FEATURE: Season’s Bleatings: Will Advertisers Ever Strike the Right Musical Tone for Christmas?

FEATURE:

 

 

Season’s Bleatings

767676.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sir Elton John stars in the latest Christmas advert from John Lewis/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images/John Lewis 

Will Advertisers Ever Strike the Right Musical Tone for Christmas?

__________

OVER the next couple of weeks…

77.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @jasmint/Unsplash

we will see more supermarkets and retailers unveil this year’s Christmas adverts. Invariably, these adverts will be accompanied by pieces of music and it got me to wondering about tone and popularity. In visual terms, we have seen some rather memorable examples through the years. Whether they are going for something sappy or emotionally vulnerable; playing or cheesy or going for cute – the more exclamations of “Awww!” and “Ooohhh!” we can draw then the better! Usually, we will get a family scene and, animated or live, a child bewildered by the joy of Christmas or some cute animal leading the way. I am not usually emotional when seeing the adverts – as they are not real and are designed to hock the products of a huge and rich company – but I can understand why some people might feel a bit teary with some of them. I have no objection to the nature of the adverts and the fact they are designed to make money and play on our emotions but, when it comes to the music side of things, has anyone ever got it right?! I am one of these people who wonders why the ‘classic’ Christmas tunes/carols cannot be used for adverts? I realise these companies want to blend the modern with classic so they tend to have something quite classical and comfortable regarding the themes/scenes of the advert and then bring in a modern reworking of an older song. There might be a commercial or emotional reason why we see, every year, the same sort of singers featured and the type of songs used.

am.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Amelia Warner (Slow Moving Millie)/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Slow Moving Millie covered The Smiths’ Please, Please, Please Let Me Get What I Want for John Lewis in 2011 and, whilst permission was given to use the song, the results were sadly familiar. It seems there is a particular tone and dynamic for every seasonal campaign. In 2015 – a few years after the aforementioned John Lewis campaign – another female singer, Aurora, covered Half the World Away (Oasis) for their Christmas pitch (see below). Whilst each advert had varied success – the latter was a more controversial and divisive one with an elderly man on the moon; the former more traditional and less ambitious – they were very similar in terms of songs. Both, strangely, used songs by Manchester bands; both tracks (the originals) are quite emotional but were transformed in the hands of the new vocalists. Each song title suggested family, unity and a need for togetherness; a yearning and hopefulness coming through but, sadly, each rendition bleached the original song and delivered something rather lumpen into the stocking. I realise it is lazy to rehash Christmas carols or can be tricky getting rights to play an existing song but the dynamic of employing a breathy/sweet female singer and having various shades of beige presented each year does take the edge off of things.

I do wonder whether the way we react to Christmas adverts is too strongly influenced by the songs. I realise the words and deliveries are meant to add to the advert and convey a clear message but so many of the songs are listless and mediocre. There are articles like this that rank the Christmas ads and collate the best but, as we have become more advanced and given more options; the nature of adverts has become narrow and singular. Older adverts have switched between live action stories and concentrated on different aspects of Christmas – heightening the appeal of the food or focusing on charity and togetherness. The last few years, more and more, are relying on schmaltzy and saccharine concepts, albeit some are done with ingenuity and a fresh angle. Whether there is an animation or something visually arresting; there is a certain amount of sappiness and caramel that has replaced invention and variation. I guess, when advertisers limit their palette and spectrum, the music has to match. The choice of singers is bafflingly limited. Every year, it is another female singer who seems to be cut from the same cloth as every other Christmas advert-scoring performer. The choice of cover versions is odd and, like I said, the cover versions are rather limp and pointless. I do wonder whether advertisers need to think about the music/singer choices and understand the music that accompanies their visuals can be as compelling as anything – often eliciting more emotion and potency than the film itself.

66.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @mtaneva2001/Unsplash

Apart from the ‘banned’ Iceland T.V. advert – one that has an ecological message that rallies against our overuse of palm oil and how it is affecting the environment. The advert was banned on the grounds it is too political and controversial. People are campaigning for the ban to be lifted and it is one of the rare occasions where an advert’s message has outshone anything else (in a negative or divisive manner). Look around at the past six or seven years and it has been the same slew of rather anodyne and un-festive musical offerings. Maybe this year will see a sea change but it seems Sainsbury’s’ latest advertising commercial, not only goes down Sap Lane, but treads very close to a John Lewis campaign. The setting and visuals are reliably nauseating and family/child-orientated – advertisers assume Christmas is reserved for children and completely lost on adults – but the music choice, again, is stilted and odd. You cannot accuse the child who sings the New Radicals’ You Get What You Give of being the same as Slow Moving Millie and the usual parade of rather vanilla-scented singers but there is something completely offputting and pointless about the ‘musical aspect’. Like many other adverts that use popular songs; someone has taken the lyrics/title and thought to themselves it would be perfect for their campaign. Not only does the 1990s classic have nothing to do with Christmas but it means, again, a great song has been tortured and strangled.

Luckily, retailers like Tesco and Marks and Spencer have avoided major music faux pas. The former barely has any music at all whilst the latter, featuring Tom Jones, has at least avoided the usual traps that retailers get themselves into. I think music can heighten an advert, if done right, and help compliment the visuals. That is what the aim is, surely?! Advertisers need to think about striking the right tone without offending or being boring. I wonder why the classic Christmas songs are being avoided and why Carols cannot be reimagined. If people do insist on picking popular tracks and getting someone modern to sing them, there needs to be a rethink and rebranding. I would like to see more soulful voices chosen and songs that have a more ‘Christmas feel’. There seems to be this divison between companies like Sainsbury’s tackling a well-known song or others, like Lidl having a more traditional background. In either case, I feel something is missing and a great imagination needs to go into the musical choice. This brings me to the latest Christmas advert that, whilst bolder regarding its music and focus; it has drawn some sighs and suggestions from people. John Lewis, realising the machine-processed identikit singers wrecking some northern classic is not the right approach.

Whilst they have cranked up the saccharine to the maximum – I do have a heart somewhere! – the musical decision, again, has drawn some provocation. The Guardian explains why they some doubts regarding Sir Elton John’s appearance in the latest advert:

The 2018 John Lewis ad is heartwarming. Elton John sits alone at his piano, playing Your Song while moments of his life flash before his eyes. He sings in a stadium, he sings in the studio, he sings in a pub, he sings at a school concert. It’s a very sweet advert with a very simple message: somebody better call Elton John an ambulance right away, because this is exactly the sort of thing that happens right before you die.

In fact, the advert is probably too heartwarming. Just a few weeks ago, the Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody was heavily criticised for its toothless portrayal of Freddie Mercury’s worst excesses, and the same could be said for the John Lewis advert. Elton John isn’t a great pop star because he sings songs about little dancers, crocodiles that rock and being able to stand up. No, Elton John is a great pop star because he is knotty and complicated and, well, a bit of a dick sometimes”.

Musical memories start to flood by and, just when you think the sugar-sweet visuals cannot get any more tear-jerking; there is a bit of humour and surprise thrown in:

The music now reaches a crescendo, and then …

It’s Christmas morning again. Elton finishes playing Your Song and, with a nostalgic tear in his eye, gently shuts the lid. But then he notices the cameraman in his peripheral vision and loses his temper, screaming profanities and flinging vases until the cameraman is forced to escape and flee for his life. Finally, the new slogan appears: “John Lewis. If we can deal with him, we can deal with you”.

Oh, wait! That was The Guardian’s finale and, to be fair, one that would have made for a better ending – not very Christmas-like is it?! I like the angle of a popular musicians recalling their memories and, by putting music right in the spotlight, a big risk has been taken. It is good to see a more emotional side to Elton John – rather than him having a diva strop – but it seems to be more about him than Christmas; the budget must have been huge and many have criticised the cost of the advert at a time when John Lewis is tightening its belt. Is it possible to get the music just right and keep the cost pretty low? Hiring a lesser-known artist to perform the song is a way to do that but it does not have the gravitas of a truly big name. If you do get these titans in the frame then you need to make sure what they are singing or what they are representing gets the balance right. Maybe it is impossible to strike that right chord (get it?!) and please everyone. Many people argue Christmas it too materialistic so one cannot really have an argument against the music of a Christmas advert – when we should be focusing on the message and purpose. The thing is, the Christmas adverts are representing organisations who feed (literally) this commercialism so, as such, if we are to buy into their campaigns then they need to consider and perfect every point.

ooo.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @sholt680/Unsplash

The latest crop of Christmas adverts ranges from ‘political’ and unique (Iceland) to the usual fare (Sainsbury’s) to something a little less music-focused (Tesco). John Lewis, as you’d expect, have drawn a lot of focus and, again, the high-cost retailer has incurred losses in the Christmas advert race. I wonder why it is so difficult for advertisers and these big stores to get the tone right and understand how impactful a great musical backing can be. We sing Christmas carols because they are timeless and pure; we love popular songs because they resonate and have that quality. It seems, in the hands of the advert makers, there is less beautiful chemistry than a messy sort of sludge. I am never going to be swayed to a supermarket/shop based on their Christmas campaign but I am likely to be a bit put off by a particularly sickly/atonal advert. Maybe I will come around to the Elton John-featuring John Lewis campaign or be less inclined to scowl when seeing the Sainsbury’s advert come on.  Maybe the solution is a lot simpler: mute the sound and, whilst watching the advert unfolds, play...

cccc.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @mariahashby/Unsplash

MY own musical accompaniment!

FEATURE: Still on Our Minds: Why Dido’s First Tour in Fifteen Years Is Creating a Buzz

FEATURE:

 

 

Still on Our Minds

dd.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: The cover for Dido’s upcoming fifth album, Still on My Mind/IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images 

Why Dido’s First Tour in Fifteen Years Is Creating a Buzz

__________

THERE are a lot of different reasons why Dido

dido.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

is making the music news at the moment. I have been a fan of her music since her debut, No Angel, back in 2001 and, back then, I was amazed by its breadth and appeal. (The album was actually released in the U.S. in 1999 but got a worldwide release in 2001). Many might have heard her through a slightly odd channel: her song, Thank You, was sampled by Eminem for Stan (the third single from his album, The Marshall Mathers LP, in 2000). No Angel is a remarkable story. It is the second-biggest-selling album of the 2000s (in the U.K.) behind James Blunt’s Back to Bedlam and is a bit of a phenomenon. The album has conquered countries and provided this complex yet accessible songwriter to the world. I like the name ‘Dido’ but it is the start of a very long and confusing set of names - ‘Dido Florian Cloud de Bounevialle O'Malley Armstrong’ is her full ‘title’. The fact she has a German boy’s name (Florian) in the pack led to bullying at school whereas ‘Dido’ on its own is a lot more focused and less confusing! I am not a massive-mega-superfan of Dido but I do like the fact you can easily listen to her music and get something from it. It is not something, too, one plays in the background. The music demands focus and attention and you can hear how every note means something to the songwriter.

No Angel spawned huge singles such as Here with Me and Thank You whilst Life for Rent (2003) gave us White Flag and Life for Rent. The charm and easy-going nature of her first two albums appealed to many and whilst there were musical snobs out there – saying there was no edge and it (the music) was aimed at the mainstream stations – the fans grew and her name got to new people. As Dido’s career progressed; the music, if anything, grew stronger and more rounded. 2008’s Safe Trip Home is more nuanced and has more mystery; the songs more consistent and, whilst there is that need for a bit more edge from the voice; the comfort and sense of revelation you get from each moment is fantastic. 2013’s Girl Who Got Away saw Dido step into new musical pastures and experiment. Split between London and California, Jeff Bhasker and Greg Kurstin were among the names that were part of the writing/production team. Although there were some detractors; I feel the album is stronger and more nuanced (a word one can easily apply to Dido) than her early work. There was a lot of affection for that album and, as has recently been announced, there will be another studio album coming. Still on My Mind will be released in March - and will be Dido’s first new record in six years.

Hurricanes, released a few days ago, is the lead single from the record but we do not know a lot else. Most of the material was written in England with her brother Rollo (Armstrong). Seeing as, before this album, Dido had been spending time in the U.S. and working with a team, it seems this is a more homely, focused and familial record – one suspects elements of No Angel and its themes might return. Dido says her love of Hip-Hop and Folk will come into the album and it will be interesting to see where she heads. If that seems like a whistle-stop tour of her music and life then you’ll forgive me. It is interesting she has an album coming out but there is one remarkable fact: the tour to promote Still on My Mind will be her first in fifteen years. Life for Rent was the last album she toured and, seeing as two records have come since then; it is interesting to hear of Dido’s return to the stage. Here are some details regarding her tour:

Multimillion-selling singer Dido has announced her first tour for 15 years.

The 27-date world tour begins in Prague on 5 May, reaches the UK on 26 May and then heads to the US.

Fans will hope to hear her perform some of her biggest hits, such as Thank You, Here With Me and White Flag, alongside music from her new studio album.

Titled Still On My Mind, it is her first album for five years. Written in the UK with her brother Rollo, it will be released on 8 March.

Dido's last studio album was 2013's Girl Who Got Away, which reached number five in the charts”.

6.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Dido in 2018/PHOTO CREDIT: BMG/Simon Emmett

Few would think anything of someone like Kate Bush not touring for that long – she has explained the reasons behind this – but it seemed a bit odd that Dido stopped touring – at least in the U.S. – for so long. Maybe family commitments and the need to unwind was part of that but it is refreshing to see she is back on the road. In an interview with Billboard; she explained the reasons behind her live return:

I spent a lot of time saying no to that question [of touring],” Dido tells Billboard, calling from New York the day after she previewed the album for the first time. “But as an artist and a songwriter, you start really missing being right in front of the people who listen to your music. It makes you a better writer and artist to actually engage with the people who listen to your music -- it’s all fundamental."

She says the songs on the upcoming album felt right to perform live, but that they won’t make up the entire set list. “I was making a list of songs we’d perform and thinking about the old songs and how much fun it’s going to be to play them again,” Dido reveal”.

Today, music is filled with that need for artists to get on the road. They will release a single/album like Dido is now and then, inevitably, there is that plan for touring. Sometimes, artists will be on the road for months and the only reason they stop is to begin work on a new record. I guess they need to get the music out there and respond to the demand but I wonder how they have the energy to keep going!

sss.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Dido in 2013/PHOTO CREDIT: Guy Aroch

Look at all these mainstream artists and they are being ferried around the world and touring all over the place. If there is any sort of gap or lack of dates then people start to ask why and there is that speculation. Some explain it is because of illness or family concerns but few feel they can detach from touring for years and only do so when they feel it is right. I guess Dido’s toured extensively until 2003 and she has been focused on albums and her family. Tickets are available for her upcoming tour and I know a lot of people who are keen to snap up these rare dates. I wonder whether it will signal a more regular return to the stage but I have been thinking of those who leave gaps between touring and whether more artists should follow suit. I feel many embark on lengthy tours because they feel they need to rather than wanting to. Many asked, after the peak of her popularity, what happened to Dido and why she was not touring. I feel there is that pressure for artists to keep plugging and play as many dates as possible. It is rare for a big artist to have that intense focus – as Dido did back at the start of her career – and then to be quiet on the gig front. Many are buying tickets so they can reconnect with her and she, in turn, feels being on stage is necessary now.

I feel other artists need to take example from Dido (maybe not fifteen years away!) and ease up on gigs. It may sound foolish to deny that demand and risk losing fans but I feel too many are touring too hard and that can do its own damage. In any case; Dido is coming back to the worldwide stage and, whatever you think of her music, it is an interesting move and big news that will please her existing fans but bring in new support! To see her on stage performing new material and splicing it with the classics is going to be a great show. Still on My Mind, it seems, has been a very easy and pleasurable recording experience – as she explained to Billboard regarding her writing/working with her brother:

Dido describes their working relationship as “having a brain that does everything.” The music they make together, she says, is a byproduct of them having a great time catching up on life and spending time with one another’s families. “Songs come [naturally] because you have ideas while you’re talking, and good music comes out of that sort of environment. We’re not trying too hard.”

Since her last album, 2013’s Girl Who Got Away, Dido has spent much of her time raising her now 7-year-old son, who she says is always introducing her to new music. She herself is big on SigridChristine and the Queens and Khalid (“He has one of my favorite voices I’ve heard recently”)”.

Many assumed Dido was through with touring and that her professional career would be releasing albums and working out of the studios. The songwriter is keen to get back on the stage and, after such a long time away, it is good news to see Dido...

didos.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

BRINGING her music directly to the people.

FEATURE: My Forty-Year-Old Squeeze: Looking Back at a Remarkable Band: The Ultimate Squeeze Playlist

FEATURE:

 

 

My Forty-Year-Old Squeeze

as.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: The single art for Cool for Cats (1979)/IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images 

Looking Back at a Remarkable Band: The Ultimate Squeeze Playlist

__________

MY first exposure to Squeeze would have been…

 IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

the incredible single, Cool for Cats. That song was taken from their sophomore album of the same name and marked a big leap for Chris Difford and Glenn Tilbrook. Although the band – in various incarnations – have been around for over forty years; the debut album, Squeeze, was unleashed in March 1978 and, a little late to the party, I wanted to look back at the band and the incredible work they have put out. I didn’t experience Cool for Cats until the late-1980s – the album it is from came out in 1979 – and marvelled, even at such a young age, at the wit and imagery being put forward. I was exposed to some great music as a youngster but there was nothing as witty and ‘human’ as Squeeze. Maybe it was the accent of Difford and the way he could bring this extraordinary and wild song to the ground and make it seem somewhat normal. Lyrics about corporals and violence; flashing cash and being, as the title/chorus goes, cool for cats – this was a new type of music and one that made a big impact. I grew up around a lot of Pop and mainstream music, so to have Squeeze muscling in and presenting something a bit different; this was a big deal and led me to look back at their debut.

77.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Glenn Tilbrook in 2018/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

The eponymous introduction was not a world-beater as such – there were problems and the album seems quite troubled and inconsistent – but did introduce this incredible band. John Cale produced everything except for Take Me I’m Yours and Bang Bang and, as Tilbrook explained some years later; it was a bit maddening working with a producer who threw out most of their songs and took a very different approach. Difford and Tilbrook wanted to be assertive and have their material resonate but they were in awe of this masterful songwriter and figure that was producing for them. As such, there were some fine moments but it was not until Cool for Cats that you got a more expressive and natural Squeeze sound. Up the Junction is a story of meeting a girl, falling in love and having a baby told through a very ordinary and, as such, unique lens. Our hero talks about the mundane aspects – paying bills and being responsible – and it is such a captivating and exceptional song. With Tilbrook’s exceptional ear for composition and feel and Difford’s incredible lyrics driving the songs; it was no surprise critics went made for Squeeze. This is how AllMusic views Cool for Cats:

“...Chief among those is "Up the Junction," a marvelous short story chronicling a doomed relationship, but there's also the sly kinky jokes married to deft characterizations on "Slap and Tickle," the heartbroken tale of "Goodbye Girl," and the daft surrealism of "Cool for Cats." These are subtle, sophisticated songs that are balanced by a lot of direct, unsophisticated songs, as Difford picks up on the sexually charged vibe of John Cale and gets even kinkier, throwing out songs about masturbation and cross-dressing, occasionally dipping into how he's feeling slightly drunk. Tilbrook pairs these ribald tales to frenzied rock & roll, equal parts big hooks and rollicking rhythms, including a couple of showcases for Holland's boogie-woogie piano. It's all a bit scattered but in a purposeful way, as the impish wit lends the pub rockers a kinky kick while Tilbrook's tunefulness gives it all an identity. Cool for Cats winds up being wild and weird, angular and odd in a way only a new wave album from 1979 could possibly be, but this is a high watermark for its era with the best moments effortless transcending its time”.

I have not yet mentioned Jools Holland: his distinct piano style and personality helped elevate the music and brought something fantastic to the band. Squeeze would continue this momentum and brilliance with 1980’s Argybargy. There are some underrated gems like Misadventure and There at the Top but it is those big hits that stand out. The masterful Another Nail in My Heart is a nervy breakup song that was critically acclaimed and talks of heavy drinking, lost love and, at the death, the piano man at the bar putting another nail into the heart of the hero. Pulling Mussels (from the Shell) is one of my favourite Squeeze songs – not least the incredible riffs and nuanced composition – and  talks of Difford’s observations of the working-class and him spending time, as a youngster, at holiday camps; all the basic accommodation, humble pleasures and rather unspectacular views. Squeeze’s regency and brilliant run would continue the following year with 1981’s East Side Story. It is a double-album with one half produced by Elvis Costello and another by Roger Bechirian. There were rumours Paul McCartney and Dave Edmunds produced sides of the record but that has not been substantiated. The fourteen-track record is a veritable feast of diamonds but, again, there are those two standout cuts. Tempted, released as a single on 10th July, 1981, was written by Chris Difford as he was taking a taxi to Heathrow Airport and was ruminating on a relationship that was falling apart due to his infidelities. Difford considers it one of the band’s best songs and a moment when they were maturing and coming into their own.

hh.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

Labelled with Love, peaking at number-four in the charts in 1981, shows that maturity and softer sound. The next few albums would see a slight dent in the critical stride – not as confident as their previous two – but 1982’s Sweets from a Stranger gave us Black Coffee in Bed; Cosi Fan Tutti Frutti (1985) spawned Last Time Forever and Hits of the Year whilst Babylon and On gave us Footprints. One of my early Squeeze memories is having Hourglass, the album’s opener, played in the car as a child. I was addicted to the fast-paced singalong of the chorus and the big brass working funkily throughout. It is a catchy song but not one that resonated with the critics. The song reached number-fifteen in the U.S. and was their biggest hit there. The song’s video, directed by Ade Edmondson, was played a load on MTV and gained them new popularity. If It’s Love and Love Circles made 1989’s Frank a more popular (among critics rather than fans) and complete album and showed, at the end of the 1980s, how much the band had changed. The core was still there – Difford and Tilbrook at the centre; Jools Holland was still part of the fray – but, whilst a solid album, Frank sold poorly and it meant Squeeze were released by A&M Records – they had not long been taken under their wing. The band signed with Reprise Records soon after and released the satisfying Play in 1991.

Maybe 1993’s Some Fantastic Place did not have the same calibre of hits as their work in the late-1970s and 1980s but there was that incredible songcraft and, at this stage, another change for the band. Reprise Records dropped Squeeze when Play did not fare too well and they were resigned by A&M Records for Some Fantastic Place. Drummer Gilson Lavis left the band and Paul Carrack returned to the group. He has worked with them on East Side Story – he played keyboard and sung the lead on Tempted – and the reconnection worked out brilliantly.  Whilst there have been mixed fortunes regarding their ‘recent’ output (1998-) – 1998’s Domino was rushed and negatively reviewed; 2010’s Spot the Difference is a mix of new and old Squeeze songs; 2015’s Cradle to the Grave marked a new lease and was received very well – it is great to see the band are still going and, who knows, maybe there will be new material next year. Here is a sample review for Cradle to the Grave:

Neither Tilbrook nor his co-songsmith Chris Difford envisaged Squeeze would reform for a third term, yet, after a successful 2007 reunion and 2010’s Spot The Difference (a collection of reworked older songs), they’ve finally fashioned an all-new studio LP, From The Cradle To The Grave.

Most of the tracks are scheduled to feature in the forthcoming Danny Baker/Jeff Pope-penned BBC sitcom of the same name (which has been adapted from Baker’s autobiography, Going To Sea In A Sieve), but From The Cradle… also reveals itself to be an accomplished comeback in its own right – not to mention Squeeze’s most essential set since 1993’s Some Fantastic Place.

With its best songs vividly referencing the 70s South London landscape of Difford and Tilbrook’s youth, FTCTTG is frequently nostalgic, yet it’s largely upbeat and mostly eminently radio-friendly. The balmy, country-flavoured Happy Days and stomping, soul-tinged titular song are surely destined to become live favourites, while affecting teenage rites of passage tales such as Honeytrap and the brilliant, porn-mag-related Haywire eloquently demonstrate why Difford still hits the spots lesser lyricists can’t reach”.

ch.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Chris Difford/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Squeeze followed up Cradle to the Grave pretty quickly with 2017’s The Knowledge. It saw Yolanda Charles replace Lucy Shaw on bass but, essentially, it is another tight and memorable Squeeze album. I am sure there will be other albums very soon but I am amazed the band have survived through the decades – considering they have been dripped by labels and personal problems threatened to split the band at very points – and are looking ahead. To me, Tilbook and Difford are one of the most underrated songwriting partnerships ever and can rank alongside the very best. Like Paul Heaton (lyrics) and Dave Rotheray (music) of The Beautiful South; there is that humour and sparkling wit but, at the core, kitchen sink drama and subjects we can all relate to. This interview from last year featured Glenn Tilbrook as he spoke about influences and songwriting comparisons:

As a musician, Tilbrook has influenced many new bands, but his influences were many.

“I grew up loving music. I had an older brother who used to buy records by The Beatles, The Who, The Stones and The Kinks and they had a big influence on me, the music of the 60s is just embedded in me.”
With their songwriting, Difford and Tilbrook became known as ‘the Lennon and McCartney of New Wave’, but this had an adverse affect on them. “I think it went to both our heads but we soon drifted back to earth
”.

I recall discovering Squeeze and being amazed by this very new and fresh band that sounded like no other. The chemistry between Tilbrook and Difford has sustained them and, although there were break-ups – the first in 1982; they reformed in 1985 and disbanded again in 1999 – there is that love and mutual respect. Maybe the comparisons to Lennon and McCartney at their peak (around the late-1970s and early-1980s) was hyperbole but you cannot argue against the brilliance of their songwriting. It is forty years since their eponymous debut and there have been definite highs and lows. The classic tracks speak for themselves. There are few groups who can boast songs as memorable and uplifting as Cool for Cats, Up the Junction and Black Coffee in Bed. Long may the fortunes of Squeeze continue but I was interested featuring them because of that longevity and survival. Maybe there as a distinct golden period for the band (their second album through to the middle of the 1980s) but, at every stage, there have been these incredible moments and developments. At a time when music has lost its fun, humour and beguile; I listen back to Squeeze and wonder whether they can provide modern guidance. There are artists talking of real life but you still get a lot of misery, anger and, for the most part, lack of spark. I feel those classic and unique bands have disappeared – Squeeze, in many ways, cannot be repeated and were from a very different time. Their incredible back catalogue needs to be heard and discovered by the new generation and taken to heart. The band might have made their mark a long time ago but I feel their influence and brilliance can...

00.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Squeeze as they are today/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images/Press

INSPIRE many musicians today…

FEATURE: New Year’s Resolution: YouTube’s 'Ones to Watch'

FEATURE:

 

 

New Year’s Resolution

yy.png

IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images/YouTube/ALL OTHERS IMAGES/PHOTOS (unless credited otherwise): Getty Images

YouTube’s ‘Ones to Watch’

__________

IT is always interesting looking at the top-ten lists…

888.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @christianw/Getty Images

and what people are recommending for each new year. I am keeping my eyes open for the New Year’s ‘honours’ as it were and those who have been promoted and augmented to special heights. We will get the traditional ‘ones to watch’ features coming out from sort of now through to January and it will be good to see what makes the cut. I have just seen the announcement YouTube have made regarding their tips and who we should be watching. This is a special announcement as it is the first time the site has tipped artists. I will bring you an introduction to each of the ten but, at a time when the site is having some issues – laws brewing regarding payment of artists and copyright – and their fortunes are not certain. YouTube will continue to flourish but it remains to be seen whether what will happen next year. I am pumped to see what comes out and how YouTube will develop. In any case; looking at their ‘ones to watch’ news is quite exciting. Here’s what has come out:

YouTube has revealed the top 10 artists it expects will hit the big time next year - and the majority are British.

Singer Mahalia tops its first ever Ones To Watch list - which predicts which acts will become huge stars in 2019.

Rapper Kojey Radical, singer-songwriter Samm Henshaw and guitarist and singer Jade Bird also feature.

YouTube looked at the artists' video views, number and subscribers and the time spent watching their videos to come to its decision... 

Organisations like the BBC, the Brits and Spotify are among those who annually publish lists of hot prospects - but this is the first time YouTube has made the move.

Mahalia, 19, described being ranked number one on the list as a "special moment for me".

She said: "This recognition means so much."

The Leicestershire-born singer revealed she wrote her first song aged eight and used the streaming site to help her with her music.

PHOTO CREDIT: @makuph/Unsplash 

The singer said: "I basically learnt how to play so much of what I know on the guitar from watching people on YouTube.

"The platform has helped me grow and build a real, personal fan base in the UK and around the world while never compromising my creativity."

She signed her first major record deal aged 13 and is expected to release her debut album later this year.

The singer has more than 106,000 subscribers and her most popular video for a song called Sober has been viewed more than 20 million times.

Singer-songwriter Sam Fender said he was "super excited" about 2019 after finding out his name was on the list.

He said: "I started recording music in a garden shed not so long ago. So it's incredible to now be recognised and heard at a global scale.

"I'm super excited for next year, there's so much more to come."

The 22-year-old who is from North Shields was widely praised for his song Dead Boys which was about mental health.

He recently signed to Polydor Records and is expected release his first EP at the end of November”.

It is good to see this come out and I will have a look at the artists next year and see how they rise. Before then, and as a brief introduction, here is a little bit about the selected ten, links to their music and sample videos from YouTube:

Mahalia

ma.jpg

Official Site: http://mahaliamusic.co.uk/

Follow: https://twitter.com/mahalia

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/mahaliamusic

Latest Video: One Night Only (with Kojey Radical)                    

Sample Cuts:

Mahalia grew up roughly a hundred miles from London in a quiet section of Leicester. While her town lacked the well-known clubs and trendsetting music scenes of the big city, Mahalia’s dream of being heard by the world was never deterred by her geography.

“I think I might have an advantage being from Leicester because I don’t know all the cool people in London,” she tells VIBE with a laugh. “The thing about the U.K. is that underground music always takes over. It’s not just about the radio.”

The 19-year old started penning songs at an early age, with encouragement from her musical family, and she always carried a passion for the creative arts. Mahalia’s music is wise beyond her years and some. It’s getting harder to find R&B songs from ’90s born artists that don’t include an overabundance of Instagram references and chatter about designer clothes, but this profound voice is hellbent on keeping her songs clutter-free.

“It’s something in the water, I think,” says the Atlantic Records signee about the U.K.’s overwhelming talent pool. “I just want to make Leicester proud of me, there’s so much music from here and I just want to represent where I’m from” – VIBE (October 2017)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 107k

Biggest Video: Sober – A COLORS SHOW

Octavian

oo.jpg

Sample Cuts:

We’ve been here six months,” Octavian explains as we take the lift up to his home after the shoot. “The flat we were in before this, now that was mad. It was massive: it had a pool table and all these LED lights everywhere. That was the place everyone would come to party.” I ask why he left. “We got kicked out for partying,” he says matter-of-factly.

Moving house no longer fazes him. Born in Lille in north-east France, Octavian moved to south London with his mother when he was three, but their relationship became strained. When he was a teenager, she sent him back to France to live with his uncle. They fought a lot, often physically, and after two years he was sent back to his mother. Knowing he wanted to pursue music, Octavian landed a scholarship to the Brit school – previously attended by Adele and Amy Winehouse – but soon grew disillusioned. “There were literally people doing backflips and singing harmonies in the corridors … it was not my type of thing,” he says. “I just don’t believe that you can teach someone how to be creative. As soon as you start teaching someone, they lose their originality” – The Guardian (September 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 10k

Biggest Video: Party Here (VIEWS)

Grace Carter

g.jpg

Sample Cuts:

What do you try to do with your music and how do you achieve this?
Grace: "Every song I write is about the life I've lived and I'm definitely trying to tell a story but something that's very important to me with what I do is that anyone and everyone can relate to the lyrics I write. Although they have such deep and personal meanings to me, I want other people to be able to put their lives on to my words. Not everyone has the ability to put their emotions in to words and I think that's what makes songwriting/music so powerful."

Can you tell us what musical and non-musical influences have shaped your sound?
Grace: "My childhood has been very inspirational to me, I grew up with a single mum and at 13 she met my stepdad who was a songwriter. I discovered songwriting through him which allowed me to find a release for a lot of pent-up anger I had carried through my childhood. I also found a lot of inspiration from strong female artists, growing up I listened to artists like Nina Simone, Alicia Keys, and Lauryn Hill. They're all true artists whose songs are full of emotion and honesty and that's something I always want to achieve in my songwriting
” – The Line of Best Fit (January 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 37k

First Video: Ashes

Kojey Radical

kk.jpg

Sample Cuts:

We are all born with superpowers, says Kojey Radical. Whether we choose to use them or not is up to us. “Being a creative isn’t about limiting yourself to one medium,” he says, husky of voice and smooth of dress — black military beret, cropped black trousers, a solid gold bumblebee on a chain around his neck — in an east London members’ club.

“If you’re an artist you’re an artist.” He shrugs his rangy shoulders. “Doesn’t matter in what capacity you make art.”

Born and raised in pre-hipster Hoxton, where he still lives, close to his family, 25-year-old Radical is prismatic, determinedly woke, a real Renaissance man from the ends. He’s a spoken word-poet and rapper, a dancer, model, illustrator and video artist. He’s the creative director of London men’s fashion label Chelsea Bravo and founder/director of media collective Pushcrayons.

He’s an inspiration, too, to many young people in his area. Impressed by the chauffeur-driven cars that arrive to take him to airports (he’s toured Australia, Brazil, South Africa), photoshoots (he’s worked on campaigns for Adidas, Apple, Dr Marten) or the Eurostar for Paris Fashion Week (where he hung out with mates including Moses Boyd and Reggie Yates), they listen when he talks about the role of community” – Evening Standard (July 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 12k

Biggest Video: Footsteps

Sam Fender

sssa.jpg

Sample Cuts:

“With the cash from his record deal, signed four months ago after a bidding war, and an inevitable sponsorship deal with Fender guitars, he’s been able to set up his own recording studio back home. “If this all goes wrong I can stay in music and use that studio to do endless amounts of work.”

He doesn’t need to worry about things going wrong just yet anyway. His year began with a place on the longlist for the BBC’s Sound of 2018 poll when he had only made four songs public. Heavy gigging, including support slots with George Ezra and Catfish and the Bottlemen, has taken him up to this month, when he’ll release his debut EP, also called Dead Boys. He’s just sold out three nights on the trot at south London’s 320-capacity Omeara venue and announced a new show for 1,700 at Electric Brixton for February.

“It’s getting bigger, which is exciting and terrifying in equal measure,” he says. Asked what he was hoping for when he first started playing in bands at the age of 16, he replies: “Somewhere along the lines of what’s going on now — the ability to live a life doing this as my sole job, which I now do” – Evening Standard (November 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 8.5k

Biggest Video: Play God

slowthai

ss.jpg

Sample Cuts:

“Though slowthai's descriptive raps tell stories and paint pictures straight from his brain, his music videos are also a big sell, breathing new visual life into his tunes. Take the video for "Ladies", a track from his first EP (watch below), in which there is a scene where he lies naked and curled up next to his fully-clothed girlfriend. The image is powerful in its rarity in pop culture alone, but it is also a reference to the iconic Annie Leibowitz photo of John Lennon and Yoko Ono taken in the last 15 hours of his life before he was shot. Then there's “North Nights”, an altogether different experience, made up of references to slowthai’s favourite horror films: The Shining, Blair Witch, A Clockwork Orange and La Haine. “I don't know if it's my attention span”, he laughs, touching on his meticulously thought-out music videos, “but I don't like reading. I'm more of a visual person” – NOISEY (September 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 33k

Biggest Video: T N Biscuits

L Devine

l.jpg

Sample Cuts:

KEY TRACK: Nervous
LABEL: Warner Bros
MANAGEMENT: Major Influence
TWITTER: @LDevineMusic

WHO: Twenty-one-year-old newcomer Olivia Devine, who goes by L Devine to avoid confusion with a porn star who shares her name.

WHAT: Pop, pure and simple. L Devine is signed to Warner Bros, who will no doubt be seeking to propel the Whitley Bay-born singer to Dua Lipa levels of stratospheric importance.

WHERE: Devine was born in the North East but moved to London to follow her musical dream.

A DEVINE INTERVENTION?
Good one. And yes, L Devine has 2019 in her sights. She released the Growing Pains EP a year ago, and the Peer Pressure mixtape and film is out this week. Recent track Nervous, complete with a sleek, LA-filmed video by Emil Nava, laid down an impressive marker.

WHAT ELSE DO I NEED TO KNOW?
Devine originally wanted to be a songwriter, and has been honing her craft for a few years now. Sessions with a cast including John Hill (MIA, Rihanna) and Ian Kirkpatrick (Dua Lipa) have shaped a powerful, relatable sound.

WATCH OUT, THEN?
Start the Devine-al countdown!
” - Music Week (November 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 6.4k

Biggest Video: Love You Like That

Dermot Kennedy

fd.jpg

Sample Cuts:

“Now he has the best of both worlds, with a devoted core fanbase and big business backing that opens the kind of doors a boy from the tiny village of Rathcoole, with a population of fewer than 4,500, could only have dreamed of. Kennedy, who is best described as a folksy, alternative artist with a taste for heavy hip hop beats – check out “Moments Passed” – recently worked with Mike Dean, the American super-producer who’s notched up credits with everyone from Jay-Z to Kanye West. “Seeing that Mike and the other younger, serious hip hop guys in the studio were into my songs was really exciting,” he says. “Travis Scott was there on Facetime and he was listening to it as well.”

With A-list endorsement, a current single “Power Over Me” already on 1.5m plays, a headline show at Brixton Academy – the holy grail of venues for young artists – just announced and an album due next year, you could assume Kennedy would be getting just a little bit cocky. And he well might, if it wasn’t for his friends, the same ones he played sports with at school. “They are huge for me in terms of keeping my head screwed on,” he says. “I could win a Grammy and they would take the piss out of what I was wearing. They will slag you off about anything, no matter what happens”- GQ (October 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 48k

Biggest Video: An Evening I Will Not Forget

Samm Henshaw

saaa.jpg

Sample Cuts:

How did you get into music? Any tips for budding musicians?

I started playing in church from a child growing up and kept going at it until I was good enough to write my own songs. I would say work hard on your craft and never stop learning.

What do you most value in your wardrobe?

My hats, without them I’m not sure…

What’s your favourite piece from the outfits which you wore for this shoot?

I really liked the grey shirt or the jacket, really simple but a good mix of materials”- The Idle Man (2015)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 43k

Biggest Video: Broke

Jade Bird

ll.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Phoebe Fox

Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/JadeBirdMusic/

Official Website: http://www.jade-bird.com/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6sRi0TuAnixUvUbhuj9YNg

Latest Video: Love Has All Been Done Before

Sample Cuts:

Jade Bird can do an impeccable American accent, and with good reason: The British singer-songwriter has spent plenty of time in the States recently, including playing her first American festival, Stagecoach 2018. However, although she grew up listening to American music, Bird tells The Boot none of this means she's trying to move away from her British roots.

"It's not like I'm intentionally saying, 'Oh, anyhow, now I'm going to make American music,'" the singer explains. "I just always really loved music that was coincidentally from the States."

Bird had long admired songwriters such as Bob Dylan, but it wasn't until she heard the Civil Wars that the 20-year-old musician started deep-diving into American music.

"That was the first time I'd ever seen somebody who reminded me of me playing the guitar, first off," Bird says. "I love the band for that. The chemistry between them just felt so true and not put on, and to me, that is so important”- The Boot (May 2018)

Total YouTube Subscribers (at time of this feature): 23k

Biggest Video: Lottery

FEATURE: Better Living Through Chemistry: World Kindness Day: Bringing Some Positivity Back into Music

FEATURE:

 

 

Better Living Through Chemistry

m.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @juanparodriguez/Unsplash 

World Kindness Day: Bringing Some Positivity Back into Music

__________

MAYBE I am misremembering the past…

@seteales.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @seteales/Unsplash

but I swear I lived through a time when there was a lot more positivity in the music industry! Maybe my 1990s-rose-tinted-glasses are getting steamed up in the hot tub of misty nostalgia but, more and more, there is a lot of negative energy swirling around music. That makes me sound like a hippie but I wonder how much of us take the time to contact an artist and tell them their work is great. Not motivated by anything or in exchange for kindness – just for the sake of making them feel better and giving them recognition. I get caught up in the endless blizzard of emails and the rather robotic process of replying to people and stamping out interviews like a machine. It is what needs to be done I guess – cutting back a lot would be great but hard to do – and it can be quite soulless having to go through this daily routine and, at the end, not getting a huge amount of satisfaction. The songs that I consider are great but, when bombarded with dozens each week; they are not staying in the mind and, when I am through with that artist; it is onto the next one and so on and so on! My wish for next year is to transition away from the written interview and start focusing on bigger artists.

mm.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @rawpixel/Unsplash

I will still keep in with the upcoming acts but I have been working tirelessly for seven years and have got as much as I can from what I am doing. One of the worst effects of the daily routine is the time I get to properly appreciate music and acknowledge artists. I think we all get into this trap. It is World Kindness Day and, to many, it might sound like a corny and forced day to, for one day only, be nicer and show a bit more warmth. Rather than being a cynical and Hallmark-inspired day of kindness; it is a chance for us to be more aware of a lack of positivity and togetherness. It seems harder and harder to be kind and communicative at a time when most of us are lost in a sea of work, demands and pressures. It might be impossible to extol the virtues of kindness to random strangers in the street but, in music; I wonder whether more could be done. I hear from artists who are largely ignored and feel buried in a digital world. People might stream their song and there is that lack of communication – what do they think and what do they like about the song. I often review and interview and, after all is done, nothing else is said. Maybe I am doing my fair share but many people feel, as technology rules our tastes and practices, there is less community, feedback and positivity.

99.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Tempest/PHOTO CREDIT: David Levene/eyevine/Redux

Last year, around the time of the Mercury Prize; Kate Tempest was interviewed about music and made a very good point, when interviewed by NME, regarding its (music’s) impact on negative forces:

As creators of music and literatures, it’s our role to examine even the most confusing moments and try to make sense of how it feels to be a live and in this particular moment,” Tempest told NME. “I think enough has been said about the dystopian nightmare, but in my experience of touring this album, what’s happened is extremely positive actually. What seems to be happening when we talk about some of these things, like ‘Europe Is Lost’ or ‘Tunnel Vision’, there is this flood of positivity that’s been happening.

“That feels like an amazing thing to be contributing right now. To be able to stand in a room full of people and leave them with these words about love. It’s nothing new, it’s been said since the dawn of time. It’s kind of poignant, but right now when I feel like there’s so much panic, [it feels good] to be coming together in big rooms of people and feeling it all”.

We often take music for granted: that commodity that is available on-tap and is this inalienable right. Not only do a lot of us stream music for free – meaning artists do not get money- but we do not post back to that person and express what their music does and how it makes them feel. The more we rely on machines to communicate, the more blasé and entitled we are, I think.

b.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @rawpixel/Unsplash

Maybe sites like Spotify and YouTube should enable some sort of portal/way of better connecting the listeners with the artists. It would be interesting to see the demographic of people streaming a song but, more than that, allow some feedback and kindness, verbal or written, for that artist. I feel a reason why music is becoming more negative, inward and losing its fun is because of how we all go about our way and a rather causal relationship between musician-fan. I often feel bad when I stream a song or listen to and do nothing else. I realise I am entitled to listen to it and do what I want but what of the person/people who created it? Maybe the huge choice and variation means it would be impractical to give opinions and offer some praise and, of course, there are those who will be negative and troll artists. I have been thinking about the nature of positive emotion and kindness in music and can see that vacuum. Social media allows us to connect with an artist and give that opinion but how many of us do that? Maybe it would be ridiculous if we did the same with an actor like Tom Cruise and fans inundated him with Tweets expressing their love of his latest film but so many musicians are putting work out into the world and appreciation comes in the form of ‘likes’, thumbs-up symbols and something that lacks any personalisation.

77.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @joshhild/Unsplash

Perhaps this raises questions around the nature of online comments/sites and whether symbols are a constructive and useful way of providing feedback. Validation and positivity are great ways to promote good music and lead to a more uplifted and inspiring scene. If we have new and established artists getting that reaction and loving buzz then that, in turn, will elevate their creative minds and souls and we might get a more overt and outward music scene – bringing the fun back and leading to something genuinely progressive. As it is; we are in this rather odd state where music lacks a spark and the sort of fun there used to be. There are more compelling reasons behind this change but I wonder whether the lack of connectivity and feedback is leaving them a bit hollow. I would like to see social media become more social. It would not be too hard for someone like me to type a comment or sentiment on a page/site after hearing a song – expressing my love of a track and giving them some lift. Maybe just a comment out of the blue or an unsolicited bit of praise. How often do we think like this and follow through?! I know I like getting this sort of thing and it would benefit music no end were more people to change their mindsets and put some love out there. World Kindness Day will be but a memory this time tomorrow but, if we can learn something from today and translate that into the music world; I feel these small gestures could make...

uu.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @arstyy/Unsplash

A big difference!   

FEATURE: California’s Dreamin'? The Chaos and Horror of the Wildfires and Mass Shooting and the Effect on the Californian Music Community

FEATURE:

 

 

California’s Dreamin'?

to.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Santa Monica, California/PHOTO CREDIT: @rutgerg_sink_sink_sink_sink_sink  

The Chaos and Horror of the Wildfires and Mass Shooting and the Effect on the Californian Music Community

__________

NATURAL disasters and climate-related destruction…

cc.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Part of a staircase stands amid the remains of a home that was one of thousands destroyed by the Camp Fire in Paradise, Calif., north of Sacramento; 8th Nov., 2018/PHOTO CREDIT: Josh Edelson/AFP/Getty Images

is becoming more common and, as the temperature rises; certain areas of the world are vulnerable to wildfires and needless destruction. You have to wonder whether President Donald Trump will do anything to redress the issues in California and the loss that has been incurred. He seems pretty unmoved when it comes to climate change and is one of those people who assume everything is fine and nothing needs to be done. You can hardly avoid the news and the terrible details we are hearing about California. The BBC has given an update regarding death toll and the latest news:

The death toll in wildfires sweeping California has risen to 31, with more than 200 people still missing, officials have said.

Six more people were confirmed killed in the Camp Fire in the north of the state, taking the toll there to 29.

That fire now equals the deadliest on record in California - the 1933 Griffith Park disaster in Los Angeles.

In the south, the Woolsey Fire has claimed two lives as it damaged beach resorts including Malibu.

An estimated 250,000 people have been forced to flee their homes to avoid three major blazes in the state.

With strengthening winds threatening to spread the flames, California Governor Jerry Brown has urged President Donald Trump to declare a major disaster, a move that would harness more federal emergency funds...

 

The appeal came a day after Mr Trump threatened to cut funding for California, blaming the fires on poor forest management.

Harold Schaitberger, president of the International Association of Fire Fighters, called the president's comments "reckless and insulting".

California is one of the world’s biggest economies – bigger than the U.K. – and to hear about such loss and suffering there is horrible. One can only imagine the distress felt by those seeing their homes go up and losing everything they own. Although a small gesture; Kim Kardashian-West has ‘dedicated’ an award to the brave firefighters:

Kim Kardashian-West has dedicated an award win to the emergency services dealing with wildfires and a mass shooting in California.

Accepting the award for best reality TV series at the E! People's Choice Awards, she said: "We truly appreciate what you've done for all of us."

She's one of several celebrities who have had to flee their homes as wildfires spread across the state.

A gunman also killed 12 people at a bar in Thousand Oaks on Wednesday.

Speaking at the award ceremony on Sunday, Kim said: "Our country is stronger when we come together and we cannot face devastation alone.

"We must continue to reach out and help each other in these trying times".

There are two California-based ‘events’ I want to look at but the unending and horrific wildfires that are sweeping through the state and destroying homes and lives is something that is affecting the music community. I am sad every time a musician is affected by bad weather here. Whether it is flooding or strong winds; you hear about big bands and artists having their studios destroyed and losing so much. In California, I am reading reports of studios and homes being devastated.

nn.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Neil Young performs at Festival d'ete de Quebec on 6th July, 2018 in Quebec City, Canada/PHOTO CREDIT: Scott Legato/Getty Images

There are a lot of less-known, local musicians whose homes and studios have been impacted but Neil Young has spoken about his loss. This article looks at the loss incurred and how it is affecting some of the California-based musicians:

Neil Young has criticised Donald Trump for his reluctance to act on climate change after California wildfires destroyed the songwriter’s home.

In a tweet posted on 10 November, the US president blamed California’s “gross mismanagement of the forests” for the damage caused by the wildfires in northern and southern California. He implied that federal funding would be withdrawn if the situation was not rectified.

In a post on his website, Young responded: “California is vulnerable – not because of poor forest management as DT (our so-called president) would have us think. We are vulnerable because of climate change; the extreme weather events and our extended drought is part of it.”

Young is among a number of stars known to have been affected by the wildfires. David Bowie’s long-term pianist Mike Garson tweeted on Saturdayabout losing his home and studio. Actor Gerard Butler posted a photograph of his charred home and thanked firefighters for their “courage, spirit and sacrifice”. Miley Cyrus said that she lost her home but escaped with her fiancé, the actor Liam Hemsworth, and their animals.

Lady Gaga tweeted that she had been evacuated from her residence. “I’m sitting here with many of you wondering if my home will burst into flames.”

Katy Perry and Rod Stewart also criticised Trump over his tweets. “This is an absolutely heartless response,” Perry tweetedStewart said: “California needs words of support & encouragement, not threats or finger pointing & accusations”.

 

I know natural disasters impact all parts of America but the fact California has suffered such loss and houses such a wide and important music community makes me fearful of the future. Trump might be in the White House for another six years – horrifying to think! – and you wonder whether he will ever budge when it comes to climate control. He is in the dark and is blissfully unaware of the realities that face the world. Look at all the important culture that comes from California and realise how vulnerable it is. The full death toll will not be known until the fires are extinguished and one cannot truly say how much physical loss there will be regarding homes and businesses. The fact that some big-name musicians have been impacted is bad enough but there are many more, who will not make the news, who will have to rebuild their studios and homes and start again. Every right-minded person knows about global warming and how climate change is affecting the planet and for a nation to be run by someone so ignorant is terrifying and doing untold damage. Who knows how many other wildfires will ravage California and what damage that will do?! Another horror that has impacted the U.S. state is the gun massacre that occurred recently.  A few days ago, we had to hear the news of yet another mass shooting in America.

The BBC provided news as it unfolded:

A US Marine Corps veteran with suspected mental health issues killed 12 people in a busy bar in California, including a policeman, officials say.

The shooting began at 23:20 local time on Wednesday in Thousand Oaks about 40 miles (65km) north-west of Los Angeles.

At least 200 people were reportedly inside the Borderline Bar and Grill, which was hosting a student line-dancing night.

Police named the suspect as 28-year-old Ian David Long.

Earlier this year, police mental health professionals cleared him after he was found behaving "irrationally" at his home, said authorities.

One survivor said he and his friends also escaped death last year in the deadliest US mass shooting of modern times, when a gunman killed 58 people at a Las Vegas country music concert.

Nicholas Champion told CBS News: "We're all a big family and unfortunately this family got hit twice."

Popular among students, the bar is close to California Lutheran University, Pepperdine University and Moorpark College”.

Although the shooting happened at a line dancing event; a lot of Country music fans attended the bar and some, as you can see, survived the horrific shooting in Las Vegas. Like climate change and the effect it is having on California/the U.S.; many are calling for stricter gun control and new laws. Whereas there has been a physical loss – property etc. – with regards the wildfires; the killings at Borderline was an attack on music fans in a very popular and populated part of California. I was angered when writing about the murders in Las Vegas last year and felt that, given the loss of life, how can someone like Trump stay still and ignore the massive issue in the country?!

You can guarantee there will be more wildfires and there will be more mass shootings. One suspects we have not, sadly, heard the last of attacks against the music community and the huge loss being suffered by many in California right now. An economy and state as big as California, one would feel, would be more secure than other parts of America. The fact that many could have seen these wildfires coming is a result of a lack of empathy and understanding from the President. The massacre that claimed so many lives a few days ago, again, is a problem that can be traced to Trump and his ineffectiveness. It seems gun laws are stricter and more regulated in other parts of America:

California law designed to help police or family members keep guns out of the hands of at-risk individuals might have stopped the shooter who killed 12 people at a country and western bar.

After a mass shooting four years ago, the state passed a new law where courts could be asked to temporarily bar an at-risk person from owning guns.

The massacre in Thousand Oaks, California, has troubling parallels to the 2014 shooting, experts said, highlighting the fact that California’s three-year-old “gun violence restraining order” law is still rarely used.

Passed in the wake of the 2014 Isla Vista shooting, the new law was designed to close gaps in existing laws on mental health and violence – gaps that had allowed the Isla Vista shooter, Elliot Rodger, to legally own guns, despite a history of disturbing behavior that had alarmed his family and prompted a welfare check from law enforcement.

“There are a lot of law enforcement officers in this state who have never heard of the gun violence restraining order,” said Allison Anderman, the managing attorney at the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, who is working to improve implementation of the law.

“There’s nothing at the state level that I’m aware of that requires officers to be trained in this law”.

Maybe, you say, ordinary folk have suffered more than the music community regarding these two events – and you’d be right in many ways. I am not suggesting the lives of musicians are more important than anyone else’s but I can see how the shootings and wildfires have affected the community; from some world-famous artists to less-known musicians; it has been a hellacious and devastating last week or two. Whilst there has been some very visible and notable damage done to the musical community in California; one wonders what comes next and what the next step is going to be. One suspects there will be a benefit or fundraising concert and I suspect big artists like Neil Young and Katy Perry will contribute. I am sure Neil Young will write a song about the events – when he can get into a new studio/home – and the music community will react with anger. Fundraising and raising awareness is a good step and it will help spread messages to the world. We all know about climate change and gun massacres in the U.S. but recent occurrences, again, have raised calls for greater action regarding climate change laws and stricter gun control. Other parts of America’s music community are affected by climate and gun concerns but California is completely opposed to Trump and what he stands for. If California’s musicians and music locations want to avoid needless loss and devastation then is succeeding the answer?! The New Statesman gives some more details:

The concept of “Calexit”, or “Wexit” if joined by other progressive western states such as Washington and Oregon, has existed for years, drawing inspiration from fellow independence movements in Scotland and Catalonia. But it was in the wake of Donald Trump’s election as US president that the campaign truly gained traction. On issues such as immigration and free trade, Trump’s politics are diametrically opposed to those of California...

mmm.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Malibu, California/PHOTO CREDIT: @xangriffin

Evans was in Sacramento, the state capital, the day after Trump’s victory in November 2016. “People were just walking around the streets and crying,” he recalled. “It was weird. I’ve never seen that before. People just crying uncontrollably everywhere you went.”

Yes California’s membership increased by 400 per cent after election day. The organisation’s mailing list now has 98,000 subscribers; its Facebook page has 42,000 members, which, Evans pointed out, is only a few thousand less than the page for the California Democratic Party. In January 2017, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed support for state independence had risen from 20 per cent to 32 per cent; a Stanford University poll the same month found that 36 per cent of 18- t0 29-year-old Californians were in favour of secession, with a further 23 per cent undecided.

The notion of an independent California is far from absurd. The state’s Democratic governor Jerry Brown views “the sixth-largest economy of the world as capable of playing more of a nation state-like role”, his biographer, Orville Schell, told Politico last year.

In May, California surpassed the UK to become the world’s fifth-largest economy with a gross state product (the equivalent of GDP) of $2.747trn. Crucially, it is also a net contributor to the US federal budget: it receives considerably less ($356bn) than it pays in ($369bn). The state’s population of 39.54 million makes it larger than Poland”.

The music coming from has always been vital and I fear the long-term effects of Trump’s naivety and ineffectiveness will mean we’ll see more natural disaster, shootings and who knows what. The state is a huge economy and power in its own right but, essentially, still has to live in Trump’s America. You might say that California separating itself from the rest of America is extreme but we can see the devastation unfolding and how recent events have happened so easily. If California could be its own entity then I feel it could mean gun laws coming in and fast and effective climate control regulations. I am not sure what the government there would have in mind but it would mean having some sort of say and independence. Whilst it would be a good and smart move for the citizens; I feel the music community could also benefit. If we could avoid the sort of tragedy felt the last week then that would be a good thing. The state is vulnerable and I feel something needs to be done. As I said; who knows what could happen next regarding another tragedy. There is a fear and sense of unease in California and the fact Trump’s blind consciousness and general buffoonery is leading to needless loss of life is good enough reason to talk about the state becoming independent. I am not sure whether it will ever be realised but many, not only in the music world, would like to see it happen. The Golden State has a glorious music scene and so many artists we all rely on and, under Trump; there is this tarnishing and general unhappiness that need to be combated. If California rebelling against Trump and separating themselves from the U.S. prevents devastation and huge loss of life then I am all for it. The music community is being hit hard and effected in different ways and it is very clear...

j.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Flames from a wildfire burn a portion of Griffith Park in Los Angeles, California; 9th November, 2018/PHOTO CREDIT: ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images

SOMETHING needs to be done!   

FEATURE: Ending the Decade in Style: Part V/V: The Finest Albums of 1969

FEATURE:

 

 

Ending the Decade in Style

88.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @trommelkopf/Unsplash  

Part V/V: The Finest Albums of 1969

__________

THE reason I want to put together a new feature…

000.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @romankraft/Unsplash

is to shine a light on the albums that end a decade with a huge bang. I feel it is hard to define what a decade is about and how it evolves but the first and last years are crucial. Entering a decade with a big album is a great way to stand out and, similarly, ending it with something stunning is vital. It can be hard leaving a brilliant and bountiful decade of music but I wanted to shine a light on the artists who brought out albums that did justice; gave hope the next decade would be full, exciting and brilliant. I will do a five-part series about albums that opened a decade with panache but, right now, the fifth in a five-part feature that collates the best decade-enders from the 1960s, 1970s; 1980s, 1990s and the 2000s. I am focusing on 1969 and the best ten records from the year. The 1960s was a truly staggering decade and some of the very best records from the decade were released right at the very end. Have a look at these ten 1969-released albums and I am sure you will agree that the 1960s was a pretty....

99.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @priscilladupreez/Unsplash

FANTASTIC decade.

______________

The Beatles Abbey Road

bb.jpg

Release Date: 26th September, 1969 (U.K.)/1st October, 1969 (U.S.)

Label: Apple

Review:

Then, just for a moment, we're into Paul's "You Never Give Me Your Money," which seems more a daydream than an actual address to the girl he's thinking about. Allowed to remain pensive only for an instant, we're next transported, via Paul's "Lady Madonna" voice and boogie-woogie piano in the bridge, to this happy thought: "Oh, that magic feelin'/Nowhere to go." Crickets' chirping and a kid's nursery rhyme ("1-2-3-4-5-6-7/All good children go to heaven") lead us from there into a dreamy John number, "Sun King," in which we find him singing for the Italian market, words like amore and felice giving us some clue as to the feel of this reminiscent-of-"In My Room" ballad.

And then, before we know what's happened, we're out in John Lennon's England meeting these two human oddities, Mean Mr. Mustard and Polythene Pam. From there it's off to watch a surreal afternoon telly programme, Paul's "She Came In Through the Bathroom Window." Pensive and a touch melancholy again a moment later, we're into "Golden Slumbers," from which we wake to the resounding thousands of voices on "Carry That Weight," a rollicking little commentary of life's labours if ever there was one, and hence to a reprise of the "Money" theme (the most addicting melody and unforgettable words on the album). Finally, a perfect epitaph for our visit to the world of Beatle daydreams: "The love you take is equal to the love you make ..." And, just for the record, Paul's gonna make Her Majesty his.

I'd hesitate to say anything's impossible for him after listening to Abbey Road the first thousand times, and the others aren't far behind. To iy mind, they're equatable, but still unsurpassed” – Rolling Stone

Standout Track: Come Together

 

Led Zeppelin Led Zeppelin II

i.jpg

Release Date: 22nd October, 1969

Label: Atlantic

Review:

Every track on this record is musically brilliant, and in the span of just a few months it’s amazing how much Page had enriched the band’s sound. Chiming acoustic guitars provide the contrast to the crunch in a whole new way on “Ramble On” and “Thank You”, offering yet another template for mixing folk with proto-metal. “Whole Lotta Love” might have gotten the band sued by Willie Dixon, but there was no sonic precedent for it in rock music—it’s a sound that would have been unimaginable without the rise of drug culture. If you are not a drummer, it’s hard to imagine listening to “Moby Dick” very often, but better evidence of John Bonham’s genius is found elsewhere on the record. Zep’s rhythmic underpinning, especially the locked-in tandem of Jones and Bonham, was always their secret weapon, the thing that divided them from contemporaries like Black Sabbath” – Pitchfork

Standout Track: Moby Dick

The Rolling Stones Let It Bleed

ll.jpg

Release Date: 5th December, 1969

Labels: Decca (U.K.); London (U.S.)

Review:

The Stones were never as consistent on album as their main rivals, the Beatles, and Let It Bleed suffers from some rather perfunctory tracks, like "Monkey Man" and a countrified remake of the classic "Honky Tonk Woman" (here titled "Country Honk"). Yet some of the songs are among their very best, especially "Gimme Shelter," with its shimmering guitar lines and apocalyptic lyrics; the harmonica-driven "Midnight Rambler"; the druggy party ambience of the title track; and the stunning "You Can't Always Get What You Want," which was the Stones' "Hey Jude" of sorts, with its epic structure, horns, philosophical lyrics, and swelling choral vocals. "You Got the Silver" (Keith Richards' first lead vocal) and Robert Johnson's "Love in Vain," by contrast, were as close to the roots of acoustic down-home blues as the Stones ever got” – AllMusic   

Standout Track: Gimme Shelter                   

Nick Drake Five Leaves Left

ff.jpg

Release Date: 3rd July, 1969

Label: Island

Review:

Drake is often painted as a retiring man, yet he was often extremely vocal over his muse. He and Boyd initially fought over Drake's wish for a stripped back approach (which he eventually found on his last masterpiece, Pink Moon). In the end old college friend, Robert Kirby, provided orchestration that beautifully captured the yearning 'autumnal' element in the songs "Way To Blue" and "Day Is Done".

What's more, the string arrangement by Harry Robinson on "River Man" - possibly Drake's finest song - succinctly turned his Delius-meets-folk-jazz opus into something that no one had ever heard before. It's a key text for Drake fans, containing the return to nature matched against the infidelities of city life: A theme he would return to again and again, while the album title's sly reference to smoker's delights (as well as "Thoughts Of Mary Jane") showed that Drake was no stranger to the standard musician's indulgences.

Widely ignored upon its release, with hindsight it's easy to see how such ignorance conspired to make Drake a bitter man. Yet ultimately all we can do is bask in the unique vision captured here and be grateful that, for a short period, Nick Drake was able to share it with us all” – BBC

Standout Track: Way to Blue

Bob Dylan Nashville Skyline

nn.jpg

Release Date: 9th April, 1969  

Label: Columbia  

Review:

John Wesley Harding suggested country with its textures and structures, but Nashville Skyline was a full-fledged country album, complete with steel guitars and brief, direct songs. It's a warm, friendly album, particularly since Bob Dylan is singing in a previously unheard gentle croon -- the sound of his voice is so different it may be disarming upon first listen, but it suits the songs. While there are a handful of lightweight numbers on the record, at its core are several excellent songs -- "Lay Lady Lay," "To Be Alone With You," "I Threw It All Away," "Tonight I'll Be Staying Here With You," as well as a duet with Johnny Cash on "Girl From the North Country" -- that have become country-rock standards. And there's no discounting that Nashville Skyline, arriving in the spring of 1969, established country-rock as a vital force in pop music, as well as a commercially viable genre” – Allmusic

Standout Track: Lay, Lady, Lay

 

Dusty Springfield Dusty in Memphis

d.jpg

Release Date: 31st March, 1969

Label: Atlantic

Review:

Sometimes memories distort or inflate the quality of recordings deemed legendary, but in the case of Dusty in Memphis, the years have only strengthened its reputation. The idea of taking England's reigning female soul queen to the home of the music she had mastered was an inspired one. The Jerry Wexler/Tom Dowd/Arif Mardin production and engineering team picked mostly perfect songs, and those that weren't so great were salvaged by Springfield's marvelous delivery and technique. This set has definitive numbers in "So Much Love," "Son of a Preacher Man," "Breakfast in Bed," "Just One Smile," "I Don't Want to Hear About It Anymore," and "Just a Little Lovin'" and three bonus tracks: an unreleased version of "What Do You Do When Love Dies," "Willie & Laura Mae Jones" and "That Old Sweet Roll (Hi-De-Ho)." It's truly a disc deserving of its classic status” – AllMusic

Standout Track: Son of a Preacher Man

MC5 Kick Out the Jams

mc.jpg

Release Date: February 1969

Label: Elektra

Review:

Since 1965, singer Rob Tyner, guitarists Wayne Kramer and Fred “Sonic” Smith, bassist Michael Smith and drummer Dennis Thompson had been cutting their teeth in and around the Motor City: gradually evolving from British Invasion and garage rock foundations to incorporate the region’s R&B influences and even the work of free jazz exponents like John Coltrane and space-jazz legend Sun-Ra.

The latter’s unique aesthetic would duly inform Kick Out the Jams’ tripped-out "Starship," while those osmosis-acquired R&B and blues lessons made their presence known in apocalyptic blasts like "Rocket Reducer No. 62 (Rama Lama Fa Fa Fa)," "‘Motor City is Burning" and "I Want You Right Now." Finally, the young group’s interpretation of rock and roll history resulted in heavy rock and proto-punk slabs such as "Ramblin’ Rose," "Come Together" and "Borderline." Fittingly, the LP stirred public opinion as soon as it hit record store shelves — seemingly because of Tyner’s profane invocation while announcing the title track (later overdubbed with “Kick out the jams, brothers and sisters”), but primarily due to the militant associations spearheaded by band manager John Sinclair.

Much more than a simple manager, Sinclair carefully orchestrated a comprehensive philosophical manifesto for the MC5 — one that went well beyond their music and, although rooted in the same, wide-ranging call for societal reform prevalent throughout the late-‘60s, took things quite a few steps further into fiery activism and included a controversial affiliation with the White Panther Party.

Between these two points of conflict, mainstream retail chains were soon refusing to carry the album (and anything released by Elektra, for that matter), inevitably forcing the record company to censor Tyner’s rallying cry, as explained above (though not before limited quantities landed behind record store counters), and irreparably damaging band/label relations.

Within the year, Sinclair would be incarcerated on trumped-up drugs charges, Elektra would drop the MC5 for fear of further recriminations, and the band would never recover their musical or emotional momentum, thus making Kick Out the Jams an even more historically unique and, ironically, powerful musical statement that still reverberates down the decades” – Ultimate Classic Rock

Standout Track: Kick Out the Jams

 

Scott Walker Scott 4

4.jpg

Release Date: November 1969

Labels: Phillips; Fontana

Review:

Walker dropped out of the British Top Ten with his fourth album, but the result was probably his finest '60s LP. While the tension between the bloated production and his introspective, ambitious lyrics remains, much of the over-the-top bombast of the orchestral arrangements has been reined in, leaving a relatively stripped-down approach that complements his songs rather than smothering them. This is the first Walker album to feature entirely original material, and his songwriting is more lucid and cutting. Several of the tracks stand among his finest. "The Seventh Seal," based upon the classic film by Ingmar Bergman, features remarkably ambitious (and relatively successful) lyrics set against a haunting Ennio Morricone-style arrangement. "The Old Man's Back Again" also echoes Morricone, and tackles no less ambitious a lyrical palette; "dedicated to the neo-Stalinist regime," the "old man" of this song was supposedly Josef Stalin. "Hero of the War" is also one of Walker's better vignettes, serenading his war hero with a cryptic mix of tribute and irony. Other songs show engaging folk, country, and soul influences that were largely buried on his previous solo albums” – AllMusic

Standout Track: The Seventh Seal

 

The Stooges The Stooges

sss.jpg

Release Date: 5th August, 1969

Label: Elektra

Review:

The Stooges were signed to the peace-and-love promoting Elektra Records when A&R man Danny Fields caught them in concert as he was signing the MC5. After being forced by label boss Jac Holzman to write more material, The Stooges was produced by John Cale immediately after leaving the Velvet Underground. Cale’s all-faders-open production is one of the most exciting captured on record. This is rock at its most primordial. Ron Asheton’s guitar solo on “I Wanna Be Your Dog” has absolutely nothing to do with virtuoso grandstanding – it’s played as if his whole life depends on it. “No Fun” dispels any notion that the 60s were all about hippie harmony

The Stooges’ debut album is the original punk rock rush on record, a long-held well-kept secret by those in the know. The influence on John Lydon and Mark E. Smith in particular is immense. Rolling Stone said in 1992 that “there’s a finely honed metal-edge to the Stooges' Motor City psychedelia that keeps it from sounded dated.” This is absolutely true; it sounds like it’s been recorded in a garage this very morning” – BBC

Standout Track: 1969

 

Creedence Clearwater Revival Willy and the Poor Boys

cc.jpg

Release Date: 2nd November, 1969

Label: Fantasy

Review:

Make no mistake, Willy & the Poor Boys is a fun record, perhaps the breeziest album CCR ever made. Apart from the eerie minor-key closer "Effigy" (one of John Fogerty's most haunting numbers), there is little of the doom that colored Green RiverFogerty's rage remains, blazing to the forefront on "Fortunate Son," a working-class protest song that cuts harder than any of the explicit Vietnam protest songs of the era, which is one of the reasons that it hasn't aged where its peers have. Also, there's that unbridled vocal from Fogerty and the ferocious playing on CCR, which both sound fresh as they did upon release. "Fortunate Son" is one of the greatest, hardest rock & rollers ever cut, so it might seem to be out of step with an album that is pretty laid-back and friendly, but there's that elemental joy that by late '69 was one of CCR's main trademarks. That joy runs throughout the album, from the gleeful single "Down on the Corner" and the lazy jugband blues of "Poorboy Shuffle" through the great slow blues jam "Feelin' Blue" to the great rockabilly spiritual "Don't Look Now," one of Fogerty's overlooked gems. The covers don't feel like throwaways, either, since both "Cotton Fields" and "The Midnight Special" have been overhauled to feel like genuine CCR songs. It all adds up to one of the greatest pure rock & roll records ever cut” – AllMusic  

Standout Track: Down on the Corner

FEATURE: Vinyl Corner: Peter Gabriel - So

FEATURE:

 

 

Vinyl Corner

so.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

Peter Gabriel - So

__________

IT would take a patient person…

R-544933-1283196909.jpeg.jpg

 IN THIS IMAGE: The cover for Peter Gabriel (1982); the songwriter’s fourth solo album/IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

to tolerate an artist who released four eponymous albums in a row – in fact, releasing more than one would test patience! When Peter Gabriel released his fourth eponymous record in 1982; many wondered whether he was going to keep doing it and where it would all end! Think about the difficulty of doing that today. It would be a nightmare when it came to searching and ordering it from a record shop would be a bit of a palaver! 1982’s Peter Gabriel contained some strong songs but was not as well-received as some of his earlier work. A commercial change was needed and the outsider, cooler-than-anyone songwriter needed to take a leap. Although Gabriel claims So is a commercial album and one that he is not completely happy with; many consider it his finest record and it was a huge leap. The use of the Fairlight CMI synthesizer – which would inspire artists like Kate Bush to use it in their work – was still used but phased out to an extent by the time of 1986’s So. Even though there was more accessibility and commercial appeal; Gabriel was mixing genres as far-flung as Soul, World and Art-Rock into this complex and heady brew! The fact that his fifth solo album was the first non-eponymous effort sort signalled a shift to get his music properly marketed.

The album’s lead single, Sledgehammer, signalled what Gabriel was all about and why the album became so popular. The slam and catchiness of the song; the propulsive swagger and physicality of the song has lasted through the decades and is one of Gabriel’s best-loved songs. The trippy, animated video scooped awards and blew plenty of minds. Even by today’s standards, Sledgehammer’s video is groundbreaking and forward-thinking. One reason why So is perfect for a close investigation and should be bought on vinyl is because of the textures and variations on the record. From the chugging Sledgehammer we have the raw emotion and touching Don’t Give Up. A duet with Kate Bush – who was an early collaborator of Gabriel and appeared on Games Without Frontiers (1980) -; it shows Gabriel as a man whose dreams have been lost and his frailty is coming through. There is a gloom and hopelessness but, as Bush comes in, that plea to keep holding on emerges. Bush asks him not to surrender and provides a pillow for his troubles. African and Brazilian beats were coming into his music and, although So is the least experimental album from Gabriel; it is the one that gets into the head quickest and remains the longest. There is that radio-friendly sound to singles like Sledgehammer but the songwriting genius and incredible range from Gabriel means it could never be seen as chart-fodder or anything other than exceptional.

19.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Peter Gabriel recording in 1986/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Before looking at some of the standout tracks; here is a look inside the recording process and how Gabriel attacked his fifth album:

The studio's basic equipment consisted of "two analog 24-track machines, a Studer A80, and a Studer A80 shell that had been modified by a local electronics wizard, with its own audio cards and transport controls".[nb 2] To record vocals a Neumann U47 tube microphone and a Decca compressor were used without equalization.[8] All of So's songs were made in a similar format. Gabriel would record a piano demo on a modified "B machine" and play this to the band. During rehearsals, the band would listen to the B machine through headphones and record their output onto the "A machine"; parts of Gabriel's demo would also be transferred to the A machine at this stage. Subsequent takes of the song were then put onto the B machine in order for the band to hear what they had played with the demo, as well as the song's new and old takes.[8]

Other equipment included the "groundbreaking" Fairlight CMI synthesizer, which Gabriel said in an interview for Billboard meant "more human imagination is involved". He added, "the creative decision-making process has become more important than technique. You have a wider range of tools, a wider range of decisions".[9][10] Although remaining continually inspired to produce new music, he often struggled to write lyrics and would procrastinate.[11] His proclivity to being dissatisfied with them required Killen to isolate certain vocal performances as the master track, in order to keep other tracks available so new lyrics could be edited in.[8] Lanois took adverse measures to encourage his writing, such as destroying his much-used telephone in the nearby woods and, on one occasion, nailed the studio door shut to lock him inside.[11]

 

Towards the end of recording, Gabriel became "obsessed" with the track listing and created an audio cassette of all the song's beginnings and ends to hear how the sounds blended together.[12] He wanted to have "In Your Eyes" as the final track, but its prominent bassline meant it had to be placed earlier on the vinyl edition as there is more room for the stylus to vibrate. With later CD releases, this restriction was removed and the track was placed at the end of the album.[13] So was completed in February 1986 and cost £200,000 to make”.

Even if Gabriel disliked the idea of titling an album – as it distracted from the cover art and design – there is a slightly nonchalance and shrugging with So (it is almost sarcastic in its brevity). If the master was a bit unsure of his new direction, the songwriting was incredible. In Your Eyes is one of his greatest love songs and, against such diverse and eclectic progeny shows the sheer wonder and scope of So. The track features a pounding heartbeat of a drum and a potent vocal performance from Youssou N’Dour (singing in his native Senegalese). Big Time is one of my favourite songs from the album and has a definite Funk vibe. The lyrics slam the yuppie scene of the 1980s and that gaudy commercialism!

The song helped Gabriel assess his own life and whether he wanted fame at all – lest he turn into the sort of figure he was satirising on Big Time. It is hard to get a grip on all the scenes, stories and sounds inherent in a masterful record! If there were reservations from Gabriel regarding So and a move away from his usual working pattern; critical reviews and awards showed the music he was making could not be faulted. Rolling Stone said this of the record:

The bravado of “Sledgehammer” is undercut by the solemnity of “Don’t Give Up,” in which Gabriel outlines the despair of “a man whose dreams have all deserted.” In this one, Gabriel is haunted and defeated, acknowledging his frailty. A mournful melody is interrupted when a ray of hope — embodied by Kate Bush — penetrates the gloom. “Don’t give up,” she breathes with the voice of life itself, “‘cos you have friends.” Every time Gabriel proffers a reason for surrender, Bush answers him back with a litany of comfort. “Rest your head,” comes her simple advice, “you worry too much.”

He seems to find what he’s looking for “In Your Eyes,” perhaps the closest thing to a conventional love ballad Gabriel has ever recorded, though what he sees in her eyes is symbolic and Graillike in the extreme: “In your eyes/I see the doorway to a thousand churches/In your eyes/The resolution of all the fruitless searches.” The pomp and pretentiousness of such a sentiment might collapse under its own weight were Gabriel not shrewd enough to underscore the song with a roiling pancultural jamboree of scat featuring guest vocalist Youssou N’dour.

So is a record of considerable emotional complexity and musical sophistication. Beneath its disarming simplicity and accessibility is the voice of an artist who does what his heart tells him to do. That So would finally bring Peter Gabriel commercial success is an extremely positive sign for the acceptability of intelligence on the airwaves and in pop music in general”.

gg.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

So was nominated for an Album of the Year Grammy but lost out to Paul Simon’s Graceland – if you are going to lose to anyone... – and Sledgehammer got five nods in 1986 (including Record of the Year and Song of the Year). The track won for its video at the Brit Awards and there were many more nominations. So is seen as one of the defining statements of the 1980s and one of the greatest albums ever made. It showed an experimental artist could make a move into the mainstream without losing pace and compromising. So does have that experimental side but there are hooks and big anthems; challenges and complex interactions move alongside something free-flowing and easy. It remains one of those immense achievements and constantly features in critics’ all-time finest album rundowns. Gabriel pushed what a Pop number could be. He could have a powerful and quotable chorus but put twisting hooks and nuanced into the blend; little surprises and exciting diversions. Maybe Gabriel was keen to get more commercial success and see his work proffered more but the move proved effective. Those who preferred his eponymous artiness found much to love in So whilst those unaware of his music were provided something fresh and fantastic.

Gabriel spoke to Rolling Stone in 1987 as he was touring the album. He discussed some of the themes and stories that inspired the music:

The fact that some of those growing pains are reflected on So is one of the reasons Geffen Records is so happy with the album. “Throughout the years, I didn’t really know who the man behind the mask was,” says the label’s Gary Gersh. “With this album, part of the idea behind our whole marketing campaign was letting people know that there really wasn’t a mask anymore, that the man was actually touchable. You can listen to the record and get inside his emotions.”

There’s one subject that touchable man finds himself returning to again and again, and with a little prompting Gabriel locates it. “There is some sense of, uh…,” he says, then pauses for a long time. “Alienation is a common theme, which is the struggle to break out of a sense of separation.”

And has that been a struggle in his own life?

“Yeah, I think so,” he says, and his voice gets even softer than usual. “Definitely.”

“My lifestyle hasn’t really changed,” Gabriel says, shrugging. “I’ve lived comfortably for five to seven years now, but I still look to save a few pennies here and there, because that’s a very hard habit to get out of.” He has no plans, he says, to move out of the quiet English community in the Cotswolds where he lives. Nobody there makes a fuss about the resident pop star unless he’s on Top of the Pops...

 

But he does want new video equipment and an upgraded studio, and he wants the time to experiment by making videos for all the So tunes not yet turned into clips. He would like to mount a performance-art piece and tour smaller halls next summer. And he’s still interested in the idea of an alternative park that would be “a mixture of amusement park, art gallery, university and holiday camp.” It combines many of his current fascinations: high technology, behavioral research, environmental and interactive art. Plus some old-fashioned thrills, courtesy of the author and psychiatrist R.D. Laing, who has talked with Gabriel about a Ride of Fears, in which the most common phobias would be presented with increasing intensity until the rider conquers them all or pushes a panic button”.

So has gone down in legend and is a perfect album to buy on vinyl and relax to. Its details and secrets are unveiled as you listen and it is amazing to hear how much activity and sounds work alongside each other on an album that, on the surface, seems so simple. In 2012; Gabriel spoke to Rolling Stone again and looked back on a remarkable achievement:

Why do you think So managed to reach a much broader audience than your previous albums? 
There was less sort of esoteric songwriting. I think they were simpler songs in some ways, but I think we caught a wave. They were done with passion and we had a really good team working on them. Then, of course, we had things like the “Sledgehammer” video, which helped enormously. It got us a wider audience. Also, the one concession I agreed to was to place an actual photo of myself on the cover rather than the usual obscured stuff I had been doing....

 

You also gave this one an actual title.
It was named, yeah. That was a reluctant choice. In the old days I would go through my vinyl and identity each record by the picture, not by the title. I always liked that. In some ways, I’m just a visual person. It was the idea to just do away with titles. Give the pictures space to breathe and speak for themselves. But, of course, it caused confusion in the marketplace. The American record company, Geffen, got so fed up with me that they said they weren’t going to release my fourth record unless I gave it some title. So, it was called Security in America and it had no title everywhere else in the world.

The next time out I decided to go for the anti-title. There’s only two letters: So. It can be more a piece of graphic, if you like, as opposed to something with meaning and intention. And that’s what I’ve done ever since...

R-3784161-1448288853-6875.jpeg.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: The cover of Peter Gabriel’s 1992 album, As/IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images 

You didn’t release a follow-up to So for six years. Do you think that was a mistake? You sort of lost some momentum there.
I’m sure commercially it wasn’t the smartest thing to do, but I’ve never really worried about that. And to be honest, I think one of the reasons I’m still lucky enough to put out records and have audiences come to shows is cause I haven’t played that game very well. I think that consumer culture tends to be very hungry. It can’t get enough of you for a very short time and then your taste gets boring and they spit you out and take the next new thrill. And so, while it was never a predetermined strategy, I would probably recommend it to artists now if they want a long career. If you got something worth saying, if you’ve got something to put out, don’t worry about what the record company tells you. Take your time”.

Gabriel would go on to make other incredible albums but nothing matched the magic and genius of So. The Sledgehammer video alone took his music to new heights and would lead him to experiment with videos and push boundaries – although his later song, Steam, is seen as a second part of Sledgehammer; its visuals are staggering. I love So because you get contrasting songs against one another and there is that fearlessness. Gabriel could have gone in a new direction or faltered but he followed four eponymous records with something blistering and historic. As we look at a modern mainstream with few innovators and wonderful Pop albums; it is worth studying Peter Gabriel’s 1986 masterpiece and taken guidance from it. Your mind explodes and explores as the songs unfold and take you somewhere special. Between 1977-1982, Peter Gabriel released four self-titled albums and took four years to follow that up. Gabriel might have lost his name for his fifth album but he gained so much more! The stunning songwriter abandoned a well-trodden path and, in doing so, brought his incredible music...

TO the wider world.   

FEATURE: Ending the Decade in Style: Part IV/V: The Finest Albums of 1999

FEATURE:

 

 

Ending the Decade in Style

hhh.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @thomholmes/Unsplash 

Part IV/V: The Finest Albums of 1999

__________

THE reason I want to put together a new feature…

hhhgggff.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @trommelkopf/Unsplash

is to shine a light on the albums that end a decade with a huge bang. I feel it is hard to define what a decade is about and how it evolves but the first and last years are crucial. Entering a decade with a big album is a great way to stand out and, similarly, ending it with something stunning is vital. It can be hard leaving a brilliant and bountiful decade of music but I wanted to shine a light on the artists who brought out albums that did justice; gave hope the next decade would be full, exciting and brilliant. I will do a five-part series about albums that opened a decade with panache but, right now, the fourth in a five-part feature that collates the best decade-enders from the 1960s, 1970s; 1980s, 1990s and the 2000s. I am focusing on 1999 and the best ten records from the year. The 1990s was a wonderful time for music and produced some truly epic albums. One might assume the final year would not be as explosive and genius as the likes of 1991 and 1994 but, as these ten albums show, there was a pretty wonderful treat that greeted...

dds.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @crew/Unsplash

THE end of a brilliant decade.

______________

Eminem The Slim Shady LP

sss.jpg

Release Date: 23rd February, 1999

Labels: Aftermath; Interscope

Review:

The production -- masterminded by Dr. Dre but also helmed in large doses by Marky and Jeff Bass, along with Marshall himself -- mirrors his rhymes, with their spare, intricately layered arrangements enhancing his narratives, which are always at the forefront. As well they should be -- there are few rappers as wildly gifted verbally as Eminem. At a time when many rappers were stuck in the stultifying swamp of gangsta clichés, Eminem broke through the hardcore murk by abandoning the genre's familiar themes and flaunting a style with more verbal muscle and imagination than any of his contemporaries. Years later, as the shock has faded, it's those lyrical skills and the subtle mastery of the music that still resonate, and they're what make The Slim Shady LP one of the great debuts in both hip-hop and modern pop music” – AllMusic    

Standout Track: My Name Is

 

The Flaming Lips The Soft Bulletin

hh.jpg

Release Date: 17th May, 1999

Label: Warner Bros.

Review:

The song alternates between pixie dust and angel dust-- first it flows, then it swaggers with a killer Moog-and-drum battle with the audience going Qui-Gon at the altar of the Bulletin. The following cut, "The Spark That Bled", is even more adventurous. Coyne's little boy vocals take on a philharmonic of yearning, tackling it down with its ambiguous "I stood up and I said 'Yeah'" chorus. 4AD used to be this dreamy-- now they're picking at leftover Red House Painters demos and wondering when people are going to like Kristin Hersh. (Never, by the way.) This is on Warner Brothers?!

Oh, but there's more. So much more. Drummer Steven Drozd gets mad props for his thundering percussion which, for the most part, was recorded on one microphone. Hard to believe during a dense number like my personal favorite track, "The Gash". As much as I giggled over the title, I was bowled over by the song. A gospel choir sings an inspirational (!) song of perseverance over tweaked synth tracks and louder-than-Christ funky drumming. I defy you to listen to it without seeing just how loud your stereo can get.

Drozd also makes quick work of "Waitin' for a Superman", another inspirational piece-- one that was inspired by the death of Coyne's father. The result is this band's "Losing My Religion". Seriously. If Top 40 gets ahold of this song, we're all going to be very, very sick of it. Still, it's an amazing track, a shuffling dirge with a few bells, and two amazingly well-placed trumpet blasts, but mostly just some slightly hungover piano.

Speaking of death, it's a lingering theme on The Soft Bulletin. "Suddenly Everything Has Changed" is a neat, twisty little ditty about how thoughts of mortality can attack you when you least expect it. "Feeling Yourself Disintegrate" is a more direct rumination on the subject, a dreamy blast of vacuum cleaner guitar and reverb, reverb, reverb! Again, hardly party music, but remember Dark Side of the Moon? Pass the bong. This is some good shit” – Pitchfork

Standout Track: Waitin’ for a Superman

Beck Midnite Vultures

bec.jpg

Release Date: 23rd November, 1999

Label: DGC

Review:

'Midnite Vultures' is bound to entrench opinions on both sides of the Beck divide. The doubters will recoil from its myriad layers of self-knowledge and the fact that the author's tongue is almost permanently lodged in one cheek or another. But just because this isn't a conventional dose of 'reality' doesn't mean Beck can't be sincere, and the force of character laid bare here is quite an awesome thing to behold. Narrower in scope than 'Odelay' but more immediate in impact, it's clearly been conceived as an accompaniment to our hedonistic habit of choice, the last great party album of the millennium. And like a certain song says, parties weren't meant to last” – NME  

Standout Track: Sexx Laws                            

TLC FanMail

R-1537261-1249998491.jpeg.jpg

Release Date: 23rd February, 1999

Labels: LaFace; Arista

Review:

Almost ten producers worked on the record, all trying to replicate the easy, appealing sound of Crazysexycool. And "replicate" is the right word, since there are no new innovations on FanMail, apart from a few lifts from the Timbaland book of tricks. Nevertheless, that may be for the best, since TLC and their army of producers have spent time crafting the songs and productions, turning FanMail into a record that almost reaches the peaks of its predecessor. By the end of the record, it appears that they can do it all -- funky, hip-hop-fueled dance-pop, seductive ballads, and mid-tempo jams -- and they can do it all well. Other groups try to reach these heights, but they don't have the skills or the material to pull it off quite so well. True, the five-year wait felt interminable, and they're now standard-bearers instead of pioneers, but if takes TLC as long to make a sequel to FanMail, so be it -- they have one of the best track records in '90s urban soul” – AllMusic

Standout Track: No Scrubs

Basement Jaxx Remedy

R-2837-1204603046.jpeg.jpg

Release Date: 10th May, 1999

Label: XL

Review:

BASEMENT JAXX Remedy (Astralwerks) British DJs Simon Ratcliffe and Felix Buxton may have sharpened their sample-trigger fingers in the Brixton underground, but this dynamic duo has a knack for leavening deep house grooves with passion and wit. Their debut album, Remedy, shines a thousand points of light down on the dance floor with shimmering jams that connect the dots between Soul II Soul’s elegant hip-hop, Prince’s one-world utopianism, and DJ Armand Van Helden’s relentless thump science. This blissful joy ride is hard to resist and easy to love” – Entertainment Weekly   

Standout Track: Red Alert

 

Mos Def Black on Both Sides

R-4948161-1380295643-7410.jpeg.jpg

Release Date: 12th October, 1999

Labels: Rawkus; Priority

Review:

The main reference points are pretty much the same -- old-school rap, which allows for a sense of playfulness as well as history, and the Native Tongues posse's fascination with jazz, both for its sophistication and cultural heritage. But they're supported by a rich depth that comes from forays into reggae (as well as its aura of spiritual conscience), pop, soul, funk, and even hardcore punk (that on the album's centerpiece, "Rock n Roll," a dissection of white America's history of appropriating black musical innovations). In keeping with his goal of restoring hip-hop's sociopolitical consciousness, Def's lyrics are as intelligent and thoughtfully crafted as one would expect, but he doesn't stop there -- he sings quite passably on several tracks, plays live instruments on others (including bass, drums, congas, vibraphone, and keyboards), and even collaborates on a string arrangement. In short, Black on Both Sides is a tour de force by an artist out to prove he can do it all. Its ambition and execution rank it as one of the best albums of 1999, and it consolidates Mos Def's position as one of hip-hop's brightest hopes entering the 21st century” – AllMusic

Standout Track: Umi Says                      

Moby Play

nn.jpg

Release Date: 17th May, 1999

Labels: Mute; V2; EMI

Review:

Portions of this techno imp’s best album since 1995’s Everything Is Wrong are built on a simple premise: setting snippets from old blues and gospel recordings to new rhythmic (not always electronic) settings. What could’ve been a condescending gimmick yields some of the year’s most haunting, and haunted, music. Moby’s elegant soundscapes wipe away the mustiness on these decades-old voices and make the singers’ heartache and hope seem fresh again. Although in need of a bit of pruning (notable exception: the gorgeous ”Porcelain,” featuring Moby’s own plaintive vocal), Play is music that truly moves back to the future” – Entertainment Weekly

Standout Track: Natural Blues

 

Rage Against the Machine The Battle of Los Angeles

rrr.jpg

Release Date: 2nd November, 1999

Label: Epic

Review:

Rather than illuminate a political injustice with narrative (a la Dylan’s “Hurricane”), de la Rocha opts to incite with fiery slogans of agitprop. “All hell can’t stop us now” is the conclusion of “Guerrilla Radio”; “My panther, my brother/We are at war until you’re free” is the refrain of “Voice of the Voiceless,” a song about Mumia Abu-Jamal, a former Black Panther on death row in Philadelphia for a cop murder he says he didn’t commit. Though some may find the lyrics naive and over the top, fans do take them to heart — though not always in context, as can be attested by anyone who saw the marauding teens chanting, “I won’t do what you tell me” as they lit a match to Woodstock ’99. Rage Against the Machine may never ignite the youth war they want to see. But at last, with The Battle of Los Angeles, they’ve managed to win a war within — one in which the band’s notoriously feuding members have come together to produce a sound that’s not quite louder than a bomb but that’s definitely as loud as Led Zeppelin II” – Rolling Stone

Standout Track: Guerrilla Radio     

 

Missy Elliott Da Real World

Release Date: 22nd June, 1999

Label: EastWest America

Review:

Thankfully, Da Real World is clearly a Missy Elliott album in most respects, with Timbaland's previously trademarked, futuristic-breakbeat production smarts laced throughout. The churchgoing Elliott has often remarked that she wishes she didn't need profanity to get attention, and the album accordingly includes satirical nods to other clichéd notions of hip-hop -- the single "She's a Bitch" is the best example, wherein Elliott reappropriates the insult to refer to strong females. She also takes on the cartoonish Eminem for "Bus a Rhyme," a track that turns out to be one of the best on the album. Da Brat and Aaliyah make repeat appearances, and Redman and OutKast's Big Boi also contribute to this excellent follow-up” – AllMusic      

Standout Track: She’s a Bitch                                        

 

The Chemical Brothers Surrender

ssss.jpg

Release Date: 21st June, 1999

Labels: Freestyle Dust; Virgin; Astralweeks

Review:

Surrender is both the Chemical Brothers most immediately satisfying work and, perhaps not coincidentally, the most like a rock album of their career. Unlike a fair share of techno, these songs feel like "songs," not a collection of clever samples and a race to the fastest BPM on the planet. Yeah, you can go out and buy your jungle, your trance, your trip-hop and your ambient, but why would you when you'd be sacrificing the greatest gift of all: Surrender's love and understanding” – Pitchfork

Standout Track: Hey Girl Hey Boy         

FEATURE: Joy Division: Is It Time to Look Back and Bring the ‘Pop’ Back into the Mainstream?!

FEATURE:

 

 

Joy Division

88.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @wenutius/Unsplash   

Is It Time to Look Back and Bring the ‘Pop’ Back into the Mainstream?!

__________

I have touched on this subject a few times…

kk.jpg

ILLUSTRATION CREDIT: Jamie Cullen 

but it warrants a bit of a repeat. One of the reasons I tend to look back when listening to music – rather than looking at the now – is the sense of uplift I get! Maybe it is easy to hark back to the music we grew up around and know we are in for something wonderful. This music is tried and tested and we know, whenever it plays, we will be in a better mood. I will bring in an album that keeps coming back to my mind but I have to ask what is happening in the mainstream. I know it is not the be all and end all of music and the only thing that matters. There are wonderful artists working in every sector of music that does not get the spotlight deserved. I know genres like Soul, Grime and Folk have some mainstream inclusion but not as integrated as they should be. When we see the word ‘mainstream’, our minds look at Pop and maybe Rock. That is fair enough, I guess, as this is what is played on the biggest radio stations and what is hovering around the charts. In terms of the sensation we get from the mainstream artists; can we truly say the music coming through puts us in a better mood?! Most of the songs I hear are either really quite defeatist in terms of their lyrics or, if the words are quite sprite, it is let down by a rather lumpen and unaccomplished compositions.

There are some great Popstars who can bring some genuine fizz and excitement and, more often than not, are genuinely trying to have fun. Fun does not mean compromising substance and projecting something meaningful. It is a hard act to balance but I have noticed, more and more, the mainstream is a lot more resigned, inward-looking and, well...miserable. I was researching for this piece and came across a Pitchfork article that holds the same onions:

Quick: Name the fun song on the Billboard charts right now—the celebratory one, the one about embracing life, about living like tonight is the last night. Not just the fun song, but the FUN! song, the one accompanied by glitter bombs and T-shirt cannons. Normally there are at least five flouncing around the upper reaches of the Hot 100, impervious to trends: “Uptown Funk” or “Shut Up and Dance”; “Can’t Stop the Feeling!” or “Happy” or “Shake It Off.”

Still looking? Yeah, you won’t find it.

Skip across playlists or tangle with a car radio dial and you will quickly absorb that the world is an awful, squalid place, where emo-rap stars like Juice WRLD take “prescriptions to feel A-OK” and where “Sicko Mode,” a hit song released in the dead of summer, begins with the words “sun is down, freezing cold.” Bebe Rexha, a songwriter whose persona and style switches completely from song to song, is currently at No. 39 with “I’m a Mess,” where the line “It’s gonna be a good, good life” is chased with a bitter “that’s what my therapist say,” and the chorus rewrites Meredith Brooks’ “Bitch” for the age of pure anhedonia: “I’m a mess, I’m a loser, I’m a hater, I’m a user”.

It seems the mainstream market has streamlined and there is a move towards a more ‘realistic’ view of the world. Artists, for some reason, feel the realities of heartache and life kicking you in the scrotum is a much more marketable vibe than promoting the wonders of life. We are told, more and more, that there is a mental-health crisis (and there is) but I wonder whether we are being flooded with this message. It is great we can connect with an artist because they feel the same way as us but, rather than providing inspiring and positive messages, there is this negative and submissive impression that is getting rather heavy. Once was the time when Pop was there to get us all happy and move the body; when artists could be heartbroken but there was this sunshine and chance to get better. When was the last time you checked out what was in the charts or on the radio and heard a song that genuinely, without irony, was talking about moving on up and embracing life?!

Aren’t pop songs generally meant to lift us up? Or at least make us forget, for a moment, how terrible everything else is? One good working definition of a pop song might be “a three-minute reminder that hedonism exists.” How and when did things turn so morose?

The armchair-cultural-anthropologist answer is the easiest one: Everything is garbage! Who wants to celebrate when the world is crumbling? It’s a seductive explanation. After all, many of us are currently grappling with the reality that the Earth will probably be partially drowned within the next four or five presidential administrations (assuming presidential administrations keep happening)”.

It is not just the Pop genre that is to blame for the funk. I think there has been a move, through the years, away from the mainstream star who was promoting something pumping, energised and catchy to the more private, anxious and ‘aware’ artist. Maybe the state of the world and the feeling of depression a lot of us feel needs to be presented in music and we need to feel musicians understand us. Other genres are less keen to explore this side of life so, as they are the leaders of the mainstream, the Pop elite have to address this. I do wonder whether we need to assimilate other genres into the mix in order to find some more energy and optimism. You can say Hip-Hop and Rap is at its best when not entirely entwined with the mainstream and left to its own devices. Whilst there are powerhouse newcomers like Cardi B, Travis Scott and Anderson .Paak out there at the moment; I tend to find I am rarely uplifted by what they are saying. The energy is there in the music and one can hear some warmth but the lyrics are not the sort that stick in the head and make me smile – maybe they are not supposed to. Is Rap and Hip-Hop in need of a bit of a shake-up?

Crippling depression amid unspeakable luxury has been a default setting in rap for a long time now, from Kanye to Drake to Future. And the spiritual avatar of this feeling right now, at least on the pop charts, is Travis Scott. Scott has been involved in Kanye’s work for at least five years, dating back to the sessions for Yeezus. Now, he is atop the charts with a massive and sprawling work of his own, ASTROWORLD. The fundamental presumption of Travis Scott music is that nothing feels good, especially not the stuff that’s meant to. “She thought it was the ocean, it’s just a pool,” Scott mutters on “Sicko Mode”—not the mindset of someone particularly enamored with their spoils of success, or impressed with the company it has brought them”.

t.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Travis Scott/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

I have mentioned a lot of the classic Rap and Hip-Hop artists like the Beastie Boys and De La Soul and what they were all about. I love the humour and the comedy you can get with Beastie Boys. Think about the way they could splice in cutting jabs and weird sentiments with some brilliant sounds that punched in the heart. Maybe there were a bit of a rarity but the scene around them was not plagued by depression and a lack of hope. In the modern-day lexicon; there is not a sense there is much to shout about and feel happy about. We are seeing artists succumb to addiction and depression and, as such, the music has to reflect that struggle. I am not sure when the emotional decline began and how we got here but, more and more, the quick-listen, playlist-in-the-background culture has seen a move away from the more rousing and fulsome number to the slightly less challenging and more downbeat mood. I said I was going to bring in an album – and I have already mentioned a couple of Hip-Hop artists who are guaranteed to lift my mood. Now That’s What I Call Music! 24 is the first album I ever bought and I remember the sheer delight of hearing it on my cassette player for the first time.

Not only was it thrilling walking into the music shop and finding this shiny cassette on the racks but playing all the music in-full was scintillating. The songs from this period (1993 and the previous year) stay in my mind because of the uplift and cheer. I am not saying music was all happy back then – Grunge was responsible for a lot of gloom and destruction – but these songs were indicative of the spirit of the time. Even when the songs were talking about something more strained and anguished; there was a more melodic note or sentiment that lifted the track up. Maybe The Bluebells’ Young at Heart was a cheesy way to start things but you could not argue against the optimism within. You have Take That’s Could It Be Magic and Informer by Snow. The latter is about the rapper being hassled by the 5-0 (the police) but its sheer energy and fun is hard to escape. Shaggy and The Stereo MC’s keep it going and you have World Party and Paul McCartney retaining that pace and energy. Peter Gabriel brings some Steam to the kitchen and there is a cracking offering from Lenny Kravitz (Are You Gonna Go My Way). It is an album that does not hide heartache more anxious songs but the abiding theme is joy and positive energy. The mainstream back then had to compete with the same issues as today regarding the more gloomy songs/artists but there was plenty of delight and energy to be found. The Dance scene was inspiring a generation and Britpop was around the corner.

Maybe I am idolising past days but I can see how things have changed and, the last few years especially, we are seeing this slide into a funk that will be hard to get ourselves away from. Even when artists try to write happy and gleeful songs – such as Happy by Pharrell Williams – it comes across as more grating than memorable. Pop artists are still capable of getting the heat on and making us move but there are few songs out there I can see lasting through the years. This BBC article looks at modern Pop songs and how they have changed – the use of the first-person narrative is rising:

A year before that, the journal Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts published a report which looked at how the language of popular song has changed over the last 30 years. Researchers took a sample set of the Top 10 most popular songs in America from 1980 to 2007, and looked at how words are used to try and assess how pop fans used music to soundtrack their emotional state at the time. The report suggests that, "Simply tuning in to the most popular songs on the radio may provide people with increased understanding of their generation's current psychological characteristics."

They found that the use of the first-person singular pronouns (the word 'I') has increased steadily over time, suggesting that fans have become more interested in reflective first-person songs. This matches a decline in words that emphasis community and working together. They also noted a rise in antisocial and angry words, suggesting that pop hits are reflecting a growing sense of personal fury and social unrest. Accusations with which Eminem will be familiar”.

nn.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @cbarbalis/Unsplash

Not only has Pop got more personal and first-person; it has, as Pitchfork have laid out, gotten darker and a lot sadder:

As pop gets softer, sadder, grimmer, darker, more intimate, something else happens—it shrinks. If pop music used to blare at us, it did so out of a certain confidence, a bone-deep certainty that it was one of the most important voices in our lives. We were a captive audience, or at least pop treated us that way. Like many cultural institutions, pop music feels chastened now, in retreat. The ground beneath it is shaky and it finds itself with no mountaintop to scream from. Now pop music lies coiled up inside our phones alongside everything else—the banalities of friends and strangers, the horrors of the news. It’s there if, and only if, we need it”.

Minor keys and slower tempos are becoming more popular and even when an artist is bringing the energy levels to dangerous heights, often their messages are not about togetherness and embracing sheer fun – you find a lot of accusation, bitterness and generic salaciousness coming out. Even though life can be a miserable shell and it can be really crap to get out there; do we necessarily want that reflected back at us through music? The reason music is so potent and inspiring, yes, is because we can relate to it but where does one go for escapism?!

I can hear a lot of 1980s sounds and vintage wisdom coming into modern music but those who are lifting the spirits are few and far between. Is subjectiveness and age playing a role in this grumble and assertion? Are we down on new music because we go back to our childhoods and remember the music we adored? This article explains when our musical tastes are locked-in and how brave we get with our tastes as we get older:

The New York Times has proof. They recruited author Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, whose Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, And What The Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are is a must-read, to discover why so many people still go to Gin Blossoms concerts (besides the fact that they still rule). Spotify provided the data, and Stephens-Davidowitz measured every Billboard chart-topping song released between 1960 and 2000 and the ages of their biggest fans when those songs first came out.

The results are illuminating, if not all that surprising. According to the data, the average man’s musical taste is developed between the ages of 13 and 16, while a woman’s takes shape between the ages of 11 and 14. Data also revealed that the early 20s are “half as influential” in determining adult musical tastes as their early teens. Radiohead’s “Creep,” for example, is the 164th most popular song among 38-year-old men—who would’ve been 13 when the song was released—while it’s not even in the top 300 for those born a decade earlier or later. We twenty- and thirtysomethings will never understand Ed Sheeran, nor will the children of our children, who will roll their eyes every time their parents play “Perfect” for the 30th time”.

vc.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @hyingchou/Unsplash 

Maybe I am being a bit cranky and nostalgia-drenched but, if the above is true, it means we are breeding a generation whose musical tastes are defined by what is out there now. Given the growing rate of mental illness and issues out there; shouldn’t music act as a contrast and lift the emotions to a special and safe place? If a child now is raised on modern mainstream and absorbs this for the rest of their days; will we have them humming depressive lyrics and gloomy synths instead of the big beats and rousing choruses that was rife in the past. Look at music from the 1950s to the early part of the last decade and there are years filled with joyful music and songs that will last the rest of time. It is counterintuitive writing music in a minor key and being closed-off in a society that is struggling with its mental-health. Music needs to rebel against this ill and is there to lift the spirit! One can write about their own lives and heartache but it is just as easy to throw in some top-notch bangers that grab life by the neck and hug it. I do fear the mainstream has gone too far down the rabbit hole to come back. How do we get to where we are now and have a scene that brings back that optimism and sunny disposition?! Say what you want about the reformation and touring of the Spice Girls but, even though they had their fair share of cheesy moments, the music they were putting out was designed to inspire and lift. Give me the choice of the modern top-forty and one of the finer Spice Girls cuts and that is...

NOT a hard choice to make.   

FEATURE: Ending the Decade in Style: Part III/V: The Finest Albums of 1979

FEATURE:

 

 

Ending the Decade in Style

bbbv.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @pear/Unsplash 

Part III/V: The Finest Albums of 1979

__________

THE reason I want to put together a new feature…

88888888.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @koalamoose/Unsplash

is to shine a light on the albums that end a decade with a huge bang. I feel it is hard to define what a decade is about and how it evolves but the first and last years are crucial. Entering a decade with a big album is a great way to stand out and, similarly, ending it with something stunning is vital. It can be hard leaving a brilliant and bountiful decade of music but I wanted to shine a light on the artists who brought out albums that did justice; gave hope the next decade would be full, exciting and brilliant. I will do a five-part series about albums that opened a decade with panache but, right now, the third in a five-part feature that collates the best decade-enders from the 1960s, 1970s; 1980s, 1990s and the 2000s. I am focusing on 1979 and the best ten records from the year. The 1970s is often seen as the greatest decade for music and many feel the 1980s is the worst. 1979 was, for many, the last year for fantastic music and the glorious end of a huge decade. Here is a selection of ten albums that ended the 1970s...

864.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @kxvn_lx/Unsplash

WITH huge style.

ALL ALBUM COVERS: Getty Images

______________

The Undertones The Undertones

uu.jpg

Release Date: 13th May, 1979

Labels: Sire; Aredeck-EMI; Rykodisc; Sanctuary Records (U.K. C.D. release).

Review:

What is a perfect album? One could make an argument that a perfect album is one that sets out a specific set of artistic criteria and then fulfills them flawlessly. In that respect, and many others, the Undertones' 1979 debut is a perfect album. The Northern Ireland quintet's brief story is no different than that of literally dozens of other bands to form in the wake of the Clash and, more importantly, the Buzzcocks, but the group infuses so much unabashed joy in their two-minute three-chord pop songs, and there's so little pretension in their unapologetically teenage worldview, that even the darker hints of life in songs like the suicide-themed "Jimmy Jimmy" are delivered with a sense of optimism at odds with so many of their contemporaries. There's no fewer than three all-time punk-pop classics here; besides that song, the singles "Teenage Kicks" and "Get Over You" are simple declarations of teenage hormonal lust that somehow manage to be cute instead of Neanderthal; perhaps it's Feargal Sharkey's endearingly adenoidal whine, or the chipper way the O'Neill brothers pitch in on schoolboy harmonies, like a teenage Irish Kinks” – AllMusic   

Standout Track: Teenage Kicks

The Clash London Calling

lll.jpg

Release Date: 14th December, 1979

Labels: CBS; Epic

Review:

London Calling certainly lives up to that challenge. With its grainy cover photo, its immediate, on-the-run sound, and songs that bristle with names and phrases from today’s headlines, it’s as topical as a broadside. But the album also claims to be no more than the latest battlefield in a war of rock & roll, culture and politics that’ll undoubtedly go on forever. “Revolution Rock,” the LP’s formal coda, celebrates the joys of this struggle as an eternal carnival. A spiraling organ weaves circles around Joe Strummer’s voice, while the horn section totters, sways and recovers like a drunken mariachi band. “This must be the way out,” Strummer calls over his shoulder, so full of glee at his own good luck that he can hardly believe it.” El Clash Combo,” he drawls like a proud father, coasting now, sure he’s made it home. “Weddings, parties, anything… And bongo jazz a specialty.”

But it’s Mick Jones who has the last word. “Train in Vain” arrives like an orphan in the wake of “Revolution Rock.” It’s not even listed on the label, and it sounds faint, almost overheard. Longing, tenderness and regret mingle in Jones’ voice as he tries to get across to his girl that losing her meant losing everything, yet he’s going to manage somehow” – Rolling Stone

Standout Track: London Calling

Donna Summer Bad Girls

99.jpg

Release Date: 25th April, 1979

Label: Casablanca

Review:

Producers Giorgio Moroder and Pete Bellotte recognized that disco was going in different directions by the late '70s, and they gave the leadoff one-two punch of "Hot Stuff" and "Bad Girls" a rock edge derived from new wave. The two-LP set was divided into four musically consistent sides, with the rocksteady beat of the first side giving way to a more traditional disco sound on the second side, followed by a third side of ballads, and a fourth side with a more electronic, synthesizer-driven sound that recalled Summer's 1977 hit "I Feel Love." Though remembered for its hits, the album had depth and consistency, concluding with "Sunset People," one of Summer's best album-only tracks. The result was the artistic and commercial peak of her career and, arguably, of disco itself” – AllMusic

Standout Track: Hot Stuff                         

Joy Division Unknown Pleasures

u.jpg

Release Date: 15th June, 1979

Label: Factory

Review:

Then, after such an auspicious start, Closer really clicks into gear. "Means to an End" is death disco before the fact, buoyed by a surprisingly rousing (and wordless) chorus. "Heart and Soul" is a remarkable collision of atmosphere and minimalism, the stuttering drum beat, synth and Peter Hook's melodic bass lead linked to one of Curtis' most subdued performances. "Heart and soul," he sings, as the stark instruments intertwine and twist together. "One will burn."

"Twenty Four Hours" briefly tries to pry free from the album's looming inevitability before "The Eternal" and "Decades" draw the music back down and the listener back in to Curtis' world. "The Eternal" is the bleakest thing the band ever recorded, and if "Decades" comes off a relative respite in comparison, the lyrics quickly quash that idea. "We knocked on the doors of Hell's darker chamber," moans Curtis. "Pushed to the limit, we dragged ourselves in” - Pitchfork

Standout Track: New Dawn Fades

Pink Floyd The Wall

Release Date: 30th November, 1979

Labels: Harvest; Columbia

Review:

The album opens by welcoming the unwitting listener to Floyd's show ("In the Flesh?"), then turns back to childhood memories of his father's death in World War II ("Another Brick in the Wall, Pt. 1"), his mother's over protectiveness ("Mother"), and his fascination with and fear of sex ("Young Lust"). By the time "Goodbye Cruel World" closes the first disc, the wall is built and Pink is trapped in the midst of a mental breakdown. On disc two, the gentle acoustic phrasings of "Is There Anybody Out There?" and the lilting orchestrations of "Nobody Home" reinforce Floyd's feeling of isolation. When his record company uses drugs to coax him to perform ("Comfortably Numb"), his onstage persona is transformed into a homophobic, race-baiting fascist ("In the Flesh"). In "The Trial," he mentally prosecutes himself, and the wall comes tumbling down. This ambitious concept album was an across-the-board smash, topping the Billboard album chart for 15 weeks in 1980. The single "Another Brick in the Wall, Pt. 2" was the country's best-seller for four weeks. The Wall spawned an elaborate stage show (so elaborate, in fact, that the band was able to bring it to only a few cities) and a full-length film. It also marked the last time Waters and Gilmour would work together as equal partners” – AllMusic

Standout Track: Another Brick in the Wall, Pt. 1 

Fleetwood Mac Tusk

t.jpg

Release Date: 12th October, 1979

Label: Warner Bros.

Review:

It’s not hard to imagine the voice of Buckingham’s internal foil during these sessions, whispering seedily, naysaying each new melody, pushing for more: “This is fine, but it’s not Art.” I don’t know anyone who cares about making things who hasn’t at some point lobbed the exact same challenge at themselves: Can’t you do better? Hasn’t someone done this before? Haven’t you done this before? You get the sense of a broken-down person trying to rebuild himself. He is diligent about getting the architecture right.

All of which makes “I Know I’m Not Wrong”—the first song the band started recording for Tusk, and the last one to be finished – even more poignant. When Tusk was reissued, in 2015, the expanded release included six (!) different “I Know I’m Not Wrong” demos, all recorded by Buckingham in his home studio. The chorus is a declaration of intention, of confidence: “Don't blame me/Please be strong/I know I'm not wrong.” It’s not a thing a person gets to say very often. But Tusk isn’t a record that gets made more than once” – Pitchfork

Standout Track: Tusk

Michael Jackson Off the Wall

R-120096-1374721428-4864.jpeg.jpg

Release Date: 10th August, 1979

Labels: Epic; CBS

Review:

In collaborating with producer Quincy Jones, Off The Wall found Jackson using his newly found creative freedom by departing from his previous Motown sound, instead opting for an album that combined disco, soul, pop, soft rock and funk influences. Additional to Jones' polished, professional productions, Michael Jackson collaborated with some of the finest songwriters of the time, including Paul McCartney, Stevie Wonder and Rod Temperton. As a result, Off The Wall became the first album ever to spawn four Billboard Top Ten singles: Don't Stop Til You Get Enough, Rock With You, Off The Wall and She's Out Of My Life.

Since it's release, Off The Wall has sold over fifteen million copies and many critics believe as an album it has not been bettered by any of Michael Jackson's subsequent output” – BBC

Standout Track: Don’t Stop 'Til You Get Enough

Talking Heads Fear of Music

ff.jpg

Release Date: 3rd August, 1979

Label: Sire

Review:

Worked up from jams (though Byrne received sole songwriter's credit), the music is becoming denser and more driving, notably on the album's standout track, "Life During Wartime," with lyrics that match the music's power. "This ain't no party," declares Byrne, "this ain't no disco, this ain't no fooling around." The other key song, "Heaven," extends the dismissal Byrne had expressed for the U.S. in "The Big Country" to paradise itself: "Heaven is a place where nothing ever happens." It's also the album's most melodic song. Those are the highlights. What keeps Fear of Music from being as impressive an album as Talking Heads' first two is that much of it seems to repeat those earlier efforts, while the few newer elements seem so risky and exciting. It's an uneven, transitional album, though its better songs are as good as any Talking Heads ever did” – AllMusic

Standout Track: Animals

The Jam Setting Sons

Release Date: 16th November, 1979

Label: Polydor

Review:

The Jam's Setting Sons was originally planned as a concept album about three childhood friends who, upon meeting after some time apart, discover the different directions in which they've grown apart. Only about half of the songs ended up following the concept due to a rushed recording schedule, but where they do, Paul Weller vividly depicts British life, male relationships, and coming to terms with entry into adulthood. Weller's observations of society are more pointed and pessimistic than ever, but at the same time, he's employed stronger melodies with a slicker production and comparatively fuller arrangements, even using heavy orchestration for a reworked version of Bruce Foxton's "Smithers-Jones." Setting Sons often reaches brilliance and stands among the Jam's best albums, but the inclusion of a number of throwaways and knockoffs (especially the out-of-place cover of "Heat Wave" which closes the album) mars an otherwise perfect album” – AllMusic

Standout Track: The Eton Riffles                     

Blondie Eat to the Beat

bb.jpg

Release Date: October 1979

Label: Chrysalis

Review:

Maybe this accounts for the stylistic ragbag that emerges. Eat To The Beat still bears the traces of the art punk roots that had given birth to them back in their CBGB's days in New York (on the title track, the manic Accidents Never Happen and Living In The Real World); but at times the album reads like a veritable history of chart styles: Here was their first proper foray into reggae with Die Young Stay Pretty, the Duane Eddy-at-the-disco grandeur of Atomic, the skittering, Spectorish pure pop of Dreaming and Union City Blue and the Motown stomp of Slow Motion. Sound-A-Sleep goes even further back into the kind of 50s dream pop that might feature in a David Lynch film. 

Americans, still hamstrung by the double-edged values of the late 60s, were always suspicious that a band first marketed as 'new wave' could be so mercenary and saw it as ersatz 'selling out', giving the album a lukewarm reception. Meanwhile in Europe their ability to soundtrack every great disco, wedding and barmitzvah was rightly valued. In the end, pop is pop and Blondie, at this point, were making the timeless variety that still sounds box fresh today
” – BBC

Standout Track: Union City Blue

FEATURE: Spotlight: Loyle Carner

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

111.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Loyle Carner snapped for Interview in May 2017/PHOTO CREDIT: Matt Holyoak

Loyle Carner

__________

THERE are a few artists who get all the love…

ll.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: The cover for Loyle Carner’s 2017 album, Yesterday’s Gone/IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images 

and seem to glide by without much trouble - and then there are those who have to fight a bit harder because their music means that much more. There was a lot of talk around Loyle Carner when his debut album, Yesterday’s Gone, arrived at the start of last year. I recall listening to the album when it came out and being blown away by the originality! There are British Hip-Hop and Rap artists who can move you and get the mind but none have the same personality and passion as Loyle Carner. It is something about his delivery and wordplay that is superior to the competition. One hears anger and determination but there is never needless aggression and boasting. The man has confidence and is slick with a rhyme but never boasts and shows off without being able to back it up. There is humbleness and modest that is hard to find in the genre and, unlike a lot of U.S. Hip-Hop artists, the subject matter is less about boasting and wealth and more concerned with the everyday lives and beat of the street. I think British Hip-Hop has always been second to that coming from America but with artists like Loyle Carner and Kate Tempest bringing their brand of poetry and passion to the party; we have some genuine competition for the giants of American Hip-Hop. Many have been asking whether there is going to be a follow-up to Yesterday’s Gone and what we might expect next year.

I guess two years is a little while when it comes to following up albums but Carner needs time to craft the material and get the feeling right. Benjamin Gerard Coyle-Larner (‘Loyle Carner’ is a spoonerism of his surname) is a Lambeth-born, Croydon-raised artist who was brought up by his mum, Jean, and stepdad (Nik) had minimal contact with his birth father growing up. Having been diagnosed with ADHD and dyslexia as a child; Loyle Carner moved through the ranks and fought hard to get his voice out there. He studied at the Brit School and was enrolling in a Drama degree when his birth father died of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Carner decided to embark on a career in music and focused on that passion. A dedicated Liverpool F.C. supporter and someone who wears his heart on sleeve; you can hear Carner’s life and loves spill out in his music. He is enormously close to his mum and she has even been involved in his music/videos. Everything about Carner has that honesty and humbleness. He is close to family and where he grew up and has not forgotten his roots. Yesterday’s Gone is the distillation of his early life and his rise; everything that made him and what he wants to achieve. The album was nominated for a Mercury Prize in 2017 and lost out to Sampha’s Process.

I felt Loyle Carner should have won the award and boasts the stronger record. Whilst Process has soulfulness and is emotional stunning; Yesterday’s Gone has more variation and lasts longer in the mind! The way Carner rhymes and raps; what conversational style and stunning flow that brings the words to life and paints vivid pictures - there are few out there like him. A sophistication can be heard through every song and the lyrics really grab you. It is as though you are rolling with Carner and walking along with him. A lot of Hip-Hop artists can divide with their aggressiveness or what they are talking about – a grand or dangerous life – but Loyle Carner takes you into his world and, like a musical host, shows you every sight and sound. Reviews for Yesterday’s Gone were hugely impressive and effusive. The Guardian had this to say:

It’s not all heavy going. Carner worries about girls too, and text messages (+44). Another interlude, Rebel 101, finds him being ordered to “eat bad food and party” by producer Rebel Kleff. But instead of posturing then landing a couple of blows to the soft tissue, Carner’s scuffed, wry flows grab you by the feels from the get-go and do not relinquish their grip. All of his candid songs so far have built up a picture of a thoughtful young man rejected by his biological father, sustained by his family, propelled forward by his ADHD diagnosis (he has set up a cookery programme for others with the condition, Chili Con Carner)...

On Florence, he imagines cooking pancakes for an imaginary little sister; Kwes sings the hook. The death of his beloved stepfather in 2014 prompted Carner to give up a place at the Brit School studying drama to take his place as a breadwinner. In this sense he’s a hustler, parlaying his biography into pounds and pence”.

NME approached the L.P. from another angle:

On ‘Yesterday’s Gone’ US rap’s trademark arrogance 
is replaced by unabashed sensitivity and some serious emotional openness. If it seems like you’re listening to Coyle-Larner reading out his diary when you listen, well, that’s because you kind of are. This is music as catharsis, with much of the sonically laid-back album dealing with family, loss and friendship, over lived-in J Dilla and Tribe Called Quest-worthy beats. But that’s not to say that there aren’t some significant bangers in the mix. As epic album openers go, ‘The Isle Of Arran’ is way up there. A glorious gospel choir sample and a warm old-school soul sound both 
play out behind Coyle-Larner’s effortless flow, as he serves up a heartrending study of grief and a family in turmoil, like Kanye West had he watched one too many episodes of EastEnders”.

It is interesting listening to The Isle of Arran and hearing all those layers and brilliant moments. Few Hip-Hop artists can deal with family heartache and pains and make it sound so beautiful and dramatic. It is a wonderful opening and gives you everything you need to know about Loyle Carner!

Collaborations with Tom Misch (Damselfly) and Kwes. (Florence) show he can bring others into the mix without stealing focus or letting them having too much of a say. The collaborators on the album – Rebel Kleff is amazing on NO CD and No Worries – are brilliant and give Yesterday’s Gone and more rounded and community feel. It is unsurprising someone who is close to family and has that sensitivity would bring friends and allies to the record. What shines above everything else is the variation and lyrical prowess. NO CD is a swaggering, confident song that, yes, is actually does name-check C.D.s! Yesterday’s Gone is perfectly weighted so you have two incredible tracks leading and we finish with the title-track. There are fifteen tracks (on the album) but it never sounds too long and there are no fillers. The songs have their identity but hang together as a cohesive and deeply personal statement. By the end of proceedings, you get to know about Loyle Carner, his family and where he comes from – and where he intends to go. Ain’t Nothing Changed is my favourite because not only are there incredible lyrics and a powerful lead vocal but the composition is fantastic. Smooth and caramel horns run throughout and beautifully bring the song to land. I have put a couple of reviews in and, by the end of 2017; Yesterday’s Gone was in most critics’ top-ten list. An award-nominated album that got under the skin and announced this incredible talent; we were seeing this confident and confessional songwriter show his heart and soul with every line.

There were, of course, gigs and appearance after the album and Loyle Carner has been busy since January 2017. The new single, Ottolenghi, joins Carner with Jordan Rakei and, again, it is a perfect combination. I feel the lyrics of Ottolenghi are among the strongest he has ever produced and one of the most immersive stories. We hear about our hero on the train and the rain coming down; children wondering if the sun will ever come and an potentially edgy situation stemming from a misunderstanding – “They ask about the Bible I was reading/Told them that the title was misleading/Labelled it Jerusalem/but really it's for cooking Middle Eastern”. You get the image of Carner reading this cooking book – where the title of the song stems from – and people thinking he was reading something provocative and controversial. The track is about the twenty-four-year-old knowing it is easy to go back and feel lost and he looks forward and wonder whether he’ll ever raise a child. It is the Hip-Hop poet assessing life and taking stock of everything that has unfolded. This makes me wonder whether we will see another Loyle Carner album next year. The intent and drive is there and fans of Yesterday’s Gone will be intrigued to see where he goes and what comes next. His debut was about the path he has walked and his family; the mix of heartache and strength and living in a complicated world.

Given what has happened in the country – from Brexit to the Grenfell tragedy – it might give Carner impetus for songs and, whatever he comes up with, it is going to be a hotly-anticipated album. There are some promising British Hip-Hop artists around right now, including Not3s and Lady Leshurr, but there is something about Loyle Carner that stands him aside from the pack. Maybe it is the confessional style of the lyrics and the accessibility of the music that means it is easier to get involved with and suitable for all moods. I hear a lot of modern Hip-Hop and it intense a lot of the time and accusatory; it relies on phat beats and jagged electronics and does not really stretch the palette. Carner can bring in Jazz elements and homemade beats; something D.I.Y. with soothing, grand swells that give the songs fresh dimensions and nuances. This is the reason Yesterday’s Gone was taken to heart and received such praise. Loyle Carner is still, in my mind, the leader of British Hip-Hop and it is quite a lot to put on his shoulder! I am excited to see where he steps next and what his next album contains. Music needs someone like him: a truth-telling and popular artist who can unite cutting realities with poetic and elegant thoughts. On Ain’t Nothing Changed; Carner confesses that he’s “just another number”. When you look at all he has achieved and what he gives to music that assessment could not be...

8.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Loyle Carner snapped for Interview in May 2017/PHOTO CREDIT: Matt Holyoak

FURTHER from the truth.   

FEATURE: The November Playlist: Vol. 2: Julia

FEATURE:

 

The November Playlist

jj.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Julia Jacklin 

Vol. 2: Julia

 __________

IT is a good week for music…

ggoo.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: The Good, the Bad & the Queen

and the fiftieth anniversary of The Beatles’ eponymous album has been marked by stunning releases that collate demos, outtakes and the original songs in a new and shiny package. One of the standouts from The Beatles, Julia, is in my mind and connects me with a great new track from Julia Jacklin. I have included a track from The Beatles alongside Jacklin’s latest single and there are fresh offerings from Billie Marten, Muse and The Good, the Bad & the Queen; sizzling cuts from The Orielles and Drenge and something a bit calmer from Fleet Foxes. It is an amazing and varied week for new music that shows true quality and impact. In this rather uncertain and moody weather; have a seat and put on this week’s cracking new songs and let them…

oo.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: The Orielles/PHOTO CREDIT: Neelam Khan Vela

WORK their magic.

ALL PHOTOS/IMAGES (unless credited otherwise): Getty Images/Artists

___________

ja.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Nick Mckk 

Julia Jacklin - Head Alone

g.jpg

The Good, the Bad & the Queen Gun to the Head

00.jpg

The OriellesBobbi’s Second World

99.jpg

Billie Marten Blue Sea, Red Sea

dd.jpg

Drenge Bonfire of the City Boys

ii.jpg

Iceage Balm of Gilead

aaa.jpg

Anderson .Paak Who R U?

cc.jpg

CherylLove Made Me Do It

ee.jpg

Ella Vos Cast Away

fff.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Daniel Alexander Harris

Fickle FriendsBroken Sleep

ic.jpg

Ice Cube Arrest the President

bb.jpg

Benjamin Francis Leftwich Gratitude

hh.jpg

Jennifer Lopez (ft. Bad Bunny)Te Guste

ll.jpg

Little MixTold You So

sa.jpg

Sasha Sloan Older

xx.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Apple Corps Ltd

The BeatlesThe Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill (2018 Mix)

ccc.jpg

Chelsea Cutler Mess

m.jpg

MuseGet Up and Fight

lil.jpg

Lil PeepSex with My Ex

nn.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Harley Weir

These New Puritans Into the Fire

bb.jpg

Ariana Grande thank u, next

v.jpg

Conor Oberst No One Changes 

f.jpg

Foster the PeopleWorst Nites

cc.jpg

The Wombats Oceans

ll.jpg

Fleet Foxes In the Hot Hot Rays

pp.jpg

Poppy AjudhaWhen You Watch Me

ttt.jpg

TOUTSRip It Off Me

bb.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Linda Strawberry

The Smashing PumpkinsKnights of Malta

lo.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Lottie Turner

IDERMirror

GG.jpg

Gengahr Atlas Please

EEE.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Melissa Gamache

Emilie Kahn Island 

GG.jpg

Cherry Glazerr - Daddi

LL.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Warwick Baker

Laura Jean - Devotion

KKK.jpg

Kash Doll Ice Me Out

FEATURE: All the World’s a Stage: The Great (and Rather Misjudged) Examples of Actors Turning to Music

FEATURE:

 

 

All the World’s a Stage

00.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Jeff Goldblum (who has just released an album with The Mildred Snitzer Orchestra called The Capitol Studios Sessions)/PHOTO CREDIT: Pari Dukovic/Getty Images  

The Great (and Rather Misjudged) Examples of Actors Turning to Music

__________

A certain Jeff Goldblum is on my mind…

hh.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images 

and it is impossible to ignore his charm and pure allure! The man, as tall and imposing as he can seem, is that lovable figure that we cannot get over and ignore. I am not a huge buff regarding his films but have, of course, seen him in the Jurassic Park films and Independence Day. The man, rather unexpectedly, is a skilled musician (the piano especially) and has just released, with The Mildred Snitzer Orchestra, The Capitol Studios Sessions. NME, in this hot interview they conducted with him, talked to the man himself about the L.P. The interviewer tries to drill down to the nub of ‘Jeff Goldblum’ and what he encapsulates:

I’ve been trying to put my finger on exactly what Jeff Goldbluminess is ever since I listened to his debut album, ‘The Capitol Studios Sessions’. It’s a collection of jazz standards, some of which you’ll know – ‘My Baby Just Cares For Me’, ‘I Wish I Knew (How It Would Feel To Be Free)’ – and some you probably won’t. For the last few decades, Goldblum has been playing low-key jazz nights in Los Angeles with his band, the Mildred Snitzer Orchestra. Then, in October last year, he happened to be booked on The Graham Norton Show on the same day as Gregory Porter. Goldblum volunteered to accompany Porter on piano, someone at Decca Records saw it, flew to LA to see Goldblum play his regular Wednesday night gig at the Rockwell in Los Feliz, and just like that Goldblum found himself with a record deal. “I never thought of making an album, really,” he says, sincerely. “It’s all taken me by surprise.”

ss.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sarah Silverman (who appears on Jeff Golblum & The Mildred Snitzer Orchestra’s album, The Capitol Studios Sessions)/PHOTO CREDIT: Glamour

The collection does see interjections/vocals from Goldblum but, in terms of the vocals/singers; control and spotlight is handed over to people as wide-ranging as Sarah Silverman and Imelda May. With The Mildred Snitzer Orchestra; the songs through the album are accomplished and pleasant. NME described it perfectly:

“It’s the kind of album you want to play at a dinner party, which, for me, means I’ll first have to become the sort of person who organises dinner parties. It makes me want to cook for people, just so that I can do that sort of half-dance around the kitchen when you’re cooking and listening to music and sliding drawers closed with a nudge of your bum. What I’m trying to say is that listening to Jeff Goldblum’s album makes me want to be a better man. It makes me want to be suaver, more sophisticated, more like, well, Jeff Goldblum.

At the age of 14 he did something so wildly precocious that it looks now like an early example of nascent Jeff Goldbluminess. He locked himself in the family study with a copy of the Yellow Pages, and he rang up every local cocktail lounge he could find. When they answered, he would announce, in the most adult voice he could muster: “I understand you’re looking for a piano player.”

“Most of them said: ‘Who is this? We don’t even have a piano!’” he remembers. “But some of them said: ‘Not really, but we do have a piano. Do you want to come down and play it?’ So I got a couple of jobs. I was too young to be in a bar, of course, but I stuck to my task. My parents drove me to one place, and then there was a girl singer or two that I remember latching on to – without being yet, as you know ‘active’ – but just magically in proximity...

These were showbusiness girls! They said: ‘Sure, you play and I’ll drive us to the gig.’ So I accompanied some singers, much like today.”

That was the first seed of what would become the Mildred Snitzer Orchestra. Snitzer herself was a friend of Goldblum’s mother, whose name he remembered fondly years later when he came to form his band. On YouTube you can see an interview with the sprightly centenarian in which she recalls young Jeff being “very upset” that he wasn’t accepted into the local drama school, Carnegie Mellon. She credits her brother-in-law, a talent agent named Lou Snitzer, with suggesting to Goldblum that he chase his dream to New York”.

Although a lot of people will turn their noses up at an actor recording an album and calling it a vanity project; you can tell this is pure passion and something Goldblum is not doing for the sake of it. Music runs in his blood and the man took to the piano before he was ever known as an actor. The disciplines and skills he has acquired from acting – modifying himself to tackle different roles and being able to inhabit someone else – are brought into the music and bring the songs alive. I have heard the album and think it is a great thing.

It is great fun to hear Goldblum and the musicians have a ball and bring something magical out. Reviews have been largely positive and Riff Magazine have provided their impressions:

On The Capitol Studios Sessions, Goldblum turns the studio into a sophisticated club. He captures the warmness and personality of a live big band jazz performance while maintaining studio quality instrumental and vocal performances.

Much in the way Steve Martin has warmed up his audience to the world of bluegrass, Jeff Goldblum has built a not-so-secret second career of making jazz digestible to film fans.

What he and the Mildred Snitzer Orchestra have made here can be appreciated by jazz veterans and casual listeners alike. Much of that has to do with the credibility of performers like singer-songwriter Imelda May and jazz trumpeter Till Brönner.

Goldblum remains in the spotlight, singing from behind the piano. Listeners will get a taste of an authentic concert experience—from the compelling banter he includes with the entertainers he features, such as comedian Sarah Silverman.

After sitting with the hour-long album, listeners can walk away feeling as if they just received a crash course in the essential jazz Real Book—made accessible by that curious quirky attractiveness that can only be supplied by Jeff Goldblum himself”.

Jeff Goldblum is not the only actor/successful figure who has taken traditional standards and existing songs and made them their own. One could be rather snobbish regarding an actor making an album but Goldblum’s knowledge, passion and natural flair brings everything vividly into life.

Hugh Laurie, one would have thought, could not step from the acting stage to the musical one but, as he showed with Let Them Talk and Didn’t It Rain; he can take older Blues cuts and make them sound fresh and personal. Reviews for both albums (in 2011 and 2013 respectively) ranged from positive to mixed but, as a fan of Laurie’s work, I found the albums accessible and easy to understand. I am not a big Blues fan but was able to get behind Laurie’s performances and dive into that world. I would argue that, in the case of Goldblum and Laurie, they have managed to make certain styles of music more accessible to those who would overlook them normally. Each performer has their own approach to the piano and compositions but each leaves a lasting impression. I would argue Goldblum is a more charismatic performer whilst Laurie is more studied pianist and a better singer. In each case, people have been dismissive because they feel acting is where they should be – do we need actors getting into music?! Someone else who has managed to take classic songs and make them his own is Seth MacFarlane. The Family Guy creator has recorded four albums: his last, In Full Swing (2017), took songs written by the likes of Irvine Berlin and George and Ira Gershwin and MacFarlane gave them his inimitable style and sense of swagger! A wonderful vocalist and performer – a cross between Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin and the legends of Swing – it was natural he would step into music.

We know MacFarlane for his comedy and directing but, as a performer, he excels and has that natural gravitas and talent. It is always the way actors get a hard ride when they bring out albums but I have listed a few actors/comedians who have stepped into specific worlds and could have fallen flat – instead, they have triumphed and impressed critics and fans. I guess, like I said, aspects of acting and comedy is involved in music. There is that natural link between performance worlds and being able to bring something physical, character-based and chameleon-like into music. Maybe there is a science behind it but actors like Goldblum, Laurie and MacFarlane can easily transport themselves into music and sound completely in the zone. Not all attempts at actors transforming into music are a raging success. This article from The Guardian focuses on Ben Stiller’s band, Capital Punishment, and why, as he says, the 1980s group were weirdos.

Ben Stiller erupts in laughter. No, he says, down the phone from New York, he really didn’t expect to be giving an interview on this subject in 2018. It wasn’t that he forgot about the album he made with a band called Capital Punishment while at high school in 1981. He had a box of unsold vinyl copies in his house, and he would occasionally fish one out and play it to his kids. “They would really get a kick out of it; they thought it was pretty funny.” He mentioned it during an interview on the Tonight Show a few years back and the host, Jimmy Fallon, played a track, much to the hilarity of the studio audience...

gg.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Ben Stiller with his band, Capital Punishment, in 2018/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images 

The band broke up when its members went to college, and Stiller says he never really had any further musical ambitions. The closest he got was while employed as a PA for a film-maker working on a documentary about Foreigner. “I was at a studio, helping with equipment while Lou Gramm was recording the lead vocal for I Want to Know What Love Is. He went to the bathroom, and I got in front of the microphone and started pretending to sing. He walked back in and said: ‘Hey man, you look pretty good there.’ I had a brief moment where I thought: ‘This would be really cool to do.’”

He says he was “sceptical” when he heard about Sniper’s plan to rerelease the album. In fact, it had developed a minor cult following among collectors (an original copy will set you back $200 on Discogs), but was bowled over by his enthusiasm: Sniper told Roebling that his own band, Blank Dogs, had recorded music inspired by the tracks on Roadkill”.

As much as I love Ben Stiller’s work and all he has given to acting; the music on Roadkill is not going to last in the memory and I truly hope the band do not make more material and leave music as a hobby. There have been some disastrous examples of music being somewhat tarnished by an acting entering that world! I will end by naming a couple of actresses who have succeeded in music – and a female musician who has excelled in acting – but there have plenty of faulted and naff attempts at a music career…

kk.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kevin Costner on stage as part of Kevin Costner & Modern West/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Whether you see them as side-projects or fulfilling a passion, there have been many examples of actors bringing their music to the public – one wishes they shouldn’t have done. Since 2007; Kevin Costner has been performing with his own Country-Rock band, Kevin Costner & Modern West. The band have released four albums and, whilst it is interesting to see Costner in a new guise; the music is reserved, I feel, to those who like Country. That is a polite way of saying it is not able to appeal to all and, let’s be fair, Costner is probably better at acting! Although Kevin Bacon is a great actor and has been on the screen for decades; his music work with The Bacon Brothers is pretty average (at best). He has been in the band since the mid-1990s and it is another case of the music not being that striking. I don’t think Bacon feels the music will be loved by everyone and I can appreciate him pursuing a passion. It is, unfortunately, another case of an actor being best suited to the career we all know them for. The same can be said of Bruce Willis. His ‘Soul’ album, The Return of Bruno, is a dreadful thing and I have not managed to get through the whole thing. As guitarist for Hollywood Vampires; Johnny Depp has that music side-line and has been kicking around in music for a while. Alongside Aerosmith’s Joe Perry and Alice Cooper; the songs are not that bad but they are not going to trouble the best out there. Depp is a decent enough guitarist but the band themselves are no as formidable a force as their combined reputations would suggest.

Perhaps the most famous actor-turned-musician is Jared Leto. You might know him from films like Fight Club but this Oscar-winning star has been the lead of Thirty Seconds to Mars since the late-1990s. The band has released a series of albums and their latest, April’s AMERICA, was met with acclaim. The album has a political edge and is more diverse and genre-hopping than their previous albums. They document technology takeover and violence and, whilst there is confidence and standout moments, it is another album that has good moments but does not last that long in the mind. Although Leto is a fine actor; I find his vocals grating and the music of Thirty Seconds to Music has that Arena-Rock feel – it can get crowds chanting but there is not the substance and memorability you’d like. Other rather lamentable attempts at actors launching music career include Russell Crowe releasing music with the band, 30 Odd Foot of Grunts, until 2005 (they broke up, thankfully) and Jeff Bridges – although his 2011 album, Jeff Bridges, gained some good reviews and created some excitement. Whilst there have been some tragic actors-turned-musicians, Ryan Gosling, Jamie Foxx; and Michael Cera (who wowed with the solo album, True That, in 2014) show people should not have preconceptions and prejudices. It is not always actors who step into music and can prove a surprise: Lady Gaga, starring alongside Bradley Cooper in A Star Is Born, stunned with her acting ability and natural presence. Not only did Lady Gaga stun critics and make a huge impression but Cooper has shown he has quite a musical talent.

ll.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Lady Gaga attends the SAG-AFTRA Foundation's 3rd Annual Patron of the Artists Awards at the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on 8th November, 2018 in Beverly Hills, California/PHOTO CREDIT: Charley Gallay/Getty Images for SAG-AFTRA Foundation

There have been other musicians who have stepped into acting without much trouble but there are few big success stories when the reverse has been true – few long-lasting musical careers from actors, alas. In a lot of cases, actors often tackle other people’s songs and it can be hard for anyone to gain success and traction doing that, let alone an actor. The few that have written original material – like Jared Leto – have had mixed fortunes but it is a shame more actors do not take to music. If you look at Scarlett Johansson and how her music has been received, she is one of those naturals. When she released an album of Tom Waits covers (four songs written by Waits and six by Waits and his wife Kathleen Brennan) in 2008, Anywhere I Lay My Head, there were a lot of critics keen to heap praise on the actor. In 2009, she collaborated with Peter Bjorn on Break Up and showed another side. The songs were inspired by Serge Gainsbourg’s duets with Brigitte Bardot and, again, gained some great reviews. Johansson, in 2015, formed a band called the Singles with Este Haim from HAIM; Holly Miranda, Kendra Morris and Julia Haltigan. Johansson’s incredible acting abilities and smoky voice have made her a respectable figure in music and she has a natural ability. Critics will always heap criticism on actors who step into music, as I have said, and that is the case with Johansson.

Although the likes of Jeff Goldblum and Jared Leto have scored better reviews; Johansson has proven herself to be an intriguing, talented and multi-faceted singer who does not need to listen to any criticism. Another famous actor who has succeeded in music is Zooey Deschanel. Formed with M. Ward, She & Him shows Deschanel is a fantastic and compelling singer-songwriter whose music can touch millions. It is hard to categorise the duo but I guess you could call their music Indie-Pop/Indie-Folk. She & Him might be the most successful and enduring case of an actor becoming a musician. She & Him’s first album, Volume One, was a success and gained some great reviews – such as this one from AllMusic:

The occasional whistle here or slightly unconventional string arrangement there are the only traces of his usual artistry on Volume One. The rest of the time he and the band (which includes the ubiquitous Mike Mogis) create a soft, gentle feel equally inspired by the Brill Building and the Countrypolitan sound of Nashville in the late '50s. The only place the album falters is on the two covers the duo attempts. Deschanel doesn't add much to "You Really Got a Hold on Me," and Ward's backing vocals are just the kind of affected, arch singing she avoids elsewhere. Their take on the Beatles' "I Should Have Known Better" is better, but still awfully close to a novelty. The album would have been more successful without both tracks, but even with them, it stands as a nice coming out party for Deschanel. If you run screaming at the thought of singing actresses, give She & Him a chance and they might calm your fears. You may even forget the origins of the singer and simply be charmed by the singing, the songs, and the sounds found on Volume One”.

s.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

The duo have released six albums so far – 2016’s Christmas Party is the latest – and I hope there are many more records to come from Ward and Deschanel. Volume 3, released in 2013, had some covers on its but most of the tracks were written by Zooey Deschanel. She is a talented songwriter and lead and, as critics have shown, is that rare occasion when an actor can easily step into music and write their own material. I have highlighted Jeff Goldblum and mentioned actors like Hugh Laurie but Deschanel is keen to write her own stuff and not just do cover versions.

Jenny Lewis, I guess, is the only other actor I can think of who has managed to forge her own identity in music. As part of Rilo Kiley, Jenny & Johnny and Nice As Fuck; she has proven herself to be an exceptional artist whose music differs vastly from that of Zooey Deschanel. I forgot to mention another Lewis, Juliette, who is planning another album with her band, Juliette and the Licks. Jenny Lewis, as a solo artist, shines brightest in my mind. Her 2014 album, The Voyager, gained some great reviews and shows she is able to step into different guises – either solo or as a band – and succeed. Since 1999’s The Initial Friend with Rilo Kiley; Lewis has been able to prove herself as a musician and show that actors can make a successful music career.

jjjj.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Jenny Lewis on day two of Governors Ball on 7th June, 2014 on Randall's Island in New York City/PHOTO CREDIT: Eric Ryan Anderson

The Voyager, as AllMusic show, is full of great music and incredible moments:

Working primarily with producer Ryan Adams -- Beck comes aboard to give "Just One of the Guys" a narcotic sway, while Jenny collaborates with longtime partner Johnathan Rice on "Head Underwater" and "You Can't Outrun 'Em" -- Lewis indulges in the sunnier aspects of vintage yacht rock, occasionally dipping into the Laurel Canyon folk-rock she's specialized in on her own. Guitars roam wide-open spaces, couched in luxurious reverb and draped in strings; the rhythms often follow cool, steady eighth-note pulses; the surfaces always shimmer. It's such a sultry, soothing sound that it's easy to ignore the pain that lies beneath but that's a feature, not a bug: on The VoyagerLewis' characters live for today without ever thinking that the world might pass them by, and having her music flow so smooth and easy, she illustrates how easy it is to get sucked into that alluring stasis”.

I have only touched the surface of the actor-turned-musician world but, as Jeff Goldblum has an album out there; I felt it prudent to look at the ‘phenomenon’ and the rather mixed results. There have been some awful attempts – Bruce Willis and Ben Stiller – and some promising ones – Jeff Goldblum, Jared Leto and Seth MacFarlane – whilst Zooey Deschanel and Jenny Lewis have managed to showcase incredible songwriting chops and, one hopes, we will see new music from both of them next year. At the worst, an actor getting into music can be cringe-worthy but, in many cases, criticism and snob-like behaviour is premature and needless. I love Jeff Goldblum’s album, The Capitol Studios Sessions, but there are some who feel it is a step too far and a vanity venture. Regardless of what you think about the likes of Jeff Goldblum and Zooey Deschanel making albums and showing their passion for music; you cannot deny there is something wonderful and magical hearing these much-loved screen figures...

jjj.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Jeff Goldblum/PHOTO CREDIT: Pari Dukovic/Getty Images

STEPPING into music.  

FEATURE: No Prizes for Guessing... Why It Is Time for an All-Inclusive, Definitive Music Award Ceremony

FEATURE:

 

 

No Prizes for Guessing...

jj.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Jorja Smith (who won the Critics’ Choice Award at this year’s Brit Awards; in a year when the ceremony showed greatest diversity and recognition of artists outside of Pop/the mainstream but still struggled to completely escape that mould)/PHOTO CREDIT: Bella Howard for GQ

Why It Is Time for an All-Inclusive, Definitive Music Award Ceremony

__________

WHETHER you feel music awards are a valid and essential…

m.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sam Smith, winner of Record of the Year and Song of the Year for Stay with Me, Best Pop Vocal Album for In the Lonely Hour and Best New Artist poses in the press room during The 57th Annual Grammy Awards at the STAPLES Center on 8th February. 2015 in Los Angeles, California/PHOTO CREDIT: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images 

dynamic of the music industry; many are of the same opinion: there are few ceremonies and options that provide that true credibility and unity. I am reading pieces regarding black artists who often do not get recognition beyond genre-specific - Grime and Rap, for example – awards and, when it comes to the mainstream options, how many minority artists are included? I guess it is improving and you are seeing artists like Stormzy and Cardi B getting nods and gongs. The Grammys has been criticised for its lack of racial inclusion regarding the top prizes. There are, again, efforts to be more inclusive and considered but it seems, for the most part, the biggest award shows are dominated by particular races and styles. Pop still rules the roost whereas Rock and Indie have taken a back-seat; the mainstream gets more of a say and there isn’t, in my mind, that award show that goes all the way and covers all the bases. You might say that award shows are all about hubris and ego; giving artists due and putting them in the spotlight. There is little point to recording music if there is not that chance of winning awards and having a special moment. Actors, as much as they’d say otherwise, would love to win an Oscar or BAFTA and, again, there is that talk of racial exclusion and imbalance. The work itself is good enough and real value comes in terms of influence and touching fans.

k.jpeg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Katy Perry/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Awards are not the be all and end all of everything but, for most, it is something to work towards and can be more instructive and direct that critical exposure. If you want to know which album or artist is the best of the year; there is that sense of guideline and consensus. Regarding that last point; one of the issues that has come into voting and award shows is the accusations of rigging. Last year, Katy Perry came out and accused award shows of being fixed:

Her openness is a huge part of her new on- and offstage persona, one that she’s been building ever since her political awakening in the fall, and has carried over into her subsequent musical endeavors. In a new profile for the New YorkTimes, Perry also shared some sharp comments on the music industry’s top honors that helped give her a platform.

“All the awards shows are fake,” she told the Times, “and all the awards that I’ve won are fake.” She continued on to call awards “constructs,” suggesting that they don’t have audiences’ true tastes in mind.

Perry has been the recipient of a litany of awards in her blockbuster pop career, including prizes from the American Music Awards, Billboard Music Awards, MTV Video Music Awards, People’s Choice Awards, Teen Choice Awards, and many more. She has not yet, however, nabbed a Grammy, although she performed “Chained to the Rhythm” at that show’s 2017 event”.

br.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images 

I recall the Grammys being accused of ignoring black artists and awarding artists with the biggest record label. You do wonder if there is a pre-arranged deal with the huge labels regarding their talent and giving them awards. I am not suggesting all award shows operate that way but most of the big winners are looked after by the major labels. Not only are accusations being levied at U.S. awards; here in the U.K., The Brit Awards have been accused of bias and problems:

Despite celebratory moments, the 2018 BRITs came under scrutiny for a voting mishap regarding the award for British Video of the Year. On Twitter, popular British girl group Little Mix were winning by a landslide and were head to head with 3 former One Direction members. Until the very last second when the polls closed, Little Mix were still on the list as being at the #1 spot thus supposedly earning them the award.

After a few minutes, the winner was revealed to be Harry Styles and his video for Sign of the Times. Fans became outraged and some quickly posted multiple screenshots proving the girl groups’ win on Twitter.

This isn’t the first time the BRITs have been accused of rigging awards. Two decades ago when the Spice Girls were at the top and Spicemania was flourishing, the quintet lost the award for British Group to the Manic Street Preachers. The winner for British Group has been purely male-dominated since its inception back in 1977”.

k.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kendrick Lamar (whose album, DAMN, missed out on the Album of the Year Grammy this year to Bruno Mars’ 24K Magic)/PHOTO CREDIT: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images  

I admit The Brit Awards is one of the few mainstream events that has diversified through the years. Recognising more women, black artists and broadening its genre scope; despite a few Pop-bias winners, it was a more eclectic and credible ceremony than in years previous. Away from the calls of label corruption and rigging; there are other considerations that need to be explored. The MOBOs are endangered because of lack of popularity/sponsorship and this has always been a place where black artists could get their dues and props. Look at the appeal of The Brit Awards and does it hold the same sway and controversy – the raucous and riotous getting into the press – as years past?! The Grammys have always faced criticism regarding genre-bias and ignoring true calibre; there are award shows for specific genres like Country and Grime but there is a lot of division. Look at something like The Oscars and you have this long night that recognises those behind the scenes and people that normally don’t make the red carpet press delirious. The Welsh Music Prize has just been awarded to Boy Azooga for the sensational 1,2, Kung Fu! The award show came about because of a lack of recognition for Welsh/Welsh-speaking artists and was discovered by Huw Stephens. Away from race, bias and language; there is always that thing regarding genre and how big award shows choose their nominees. This year’s Mercury Prize was won by Wolf Alice and, again, there were some shocked faces.

w.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Wolf Alice (after winning the 2018 Mercury Prize for Visions of a Life)/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Another London-based winner – after Sampha won in 2017 -; their Visions of a Life album walked away with the prize. There were hopes Nadine Shah would win (a norther artist with Muslim heritage) but she was denied. Although it was not a commercial sell-out, there was the feeling the public favourite was denied. I have long-since stopped getting excited about The Brit Awards and Mercury build-up. I feel like there are some interesting possibilities but, too often, there are missed opportunities and oversights. The Mercury panel failed to shortlist any real Folk or Country acts; not a lot of Soul or R&B and, for the most part, there was some safety. The final part of the award ceremony issue is recognition underground/rising talent as opposed those who we all know about and have won awards before. Again, when you look at the Mercury Prize and wonder whether artists could have been left out – Lily Allen and Noel Gallagher – and others (such as Let’s Eat Grandma and Shame) included. There are always going to be unpopular decisions regarding nominees and the way awards go but I feel, too often, labels and panels are responsible. There are public-nominated music awards but most of what is dished out is decided by a narrow focus. Awards are a great incentive for artists and, when they come with a cash prize, it can give that extra boost for a new artist.

let.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Let’s Eat Grandma (who missed out on the shortlist for this year’s Mercury Prize for their album, I’m All Ears)/PHOTO CREDIT: Jenn Five  

Great albums and labels deserve gongs and it seems there are lots of big awards – all courting their fair share of criticism – and smaller shows that are underappreciated and under-funded. It seems like there is an easy option to overcome all the hurdles: get this one-for-all and inclusive award show that would allow public voting and less grumbling. It would be impossible to unite all genres and categories – as you’d be there all night – but, like the Academy Awards; maybe having more categories and giving things variation. You could have a special category for Welsh-language and Scotland; be more open-minded regarding black artists and what they bring to music and, when it comes to the best album of the year, have that public input. Either that or do genre-specific album prizes or have a tournament regarding voting – all albums are listed and they are whittled down to the final four/six on the night. Without having labels pulling strings and any accusations of rigging; it would be a chance for small labels to win awards and rising artists to get their due. You could have music video options and recognise producers, engineers and D.J.s. Not only could you include award shows – and artists from them – like the MOBOS and The Brit Awards (and the Grammys), but shine a light on upcoming artists who never get a look-in.

I feel like the BBC should lead an initiative like this and often wonder why BBC Radio 6 Music do not have their own award show. They could perfectly orchestrate an award show that cured the problems regarding genre, gender and racial exclusion. The American Music Awards were held recently and, as you can see from this BBC piece; the night was dominated by Pop and white artists. I feel like there is that appetite for music awards, and always will be, but too many are dogged by narrowness, commercialism and that desirable musical commodity: the clean and white artist. Are music award shows relevant and worth anything in this day and age?! I discovered an article from Vice that asked the question and looks at issues that are not only affecting the music industry but Hollywood:

The award show season has long been caught in this odd cultural situation. People like Madonna—or Kevin Hart, or Tiffany Haddish—are often employed to orchestrate some online buzz, which likely couldn’t be achieved without them. Over the last few years, amid an aggressively declining viewership, award shows have struggled, and ultimately failed, to arrive at a fraction of the cultural importance they once had. (There was a time when just having a nomination was enough generate more revenue.) These efforts, admittedly, have been valiant: in late June, the Recording Academy opened its “General Field” category—which includes the Record, Song, and Album of the Year awards—from five to eight nominees; last month, Sandra Oh became the first Asian woman to be nominated for an Emmy as lead actress in a drama series; and recently, the Oscars announced it would introduce some 900 new members into the Academy to diversify its voting body...

ll.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @landall/Unsplash 

But these measures have also, on the other hand, served to affirm the presence of a widening gap between art and commerce. The two leading films at the Oscars this year, The Shape of Water (which won Best Picture, Best Director, Best Score, and Best Production Design) and Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri (which won Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor) were certainly not the best films in the race. The former is, at its core, a conventional romance flick—one that can just barely pass, if you squint your eyes enough, as an allegory for something else. Its situation in the 1960s (and its use of a black woman custodian as a foil character) is all that gives it any political weight. And then there is Billboards, which is—to be polite—altogether an incredibly racist film.

For the most part, award shows, as Carrie Battan wrote last year, seem to exist for the sole purpose of reinforcing antiquated ideas of what art—in an era of ultimate sociopolitical turmoil and pandemonium—is supposed to be: polite, conventional, and, most importantly, white”.

One main contributor to the decline of award shows – with the likes of the MOBOs resting for a year – is that thing with oversaturation. There are so many music award options that you are only ever going to be interested in the odd one. With most people getting a bit tired of the variety of awards out there; is it now time to vanquish the smaller, more predictable options and assimilate into this all-conquering, all-inclusive option? Maybe it would still see people sigh but it would only be the ONE show – you’d sit through maybe a few hours or so – and you could bring in little bits of music documentaries; some great live performances and have this interactive, uncontroversial option.

l.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Lady Leshurr at the 2016 MOBO Awards/PHOTO CREDIT: PA Images

It seems, quite rightly, there is a malaise and fatigue regarding award shows and the sheer number out there! The Guardian explored this earlier in the year:

 “With viewers switching off, is it any surprise that the Mobo organisation has cancelled this year’s bash, claiming to be “regrouping” for a better outing in 2019? Or that the Oscars’ organisers want to add a prize for “popular film” because low ratings must be down to plebeian viewers unable to comprehend a Churchill biopic, rather than because they put out a three-hour show, 70% of which is strangers thanking strangers.

If you are tiring of all these dos, you are not alone. The sheer number of ceremonies is causing something of a crisis in the tuxedo-wearing community. In the past year, viewing figures have been down for almost every big awards show, with the Oscars, Grammys and Video Music Awards all drawing some of their lowest audiences ever. Last week’s Emmys was supposed to be a chance for renewal, with Saturday Night Live producer Lorne Michaels drafted in to give the show razzle dazzle. In the end it was another ratings flop, and jokes bombed so badly it seemed as though the audience was taking part in a mass choral rendition of John Cage’s 4’33”. The only respite came from an onstage proposal from the winner of best director of a variety special. It was touching, but distracted from the fact that he was winning an Emmy for directing the Oscars. If award shows are, at the best of times, a circle jerk, surely the Emmys giving an Emmy to the Oscars is closer to one of Lennon and McCartney’s myopic self-pleasure sessions”.

999.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @elishavision/Unsplash 

Have a look here and you can see the sheer wealth and range of music award shows. You might not be able to accommodate everything and include everything into a single night but there is a great opportunity to provide something more diverse, quality-controlled and yet something that also recognises those often overlooked and cast aside. From British artists outside of London to women and black musicians; entire genres and getting the voting sorted so it is not influenced by big labels – there is a lot that can be done and I think, if done right, there would be this definitive and properly-god music award show! I would love to see it happen but it does not seem like anyone is initiating change and this evolution. Artists do not only make albums for fans and themselves: there is that desire to produce something exceptional and, alongside that, have it recognised through awards and celebration. That sort of boost and recognition gives impetus to others and for that band/artist; they are then spurred on and have that sense of achievement. I am seeing too many people ignored and entire sections of the music community being relegated or having to set up their own award shows. As we get used to the complaints regarding British award shows and the fixing of U.S. ones; the sheer dominance of white Pop artists; one has to ask whether this independent yet fierce opponent could give a home to everyone and be seen as this equal and reactive.

bb.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: BBC/Getty Images

I would like to see this change and feel a big station/organisation like BBC Radio 6 Music could lead the charge. With events and initiatives like BBC Introducing providing special shows and discussions relating to various sides of music – how to get into the industry and how to deal with mental-health issues – it seems like the award show is at the other end of the spectrum. It is that peak where an artist can look back at their start and be acknowledged for something incredible. Given the very few award ceremonies that tend to please and unite music fans; I feel we need to make a change and bring that improvement. The award show would not demand people dress in fancy clobber and it would not be a chance for bigwigs and huge labels to clean up. It would be an impressive and diverse show that would help to reverse many of the problems existing and give recognition to artists who, normally, toil in anonymity. I am not sure which big music award show comes next but I am not holding my breath or getting too excited about it. I used to love so many aspects of music – including award shows and the charts – but that enthusiasm has waned. I have not given up on the music award ceremony and feel that, with an overhaul and this new inspiration, we could launch something that could please everyone and be free...

kk.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Adele was one of the big winners at the 2017 Grammys/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

FROM controversy.  

FEATURE: Sisters in Arms: An All-Female, Autumn-Ready Playlist (Vol. XVII)

FEATURE:

 

 

Sisters in Arms

MOLL.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Molly Rainford 

An All-Female, Autumn-Ready Playlist (Vol. XVII)

__________

WE are moving more into autumn…

MM.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Magnetic Heaven 

and the weather is getting cooler and less sure! I am excited for Christmas and the winter months but the weather is something that always gets to me. The shortening days and cooler nights are not great and the rain/wind is a problem; having to wrap up warmer and not being able to go out all of the time. Regardless of the iffy conditions and the darkening days; I have compiled a list of female-led tracks that should get the blood temperature raised and get inside the heart. It is a confident and eclectic mix that will get the heat going and provide plenty of comfort. Have a look at the playlist and I am sure there are some songs in there that will get you in the mood. Autumn might be here but, with great female-fronted music out there; it is never going to be a boring or quiet one. Take a listen, sit back and enjoy...

aaa.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Ari Lennox 

SOME fantastic tunes.  

ALL PHOTOS (unless stated otherwise): Getty Images/Artists

____________

jj.jpg

Jenn Morel - Kumbara

22.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Etienne Gilfillan

Lisa KnappMaria Marten

mm.jpg

Moscow ApartmentOrange

ll.jpg

Ari LennoxGrampa

ee.jpg

Emily BreezeLimousines

dd.jpg

Donna Missal Skyline

jj.jpg

Shayna LeighJustified

ll.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @katrina_burgoyne

Lisa McHughOut of Heaven

CC.jpg

Catherine McGrathWild (Acoustic)

EEE.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Chad Kamenshine

Elena GoddardWish U Weren’t Here

KK.jpg

Kash DollIce Me Out

TTTT.jpg

TrinaRedemption

WWW.jpg

Ward ThomasNo Fooling Me

OO.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Neelam Khan Vela

The OriellesBobbi’s Second World         

655.jpg

Magnetic HeavenFeel It Right

SSSAA.jpg

Stacey KaniukGive Up the Ghost

DA.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @anthonyconwayphotography

Dani SylviaLove Me Good

CCCX.jpg

Molly RainfordI Like You

I.jpg

Lisa EkdahlMore of the Good

SS.jpg

Suzi WuGrim Reaper

FF.jpg

Fightmilk Your Girlfriend

Dh9yy40XcAEDuKt.jpg

BinkyGet Lost

DqIvEEeVYAAyVwj.jpg

Ashley TisdaleVoices in My Head

br.jpg

Bryony DunnMonochrome

eee.jpg

Emily KingLook at Me Now

ccl.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Angel Wade 

Clara BondI’m on Fire

NA.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Ray Lego

Natalie PrassSisters

FEATURE: Love Thru a Lens: The Perils of High-Profile Relationships in Music

FEATURE:

 

 

Love Thru a Lens

99.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Cheryl in a promotional shot for her new single, Love Made Me Do It (out 09/11)/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images 

The Perils of High-Profile Relationships in Music

__________

THE reason I have chosen Cheryl…

ccc.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Cheryl (then Cheryl Fernandez-Versini) pictyred with Liam Payne in 2016/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images 

as a sort of ‘cover star’ is because she is making the news right now. Following her split with Liam Payne; it seems the days of dating are being put on the back burner:

Cheryl has said her love life is "not happening any more" in her first interview since splitting with Liam Payne.

The former Girls Aloud singer is set to release new music on Friday and spoke to fellow musician Jessie Ware for her podcast Table Manners.

Cheryl said: "In business I know what I want, but in my romantic area I'm not as evolved - that area has stopped."

She also spoke about Bear, her 20-month-old son with Payne.

The artist formerly known as Cheryl Fernandez-Versini, Cole and Tweedy said: "I've got the man in my life now. I'm good."

The 35-year-old also spoke about releasing her first song in four years, Love Made Me Do It, which was written with her former Girls Aloud bandmate Nicola Roberts.

She was asked about her split from Payne and whether her new music – her latest single, Love Made Me Do It, is out tomorrow – was referencing him:

"All the music and the songs were done way before we split," she said.

"None of them are about anybody. That's the easiest thing you could write, it's such an easy headline.

"When I'm in a room, I'm not sat there with other writers thinking about somebody.

"We may talk about one subject and it comes out that way, but I wasn't writing a love poem to anybody."

The singer said she had taken a decision to change her life in recent years, saying she was "jaded and living in a negative space" after spending much of her life in the spotlight”.

Whilst it seems some well-timed music will not do her commercial any harm – there is likely to be that extra intrigue regarding her new material – it seems the life of an artist is hard enough without bringing love into things. I know a lot of well-known musicians and figures who are in relationships with less-known (normal) people and there is not the same sort of intrigue and leering from the press. Even if you are someone like Ellie Goulding, Ed Sheeran or their like; there are not going to be the same amount of paparazzi at your door if you are dating someone quite ordinary – consider those high-profile bonds and how much more pressure comes with them. The same happens with actors. If you have two A-listers in love; that sends everyone into a storm and their lives will never be the same again; there is always that speculation and focus. Musicians are not quite as appealing as actors when it comes to the high-profiles bonds but it seems like there their private lives end pretty quickly. I know Cheryl lives a fairly quiet life but since she started dating Payne (and had a child with him) there has been that fever of press obsession and she has been thrust into focus. Maybe some artists can worsen a problem – big magazine covers posing with their other halves hardly deters and dampens that press intrigue – but it seems even having a normal and stable life is a unlikely.

54.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @mvs_berlin/Unsplash

In this case, who knows the exact cause of the breakup. Maybe there were the pressures of two different careers or Payne not being as interested in family as his own interests. In any case; it seems that there is no real difference when you compare acting and music. If you have these two big artists, there will always be the lens out. People will scrutinise songs and pick through every line; wonder whether lyrics are about their lover and, when things go sour, whether the songs that follow document that. The life of an artist these days is tough enough and I know so many (unsigned artists) that avoid relationships because they fear the lack of commitment and time they have will render things null. You are on the road a lot and there are numerous demands; promotion is constant and the energy levels flag. I have mooted, before, the possibility of having a bespoke dating service for artists...sort of like a Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club-style pun/name that, in all seriousness, would make it easier for artists to find someone suited to them. In Cheryl’s case; I do not think she will swear off men forever – even if her son, Bear, does come first – but dating someone else in the industry is likely to get the press swarming around her door like flies on sh*t. The attention would still be there if she dated someone outside of music but one feels the level of intrusion and focus would not be as severe.

mm.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Guy Ritchie and Madonna (the couple divorced in 2008)

From Madonna and Chris Martin through to Cheryl – I know the first two dated actors/directors but they were both famous (Guy Ritchie and Gwyneth Paltrow respectively) -; it is always a lot more testing and challenging when you join two big stars. Think of some of the big-name couples in music that have survived the test of time such as Jay-Z and Beyoncé and it seems their success and stability is a rarity. Granted, that relationship has been put through the spotlight. Many felt Beyoncé’s 2016 album, Lemonade, was talking about Jay-Z and rumours of infidelity. There was a moment you felt they would split but, now, they seem stronger than ever and perform as part of a duo, The Carters. I suppose any sort of indiscretion and cheating will naturally go into one artist’s work and, when you consider the other will release music, the press and fan attention heightens and it can boil over. It is a problem and curse as old as time itself but I wonder whether that high-profile relationship can ever last. There have been survivors and successes but there have been so many more disasters and short-term bonds. When things do break; that can result in a series of petty songs where each artist takes shots at the other and, before you know it, things have truly unravelled. One artist who has faced a lot of unwanted attention and unhappiness regarding her relationships is Ariana Grande.

bb.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Jay-Z and Beyoncé/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

When she was dating Mac Miller; there was this sense of togetherness that stemmed from a rather sweet and humble beginnings and, after Miller’s death earlier this year, some blamed Grande for that and felt she contributed somehow. There were compelling enough reasons why the two broke up and the fact Ariana Grande misses him so much – a reason tweet from her shows that pain – means they managed to stay friends after the split. Earlier this year, a couple of months before Mac Miller died; news of their breakup was reported in the press:

Ariana Grande and Mac Miller's love story began with a tweet, then a friendship built from their early collaborations -- first, "Baby It's Cold Outside," then with the infectious hit "The Way" -- before a full-fledged romance blossomed.

However, that all came crashing down on May 10, when Ariana confirmed the news of her split from Mac in a post on her Instagram Stories. "This is one of my best friends in the whole world and favorite people on the planet,” Grande wrote above a photo of them cuddling and smiling. “I respect and adore him endlessly and am grateful to have him in my life in any form, at all times regardless of how our relationship changes or what the universe holds for each of us!”

Naturally, the news of Ariana and Mac's split didn't sit well with fans, as heartbreak and crying emojis have since flooded the artists' Instagram comment section. Mac, who had a run-in with the law earlier this month and was charged with drunk driving and hit-and-run, has remained mum on all of his socials, while Ariana has been prepping her upcoming album following the release of her new song "No Tears Left To Cry".

66.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Mac Miller and Ariana Grande/PHOTO CREDIT: GC Images

You could argue artists should date those outside of the profession to avoid easy breakups or having quite as much attention from the media. That is fair enough but in many cases it is the similarities they have and that common bond that brings them together. I am likely to be drawn more to someone in music as opposed to someone who wasn’t. It is that sense of compatibility that leads to a relationship and, often, can end it. A lot of the time, the pressures and time demands of music can lead to breakup and problems in a relationship. Musicians are among the busiest around and, when you are traveling so much and wrapped up in a new release, where does the relationship rank? We all get a little bit more interested when we see two well-known artists date and, of course, there is that glitz and glamour that comes with it. A lot times, that endless glare and sense of encroachment can spell the end to even the most secure of relationships – or mean any problems are exposed quicker and, in turn, that adds fuel to the fire. Most of the big Pop names around, at some point, have dated someone quite high-profile and a lot of times one wonders whether the relationship is quite calculated – a ploy for more commercial appeal or something that will generate them that hollow fame.

b.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: @wbayreuther/Unsplash

In a lot of instances, there is that un-cynical and natural affection that, if they were in most other industries, would continue to grow and survive. It is not the case every high-profile musical bond will end in flames and be a disaster but I always worry when I see big artists dating and whether they can ever be left alone. Creative and personal lives entwine and it can go bad. Social media can make things so much worse. For every ‘success’ story like that of Beyoncé and Jay-Z, there are these relationships that seem promising but, before long, are over. Love and relationships are the common stock for artists and some of music’s greatest moments have come from pure and content times. I am not down on musicians dating one another but there are obvious traps and obstacles that can trip them up sooner or later. That always present media lens is out and, wherever they go, it seems somebody wants something from them. The natural demands of the music lifestyle can cause their own strains and, if they are two quite prominent and mainstream artists, then that adds another layer of strain to the party. Maybe breakups can breed creative lust and success but the aftermath and realisations are pretty stark and harsh. Maybe Cheryl will date another musician/musical figure soon but it seems family life is more important. A new album and a clearer head has come in and there are new goals on her horizon. Away from all the upset and press intrusion; sometimes that high-profile breakup can result...

656.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: @shadex_bona/Unsplash  

IN something quite positive.

FEATURE: Many Shades of White: Why The Beatles’ Self-Titled Album Is a Great Test for Modern Artists

FEATURE:

 

 

Many Shades of White

fd.jpeg

IN THIS PHOTO: The Beatles photoed in 1968 (top-left: John Lennon, top-right: Paul McCartney; bottom-left: George Harrison, bottom-right: Ringo Starr)/PHOTO CREDIT: Apple Records/Getty Images 

Why The Beatles’ Self-Titled Album Is a Great Test for Modern Artists

__________

I was watching a great live stream on YouTube

that collected together a panel of great music minds who were discussing The Beatles’ fiftieth anniversary. Also known as ‘The White Album’; a fiftieth anniversary collection is available that has the original songs remastered and mixed by Giles Martin – the son of The Beatles’ producer, Sir George Martin – and the famous ‘Esher demos’ – Esher (Surrey) is where the band converged to record these demos, in George Harrison’s bungalow. Alongside all of this is a full and frank written account of the album, some rare outtakes and all the goodness you could want. It has been lovingly put together by Giles Martin and his team and, as I shall talk about later; it perfectly brings this fifty-year-old collection of songs to the modern time without sacrificing its authentic sound and purity. That is a hard job to do and one Martin has done with aplomb. Before looking ahead and why the fiftieth anniversary collection will open modern eyes; a look back at the album and what was happening at the time:

Recording sessions for the White Album started with the song Revolution on May 30, 1968, and concluded with take three of Julia on October 13, 1968. Mixing was completed five days later on October 18, 1968. Recorded mostly at Abbey Road Studios, with some sessions at Trident Studios. Although productive, the sessions were reportedly undisciplined and sometimes fractious, and took place at a time when tensions were growing within the group.

Concurrent with the recording of this album, The Beatles were launching their new multimedia business corporation Apple Corps, an enterprise that proved to be a source of significant stress for the band. Also recorded during the White Album sessions were What’s the New Mary Jane and Not Guilty. These two tracks were only available on bootlegs for many years, but were finally released for the first time 28 years after they were recorded on Anthology 3 in 1996…

Despite the album’s official title, which emphasized group identity, studio efforts on The Beatles captured the work of four increasingly individualized artists who frequently found themselves at odds. The band’s work pattern changed dramatically with this project, and by most accounts the extraordinary synergy of The Beatles’ previous studio sessions was harder to come by during this period. Sometimes McCartney would record in one studio for prolonged periods of time, while Lennon would record in another, each man using different engineers. At one point in the sessions, George Martin, whose authority over the band in the studio had waned, spontaneously left to go on holiday, leaving Chris Thomas in charge of producing. During one of these sessions, while recording Helter Skelter, Harrison reportedly ran around the studio while holding a flaming ashtray above his head.

 

The sessions for The Beatles were notable for the band’s formal transition from 4-track to 8-track recording. As work on this album began, Abbey Road Studios possessed, but had yet to install, an 8-track machine that had supposedly been sitting in a storage room for months. This was in accordance with EMI’s policy of testing and customizing new gear, sometimes for months, before putting it into use in the studios. The Beatles recorded Hey Jude and Dear Prudence at Trident Studios in central London, which had an 8-track recorder. When they found out about EMI’s 8-track recorder they insisted on using it, and engineers Ken Scott and Dave Harries took the machine (without authorization from the studio chiefs) into the Number 2 recording studio for the group to use… 

The resulting tracks did not have the same sound as previous Beatles albums had. Thinking that something was wrong with the sound of EMI’s new 3M 8-Track machine (see left), they asked to have a technician check the factory calibration of the machine. The technician using a calibration tape showed the recording engineers that nothing was wrong with the machine, that it was calibrated perfectly to factory standards. The recording engineers were stymied — until they were told by industry professionals that the previous mixing boards at EMI had been valve (US English: tube) powered boards making the earlier Beatles albums sound different. The new mixing boards were the culprit – not the new 3M 8-Track recording machine. It, therefore, took some time before the EMI engineers were able to get the quality of sound they wanted using these transistorized mixing consoles. The EMI engineers were finally able to get the same quality of sound of eariler Beatles albums on Abbey Road”.

There has been a lot of debate, at the time and later on, whether The Beatles should have been a single album and not the double we all see. This article from The Beatles Bible collects the opinions of a couple of Beatles and Sir George Martin:

After Sgt Pepper changed the world, the world keenly awaited The Beatles' next step. They had released just the six-track Magical Mystery Tour EP and the Lady Madonna single since then, and there was widespread speculation in the press that they were a spent force.

While recording the album, the group was in the process of launching the multimedia business Apple Corps, while coping with various upheavals including drug busts, changing relationships and substance abuse.

 

The Beatles were old hands at dealing with such pressure. They turned away from the elaborate excesses of Sgt Pepper, recording instead a simple collection of 30 songs under an even simpler name: The Beatles.

George Martin later claimed he had wanted the group to omit the album's weaker songs and focused instead on producing a solid single-disc release.

I thought we should probably have made a very, very good single album rather than a double. But they insisted. I think it could have been made fantastically good if it had been compressed a bit and condensed. A lot of people I know think it's still the best album they made. I later learnt that by recording all those songs they were getting rid of their contract with EMI more quickly.

George Martin
Anthology

Ringo Starr agreed with the sentiment.

There was a lot of information on the double album, but I agree that we should have put it out as two separate albums: the 'White' and the 'Whiter' albums.

Ringo Starr
Anthology

Despite its faults as a collection, Paul McCartney stood by the album, saying that the wide variety of songs was a major part of its appeal.

I think it was a very good album. It stood up, but it wasn't a pleasant one to make. Then again, sometimes those things work for your art. The fact that it's got so much on it is one of the things that's cool about it. The songs are very varied. I think it's a fine album…

 

I don't remember the reaction. Now I release records and I watch to see who likes it and how it does. But with The Beatles, I can't ever remember scouring the charts to see what number it had come in at. I assume we hoped that people would like it. We just put it out and got on with life. A lot of our friends liked it and that was mainly what we were concerned with. If your mates liked it, the boutiques played it and it was played wherever you went – that was a sign of success for us.

Paul McCartney
Anthology”
.

Sir George Martin died two years ago but I think he would be very proud and pleased with Giles’ work on the fiftieth anniversary work. This article gives you a numerical guide to The Beatles but, so far, the reviews for the remastered anniversary releases has been positive. Ultimate Classic Rock gave their views:

And from the sound of the double White Album, George HarrisonJohn LennonPaul McCartney and Ringo Starr were indeed going their own ways. The 30 songs often unfold like solo tracks with various Beatles sitting in as sidemen with whoever was taking lead on a particular song.

That's why the seven-disc The Beatles (White Album) Super Deluxe is such a revelation at times: They sound like a band working together to create one of rock's all-time greatest LPs. There are some solo excursions here – especially on the stripped-down disc of "Esher Demos" that find the Fab Four testing out their new songs for each other – but there's also plenty of old-school camaraderie as the group works out old songs, new songs and songs that would sit in the vaults for years”…

 

The studio sessions are like that, offering selected glimpses into how the Beatles got from here to there. Sometimes it's just an instrumental backing track to "Back in the U.S.S.R."; other times it's an early acoustic version of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" that's just a little less majestic than the one you know. And occasionally there's something jaw-droppingly awesome like that 10-minute "Revolution 1" that reveals sections that eventually found their way into the audio collage on "Revolution 9."

So, in that sense, the 27 "Esher Demos" included here are both the springboard to this set and its centerpiece, even as they reinforce the notion that the four Beatles were moving their separate ways. Early, skeletal versions of songs like "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" and "Happiness Is a Warm Gun" got big boosts in the studio when the entire band chipped in, but they're still fascinating and tuneful as acoustic pieces.

Still, these early demos don't mean as much without the finished record. Half a century later, the White Album remains one of the Beatles' greatest, influential and definitive works. You'll appreciate it even more after hearing this Super Deluxe box, which chronicles the LP's inception while furthering its case for such an esteemed place in music history. After all these years, it doesn't sound like the end, but rather a new beginning”.

 

I have chatted a lot about the background and sort of left the article on a cliff-hanger. I was, as I said at the top, watching the YouTube video where Matt Everitt (BBC Radio 6 Music) and Giles Martin spoke about the new release and dissected the songs. Joining them on a panel was Miles Kane and Andy Bell (Ride); Georgie Rogers (BBC Radio 6 Music, Soho Radio), Felix White (The Maccabees) and Dan Stubbs (NME). They gave their views regarding the album and why it is so special; how it has translated through the past five decades and why it remains so special. The consensus was – and will be for most other people – that the sheer eclectic range of the records means you are picking up new elements and reveals this far along. Songs fall in and out of favour and, unlike some Beatles albums; The Beatles holds a strong and loyal position in their all-time top-five. It was a great discussion and I learned a lot – from Martin and the guests – regarding the songs’ beauty and how the material came together. The fact most of the material was laid onto a 4-track – there was an 8-track but the guys wanted a simpler and less rigorous sound than on Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band -  is amazing! Thirty songs on four sides (on vinyl that is; or a single sitting/skimming on Spotify); it is a masterful album that, despite some rougher cuts, amazed critics and resonated profoundly.

9999999999.jpg

 IN THIS IMAGE: The Beatles (and Yoko Ono) depicted in their 1968/The Beatles period/IMAGE CREDIT: Ken Lowe

I guess two myths/quibbles need to be got out of the way before I look to the future. One, as discussed last night, was this notion that The Beatles was a band in disarray and chaos. It is true Sir George Martin was at-odds with Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr (sirs both); George Harrison and John Lennon because, in terms of recording and the way it was being produced; he was used to a different style. The Beatles was a completely different experience to that of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Gone was the ruthless perfectionism and all-night sessions mining the studio for fresh secrets: replacing it was a band being a band; looser and willing to put the songs together in their own time. Whilst George Martin (I’ll drop the knighthood from now onward, if that is okay) was unhappy with the experience and felt it should have been a single album; what remains and we have is glorious. I do not feel you can whittle down a double-album as captivating as colourful as The Beatles because it is a long listen. The Telegraph mooted a single album and highlighted faults.

“...But where that 1967 masterpiece sounds unified, The Beatles (to give The White Album its official title) is fractured, its disparate pieces flying off in different directions. It is the sound of The Beatles falling apart.

Still, if you think the original White Album’s sprawling, wait until you hear about the forthcoming six-CD Deluxe edition, which adds 27 early acoustic demos and 50 session takes to the album’s original 30 tracks. As a tonic to that, let’s consider a shorter version. reducing The White Album’s 30 tracks (31 if you include Can You Take Me Back?, uncredited on the sleeve or label) to... how many, exactly? Fan site beatlesbible.com says 14 tracks is the “standard rule”. The White Album aside, six of The Beatles’ other 10 albums released in the UK had 14 tracks. So 14 it is. And like a diligent maths pupil, I’m going to show my workings...

 

An easier omission is Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-DaPaul McCartney placed rocket boosters under already existing inter-band tensions by his insistence that the group spend two days playing Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da over and over again. It’s a banal ditty that exemplifies what Lennon derided as “Paul’s granny music”. But McCartney was convinced it was a hit. He was right, it was – the band Marmalade took their contemporaneous cover version to number one. But I think we can live without it on our leaner White Album.

Same goes for Honey Pie, a less egregious example of Paul’s granny music, but nevertheless a novelty item. We tolerated When I’m 64, Paul, because it seemed psychedelic on Sgt Pepper, coming straight after Within You Without You. We quite enjoyed Your Mother Should Know from Magical Mystery Tour (the double EP released in 1967 a few months after Sgt Pepper). But while we can admire McCartney's mastery of pre-war pop stylings, he's testing our patience with this one, and it hasn’t “hit the big time

Meanwhile Birthday has not supplanted Happy Birthday to You as an anniversary anthem, and McCartney’s Why Don’t We do it in the Road?, while enjoyably crude, is not a major work. Nor is Lennon’s Everybody’s Got Something to Hide Except for Me and My Monkey. The primate in question may have been heroin, though the track’s exuberance suggests Lennon can’t have been taking too much of it at that stage”.

Apart from Back in the USSR, Helter Skelter and Happiness Is a Warm Gun; most of Jon Dennis’ selected fourteen have a calmer and more tranquil mood.

I contest there are a few songs I pass by – including George Harrison’s Piggies and Paul McCartney’s Rocky Raccoon – but each track holds its place. You could not do a single album because there is a subjectiveness and which songs do you omit?! People will be angry whichever songs you remove and, in a digital age, one can merely take the original double-album and select an album’s worth that they can put into a playlist! The thirty moods, stories and skins you get from The Beatles tells a complete story and is a definition of where the band were in 1968. The fact the band might pick a different fourteen songs to the collective critical wisdom suggests an obvious flaw in that plan. Releasing a double-album is risky and can divide but The Beatles knew what they were doing and the songwriting is exceptional. Even the slightly ‘weaker’ cuts are interesting and are worth listening to. Other states The Beatles were on the verge of splitting. Maybe John Lennon thought they were doomed and George Martin was happy. There were a few spats and issues – Starr briefly left and there were a few arguments; Yoko Ono’s increasing role in the studio meant she and Lennon were separate from the rest of the band; Harrison often wrote alone and did not have a partner – but the band were on the same page when it came to getting the material down. You cannot record a song as complete and formidable as Helter Skelter (Paul McCartney’s offering) if you are divided and squabbling.

 IN THIS IMAGE: The cover for the Super Deluxe Anniversary Edition of The Beatles/IMAGE CREDIT: Apple Records/Getty Images  

A lot of the outtakes and in-studio discussions show there was calm and that willingness to explore and unite. Whereas Let It Be, which followed the following year, was a visibly tense and notoriously fractured album; The Beatles is a lot more harmonious and easy than most assume. This article looks at the band being ‘broken’ doing 1968:

How seriously were the Fabs adhering to the path of spiritual awakening as they returned to the studio to work on the follow-up to Sgt Pepper?

George Harrison, it seemed, was still into it. John Lennon was out of it, and maybe not just figuratively. When asked whether he had returned from holiday with anything "fantastic", he replied: "Yes. A beard."

McCartney's attention had drifted into a world of musical pastiche and Ringo Starr was unimpressed with the way things were shaping.

Not the most auspicious of starts. The truth is the Beatles hadn't really been on the same page since they stopped touring in 1966 but, buoyed on by phenomenal success, they just kept going.

Another major problem for the group was that they were without a manager. Brian Epstein had died of an accidental overdose just at the point when they were delving into meditation.

Aside from the colossal personal impact of this tragedy, the group's business affairs were now all at sea...

gf.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: The Beatles during their ‘Mad Day Out’ in the summer of 1968/PHOTO CREDIT: Tom Murray 

Business differences were to cause them problems for the next few years.

Lennon and McCartney also had another issue to contemplate. While the quality of their songs, whether written separately or together (an increasingly rare event) was seldom in question, now they had a third songwriter to accommodate.

The material which Harrison was bringing to sessions was good. So good, in fact, that it threatened to eclipse theirs. Some would say it did.

Lennon was also bemusing his bandmates by bringing his new partner, conceptual artist Yoko Ono, along to every recording session.

On top of all this, their stalwart producer George Martin, frustrated at the band's undisciplined approach to recording, walked away from the project suddenly, depriving them of his genius in the process.

Arguments ensued. Paranoia was rampant. Ringo had enough and left the group, only to be coaxed back by the others, but not before they'd nailed the album's two opening tracks without him.

The White Album ended up being the record on which The Beatles cracked inwardly and irreversibly as a group.

As Harrison so accurately observed: "The only thing we could do was write songs and make records and be Beatles… successfully. And there were always good songs".

Whatever the opinions regarding their fragility and mental states; whether the album should be a single or a double; we are listening to it fifty years after release and revelling in its myriad voices and sights. It is a masterful work that, through the courses of thirty songs, covers multiple genres and themes. Paul McCartney alone is responsible for penning Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da (a jaunty, Music Hall number), Blackbird (a Folk song about civil rights); Helter Skelter (a forerunner to Metal) and Back in the U.S.S.R. (a nod to the style of The Beach Boys). John Lennon was not to be outdone and wrote what is seen as one of the (if not the) best song on the album: Happiness Is a Warm Gun. It is a multi-part suite that would be taken to heart by the likes of Radiohead (Paranoid Android) and multiple artists. Lennon was not deliberately trying to do a suite-like song but he was following his instincts. Lennon also wrote Julia (about his late mother) and Glass Onion; The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill (a child-like song you’d imagine coming from McCartney) and Revolution 9 (more a soundscape than a traditional song). There were efforts from George Harrison – including the Eric Clapton-featuring While My Guitar Gently Weeps – but it was the lead songwriters opening their minds to the limit and coming up with some of the best material of their careers. They were no longer writing the three-minute Pop song for radio and worried about performing these songs for enthralled audiences (the band stopped touring before Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band as they could not hear themselves sing anymore).

bb.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

You notice stunning drum fills or great effects; lyrics that jump out of nowhere and songs that burrow their way onto the brain. Denying the world of all the songs would be a crime and you’d miss out on so many gems. Giles Martin’s care and dedication means not only do we get to hear the originals fresher and in a modern context but there is more content around the songs: those discussions and outtakes show how numbers came to be and the process of experimentation. I urge people to buy the anniversary releases and get involved with every note and scrap that you can find. Not only was The Beatles the sound of a band, once more, changing the game but it was a record that few have managed to match. Bands such as The Clash and The 1975 have taken various elements from The Beatles and used them in their own work but I cannot think of another band who has managed to make such a scattershot and diverse record. Many might say one cannot release a double-album in the streaming age. Not only would people cherry-pick songs and discard the majority of the album; critics would roll their eyes and suggest it be narrowed to a single L.P. Taking risks is a way of moving music forward and we would not be as attached to The Beatles’ eponymous album were it not for the number of songs and how much ground is covered.

Consider how many different genres there are included and that provides a tantalising prospect for a new band! Maybe a solo artist could attempt it but, for those out there who are looking to push boundaries and blow the game open; why not look at The Beatles and take the lead from this incredible work of art?! I feel there are so many lessons and secrets to be discovered that you could make a modern-day equivalent. Maybe the recording process would be different in terms of the personnel but I don’t think you need to go ultra-modern and use high-tech stuff. Using 4 and 8-track recorders to give it that vintage sound – and keeps you focused and provides a challenge – and not limiting yourself in terms of subject matter (The Beatles covered everything from birthdays to loneliness through to civil rights and the rich elite on their self-titled album) is a good idea. Maybe not every song will hit the mark but it will allow you to indulge, not be limited by convention and routine and could lead to something spectacular. I know a lot of bands who were playing around the time of The Beatles’ release and taking heed from it. This fascinating study of The Beatles talks about the way the ‘fashion’ of the record has lived on:

They fashioned their look in a similarly simple style. The gaudy showbiz flash of the Pepper era joined the Epstein-dictated sartorial conservatism of their touring years on the cultural scrap heap. In their black waistcoats, white shirts, black hats, snake-hipped, low-slung, tapered and tailored flares, they looked more like a gang than like a marching band. Cuban-heeled, ankle-hugging Chelsea boots, mix-and-match moustaches and meticulously mussed hair suggested the brooding frontier cool of the American West, riverboat gamblers with issues. It was an enduring stylistic template for the likes of the Black Crowes, The Raconteurs and the Temperance Movement. The ’68 Beatles – a one-stop shop for 21st-century stylists – were rock-band-cool incarnate”.

99.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: The Super Deluxe Anniversary Edition of The Beatles/PHOTO CREDIT: Apple Records/Getty Images  

I think too many artists balk at the idea of doing a double-album and feel it will be panned. The fact that The Beatles loved their eponymous album means the experience was great and shows they were united in a common goal. They broke ground and created this breath of fresh air back in 1968. There have been a few half-arsed attempts to go some way to redefining the album but nobody has managed to go far enough to get the tongue wagging. It is 2018 and we have more sounds and genres available at the fingertips than fifty years ago. Modern artists can listen to the giddiness of Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da and the roar of Helter Skelter and marvel. They can vacillate over Good Night and Glass Onion and, rather than admire those songs; try making their own versions and following in the footsteps of The Beatles. It is a hard ask but the time is right and I feel a modern challenge would be well-met and admired. So, then...why buy the anniversary edition(s) of The Beatles?! You could stick with the original and have all the songs there – one gets so much more with tomorrow’s release:

The BEATLES (‘White Album’) releases include:

Super Deluxe: The comprehensive, individually numbered 7-disc and digital audio collections feature:

CDs 1 & 2: The BEATLES (‘White Album’) 2018 stereo album mix

CD3: Esher Demos

- Esher Demo tracks 1 through 19 sequenced in order of the finished song’s placement on ‘The White Album.’ Tracks 20-27 were not included on the album.

CDs 4, 5 & 6: Sessions

- 50 additional recordings, most previously unreleased, from ‘White Album’ studio sessions; all newly mixed from the four-track and eight-track session tapes, sequenced in order of their recording start dates.

Blu-ray:

- 2018 album mix in high resolution PCM stereo

- 2018 DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 album mix

- 2018 Dolby True HD 5.1 album mix

- 2018 direct transfer of the album’s original mono mix

DeluxeThe BEATLES (‘White Album’) 2018 stereo album mix + Esher Demos

The 3CD; 180-gram 4LP vinyl box set (limited edition); and digital audio collections pair the 2018 stereo album mix with the 27 Esher Demos.

Standard 2LP Vinyl: The BEATLES (‘White Album’) 2018 stereo mix

180-gram 2LP vinyl in gatefold sleeve with faithfully replicated original artwork

 

The minimalist artwork for ‘The White Album’ was created by artist Richard Hamilton, one of Britain’s leading figures in the creation and rise of pop art. The top-loading gatefold sleeve’s stark white exterior had ‘The BEATLES’ embossed on the front and printed on the spine with the album’s catalogue number. Early copies of ‘The White Album’ were also individually numbered on the front, which has also been done for the new edition’s Super Deluxe package.

The set’s six CDs and Blu-ray disc are housed in a slipsleeved 164-page hardbound book, with pull-out reproductions of the original album’s four glossy color portrait photographs of John, Paul, George, and Ringo, as well as the album’s large fold-out poster with a photo collage on one side and lyrics on the other. The beautiful book is illustrated with rare photographs, reproductions of handwritten and notated lyrics, previously unpublished photos of recording sheets and tape boxes, and reproduced original ‘White Album’ print ads.

76677.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: The three-C.D. Anniversary Edition of The Beatles/PHOTO CREDIT: Apple Records/Getty Images 

The book’s comprehensive written pieces include new introductions by Paul McCartney and Giles Martin, and in-depth chapters covering track-by-track details and session notes reflecting The Beatles’ year between the release of ‘Sgt. Pepper’ and recording sessions for ‘The White Album,’ the band’s July 28 1968 “Mad Day Out” photo shoot in locations around London, the album artwork, the lead-up and execution of the album’s blockbuster release, and its far-ranging influence, written by Beatles historian, author and radio producer Kevin Howlett; journalist and author John Harris; and Tate Britain’s Senior Curator of Modern and Contemporary Art Andrew Wilson. The Deluxe 3CD is presented in an embossed digipak with the fold-out poster and portrait photos, plus a 24-page booklet abridged from the Super Deluxe book. Presented in a lift-top box with a four-page booklet, the limited edition Deluxe 4LP vinyl set presents the 2LP album in a faithful, embossed reproduction of its original gatefold sleeve with the fold-out poster and portrait photos, paired with the 2LP Esher Demos in an embossed gatefold sleeve”.

Say what you want about albums that followed The Beatles but nobody cannot deny, in 1968, the world’s best band were onto something and throwing away the rules! It remains this fascinating and multifarious treasure chest from four men who wants to create something historic. They did that and did so much more. We might pick odd tracks from The Beatles to ignore but I think each song is a part of the tapestry and essential. Through time, musicians and fans alike have given their views and expressed their love. I think now, as we marvel fifty years on; it is a great time for a modern act to look at The Beatles and...

77.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Paul McCartney during the recording of The Beatles in 1968/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images 

CHALLENGE themselves to match it!

FEATURE: A Woman in a Beret, a Smoke-Filled Café and a Magical Moment in Woodstock: Joni Mitchell at Seventy-Five: An Icon Who Can Paint Lyrical Images Like No Other

FEATURE:

 

 

A Woman in a Beret, a Smoke-Filled Café and a Magical Moment in Woodstock

jjjjjjjjjjjjjj.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: Joni Mitchell/IMAGE CREDIT: Georgia O’Keefe/Getty Images

Joni Mitchell at Seventy-Five: An Icon Who Can Paint Lyrical Images Like No Other

__________

I hate to open a feature talking about mortality…

jjj.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell in Amsterdam in 1972/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

but we are seeing icons pass and it is sad to realise we will never see the like of them again. Stunning songwriters like Leonard Cohen have gone and David Bowie, that ever-intriguing master, is no longer with us. I guess you can never predict when a big musician will leave the world but it is always poignant reflecting on what they provided and the fact we will not get to hear anything from them. Fortunately, in the case of Joni Mitchell, she is still with us and, let’s hope, not far from making some more music. She has not had the best of luck with her health. In 2009, she came out and stated she was suffering from Morgellons syndrome. It is a self-diagnosed skin condition that many believe is a delusional infestation. Mitchell said this thing was incurable and bugging her but that her health in general was as good as ever. In 2015, tragically, we almost lost her after she suffered a brain aneurysm. Mitchell was found unconscious in her L.A. home and regained consciousness whilst in transit to the hospital. There have not been a lot of updates since then but there were reports circulating she was in a coma. As of today, she is not but her health is far from perfect. It makes the idea of a new studio album unlike but not impossible.

Her last album, 2007’s Shine, was her first new work since 1998 and was a great relief to see. Many felt we would not see new material from Joni Mitchell and Shine, whilst simplistic in places, did have a sparseness and sound that harked back to her earliest work. It seems like we might be ambitious to demand new work but I am glad Mitchell is still with us and, gloomy as that sounds, she is an icon that has given the music world endless pleasure, brilliance and genius. Even when her work is a bit more basic – her later work does not match the scope and sharpness of her classic albums – I feel there is still so much to recommend. I have been listening to a lot of songs on Ladies of the Canyon (1970) and you get these sweeping stories and detailed studies. Characters, whether desolate or blissed-out, are set against vivid and tangible landscapes; painted and performed beautifully by Mitchell.  That album contains poignant and desolate character studies like The Arrangement and takes inside apartments, mindsets and moods. Mitchell, even on early albums such as Ladies of the Canyon, was able to deliver with such a sense of command and gravitas that you jumped into the songs. From the down-on-their-luck and overlooked figure of her darker songs; there was the optimism of Woodstock and a generation trying to “get back to the garden” – a sense of hope and community in a rather testing situation.

ll.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

Whilst one might interpret Woodstock as hopeful there are, in fact, quite hard and strained messages that linger in the mind. Her 1970 work marked a bolder move and break from the slightly simpler stuff she was putting out at the start. Whilst not as accomplished and resonant as the material she would put out only a year later; you can sense this incredible mind starting to blossom and open up. Even a peppy and uplifting song like Big Yellow Taxi is an ecological study where parking lots are paving everything and it seems the natural world is disappearing. It is unsurprising an artist growing up around political tensions and wars would reflect these themes through music but it the consciousness and connection with what is around her that strikes me. I often associate modern songwriting with an insularity and a sense of looking down – artists not always opening their minds to concerns of the world and detailing characters. Although a lot of autobiography would come through soon; some of Mitchell’s best work arrives when she details lovers in cafés and elicit bonds in hotels; smoke-filled rooms and sweethearts passing by; a generation coming together or this strange figure moving and weaving through song. So many modern songwriters bring basic language to personal songs and they can be rather cloying. There are exceptions but few can write anywhere near as strikingly as Mitchell. Consider an album like Blue (1971) and the narrative shifts from widescreen third-person to a more confined and personal line.

nn.png

 IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell with James Taylor at her Lookout Mountain cottage, 1971/PHOTO CREDIT: Joel Berstein

Although there are characters and one might think fictional figures are being spoke about; Blue is an intrinsically personal record that showed, even in her twenties, the songwriter could write in a hugely impressive and mature fashion. Mitchell once said her writing and self was as exposed as a wrapping on a packet of cigarettes. She was not hiding anything and her bones, scars and tears were there for the world to hear. Whilst there have been some genius break-up record – Blood on the Tracks by Bob Dylan is considered one of the best – there are few that are as arresting and enduring as Blue. Not only would that album signal a (brief) move from something character-based to personal but it was a huge creative leap. Backed by exceptional musicians and the piano (which came into her music in a more defining and prominent way); Mitchell has arrived as a songwriter – this was her taking a huge leap and, to many, she never made a bigger move. We have a lot of modern songwriters who are confessional and open but you never get that same sense of poetry and literary. Even when she discusses a break-up or loneliness; it is done so in such a moving and intelligent manner that one is hooked and invested.

99.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell at her Laurel Canyon home (date unknown; around 1968-1970)/PHOTO CREDIT: Henry Diltz/CORBIS

You can hear the spirit of Joni Mitchell in Laura Marling: a songwriter who has the same affinity for language and able to write in a broad and stunning way. Blue is seen as Mitchell’s finest record and you cannot argue against that. Whilst the mood is largely sombre and emotive; there are stunning line and wonderful poetry. Blue’s eponymous track states “Songs are like tattoos” and the immortal “Acid, booze and ass/Needles, guns and grass/Lots of laughs” is (a thought) that provokes the imagination and makes you smile. Songs on Blue documented this passionate and liberation woman who was travelling this road and, at the same time, was scared and excite. She could take a line like “I am on a lonely road, and I am traveling, traveling, traveling, traveling” and make it sound thrilling yet heartbreaking. She was part of the 1970s culture and this liberated, impassioned woman who was drinking in everything around her and wanted her voice to be heard. There was a lot of personal perspective but Mitchell was always inspired by people and scene around and bringing those into music. It is that personal angle that gives the songs more weight and conviction. Not willing to disguise hardship and fraught feelings; this was someone who wanted the listener to be involved and understand her mind.

bbbbbb.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

Even when she was talking about the ups and downs of rootlessness and uncertainty; it seemed like she was speaking to the world and could understand those listening. Listen to songs like River (Blue) and how she wishes she had a river (“I could skate away on”). Maybe the Christmas song is a regret at the lack of snow and winteriness around her; maybe it is that need for escape or a chance to embrace something precious – in a single line, she could convey such intrigue and wonder. The Circle Game (Ladies of the Canyon’s closing track) talks of seasons go around and a carousel of time; not being able to return – only look behind – and go around and around. The use of this charming and traditional setting is a perfect way of talking about life and how it is a circle. In other tracks, Mitchell could document like no other the torment of staying alone and pining for love or embracing it and fear being rejected – Help Me (Court and Spark) perfectly expresses that decision and the unpredictable nature of love. Even when the subject matter was a little more straightforward and common (such as passion and trust) she has a way of writing in a fresh and unique manner. Her vocal prowess and the way she could elongate, twist and emphasise helped bring the layers and magic from the songs.

cl.jpg

  IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

The more Mitchell steps into Jazz territory – albums such as Court and Spark (1974) were more progressive and experimental than Blue and earlier work – the more vivid and fascinating her visions became. There are people who say her more focused and personal work yielded the most profound lyrics whilst some prefer the songwriter when she was letting her mind wander and taking a different road. Look back to an early album like Clouds (1969) and Chelsea Morning poses the following: “Oh won’t you stay/We’ll put on the day, And we’ll talk in present tenses”. There is then a quirky line about rainbows running away and Mitchell bringing her suitor “incense owls by night”. You can feel that clash of the romantic and alluring with the odd and charming. We have modern-day writers like Laura Marling who can write in a similarly grand and accomplished way but nothing (she has produced) can match the greatness of Joni Mitchell. This fascinating article from Sean O’Hagan in 2013 where he was writing in The Guardian talked about Mitchell’s lyrics and how her creative mind was like no other. The seeds of brilliance were planted early on:

For a long time, I’ve been playing in straight rhythms,” Mitchell told her friend, Malka Marom, in 1973, in the first of the three extended interviews that are included in Both Sides Now, a new book published next month. “But now, in order to sophisticate my music to my own taste, I push it into odd places that feel a little unusual to me, so that I feel I’m stretching out”…

7675.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: A self-portrait of Joni Mitchell/IMAGE CREDIT: Joni Mitchell/Getty Images 

“Sophistication – melodic, lyrical, compositional – is an undervalued currency in popular music, though it illuminates the finest songs written by artists as diverse as Lennon and McCartney, Randy Newman, Ray Davies, Brian Wilson, Marvin Gaye and Curtis Mayfield as well as the songwriters for hire of an earlier era – Cole Porter, Rodgers and Hart, George Gershwin. It also defines the best songs that Joni Mitchell wrote at her creative peak, which, for me, stretched from the release of Blue (1971), through For the Roses (1972), Court and Spark (1974) and The Hissing of Summer Lawns (1975), to the pared and broodingly atmospheric Hejira (1976)”.

The music arrangements and their sophistication are often overlooked by some. Many focus on the voice and how divisive it can be. Some find her tones and way of singing grating or unappetising: for those with a more refined and educated palette; nobody could sing her songs as powerful and purely. Much more accessible and rounded a voice than Bob Dylan; Mitchell was able to absorb and inspire listeners with her incredible words and striking voice. Her compositions became more layered, deep and ambitious. In interviews; Mitchell professed her love for some of Bob Dylan’s songs but did not think he was all that when it came to compositions and the music. Maybe Dylan was a bit more straight and linear but Mitchell, one cannot deny, could take her music into new realms and project so much emotion, colour and story.

The sophistication of her songwriting and, in particular, her musical arrangements is the essential element that sets Joni Mitchell apart from her contemporaries and her peers, whether the troubadours of the early 70s Laurel Canyon singer-songwriter scene or lyrical heavyweights such as Leonard Cohen, Neil Young and even Bob Dylan. And yet in the music industry, Mitchell has never really been afforded the kind of respect heaped on her male counterparts. Rolling Stone magazine once listed her at No 62 in its 100 greatest artists of all time, just below Metallica. She was belatedly inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1997, but did not attend the ceremony. At 70, she remains a defiant outsider and recluse, who has often expressed her disgust at the music business. And who can blame her?

8.jpg

  IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell captured in 2015/PHOTO CREDIT: Norman Jean Roy for The Cut 

Although she was not a fan of Dylan’s compositions all of the time; the respect she held for the masterful songwriter was clear:

There wasn’t much room for poetic description in those older melodic songs,” she noted in a 2003 Canadian documentary, Woman of Heart and Mind. “That’s why I liked the more storytelling quality of Dylan’s work and the idea of the personal narrative. He would speak as if to one person in a song… That was the key that opened all the doors”.

I love how Mitchell, like every icon, was able to switch between albums and did not rest on her laurels. She could have, after Blue, stayed on that course and written in that manner for years. The reviews might have been good but, as Mitchell would have said, that would not be emotionally sustainable! The fragility she felt around the time gave the songs their beauty and truth but they were taking a lot from the creator. Joni Mitchell released six albums between 1968’s Song to a Seagull and 1974’s Court and Spark – 1973 was the only year she did not release a record – and you can feel an evolution and change between the albums. Whilst her musical palette was widening and the artist was maturity; it is the growth and intensity coming through that seemed to define her lyrics by the time of Court and Spark – as O’Hagan documented in his article:

Despite all these scattered clues, though, Court and Spark came as a surprise. Gone was the fragile, confessional songstress in a flowing dress; instead, here was a confident, full-throated singer in designer threads with a slick electric band in tow. Gone, too, were the acoustic songs sung with just a guitar, piano or dulcimer backing, replaced by an electric, jazz-inflected, intricately arranged sound, courtesy of Tom Scott’s LA Express, that weaved around lyrics that were acutely observational or dazzlingly impressionistic, rather than soul-baringly confessional. When her friend, Malka Marom, author of Both Sides Now, asked her if the band’s presence meant that she might risk the vulnerable singer-songwriter image she had cultivated, Mitchell replied defiantly: “Well, I don’t want to be vulnerable any more.”

Not for the first or last time, Joni Mitchell had moved on and, in doing so, had remade herself in the manner of a true artist”.

kl.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images 

Through every year and revelation; the songwriting got bolder and was always curious as to what was around her. Although 1975’s The Hissing of Summer Lawns got a bit of a press kicking; it has inspired many modern-day songwriters:

Among those who did get The Hissing of Summer Lawns, though, were Morrissey – who called it “the first album that completely captivated me” – and Prince. “Hissing got thrashed,” a defiant but still bruised Mitchell recalls in Both Sides Now. “But meanwhile out there was Prince. That was his first Joni record, and it was his Joni record of all time. So, though it got thrashed by the press, the young artists coming up could see there was something going on there.”

jh.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell photoed in 1976/PHOTO CREDIT: Norman Seeff

What was going on was another refinement of style, another burnishing of lyrical and musical sophistication. Both the title track and Edith and the Kingpin dissect the compromises made by women bound by marriage to powerful men. The former has poetry aplenty, her observational skill honed to near perfection as she elaborates the consequences of a hollowed-out life behind the high walls of a mansion in the Hollywood hills: “He gave her his darkness to regret, and good reason to quit him/ He gave her a roomful of Chippendale that nobody sits in”.

In honour of Joni Mitchell’s seventy-five years on the planet; I have ended this piece with a seventy-five-song playlist that, I feel, explores every aspect and sinew of her lyrical body. Whilst her compositions and vocals were (are) magical and like nothing else; how she could present these stories and create such powerful words has inspired me. It is hard to think of a songwriter since Joni Mitchell who has been able to write in the same way and has that distinct pen. That is why, as I was saying, it is hard to lose these icons of music. We hope there are many more years left in Mitchell and she returns to full health very soon. Who knows; even though she is comfortable into her seventy and her glory days are behind; maybe we will all be able to look forward to the day Joni Mitchell…

44.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell captured in 2015/PHOTO CREDIT: Norman Jean Roy for The Cut 

RETURNS to the studio!

FEATURE: Little Green, Blue and a Big Yellow Taxi: Joni Mitchell at Seventy-Five: Her Eight Most Essential Albums

FEATURE:

 

 

Little Green, Blue and a Big Yellow Taxi

111.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images 

Joni Mitchell at Seventy-Five: Her Eight Most Essential Albums

__________

I might have another Joni Mitchell piece in me…

222.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Joni Mitchell in April 1983/PHOTO CREDIT: Laurie Lewis

but I wanted to say, first, a happy seventy-fifth birthday to her – so let’s get the ball rolling by collating together her eight finest albums! That might seem like an arbitrary number but I feel there is tough competition regarding her back catalogue and many people often assume her with the one album, Blue. Mitchell has suffered ill health in the past – which I might investigate in a later piece – but I know the Queen of Folk and music icon is loved by millions and everyone hopes she will be able to recover and record another album.

As we mark the special birthday of one of music’s finest poets and figures; I have brought together seven albums that display Mitchell’s exceptional talents and show why she is one of music’s true treasures. For each, I have brought together a little background; a critical review and highlighted the standout track – and put the full album available via Spotify. Have a look at the rundown and assembly and get involved with some magnificent Joni Mitchell gold! As we all raise a glass to the legendary songwriter; here are some wonderful albums that are a perfect introduction…

99.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

TO a true and peerless icon.

ALL ALBUM COVERS: Getty Images

______________

Number-One: Blue (1971)

1.jpg

Release Date: 22nd June, 1971

Label: Reprise

Producer: Joni Mitchell

Background:

Despite the success of her first three albums and songs like "Woodstock", January 1970 saw Mitchell make a decision to break from performing. In early spring 1970, she set off on a vacation around Europe.[12] While on the island of Formentera, she wrote some of the songs that appear on Blue.[13] This journey was the backdrop for the songs "Carey" and "California".[14] Some of the songs on Bluewere inspired by Mitchell's 1968-1970 relationship with Graham Nash.[14] Their relationship was already troubled when she left for Europe, and it was while she was on Formentera that she sent Nash the telegram that let him know that their relationship was over.[14]The songs "My Old Man"[14] and "River"[15] are thought to be inspired by their relationship” – Wikipedia

Review:

1971's Blue is possibly the most gutting break-up album ever made. After Mitchell's relationship with Nash dissolved, she headed to Europe to lose the tether of her fame, eventually taking exile in a cave on the Greek island Crete. The trip would inspire the how-Joni-got-her-groove-back ditties "Carey" and "California". The album is suffused with melancholy for all that is missing: her daughter ("Little Green"), innocence ("The Last Time I Saw Richard"), and connection ("All I Want"). Mitchell bleeds diffidence and highlights it with spare notes plucked out on her Appalachian dulcimer. While her pals Neil Young, Leonard Cohen, and Laura Nyro were also pushing the singer-songwriter genre forward, none of them managed to stride the distance that Mitchell did here in a single album” – Pitchfork

Standout Track: Blue

Number-Two: Ladies of the Canyon (1970)

lllll.jpg

Release Date: March 1970

Label: Reprise

Producer: Joni Mitchell

Background:

The album is notable for its expansion of Mitchell's artistic vision and its varied song topics (ranging from the aesthetic weight of celebrity, to observation of the Woodstock generation, to the complexities of love). Ladies of the Canyon is often viewed as a transition between Mitchell's folky earlier work and the more sophisticated, poignant albums that were to follow. In particular, "For Free" foreshadows the lyrical leitmotif of the isolation triggered by success that would be elaborated upon in For the Roses and Court and Spark. The sparse, alternate-tuning laden sound of later records comes to the forefront on "Ladies of the Canyon" (one of those "ladies" supposedly being female underground comix pioneer Trina Robbins)[12]” – Wikipedia

Review:

Songs here take many moods, ranging from the sunny, easygoing "Morning Morgantown" (a charming small-town portrait) to the nervously energetic "Conversation" (about a love triangle in the making) to the cryptically spooky "The Priest" (presenting the speaker's love for a Spartan man) to the sweetly sentimental classic "The Circle Game" (denoting the passage of time in touching terms) to the bouncy and vibrant single "Big Yellow Taxi" (with humorous lyrics on ecological matters) to the plummy, sumptuous title track (a celebration of creativity in all its manifestations). This album is yet another essential listen in Mitchell's recorded canon” – AllMusic

Standout Track: Woodstock

Number-Three: Court and Spark (1974)

ll.jpg

Release Date: 1 January, 1974

Label: Asylum

Producers: Joni Mitchell, Henry Lewy

Background:

1973 was the first year since she began recording that Mitchell did not release a new album. Her previous offering, For the Roses, was released in November 1972 to critical and commercial success, and Mitchell decided to spend the whole of the next year writing and recording a new album that revealed her growing interest in new sounds—particularly jazz. During 1973, her stage appearances were fewer than in previous years. She performed in April in a benefit concert at the Sir George Williams University Auditorium and then appeared live again in August, twice at The Corral Club, accompanied by Neil Young.

Mitchell spent most of 1973 in the recording studio creating Court and Spark. Mitchell and producer/engineer Henry Lewy called in a number of top L.A. musicians to perform on the album including members of The Crusaders, Tom Scott's L.A. Express, cameos from Robbie RobertsonDavid Crosby & Graham Nash and even a twist of comedy from Cheech & Chong” – Wikipedia

Review:

Lyrically, Mitchell is at her sharpest—and occasionally wittiest—on tracks such as the album’s jaunty first single “Raised On Robbery,” the light n’ jazzy “Free Man In Paris” (long said to be about record exec David Geffen) and the aforementioned “People’s Parties.” Whether she’s ruminating on love found and lost (capturing the quagmire of emotions with one simple line: “Laughing and crying/You know it’s the same release”) or the pitfalls of her newfound celebrity (she would continue to rally against “the star-making machinery behind the popular songs” throughout her career), Mitchell is, with Court and Spark, represented at the peak of her talents for crafting song-stories that are simultaneously inventive, intricate, and unfailingly melodic. And while many of today’s artists have exhibited shades of such talent, not many—of either gender—have been able to match such a dizzying height. Thus, also taking into consideration its mid-‘70s California dreaminess, Court and Spark is not only the best soundtrack to a Sunday morning ever made, it’s also an essential, timeless artifact of an era when pop could be both popular and personal, and would be rewarded critically and commercially for such qualities” – SLANT

Standout Track: Free Man in Paris

Number-Four: Clouds (1969)

76.jpg

Release Date: 1 May, 1969

Label: Reprise

Producers: Joni Mitchell, Paul A. Rothchild

Background:

After moving to New York City and signing to Reprise Records in 1967, Mitchell recorded her 1968 debut album Song to a Seagull with producer David Crosby. The album was a mostly acoustic set of songs, some of which were subsequently covered by more successful singers. Consequently, Mitchell received more outside exposure and began to earn a strong cult following.[1]

Mitchell recorded Clouds at A&M Studios in Hollywood and played acoustic guitar and keyboards; she was joined by Stephen Stills on guitar.[2] She produced all of the album's songs, except "Tin Angel", which was produced by Paul A. Rothchild.[3] She also painted the album's cover artwork—a self-portrait.[4]

Two songs, "Chelsea Morning" and "Both Sides, Now", had already been recorded by other singers by the time Mitchell started work on the album.[5] Mitchell wrote "Both Sides, Now" after reading Saul Bellow's 1959 novel Henderson the Rain King on a plane and drawing on a point in the novel where the protagonist is looking at clouds from a plane.[6] The coincidence inspired the song's lyric about looking at clouds from both sides as a metaphor for life's ambiguities and mysteries, as she explained in a 1967 interview, "I dreamed down at the clouds, and thought that when I was a kid I had dreamed up at them, and having dreamed at the clouds from both sides as no generation of men has done, one should be able to accept his death very easily."[6]” – Wikipedia

Review:                                                                   

Clouds (1969) is the introduction to Mitchell's real deal, shaking folk tradition and giving off a little humor and spirit. The album sounds casual. Lyrically, she was transitioning from the era's de facto hippie sensualism (colors! the weather! vibes!) to the classically prosodic style (Keats! Cohen!) she'd become known for. The album's biggest signs of life are two of her most famous songs-- the kicky "Chelsea Morning", which is about as straightforward as Mitchell ever got, and "Both Sides Now". Though she'd known burden and heartache plenty by her still-tender age (she'd borne a child alone and in secret after dropping out of art school and married singer Chuck Mitchell in order to make a family; he changed his mind a month later and she put the baby up for adoption) she sounds a bit too young and chipper to be singing about disillusionment. Still, Clouds was a landmark, and she landed a Grammy for Best Folk Performance” – Pitchfork  

Standout Track: Both Sides Now

 

Number-Five: For the Roses (1972)

44.jpg

Release Date: November 1972

Label: Asylum

Producer: Joni Mitchell

Background:

It is perhaps best known for the hit single "You Turn Me On, I'm a Radio", which Mitchell wrote sarcastically out of a record company request for a radio-friendly song. The single was indeed a hit, reaching #25 on the Billboard Hot 100 charts, becoming Mitchell's first top 40 hit released under her own name (as a songwriter, several other performers had had hits with songs that she had written). "Cold Blue Steel and Sweet Fire" — a menacing and jazzy portrait of a heroin addict — and the Beethoven-inspired "Judgment of the Moon and Stars" were also popular.

Some of the songs were inspired by Mitchell's 1970-1971 relationship with James Taylor. Despite his difficulties, Mitchell evidently felt that she had found the person with whom she could pair-bond in Taylor. By March 1971, his fame exploded, causing friction. She was reportedly devastated when he broke off the relationship.[3] By November 1971, he had taken up with Carly Simon, whom he married a year later” – Wikipedia  

Review:                                                                   

On For the RosesJoni Mitchell began to explore jazz and other influences in earnest. As one might expect from a transitional album, there is a lot of stylistic ground explored, including straight folk selections using guitar ("For the Roses") and piano ("Banquet," "See You Sometime," "Lesson in Survival") overtly jazzy numbers ("Barangrill," "Cold Blue Steel and Sweet Fire," and hybrids that cross the two "Let the Wind Carry Me," "Electricity," "Woman of Heart and Mind," "Judgment of the Moon and Stars"). "Blonde in the Bleachers" grafts a rock & roll band coda onto a piano-based singer/songwriter main body. The hit single "You Turn Me on I'm a Radio" is an unusual essay into country-tinged pop, sporting a Dylanesque harmonica solo played by Graham Nash and lush backing vocals. Arrangements here build solidly upon the tentative expansion of scoring first seen in Ladies of the Canyon. "Judgment of the Moon and Stars" and "Let the Wind Carry Me" present lengthy instrumental interludes. The lyrics here are among Mitchell's best, continuing in the vein of gripping honesty and heartfelt depth exhibited on Blue. As always, there are selections about relationship problems, such as "Lesson in Survival," "See You Sometime," and perhaps the best of all her songs in this genre, "Woman of Heart and Mind." "Cold Blue Steel and Sweet Fire" presents a gritty inner-city survival scene, while "Barangrill" winsomely extols the uncomplicated virtues of a roadside truck stop. More than a bridge between great albums, this excellent disc is a top-notch listen in its own right” – AllMusic   

Standout Track: For the Roses

 

Number-Six: The Hissing of Summer Lawns (1975)

66.jpg

Release Date: November 1975

Label: Asylum

Producer: Joni Mitchell

Background:

The first track, "In France They Kiss on Main Street", is a jazz-rock song about coming of age in a small town in the 1950s rock & rollera. (The song was released as the single from the album and reached number 66 on the Billboard charts.) "The Jungle Line" uses a field recording from Africa of the Drummers of Burundi (called 'warrior drums' in the credits), onto which are dubbed guitar, Moogsynthesizer and the vocal line. The lyrics pay homage to the works of the French Post-Impressionist painter Henri Rousseau. Mitchell blends details of his works with imagery of modern city life, the music industry and the underground drug culture.

"Edith and the Kingpin" marks a return to jazz in a story of a gangster's new moll arriving in his home town. "Don't Interrupt the Sorrow" is an acoustic guitar–based song with stream-of-consciousness lyrics, focused on women standing up to male dominance and proclaiming their own existence as individuals. "Shades of Scarlett Conquering" is an orchestral-based piece about a modern southern belle basing her life and self-image on the stereotypes of the Scarlett O'Hara character from Gone with the Wind” – Wikipedia

Review:

Joni Mitchell evolved from the smooth jazz-pop of Court and Spark to the radical Hissing of Summer Lawns, an adventurous work that remains among her most difficult records. After opening with the graceful "In France They Kiss on Main Street," the album veers sharply into "The Jungle Line," an odd, Moog-driven piece backed by the rhythms of the warrior drums of Burundi -- a move into multiculturalism that beat the likes of Paul SimonPeter Gabriel, and Sting to the punch by a decade. While not as prescient, songs like "Edith and the Kingpin" and "Harry's House -- Centerpiece" are no less complex or idiosyncratic, employing minor-key melodies and richly detailed lyrics to arrive at a strange and beautiful fusion of jazz and shimmering avant pop” – AllMusic

Standout Track: In France They Kiss on Main Street

 

Number-Seven: Shine (2007)

ss.jpg

Release Date: 25th September, 2007

Labels: Hear Music, Universal

Producer: Joni Mitchell

Background:

In 2002, Joni Mitchell famously left the music business. The public first learned that she had returned to writing and recording in October 2006, when she spoke to The Ottawa Citizen. In an interview with the newspaper, Mitchell "revealed she's recording her first collection of new songs in nearly a decade" but gave few other details.[13]

Four months later, in an interview with The New York Times, Mitchell said that the album was inspired by the war in Iraq and "something her grandson had said while listening to family fighting: 'Bad dreams are good—in the great plan.'"[14]

The Sunday Times wrote in February 2007 that the album has "a minimal feel, a sparseness that harks back to her early work," adding that "rest and some good healers" had restored much of the singer's vocal power.[15] Mitchell herself described Shine as "as serious a work as I've ever done."[15]

The album was launched at the Sunshine Theater on Houston Street, New York City, on September 25, 2007, with a film of the Alberta Ballet performing The Fiddle and the Drum, a ballet devised by choreographer Jean Grand-Maître in collaboration with Mitchell that had premiered in Calgary on February 8 that year. The ballet uses a selection of Mitchell's songs, including "If I Had a Heart" and "If" from Shine, along with images from her art installation Flag Dance, which are projected as a backdrop.[16] The album cover features a scene from The Fiddle and the Drum.

Shine is only the second Joni Mitchell album never to have been distributed by Warner Music Group, the first being Night Ride Home, which was released by Geffen Records after the company was sold to MCA” – Wikipedia

Review:

War and ecological blight are the twin evils that preoccupy Shine. Mountains are levelled, 'babbling cellphone zombies' crowd the malls, earth has become 'a funeral pyre'. On 'Strong and Wrong' Joni names the guilty party: 'Men love war, that's what history is for, his story...'

Mitchell's despondence may be understandable, but for a mistress of the muse, this is desperately simplistic stuff, as if she's just noticed that the bombers didn't turn into butterflies. A new version of 1970's 'Big Yellow Taxi', wisely kept close to her original, reminds us she's been here before - and how much more deftly.

It isn't all doom. The opening track, 'One Week Last Summer', is a joyous instrumental for a perfect North Pacific day. 'Night of the Iguana' distils Tennessee Williams's acclaimed play, and 'If' improbably recycles Rudyard Kipling's homage to the stiff upper lip.

Best is the title track, a roll call of compassion that embraces the darkness of 'Frankenstein technologies' and the hope of 'a safe place for kids to play/ bombs exploding half a mile away'. Both sombre and defiant, it's Mitchell at her finest” – The Observer

Standout Track: Night of the Iguana

Number-Eight: Hejira (1976)

88.jpg

Release Date: November 1976

Label: Asylum

Producer: Joni Mitchell

Background:

According to Mitchell, the album was written during or after three journeys she took in late 1975 and the first half of 1976. The first was a stint as a member of Bob Dylan's Rolling Thunder Revue in late 1975. During this time period, she became a frequent cocaine user, and it would take several years for her to kick the addiction.

In February 1976, Mitchell was scheduled to play about six weeks of concert dates across the US promoting The Hissing of Summer Lawns. However, the relationship between Mitchell and her boyfriend John Guerin (who was acting as her drummer on the string of dates) soured, possibly due to Mitchell's fling with director Sam Shepard during the Rolling Thunder Revue. Tensions became so fraught that the tour was abandoned about halfway through.

The third trip came soon after when Mitchell traveled across America with two men, one of them being a former lover from Australia. This trip inspired six of the songs on the album. She drove with her two friends from Los Angeles to Maine, and then went back to California alone via Florida and the Gulf of Mexico. She traveled without a driver's licence and stayed behind truckers, relying on their habit of signaling when the police were ahead of them; consequently, she only drove in daylight hours.[10][11]

During some of her solo journeys, Mitchell donned a red wig, sunglasses, and told the varying strangers she met that her name was either "Charlene Latimer" or "Joan Black."[12]Despite the disguise, Mitchell was still sometimes recognized” – Wikipedia

Review:

It is to Joni Mitchell’s credit that she comes to no glib conclusions. The conflict between freedom for art’s sake and the need for love forms the basis of most of her songs, and it is her uncertainty, the alternating warmth and chill, which is most fascinating. But if Mitchell is not always inviting, she is never complacent. With Hejira she redefines the elements of her music with as much courage as when she scrutinizes her aims and motivations. And despite the songs of love lost and plans changed, despite the urgent, often stark consciousness of mortality and the absence of comfortable solutions, Hejira is a curiously optimistic album. In “Black Crow,” Mitchell sings, “In search of love and music/ My whole life has been/ Illumination/ Corruption/ And diving, diving, diving, diving…,” her voice swooping and spiraling on the repeated word. That is what Hejira is about: it is not the answers that are most important but the search itself” – Rolling Stone    

Standout Track: Coyote