idea as the woman as a chattel/object is put in another. When one divides the two, it is shocking to see how many examples of the latter are evident. How does one restrict the sexual exploitation in an industry where there is so much pressure on artists boasting viewing figures and making their videos visually engaging?! It is a vicious circle but it is clear there needs to be impositions and infractions. It seems sexual exploitation is becoming normalised and rationalised to a large extent. I shall finish by bringing in an argument/article by The Guardian – again, around the time of Miley Cyrus’ Wrecking Ball video – that raises questions and adds new input. Kitty Empire was the first journalist (in this piece) to have her say:

“Most adult pop consumers ought to be able to roll their eyes at Miley Cyrus's antics. But it is incredibly distressing that young girls' idols are constantly teaching them that their willingness to "party" is a girl's strongest suit: not their brains, or their sense of humour, or their own unique way with a key change. And as a feminist who is also a music critic, it depresses me deeply that female pop performers find it difficult to market their songs without licking mallets in the buff (as Cyrus does in the video for Wrecking Ball).

Pop performers – male and female – are often exploited by managers and record companies, but I don't believe that Cyrus is being forced to twerk by her handlers. She knows what she is doing – although any grudging respect I had for Cyrus as a businesswoman evaporated when she turned on Sinéad O'Connor in such a repellent way”.

Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett gave a balanced view when drawing lines – if the sexual content is empowering (and ordained and suggested by the female artist) then how is that worse than the same level of sexual explicitness in a different context?

“There's no doubt that women have become more and more sexualised in music videos in the last decade or so. I remember my mum being horrified at Christina Aguilera's Dirrrty video – the one where she's wearing those crotchless leather chaps and gyrating in the boxing ring (pretty tame by today's standards), but at the time I couldn't see what was wrong with it. I remember the argument, during which I protested that if Aguilera said that her half-naked dance was empowering, then who was anyone else to take exception?

Of course, I didn't really realise then that the music industry is mostly run by men, and that no matter how empowered an individual woman may feel about nudity, the apparent need for female artists to take their clothes off to sell records isn't exactly a good thing for our gender. Watching the recent Miley Cyrus documentary, I was of no doubt that this was a woman in control of her own personal destiny, but that doesn't mean that I don't feel sad that the male to female clothing ratio is so obviously off-kilter. That said, I really don't like the "put it away, love" comments Rihanna's new video has been attracting either. I don't have an issue with the naked body – it's the fact that women always seem to be the only naked one”.

Around this time; provoked by Miley Cyrus’ video; Alex Macpherson addressed Sinead O’Connor’s slut—shaming open-letter that followed the furore:

“For Sinéad O'Connor, the best way to dismantle male dominance was not to go after any actual men in the industry but to rev up that noted vehicle of genuine concern, the open letter, and use it to deliver a torrent of slut-shaming that was so feminist that it repeatedly used the term "prostitute" as a derogatory insult.

Cyrus hardly emerges a heroine herself. Certain racial aspects of her latest incarnation, such as using black female dancers as anonymous on-stage props, go beyond pop's usual magpie approach to appropriation into uncomfortable territory.

Despite being a capitalist patriarchy, though, the music business can also be a terrific vehicle for the voices of women and minorities – and what's unfortunate about this kerfuffle is that the most interesting aspect of it, Cyrus's latest album, Bangerz – a glorious record of freestyle-influenced club tracks, overblown theatrical ballads and hoedown country raps – has been overlooked.

IN THIS PHOTO: Miley Cyrus

There were voices in the piece that argued a song like Wrecking Ball did not warrant that level of revelation and nudity. Is it a case of imposing limits and discussing sensible boundaries for artists? Does this take away that idea of empowerment and free choice? VV Brown offered her thoughts:

Her talent is obvious and there is something about her new direction that propels an idea of rebellion and control. But is she empowering herself as she becomes the artist she wants to be? I question empowerment expressed in this way but I also ask why we, as women, can't be proud of our sexuality? It's a strange pendulum of morals and liberation.

As an artist, I appreciate the naked body. I have even done a naked fashion shoot. However, all artistic statements are judged contextually. Perhaps the controversy is in the delivery of her statements and the context of her past?

Despite all of this, feminism should be about solidarity first. And what's wrong with being naked anyway?”

Bim Adewunmi, in the same piece, highlighted how there is no such Cyrus-like outcry if the female in question is black. That equivalent sexuality is seen as racial empowerment and advancing racial equality. Is it a sin that is reserved to white artists?! That is another aspect to the debate but, in concluding, it seems past discussions like Miley Cyrus’ Wrecking Ball fall-out are relevant today. The so-called age limits imposed on certain videos can be easily subverted and hacked; the Internet is not secure enough to prevent all impressionable/young artists from seeing explicit content. There are moral arguments we can throw around all day but I feel there is a greater prevalence of sexual exploitation in videos tha ever before. Do we place the blame of record labels who look for big figures and infamy or those responsible for safeguarding us – and imposing guidelines on sites like YouTube? It seems like there needs to be greater vigilance and, in a wider sense, less reliance on the idea we need to use sex to sell music. It is 2017 and, with many tackling the plight of sexism in the industry, are these revealing and provocative videos…

MAKING the possibility of sexual equality impossible?!

FEATURE: Morrissey: A Rare Genius

FEATURE:

 

Morrissey:  

 A Rare Genius

________

THIS will not be a hugely authoritative and biography-heavy…

things but, instead, a loving nod to one of the most extraordinary songwriters who has ever lived. This piece is fuelled by two different occurrences. The first is the fact the biopic, England Is Mine, has been released and met with muted applause. There are a lot of three-star reviews that commended the film’s lead, Jack Lowden, but criticise other aspects of it. The fact we are supposed to be fascinated by that pre-Smiths period; the man of the hour did not approve of the film or provide blessing – one imagines he would rarely crack a smile so it is no surprise – have all gone into the brew. I have not seen the film but, gleaming reviews; it seems to be one reserved for three die-hard fans. It looks like a fascinating glimpse into a clumsy, ambitious and isolated young man and his time growing up in the North – just before he met Johnny Marr and went to form The Smiths. I am not given to over-romanticising Morrissey because he has his flaws and is very outspoken. His stance on animal welfare is passionate but often misguided – to the point hyperbole and righteousness detaches from the ethics and moral reasoning and becomes personal attacks on people who eat flesh. I am not a meat-eater but would never speak about animal cruelty/murder the way Morrissey does. Those kinds of outbursts are not reserved to carnivores: the man has taken shots at the monarchy and large swathes of society. He is, however, refreshingly honest and unfiltered in a time when people are incredibly self-conscious and wary of what they say online. One suspects he does not take to Twitter too often but, in an age where social media is as much a force for bad as it is good – the likes of Morrissey are remnants of a time when there was simplicity and directness. Mancunians (and northerners) are renowned for their wit and humour but also their plain-speaking tongues. There is nothing unusual about Morrissey but, when reading a New Statesman article that suggested the biopic was misguided – and Morrissey does not deserve to be seen as extraordinary – that is where I take umbrage.

PHOTO CREDIT: Ebet Roberts

One cannot claim The Smiths frontman has not made an immense impact on music. My first encounter with Morrissey was, actually, through his solo album, Your Arsenal. That album arrived after 1991’s Kill Uncle and a rather rough creative period. That album was given poor press and negative reviews. Many felt the album was tired and rehashing previous work. Your Arsenal arrived a year later and was an incredible turnaround. It was sharp, muscular and inspired: Morrissey back to his very best. You’re Gonna Need Someone on Your Side has a swagger and introduction similar to Footloose’s theme – in a strange way – but is a rollicking and riotous cut from the former Smiths man. In-command and at his acerbic best: a track that beautifully kicks off proceedings. The album borrows shades from other artists – Rock ‘n’ Roll Suicide’s riff/sound can be heard on I Know It’s Gonna Happen Someday – but, largely, it is the hungry and talented artist back on top. The National Front Disco addresses right-wing politics and fascism – Morrissey copping heat because of its references to extremism and racism – whereas You’re the One for Me, Fatty is the man at his humorous best. It is a dexterous and all-killer, no-filler album that benefits from the musical impetus of Alain Whyte – and Morrissey feeling the need to regain momentum and relevance. I investigated subsequent solo albums and love Vauxhall and I – the 1994 album that is commonly seen as his pinnacle as a soloist – and 2014’s World Peace Is None of Your Business. Both albums are very different in terms of themes and compositions but Vauxhall and I, I guess, complete that incredibly ripe period – following from Your Arsenal; there was a lot of determination and inspiration in Morrissey’s bones. Spring-Heeled Jim, The More You Ignore Me, the Closer I Get and Lifeguard Sleeping, Girl Drowning are some of my favourite songs from the master. I could vacillate about the solo work and all it holds but I am, like many people, adoring of Morrissey because of The Smiths.

I wanted to avoid using a song title in the title of this piece as it seems rather wasted and tragic. Whilst the actual title is a little vague; one cannot define Morrissey by a single song. The Smiths’ 1984 eponymous debut remains one of the most influential records from all of music. In a period where nothing like The Smiths had ever come about: it was a blast of light witnessing the Manchester band come to music. Formed in 1982 – I shall not get into the background and famous meeting – but feel, at that time in music, The Smiths’ arrival was hugely unexpected. Among the finest albums of 1984 were Sade’s Diamond Life; Bruce Springsteen’s Born in the U.S.A. and Prince’s Purple Rain. Some world-class albums, for sure, but nothing remotely like The Smiths. There were few standout British albums that year so, when the quartet released their debut, few people were prepared for them. There has never been a composer as individual and malleable as Johnny Marr. The way he could create searing guitar stabs and semi-orchestral rushes – almost within the space of a verse – is unprecedented and laid down the mantle from a unique and extraordinary band. Not forgetting the contribution Mike Joyce and Andy Rourke made to the band – their bass and percussion were pivotal elements in the overall sound. As much as I love their impact and talents; the incredible compositions of Marr – it is the wordplay and performances from Morrissey that makes the music stand out. I love the band’s debut but feel they went on to better things. This Charming Man is the standout from that debut and has gone on to be one of the most-respected and best-known songs from the band. Its unforgettable chorus and vivid verses stick in the mind. The hero not going out – not a stitch to wear, as it seems – and the isolated bicycle: that sense of loneliness and incredible magic one gets from the song. It is a rare form of poetry and storytelling from a man who would have been taking from his own life.

One of the reasons I connect with Morrissey is his loneliness and place in society – not feeling like he fits in and being able to connect with other people. Of course, the songs did not all speak of these troubles. The young songwriter ate and devoured literature and culture. Right from their earliest moments; characters and controversy came into the music. Morrissey would address murder, incest and sexual abuse alongside romance, dreams of being killed in a car crash and a girlfriend in a coma. There is that malice and unsettled vibe that sits with immense humour, sardonic wit and personality. In everything is passion and incredible intelligence. The first two albums can, debatable, be argued as less memorable and enduring as their final two. The debut remains essential because it was the first: that arrival and unexpected brilliance. The songwriting is incredible throughout but, apart from the odd number here and there, I do not revisit it a lot. I tend to bond more with The Queen Is Dead and Strangeways, Here We Come. Meat Is Murder contained the phenomenal How Soon Is Now? and remains one of the band’s finest songs – not on the original album but added for the U.S. version. That sense of awkwardness and going to the club: being rejected and standing alone in the corner – whilst being sountracked by that stabbing, epic guitar-playing from Marr. The Headmaster Ritual and Barbarism Begins at Home, between them, contains yelping, corporal punishment and satirising out-of-touch teachers. They are staples and highlights from the band but are not matched by other songs on the album. It got a warm critical response but, in my mind, it was Morrissey’s words and subjects that brought the album to life. Growing in confidence as a songwriter and singer; one could sense changes coming in and a natural evolution. Less reserved (vocally) than the debut: Meat Is Murder is a much more inflamed, boisterous and variegated album – both composer and lyricist pushing themselves like never before. This all reached fever-pitch heights on the follow-up: the band’s hallmark, The Queen Is Dead. Again, 1986 contains no other albums like The Smiths’ third L.P. It is a complete and fantastic work that, like Morrissey’s finest solo works, contains absolutely no filler.

Not only is The Queen Is Dead one of the best albums of the 1980s but the apex of Morrissey’s songwriting. His lyrics were at their sharpest and most emotive. One cannot listen to Cemetry Gates – where the hero reads inscriptions and finds mordant romance in departed poets – and not be encapsulated and entranced by its peculiar narrative. The title track opens proceedings with so much fascinating humour and spit. It is Morrissey’s commentary, insight and wordplay that perfectly matches Morrissey’s rampant and driving composition – one of his finest from the cannon of The Smiths. I Know It’s Over is one of the most striking and stirring from a band who were in no short-supply of emotional offerings. Morrissey’s sense of foreboding and claustrophobia makes the song one of the most unforgeable and haunting from the band. One suspects, like Cemetery Gates, some of the poetic greats were running through Morrissey’s mind when writing this. Bigmouth Strikes Again, turning the focus on himself, is about the outspoken and too-quick-to-speak. It addresses the frustration of being hounded and being forced into a corner – that pressure leads to some misguided comments (where the narrator has to confess he was only joking). Comparing himself to Joan of Arc – where her “the flames rose to her Roman nose” and the Walkman melted – it is a unique and brilliant take on a subject that, at the time, was not as common as it is now. The same can be said of the longing and romantic frustration one hears on There Is a Light That Never Goes Out. Many would rank this song as The Smiths’ finest. It is considered one of the greatest ever songs, and with good reason. One cannot ignore the contribution by Marr: that luscious and symphonic score that perfectly articulates everything Morrissey puts into the lyrics. The doomed-but-humorous combination was Morrissey’s stock-and-trade, but here, it is at its most defined and luminous.

Strangeways, Here We Come completed the band’s career – they would split in 1987 – and is s fitting and fine swansong. Containing Morrissey and Marr’s favourite song, Last Night I Dreamt That Somebody Loved Me, it is a fantastic album that builds on The Queen Is Dead’s eclecticism – even if it does not reach the astonishing heights of that record. There are fantastic moments from Morrissey throughout that album but it is tracks four-through-six that that showcase how fervent and consistent his imagination was. Girlfriend in a Coma is a short-but-not-so-sweet song that finds an ill-fated girlfriend near to death/in a near-death situation – never explained how she got there – and the hero semi-genuine in his terror and upset. It is a perfect distillation of Morrissey’s patented combination of wit and tragedy. Pathos and triumph; sarcasm and doomed romance all within two-and-a-bit-minutes. Stop Me If You Think You’ve Heard This One Before – an album with many long-titled songs – again looks at physical upset and trauma. It is the last track of the trio that, for me, defines Morrissey’s songwriting. That sense of false alarms and being safe from harm: all false, unsettled and unreal. The song title’s literal meanings cannot be misinterpreted but it is the way Morrissey presents that feeling of being alone and sharing his bed with nobody – a song that would have resonated with so many listeners at the time. It is a stark, sad and hugely revealing song that perfectly says goodbye to the band. It proved we would be hearing more from Morrissey’s incredible pen – sadly the band would call it quits before the album hit the shelves. It is not only the writing through The Smiths’ career that fascinated me. Morrissey’s singing remains unique and emotion-rich. The way he phrases lines and twists them to his own means has meant the songs have transcended from the fantastic to the peerless. Few singers have that crooner-like sound that manages to stretch and bend in all sorts of directions.

In looking at the continuing genius and influence of Morrissey; one cannot ignore every facet of his creative personality. From his work with The Smiths through his solo career – there are few that have the same attributes, talents and tells as Morrissey. He is an endlessly fascinating character and, let’s hope, there are more albums arriving from him. Perhaps England Is Mine is not the film he would have wanted to see about himself (one imagines he would have preferred to be left alone altogether) but there is an enormous affection for the Northern poet who, over thirty years since that first album, remains incredibly influential. Even if songwriters are not name-checking Morrissey; it is clear their work, subconsciously or not, derives from that early work. I can hear comparative put-downs, quips and revelations from new songwriters. None match the height and scope of the man but that is not to say they are vastly inferior songwriters. Morrissey is one of those once-in-a-generation artists that cannot be replicated or cloned. One only need listen to an album like Your Arsenal or The Queens Is Dead to witness endless emotions over the course of a few songs. There are few that can take you from laughs to horror; right through to tears and mock-outrage as the man himself. He is a legend of music who feels, like the dearly-departed poets in Cemetry Gates, deserves special real estate in the graveyard of the legendary scribes – not to get ahead of myself or morbid; I think he would approve. There is something unfashionable about loving Morrissey in 2017: he does not fit in with the cool and trendy mainstream and seems like his best days have passed. That said; the music community owes his songwriting brilliance a debt of gratitude. Those too-rebellious-for-school artists and slick-haired bands might be on your side but, you see, the wonderful and endlessly irrepressive Morrissey…

IS on mine.

__________

FEATURE: Upcoming and Rumoured: The Big Albums Approaching...

FEATURE:

 

Upcoming and Rumoured:  

IN THIS PHOTO: Queens of the Stone Age

The Big Albums Approaching…

__________________

DEPENDING on your musical philosophical bent…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kylie Minogue

you might see this year’s releases as a success or abject failure – perhaps something in the middle. Laura Marling and Sampha have provided exceptional treats in Semper Femina and Process; Lorde has brought is the staggering Melodrama; English Tapas is the latest course from the always-reliable Sleaford Mods. There have been some unexpected disappointments (Royal Blood, Arcade Fire and Gorillaz) but, given there are over four months of the year left to run – a look at the albums that are yet to come…

_________

Rat Boy – SCUM 

RELEASE DATE: 11th August

Everything Everything – A Fever Dream

RELEASE DATE: 18th August

Ghostpoet - Dark Days & Canapés

RELEASE DATE: 18th August

Grizzly Bear – Painted Ruins

RELEASE DATE: 18th August

The War on Drugs – A Deeper Understanding

RELEASE DATE: 25th August

Queens of the Stone Age – Villains

RELEASE DATE: 25th August

Nadine Shah – Holiday Destination

RELEASE DATE: 25th August

Susanne Sundfør – Music for People in Trouble

RELEASE DATE: 25th August

INHEAVEN – INHEAVEN

RELEASE DATE: 1st September

PHOTO CREDIT: Ruvan Wijesooriya

LCD Soundsystem – American Dream

RELEASE DATE: 1st September

Nothing But Thieves – Broken Machine

RELEASE DATE: 8th September

The National – Sleep Well Beast

RELEASE DATE: 8th September

Sløtface - Try Not To Freak Out

RELEASE DATE: 15th September

Foo Fighters – Concrete and Gold

RELEASE DATE: 15th September

Phoebe Bridgers – Stranger in the Alps

RELEASE DATE: 22nd September

The Horrors – V

RELEASE DATE: 22nd September

Wolf Alice – Visions of a Life

RELEASE DATE: 29th September

Benjamin Clementine – I Tell a Fly

RELEASE DATE: 2nd October

Alex Lahey - I Love You Like a Brother

RELEASE DATE: 6th October

Liam Gallagher – As You Were

RELEASE DATE: 6th October

En Vogue – Electric Café

RELEASE DATE: T.B.C.

Tinashe – Joyride

RELEASE DATE: T.B.C.

RUMOURED

Charli XCX 

RELEASE DATE: T.B.A.

Kylie Minogue

RELEASE DATE: T.B.A.

St. Vincent

RELEASE DATE: T.B.A.

PHOTO CREDIT: Matsu

Tired Lion

RELEASE DATE: T.B.A.

FEATURE: The ‘F-Word’: Why Folk Music Deserves Greater Acclaim

FEATURE:

 

The ‘F-Word’

IN THIS PHOTO: Bon Iver 

 Why Folk Music Deserves Greater Acclaim

________

I will, actually, do another feature like this...

IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell

where I, without much provocation, launch to the defence of an entire genre. It may seem insane but there comes a point where you can only watch so much undue criticism before one needs get involved. Like a decent yet unspectacular wallflower being sneered at my the jocular, ‘cool’ kids: the headmaster has to get involved and bring about some order. In fact, scrap all of that for I am far too wet to explain myself. I have read article and some reviews who claim, without sufficient evidence, Folk is a genre that seems incapable of modernising and diversifying.

IN THIS PHOTO: Billie Marten

They claim – not naming any offenders; lest they be seen as humans – that Folk is a form of music that has not ascended from the simple and hippy-dippy strummers of the 1960s. Before I take my belt off and birch their bottoms purple; I will leap, rather insincerely, to their defence. In order to play Devil’s Advocate – what an awesome title for a show that would be! – there are a lot of Folk artists who, for some reason or other, are incapable of bringing about reappropriation. Whether you deem mainstream stars like Ed Sheeran as Folk or Pop: there is something about that kind of music that is leading journalists and listeners down the wrong course. Naturally, the majority of today’s Folk stars are not going to be at the same level as legends like Joni Mitchell, Nick Drake and Neil Young – nor will they, necessarily, play the same brand of Folk. The new wave of Folk artists drink in different bars and smoke a different brand of cigarette (no that I am condoning smoking: it does look very cool in the context of a Folk article!). Sure, the artists of today take from the greats of yesteryear: it would be incongruence were they to ignore and refute the legacy and inherence of their betters. Too many assume 2017’s flavour of Folk is either the acoustic-strumming kind one might have experienced during the 1960s –away from the incredible core of Folk legends – or is old-fashioned and outdated.

IN THIS PHOTO: Julia Jacklin (Photo for Happy Mag by Liam Cameron Photography)

The truth is; twenty-first-century Folk is among the most nimble and interchangeable types of music around – I think, only second to Pop. If one listens to artists like Nick Drake and Joni Mitchell, for example, they get to hear some of the best songwriting you could ever imagine. There is variation in their type of Folk but, largely, it tends to be traditional and ‘softer’, let’s say. The lyrics are incredibly rich and poetic but the compositions, perhaps, tend to stick within boundaries. Maybe there is the assumption Folk of now has not evolved from those days – they might love artists like Joni Mitchell but do not want to see that continue forty-or-so-years down the line. I feel there is a divisionism in perception that assumes Folk is rooted too heavily in the 1960s (or before). One of the reasons I wanted to write this piece is to show how far the genre has progressed. In 2017, there are a lot of artists who like to play the more contemplative and calmer variety of the genre. I will come to some examples but there is, on the other side, a whole group of musicians who bring in other genres – from Pop and Electro-Pop right to Alternative avenues.

IMAGE: The album cover for Bon Iver's 22, A Million

Take an album like 22, A Million: the sensational 2016-released wonder-work from Bon Iver. Justin Vernon is, at his heart, a Folk artist; yet he brings, in this album, so many different sounds and ideas. There are a lot of Electronic inspirations and odd vocal samples. He processes sounds and feeds some through machines: reverses them and creates trippy, far-out whispers. It is an invigorating and heady brew that is best left to the initiated – quite a daunting proposition for those unfamiliar. He is not alone in challenging those who feel Folk is too rigid and ‘square’. Even if you take two of my favourite albums from last year: Billie Marten’s Writing of Blues and Yellows and Julia Jacklin’s Don’t Let the Kids Win; you have a couple of modern, yet bygone-nodding works.

IN THIS PHOTO: Laura Marling

The former is actually my standout from last year because it shows huge maturity and worldliness – despite the fact its author is comfortable in her teens right now. Even though a lot of the music relies on the seductive beauty of Marten’s voice: the way she unfurls her imaginative and stunning songs gives one pause for thought. It is not the aimless and mindless amblings one assumes Folk music is about. Those who get confused between mindless Acoustic-Pop and those artists the Antifolk movement rebelled against decades ago – they pick up a guitar and numbingly mumble about broken hearts, unicorn farts and the government nuking them to sh*t. Yeah, we are in 2017 so there is, one hopes, a fervent brand of a protestor who articulates the cracks and frustrations that run through the spine of the country. Maybe there will be the odd artist who does not convey that anger with the same articulacy and passion as a young Bob Dylan – others who will do so with incredible depth and conviction. Marten, on paper, might strike you as a young songwriter who had not really advanced from the same sort of platforms (literally in some cases) one assumes a busker to play on. That is, frequently, covering other people’s songs with the same sort of energy one would associate with a dog that has just overdosed on morphine – with performances that evoke the same sort of shock and boredom. I grant you, it is complicated differentiating between the genuine pioneers and those who seem beholden to bastardize the good name of Folk. Going back to Billie Marten and she, like 2017-examples Fleet Foxes, Laura Marling and Jesca Hoop; produce music that has romance, fire and enormous nuance. The reason I wanted to single Billie Marten and Julia Jacklin for special commendation because they are young and new artists but between them created some of the finest music of 2016. Marten talked about mental illness, travel and escapism; literature, love and hopelessness in a record that brimmed with compositional innovation, sensationally tender vocals and incredible confidence. Jacklin took a more spirited approach when talking about maturity, her position in life and watching others around her ‘grow’ and manifest a more familiar-orientated life. The Australian newcomer is primed for greatness and shows just what variegated and strength there is in Folk.

This year; Mount Eerie’s A Crow Looked at Me collected songs that told the listener about the circumstances of love and loss between Elverum and his late wife, Geneviève Castrée Elverum (and their baby daughter). That is PopMatters’ distillation but it is part of a wider review that heaps praise on a deeply personal and entrancing Folk record. There have been many others this year that demand closer investigation and appreciation. Julie Byrne’s Not Even Happiness and Fleet Foxes’ Crack-Up; Feist’s Pleasure and Aimee Mann’s Mental Illness are very different and unique. Look at each album and, whilst tackling Folk and playing in the genre; they deal with different issues and, actually, sound very different.  I argue there is, not only misconception regarding Folk’s sonics but the lyrics one documents. If you take a few of those albums and it is hard to connect them. Aimee Mann’s record deals with some hard subjects and tackling psychological demands – there is a lot more besides on the L.P. – whereas Fleet Foxes’ Crack-Up is a more luscious and ‘accesible’ work.

The vocals on each differ greatly and, aside from sharing Folk D.N.A., there is nothing that suggests they were born from the same mother. Maybe there is a tangible link between, say, Billie Marten, Laura Marling and newcomers like Phoebe Bridgers: the first two have been compared down to their career trajectory and lyrical gifts; Marten and Bridgers share vocal sounds (even if their lyrics are completely distinct). Even artists who approach Folk with greater tenderness and less energy are doing fantastic things – so far removed from those noxious and lamentable Acoustic-Folk acts that garnered such reaction and approbation. Bridgers is a sensational talent I can see going very far. In fact, after Laura Marling released the incredible Semper Femina (baffled it was not shortlisted for a Mercury Prize); I am looking to Marten, Jacklin and Bridgers to see if they bring out albums this/next year. It is exciting seeing young female Folk artists create such world-class music.

IN THIS PHOTO: Julie Byrne

In fact, when I look at the progressive and established Folk brilliance – most of the names that flood to mind are women. Bon Iver, Fleet Foxes and Richard Dawson (his album, Peasant, is worth your time and money) are exceptions in a list that is largely female – when we think of the best Folk albums of the year so far. That is the same as last year, largely. I shall wrap things up but have been annoyed reading articles that have mooted Folk is past its glory days – if it had any at all! There is so much attention on Pop and mainstream artists that many Folk albums get buried and reserved for smaller audiences. Even if the Mercury shortlist does not include that much Folk; one cannot ignore the sensational and consistent joys one can discover in modern Folk. I did not want to go back in time and see why Folk has always been great – I have addressed that in previous articles. I wanted to demonstrate the fact modern Folk deserves appreciation and investigation on its own merits.

IN THIS PHOTO: Jesca Hoop/PHOTO CREDIT: Piper Ferguson

There is so much range and wonder to be found in a single album. It is a genre that is not chained to a particular sound and sensibility. Maybe it is not as racially diverse as other genres – comparatively few black or Asian Folk artists – but is a lot more balanced when it comes to gender and age. Anyone who thinks contemporary Folk does not merit transition to the mainstream – and proper acknowledgement and respect – needs to get their ears on the best albums of this and last year. I have collected a few songs below – taken from some of the best Folk albums of the past two years – that provides a window into a fabulous genre. Take time to have a listen and realise the ‘’F-Word’…

IN THIS PHOTO: Phoebe Bridgers

IS one we should be teaching everyone!

FEATURE: Go Figure! The Shifting Demographics of British Radio

FEATURE:

 

Go Figure! 

IN THIS PHOTO: Chris Evans of BBC Radio 2

 The Shifting Demographics of British Radio

________

IT is interesting, a few weeks after it was revealed how much…

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

BBC’s talent was paid (annually), we get a report detailing the figures each of the radio stations has notched up. It is coincident – and, perhaps, not related – but I find it curious in regards the findings. I have written pieces stating how influential radio is when it comes to discovering new music. Streaming services are important but you cannot beat the variation and passion one gets from the radio. Whilst I am normally hooked to BBC Radio 6 Music; it is intriguing looking at the demographics of each station and whether the figures have gone up or down – and whether there is because of the music they play; the talent behind the microphone or changing tastes. Before investigating; let’s have a look at the findings  (presented on the BBC website):

“Chris Evans's BBC Radio 2 breakfast show lost almost half a million listeners in the past year, figures show.

It comes just weeks after he was named as the BBC's highest paid star.

The DJ drew 9.01m listeners a week between April and June 2017, down from 9.47m over the same period in 2016, according to figures by audience research body Rajar.

He was paid between £2.2m and £2.25m during that same year.

The figures show Evans lost 370,000 listeners between the first and second quarter of this year - before his salary was published.

It's better news for Nick Grimshaw - whose breakfast show on Radio 1 saw its weekly audience rise by 350,000 listeners on the previous quarter to reach 5.5m.

It is also an increase on the 5.43m listeners who tuned in during the same period in 2016.

Radio 1 as a whole saw its audience jump by nearly half a million between April 3 and July 25 - with 9.6m listeners compared with 9.1m in the first three months of 2017.

The figures show Radio 4's Today programme has increased its weekly listeners to reach a record high - with 7.66m tuning in during the second quarter, compared to 7.13m three months earlier.

 Radio 4 itself also reached its biggest audience since records began in 1999 - with 11.55m listeners every week.

Bob Shennan, director of BBC radio and music, said Radio 4 was "as vital as ever as it approaches its 50th anniversary".

The BBC's figures overall were "fantastic news for radio, illustrating its enduring appeal in a crowded digital marketplace", he added.

LBC's audience also increased, with 2m listeners a week between April and June 2017, compared to 1.7m over the same period in 2016.

The stations parent company Global said it was an all-time high for the station, with presenters Nick Ferrari and James O'Brien both reaching record audiences.

Radio X, which was rebranded from XFM in 2015, also reached its best weekly audience yet with 1.4 million.

IN THIS PHOTO: BBC Radio 2 D.J., Jo Whiley

Alan Brazil's breakfast show on talkSPORT lost about 400,000 listeners, with 1.6m a week in the 2016 period down to 1.2m in 2017.

The figures show the morning slot on Kiss saw its weekly audience drop slightly to 2m in the last quarter from 2.1m.

But the programme, hosted by Rickie, Melvin and Charlie, remains the most popular commercial breakfast show in the UK.

Classic FM's symphonies struck the right chords as its weekly audience increased by over 200,000.

And Heart 80s - a new station that launched in March and plays exclusively eighties music - attracted 850,000 listeners in its first Rajar quarter”.

These figures are published regularly and, maybe, one should not read too much into things. What I find interesting- the first thing, at least – is the loss of listeners from Chris Evans’ breakfast show. It is hard reading about that listener drop and ignoring the fact he is the BBC’s highest-paid talent. Not that this should split and bother his loyal listenership. Maybe there is a causal, fair-weather faction who have deemed that huge fortune as a good reason to go elsewhere. It is controversial discussing the pay findings – and why there is a notable gender-gap – but many would have been put off by the fact Evans earns a huge fortune. He has earned this – and been in the industry for years – but I feel one of the reasons his BBC Radio 2 morning show has lost listeners is because of changing tastes.

IN THIS PHOTO: BBC Radio 6 Music's Shaun Keaveny

It is interesting BBC Radio 6 Music were not heavily mentioned in the article. Of course, Evans started shedding listeners long before the furore around his earnings. What the findings show is many more people are listening to the radio. Maybe BBC Radio 6 Music was omitted because it is digital-only but I know it has picked up a lot of listeners. The ‘traditional’ stations are seeing numbers increased and a wider demographic emerge. Streaming services and digital stations pack the market and it is very tempting to listen exclusively to them. What is apparent is people are still bonded to the good old-fashioned radio. It is not a stubbornness or age thing: that combination of great music and entertaining presenters is a potent blend. It is unsurprisingly Nick Grimshaw gained a lot of new recruits. Maybe there are a lot more younger listeners discovering radio: pleasing when one thinks about how digitised and Internet-based a lot of music listener is becoming. Why, then, is radio not only surviving but growing?! Before I give my theories on today’s findings: a look back to a 2011 piece published by The Daily Mail -

IN THIS PHOTO: BBC Radio 1's Nick Grimshaw

“But it found that radio had the most mood-enhancing effect, with listeners saying that it lifted their happiness levels 100 per cent and energy levels by 300 per cent, compared to those not using any media at all.

The report said: ‘Radio is chosen as a lifestyle support system, to help people feel better as they go about their daily lives. Rather than the peaks and troughs that people have claimed to experience with TV and the internet, radio provides a consistent environment themed and shaped to suit the listener’s needsat any given time of day, and one that is generally upbeat in tone.’

Viewers said TVs boosted their happiness by 62 per cent and energy by 180 per cent, while those using the internet said their happiness was increased by more than two thirds and energy levels leapt by 220 per cent,  when compared against people consuming no media”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

Many might think it is a case of people forsaking digital technology and bonding with something simpler and vintage. That is not the case – as shown in a 2015 piece by The Guardian:

“Nearly 40% of radio listening is now on digital with record audiences for digital-only commercial stations including Absolute 80s and Planet Rock.

Absolute 80s pulled in an average of 1.45 million listeners a week with another 1.25 million tuning into Planet Rock, both owned by Bauer Media, in the first three months of this year, according to Rajar listening figures published on Thursday.

Kiss spin-off station Kisstory, another Bauer station, also hit a new high, up 21% to with 1.13 million listeners.

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

Digital listening was also given a boost by record audiences for the BBC’s Radio 4 Extra, which leapfrogged BBC 6 Music as the UK’s biggest digital-only station, with 2.17 million listeners.

Digital platforms made up 39.6% of all radio listening, up from 36.6% in the same period in 2014, including DAB radio, online and via apps.

In the London area, digital listening has now overtaken analogue, with a 46.8% share ahead of FM and AM’s 46.2%”.

Not only is the continued rise and success of radio encouraging: the fact a lot of young people are discovering the form is encouraging to say the least. I feel Chris Evans’ drop in listeners is less personality-driven and more to do with the type of music being played. I have listened to the breakfast slot on BBC Radio 2 and the playlist is not exactly invigorating and uplifting. If one wants to start their day right: you’d think you’d choose a show that had some spirited and fun music. Maybe that is a reach but I do wonder why there has been an exodus from his show to other options – Evans has been at the helm for years and has become no more irritating and unlikeable than before.

IN THIS PHOTO: BBC Radio 4's The Today Show

We know BBC Radio 4 – and stations more suited to ‘older’ tastes – has seen its marketshare increase. One cannot say it is the young vote influencing this change. In Evans’ case; I feel it influenced by the time of day and a growing need to, at that time of day, discover a different type of show/music. Perhaps it is a brief blip but I was surprised to find so many leaving BBC Radio 2’s breakfast show. Are there more compelling reasons radio is seeing a resurgence? A piece by OptiComm Media, published last year, shed some light:

“In this exciting age of digital it is easy to overlook the value of radio advertising or wrongly assume that it is less compelling than other channels.  Undeniably, the younger demographic do have a preference for listening to music using online video and streaming services via platforms like Spotify who are significantly increasing their foothold.  However, in the UK 9 out of 10 adults still tune into radio each week – that’s 48.7 million people.   Digital radio has also made radio more accessible to the masses – 58.9% of total radio listening is now via a digital platform with 30 million adults owning a DAB digital radio.

Digital radio also enables advertisers to target much more specifically based on listening preferences, region and age group to ensure the advertiser’s message is reaching its intended audience.  No doubt the day will come when listeners receive personalised ads based on a stored profile but for now, there are still plenty of persuasive reasons for looking at radio.

When was the last time you drove your car without the radio on?

IN THIS PHOTO: Russell Brand of Radio X

People do listen to radio ads and unlike TV where there is a tendency to channel hop, radio listeners do not change stations with the same frequency and are often more loyal to their station of choice.  Radio’s avoidance score is joint-lowest with cinema.  The RAB (Radio Advertising Bureau) estimate that 57% of listeners have checked out a product or service online after hearing about them on the radio while 39% revealed they have been compelled to search for something on the internet after radio prompted them to do so.

The effectiveness of local radio stations should not be overlooked.  These constitute an integral part of the community and businesses advertising on local radio can benefit from making that association and connection.  Listeners often develop an affinity for a particular presenter and think of them almost as a ‘friend.’  This feeling can extend to regular advertiser and sponsors if they get their messaging right.

Radio is a great selling tool because with the right script and voice you can convey emotion and authority and it can also be a very cost effective and speedy option.  With most stations offering excellent packages and deals that include scripting, production and licensing you really can reach more people for less than you may think and get on air in only a matter of day”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Jeremy Vine (BBC Radio 2)

It is not only the U.K. that is seeing its radio economy flourishing: American listeners are backing their stations and discovering new joys from the radio. I am interested in an article published by Forbes:

“Instead, it’s all about smartphones and other connected devices for the younger crowds, which should come as no surprise to anybody who knows someone between the ages of 15 and 19. Smartphones are now responsible for 41% of their listening, which is much higher than the average when taking into account all age groups, which is just 18%. There is clearly a lot of room to grow when it comes to streaming platforms and the older generations, which seem to have barely been tapped.

Just because millennials have all but abandoned traditional radio, that doesn’t mean the format is “dead,” and in fact, radio is still doing alright, at least for the time being.

Millennials don’t listen to as much radio as those that came before them because they have much better options these days. Younger millennials are also in a unique position, as many of their parents are young enough to have caught on to streaming or other listening options instead of sticking with radio. The popularity of streaming is growing all the time, and now that so many devices have connected capabilities and wi-fi (including cars, where a lot of radio listening takes place), it’s easy to see why young millennials don’t have the connection to the radio that older generations still do”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Clara Amfo of BBC Radio 1

Is it, then, the case millennials are not only broadening their tastes – maybe some of BBC Radio 4’s new listeners are breaking trends and subverting expectations – and discovering radio through Smartphones and the Internet? It is impossible knowing exactly why certain stations are on the rise; why Chris Evans has lost a lot of listeners – it might be no down to simple factors or sudden realisations. The biggest takeaways from the new findings are radio’s lure and appeal continues to grow. We know how popular it was in 2011/’14/’15 – this looks set to continue for many more years to come. One cannot discount the influence of digital option, though. Maybe listeners are listening to F.M./A.M. stations through devices more? It does not matter how one listens to radio: the fact it is a format in no danger of extinction is wonderful. Unlike film – where there is a social aspect to going to the cinema – one could well imagine why people would forsake radio and choose streaming sites! The traditional and loyal core of radio listeners is not being tempted and distracted by the proliferation of streaming sites. People are still going to concerts but they have plenty of time for the radio. It is a forum one discovers new artists on; finds comfort in and unearths treasures.

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

For me, radio is not only access to the variety of upcoming talent: it is the chance to preserve the finest sounds from the past. I listen to shows like Desert Island Discs (BBC Radio 4, Sundays) and, as a result, have sought-out other shows on the station.  In terms of age groups, and whether certain stations are bringing in younger listeners, it is interesting reading a BBC breakdown. Similar breakdowns will be apparent this year but I am interested how important younger listeners are when it comes to contributing via digital means; how solid the traditional core is (older listeners) – and whether streaming services are actually driving people to radio. Streaming sites have their uses but they cannot cover the same sort of ground as radio. One does not get to listen to a human being via streaming – in the way they hear a D.J. on the radio. The breadth and choices one gets with the radio cannot be easily replicated. Whatever the reasons behind the continuing prosperity of radio are; I am still fascinated by the declining listenership of Chris Evans to other stations. I do not believe it is Evans’ personality and style that is driving people away. Half-a-million lost listeners is a huge dent and one wonders what the real reasons behind that are! Regardless of Chris Evans’ popularity; I am pleased radio remains in rude health – and continues to grow in popularity. It shows people are not only listening for music content but current affairs, comedy and a variety of shows. I, for one, hope radio’s dominance…

CONTINUES for decades to come.

FEATURE: “If Music Be…”

FEATURE:

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

  “If Music Be…”

________

THERE are three reasons I am writing this piece.

IN THIS PHOTO: Björk for Dazed’s autumn 2017 issue/PHOTO CREDIT: Jesse Kanda

I need to keep this short(ish) for a couple of further reasons. The first is, having to compact my writing into an evening, there are inevitable mistakes and rush-provoked mishaps coming in. I yearn to have the entire day writing and not be beholden to the dark embers – pushing myself until the light is extinguished. I shall come to that another time but, ironically, I am writing about reviews and journalistic attention – whether it is useful and how authoritative it is. I mentioned I had a few motives for writing this feature. I wanted to look at other writers and whether they are being forced into brevity: if it is useful when reviewing an album and whether one needs to expend many words. Another reason (why this is here) is Björk (who one can see pictured above) has announced a new album is just around the corner. Her last one – 2015’s Vulnicura – was a pretty good one. Even by her impeccable standards; it was one of her most successful and assured of the decade. She is a consistent artist who does not want to rest between albums for too long. Lord knows what has inspired her upcoming album. Recent efforts have looked at nature and science: she has pushed boundaries and found new ways to create sounds and invent staggering soundscapes. Whether she continues along this line – or adopts a directness one can associate with her early days – I am not sure. Although she says it the album is coming out soon; that could mean a few months – maybe it will be out on Friday. Who knows, eh?! Whatever it is dropped, and whether a single comes out beforehand, it is one of the most-anticipated releases of the year – even though nobody heard about the album (whatever it will be called) until today. The mere suggestion of a Björk is a moment of joy and revelation. Speculation will grow and people will be wondering what is coming...about that word limit thing…!

I wanted to write this piece because, more than anything, I am reading reviews and articles that come out in the mainstream music websites; those we see in the underground sites and the big magazines. Going back to Björk and, without being too distracted, she assessed her forthcoming album, thus:

“This is like my Tinder album,” she explains in the feature. “It’s about that search (for utopia) – and about being in love. Spending time with a person you enjoy is when the dream becomes real.”

Elsewhere in the piece, Björk discusses how the rise of right-wing populism helped inspire her new direction: “If we’re gonna survive the situation the world is in today, we’ve got to come up with a new plan. Especially now, this kind of dream is an emergency.” She also talks about reuniting with Vulnicura co-producer Arca for the album, describing it as “the strongest musical relationship I’ve had.”

That snippet is from Dazed - and is a teaser for the question-and-answer/feature she has conducted with the magazine. It is very exciting and it makes me feel, when the album does come out, what kind of reception it gets. I titled the article the way I did because there is a huge irony. We all know that Shakespeare soliloquy/adage and that, as much as anything, should define music. It is a food of love and banquet: a passion that should not be prone to brief curiosity and insincerity. I find a great number of music journalists are tasked with reviewing an album and really not putting in the graft – have to keep this to fewer than two-thousand words! I mentioned how mistakes are creeping into my work – there may be the odd bit here-and-there in this article (that gets missed). It is inevitable there’ll be the odd grammar/spelling error because: A) I do not have a sub-editor and try the best I can and, B) I do better than most – consider the number of words I type a week. My reviews are unique as, simply put, they go pretty deep. Like a well-hung porn star working overtime: I go in hard and plunge deeper than a submarine.

PHOTO CREDIT: Pixabay

Expunge that rather odd nautical-cum-ejaculation image from your mind and you know what I mean. I review new artists and feel I need to be as thorough as possible. I realise accuracy, articulacy and variation are important: if one is lacklustre in one area; are they entitled to judge others?! The reason I put so much effort into every review is down of the work that artist does. They take the trouble to write the song/E.P. and toil endlessly to get the sound right. From there; they embark on production and mixing; pushing it to journalists and hoping people react to it. Few realise how hard and anxiety-provoking recording music can be. There is so much expectation and pressure on an artist: they, in turn, feel rushed into recording music to fulfil a sense of critical expectation. I am not naming any papers/sites but we all read such brief and pointless reviews. If a mainstream artist puts out an album – and ensures it is the best it can be – what use is a review that lasts only a couple of paragraph?! I honestly see mainstream reviews that distil an album into eight lines. Sometimes it can be even worse and you wonder what the journalist is doing during the day – and why they are in such a rush! It comes down to editing guidelines and making something bite-sized and digestible. I was looking at reviews for two recent albums: Dizzee Rascal’s Raskit and Arcade Fire’s Everything Now. Both albums gained different reactions – the former more positive; the latter left many cold – but it was hard getting a genuine consensus. Obviously, different reviewers have different thoughts but I saw few reviews that actually went into any details. Rather than listen to the album itself: how am I meant to get a true sense of an album’s pros and cons from the collection of barely-there reviews?! Arcade Fire’s album got a couple of five-star reviews off the bat. Those were, by-and-large, quite detailed and gave me something to go by. The mediocre/poor reviews – in terms of the quality of Arcade Fire and not the journalist – were punchy to the point of being pointless.

IMAGE CREDIT: Unsplash

They slagged the album off in a couple of sentences and that was it. Because of that, I was so confused as to whether the album was much cop. I had, say, five reviewers saying it was crap and five saying it was good – if two journalists say it is a great record, and put the effort in, does that means I should side with them?! The same was true of Dizzee Rascal’s new one. The Guardian gave it a meaty review and that was quite refreshing. I picked up some good points but felt, before I went out and bought it, I’d read a few more reviews to get a balance. The ones I saw ranged from three-to-four stars: there were few that rated it higher or lower. That lets me know critics like it – if not crazy about it – and they were pleased Dizzee was back to his near-best. Pleasing for me, as a fan, to know he has produced something better than the genuinely bad, The Fifth. I have, so you know, bought the album and heard it on Spotify beforehand – so irritated at the slapdash reviews and complete lack of passion. I have heard Everything Now on Spotify and had to make my own mind up (I will not be buying that album). I mentioned a certain Icelandic artist earlier – and have her as the cover-star – because her as-yet-untitled album will not merely be dropped into shops without it getting into the hands of critics. Maybe she will release a single before; maybe she will have snippets of songs out there – she is not someone we can predict in any way. Being a Björk album; it is going to be full of wonder, invention and the mysterious. It will have big sounds but, as it is a paen to love and hankering for Utopia; it makes me curious how that will manifest itself. I can well imagine but, before the writer graces us with the L.P.’s presence: I need to collate a few reviews and see what people are seeing. For me; passion may compensate (to an extent) for some at-times-sloppy penmanship – scansion, syntax and grammar not always tip-top and rosy – but I acknowledge this.

IN THIS PHOTO: The album cover for Arcade Fire's Everything Now

People pick me up on it and I yearn to be better. My greatest positive, I feel, is the way I approach reviews and how I dissect songs/artists. If I was charged with reviewing Björk’s upcoming album; I would provide some background and contextualise the record. I would ensure the review was thorough, concise and helpful. I worry so many journalists, even if it is a Björk record, will reduce it to a few paragraphs. It makes me wonder how useful modern media is and whether we are compressing articles to suit a short attention-span. There are culpable sites – some are really great and ALWAYS make their reviews detailed – but I want to see consistency across the board. If I am looking for some Björk reviews; I will do a search on Google and see the search results. Clicking on them; it can be quite a frustrating experience. They give the album a star-rating but then, when it comes to explaining the songs and what the album is about, often that is compacted into a few paragraphs. The artist has put her soul into the album so one wonders whether she is offended by the short and punchy reviews. I know sites limit their writers to a word count and do not like to put too many long articles online. Music is a wonderful industry and the greatest albums deserve a proper and passionate review – even so-so records need the right amount of words to justify their rating. One cannot give an album four stars and then write ten lines. What is anyone supposed to do with that?! It is happening more and more and it is making purchasing habits quite erratic. Once was the case we’d look at reviews and get a sense of what an album was about; go out and buy it and that was that. Now, people cannot gauge an album’s validity and quality on the strength of reviews. They stream the odd track and then, when everyone has had their say, will, make their own decision. The music consumer needs education and guidance: I am concerned sites/newspapers/magazines, in their zeal to be accessible and digestible, and taking a calorific approach to writing.

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

They are presenting a sparse and small meal and not providing the public with any real substance and nutrients. Because of this – and follow the diet/food analogy here – there is this anaemic and under-fed reaction. We are being left hungry and maddened by the vast array of stupidly-sized reviews. (I am aware of the irony that is on display here). I have rambled on and exceeding my word limit desires for this piece. There might be errors and omissions but, I feel, in decrying critics and their review culture have, ironically, put more depth in than they would reviewing an album. I want to be one of those mainstream critics but feel I would not be allowed to expend necessary effort and thought. Perhaps that is the way the media is but it makes me sad thinking Björk’s upcoming album will be assessed in so few words – she deserves so much more and is an incredible artist. I will leave this be but wanted to discuss something that is making me quite angry. I see a lot of people rage at the laziness of many journalists and how sites are putting out threadbare reviews. It is not inspiring the new generation of journalists and means, for the artists being reviewed, they are not provided with the attention they deserve. That creates a negative culture and makes them less inclined to make more music. We all know, dears, music IS the food of LOVE. Whether you like the album (or not): it warrants a decent and diligent write-up. For that reason, when faced with an album, there needs to be changed. Do not limit the reviews to so few words. Truly LISTEN to the album; let the imagination conspire and…

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

PLAY on!

FEATURE: Megahertz: The Changing Face of Dance Music

FEATURE:

 

Megahertz: 

 The Changing Face of Dance Music

________

ONE of the biggest changes I have noticed over…

the past few decades is how ‘Dance’ music has evolved. I use that ('Dance') word advisedly as it is hard to define what that really means. I get it is, rather obviously, music one can dance to. I was born in 1983 and remember growing up with a lot of music from the 1960s and '70s. My earliest memories of Dance music, I guess, were formed around the late-'80s. At that time, one was starting to hear those great Club anthems arrive. My fondest recollections of music began as a young child. It is eye-opening thinking about acts like Snap! and Soul II Soul. In broad terms, one sees few comparisons between them but they each made music designed to get people moving. One can quibble regarding genre-terms and terminology but, in its wide remit, there is a lot of flexibility regarding Dance. It was a glorious era – the late-'80s/early-'90s – for transformative and hugely evocative sounds. The clubs were different then: just as sweaty but not quite as ultra-modern as they are today. That seems insane as they can only be as developed as the world around them - but there is a different pulse and sensation today. I will look at today’s market but, flicking back the 1990s and it is, without doubt, one of those decades where music stepped up and changed the world. I won’t chat about the Grunge, Britpop and Alternative sounds that were setting the world on fire – they definitely had an impact and influence on the Dance artists of the time. Most people’s exposure to the floor-bangers of that period is through compilation albums. They hand-pick the ‘greatest’ Dance anthem (or whatever) from the period – in order to give a taste of what it was all about. Actually having grown up in that time meant I, like many people, had a much more tangible and realistic impression of the scene. One of my favourite childhood recollections is hearing The Key The Secret by Urban Cookie Collective. The Eurodance band hardly stuck around long – and the song is horribly dated now – but, in 1993, it was quite something.

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

Again, without sounding like I am scanning down a compilation C.D., I recall the likes of Haddaway (What Is Love) and Dr. Albarn (It’s My Life) light up the charts. I was, perhaps, a little immature to appreciate how they songs translated in the clubs but, marvelling today, I am struck by how innovative and timeless those songs are. Few would have predicted the way Dance transformed from the 1980s. I know there was a sturdy Dance scene in the 1980s but nothing as varied and compelling as the decade that followed. To me, it is the innocence and freedom of the songs that strike. There is sexuality and suggestion in some songs: the music was not as direct and one-minded as it is today. A lot of the tracks dealt with self-determination and expression; surrendering to the rhythm and purity of love - such an exciting, refreshing and moral style of music. Yes, I am not naïve enough to suggest Dance music was attending church and helping the elderly at the weekend. There was plenty of sex and rudeness stuffed in-between the crevices. Towards the end of the 1990s, there was a definite turn towards a more throbbing and hardcore vibe. Maybe, in order to shake off music like Britpop and U.S. guitar music; Dance artists felt they needed to reflect a more edgy and futuristic style of music. It is interesting how fast that transition happened and how the form evolved in the decade. I have a fondness for the Dance music from, say, 1988-1995. That was, in many ways, the first time Dance took a huge role in the mainstream and was translating worldwide. At that time, the finest Dance artists came from Europe: today, there is a greater reliance on U.S. and U.K. artists. It is interesting seeing why there is a nationality/continent change from the 1990s to the current time. There were fewer artists around in the 1990s – getting into the studio meant you probably had a record deal – so the quality-quantity ratio was a lot better.

It was that sense of fun and playfulness that struck my tender mind. I listen to the songs now and many of them have not dated. Those themes of togetherness, losing oneself and feeling good are as relevant now as they were then. If the likes of Dr. Albarn, Baby D and Snap! were ruling the charts in the late-'80s/early-mid-'90s; then it was Fatboy Slim, Underworld and The Prodigy who took over from them. The younger siblings were a lot more intense, dangerous and fuelled-up. If the predecessors were giddy and loveable from being tipsy: the grittier and more experimental Dance that ended the 1990s was sampling everything it had shoved down its throats. Acid, cocaine and heroin mixed with booze and cigarettes. I am not suggesting Dance lost its innocence and become an irascible and undisciplined hell-raiser. Maybe there was a desire for something more ‘mature’, sexualised and bangin’. It was during the late-'90s I was starting to get into artists like The Chemical Brothers, Basement Jaxx and Underworld. There is a need for clarification when we talk about ‘Dance’ as a genre. I have seen Reggae and Pop songs go into that category which is fair enough. It can, in broad terms, be seen as music that makes you move and hit the dancefloor. If we talk in pure terms: the end of the 1990s saw Dance music become more muscular, darker and progressive. The mantle switched from brilliant Eurodance to the new generation of British and American Dance artists. This country, especially, started to make its mark on Dance at the end of the '90s. Basement Jaxx, when writing their album, Remedy, were annoyed at the void that was left in Dance after the real buzz and carnival of the early-mid-'90s. The fun had gone and was replaced by something generic, repetitive and unengaging.

Something had happened between the time those classic '90s anthems were released and the final stages of the decade. There was derivative rehash and a real deflation that seemed to happen – perhaps Dance was becoming more underground and has reached a zenith it was unable to sustain. Basement Jaxx, among others, articulated a desire to push Dance/Electronic music to the next decade. In 1999, when they released their debut, new cultures, sounds and ideas were brought into the music. They added back the fun and ensured songs exploded with colour and huge choruses. Epics like Red Alert signified a return to that classic Dance sound: songs that make you sing loud and flock to the dancefloor. The Brighton duo was not the only artists to breathe life into the spluttering corpse of Dance music. I have mentioned artists like The Prodigy and Orbital. Trip-Hop acts like Massive Attack provided a shadowy, night-crawling sound that beautifully contrasted the bright and cheery Dance of the early-'90s. Thematically, things started to change, too. There was a turn from the universal and celebratory to a more insular and negative tone. Again; that is not the case with all Dance. Maybe there were doubts as we headed into the new century but I definitely detected a harder crust and less optimistic disposition. What was inspiring was how artists were pushing beyond Europe and bringing new sounds to the game. The Prodigy sampled a lot – Nirvana’s Very Ape was used on their hit, Voodoo People – and other artists were fusing elements of the 1980s (New Order was an act that were still being incorporated) and suggesting what the future held. It was a stunning clash of past and present that broadened Dance and took it to new heights. 

IN THIS PHOTO: Basement Jaxx

Basement Jaxx, Daft Punk and LCD Soundsystem were the kinds of artists who were redefining and reshaping Dance/Electronic music of the '00s. Maybe that is just a sign of time and growth but it is interesting seeing how a shift between European and British/American Dance radically transformed the genre. Throwing forward to today and I see Dance acts fusing the harder and bolder sounds of the '00s with the coquettish and spirited anthems of the '90s. The worst thing about that shift was the fact the music was tender and less relaxed: the greatest aspect was it was becoming broader and more experimental. Not as one-note as a lot of the anthems from the 1990s: the finest Dance purveyors of the following decade were unafraid to push forward and bring in new sounds in order to create something incredible. One of the worst things about an open music market is the fact a lot of today’s Dance artists employ basic elements and rely on the machine. Too many songs are processed through laptops and lean on samples and digital intervention. The vocals, often, are processed and the lyrics depend upon clichés and basic language. Maybe music, to an extent, has witnessed too much and there is little room for innovation. One of the good things about modern Dance is the fact it does not remain rooted in the present. I hear a lot of artists nod to the 1990s and that reckless light and smile – mixing it with the of-the-moment technology and demands. Dance, as a genre, is not as big in the mainstream as Pop and Alternative but the genre is still thriving and influencing artists. My big desire is to see a semi-return to the greatest Dance music of all-time: that mid-'90s-cum-early-'00s blend. THAT would be incredible! I know technologies are more advanced and the charts have modernised - I could not see many objecting to a reinvestigation of the older, more fun Dance sounds. I love how Dance music still has a place and can throw up epic tunes. The best and most original Dance songs are those that get out of the mindset of chart positions and disposability and dig deeper.

IN THIS PHOTO: Nicolas Jaar

The more youthful and BBC Radio 1-minded Dance artists tend to go for the easy height and are less concerned with preserving Dance’s ethic and pushing it on – nodding to the past and creating a balance of light and dark. The Dance music (of today) I love most can be distilled into an album like Sirens – released last year; it is the finest work from the Chilean-American producer, Nicolas Jaar. That album – one of the best Electronic Dance Music albums of last year – looks at his home in Chile and the political turmoil it faced after General Pinochet’s junta; how it is coping and the issues it needs to tackle. There is a split between artists like Jaar, Aphex Twin and Björk who represent that innovative, genre-fusing and deeper style of Dance/Electronic that brings in multiple genres and has a much more intelligent and mindful approach. There is that contrasting band of sweaty and juvenile Dance that employs anodyne beats and aimless electronics – designed to get the clubs jumping but not linger in the mind. Dance will always campaign and impress but I feel it is going through cycles. Right now, it is broader and less definable than it has been in decades. It is a wider genre that seems to reflect the cross-pollinating nature of the artists. I do miss the values Dance espoused in the 1990s but realise how extraordinary the artists that picked up its baton contributed so much. I will not put a playlist at the bottom – you can do your own research – but I have touched upon how changes and time have impinged on Dance music. It is a genre I still love but I wonder whether we will see artists embracing the quality and innovative spirit of the late-1980s and early-1990s. I shall put on the childhood bangers I love but keep my ear open to the best of the modern breed. I feel Pop still dominates the mainstream: if Dance were more variegated and consistent, I would like to feel it could have the same vanguard drive it did during its heyday. In a dark and unsettled time; that is a dream we…

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

ALL would like to see realised.

FEATURE: Kate Bush: The Continuing Muse

FEATURE:

 

Kate Bush: 

PHOTO CREDIT: John Carder Bush  

 The Continuing Muse

________

YESTERDAY was the fifty-ninth birthday of Kate Bush and…

a timely reminder of her importance and legacy. It is hard to believe next year she will turn sixty next year! I remember, as a child, being transfixed by music videos of her (in the 1980s). It was a revelatory and unforgettable time that awakened my young senses to one of the greatest figures in music history. Rather than needlessly prattle about my infantile recollections: seeing as this is a (slightly belated) birthday piece for Bush; I wanted to look at the effect she is having on modern musicians and how important she is – and why next year is a particularly special one for her. Not only will she hit the big six-zero – perhaps, not the biggest cause for cheer – but it will be the fortieth anniversary of her debut album, The Kick Inside. I have written pieces about Kate Bush before and, in so much as this will be the last one until next year, want to pay tribute to someone who continues to influence and seduce new artists. It is amazing how many reviews and interviews I take on where Kate Bush’s name is included – cited as an idol and Muse.

If one goes back to that unique and flabbergasting debut album: how many who witnessed it first-hand would imagine the world would be talking about it now?! To me, it is the greatest album ever because it has such a delicate disposition – but is full of contrasts and wonders. I can dissect the album and give a forensic investigation – I won’t, you’ll be thrilled to know – but there is so much intoxicating beauty and delicious flights-of-fancy. I listen to The Kick Inside and notice a mix of girl and woman in that L.P. There are moments when her voice is enraptured and enveloped in delirium and fantasia. Feel It is, perhaps, the fullest exploitation of his child-like persona – a sentient and delightful creature that does not bark but soothes and guides you somewhere magical. The history-making Wuthering Heights broke records – in the sense, it was the first self-penned number one song by a female artist in this country.

PHOTO CREDIT: Fish People/Kate Bush

If that were not enough – to make it a stone-cold classic – then the beguiling, The Man with the Child in His Eyes is, surely, ample proof the then-teenager was destined for legend. What makes the album such a revolution-maker was the individuality and self-belief. There were no nerves and compromises from a songwriter who, still in her teens, felt aggrieved to follow record labels and foster her creative drive and intuition to anyone else. There were arguments as to whether Wuthering Heights should be released as a single – she got her way in the end – and there was an assumption she was your average songwriter. Today, there are so many Pop stars that, one feels, are controlled and dictated-to by record labels and marketing men. In 1978, when The Kick Inside arrived, Kate Bush was not going to be a puppet.

PHOTO CREDIT: John Carder Bush  

She has created the songs single-handed – a staggering achievement then: it seems rare in this day and age – and revealed herself to be a prolific and multifaceted talent. It is important The Kick Inside gets a proper fortieth birthday next year: not meant to feel older or past its best days: as baffling, immaculate and tender as the day it was released. One cannot decay, denounce or ignore the ever-preserved fragility, seduction and curiosity of Bush’s voice. It addresses themes like coincidence and juvenile love: longing and self-investigation in all its forms. If critics were keen on the album – it was not elevated to the same heights as Hounds of Love – it has, in my view, gained immense retrospective relevance and importance. I hear so many modern songs that borrow from the 1978-songbook. If few songwriters can create something as timeless and unexpected as Wuthering Heights: suggestions and flavours of The Kick Inside find their way into many of today’s songs – not only from female artists, you’ll be pleased to hear.

PHOTO CREDIT: Fish People/Kate Bush

Lionheart (1978) and Never for Ever (1980) marked a period of expectation, creative confusion and hurried scheduled. A lot of Lionheart’s songs were compositions recorded before The Kick Inside was released – Never for Ever did not reflect the finest of Kate Bush. It was not until 1985’s Hounds of Love when that peculiar and unbelievable peacock was allowed to spread her wings – that might sound like a poor comparison but it reflects the colour, majesty and pride of the proud artist. Yes, 1982’s The Dreaming was a marked improvement and found Bush more focused, varied and assured. She added raw and almost-masculine elements to her voice; ventured into new songwriting territory and pushed herself as a composer. Hounds of Love, invariably, is the album that will get the most attention.

PHOTO CREDIT: Fish People/Kate Bush

It seemed to come out of nowhere. Few expected something as unbelievable and epic after a run of ‘mixed’ albums. Forcing herself to go away and create the album SHE wanted to create – Hounds of Love is the songwriter hitting her absolute best. Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God), Hounds of Love and Cloudbusting are the standouts. That conceptual second-side is a brave move but one that allowed Bush to create an album of two-halves. It looks at a heroine cast adrift in the ocean: looking for salvation and finding her hope fading in the dark. It is a terrifying, claustrophobic and gripping narrative that one is engrossed in. Not to skip over the remainder of Kate Bush’s albums, but the point of this piece was to highlight what an inspiring and important talent she is. Albums after Hounds of Love continued to push new ground and, aside from the odd critical miss (The Red Shoes being one), the fact Bush could continue to stun and baffle the public (and critics) showed what a unique and peerless talent she was.

PHOTO CREDIT: Fish People/Kate Bush (a promotional shot for her 2011 album, Director's Cut)

One hopes there is plenty more music to come from Kate Bush. She is sixty next year and it is a perfect opportunity for journalists and fans to speculate and predict. Maybe Bush is already working on new material or another tour? Her 2014 shows at London’s Hammersmith Apollo, Before the Dawn, mesmerised the masses. It was a fantastic and year-defining set of shows that proved what a passion there still was for Kate Bush’s music. Female artists like Madonna and, in modern terms, Lady Gaga, have managed to compel and inspire musicians but few have done it in the same was as Kate Bush. There was nobody like her in 1978 and, you can argue, there is nobody like her now. 50 Words for Snow, released in 2011, was the last L.P. we received from Bush. One wonders whether next year will see a fresh album released but, in reality, there is no rush. She is an artist who has never been beholden to deadlines and conforming. She takes her time to craft an album that she wants: given the problems rushing lead to in the early days; she has deliberately chosen to slow and take time for the music to form.

PHOTO CREDIT: Fish People/Kate Bush

She does not have the record labels breathing down her neck (as she runs the label, Fish People) and is not being hounded for new material. I can understand why that happened after The Kick Inside. People could not handle the enormity and singularity that was Kate Bush’s talent. Keen to mine it as readily and expeditious as possible – that had a detrimental effect on her quality and happiness. There is no album as free and revelatory as The Kick Inside: none as epic, sweeping and wondrous as Hounds of Love. From The Dreaming’s stunning heights and Ariel's ’scope and unpredictability – a double-album that was released twelve years after The Red Shoes  - there is so much to Kate Bush, as an artist. Each record (from Kate Bush) is a joy and completely new experience. I long to see more Bush material but treasure what we already have.

The reason I feel The Kick Inside is so pivotal is the fact it redefined what it was to be a female artist. Here was someone who did not take crap from the labels and was not going to be a controlled artist, designed to be a sex symbol. Sure; Kate Bush made the eyes water in 1978 – one of the most striking and sensuous humans one could envisage – and still holds arsenals of charm, allure and beauty. In interviews, she explained how prolific she was as a child. Writing oodles and masses of songs by the night; she would perform them to her family – some songs went on for hours; people would walk out. It was the first suggestions there was something different and wonderful about Kate Bush. This has come to fruition and, through the decades, she has become our most treasured and important female songwriter. It is the way she has translated through the years that really wows me.

PHOTO CREDIT: Fish People/Kate Bush

I feel there is no other artist that has had such a profound and mutating effect on modern music. Artists are influenced by her but redeploy her sounds and shades in strange and impressive ways. They, through her, are pushing Pop music forward and creating some incredible music. Lest we forget how important Kate Bush is to music’s past, present and future. If you are not ready to worship at the altar of Kate Bush a day after her fifty-ninth birthday: you surely must next year. The Kick Inside turns forty – its author, sixty. It is a perfect time to pay tribute to a colossus of music who has made an immeasurable impact. Until then, let us wish (a day late, admittedly) Kate Bush a massive…

HAPPY birthday!

FEATURE: Radio vs. Streaming: The Best Way to Discover Music?

FEATURE:

 

Radio vs. Streaming:  

 The Best Way to Discover Music?

________

NEXT week, time willing, I will raise a point that has been on my mind…

PHOTO CREDIT: Brooke Cagle/Unsplash

ALL OTHER PHOTOS: Unsplash

for a long time now. It concerns the monetisation of music and whether, in 2017, a music career is even possible. I know a lot of musicians but, unless you are a mainstream act, how easy is it generating reasonable profit and making a genuine career from music? So many of the artists I encounter have to work several jobs and push themselves to the ragged ends. Sure, they love the buzz of gigs but one feels they are working harder than they should be. I will look into the ins-and-outs of streaming and its equity but, putting this debate on the table; which is the most effective marketing tool: the humble radio or modern streaming services? The two are interconnected and one can debate whether there is mutual exclusivity. I am finding many bemoan services like Spotify and how unreliable they are when it comes to financially supporting artists – and promoting the best new music around. I find it is hard for artists getting attention and proper acclaim from streaming/music-sharing sites. If you are a popular chart act; it can be quite easy gaining millions of views for a music video – the latest release racking up serious views in a matter of hours. Promoters, adverts and sponsors ensure money is notched in. Likewise, they can get a pretty healthy amount of money from downloads but, compared to gig money and merchandise, it is not as impressive as one would think. I will get into that more but have realised how little of my latest music crushes from sites like Spotify, SoundCloud and YouTube. Being a journalist; I have an unfair advantage when it comes to new musicians and being exposed to some awesome humans. There is something anhedonic, mechanical and soulless about streaming sites but I recognise how popular they are. I feel it seems like the go-to solution for any musician. They feel by getting their songs on these sites, and sharing on social media, that will get (songs) into the hands of the masses.

Can the digitalisation of music and promotion really rival the tradition and longevity of the radio? The two work with one another. It is debatable whether an artist would be discovered by radio was it not for their music being on streaming sites and social media. How interconnected are the ‘traditional’ and modern in regards music marketing? It seems like they are completely separate but are more connected and bonded than you’d think. I feel there are merits to both but feel one cannot top and knock the importance of radio. I am not talking about local radio – it is good for promoting local artists but complete shite when it comes to other music – but the national options. Most of my discoveries seem to come from BBC Radio 6 Music. Before you get all smart: I know the station is digital-only. It is still a radio station and not a streaming site. Consider BBC Radio 1 and 2. Between them, one can discover so many wonderful musicians – a lot of my reviews and features have stemmed from finding artists on these stations. Perhaps I am being subjective because, when it comes to my reviews and interviews, the vast majority of the artists I feature are emailed to me – P.R. companies and various management companies contact me direct. From there, I will share the article online and it is passed into the world. I sort of avoid both streaming options and radio so it does muddy the water. Essentially, my favourite albums from the past few years have been discovered through radio – hearing a song off the record and then being compelled to investigate the full album afterwards. There is something magical and dependable about radio. It is no secret BBC Radio 6 Music is a lifeblood and sanctuary for me. Listening to the station; I am immersed in the finest sounds from around the world. The station is wonderful unearthing the coolest and most intriguing acts – aimed at a young-middle-aged demographic.

I listen to BBC Radio 1 if I want to stumble upon some fresh Pop and Dance; BBC Radio 2 for Country, Jazz and Folk – that tends to cover all the basis when it comes to genres and tastes. I supplement that banquet with offerings from Spotify and other streaming options. Each week, I collate a playlist that collects together all the singles and new releases from music – and a track from each new album out that week. For this, I get information from the radio but do a lot of exploring on the Internet. I have fallen for many artists this way and realise the ease and convenience of these sites. With the click of a mouse; I find myself in front of a menu of brilliant music. The most effective and practical way for streaming sites/social media to have true influence is bespoke playlists that employ observant algorithms and intelligence. One of the problems with YouTube is the fact it is not compartmentalised enough. There are loads of great videos and tracks but, unless you KNOW what you are looking for, it can be tricky finding great music. There are tracks recommended for you but I find these are either confusingly impersonal or misjudged. YouTube is fantastic and it is the only site I know where one can view brand-new and older videos. It is a fantastic site and does not rely on subscription fees – it is more advert-based and less controversial when it comes to compensating artists. SoundCloud does not really recommend new music and is a more basis portal to host music on – the same can be said of BandCamp. It is left to Spotify, then, to fulfil the role of guru and musical mystic – looking into my heart and taking me around every alleyway and avenue of music. Whereas YouTube could and SHOULD be better organised and lead me to fantastic discoveries: Spotify seems more intent on its playlists and supporting new artists. It is great because you can, with few exceptions, have access to most of the recorded music of the past seven-or-more decades.

Spotify works best when it comes to hosting and backing those new artists. The majority of the new releases I feature and hear come from there. I use Spotify for older music but I find it does not have the mechanism and desire to organise and arrange the best older sounds for a listener – changing upon music from the past that would enrich their lives. It is so focused on the modern and commercial - and getting those streaming figures up – it has forgotten where music came from and what it is all about. There are arguments for and against Spotify (which I will expand upon in my future feature) but I always feel ethically suspect when streaming a song from the site. I am a subscriber but wonder whether I am stealing from an artist. I do not feel that guilt when I listen to BBC radio. The reason I write this is because music needs to be preserved and nourished by future generations. So much of today’s music revolves around the digital. Is it really equipped to ensure new music gets into the marketplace and as available as possible – whilst preserving past music and ensuring it is not devalued and overlooked?! I would debate this: that is where radio comes in. It seems like there is a generational divide but, being a thirty-something chap, I have grown at a time when music and physical formats have changed beyond recognition. I am old enough to remember cassettes – the frustration of having them mangled in a stereo – and the C.D. I used to play vinyl without irony and was glued to stations like MTV and VH1 to discover the best new music around. I am not down on digital means/streaming sites – they are completely essential and indispensable considering what I do – but understand how paramount it is to share old AND new music. The streaming services seem equipped to promulgate sparkling new music but remiss when it comes to classic sounds. If future generations are to have the best music education then they need to know where music came from and how we got to where we are – not only what is around at the moment.

A lot of us do not have the time to listen to the radio and lead busy lives. The Internet and sites like Spotify allow one to dip in and out and put everything on pause. We can look in when we want and compile playlists; have our favourite songs all saved. The problem I have is, when I go to YouTube, I instantly load my saved and recommend videos – those ones I have been playing endlessly. I rarely get out of the rut and actually go searching for new music. It is hard to do so because, as I said, unless you know what you want, there are few helpful suggestions. I mentioned Spotify’s playlists. They have themed lists that range from New Music Friday to summer jams and workout songs. It is, essentially, like those compilation CDs that we all know and enjoy. If you want a particular playlist or set of songs; you are well catered for. Their new music playlist is invaluable but not as expansive as one would hope. I find a lot of songs are omitted and it is a little lacklustre at times. Radio has its faults, of course. It relies on people being in a particular place at a certain time. Unless you are listening at that pivotal moment, a band/song might fly right past. The great thing about the national stations is they will repeat songs from new artists in case that happens. I guess the common solution is a combination of both. I worry digitalisation of music will continue to the extent radio is archived and far less prominent. It would be worrying feeling our mainstream and national stations sacrificed as part of austerity cuts. BBC Radio 6 Music was threatened with closure years ago and, without that station, one wonders whether certain acts would have a career and success – such is the influence and importance of the station.

I will always plump for radio and feel it has always been the easiest and most reliable source for new and old music. If you want to discover the full range of new music; I cannot argue against Spotify, streaming and the Internet – it is far more comprehensive and thorough than radio. One of the issues is the compartmentalisation happening. So many different sites showcase so many different acts – rarely do they coalesce onto a single site/platform. I feel the perfect remedy to the divisions and issues of both methods/realms would be to join them more effectively. Whatever form that takes, I am not sure, but I am concerned about the safety and profitability of new music; the importance and conservation of older music. If some bright spark could create a way of straightening out the creases in digital promotion/streaming sites and combine the best radio stations into a single format, I feel so many of modern music’s issues could be solved. As future-hopeful as I am: we should not lose sight and overlook the great music that inspired generations. We should not be ignorant of new music and how much promise it has. When it comes to settling the question I pose in the header for this feature; I am always going to plump for the…

HUMBLE radio.

FEATURE: Globetrotting (Part One): Ten Artists to Watch

FEATURE:

 

Globetrotting (Part One): 

IN THIS PHOTO: Laurel

Ten Artists to Watch

________

THE debut offering of a new feature is always hard to get right.

IN THIS PHOTO: Def.sound

One has to make it interesting, to an extent, but modest – if they wish to publish further instalments. That is the aim here and so, as I look at ten artists who have the potential for big things in the coming months, I have hand-picked musicians from around the globe. I have a heavy leaning towards female artists: a few from the U.K. and U.S. in there. I will diversify it for future editions – I hope to put quite a few out – but wanted to recognise some of the amazing talent that is recording music right now. One or two of the artists have been quiet for a bit: I predict they will be back soon and preparing a fresh assault.

It is without further ado I provide a few musical names everyone should be keeping an eye out for…

_________

Snoh Aalegra

Location: Stockholm, Sweden; Los Angeles, U.S.A.

Genres: Soul; Alternative

Essential Song: In Your River (Don’t Explain)

Reasons to Watch: Boi-1da borrowed her vocals (from her track, Time) for More Life’s closing track, Do Not Disturb. The Swedish-born, L.A.-based artist has that Drake credit to her name but is a stunning artist in her right. Comparisons have been made to Lana Del Rey in terms of her gorgeous, silky vocals and cinematic scores. It only takes a few bars of her album, Don’t Explain, to know she is a unique artist who owes a debt to nobody. A stunning songwriter who is sure to make huge headway in the coming months.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/Snohofficial/

The Weeks

Location: Mississippi/Nashville, U.S.A.

Genre: Rock

Essential Song: Gold Don’t Rust (Easy)

Reasons to Watch: Like Snoh Aalegra; the boys of The Weeks are not new to the world of music. The brothers have concocted a potent mix of Rock that has Southern cores and a spicy element of foot-stomping and good times. Their recent album, Easy, is defined by its glorious tunes and memorable moments - from an American band who would find a lot of loving fans here in the U.K. I am watching their rise with great interest!

Follow: http://theweeksmusic.com/

Humming House

 PHOTO CREDIT: Melissa Madison Fuller

Location: Nashville, U.S.A.

Genres: Folk; Bluegrass

Essential Song: Takin’ Over

Reasons to Watch: The Bluegrass is modern but has some vintage touches; the Folk romantic but imbued with a distinct forwardness. Justin Wade Tam leads the band with warming, intelligent and nuanced lyrics. The band comprises a Soul-singer, sociology professor and composer (among others) and, since their eponymous debut album in 2012, the group have built a solid core of fans in the U.S. Another one of those bands who has a fanbase in other nations but not, necessarily, the big festival bookings they deserve. New single, Takin’ Over, shows they are getting stronger and more intent with each track – without compromising the sound that won them so many hearts.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/humminghousemusic/

REWS

 PHOTO CREDIT: Jonny Finni

Location: London, U.K.

Genres: Alternative; Alternative-Rock

Essential Song: Miss You in the Dark

Reasons to Watch: The London-based female duo, like the guys of Humming House, seem to grow more intent and confident with each song. Miss You in the Dark is the latest epic tune from Collette Williams (Percussion and Vocals) and Shauna Tohill (a Belfast-born musician on Guitar and Lead Vocals) and, together, they are a superb force getting huge gigs and festival bookings. At the root of their music is a sisterhood and shared love that propels their immediate and punchy songs to the next level. One of those acts who is going to ascend to the mainstream and carve up a huge slice of land for themselves – one of the most exciting British acts of the moment.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/wearerewsmusic/

Billie Black

Location: London, U.K.

Genres: Alternative; Singer-Songwriter

Essential Song: I Don’t Need Another Lover (EP 000100)

Reasons to Watch: It is hard to believe the young London treasure Billie Black is unsigned! There has been some social media dormancy over the past couple of years but, if Instagram posts are to be believed, there could be new music in the works. Music infected her from a young age and she soon got hooked on Jazz – taking part in the Guildhal Jazz Course and gaining entry into the BRIT School. Assimilating underground Electronic tones into that Jazz teaching: she is still putting material together and building her name but I feel this is the year she announces her presence to the world.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/thisbillieblack/ 

MIYNT

PHOTO CREDIT: Andreas Öhman

Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Genres: Alternative; Rock; Soul

Essential Song: The Deer or the Hunter (EP No. 1)

Reasons to Watch: It is hard to categorise and define someone as varied and cross-pollinating as MIYNT. Her songs range from the affecting romance of The Strangest Game and The Deer or the Hunter to the cool-ass-yet-wary grooviness of Cool – to the Rock-laden sentiments of After the Gold Rush. More work is forthcoming but, on the strength of EP No. 1 alone, it is clear there are no boundaries and confinements for a curious and hungry artist who has a lot more to say.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/miynt/

Maddy Storm

Location: Manchester, U.K.

Genre: Art-Rock

Essential Song: Tempest

Reasons to Watch: A daring and original songwriter whose reverb-heavy songs are bustling and brimming with passion and intensity. Her debut E.P., To the Sun, was met with acclaim and marked out as an artist to keep an eye on. Her new single, Tempest, is made for dark evenings and contemplation. She makes music, as she claims, that is best heard in the dark – a strange aura and mysticism emanates from her sound. In a music scene that can be quite dull and predictable: there is nothing average or uninteresting about the young British songwriter.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/maddystormmusic/

Def.sound

Location: Los Angeles, U.S.A.

Genres: Progressive-Rap; Contemporary Art

Essential Song: BL▲CK . MIRROR (S)

Reasons to Watch: Many have highlighted the impulsiveness of def.sound off the back of recordings like Kings of Neon (2015). He is a polymath and multi-talented poet/songwriter who pours his soul into his work. Documenting turmoil, triumphs and conquests: there is something alluring and captivating about the America. He has the confidence of Kanye West without the ego; the skills of Kendrick Lamar without the acclaim – he is a unique soul but one who warrants future success and worldwide acclaim. 

Follow: http://cargocollective.com/defsound

Laurel

Location: Southampton/London, U.K.

Genres: Alternative; Pop; Soul

Essential Song: Maybe Baby

Reasons to Watch: It is the voice that compels and seduces: few have the gravitas and allure of Laurel. One could compare her to say, Amy Winehouse, but that would be an easy (and lazy) resemblance. What the London-via-Southampton artist does is create her own unification of older-days smokiness and modern-day sexiness. Her earliest recorded were laid down in her East London bedroom studio: one suspects modern studios and big recording spaces await her in years to come. Right now, she embarking on tour dates – she is in Switzerland at the moment – and, one suspects, provide the music world with some fresh sounds. One of our brightest and most intriguing young talents.

Follow: http://www.classiclaurel.com/

JAIN

Location: Toulouse/Paris, France

Genres: Pop; Alterative

Essential Song: Makeba

Reasons to Watch: Like many of the names on this debut list; it only takes a few breaths from JAIN to know she is a very special artist. Her phenomenal album, Zanaka, hopped the globe and introduced a range of sounds into the mix. Few artists are as bold and authoritative when blending so much into a record – it almost seems easy for the French songwriter. Right now, she is performing in France but has dates in the U.S. later in the year. I hope she has chance to come to the U.K. at some point because she is getting into the hearts of critics and music-lovers alike. A loveable, worldly and astonishing talent who is primed for the big leagues.

Follow: http://www.jain-music.com/en/

FEATURE: Transgenderism in the Music Community: The Final Taboo

FEATURE:

 

Transgenderism in the Music Community: 

IN THIS PHOTO: Aye Nako

 The Final Taboo

________

THERE has not been any major story where a transgender musician…

IN THIS PHOTO: Rita Ora (one of the artists involved in the video, Celebrities Speak Out Against Donald Trump's Transgender Military Ban)

has rocked the charts: nor has there been a howling execration of the transgender community by anyone. Well, hang on a second…back that up. The most powerful man in the world – God help us all – has imposed a military ban in the U.S. President Trump has banned transgender people joining the armed forces: this was met by a wave of discontent, disagreement and opposition. Singers like Sia, Rita Ora and The Chainsmokers have teamed up to send a message of support to the transgender community – Lady Gaga slammed Trump as did Mia Farrow and Laverne Cox. Of the 150,000 transgender Americas, all of whom are loyal and patriotic, that incongruence and foolhardy declaration is, whilst typical of Trump, against the desires of the American people. In a weird way, it has put the issue of transgenderism under the microscope. This piece is not propelled and stocked by interviews with transgender musicians. In the past, I have reviewed transgender artists – but not as many as I would like. I have featured gay and bi-sexual artists but, again, not quite as many as I would want. The Office for National Statistics does not, at present, hold figures regarding the number of transgender people living in the U.K. It makes a sense of invisibility and prejudice heightened. It might be difficult cataloguing those undergoing gender reassignment and consultation. Roughly, however, around one-percent of the British public identifies themselves as gender non-specific. Pansexual-ism is a new phenomenon but one that acknowledged the fluidity and multifarious rainbow of modern sexual identification. In broad terms; pansexual people do not limit their preference in terms of gender and sexual identity. If the country is starting to open to the fact so many people are identifying themselves as gay, pansexual or bi-sexual: how much tolerance and discussion is taking place regarding transsexual people? The reason I want to raise this corner of modern society is because of music and how there is still prejudice. In many ways, the industry is more open-minded than society as a whole.

In other ways, one feels there are struggles for new artists coming through – those who identify themselves as transgender. Anohni – formerly Anthony Hegarty – is an artist very open about her decision and identity. Sexuality is, not any more, a binary choice. It was the time, not long ago, one had to choose between gay and straight. Now, there is an encyclopaedic variation to sexuality that has a great number of configurations than there has ever been. If one looks to the music industry and there are some fantastic humans who are either transgender or non-binary. Ezra Furman is an artist I have great respect for. Perpetual Motion People, Furman’s current album, boasts raspy vocals and a fearlessness that is not confined to the mainstream and convention. One wonders whether his sexual freedom and lack of confinement influences and infuses his musical direction. Little Waist are a Queercore/Transcore band from Brooklyn, N.Y. whose lead – multi-instrumentalist, Audrey Zee Whitesides – is one of the most impressive and eye-catching artists one can discover in Brooklyn. Maybe cities and areas like that embrace openness and frank sensibilities of liberation. A lot of musicians evolve and move from towns where, in so much as there are fewer opportunities, there is a small-town mentality. I am not suggesting population size is inversely tied to discrimination and tolerance but there is a link. Cities allow one to, whether they like it or not, discover humans in every walk of life and persuasion. One takes a trip through Brighton by night and is aware of a colour and vivacity few cities can project during the hottest summer day. It is an area of the world synonymous with its thriving L.G.B.T.Q. community but its people, inherently, have a greater acceptance than most. The same can be said for London who, alongside Brighton, holds an annual Pride festival/celebration. We have just commemorated the fiftieth anniversary of the Sexual Offences Act.

IN THIS PHOTO: Ezra Furman

In 1967, it was still illegal for two men to express their love in public – not sure whether women were excluded too. It is developments and milestones like this that means there is less stigma attached to sexuality and lifestyle choices than generations-past. I still worry whether artists like Aye Nako – the band address racial fetishisation and sexual identity through their music – and Mel Blum (a New York singer-songwriter whose self-deprecating and honest music has captivated critics) have had to fight harder to enter music. Whether they are afforded the same opportunities as their peers – in terms of gigs and media spotlight – I am not sure. I am cribbing from the hallowed electronic pages of WhatCulture and a piece they put out on the subject of transgender artists. They bring a few other examples together:

“Tunde Olaniran, who identifies as genderqueer, has been putting out his playful electronic music for a couple of years now and shows no signs of getting any less theatrical. Every song constantly bounces around between quirky R&B and beats bearing the bawdiness of a buzzsaw. This desire to never settle in a singular musical aesthetic keeps his albums endlessly interesting. There is an allegiance to club music as well as a desire to dismantle it…Against Me! is a punk band from Florida fronted by Laura Jane Grace. Their albums are short bursts of ridiculously anthemic songs that contain darkly humorous lyrics referencing both the personal and the political. The accessibility of the band's anger harkens back to some of the most iconic names in punk. After a public coming out in 2012, followed by the resignation of several of her bandmates (for unrelated reasons), Laura Jane Grace became something of a poster child for the trans* movement (albeit not its spokesperson, to heave the entirety of a movement on a single person or several people is ignorant as all heck). Her deeply personal songs about gender identity on 2014's Transgender Dysphoria Blues provided for the band's most impassioned effort to date”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Tunde Olaniran

What one gleams from the list from WhatCulture is the fact the majority of these artists are American. Also, it seems all of these artists have to justify themselves in a way – proclaim how unafraid and determined they are. That is a courageous and inspiring attitude but, in 2017, should they have to shout so loud and frequently?! I know there are some fantastic underground transgender artists in the U.K. – many seem resigned to the underground through fear they would not be able to assimilate into the mainstream. There are many other frames of reference one can ascribe to the debate but, ironically, their struggle is binary – having to choose between being who they are, and enjoying minor attention and acclaim, or having to compromise. Maybe this is not the case for the artists I have mentioned but, as we know, there is a lot of prejudice and discrimination still rife in music. Is transgenderism still the only taboo in the music industry?! Despite the fact we have Pride celebrations and join together once a year – what is the reality for a gay musician in the modern world? Artists like Billy Tipton, Pete Burns and Wendy Carlos – composer on films like Clockwork Orange and Tron but, unbeknown to many, she is sort of the mother of modern Electronic music. They, in many ways, have helped normalise transgenderism and take away the exotification aspect of it – seeing it as rather fruity and strange. In society, there is taboo attached to coming out: those who decide to choose another gender have to go through so much anxiety and fear. If a musician has had to overcome that: how accepted are they likely to be when it comes to the mass media and charts? I write with authority because I know there are fantastic transgender musician who yearn to assimilate and align with those in the mainstream. Sexuality and gender should not be an issue with regards music. If, in 2017, we are seeing sexism and racism; where on the list of priorities is sexuality and transgenderism?! Whilst those in the music industry crunch numbers and toil over algorithms: how much consideration is being lent to the human beings behind the music.

IN THIS PHOTO: Against Me!

It is dastardly and deplorable seeing such rampant inequality in any sector of society: the fact it is extends to music is quite alarming. Transgender artists, in addition to homosexual musicians, should be allowed to play with unexpurgated relief and freedom. I feel there are alleyways of the music industry that needs to tackled and addressed. There should be no fear in the music industry. It should be an open forum where artists of every sexuality, gender and race should be able to perform and succeed on equal terms. That may sound awfully naïve but it is merely a case of taking action. I am concerned those musicians who are transgender – or non-binary – have enough anxiety in their heart without having to deal with spiked tongues and appalling looks. I know artists here – and around the world – who are exceptional musicians and transgender. They do not want to play to certain clubs and create a particular brand of music. They want to be accepted and have the same platforms as every other musician. If Trump is determined to prohibit transgender people entreating the armed forces: the passionate protest from musicians in the U.S. and U.K. is heartening to see. The focus should turn to music and, as we tackle sexism and racism – and try to affect real change – we need to look at sexuality and transgenderism. These kinds of issues are quiet heavy and, in regards musicians who face discrimination, there is a great weight for them to bear. Because of that, it is incumbent on the rest of us to create dialogue, positive exposure and raise our…

IN THIS PHOTO: Anohni

ARMS to help support them.

FEATURE: The Hyundai Mercury Prize 2017: The Best of British?

FEATURE:

 

The Hyundai Mercury Prize 2017:  

 The Best of British?

________

I shall keep this short but, seeing as the chatter regarding…

IN THIS PHOTO: Ed Sheeran (his album, %, drew criticism from many who felt it should not be on the Mercury shortlist)

this year’s Mercury Prize shortlist has died down; I wanted to examine it from both sides and ask the question as to why it has quietened down so readily. Last year, as I remember; people were talking about the nominations for a little while longer. Why has this year’s dozen artists not lingered in the attention as long as previous years?! Perhaps I am over-analysing because, as with every awards show; people are only going to be interested a short time – the actual awards are not for a while so it would be illogical being enthused for weeks on end. Many have been debating whether this year’s list of artists is the weakest we have seen in recent memory. Last year, we had the likes of David Bowie and Radiohead on the shortlist: this year, the impressive, but perhaps less-stellar nominations of Sampha and alt-J. I wondered why the panel decided to omit critical favourites such as Laura Marling, Sleaford Mods and Jane Weaver in favour of Ed Sheeran, Blossoms and alt-J – three artists whose most-recent albums were not as popular and well-received as the aforementioned? Someone I know on social media asked whether the Mercury Prize should be about brand-new artists and giving them a platform. To me, it should be a meritocracy: the finest British albums making the cut of twelve. In fact, I am starting to find myself siding with the friend. If we are going to have an award for British artists: should we be dedicating it to underground and hot-off-the-press acts? Sampha and J Hus are two-such artists who would fit the bill; in that sense, Blossoms would also fit – I argue we should substitute them with IDLES to make it more quality-driven. This year’s list of nominees is ethnically diverse and certainly covers a range of genres – from Sampha’s beautiful and soul-searching songs to the extraordinarily unique sounds of The Big Moon and Dinosaur.

In fact, The Big Moon – and their album, Love in the 4th Dimension – is a proper band-made record that gives me hope in Britain we have some of the finest groups around. Dinosaur might be seen as the rank-outsiders for 2017 – seeing as their album, Together, As One, is a Jazz record. The ‘J-word’ might bring about scowling in many but for me, who loves legends like Miles Davis and John Coltrane, can see the same majesty and depth that runs through a record like Kind of Blue (Miles Davis). The Laura Judd-led band might not win the Mercury but are a worthy inclusion. On the other side of the argument; there are lesser albums like Ed Sheeran’s Divide (or %) and Blossoms' eponymous debut. Both albums reflect mainstream sensibilities and seem to address a different market. In the past; the Mercury Prize has been about Indie music and bands: in recent years, there is a sonic and demographical shift to address the changing nature of modern music. I admire an award that recognises a broad demographic but one can argue the BRIT Awards has enough categories for artists like Ed Sheeran and Blossoms: are they encroaching on foreign territory and taking too much focus away from other artists?! I feel there need to be limits when it comes to award ceremonies and the likes of the Mercury Prize. You could say there should be no limits imposed when it comes to celebrating music – if it is good then it deserves to be credited and acclaimed as much as possible. The panel of the Mercury Prize has, especially in the last couple of years, started to recognise Urban acts – those who are more fiery, charged and fast-flowing than their peers. Skepta scooped the award last year for Konnichiwa: this year, we have Stormzy’s incredible debut, Gang Signs & Prayer vying for the gong – it is already tipped as one of the favourites. I love the fact black artists are being given nods: last year, Kano and Michael Kiwanuka were on the list; this year, Sampha and Loyle Carner join Stormzy in that respect. It is clear the organisers and bosses are making positive shifts when it comes to racial equality and recognising genres like Hip-Hop, Rap and Grime.

IN THIS PHOTO: Loyle Carner (his debut album, Yesterday's Gone, is one of the favourites for the prize)/PHOTO CREDIT: Sonny Malhotra 

Is it, therefore, hypocritical criticising a more Pop-driven motive if we are going to celebrate the resurgence and recognition of Urban acts?! That is a fair point because I think, more than anything, the Mercury Prize should not be stifled, homogenised and rigid. Looking at the twelve artists; there are very few women nominated – Kate Tempest, The Big Moon and Dinosaur are overcrowded by a largely male dozen – and that is something that needs to be addressed. If we get it back to new artists and recognising them: is it causing issues cramming mainstream artists and upcoming talent in the same award list? I think an award that limits to a single list of twelve is going to cause splits when you include everyone from British music. Should we, then, make the Mercury Prize solely about the best-established artists are limit it to debut acts and underground musicians? I think there should be an award ceremony that has various categories that is exclusively for unsigned and new acts. I see so many great bands and artists come through the underground: they do not have their own award show and it seems rather strange. Many would say the point of a music award is to celebrate an artist that reaches a certain level/audience. Does that refined assumption mean we are deliberately overlooking artists who, despite their tender experience, are superior to the so-called ‘best’? It is thorny and complicated but we need to establish another award show that goes away from the mainstream and recognises new and unsigned acts. I feel the likes of the BRIT Awards are too focused on the mainstream and less-effecting artists – niche awards like Q, Kerrang! and MOBO caters to certain tastes but are confined to a certain taste/genre. I am aghast BBC Radio 6 Music does not have an award show as they, with their wide remit, would probably cure the malady. Taking it back to quality and, whatever your viewpoint, the Mercury Prize should ONLY represent the twelve BEST British albums of the year. It is not solely about new artists or mainstream; it is not about making things diverse and overhauling old practices. Like film awards; music ceremonies should reflect quality and the absolute finest of the sector.

IN THIS PHOTO: Blossoms (their eponymous album is one of the twelve that has been nominated this year)

The Oscars have been accused of racism and ignoring the best black actors around. Music, in a way, suffers racism and sexism but, as we can see from the list of nominations for the Mercury Awards – the last few years, especially – we are making strides, at the very least (bigger than the Oscars, that is for sure!). I feel the Mercury Awards should solely reflect the very finest British albums of the year. We want to showcase a prestigious award that promotes the absolute pinnacle of British music. Whether that is new musicians (unsigned acts) or mainstream stars: it should be about the sheer quality and critical acclaim. I admire the need to diversify and expand the Mercury nominations and give nods to lesser-known artists. If it weren’t for the Mercury Prize; would the likes of The Big Moon, J Hus and Dinosaur get acclaim and recognition anywhere else? Kate Tempest would do alright elsewhere but one feels she would be overlooked by the looks of the BRIT Awards and other ceremonies. We can create a shortlist that reflects diversity and genre-mix; included a fair balance of black-male-female artists and a sprinkle of bigger albums and underground treasures. If you take British albums in terms of quality/critical acclaim alone, then three albums that should be on the list are Paul Weller’s A Kinder Revolution; Laura Marling’s Semper Femina and Sleaford Mods’ English Tapas. Take away the less-than-effusive reviews accrued for Ed Sheeran, Blossoms and alt-J and, not only would you still keep the genre-spread clean and solid, but would bring in an older artist, a female performer and a consistent duo – not only improving the quality but adding diversity into the mix (the all-male artists all playing mainstream-ready sounds as opposed to the trio that would take their place). Even those small changes would placate the critics of this year’s list and ensure the Mercury Awards recognise the very best British albums – that revised list, surely, would be the absolute cream of the crop?!

In fact, one could remove J Hus (sorry!) and have IDLES take his place. It might be a step too far but it would show we are making cuts based on quality and no other factors. Maybe I am overthinking things but I take music seriously – and feel British music is the very finest in the world. Given the fact there are only a dozen spots on the Mercury shortlist; could we ever please everyone and make it perfect?! Perhaps not but I feel there is, in an attempt to broaden the nominations (genre and sound) a danger it is becoming too broad and less focused. It is clear this year’s shortlisted artists have provoked conversation and debate. There were some definite notable omissions which make me wonder what the criteria was for this year’s line-up. I know the race will come down to Sampha, Kate Tempest and Loyle Carner: it is clear people favour artists who write their own stuff and have a diverse and astonishing palette – not songs with endless credits on them; sallow and generic sounds. I shall leave it there but wonder whether, next year, we need to implement some guidelines or review – ensure the Mercury Award retains its reputation as one of the finest (if not the very best) awards of the music calendar. Whoever wins the award on 14th September – the fact the official site for the Mercury Prize does not mention when it is happening or where it is taking place is quite poor! – should be commended. Put all the arguments and nitpicking aside and this year’s Mercury Prize is going to be…

A hugely memorable evening.