FEATURE: The July Playlist: Vol. 4: Remember, a woman is a god

FEATURE:

 

 

The July Playlist

ddss.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Tommy Genesis 

Vol. 4: Remember, a woman is a god

__________

ALTHOUGH it is a little quieter…

ccc.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Joel Culpepper/PHOTO CREDIT: FELIX

than previous weeks in terms of big names in the mix, there are still some heavyweights with new tracks out. Alongside music from Tommy Genesis, Joel Culpepper, Lorde, Camia Cabello, Matthew E. White, James Blake, IDER, Leon Bridges, and Tinashe, we have Prince, Dave, IDLES (ft. slowthai), Anne-Marie/Little Mix, The War on Drugs, and Julia Bardo. It is definitely a varied week for music. If you need a boost to get you into the weekend, the collection of new tunes below should do the job. It is going to be a changeable and unsettled weekend for many so, rather than brave the weather, staying in with some good music seems like the sensible option. Take a listen to the best new tracks from…

IN THIS PHOTO: IDER/PHOTO CREDIT: Daniela K Monteiro

THIS week.   

ALL PHOTOS/IMAGES (unless credited otherwise): Artists

__________

aaa.jpg

Tommy Genesis -  a woman is a god

v
we.jpg

Joel Culpepper – Remember

wee.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Ophelia Mikkelson Jones

Lorde - Stoned at the Nail Salon

www.jpg

Camila Cabello – Don’t Go Yet

sss.jpg

Matthew E. White – Electric

rrr.jpg

James Blake – Say What You Will

see.jpg

IDER – obsessed

v
gff.jpg

Leon Bridges – Steam

rr.jpg

Tinashe – I Can See the Future

tee.jpg

Prince – Hot Summer

ccc.jpg

IDLES (ft. slowthai) – Model Village

dsss.jpg

Anne-Marie, Little Mix – Kiss My (Uh Oh)

qqqq.jpg

The War on Drugs – Living Proof

dd.jpg

Julia Bardo - No Feeling

v
dddd.jpg

Alewya – Spirit_X

dasss.jpg

DAISY WORLD – SUNDOWN

sss.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Piczo

Lucy Tun – MONARCHY

v
fwee.jpg

Julia Wolf – Resting B*tch Face: Part 2

www.jpg

Remi Wolf - Liquor Store

v
sss.jpg

Alesha Dixon – War

dsss.jpg

Brandi Carlile - Right on Time

v
sss.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Pooneh Ghana

La Luz - Watching Cartoons

mn.jpg

Penelope Isles – Sailing Still

fff.jpg

Aquilo – Our Bones Turn to Stone

nn.jpg

Grace Davies – toothbrush

dd.jpg

The Linda Lindas – “Oh!”

fss.jpg

Azure Ryder – Some Kind of Love

aaa.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: George Hutton

Jake Bugg – Downtown

ddd.jpg

Larkins – if + when

dss.jpg

Steve Gunn – Fulton

dddd.jpg

Connie Constance - Prim & Propa

sss.jpg

TOPS – Party Again

ddd.jpg

Jetta – He Usually Likes Boys

ss.jpg

Lola Young - Pill or a Lullaby (4AM till sunrise)

eee.jpg

Willow Kayne – I Don’t Wanna Know

ee.jpg

Dave - Three Rivers

daa.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Nicole Mago

VÉRITÉ - he’s not you

ttt.jpg

Emma-Jean Thackray - Venus

FEATURE: Spotlight: Enny

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

ssss.jpg

ENNY

___________

I am a little slow off the mark…

 PHOTO CREDIT: Udoma Janssen for CRACK

at the moment regarding some artists that should be in this Spotlight feature! To be fair, I have known about ENNY (Enitan Adepitan). I feel last year was a big year for her. In 2021, ENNY has taken even bigger steps - and she is being compared to some heavyweights of Rap and Hip-Hop (including Lauryn Hill). I am keen to bring in a few interviews where we learn more about the sensational London artist. First, this interview from The Line of Best Fit gives us some insight into her early musical memories and path into music:

“Growing up in Thamesmead, South-East London, Enny's first musical memories are of listening to gospel music in her mum’s car as she was driven around. “Anytime you’d go to church, anytime you’d go to do shopping, or anytime I was just in her car it would just be that gospel music, gospel music, gospel music,” she smiles. “So that was a very fond memory.”

Around the age of seven she joined a local street dance group. The youngest one there, she began dancing to American hip hop, Missy Elliot a particularly prominent feature. “I wanted to be a rapper since I was a kid in primary school. It was always something I wanted to do, it was always in my head,” she says. “I think I’ve always been exposed to music as well, just through family and everywhere. I think that’s one of the most key things I can remember, just listening to music.”

She recounts that a lot of her friendships always grew from a shared love of music. J. Cole was her favourite artist growing up. “I remember trying to tell my friends to listen and then slowly by slowly they all caught on,” she laughs. “It’s very precious that moment, especially as a teenager.”

With her friends at school she formed a group called A8, named after their music room. However, when she left to study film at Canterbury Christchurch, music fell to the wayside. “Musically during uni I wasn’t really like outside, because I’m an introvert so I really just kept to myself and my housemates,” she explains. “I had my production stuff in my room but I never really tried to make music. I think that’s the period in my life where I didn’t really make music or meet other artists or look at the music scene.”

Upon leaving uni she tried to get into the film industry, but found it difficult to catch a break. “I was just getting older and after graduating things weren’t picking up and I just got a normal job,” Enny says. “I’d been there for two years and I started to realise that I wasn’t happy, and then you just start realising that you only have one life and you have a desire to chase it.”

This was a pivotal moment quitting her job and throwing everything back into music. “I was just constantly writing music,” she smiles. “So I would always make music but I wouldn’t release it. So there was a lot of time of me just growing internally and artistically but not putting anything out.”

Now being mentioned amongst a rising tide of black, female, UK rappers, Enny is aware of her position but feels that with opportunity doesn’t necessarily come the responsibility to represent an often homogenised group of people. “I feel like black women always have to be the black woman in these spaces, they can just never be the woman,” she says”.

Although I don’t think Hip-Hop and Rap is truly accepting of women - and it has not amended all of its bad practices - there are so many great women coming through that one cannot ignore! They are helping to break down doors and open up conversations. ENNY is among our brightest young artists. Someone who, surely, is going to rank alongside some of the very best in years to come! Earlier this year, The Guardian caught up with ENNY. I have selected a few sections. It is interesting learning about how she got noticed – and how she has risen in popularity during the pandemic:

“Despite going to university and trying other careers, Adepitan kept making music – and got noticed by local radio stations for a freestyle version of her song He’s Not Into You. That is what put her on the radar of Root 73, an artist-development programme run by people born and raised in Hackney, east London.

“I met Root 73 in 2019 through my now-manager” – Adepitan turns the camera to Pascal, who’s sitting nonchalantly in the driver’s seat, and cackles. “He brought me into Root, which was the studio he was working out of, and they became family. They really took me in, putting me on stage and stuff like that early on, when I only had about three songs,” she says.

Considering her shyness, what were her first experiences on stage like? “Horrible!” she shouts. “I had to drink a lot of alcohol just to get the juices going.”

xxxx.jpg

 After the pandemic broke out and the gigs ended, Adepitan released Peng Black Girls, and by the end of the year it had blown up. The remix, which featured her label-mate Jorja Smith singing the hook rather than former collaborator Amia Brave, had been released via the streaming channel Colors. The video racked up millions of views in a number of days.

Online feedback seems to have been all the more significant for Adepitan given that she rose to fame during the pandemic. It has made for a strange introduction to the industry: the absence of live events means she is yet to meet many women in the business, other than Smith, whom she describes as a passionate perfectionist. “I think I’m still finding my footing,” she says.

When the industry resumes, there is a big world out there for Adepitan to explore. The last few years have seen a sudden boom for women in rap – from the success of Shygirl and Little Simz in the UK, to Megan Thee Stallion and Doja Cat across the pond. “It’s almost like a Renaissance moment for women who are taking a stand in what they want to do, and just being whoever they want to be when it comes to music. They’re not getting stuck in boxes, or focused on what they think that people might want to hear, or what labels are telling them to do. They’re just being themselves.

“Before Cardi [B] and Nicki [Minaj], it was Lil’ Kim and Missy Elliott, like you could pinpoint specific moments,” she says. “But now you’ve got hundreds of lady rappers.”

She admits that sometimes, as a Black woman, she feels the pressure of the industry looming over her. “I feel like that pressure was initially what kind of stalled me for a long time, because I always felt like there wasn’t a market for people that look like me ... for a dark-skinned Black rapper, especially one that was not going to rap about sex or stuff like that.

“But I’m going to die one day. I don’t want to have regrets and be like: ‘Oh, I didn’t do this because another human being thinks a certain way, or society is telling me that I can’t”.

I do wonder, as a Black woman in Rap, whether ENNY will get as many opportunities and platforms as some of her male peers. It is a shame that there are prejudices and discrimination that negatively impacts such strong and promising artists as ENNY. She is clearly fuelled and inspired by some icons of Rap. There is nothing to suggest that she will not be at their level before too long. On the evidence of what she has produced so far, she is going to be very special and adored.

There are a couple more interviews that are worth including before wrapping things up. One of the defining and crowning moments in ENNY’s career so far was the release of her song, Peng Black Girls. It is, as this CRACK interview explains, a huge moment:

“It’s precisely this reason that she put people like her at the centre of the video for her breakthrough track Peng Black Girls. Landing in November 2020, the visuals celebrated Black women of all hues, ages, hair and body types, as Enny takes centre stage looking extremely south London with pretty acrylic nails, a black puffer jacket and fiery red braids. Other scenes paid homage to her Nigerian heritage, with a regal pink gele and ankara dress, and showed her in a black slip evening dress. No matter how often people try to make Blackness monolithic, videos like this showcase its versatility. The song’s memorable opening lines, delivered in a laid-back, bouncy flow, are an ode to this: “There’s peng Black girls in my area code/ Dark skin, light skin, medium tone.”

Upon its release, Peng Black Girls quickly started to gain traction online as other peng Black girls found themselves, their lives and their experiences within the celebratory bars. At the time of writing the original song has more than one million views, while the remix featuring Jorja Smith has almost 5.5 million. “That’s gassy!” she says when I break the news. Enny has been uploading her freestyles onto YouTube since 2018, but it was when she self-released the soulful He’s Not Into You that she was signed to Smith’s label FAMM, setting the wheels in motion for their wildly successful collab on the Peng Black Girls remix. Nowadays, she’s taking a break from looking at the original’s streaming figures as she finds it all “a bit much”.

For now though, it’s Peng Black Girls that has resonated the most with her fans, and cemented her status as a rising star. The song’s success is such that she even had to stop using Hinge after a match recognised her. “Someone said Peng Black Girls yeah?’” she tells me. “And I was like, ‘Nah.’” The song sits among the canon of UK rap that builds and affirms our community in a country that often makes it clear our presence is unwanted at worst and conditional at best. Like Dave’s recent hit Black, or Bashy’s brilliant Black Boys before that, the track holds particular resonance with young Black people who, like Enny, don’t see themselves uplifted often enough. And if both Bashy and Dave’s Afrocentric rap songs hold a special place in UK music history as a reminder not to underestimate yourself, then both have also courted controversy. Peng Black Girls is no different, but rather than the backlash coming from angry white people, the addition of Jorja Smith on the remix served to infuriate some Black commentators. Indeed, the remix eclipsed the original, leading some to question why there was more appetite for a light-skinned pop star reworking a hook that was originally performed by the lesser known, and darker-skinned, Amia Brave”.

Even though she’s not entirely comfortable in her new surroundings yet, Enny finds herself a part of a golden generation of UK rappers. “Looking at the whole scene from soul to R&B there’s real quality,” she reflects, shouting out the new wave from Ragz Originale to Tiana Major9. She’s sanguine when I ask her about the future, revealing she doesn’t have a plan for where she will be in five years. She explains that if she has no expectations then she will be even more “gassed” for whatever lies in store. “I’m just a Black girl from south London and everything that has happened in the last year is mad, the people I’ve met, the interest,” she smiles. “I already feel mad proud”.

 PHOTO CREDIT: Udoma Janssen for CRACK

I want to end up with a great and deep interview from NME. There is a lot to enjoy about the interview. We go back to Peng Black Girls - and we discover how Queen Latifah is a source of inspiration:

“‘Peng Black Girls’, in particular, gives off the same vibes as rapping polymath Queen Latifah and her 1993 single ‘U.N.I.T.Y’. “There was a period of time where I fell in love with Queen Latifah, and just like the messaging of her music. I remember being 16 and hearing that song for the first time, I was like, ‘Oh, my God’. I think it’s great that she’s been recognised for her contributions to hip-hop. I feel like there’s a different energy from women when they rap. Men are more masculine with gangster rap, so when women came out and expressed themselves, it was cool.” Enny loves that the greats like Latifah and Lauryn Hill have paved the way for what we have now; when NME makes the suggestion that she could be the UK’s next Lauryn Hill, she’s smitten – this is the ultimate compliment, after all.

‘Under 25’ is yet more proof of UK rap’s strengths right now; perhaps many are not seeing it, but Enny may well be one to cut through. There are stars like Knucks, Che Lingo, BenjiFlow, who all have cult followings just like Enny’s, but they are getting overlooked by the current mainstream need for quick party songs and intense introspection. Enny feels that this “sick renaissance moment the UK is having” is falling short because there needs to be a place to recognise and a platform for this style of music. But then again, Enny wants you to remember that she “doesn’t want to blow up”, she “just wants to make music”. Her sound blowing up is just a bonus.

But, surely, there’s got to be some deeper mission in the work? Mainly, she wants to “take the music thing worldwide” to keep showing off the real London. The capital is forever changing, clamouring to keep up with worldwide hype and most of the time, it’s at the expense of the rich culture in its most populous areas including south London. And in doing so, she wants to show the world a true depiction of what it means to be a black woman in the UK”.

Go and follow ENNY. She has recruited a lot of fans during the pandemic. I reckon she is eager to get out and perform live. I think that is when we will see her pack her the biggest punch. Looking ahead, there are likely to be E.P.s and more singles released. With every new release, we hear a different side to an amazing and hugely inspiring artist. I shall leave things there. I am already a fan of ENNY. But, having read more about her, I am growing in passion and intrigue. As ENNY has said, there are numerous multi-talented women emerging in Rap right now. Let’s hope that this quality and quantity results in greater parity regarding festival bookings and focus. I know that ENNY herself will be a worldwide success before you know it. She is a sensation that you will want…

TO watch closely.

______________

Follow ENNY

ff.jpg

FEATURE: Childhood Treasures: Albums That Impacted Me: T. Rex – Electric Warrior

FEATURE:

 

 

Childhood Treasures: Albums That Impacted Me

eee.jpg

T. Rex – Electric Warrior

___________

THIS is an album that contains…

aaa.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Marc Bolan in 1971/PHOTO CREDIT: Bob Gruen

a few of the best T. Rex tracks ever. I heard Electric Warrior pretty early on in life. The album was released in 1971 – it celebrates fifty years in September. I mist have heard it in the late-1980s or early-1990s. I was aware of T. Rex to that point, and I had heard the greatest hits. Electric Warrior is the album that I bonded with and still hold dear. It is small wonder. When you consider the strength of the material and Marc Bolan’s phenomenal performances throughout. To me, Bolan is one of the most underrated songwriters ever. Look at some of the songs on Electric Warrior. Cosmic Dancer, Jeepster, Bang a Gong (Get It On), Life's a Gas, and Girl are all gems! When I was a child, I must have been struck by the catchiness of the songs. I had heard quite a bit of Glam music to that point. I was struck by the more theatrical elements of Electric Warrior. What kept me coming back was the variety. There are softer, more emotive numbers against stompers. If you are unfamiliar with Electric Warrior, then go and seek it out. It is one of the most consistently brilliant albums ever released. I am going to conclude with some more thoughts in a bit. Before that, I want to source a couple of reviews for an absolutely magnificent album.

AllMusic gave their impressions of 1971’s Electric Warrior. As you can see, they were hugely moved and stunned by a hugely influential album:

“The album that essentially kick-started the U.K. glam rock craze, Electric Warrior completes T. Rex's transformation from hippie folk-rockers into flamboyant avatars of trashy rock & roll. There are a few vestiges of those early days remaining in the acoustic-driven ballads, but Electric Warrior spends most of its time in a swinging, hip-shaking groove powered by Marc Bolan's warm electric guitar. The music recalls not just the catchy simplicity of early rock & roll, but also the implicit sexuality -- except that here, Bolan gleefully hauls it to the surface, singing out loud what was once only communicated through the shimmying beat. He takes obvious delight in turning teenage bubblegum rock into campy sleaze, not to mention filling it with pseudo-psychedelic hippie poetry. In fact, Bolan sounds just as obsessed with the heavens as he does with sex, whether he's singing about spiritual mysticism or begging a flying saucer to take him away. It's all done with the same theatrical flair, but Tony Visconti's spacious, echoing production makes it surprisingly convincing. Still, the real reason Electric Warrior stands the test of time so well -- despite its intended disposability -- is that it revels so freely in its own absurdity and willful lack of substance. Not taking himself at all seriously, Bolan is free to pursue whatever silly wordplay, cosmic fantasies, or non sequitur imagery he feels like; his abandonment of any pretense to art becomes, ironically, a statement in itself. Bolan's lack of pomposity, back-to-basics songwriting, and elaborate theatrics went on to influence everything from hard rock to punk to new wave. But in the end, it's that sense of playfulness, combined with a raft of irresistible hooks, that keeps Electric Warrior such an infectious, invigorating listen today”.

There is another review that I want to source. When Pitchfork spent some time with Electric Warrior in 2003 (when it was reissued), this is what they said:

“For those hunting down the singles, Electric Warrior does contain the immortal "Bang a Gong (Get it On)", but that's neither the only nor the best reason to pick it up. What makes this record so enduring is its almost accidental emotional depth: When T.Rex is kicking out the jams, they sound like they're having the most gleeful, absurd good time ever committed to wax. There's nothing so glorious in rock and roll as hearing Bolan croon, "Just like a car, you're pleasing to behold/ I'll call you Jaguar if I may be so bold," over his namesake boogie.

The most significant aspect of Electric Warrior isn't its arena rock confidence; it's that Bolan allows his grinning mask to slip. With the incomparable aid of producer Tony Visconti, Bolan sketches a vast, empty room, where, after the party's over, he resides alone, wide-eyed and desperate. On ballads like "Cosmic Dancer", "Monolith" and "Girl", he speaks in the same gibberish as elsewhere, but he's clearly haunted-- by what we can't say. But the gaping, searing question mark that comes at the conclusion of the album-- guitar feedback paired with a string section, holding a shivering and very ambivalent cluster of notes-- is just one of many clues that there's more to Electric Warrior than its surface lets on. This is not simply a man who plays party songs because he wants to: This is a man who plays party songs to fend off darkness”.

I have so much love and respect for Electric Warrior. It is an album that I can put on at any time - and it will make me feel better. From the unique and memorable lyrics, to the musicianship of the band and Marc Bolan’s magnetic vocals, one cannot help but love Electric Warrior. It was an album that impacted me as a child. One would think that the album has diminished or faded from my consciousness as I have played it so many times. The opposite is true. The magnificent 1971-released work of genius is enormously important to me…

AFTER all of these years.

FEATURE: The Kate Bush Interview Archive: 1980: MisK

FEATURE:

 

 

The Kate Bush Interview Archive

qqq.jpg

1980: MisK

___________

I am not sure…

qqq.jpg

who exactly conducted the interview that I am spotlighting today. In this run of Kate Bush features, I am looking back on great interviews through the years. Bush is such a compelling interview subject, that there are dozens to choose from! As I love 1980’s Never for Ever (her third studio album) so much, I wanted to look at a 1980 interview from MisK (I am not sure whether the main image is from 1980; it is around that time). Supplied by this indispensable source of Kate Bush interviews, the interview appears to have been conducted in London. It is a fascinating interview I want to quote sections from. I am not going to put it all here – I would urge people to check out the whole thing. Never for Ever was the album where Bush co-produced alongside Jon Kelly. It was her first big production credit (she assisted Andrew Powell on 1978’s Lionheart); Never for Ever is he most experimental and diverse album to that point. Although some of the questions are overly-personal and intrusive, there are some interesting exchanges:  

“I: One has to begin at the beginning, Kate, and I can't help but realize that I can't make sense of the title of the album: Never For Ever. What does it mean?

K: Well, it's really meant to be reflective of all the things that happen to us all the time ourselves, we're never for ever, death is inevitable, things always pass, good and bad things, so when you're feeling really desperate you know that it's not going to last for ever. It's really saying that everything is transient - ourselves and everything that we are in is transient and we should really remember that because I think to remind you of that makes you think more.

I: During the time since you've made your last album, have you had reason to feel that way?

K: I think it's something I've always felt, probably since I started creating. I think once you start exploring the creative areas you become aware of how transient things are, especially one's writing, one's art. You become very aware of the fact that that won't be around for a long time - maybe, but very unlikely - and so that's something in your mind a lot of the time.

I: And do you feel sometimes that if I don't put this down on paper now I'll forget it and it will be gone for ever?

K: Yes - yes, I think you have to catch a moment when it's happening. It's like not snapping up opportunities when they wave at you - you can so often let things go by you and when you're old you think, wow, I let all those things go by me. You must try to act in the moment, though it's very hard.

I: Does that annoy you at any time - do you feel that you're not the master of your own time - if you get the muse you have to obey it then and there?

K: Yes, but unfortunately a lot of the time the muse is obstructed by other forces. I'll be very busy doing something else and although it's calling me I can go. That's something that I'm very aware of, the fact that when you do feel that there is something there, almost like a gift, I think you sometimes worry that you abuse it or neglect it and that it might go away. I think one of an artist's great fears is of drying up and I think probably anyone who writes must have such fear inside.

I: In "The Wedding List" you have a character named Rudy - is that named after anybody you'd read about in literature or real life?

K: No, not at all. It was really the name that just happened as the words were coming with the song and so I didn't fight it - I just accepted it.

I: Was it your idea to invite Paddy on the album or did he say to you hey, sis, can I be on it?

K: No, it's very much my idea from a long way back to involve Paddy. He's been on all the albums but not really featuring quite so much as on this one. I think one of the great things about this album is that it left much more room for people to do things than on the other ones - it was that direction, much more experimental, exploring. And Paddy played a big part with all the instruments exploring little pieces and areas, absolutely invaluable. Very like animation, his instruments - they just put a little bit of red on here and a little bit of green down there and complete it.

I: Has a great effort gone into the sound of this album, not just the music but the sound?

K: Yes. I thinks sounds are so important because that is what music is - it is the sound of the music - and the way sounds mix and move together is incredible. It is again so similar to colours and to have a pure colour and pure sounds are very similar things. In many ways I think we saw a lot of the sounds a visual things - this is the way I often interpret music, I see it visually, and so in many ways you'd interpret a mountain in the picture into a very pure guitar sound or whatever. I think everyone was very aware of sounds and the animation of it and how a certain sound could imply so much more at one piece in the song.

ssss.jpg

 I: You are the co-producer of this album with Jon Kelly. I suppose this then was your job in that regard, the direction of the sound?

K: Yes. The whole thing was so exciting for me, to actually have control of my baby for the first time. Something that I have been working for and was very nervous of too, obviously, because when you go in for the first time you really wonder if you are capable - you hope you are. Every time that we tried something and it worked it just made you feel so much braver. Of course it doesn't always work, but everyone helping and concentrating on the music, it's such a beautiful thing, it really is a wonderful experience - everyone's feelings going into the songs that you wrote perhaps in a little room somewhere in London, you know, it's all coming out on the tape.

I: The song after that, "Blow Away", is also about musicians, this in a different way - It's about a member of your band, perhaps fictitious, perhaps real life, who wonders where the music goes when he goes. Is there such a person who mentioned that thought to you.

K: No, there isn't such a person who actually said it, but I'm sure I know so many people that think that. I myself do feel that sometimes and it just seemed for someone in my band fictionally to open up to me, made it a much more vulnerable statement. It was really brought on by something - I think it was The Observer. They did an article on all these people who when they'd had cardiac arrests had left their bodies and travelled down a corridor into a room at the end. In the room were all their dead friends that they'd known very well and they were really happy and delighted. Then they'd tell the person that they had to leave and they'd go down the corridor and drop back into their body. So many people have experienced this that there does seem to be some line in it, maybe. It's some kind of defense hysteria, I don't know, but they felt no fear and in fact they really enjoyed it. Most of them have no fear of dying at all. And I thought that a nice idea, what a comfort it was for musicians that worry about their music; (knowing) that they're going to go up into that room and in there there's going to be Jimi Hendrix, Buddy Holly, Minnie Ripperton, all of them just having a great big jam in the sky, and all the musicians will join in with it.

I: And so Bill, who was mentioned in the title, Bill is the fictitious member of the band?

K: No. Bill is Bill Duffield, the gentleman who died on our tour and in so many ways he made me want to write the song right from the beginning. It was such a tragedy and he was such a beautiful person that it only seemed right that there should be something on the next album for him.

I: It's almost ironic that it does have a very up tempo new waveish feel because in some of your earliest interviews you said that some of your favourite artists were the new wave artists even though you yourself did not transmit as a new wave artist. Do you think there's any paradox in that?

K: Hard to say. I suppose I can't really relate to them, that's what I mean, because I do feel different in so many ways, like the way I go about things. I'm not projecting myself as a new wave person and people wouldn't accept me as such because my music is generally not in that area. But I love the energy, I love the power and the rawness - I love raw music, it's very primitive, it's what so much of our music is about. That's what I love and it's something I've always enjoyed - I've always loved rock 'n' roll and only recently have I started learning to control rhythm in my songs. It's normally controlled me and it's mainly the rhythm box that has helped me tremendously.

I: There follows an interlude called "Night Scented Stock". Have you ever wanted to do more in the way of instrumental or sound without words?

K: Yes, I have. I think perhaps I've always felt worried about doing it myself because I've always written songs and I've never really regarded myself as much as a musician as a songwriter. This album taught me that I should be a little more brave about that because music without words is just as beautiful and sometimes I feel the need to just keep putting words on music instead of just letting the music be. I hope in the future that perhaps I will move into that area a little more.

I: You mentioned there's a least one unreleased track - are there tracks we will never hear or will they come out as singles?

K: I think they'll come out. Some of them have already come out as B sides, tracks that weren't on the album we put on the B sides of singles. That's something I've always wanted to do, it's so good to give the public something not on the album, especially if they're going to buy that too. It's quite exciting because you can dig up little novelty tracks that you've forgotten all about that you did years ago and for a B side they're smashing because they're one off and people have never heard them and it's a monument in time that may be from years ago.

I: You mentioned there are some ideas for you now as you consider your next recorded work - do you think you will do more recording next or will you do live work or will yo go home to the farm and think about it?

K: As I was saying, I really don't know. I want to do both so badly - the logical move would be to tour next but I'm so worried about making that decision, it's a long piece of time to give away and I want to do an album so badly. It's very difficult for me at this time to choose. I hope that as the months pass now with this promotion the answer will clink in my head - it always does that at the last minute”.

This is an interview that I had not come across before but was interested to seek out. I love Never for Ever. It is very much an underrated album. In the production seat, Bush was expanding her horizons and making very different musical compared to that on The Kick Inside and Lionheart. The interview above is really illuminating. Many people might not be aware of a lot of Kate Bush’s print interviews - as they are quite old and have been archived. As you can see above, she provided fresh perspectives and revelations…

err.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Angelo Deligio/Mondadori via Getty Images

FOR every album.

FEATURE: The Lockdown Playlist: Mercury Prize Winners

FEATURE:

 

 

The Lockdown Playlist

www.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Michael Kiwanuka won last year’s Mercury Prize for his album, KIWANUKA/PHOTO CREDIT: Eleonora C. Collini 

Mercury Prize Winners

___________

I realise that we are not…

qqq.jpg

 IN THIS IMAGE: Primal Scream’s third studio album, Screamadelica, won the first Mercury Prize (formerly called the Mercury Music Prize) in 1992

really in lockdown anymore but, as I want to put out regular playlists, I will keep the name. I am doing another playlist around the Mercury Prize, as the shortlist for this year is going to be announced very soon. Here are some more details about when the nominees will be announced and when the event takes place:

“The shortlist of the twelve 2021 Hyundai Mercury Prize ‘Albums of the Year’ will be announced on Thursday, 22 July 2021.

The Hyundai Mercury Prize recognises the best new British & Irish music, celebrating artistic achievement across an eclectic range of contemporary music genres. Hyundai has been the title sponsor of the Prize for the past 5 years, supporting extraordinary artists that drive progress not just in the UK but across the world.

The 2021 Hyundai Mercury Prize Awards Show will be held at the Eventim Apollo, Hammersmith on Thursday, 9 September 2021 (subject to Government guidelines).

The Awards Show will celebrate the twelve shortlisted artists & albums – and the evening will culminate in the announcement of the overall winner of the 2021 Hyundai Mercury Prize for Album of the Year. The Prize’s broadcast partner BBC Music will be providing television and radio coverage of the event”.

Looking ahead to a shortlist that is going to feature some phenomenal albums, this Lockdown Playlist is all about previous winners. Included is a track from each album that has won the Mercury Prize since its first year back in 1992. Here is a selection of…

SONGS from some truly amazing albums.

FEATURE: Beating Around the Proverbial: The Limitations of Artists Covering Kate Bush – and Why They Don’t Tell the Whole Story

FEATURE:

 

 

Beating Around the Proverbial

aaa.jpg

The Limitations of Artists Covering Kate Bush – and Why They Don’t Tell the Whole Story

___________

WHILST one can never begrudge…

skdkjd.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in a still from the video of Experiment IV (from 1986’s The Whole Story)

artists covering Kate Bush’s music, I do feel like there are issues. Bush herself, as I have explored before, was quite wide-ranging when covering others – from Elton John, to The Beatles and traditional songs, she has never been shy about keeping things varied and not restricting herself! It is a bit irksome when artists cover the same song. As NME reported, Car Seat Headrest are the latest to cover a well-trodden Kate Bush song, Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God). Georgia covered the same song not too long ago. I can understand why people gravitate towards the track - though no cover is especially radical! Once you have heard a cover or two, you don’t need artists doing it again. I wonder whether Car Seat Headrest considered other Kate Bush songs. It seems a bit Route 1 going for one of her best-known songs. There are playlists of artists covering Kate Bush songs. As you can see, there are few non-singles/deep cuts explored. Even though there have been some fine covers of Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God), it has been overdone now! Other notable covers stick close to the singles and do not tread past the oft-heard. This probably ties into my moan about radio stations playing the same Kate Bush songs. If artists are not massive fans, are they covering a Bush song that gets played a lot – the assumption that people only want to hear this and, therefore, a cover is a good choice?!

There is this link between stations being very limiting (only playing the hits) and artists not taking the opportunity to cover a less obvious track. Away from the singles, each of Bush’s studio albums has a song that warrants covering. I know that a few of her deeper cuts have been covered. It doesn’t happen that often. Kite and Room for the Life are two songs from The Kick Inside that have not been tackled too much. Lionheart’s Full House and Kashka from Baghdad would warrant new inspection. Every album after that has these gems that are not played on radio much and people do not know a lot about. Not to blame artists exclusively for a lack of imagination. I suppose they are either covering Kate Bush songs that mean a lot to them or ones that they feel they can do a good job with. I get a feeling that many are being rather lazy with covers and have not listened to other tracks. I don’t think the world needs another take on a song like Hounds of Love or Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God). How about more artists reinterpreting a song like The Dreaming’s Pull Out the Pin or Get Out of My House? Again, those songs have been done, though not very often. We have entire swathes of Kate Bush songs that have not been covered at all. It is ironic that, in a year where we celebrate the thirty-fifth anniversary of a Kate Bush greatest hits collection called The Whole Story, many people do not know the whole story regarding Bush’s music!

I do like a good cover version, regardless of what song is approached. The song above is an example of a great cover of a Kate Bush single. It is very different to the original. It would be nice, as there is as much love for Bush now as any other time, to get artists to dip down and provide new exposure to songs that get overlooked. This is especially true for big artists. How many major musicians have covered a Kate Bush song that wasn’t a single or is played a lot on the radio? It is not many! Rather than this being a rant on my part, cover versions, like radio play, helps gets Bush’s work to new generations. I do fear that, for an artist who is lauded because she is an albums artist, so many of the hits are being covered – whereas the album tracks are never even considered. Maybe this will change through the years. Although an act like Car Seat Headrest providing yet another cover of a song that has been hammered quite a bit is not so bad, it does show a lack of taking an opportunity or showing real knowledge of Bush’s work. If you spend some time listening to her albums, there are so many songs that are relatively untouched where artists could provide something magnificent! It is brilliant that radio stations play Kate Bush’s music and fellow artists cover her songs. Unfortunately, because the lesser-known songs are rarely played or covered, they are really not telling…

THE whole story.

FEATURE: The Lockdown Playlist: The Best of Alison Krauss

FEATURE:

 

 

The Lockdown Playlist

The Best of Alison Krauss

___________

FOR this Lockdown Playlist…

 PHOTO CREDIT: Decca/Universal

I am celebrating the upcoming fiftieth birthday of a fantastic musician. Alison Krauss is fifty on 23rd July. She is an amazing American Bluegrass-Country singer and musician. To mark her birthday, the playlist is a selection of her best songs. Before getting to that, it is worth compiling some biography. AllMusic can assist with that:

“With her silky vocals, warm personality, and estimable skills as a fiddler, Alison Krauss helped bring bluegrass to a new audience with music that stayed true to the roots of the style while adding appeal for country and pop audiences. Blending bluegrass with folk and country accents, Krauss was instantly acclaimed from the start of her career, but it wasn't until her platinum-selling 1995 compilation Now That I've Found You that she became a mainstream star. Between her 1987 debut Too Late to Cry and Now That I've Found You, she matured from a child prodigy to a versatile, ambitious, and diverse musician and, in the process, made some of the freshest bluegrass of the late '80s and early '90s. Later, with her appearance on the soundtrack to the film O Brother, Where Art Thou? and a collaborative project with Robert Plant, Krauss won the recognition of the mainstream pop audience without compromising her musical ideals along the way.

When she was five years old, Krauss began playing the violin, taking classical lessons. She soon tired of the regimen of classical playing and began performing country and bluegrass licks. At the age of eight, she began entering talent contests in and around her native Champaign, IL. Two years later, she had her own band. In 1983, when she was 12 years old, she won the Illinois State Fiddle Championship and the Society for the Preservation of Bluegrass in America named her the Most Promising Fiddler in the Midwest. In 1985, Krauss made her recording debut on an album, playing on a record made by her brother Viktor, Jim Hoiles, and Bruce Weiss. The album was called Different Strokes and appeared on the independent Fiddle Tunes label. Later that year, she signed to Rounder Records. She was 14 years old at the time.

Too Late to Cry, Krauss' debut album, appeared in 1987 to very positive reviews. The album was recorded with Krauss' backup band, the Union Station, which featured guitarist Jeff White, banjoist Alison Brown, and bassist Viktor Krauss; the following year, the group won the Society for the Preservation of Bluegrass in America's National Band Championship contest. In 1989, Krauss and Union Station released Two Highways, which was nominated for the Grammy Award for Best Bluegrass Recording. Although the album didn't win the award, her next album, 1990's I've Got That Old Feeling, did. The success of I've Got That Old Feeling was unprecedented for bluegrass acts in the '80s and it laid the groundwork for Krauss' breakthrough in the '90s. By this time, Union Station's lineup had more or less settled. It now featured mandolinist Adam Steffey, banjoist/guitarist Ron Block, bassist Barry Bales, and guitarist Tim Stafford; Stafford later left the group and was replaced by Dan Tyminski.

In 1992, Alison Krauss & Union Station released Every Time You Say Goodbye, which featured a typically eclectic array of material. The album appeared in the country charts and Krauss' videos were shown on Country Music Television. I Know Who Holds Tomorrow was released in 1994 and was even more successful. But it was the 1995 compilation Now That I've Found You: A Collection that made Krauss a star. The album reached number two on the country charts and -- even more remarkably -- went into the pop Top Ten and sold over a million copies. Its success confirmed her status as bluegrass' leading light in the '90s.

Krauss & Union Station followed the unexpected success of Now That I've Found You with So Long, So Wrong in spring 1997. Forget About It followed in mid-1999. A year later, Krauss & Union Station joined the likes of John Hartford, Ralph Stanley, and others for the multi-million-selling soundtrack O Brother, Where Art Thou? A North American tour showcasing some of the album's stellar musicians followed in summer 2002, allowing Krauss and her band's popularity to soar. New Favorite appeared in November and went gold within four months. A live album followed soon after, and in 2004 Krauss released Lonely Runs Both Ways. A Hundred Miles or More, a collection drawn from Krauss' Rounder albums, along with sides recorded for various soundtrack projects and five previously unreleased tracks, appeared in 2007. Also appearing in 2007 was Raising Sand, an acclaimed, multi-platinum collaboration with Robert Plant. She was back with Union Station for 2011’s Paper Airplane, which was self-produced by the band and engineered by Mike Shipley.

In 2013, Krauss began work on a solo album with producer Buddy Cannon, but between dealing with vocal problems and extensive touring with Union Station, it wasn't until 2017 that the album was released. A collection of classic tunes performed in the countrypolitan style, Windy City was also Krauss' first album for Capitol after a long association with Rounder”.

Here is a selection of brilliant songs that feature the rare and obvious talents of Alison Krauss. I hope that, on 23rd July, Krauss has…

A fantastic day.

FEATURE: Groovelines: The Cardigans - Lovefool

FEATURE:

 

 

Groovelines

www.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: The Cardigans photographed circa 1997/PHOTO CREDIT: Andy Willsher/Redferns/Getty Images

The Cardigans - Lovefool

___________

IN September…

qqq.jpg

there are two big anniversaries regarding The Cardigans. The Swedish band released their debut album, First Band on the Moon, on 17th September, 1996. The album’s first single, Lovefool, was released on 14th September, 1996. It is amazing to think that a song that strong was released so early in their career! It is a classic that is almost twenty-five. I remember when the song came out. In high school, I loved the Pop music that was in the charts. I don’t think I knew about The Cardigans prior to Lovefool’s release. I was instantly smitten. I especially loved Nina Persson’s incredible voice. Wikipedia give us some background regarding the song:

"Lovefool is a song written by Peter Svensson and Nina Persson for Swedish rock band the Cardigans' third studio album, First Band on the Moon (1996). It was released as the album's lead single on 9 September 1996 in the United Kingdom and internationally on 5 October 1996.

Following a re-release in 1997, "Lovefool" found international success, peaking at number two on the UK Singles Chart and achieving moderate success on other European charts. In North America, it reached number three in Canada and number two on the US Billboard Hot 100 Airplay Chart (it did not appear on the Hot 100 due to rules in place at the time). In Australasia, the song topped the New Zealand Singles Chart and climbed to number 11 in Australia, earning Gold sales certifications in both regions”.

If you have not heard the album, First Band on the Moon, I would urge you to do so. It is an interesting album with many gems. Your New Cuckoo is a song from The Cardigans one does not hear much. I am surprised that a song as instant and brilliant as Lovefool appears so low down the album tracklist (it is the seventh track). Also on the album is a brilliant cover of Black Sabbath’s Iron Man. That goes to show how confident The Cardigans were right from the off! I think that Lovefool is one of the most memorable songs from the ‘90s. One need only hear a few seconds of the introduction to know what it is! One feels warmer when they hear the song. Although Lovefool is quite a simple song, it resonates because of the musicianship of the band and Persson’s intoxicating voice. The video is also pretty fantastic! Nearly twenty-five years after it was released into the world, Lovefool still sounds fresh. You might listen to a song like this today and not feel as though it is out of step with the current times. That said, there have been a lot of artists making music inspired by the 1990s. Five years ago, Billboard marked twenty years of a classic track. Nina Persson reflected on a song that was a huge chart success in 1997:

“Twenty years ago today, a Swedish alt-pop band called The Cardigans released a single very much unlike anything else they'd recorded, but which would change the course of the band's career.

"Lovefool" -- the uber-earworm from the band's third studio album, First Band on the Moon -- swiftly became a hit in Europe but didn't debut internationally until Oct. 5, 1996. "We put out that song and record and embarked on a long tour, so in one way, nothing changed for us," frontwoman Nina Persson told Billboard recently over the phone from Los Angeles, where she was preparing to play a show with Local Natives. "Then the movie came out" -- that would be BazLuhrmann's '90s-defining Romeo + Juliet -- "and the U.S. caught on tremendously."

After Romeo + Juliet was released on Nov. 1, 1996, "Lovefool" debuted on the Adult Pop Songs chart dated Nov. 30 at No. 39. It then hit the Radio Songs chart the following week, peaking at No. 2 and staying there for eight nonconsecutive weeks. It spent seven weeks at No. 1 on the Pop Songs airplay chart, beginning with the Feb. 22, 1997-dated tally. (The song did not chart on the Billboard Hot 100 chart, because at the time, non-commercially available songs -- like "Lovefool" -- were not eligible to chart on the list.)

As Persson recalls today, "Lovefool" felt like an odd fit for The Cardigans. "We definitely were aware that it was a single and a catchy song when we wrote it, but the direction it took is not something we could have predicted," Persson says. "It wasn't necessarily our character; it felt like a bit of a freak on the record -- which, objectively, it still is." The song's upbeat feel wasn't the band's initial intention. "Before we recorded it, it was slower and more of a bossa nova," Persson says. "It's quite a sad love song; the meaning of it is quite pathetic, really. But then when we were recording, by chance, our drummer started to play that kind of disco beat, and there was no way to get away from it after that."

The band had already shot a different music video for the U.K. and Europe -- "much more bleak, much more our original style," Persson says. "We had an actor playing a sort of handsome-man-love-interest of mine, and he was supposed to be a kind of gangster and the band played his gang members." But thanks to the success of Romeo + Juliet, another video debuted and became ubiquitous on MTV, cementing Persson's public image as a flaxen-haired pixie floating at sea, a message in a bottle in human form. Watch the MTV staple below, as well as a side-by-side comparison of the two videos:

Persson acknowledges she and her bandmates weren't initially thrilled by the success of "Lovefool." "It took over our whole existence, and it wasn't something we totally identified with," she says today. The Cardigans played it on Beverly Hills, 90210 and on the morning talk show circuit; Persson remembers being "freaked out" when she'd see the video on screens in American clothing stores. "We were kind of snobs," she acknowledges. "We felt like these things were glitzy, and we felt like, 'No, no, we're a rock band!'"

sss.jpg

 But today, with the distance of two decades, she's able to look on the song a bit more kindly. "Now, we see it from the other end, and we're proud and thankful," she says. The band happily plays "Lovefool" in concert. And as Persson herself wrote on her Instagram on the anniversary of the song's U.K. release: "We love you, sweet nuisance!”.

Although the band became defined by Lovefool, it is good that Persson and The Cardigans look back fondly and are appreciative. It must have been strange, in 1996 (and 1997), having a song that big on your hands. No matter what they put out after that, they would have had to match the success and sound of Lovefool. The 1990s produced many glorious songs that will be remembered for decades. There are few as potent, sweet, moving and timeless as Lovefool. I wonder whether The Cardigans will mark twenty-five years of the song in September. It is a track that is played a lot to this day. It is reaching new generations. Such a blissful song, there is also this note of heartbreak woven through. Such a skilfully-written track that is performed beautifully! Taken from the simply excellent debut album, First Band on the Moon, Lovefool is an iconic track. I first heard it when it came back, yet I do not tire of hearing it now. It brings back fond memory. It also hits me in different ways every time I approach it. Lovefool means a lot to different people. Everyone has their own experiences with the song. There is no doubt that the song is…

ONE that is very dear to me.

FEATURE: Life for the Room: Kate Bush’s Music and How Dance Inspired Her Sense of Expression and Curiosity

FEATURE:

 

 

Life for the Room

dxc.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in London in 1978/PHOTO CREDIT: Gered Mankowitz

Kate Bush’s Music and How Dance Inspired Her Sense of Expression and Curiosity

___________

BY next summer…

sssxxxx.jpg

I hope to have recorded and produced something that celebrates forty-five years of The Kick Inside’s existence. Kate Bush’s debut album was released in February 1978, though it was recorded in the summer in 1977. I have been spending a lot of time with the album lately. I will move on very soon. Whilst researching and reading (for the nth time!) Graeme Thomson’s must-read biography of Bush, Under the Ivy: The Life & Music of Kate Bush, new things jumped to life and got inside my head. Whilst I am not going to quote from the book directly, most of the observations and thoughts here are from that book. One listens to albums such as 1982’s The Dreaming or 1985’s Hounds of Love and experiences these immersive songs and moments that are so expressive and otherworldly. One might not be aware of the importance of dance and movement that Bush acquired at a young age. Listen to The Kick Inside, and there are songs from a young woman who is free and unabashed. She talks about lust and sexual desire in a frank, honest and beautiful way. She was raised in a liberal household where she was encouraged to be free-spirited. Her brother, John (Jay) wrote poetry that was explicit and sensual. It showed that she did not have to be limited and could explore her desires and fantasies in a very personal, adult and original way.

Compared to a lot of what was in mainstream music in 1978, songs from The Kick Inside explored sex and physical exploration in a different and refreshingly memorable way. Bush was encouraged to poeticise her life. Because of that, her wordplay, imagery and sense of expression is vivacious, imaginative and unhindered by convention. Folk music that was abundant in her house portrayed images of spirts, ghosts, strange characters and the extraordinary. It was not escapism. It was the opposite of that. One can hear this influence through The Kick Inside. When it comes to the captivating early videos and how physical and expressive her lyrics are, dance classes played a big role. Although Bush was invested and interested in dance as a young child, one can look back to 1973. There was interest in her in 1973 (and before). In that year, she recorded with Pink Floyd’s David Gilmour in the summer. Ten-twenty songs were recorded then. It was not until 1975 when Bush reconnected with Gilmour, where she recorded professional at AIR Studios, London with producer Andrew Powell (who produced The Kick Inside). It was took until July 1976 when Bush was signed to EMI Records (at just sixteen years old; she was put on retainer for two years by Bob Mercer. They give her an advance of £3,000 to develop and widen her talent). I am going off on a tangent a bit. Between 1973-1975 there was this period of limbo, where Bush was spotted and eager but she was a long way from being ready to record a full album.

In the time, she practised dance at East Wickham Farm. Whilst quite modest and fairly basic, it was Bush understanding the importance of dance and movement. In terms of what she was dancing to, I think The Beatles’ Eleanor Rigby was one. It was not exactly intense, theatrical or especially upbeat! The lightbulb moment came when Bush saw a production of Lindsay Kemp’s Flowers. She saw it at the Collegiate Theatre, Bloomsbury in 1975. This was a show that opened Bush’s mind and spirit. Here is some information regarding the production:

“Inspiration: Kemp’s extremely free interpretation of Genet’s novel “Our Lady of the Flowers”, with himself playing the central role of Divine, a transvestite transcending gender in a world of criminals, whores and angels: prisons and sexual fantasies, Genet’s verbal violence and poetry transformed into music and gesture, silence and stillness. A dreamlike journey to destruction, through seduction, shock, laughter, poetry and total emotion”.

With nothing like this on her school curriculum at the time (as you’d imagine!), the experience influenced her decision to leave school. In 1976, at the cost of 50 pence per session, she attended Lindsay Kemp’s mime class. Bush also took dance classes at the Dance Center, Covent Garden. The late Kemp recalls seeing Bush at his classes and observing a shy-but-eager student. Soon enough, she started to come out of herself and became more confident – a long way from the coy student who would stand at the back of the room and needed to be brought out of a state of meekness.

Another instrumental moment came when Bush started working alongside American dance instructor, Robin Kovac. She helped Bush deflate her inhibitions. There was real growth in terms of Bush’s creative output from 1973. Her songs were less melancholic and had stronger melodic hooks. It is no coincidence that dance entering Bush’s world resulted in huge creativity. The more she explored and practiced, the better her work became; the more distinct and original work she produced. Songs written at 44 Wickham Road included Hammer Horror, Oh, to Be in Love and Them Heavy People. Not that Bush’s songs were ordinary or lacked expression before she became more engaged with dance. I don’t think the world would have witnessed songs as moving and physical as Them Heavy People were it not for dance and how Bush became far less constricted. Robin Kovac’s teachings and instruction is interesting. Martha Graham’s ‘contraction’ technique was adapted by Kovac. Among the techniques taught was a movement that was akin to being stabbed in the stomach and then rounding the back (similar, in a sense, to a contraction). The choreography for Bush’s Wuthering Heights (her debut single released January 1978) was rehearsed quickly at a flat in Archway Road for a modest £30. Even though, when asked in an interview, Bush credited Lindsay Kemp as being important in terms of Wuthering Heights’ choreography, it was Kovac who should have got credit (Bush wrote her a letter of apology later and mentioned her in some big interviews).

This new world of dance and experimentation linked into the music and created this fascinated sonic world full of life and movement. Bush was not keen on overly-confessional and emotive female songwriters who were stuck on the piano (Carole King was one artist Bush named who fell into this mould). If EMI wanted Bush to be more like Joni Mitchell (her obvious femininity and striking looks led them to think this way), Bush had other plans! Perhaps more inspired by artists like David Bowie, Roxy Music and Captain Beefheart, her music and style was much more dynamic and physical; far less about traditional love songs and static heartbreak. Graeme Thomson noted, in his biography of Bush, how two intense periods of dance (1978-1977 and 1983-1984) coincide with a flourish and explosion of songwriting creativity. The second spell was when Bush reconnected with dance prior to recording Hounds of Love. I think that the likes of Lindsay Kemp and Robin Kovac were crucial when it came to Bush evolving as a songwriter and performer. Her live experience with the KT Bush Band (as the Kate Bush Encyclopaedia explains: “When Kate Bush started recording her debut album The Kick Inside, she actually recorded versions of 'Them Heavy People' and 'James And The Cold Gun' at De Wolfe Studios in London with the KT Bush Band, but in the end, the band members were not used for the album recordings. Also, an attempt to release a single of the KT Bush Band's version of Johnny Winter's 'Shame Shame Shame', recorded at Graphic Sound studios in Catford was halted either by Kate's family or EMI Records. Although many of the band's gigs were filmed, photographed and recorded, none of these have surfaced” ) also helped when it came to her sense of expression and movement in her songwriting - in addition to when she was in the studio. Bush dedicated The Kick Inside’s opening track, Moving (where she talks about the lily in her soul being crushed as she blossomed and bloomed), to Lindsay Kemp. The love of dance and mime Bush adopted very early in her career took her music and career…  

TO new heights.

FEATURE: Inspired By… Part Nineteen: Taylor Swift

FEATURE:

 

 

Inspired By…

PHOTO CREDIT: Beth Garrabrant

Part Nineteen: Taylor Swift

___________

AS is common…

qqq.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: James Reynolds

when I do these features, I am going to include a lot of biographical information about an iconic artist. Today, I am focusing on Taylor Swift. One of the most influential artists of the modern age, she released two tremendous albums last year in the form of folklore and evermore. Before getting to a playlist of songs from artists inspired by Swift, here is some biography from AllMusic:

“Taylor Swift is that rarest of pop phenomena: a superstar who managed to completely cross over from country to the mainstream. Others have performed similar moves -- notably, Dolly Parton and Willie Nelson both became enduring pop-culture icons based on their '70s work -- but Swift shed her country roots like they were a second skin; it was a necessary molting to reveal she was perhaps the sharpest, savviest populist singer/songwriter of her generation, one who could harness the zeitgeist, make it personal and, just as impressively, perform the reverse. These skills were evident on her earliest hits, especially the neo-tribute "Tim McGraw," but her second album, 2008's Fearless, showcased a songwriter discovering who she was and, in the process, finding a mass audience. Fearless wound up having considerable legs not only in the U.S., where it racked up six platinum singles on the strength of the Top Ten hits "Love Story" and "You Belong with Me," but throughout the world, performing particularly well in the U.K., Canada, and Australia. Speak Now, delivered almost two years later, consolidated that success and moved Swift into the stratosphere of superstardom. Her popularity only increased over her next three albums -- Red (2012), 1989 (2014), Reputation (2017) -- and found her moving assuredly into a pop realm where she already belonged. Even when she scaled back her approach with stripped-down sibling releases folklore and Evermore, she maintained her position atop the pop world while delivering the best-selling album of 2020.

This sense of confidence had been apparent in Taylor Swift since the beginning. The daughter of two bankers -- her father, Scott Kingsley Swift, worked at Merrill Lynch; her mother, Andrea, spent time as a mutual fund marketing executive -- Swift was born in Reading, Pennsylvania, and raised in suburban Wyomissing. She began to show interest in music at the age of nine, and Shania Twain wound up as her biggest formative influence. Swift started to work regularly at local talent contests, eventually winning a chance to open for Charlie Daniels. Soon, she learned how to play guitar and began writing songs, signing a music management deal with Dan Dymtrow; her family relocated to Nashville with the intent of furthering her music career. She was just 14 years old but on the radar of the music industry, signing a development deal with RCA Records in 2004. Swift sharpened her skills with a variety of professional songwriters, forming the strongest connections with Liz Rose. Taylor's original songs earned her a deal with Sony/ATV Music Publishing, but not long after that 2004 deal she parted ways with Dymtrow and RCA, all with the intent of launching her recording career now, not later.

Things started moving swiftly once Swift came to the attention of Scott Borchetta, a former DreamWorks Records exec about to launch Big Machine Records. Borchetta saw Swift perform at a songwriters showcase at the Bluebird Cafe and he signed her to Big Machine in 2005; shortly afterward, she started work on her debut with producer Nathan Chapman, who'd previously helmed demos for Taylor. Boasting original song credits on every one of the record's 11 songs (she penned three on her own), Taylor Swift appeared in October 2006 to strong reviews and Swift made sure to work the album hard, appearing at every radio or television event offered and marshaling a burgeoning fan base through the use of MySpace. "Tim McGraw," the first song from the album, did well, but "Teardrops on My Guitar" and "Our Song" did better on both the pop and country charts, where she racked up five consecutive Top Ten singles. Other successes followed in the wake of the debut -- a Grammy nomination for Best New Artist (she lost to Amy Winehouse), stopgap EPs of Christmas songs -- but Swift concentrated on delivering her sophomore set, Fearless.

Valentine's Day [Original Motion Picture Soundtrack]Appearing in November 2008, Fearless was certified gold by the RIAA in its first week of release, and the record gained momentum throughout 2009, earning several platinum certifications as "Love Story," "White Horse," "You Belong with Me," "Fifteen," and "Fearless" all scaled the upper reaches of the country charts while "You Belong with Me" nearly topped Billboard's Hot 100. Along with the success came some headlines, first in the form of an infamous appearance at the 2009 MTV Video Music Awards where her acceptance speech was interrupted by Kanye West, who burst on-stage to declare that Swift's rival Beyoncé deserved the award more, but her romances also started gaining attention, notably a liaison with Twilight star Taylor Lautner, who appeared with the singer in the 2009 film Valentine's Day.

Her flirtation with the silver screen proved brief, as she then poured herself into her third album, Speak Now. Released in October 2010, Speak Now was another massive first-week smash that refused to lose momentum. Hit singles like "Mine" and "Mean," which won two Grammy Awards, played a big factor in its success not just on the country charts but on pop radio as well. Following a 2011 live album called World Tour Live: Speak Now, Swift turned toward following a pop path on her fourth album, hiring such mainstream musicians as Dan Wilson, Butch Walker, and Britney Spears producer Max Martin. This mainstream pulse was evident on "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together," the first single from Red. Upon its October 2012 release, Red shattered expectations by selling over a million copies in its first week, a notable achievement that was doubly impressive in an era of declining sales. Once again, Swift's album had legs: it was certified platinum four times in the U.S. and its international sales outstripped those of Speak Now. She supported Red with an international tour in 2013 and more hits came, including "I Knew You Were Trouble" and "22."

As Swift geared up for the release of her fifth album in 2014, she made it clear that 1989 was designed as her first "documented, official" pop album and that there would be no country marketing push for the record. "Shake It Off," an ebullient dance-pop throwback, hit number one upon its August 2014 release. When 1989 appeared in late October 2014, it once again shot to number one and became her third straight album to sell one million copies in its first week (a new record for any artist).

Fifty Shades Darker [Original Motion Picture Soundtrack]Swift gathered many awards during the subsequent year, including Billboard's Woman of the Year, the Award for Excellence at the American Music Awards, and a special 50th Anniversary Milestone Award from the CMAs. Her 1989 World Tour crossed Asia, North America, and Europe during the last half of 2015, and she won three Grammy Awards at the 2016 ceremonies, including Album of the Year, Best Pop Vocal Album, and Best Music Video for "Bad Blood." At the end of 2016, she released "I Don't Wanna Live Forever," a duet with ZAYN from the soundtrack for Fifty Shades Darker. The single reached the Top Five across the world. Swift returned with her sixth album, Reputation, in November 2017. Preceded by the number one hit single "Look What You Made Me Do," Reputation debuted at number one, and while it didn't replicate the success of 1989, the album did help underscore her popularity while also pushing her toward mature musicality.

Reputation was Swift's final record for Big Machine. In November 2018, she signed with Universal Music Group, which distributed her new albums under its Republic Records banner. The first album in this contract was Lover. Released in August 2019, Lover was preceded by two singles, "Me!" and "You Need to Calm Down," which both reached number two on the Hot 100 and helped push the album to number one. The acclaimed LP and two of its singles received a total of three nominations at the 62nd Grammy Awards.

Swift's plans to support Lover with a tour in 2020 were scrapped due to the COVID-19 pandemic. With some unexpected time on her hands, she wrote and recorded a new set of songs, many in collaboration with Aaron Dessner of the National; Bon Iver and longtime Swift associate Jack Antonoff also contributed. The resulting album, folklore, was released on July 24, 2020, and went straight to the top of the Billboard 200. Less than five months later, Swift released a companion album to folklore called Evermore. Featuring many of the same collaborators as its predecessor, Evermore debuted at number one upon its December 11, 2020 release. Altogether, the sibling LPs planted Swift atop the U.S. charts for a combined 11 weeks, and folklore became the best-selling album of 2020.

Fearless [Taylor's Version]In 2021, she began the process of re-recording her back catalog after her Big Machine masters were sold off in 2019, starting with 2008's Fearless. The first of these tracks -- "Love Story (Taylor's Version)" -- arrived that February, with Fearless (Taylor's Version) arriving in April. The new version of Fearless contained cameos from Colbie Caillat, Keith Urban, and Maren Morris, along with several previously unheard tunes originally written during the same time period”.

To show the impact Taylor Swift has had on other artists, the playlist below features those who have either cited her as impactful or have been influenced by her music in some way. Only in her early-thirties, it is amazing what Swift has achieved and how huge her legacy is already! In Taylor Swift, the world is lucky to have…

A future icon.

FEATURE: Something Like a Song: A Track from Each of Kate Bush’s Studio Albums That I Either Overlook or Have Gained a New Respect For

FEATURE:

 

 

Something Like a Song

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in a promotional shot for 2011’s Director’s Cut

A Track from Each of Kate Bush’s Studio Albums That I Either Overlook or Have Gained a New Respect For

___________

IN this feature…

qqq.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush promoting Hounds of Love at the London Planetarium on 9th September, 1985/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

I am reminded of my recent run of pieces where I ranked the tracks on Kate Bush’s studio albums. I listen to all of her studio albums, though there is invariably one track from each that I have either overlooked or not listened to as much as I should – the underrated one that I have gained new respect for (it recently happened with In Search of Peter Pan from 1978’s Lionheart). As much as I love The Kick Inside and Hounds of Love, I have been listening back and realising that there is a song from each that has been slightly neglected. Maybe we have the same approach when we listen to albums or have a love for a particular artist. I guess one doesn’t necessarily listen to and love every track from every album - though there are tracks from Kate Bush’s albums I have gained new love for (and very much seen them in a new light0. Some might say that this would simply be me choosing the bottom-ranked song from my rankings list. That is not the case. It is not necessarily a song I considered to be less strong that has gained new significance. This rundown selects that single track (from each album) that I maybe like but have not heard much recently. There are also those that I dismissed or put aside I have come to become attached to. If you have your similar views regarding Kate Bush’s albums, it would be good to know what tracks you’d select. Here are my single songs from each of the ten studio albums that I have…

111.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in Tokyo, Japan in 1978/PHOTO CREDIT: Koh Hasebe/Shinko Music/Getty Images

LEFT to collect dust for too long.

_____________

The Kick Inside: James and the Cold Gun

qqq.jpg

Release Date (Album): 17th February, 1978

Label: EMI

Producer: Andrew Powell

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 3

Song Information:

“Song written by Kate Bush in the first half of the Seventies and it became one of the songs performed by the KT Bush Band during their performances in the pub circuit in 1977. Brian Bath, member of the band, recalled later: " Rob got a dry ice machine from somewhere. We used that on stage for 'James And The Cold Gun' and it looked great. We had a bit of a show going! Kate did a costume change, she'd put on a bloomin' Western cowgirl dress for the second set! The theatrical thing was starting to get there." Del Palmer recalled: "She was just brilliant, she used to wear this big long white robe with coloured ribbons on or a long black dress with big flowers in her hair. She did the whole thing with the gun and [the audience] just loved it. She'd go around shooting people."

The song was recorded in the studio in 1977 and released on her debut album The Kick Inside. When she embarked on the Tour of Life in 1979, the live performance of 'James And The Cold Gun' used and enhanced elements of those original performances from 1977” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

Lionheart: In Search of Peter Pan

aa.jpg

Release Date (Album): 13th November, 1978

Label: EMI

Producers: Andrew Powell/Kate Bush (Assisted By)

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 6

Song Information:

“Song written by Kate Bush before her debut in 1978. When the album Lionheart was recorded, it was one of seven 'older' songs to be recorded. The song quotes the song 'When You Wish Upon A Star' from the classic Disney film Pinocchio.

There's a song on [Lionheart] called 'In Search Of Peter Pan' and it's sorta about childhood. And the book itself is an absolutely amazing observation on paternal attitudes and the relationships between the parents - how it's reflected on the children. And I think it's a really heavy subject, you know, how a young innocence mind can be just controlled, manipulated, and they don't necessarily want it to happen that way. And it's really just a song about that. (Lionheart promo cassette, EMI Canada, 1978)” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

Never for Ever: Blow Away (For Bill)

sss.jpg

Release Date (Album): 8th September, 1980

Label: EMI

Producers: Kate Bush/Jon Kelly

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 1

Song Information:

“So there's comfort for the guy in my band, as when he dies, he'll go "Hi, Jimi!" It's very tongue-in-cheek, but it's a great thought that if a musician dies, his soul will join all the other musicians and a poet will join all the Dylan Thomases and all that.

None of those people [who have had near-death experiences] are frightened by death anymore. It's almost something they're looking forward to. All of us have such a deep fear of death. It's the ultimate unknown, at the same time it's our ultimate purpose. That's what we're here for. So I thought this thing about the death-fear. I like to think I'm coming to terms with it, and other people are too. The song was really written after someone very special died.

Although the song had been formulating before and had to be written as a comfort to those people who are afraid of dying, there was also this idea of the music, energies in us that aren't physical: art, the love in people. It can't die, because where does it go? It seems really that music could carry on in radio form, radio waves... There are people who swear they can pick up symphonies from Chopin, Schubert. We're really transient, everything to do with us is transient, except for these non-physical things that we don't even control... (Kris Needs, 'Lassie'. Zigzag (UK), November 1985)” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

The Dreaming: Night of the Swallow

Release Date (Album): 13th September, 1980

Label: EMI

Producer: Kate Bush

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 3

Song Information:

“Ever since I heard my first Irish pipe music it has been under my skin, and every time I hear the pipes, it's like someone tossing a stone in my emotional well, sending ripples down my spine. I've wanted to work with Irish music for years, but my writing has never really given me the opportunity of doing so until now. As soon as the song was written, I felt that a ceilidh band would be perfect for the choruses. The verses are about a lady who's trying to keep her man from accepting what seems to be an illegal job. He is a pilot and has been hired to fly some people into another country. No questions are to be asked, and she gets a bad feeling from the situation. But for him, the challenge is almost more exciting than the job itself, and he wants to fly away. As the fiddles, pipes and whistles start up in the choruses, he is explaining how it will be all right. He'll hide the plane high up in the clouds on a night with no moon, and he'll swoop over the water like a swallow.

Bill Whelan is the keyboard player with Planxty, and ever since Jay played me an album of theirs I have been a fan. I rang Bill and he tuned into the idea of the arrangement straight away. We sent him a cassette, and a few days later he phoned the studio and said, "Would you like to hear the arrangement I've written?"

I said I'd love to, but how?

"Well, Liam is with me now, and we could play it over the phone."

I thought how wonderful he was, and I heard him put down the phone and walk away. The cassette player started up. As the chorus began, so did this beautiful music - through the wonder of telephones it was coming live from Ireland, and it was very moving. We arranged that I would travel to Ireland with Jay and the multi-track tape, and that we would record in Windmill Lane Studios, Dublin. As the choruses began to grow, the evening drew on and the glasses of Guiness, slowly dropping in level, became like sand glasses to tell the passing of time. We missed our plane and worked through the night. By eight o'clock the next morning we were driving to the airport to return to London. I had a very precious tape tucked under my arm, and just as we were stepping onto the plane, I looked up into the sky and there were three swallows diving and chasing the flies. (Kate Bush Club newsletter, October 1982)” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

Hounds of Love: The Morning Fog

qqq.jpg

Release Date (Album): 16th September, 1985

Label: EMI

Producer: Kate Bush

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 1

Song Information:

“Song written by Kate Bush. Originally released on her fifth studio album Hounds Of Love. Seventh and last track of The Ninth Wave suite.

Well, that's really meant to be the rescue of the whole situation, where now suddenly out of all this darkness and weight comes light. You know, the weightiness is gone and here's the morning, and it's meant to feel very positive and bright and uplifting from the rest of dense, darkness of the previous track. And although it doesn't say so, in my mind this was the song where they were rescued, where they get pulled out of the water. And it's very much a song of seeing perspective, of really, you know, of being so grateful for everything that you have, that you're never grateful of in ordinary life because you just abuse it totally. And it was also meant to be one of those kind of "thank you and goodnight" songs. You know, the little finale where everyone does a little dance and then the bow and then they leave the stage. [laughs] (Richard Skinner, 'Classic Albums interview: Hounds Of Love. Radio 1 (UK), aired 26 January 1992)” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

The Sensual World: Reaching Out

xzz.jpg

Release Date (Album): 17th October, 1989

Label: EMI

Producer: Kate Bush

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 2

Song Information:

“That was really quick, really straightforward. A walk in the park did that one for me. I really needed one more song to kind of lift the album. I was a bit worried that it was all sort of dark and down. I'd been getting into walks at that time, and just came back and sat at the piano and wrote it, words and all. I had this lovely conversation with someone around the time I was about to start writing it. They were talking about this star that exploded. I thought it was such fantastic imagery. The song was taking the whole idea of how we cling onto things that change - we're always trying to not let things change. I thought it was such a lovely image of people reaching up for a star, and this star explodes. Where's it gone? It seemed to sum it all up really. That's kind of about how you can't hold on to anything because everything is always changing and we all have such a terrible need to hold onto stuff and to keep it exactly how it is, because this is nice and we don't want it to change. But sometimes even if things aren't nice, people don't want them to change. And things do. Just look at the natural balance of things: how if you reach out for something, chances are it will pull away. And when things reach out for you, the chances are you will pull away. You know everything ebbs and flows, and you know the moon is full and then it's gone: it's just the balance of things. (...) We did a really straightforward treatment on the track; did the piano to a clicktrack, got Charlie Morgan [Elton john's drummer] to come in and do the drums, Del did the bass, and Michael Nyman came in to do the strings. I told him it had to have a sense of uplifting, and I really like his stuff - the rawness of his strings. It's a bit like a fuzzbox touch - quite 'punk'. I find that very attractive - he wrote it very quickly. I was very pleased. (Tony Horkins, 'What Katie Did Next'. International Musician, December 1989)” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

The Red Shoes: You're the One

zzz.jpg

Release Date (Album): 2nd November, 1993

Label: EMI

Producer: Kate Bush

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 2

Song Information:

“Drums: Stuart Elliott

Bass: John Giblin

Guitar: Jeff Beck

Hammond: Gary Brooker

Vocals: Trio Bulgarka

Fender Rhodes, keyboards: Kate – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

Kate about 'The Red Shoes'

I've been very affected by these last two years. They've been incredibly intense years for me. Maybe not on a work level, but a lot has happened to me. I feel I've learnt a lot – and, yes, I think [my next album] is going to be quite different… I hope the people that are waiting for it feel it's worth the wait. (BBC Radio 1 interview, 14 December 1991)” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

Aerial: Bertie

qqq.jpg

Release Date (Album): 7th November, 2005

Label: EMI

Producer: Kate Bush

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 3

Song Information:

“He's such a big part of my life so, you know, he's a very big part of my work. It's such a great thing, being able to spend as much time with him as I can. And, you know, he won't be young for very long. And already he's starting to grow up and I wanted to make sure I didn't miss out on that, that I spent as much time with his as I could.

So, the idea was that he would come first, and then the record would come next, which is also one reasons why it's taken a long time (laughs). It always takes me a long time anyway, but trying to fit that in around the edges that were left over from the time that I wanted to spend with him.

It's a wonderful thing, having such a lovely son. Really, you know with a song like that, you could never be special enough from my point of view, and I wanted to try and give it an arrangement that wasn't terribly obvious, so I went for the sort of early music... (Ken Bruce show, BBC Radio 2, 3 November 2005)” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

Director’s Cut: Song of Solomon

Release Date (Album): 16th May, 2011

Labels: Fish People/EMI

Producer: Kate Bush

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 2

Song Information:

“Director's Cut

Ninth album by Kate Bush, released by Fish People on 16 May 2011. The album was written, composed and produced by Kate. It is made up of songs from her earlier albums The Sensual World and The Red Shoes which have been remixed and restructured, three of which were re-recorded completely. All the lead vocals on the album and some of the backing vocals have been entirely re-recorded, with some of the songs transposed to a lower key to accommodate Bush's matured voice. Additionally, the drum tracks have been reconceived and re-recorded – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

Credits (1993)

Percussion: Charlie Morgan, Stuart Elliott

Guitar: Danny McIntosh

Vocals: Trio Bulgarka

Fender Rhodes, Keyboards, Piano: Kate

Credits (2011)

Drums: Steve Gadd

Bass: John Giblin

Guitars: Dan McIntosh

Keyboards: Kate

Vocals: Trio Bulgarka

Backing vocals: Kate

Gabriel: David Crofts

Marion: Kate

Toll: Remi Butler” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

50 Words for Snow: Snowed in at Wheeler Street

ccc.jpg

Release Date (Album): 21st November, 2011

Label: Fish People

Producer: Kate Bush

Album Chart Position (U.K.): 3

Song Information:

“Kate about 'Snowed In At Wheeler Street'

The idea is that there are two lovers, two souls who keep on meeting up in different periods of time. So they meet in Ancient Rome and then they meet again walking through time. But each time something happens to tear them apart. (...) It’s like two old souls that keep on meeting up. (John Doran, 'A Demon In The Drift: Kate Bush Interviewed'. The Quietus, 2011)

Credits

Featured vocal: Elton John

Drums: Steve Gadd

Bass: John Giblin

Guitars: Dan McIntosh

Piano, keyboards: Kate” – Kate Bush Encyclopaedia

FEATURE: A High Street Institution: HMV at 100

FEATURE:

 

 

A High Street Institution

PHOTO CREDIT: HMV

HMV at 100

___________

A very special anniversary…

sas.jpg

 IMAGE CREDIT: HMV

is about to be marked. On 20th July, 1921 the first HMV store was opened on London's Oxford Street. We are about to mark a century of, to me, a high street institution! Although the chain has suffered some mixed fortunes fairly recently, there is a feeling of resurgence and future planning. During a pandemic, mixed with the fact that streaming has a massive place in the music world, one would expect a chain like HMV to struggle or go out of business. Whilst some of its stores have closed, it does seem that things are looking bright. I am going to provide some explanations why, though it is worth getting some background. Here is some history about HMV:

“hmv is a leading specialist retailer of music, film, games and technology products, with over 120 stores around the UK, offering a wide selection of new release and catalogue titles.

The hmv brand, made famous by the iconic image of the ‘dog and trumpet’ trademark featuring ‘Nipper, is practically synonymous with the very history and development of British popular music and culture.  Hmv’s rich heritage as a retail specialist stretches back over 90 years to 20th July 1921 when its first store in London’s Oxford Street was officially opened by the celebrated British composer and conductor, Sir Edward Elgar.

Since that time hmv has made music and entertainment available to its customers in every format imaginable: from sheet music and the earliest gramophone 78s to today’s digital downloads. On the way hmv has, of course, notably also taken in vinyl singles and albums, cassettes and CDs as well as film and TV content on VHS, DVD & Blu-ray and games titles across all platforms.  More recently still hmv has gone ‘back to the future’ by carrying the latest portable technology such as headphones and tablets. 

As one of the first high street brands to recognise the passion that so many of us have for music, film and games, hmv virtually invented the idea of instore events and product launches, and over the years many of the world’s greatest artistes have appeared in its stores to meet their fans, sometimes to perform live or occasionally just to shop.  From recording giants such as Elgar and Yehudi Menuhin in its very earliest days to icons including Cliff Richard, Kate Bush, Paul McCartney, Michael Jackson, Madonna, David Bowie, Beyonce, Amy Winehouse and Quentin Tarantino and more recently Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber and One Direction, hmv has hosted them all.

In its first few decades hmv traded principally from its main London flagship store and supplied own-label products to recognised dealers around the country on a franchise basis, but all that changed with the advent of first Elvis then the Beatles in the late Fifties and early Sixties and explosion of popular culture that followed.  More HMV stores began to open around London and then gradually the rest of the country as the chain began to take shape and expand during the Seventies. But it was really in the Eighties, through the combined catalyst of Liveaid in 1985 and the advent of the compact disc around the same time that hmv really took off as a leading retail brand with a national footprint.

hmv continued to expand through the 1990s, reaching 100 stores in 1997. The launch of the DVD format in the late 1990s propelled the hmv’s growth for the following decade with the company exceeding 200 UK stores in 2004”.

zzszs.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Doug Putman

I know that some stores have closed and there have been occasions when HMV looked doomed. I think the fact that Doug Putman took over and has helped to rejuvenate HMV means that there is some stability. It seems that physical music is not going anywhere. People love it, and there is this demand for something tangible. The experience of shopping and buying music this way is going to increase and take on a new lease when COVID-19 restrictions ease. At present, the chain is excited to celebrate a hundred years on the high street. Most of us have some experience of HMV. In a recent interview with Music Week, Doug Putman spoke about the anniversary - and how HMV has fared some challenging times:

“In the latest edition of Music Week, we mark the anniversary with an eight-page special on HMV, including interviews with owner Doug Putman, MD Phil Halliday and marketing boss Patrizia Leighton, plus long-term events supremo Simon Winter - and we hear from the industry about their HMV memories.

HMV has been through tough times in the past decade - including two periods of administration - and the lockdowns during the pandemic.

But the retailer is now open again and has seen its vinyl strategy under new owner Doug Putman pay off as the format continues to grow. It’s also becoming an even more vital outlet for physical music and entertainment, following the news that Sainsbury’s is to stop selling CDs and DVDs.

 HMV is releasing special anniversary vinyl editions alongside merchandise. The celebrations can also step up a gear once Covid restrictions lift later this month.

“Once restrictions lift [on July 19] we’ll be able to do much more in stores, and given the year we’ve had, we’re determined to have a full year of celebrations,” Doug Putman told Music Week.

Here, Doug Putman opens up about the anniversary and the future of HMV - the last UK music chain...

HMV has been around for 100 years – why’s it endured when every other music/entertainment chain has departed?

“There have been other music chains in the UK, but there’s something unique about HMV that means it has remained relevant. I think part of the reason is that it’s always felt like a hub for music fans, with a vast range of titles and staff who have a huge enthusiasm for music and entertainment, but not intimidatingly so for shoppers who might have a more casual interest. It’s part of the fabric of the British high street, and as an extension of that, of the UK as a whole.”

The last few years have been quite a rollercoaster – how’s it been for you in an exciting and challenging period for HMV?

“When I bought HMV it had been through a highly publicised period of turmoil, but at the core was this really exciting and iconic brand that people still loved, and staff who are such fans of music, film and TV that their passion really shone through. The team and I worked really hard to build a stable foundation for the business going forward. We couldn’t have foreseen the impact the global pandemic would have, which means that we’ve accelerated the growth of our online store. But I’m convinced that physical, in-store retail will never be replaced, and we’ve seen that from the footfall we’ve had since we reopened following the lifting of the last set of restrictions.”

PHOTO CREDIT: HMV 

What did HMV get right in recent years - and what’s changing?

“In some ways it’s good to be all things to everybody - I’m proud that regardless of whether you’re into music, film or TV, HMV feels like home to many shoppers. But what did change was that we started really testing whether something felt right for us. This year we agreed to sponsor the Coventry Empire – now the HMV Empire - because there’s a symbiotic relationship between live music and music retail: it delivers something extra and truly personal for the fans.”

Do you have a favourite memory since you acquired HMV?

“We opened Europe’s largest entertainment store in October 2019 with The Vault in Birmingham, which offers not only a huge range of music, film and merchandise, but also a stage for both big artists and grassroots local bands to perform. It felt like a moment that put HMV back on the map. Last year we also saw Stormzy visit our stores, drawing huge crowds, and it showed the power that big artists have to drive excitement around music, and that experiencing music is something that can’t just be done in front of a screen”.

It is nice to think that HMV could survive for many years to come! One always wonders how much of the high street will be left before long. I am not sure whether Putman will change stores in terms of what they stock. The DVD and C.D. component might not be as popular as it was years ago. Vinyl is becoming more sought-after and important. I go to HMV as much as I can and hope that, one day, it returns to Oxford Street. There were two stores on Oxford Street; neither is open anymore.

fff.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: HMV 

For me, HMV represents happy memories. When I was young and getting into music, I would take a bus ride into town with friends to buy an album or single – buying something as modest as a single was crucial to me! Alongside Our Price and Woolworths (which closed many years ago), HMV was a crucial portal for music discovery! The thrill of going in and seeing the album or single you wanted there on the display rack/shelve was a rush! It was not only music that I went there for. There is a lot of great merchandise and DVDs that I browsed. It is a nice place to be. Even though there are great record shops that provide the same experience, HMV offers something extra! It has that history and sense of legacy. It is testament to its place in the country that it can hold its head up after a century! It will be a very sad day if we ever have to walk around the high street and know that HMV does not exist anymore. To mark the big anniversary on 20th July, go and visit HMV or buy something from the website. The special anniversary vinyl editions look amazing. When restrictions lift next week, the store can welcome in more people and operate at near-normal. It will be a welcome stage for them after such a hard time. HMV is definitely such an important and loved part…

zzz.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: PA Wire/PA Images

OF so many people’s lives.

FEATURE: Spotlight: The Goon Sax

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

qww.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Lance Bangs 

The Goon Sax

___________

BEFORE I bring in…

wqq.jpg

a couple of reviews for the trio’s new album, Mirror II, It is worth sourcing interviews with Brisbane’s The Goon Sax. I discovered them fairly recently, but I have been listening back to their earlier work – I especially love 2016’s Up to Anything. I think that Mirror II is the most impressive album from The Goon Sax. Before coming to a more recent interview, Rolling Stone published a spotlight feature of the band. It is interesting how the trio found one another:

“Louis Forster of the excellent Australian indie-pop band the Goon Sax started writing songs when he was seven years old, right after he got his grade-school-aged mind blown by Green Day’s American Idiot. He kept at it for years, but he never really felt comfortable sharing his work with anyone else — even his uniquely musical parents. His father, Robert Forster, was co-frontman of the Go-Betweens, one of the Eighties’ most acclaimed indie-pop bands; his mother, Karin Bäumler, was in the German group Baby You Know. “Songwriting is such a personal thing,” he says. “Only in the last year or so has it been that I could ever share that with anybody else. Doing that with any member of my family just seems so awkward.”

His hesitance fell away around the time he met another fledgling songwriter, James Harrison, in high school. “When I first showed James my songs, he didn’t really say anything,” Forster recalls. “He just started playing along. He wasn’t picking it apart, and that made me feel all right about it. We just played the song twice, and said nothing, and then we had a sandwich and went to the creek and got high or something.”

The two recruited drummer Riley Jones, an intimidatingly cool girl who also wrote songs and was already in a band despite having only mastered, by her count, two drum beats. The bandmates’ fragility and shyness — a sense that intimacy is something you earn, sometimes the hard way — remains an engine to the fantastic songs the trio have written since forming the Goon Sax. “You don’t have to hold my sweaty hands/I completely understand,” Forster sang on the band’s 2016 debut, Up For Anything, an album that often recalled the spare, naive guitar-pop of Jonathan Richman, Half Japanese or Television Personalities. On another Up to Anything standout, “Boyfriend,” Forster and Jones sweetly sang, “I need a boyfriend/Or just anything real/And we can break your heart/So you see how I feel.”

The Goon Sax just released their second album, We’re Not Talking, one of this year’s most charming indie releases. On its devastatingly great single “Make Time 4 Love,” a jumpy cowbell beat and taught guitar churn unfold into a gushing melody and summery strings as Forster sings, “Let’s get nervous in your room again,” with the florid charisma and old-world charm of a cardigan-clad Bryan Ferry. “All of our lyrics are a little bit self-indulgent,” says Harrison, “and maybe that’s great.”

The band were still teenagers when they started playing shows, so young they were often hustled out of clubs right after their sets because they were under drinking age”.

I would advise anyone who has not discovered The Goon Sax to check out the Australian trio. Earlier this month, Under the Radar spent some time with the group. It is interesting hearing about the origins of the album title, Mirror II:

“The Australian trio (which also features Riley Jones, and James Harrison) released a new album, Mirror II, today via Matador, their first for the label. Mirror II is the band’s third album and the follow-up to 2018’s We’re Not Talking, which was released by Wichita. John Parish (Aldous Harding, PJ Harvey) produced the album, which was recorded in Bristol, England at Invada Studios (which is owned by Geoff Barrow of Portishead and Beak>). Since their last album, Forster moved to Berlin and worked in a cinema, while Jones and Harrison formed a post-punk side-project, Soot.

“The first two albums are inherently linked,” said Forster in a press release announcing the album. “They had three-word titles; they went together. This one definitely felt like going back to square one and starting again, and that was really freeing.”

“We lived in a shared house together, this tiny little Queenslander we called ‘Fantasy Planet,’ where we wrote the album,” Jones explained of the album’s genesis. “We were able to go to each other’s rooms and say anything that came to mind and go to the practice room three times a week. It was pretty intense.”

Of the album title, Jones added: “I was reading The Philosophy of Andy Warhol the other day. He said something so perfect… ‘I’m sure I’m going to look in the mirror and see nothing. People are always calling me a mirror, and if a mirror looks into a mirror, what is there to see?’ The name [Mirror II] was totally arbitrary to begin with, but it became about reflecting on reflection: we all get so influenced by each other. You find other people who show you yourself, who you are”.

I really love the bond between the members of The Goon Sax. They are a remarkable group who have such energy and chemistry. I feel we will be getting albums from them for a very long time. One cannot hear any sense of them tiring or lacking inspiration. Conversely, they seem to be hitting a new peak. Before coming to some reviews, Our Culture Mag ran a deep and extensive interview with the trio this month. There are some sections of the interview I was keen to include:

“Brisbane trio The Goon Sax – Louis Forster, James Harrison, and Riley Jones – were in high school when their debut album, 2016’s Up to Anything, was released, and they were still in their teens when its follow-up came out two years later. All three members take turns writing, singing, and playing each instrument, and 2018’s We’re Not Talking saw them honing in their endearingly raw brand of guitar-pop as well as their conversational style of songwriting and delivery – in conversation with each other and the listener, certainly, but also with the greater lineage of alternative and pop music that they both are influenced by and belong to. Their new album and first for Matador, Mirror II – out today – is a marvel of craft, dynamism, and emotion: aided by producer John Parish (PJ Harvey, Aldous Harding, Dry Cleaning), they’ve managed to expand on the eclecticism of its predecessor while delivering their most infectiously catchy collection of songs yet, a record as mature as it is playful and as relatable as it is surreal and larger-than-life. Despite the group’s diverse sensibilities and idiosyncratic taste, they’ve come through sounding more confident and in sync than ever.

qqq.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Hugo Nobay 

It took you three years to write and record this album, and you spent quite a bit of time apart during that period. I’m wondering if that affected your creative process in any way compared to your previous releases.

Louis Forster: Yeah, I think it did. When we’re together, we kind of share what we’re listening to and what we’re experiencing constantly, and I think that was the first time that all three of us went off entirely in our own directions and spent some time alone, just discovering new things independently of each other. And I think it was important for us all to do that alone and it gave us more of a personal identity within the record, but also changed the way that we play together and slot in together, in that we maybe have more of an idea about ourselves – not just the band as a whole, but the parts that make it up, and how we can be the strongest and push each other the furthest.

How do you choose which perspective or moment to try and capture, then? Because there is a kind of selective process, and in some ways it seems like you have chosen the songs or the moments that do take an almost transcendental quality.

James: I think a lot of the songs are quite transcendental. Even in the live show we’ve tried to make it really epic and bigger than maybe ourselves, or larger than life. And that’s kind of how I felt in some of my lyrics, just observing when I feel out of my body because of the things around me or the thoughts in me.

 You obviously went into these songs with different perspectives, but was there something that after the fact you realized was kind of a common through-line in your writing?

Louis: It’s something we talked about a lot throughout the process of making the record, was the supernatural and love as this supernatural and powerful idea. We express it in very very different ways, but I think it’s definitely there for all of us. And I think our songs are very genuine and emotional, but there’s also a silliness and a playfulness to them. We all like pop music and rock and roll when it’s silly, in the way that T Rex is silly or in the way that Kylie Minogue is silly. And it’s so genuine at the same time, it’s completely heartfelt, but I think you can almost be more genuine and more emotional when you don’t constantly take yourself too seriously and you’re hung up on some really truthful, honest essence of yourself, but you allow yourself to go into the more far-flung corners of your personality that you maybe don’t feel all the time that are at times, you know, exuberant or whatever.

Riley: I think that a big part of it is filtered through the part where we come together at the end. It’s like you’re bringing your idea to the tribunal, in a way, and then some things stick because they feel good in the context of playing it together. We all have so many ideas for songs – Louis writes hundreds of songs; James writes hundreds of parts. And I – I don’t write songs very often, actually, but I play music a lot [laughter]. But when we come together, that’s when you know what works.

To bring things together, I wanted to relate this to the album title – I hope it was Riley this time who said this, but you’ve talked about how it started as something almost arbitrary and then became about “reflecting on reflection,” and how we find ourselves through other people. In what ways would you say that you’re influenced by each other, and beyond that, also see yourselves more through each other and working with each other?

Riley: It’s very… complex. We’ve known each other for so long now, we’ve spent so much time together. It’s kind of like beyond friendship. It’s more like family, but it’s also something else. Like, I wonder sometimes how I how I exist outside of this context, because it’s such a huge part of my life. And I think that I maybe lean on James and Louis just as I go about, you know, doing my thing in the world. I kind of always know that they’re there in some way. And I think that they’re a huge part of how I present myself too, not because I always say, “Yeah, I’m in this band” to everybody I meet. Which, actually, I kind of do. [laughter] But just in terms of their demeanors; it’s something that I definitely carry with me. Like, the people that you get to understand first kind of inform your understanding of everybody else in the world.

Louis: I totally second that. Sometimes the clothes I wear are informed by the fact that I’ll be standing next to Jim and Riley and what they’re wearing. It’s a conversation where we’re responding to each other in every element of ourselves. And recently, Riley’s been in the UK for a while and we haven’t been doing so much band stuff physically, and I noticed – I don’t know, it’s different when you’re not existing in the context of each other. But at the same time, I completely agree with what Riley says, it is always there”.

www.jpg

I want to move on to the reception that has been afforded to Mirror II. It is a remarkable album that has been met with acclaim and huge interest. In their review of the album, The Guardian discuss how the writing credits and balance has changed in the group:

“With Mirror II, the label appears to have inherited a different band to the authors of We’re Not Talking. After a layoff in which their members variously moved to Berlin, took up free jazz drumming and dabbled in noise rock, the Goon Sax are now more expansive, ambitious and confident, their efforts aided by producer John Parish, best known as PJ Harvey’s primary musical foil. In the Stone and Psychic take a sound that started life as resolutely unvarnished and small scale – part of the appeal of the Goon Sax’s debut album was how listening to it felt like covertly reading someone’s teenage diary – and shift it on to a bigger stage without losing any of the idiosyncratic charm. There’s a muscular power-chord chug underpinning In the Stone, but it’s topped off with disjointed, needling lead guitar and weird spatters of ghostly electronics; Psychic’s sound is built out of an odd combination of drum machine, rumbling distorted guitar and bright, poppy synthesiser. Both songs are superbly written, their sweet melodies carrying lyrics that depict people arguing, frequently at cross purposes – “you said that we were psychic,” protests the latter, “like I’d find some comfort in that” – their drollness amplified by Forster’s doleful, conversational delivery.

Forster was initially the Goon Sax’s primary writer, and he’s still the provider of their most immediate songs – not just In the Stone and Psychic, but the spectacular chorus of The Chance, and Bathwater, which starts out rackety and nervous then suddenly picks up speed, breaking into an assured sprint. But a lot of Mirror II’s strength lies in the fact they now contain three distinct writing voices. Riley Jones deals in songs that bear the melodic influence of 60s girl groups alongside more left-field concerns. She’s apparently a fan of Throbbing Gristle and avant garde 70s Japanese psych-rock band Les Rallizes Dénudés, and you can tell: the chaotic mesh of guitar and synth on Tag keeps spiralling out of tune, at odds with her airy vocal, and the track concludes with a keyboard line that would sound poppy were it not in a completely different key to the other instruments.

James Harrison’s writing, meanwhile, is the toughest sell, equal parts Syd Barrett-ish strangeness and the shambolic 80s indie of Television Personalities or the Pastels: his voice is wayward, his chord sequences lurch at odd angles, the lyrics tend to quirky imagery and non-sequiturs (“let me educate you, you clearly don’t understand – and nor do I”). It’s a hard thing to pull off without sounding faintly annoying and contrived, a trap he falls into on Carpetry, but when it clicks – as it does on the sprawling melody of Temples, or the closing Caterpillars, which abruptly jumps from whimsy to a majestic synthesiser coda – the results are really striking.

The diversity of the writing means that Mirror II occasionally feels more like a hugely enjoyable compilation than a single artist album: whether one trio can successfully contain three writers with such diverse approaches indefinitely is an interesting question. Hopefully yes – in a world filled with artists who present themselves as a perfectly finished product, their notion of themselves already set in stone, there’s something intriguing about hearing a band so clearly in a state of flux, pulling what they do in different directions, developing before your ears. It makes growing up in public seem fascinating rather than arduous”.

zzz.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Elliott Lauren

I am interested seeing where The Goon Sax head. There is so much great music coming out of Australia at the moment. Brisbane has always been a real hub – if an underrated one – for innovative and original music. NME provided their take on Mirror II when they sat down to review it:

“A lot can happen in five years. The group’s latest album, ‘Mirror II’, sometimes feels like the work of a different band altogether. Their first record with indie giant Matador Records (though released on Chapter Music in Australia and New Zealand), it marks a sharp pivot in direction. The Goon Sax has taken cues from new wave and electronica, most evidently on ‘Desire’, a dreamy, fuzzy track overlaid with a sparkly sheen that takes the listener on a five-minute sonic journey. ‘Desire’ floats from a wall of noise to quieter, more contemplative moments, stillness used in a way that the band hasn’t attempted before: creating space for the ideas to make maximum impact.

Jones takes the front seat on ‘Tag’, her gentle vocals swimming over a delicious bed of synthesisers as the band tackles modulations with ease. ‘The Chance’ brings in keys and distortion, with Forster and Jones’ voices combining in the chorus to create an epic, expansive atmosphere. A saxophone punctuates ‘Bathwater’, adding a woozy new element before exploding back into angular guitar pop. These are assured, mature songs bursting with creativity.

That’s not to say that the trademark Goon Sax attitude has vanished: that same propulsive simplicity underpins many of the songs, layered as they are with new ideas. Driven by Harrison’s slacker drawl, ‘Carpetry’ could be lifted from either of the band’s first two albums, and ‘Caterpillars’ begins in the same way before leaking into an extended outro, voices used wordlessly as instruments.

Perhaps the most touching thing about listening to ‘Mirror II’ is noticing little connections with The Goon Sax’s early teenage songs: on 2016’s ‘Telephone’ they sang, “I hate those telephones / they hurt me everyday,” and on 2021’s ‘In the Stone’ they sing, “Didn’t have to sound so disappointed when I called / if you had ever saved my number in your phone”. So much can change in five years, especially in the transition from adolescence to adulthood, but some things will always be the same”.

I shall wrap up. Go and explore the work of The Goon Sax. It is hard to compare them to anyone else. They very much have their own niche and groove. Mirror II is one of the best albums of the year, and it signals a trio with fresh intent and inspiration. It seems like a lot of people are discovering The Goon Sax fresh or have been with them a while but can see them evolved and strengthened. I hope that they can tour worldwide soon enough and bring their music to the U.K. I have not seen them live, though I can imagine their work sounds amazing on the stage. Seeing The Goon Sax take to the stage would be…

EXCITING to see.

______________

Follow The Goon Sax

xxx.jpg

FEATURE: Too Good to Be Forgotten: Songs That Are Much More Than a Guilty Pleasure: Atomic Kitten - Whole Again

FEATURE:

 

 

Too Good to Be Forgotten: Songs That Are Much More Than a Guilty Pleasure

 Atomic Kitten - Whole Again

___________

THIS is a rather strange…

aaa.jpg

instalment of this feature, as I am recommending a song that has sort of been remade by the band. Atomic Kitten were a big girl group of the 1990s. The current line-up, Liz McClarnon, Jenny Frost, Natasha Hamilton, have sort of remade Whole Again for the England football team. The Line of Best Fit explain the remix:

“Atomic Kitten have re-recorded and released their updated version of "Whole Again" featuring lyrics about England football manager Gareth Southgate ahead of tomorrow's Euro semi-final game against Denmark.

Last weekend Atomic Kitten took to the stage at Boxpark Croydon following England's Euro 2020 win against Ukraine to perform the Gareth Southgate remix of "Whole Again", which was first adapted by fans during the 2018 World Cup.

Today (6 July), ahead of tomorrow's semi-final game against Denmark, Atomic Kitten have given the reworked version of the song an official release.

Atomic Kitten's new version is titled "Southgate You're the One (Football's Coming Home Again)", and features the iconic chorus paying tribute to the England manager, "Looking back on when we first met / I cannot escape and I cannot forget / Southgate you’re the one / You still turn me on / Football’s coming home again”.

Few people were expecting the group to come back together for a cause like England’s progress in Euro 2020. This is being written before the final so, when it goes online, we will know whether England won against Italy.

Whole Again is taken from the group’s debut, Right Now, of 2000 The album was re-released in 2001 following the departure of Kerry Katona. Whilst not one of the strongest girl groups, the Liverpool-formed trio were pretty strong. Many people have judged Whole Again to be a guilty pleasure. Before going on, here is some background regarding the track:

“Whole Again" is the fifth single released from British pop girl group Atomic Kitten's debut album, Right Now (2000). It is the group's biggest selling single to date and was the final single to feature founding member Kerry Katona, who left the group midway through promoting the single. "Whole Again" was the first single released from the album in Europe and South Africa. It was a massive success, reaching number one in several countries and selling over a million copies in the UK alone.

"Whole Again" was co-written by Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark (OMD) members and Atomic Kitten founders Andy McCluskey and Stuart Kershaw, along with Jem Godfrey and Bill Padley. The four writers were nominated for the Ivor Novello Award for excellence in songwriting, and Billboard ranked the track number 96 on their list of the "100 Greatest Girl Group Songs of All Time". Multiple artists, including OMD, have covered the song.

Following the departure of Katona, she was replaced a few days later by Jenny Frost of fellow English girl group Precious, just after the single topped the UK Singles Chart. As a result, the music video was reshot and Frost's vocals appeared on the reissue of Right Now”.

A lot of songs from girl groups of the 1990s and early-2000s are dismissed or seen as inferior. Whilst the U.S. girl groups were stronger than ours, I have a lot of time for Atomic Kitten. Whole Again is catchy, soulful and romantic! The fact they have reworked it for England is pretty good! If you have never heard the song before, then give it a spin. The Right Now album is satisfying and has plenty of good songs on there. I don’t think that Whole Again is a guilty pleasure – not that I think this is a term that can be applied to any song. Whole Again is a lot stronger than many have given it credit for. Going back to Wikipedia. They discuss and explore the impact and success of the song:

“The single debuted at number one in the United Kingdom with first-week sales of 69,286 copies, staying atop the chart for four weeks and increasing in sales during every week that it was at number one. It has since gone on to sell over 1,000,000 copies in the UK alone. It is the fourth best-selling single by a girl group of all time, after "Wannabe" and "2 Become 1" by the Spice Girls and "Never Ever" by All Saints. It also became the 13th overall best-selling single of the 2000s decade. As of November 2016, it remains the biggest-selling song of the 21st century in the UK by a girl band”.

If you have been against Atomic Kitten and avoided Whole Again, then spend some time with it now. It is a really solid song that should get a lot more love. I first heard it when it came out and I like to give it a play every now and then. To me, it is most definitely not…

A guilty pleasure.

FEATURE: When You Wish Upon a Star: Kate Bush’s Lionheart: Would a Reorganised Tracklisting Make It a Stronger Album?  

FEATURE:

 

 

When You Wish Upon a Star

rr.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in an outtake from the Lionheart album cover shoot/PHOTO CREDIT: Gered Mankowitz 

Kate Bush’s Lionheart: Would a Reorganised Tracklisting Make It a Stronger Album?  

___________

THIS is not the first time…

qq.jpg

that I have dove deep into Lionheart. Kate Bush’s second studio album, it is one that often comes in for some stick. When I wrote about it last year, I defended it (as if it needed that at all!). Many people, when ranking her ten studio albums, often place Lionheart last - either that or 1993’s The Red Shoes. Whereas The Red Shoes has a few weak tracks and the production sound is a bit compressed and lacking in warmth, Lionheart is very similar to The Kick Inside. Her 1978 debut (Lionheart was released in the same year) was produced by Andrew Powell. He produced Lionheart with assistance from Bush. Some people have argued that Lionheart lacks songs as memorable and important as Wuthering Heights and The Man with the Child in His Eyes – unarguably the two best-known songs on her debut. Wow and Symphony in Blue are stunning. The former track is one of Bush’s older ones, whereas Symphony in Blue was written for Lionheart (she only wrote three new songs for her second album). It is amazing how, given the short amount of time she had to compile a second album, there are so many wonderful tracks! Even if Lionheart is slightly weaker than The Kick Inside, why then is it placed much lower than its predecessor!? Some can argue that, for a second album, it is not a huge leap from the debut. I would disagree to an extent.

Nine months after her debut came out, one could not expect something like The Dreaming or Hounds of Love. Lionheart is broader in terms of its themes. Songs of love and longing seem more varied and diverse. Listen to a track such as Coffee Homeground. It is very different to anything on The Kick Inside. Despite the odd weaker track, there are some stunning tracks on Lionheart. It is baffling that the album has received such unremarkable reviews. In a review that does offer some positives, this is what Drowned in Sound said:

“One of the funny things about The Before Time when you had to buy music to listen to it is that ropey critical reputations could really put you off ever listing to certain records, even by artists you loved. It took me years to get around to Lionheart. And you know, sure, it’s the weakest Kate Bush record but that doesn’t make it bad. If anything the fact it’s routinely dismissed as a rushed follow up to The Kick Inside means it doesn’t have the pressure to compete with the stronger later records. The luminous ‘Wow’ is obviously the best and most memorable song, but seriously, check out those elaborately layered vocals on opener ‘Symphony in Blue’. The songwriting is a bit hazy compared to the laser-definition of later albums, but musically and texturally it’s a really beautiful record - the only Kate Bush album that is content to be pretty and not ask you to commit to it, and there’s something to be said for that, I think. (7)”.

Most reviews are quite dismissive. Many compare Lionheart negatively with The Kick Inside in terms of consistency and songwriting brilliance. Take apart Lionheart, and I feel one could find a lot to love. How many people – who have placed the album so low – have heard it in full lately!? To me, the quality of the songs, production and Bush’s vocals are not that inferior compared to her debut album. So, then, what is it that means the album is seen as the less spectacular of Bush’s cannon? One explanation might be the tracklisting and sequencing. Beforehand, I have argued how her albums are brilliantly arranged so that the tracks are where they need to be. That is true of albums like The Kick Inside, The Dreaming and Hounds of Love. Maybe one could slightly tweak Never for Ever and The Sensual World and make them even stronger. Revisiting Lionheart as I have been, a couple of things struck me. I have been impacted by songs that I overlooked before. In Search of Peter Pan is a gorgeous song where, at the very end, Bush sings lines from When You Wish Upon a Star (a very rare case of her using other people’s words in her song. Leigh Harline and Ned Washington wrote it for Disney's 1940 adaptation of Pinocchio). Oh England My Lionheart has taken on new life and meaning. There is so much to unpack and enjoy through Lionheart. Not that it will be done….though I feel a reordering of the songs would make for a better album.

The quality is there for sure! Perhaps this is a case of the right tracks being in the wrong order. Not that an iPod-like reshuffle would make the album more brilliant and popular than Hounds of Love or Aerial. I don’t think Lionheart would be bottom or in the bottom-two if there was a rearrangement – The Red Shoes and 2011’s Director’s Cut would probably occupy those bottom slots. As it is, Lionheart’s tracklisting is as follows:

Symphony in Blue

In Search of Peter Pan

Wow

Don't Push Your Foot on the Heartbrake

Oh England My Lionheart

Full House

In the Warm Room

Kashka from Baghdad

Coffee Homeground

Hammer Horror

It is a subjective preference in terms of what a ‘new tracklisting’ would look like. In terms of quality, you have two of the strongest tracks – Symphony in Blue and Wow – in the first half. Two other big ones – Kashka from Baghdad and Hammer Horror – are in the second half. If anything, Lionheart is a little top-heavy. I always find it strange that the album’s first single, Hammer Horror, ends the album. It possesses a sweeping sound that suggests producer Andrew Powell might have envisaged this climatic ending. Perhaps Bush herself was instrumental in the track order; or was Jon Kelly (recording engineer, mixing) influential? Whomever gave the final okay for the order of the songs, a reassembling could lead to an album that retains its balance (in terms of the compositions and vocal) but leads to an even more satisfying listening experience.

Many Kate Bush fans ignore Lionheart. For those (like me) who love the album, they would have thought about how, if they had the chance, they would organise the songs. One of my wishes is that, one day, we can have access to the masters and be able to pick apart and rearrange songs – so that vocals can be isolated and we can have different mixes. Lionheart is a fabulous album where the weaker tracks are not in the right place. Not that there are drastic changes, but here is my view of what the tracklisting for Lionheart should look like:

Symphony in Blue

Wow

Oh England My Lionheart

In Search of Peter Pan

Don't Push Your Foot on the Heartbrake

In the Warm Room

Full House

Coffee Homeground

Hammer Horror

Kashka from Baghdad

Actually…there is a fairly drastic reshuffle! The song that definitely has always been in the correct place is Symphony in Blue. Like Moving on The Kick Inside, it is the perfect opener. In fact, when it comes to her albums, the opening track has always felt right and like it could not be anywhere else – maybe 50 Words for Snow’s Snowflake is an exception. This is, as I said, my personal opinion. Others might be of the view that the tracks are fine where they are on Lionheart. I feel that the quality of the material is exceptional. Maybe some who have reviewed the album harshly have had moments where their attention dipped, or they felt there was a lack of surprise.

My ordering provides means two big tracks are at the top. In Search of Peter Pan is another solid song. The first half would end with one of the slightly weaker songs, Don’t Push Your Foot on the Heartbreak. Even so, we go out with a Rock number that ensures a big finish to that half. I don’t think the first five songs are too samey or there are drastic turns in terms of tone and sound. Perhaps Oh England My Lionheart and In Search of Peter Pan are two similar songs right next to each other. I feel they compliment one another and sound great side by side. After the impassioned end to side one, we open the same way on side two as we did on the first. In the Warm Room, again a track that some dismiss, is in the middle of the pack. It mirrors, in a way, the feel of Symphony in Blue. Whilst the first four songs provided strength and consistency, the final four do too. Full House and Coffee Homeground – two of the more experimental and darker songs – are beside one another and come fairly close to the end. We build to these. Rather than doing a full-180 after Coffee Homeground, Hammer Horror provides a not-too-severe segue. People might argue that I have not exactly moved Hammer Horror too far up the list! That is true…

I do think that it needs to be in the second half. Some may disagree. It seemed strange having it as the final track. I always feel that, when you listen to Hammer Horror last, you are waiting for a finale or something else. With one of the strongest tracks, Kashka from Baghdad – why was this not a single?! -, ending things, we get a beautiful song that takes us to rest. Again, there are similarities to Symphony in Blue. It is pointless trying to re-sequence an album that has been out for over forty years! I get tired of the bashing Lionheart receives. The feeling that the material is weaker and it is a very pale follow-up to The Kick Inside. That is not the case. Also, there is plenty of evolution and growth in an amazingly short space of time! I wonder whether there were a couple of extra tracks that Bush considered for Lionheart but did not include. At ten tracks, it is a tight and fairly short listen of about thirty-seven minutes. Not that two extra tracks would have made the album that much better. It is interesting to imagine and dream what could have been back in 1978. I do hope that more people give Lionheart a try and spend more time with it. I truly believe that it is a record that is overdue fresh love. Maybe, with the ten tracks organised as I have suggested above, people might see Lionheart…

wqww.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in the ‘redhead’ shoot (1978)/PHOTO CREDIT: Gered Mankowitz

IN a new light.

FEATURE: A Buyer’s Guide: Part Sixty-Three: The Roots

FEATURE:

 

 

A Buyer’s Guide

IN THIS PHOTO: The Roots backstage in Chicago in October 2000/PHOTO CREDIT: Paul Natkin/WireImage 

Part Sixty-Three: The Roots

___________

BEFORE coming to the albums…

zzz.jpg

from The Roots that you need to own, it is worth bringing in some biography. The legendary and hugely influential act are one of the greatest ever. I am not recommending a book this week. Instead, the four essential albums, the underrated one and their latest studio album. Prior to getting there, here is some more background regarding The Roots:

“One of the most prolific rap groups, the Roots were also among the most progressive acts in contemporary music, from their 1993 debut through their conceptual 2010s releases. Despite the seemingly archaic practice of functioning as a rap band with several instrumentalists -- from 2007 onward, their lineup even featured a sousaphonist -- they were ceaselessly creative, whether with their own material or through their varied assortment of collaborations. They went platinum and gold with successive studio releases and won a handful of Grammy Awards. After they gained a nightly nationwide audience through a close partnership with television host Jimmy Fallon, they continued to challenge listeners with works free of genre restrictions.

The Roots' focus on live music began back in 1987, when rapper Black Thought (Tariq Trotter) and drummer ?uestlove (Ahmir Khalib Thompson) became friends at the Philadelphia High School for Creative Performing Arts. Playing around school, on the sidewalk, and later at talent shows (with ?uestlove's drum kit backing Black Thought's rhymes), the pair began to earn money and hooked up with bassist Hub (Leon Hubbard) and rapper Malik B. Moving from the street to local clubs, the Roots became a highly tipped underground act around Philadelphia and New York. When they were invited to represent stateside hip-hop at a concert in Germany, the Roots recorded an album to sell at shows; the result, Organix, was released in May 1993 on Remedy Records. With a music industry buzz surrounding their activities, the Roots entertained offers from several labels before signing with DGC that same year.

The Roots' first major-label album, Do You Want More?!!!??!, was released in January 1995. Forsaking usual hip-hop protocol, the record was produced without any samples or previously recorded material. It peaked just outside the Top 100 of the Billboard 200 and made more tracks in alternative circles, partly due to the Roots playing the second stage at Lollapalooza that summer. The band also journeyed to the Montreux Jazz Festival in Switzerland. Two of the guests on the album who had toured around with the band, human beatbox Rahzel the Godfather of Noyze -- previously a performer with Grandmaster Flash and LL Cool J -- and Scott Storch (later replaced by Kamal Gray), became permanent members of the group.

Early in 1996, the Roots released "Clones," the trailer single for their second album. It hit the rap Top Five, and created a good buzz. That September, Illadelph Halflife appeared and made number 21 on the Billboard 200. Much like its predecessor, though, the Roots' second LP was a difficult listen. It made several very small concessions to mainstream rap -- the bandmembers sampled material that they had recorded earlier at jam sessions -- but failed to make a hit of their unique sound. Their third album, February 1999's Things Fall Apart, was easily their biggest critical and commercial success. Released on MCA, it went platinum, and "You Got Me" -- a collaboration with Erykah Badu -- peaked within the Top 40 and subsequently won a Grammy in the category of Best Rap Performance by a Duo or Group.

The long-awaited Phrenology was released in November 2002 amid rumors of the Roots losing interest in their label arrangements with MCA. In 2004, the band remedied the situation by creating the Okayplayer company. Named after their website, Okayplayer included a record label and a production/promotion company. The same year, the band held a series of jam sessions to give their next album a looser feel. The results were edited down to ten tracks and released in July 2004 as The Tipping Point, supported by Geffen. A 2004 concert from Manhattan's Webster Hall with special guests like Mobb Deep, Young Gunz, and Jean Grae was issued in February 2005 as The Roots Present in both CD and DVD formats. Two volumes of the rarities-collecting Home Grown! The Beginner's Guide to Understanding the Roots appeared at the end of the year.

A subsequent deal with Def Jam fostered a series of riveting, often grim sets, beginning with Game Theory (August 2006) and Rising Down (April 2008). In 2009, the group expanded their reach as the exceptionally versatile house band on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. The new gig didn't slow their recording schedule; in 2010 alone, they released the sharp How I Got Over (June), as well as Wake Up! (September), where they backed John Legend on covers of socially relevant soul classics like Harold Melvin & the Blue Notes' "Wake Up Everybody" and Donny Hathaway's "Little Ghetto Boy." It earned Grammy Awards for Best R&B Album and Best Traditional R&B Vocal Performance. As they remained with Fallon, the Roots worked with Miami soul legend Betty Wright on November 2011's Betty Wright: The Movie, and followed it the next month with their 13th studio long-player, Undun, an ambitious concept album whose main character dies in the first track and then follows his life backward.

Work on the group's next studio LP was postponed as an unexpected duet album with Elvis Costello took priority for the group in 2013. Originally planned as a reinterpretation of Costello's songbook, the record Wise Up Ghost turned into a full-fledged collaboration and was greeted by positive reviews upon its September 2013 release on Blue Note. Within six months, the band joined Jimmy Fallon in his new late-night slot, the high-profile Tonight Show program. Another concept album, the brief but deep ...And Then You Shoot Your Cousin, was released in May 2014. Rapper Malik B., a fixture on the Roots' early albums, died on July 29, 2020, at the age of 47”.

If you require a guide about The Roots and are not sure which are the albums you need in your collection, I hope that the suggestions below are of some help. As you will hear from their music, it has the power to move you…

IN so many ways.

____________

The Four Essential Albums

 

Do You Want More?!!!??!

aa.jpg

Release Date: 17th January, 1995

Labels: DGC/Geffen

Producers: The Grand Negaz/Questlove/Kelo/A.J. Shine/Black Thought/Rahzel

Standout Tracks: Proceed/Do You Want More?!!!??!/Silent Treatment (ft. Cassandra Wilson)

Buy: https://www.roughtrade.com/gb/the-roots/do-you-want-more-63de765c-f30f-4d7a-b2c3-92514477b1ae

Stream: https://open.spotify.com/album/3N0wHnD5Rd8jnTUvNqOXGz?si=kc0UtertSRi8u7sesDGDDg&dl_branch=1

Review:

“Because the Roots were pioneering a new style during the early '90s, the band was forced to draw its own blueprints for its major-label debut album. It's not surprising then, that Do You Want More?!!!??! sounds more like a document of old-school hip-hop than contemporary rap. The album is based on loose grooves and laid-back improvisation, and where most hip-hoppers use samples to draw songs together and provide a chorus, the Roots just keep on jamming. The problem is that the Roots' jams begin to take the place of true songs, leaving most tracks with only that groove to speak for them. The notable exceptions -- "Mellow My Man" and "Datskat," among others -- use different strategies to command attention: the sounds of a human beatbox , the great keyboard work of Scott Storch, and contributions from several jazz players (trombonist Joshua Roseman, saxophonist Steve Coleman and vocalist Cassandra Wilson). By the close of the album, those tracks are what the listener remembers, not the lightweight grooves” – AllMusic

Choice Cut: Distortion to Static

Things Fall Apart

zzz.jpg

Release Date: 23rd February, 1999

Label: MCA

Producers: The Grand Wizzards/Scott Storch/Jay Dee

Standout Tracks: Step into the Realm/Double Trouble (ft. Mos Def)/You Got Me (ft. Erykah Badu, Tariq Trotter and Eve)

Buy: https://www.roughtrade.com/gb/the-roots/things-fall-apart

Stream: https://open.spotify.com/album/0qbl8aNaCUOvX8HGsZYLfh?si=PWOisNNzT6asozdEpcfNiw&dl_branch=1

Review:

“Despite being a breakthrough for their band and their scene, the Roots didn’t immediately build on Things Fall Apart’s success. Powered by D’Angelo’s sultry “Untitled (How Does It Feel)” video, Voodoo became a phenomenon, and ?uest spent most of 2000 on tour as the singer’s drummer. By the time the Roots re-grouped, ?uest’s closest peers were pushing their sounds to new places. D wanted to learn guitar; Common and Dilla wanted to experiment with electronic textures. The Roots responded by moving away from the movement they helped create; their follow-up record, Phrenology, was essentially the anti-Roots album, with a heavy emphasis on rock. And while it alienated the Roots’ core fanbase, Phrenology performed well, pushing the group further into crossover territory. The Roots became a more regular presence on TV and radio. Soon after, Rahzel and Malik B. left the group for good. In 2006, Dilla died at age 32 from complications of lupus, and the Roots’ album of that year, Game Theory, kicked off a series of releases with a darker tone, including 2008’s Rising Down, 2010’s How I Got Over, and 2011’s undun. Having secured a gig as Jimmy Fallon’s backing band—first on “Late Night,” then on “The Tonight Show”—the Roots finally and completely entered the mainstream. But they used the freedom to experiment and make the music they wanted.

Things go in cycles, and the approach the Roots pioneered came back around. In 2015, the “next movement” the Roots mentioned on Things Fall Apart seemed to arrive. Kendrick Lamar’s To Pimp a Butterfly—a densely lyrical and allegorical exploration of Blackness and struggle, set to a live-jazz soundtrack featuring dozens of collaborators—is hard to imagine without this album in its rearview. Artists like Robert Glasper, Thundercat, Terrace Martin, and Kamasi Washington channel the same creativity as the Roots, D’Angelo, and company, banding together to push rap, jazz, soul, and more into atmospheric new places. The spirit of Things Fall Apart is in the air.

Looking back on it now, this record feels like both a love letter and a fond farewell to the Roots’ early days, acknowledging that they needed to evolve to stay relevant. And some of the album’s continued relevance is painful. Its closing poem, “The Return to Innocence Lost,” details the fate of a young man seemingly doomed to fail since birth. He dies tragically, leaving nothing but thoughts of a life that could’ve been. Nowadays, black men are dying at the hands of police with alarming frequency, and we’re left to mourn the dead in hashtags and shared articles, wondering what’s next—or who’s next—in this seemingly endless war. Things Fall Apart imparts a similar tone, even if the band didn’t address those issues directly. The black and white cover art, taken in Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn in 1965, depicts a young black woman running from a waiting police officer, her face twisted in fear. The scene is sadly familiar 50 years later. As the Roots teetered between fame and purgatory, virtue and failure, Things Fall Apart captured the intensity of a group with everything to lose and the world to gain” – Pitchfork

Choice Cut: The Next Movement (ft. DJ Jazzy Jeff and Jazzyfatnastees)

Phrenology

aaa.jpg

Release Date: 26th November, 2002

Label: MCA

Producers: DJ Scratch/The Grand Wizzards/Kamal Gray/Tahir Jamal/Omar the Scholar/Questlove/Karreem Riggins/Scott Storch/Zoukhan Bey

Standout Tracks: Rock You/Break You Off (ft. Musiq Soulchild)/Quills

Buy: https://www.discogs.com/sell/release/14776901

Stream: https://open.spotify.com/album/01FOonRYntwISzaCSa7S7p?si=eBy-Fz9gSQyNLA_7wPgoow&dl_branch=1

Review:

“The pseudoscience of phrenology claims that your essential personality can be “read” by feeling the bumps on your head, as if they were a kind of fingerprint of the brain. Everything is predetermined at birth, phrenologists say. But on Phrenology, their fifth and best CD, the Roots prove that wherever we start, we can still boldly change our course. This bohemian Philadelphia hip-hop crew, renowned for their great, tradition-soaked live funk performances, have received almost as much credit for what they’re not: gangstas, clichés or sample biters. Here, they clearly spell out their identity and mission — in songs that are both very personal (“Complexity,” about a couple on the edge of romantic commitment) and as specific as the morning news (“Pussy Galore” skewers people who use sex to sell products). From the thudding opening war chant, “Rock You,” the Roots make great use of new guitarist Ben Kenney. (They were turned on to rock, drummer Amir “?uestlove” Thompson recently quipped, “while we spent countless hours in front of MTV waiting for the one black video to come on.”) And they do a great job of casting, too, calling in cameos from take-no-mess R&B naturalist Jill Scott, underground Brooklyn rapper Talib Kweli, freakadelic black rocker Cody Chesnutt and even Amiri Baraka, the one living poet who actually scares people. The first single, “Break You Off,” featuring Philly neosoul singer Musiq, is a glowering tale of emotional push-and-pull that’s half hip-hop and half Marvin Gaye — and that’s before it flows into an arcing, orchestrated second section. The Roots are confident enough to follow soul music like that with the freaky soundscape “Water,” which plinks and plunks around in the urban darkness like Tom Waits let loose in the ghetto. The Roots used to be the great what-ifs of hip-hop — symbols of the thoughtful road not taken by the commercial rap masses. Suddenly, they can fulfill nearly all of their sweeping ambition to resuscitate soul’s past. Phrenology is a celebration of self-determination, a nonstop joyride through some very complicated brains” – Blender

Choice Cut: The Seed (2.0) (ft. Cody ChesnuTT)

Undun

Release Date: 2nd December, 2011

Label: Def Jam

Producer: Ray Angry/Rick Friedrich/D.D. Jackson/Khari Mateen/Richard Nichols (exec.)/James Poyser/Brent ‘Ritz’ Reynolds/Sean C & LV/Sufjan Stevens/Ahmir ‘Questlove’ Thompson

Standout Tracks: One Time (ft. Phonte & Dice Raw)/The OtherSide (ft. Bilal & Greg Porn)/I Remember

Buy: https://www.roughtrade.com/gb/the-roots/undun

Stream: https://open.spotify.com/album/0cwlEeMEkvdoiPNJxlzHtI?si=iLlYO0rqS6eXhdh7GCFnWg&dl_branch=1

Review:

“The Roots' umpteenth album is titled after a Guess Who song mutilated by countless lounge bands since 1969. It incorporates a Sufjan Stevens recording, mixtape-style, for the purpose of starting a four-part instrumental suite that closes a program lasting only 40 minutes. Based on those details, it would not be irrational to think that the band’s well of inspiration might be dry or tainted. While the well might be slightly tainted, it is full. Undun is based on the life of Redford Stephens, a fictional product of inner-city New York who was born in the mid-‘70s and tragically passed in 1999, the point at which the album begins -- with a quiet EKG flatline. Appearances from MCs Big K.R.I.T., Dice Raw, Phonte, Greg Porn, and Truck North, as well as contributions by singers Aaron Earl Livingston and Bilal, flank principal voice Black Thought, yet this is no hip-hop opera or anything close to a typical concept album. The existential rhymes, seemingly created with a shared vision, avoid outlining specific events and focus on ruminations that are grave and penetrating, as if each vocalist saw elements of himself and those he has known in Redford. What’s more, Undun probably shatters the record for fewest proper nouns on a rap album, with the likes of Hammurabi, Santa Muerte, and Walter Cronkite mentioned rather than the names of those who are physically involved in Stephens’ life. (The album’s app, filled with video clips and interviews with Stephens’ aunt, teachers, and peers, provides much more typical biographical information.) Musically, Undun flows easier and slower than any other Roots album. The backdrops ramp up with slight gradations, from soft collisions of percussion and keys (“Sleep”), to balmy gospel-soul (“Make My”), to Sunday boom-bap (“One Time”). There's a slight drop into sinewy funk (“Kool On”) that leads into a sustained stretch of stern, hunched-shoulder productions, highlighted by the crisply roiling “Lighthouse,” that match the cold realism of the lyrics. The strings in the slightly wistful “I Remember” and completely grim “Tip the Scale” are a setup for the Redford suite, which is nothing like padding. It glides through the movements, involving mournful strings, a violent duel between drummer ?uestlove and guest pianist D.D. Jackson, and a lone death note that fades 37 seconds prior to silence” – AllMusic

Choice Cut: Make My (ft. Big K.R.I.T. & Dice Raw)

The Underrated Gem

 

The Tipping Point

sss.jpg

Release Date: 13th July, 2004

Label: Geffen

Producers: Questlove/Scott Storch

Standout Tracks: I Don't Care (ft. Dom)/Don't Say Nuthin'/Duck Down! (ft. Dom)

Buy: https://www.discogs.com/sell/list?master_id=39958&ev=mb

Stream: https://open.spotify.com/album/2fw2PxmN6epMmz6qZXXNLn?si=dKdZiFzMSAqjlL2aZWPo-Q&dl_branch=1

Review:

“If 2002’s ”Phrenology” was the Philly crew’s left-field rock-rap opus, their sixth studio effort is an eclectic and often breezy reimagining of hip-hop’s energetic essence. ”Boom” is a lightning-paced evocation of late-’80s Rakim, while standout bonus track ”In Love With (the Mic),” boasting assists from incorrigible scene-stealers Dave Chappelle and ODB, recalls the loose, amped-up collaborations of the Native Tongues movement (e.g., the Jungle Brothers and Black Sheep). One of hip-hop’s premier album artists, the Roots could still stand to strengthen their singles prospects: Their most club-friendly track ever, the Scott Storch-produced ”Duck Down,” has everything going for it — except a chorus to sing along to” – Entertainment Weekly

Choice Cut: BOOM! (ft. Dice Raw)

The Latest Album

 

...and then you shoot your cousin

ddd.jpg

Release Date: 19th May, 2014

Label: Def Jam

Producers: Black Thought/D.D. Jackson/Damion Ward/Joseph Simmons/Karl Jenkins/Mike Jerz/ Richard Nichols/Ray Angry/Trapzillas/Questlove/The Wurxs

Standout Tracks: Never (featuring Patty Crash)/Black Rock (ft. Dice Raw)/The Unraveling (ft. Raheem DeVaughn)

Buy: https://www.discogs.com/sell/list?master_id=690403&ev=mb

Stream: https://open.spotify.com/album/6kYqws8vRcaUKTjFnJRb4X?si=jY9Ti734SJmKT6I7jGobjQ&dl_branch=1

Review:

“So while the accusations that hip-hop’s social justice wing has totally collapsed are more than a bit overblown, particularly myopic in regard to how that sense of justice has changed and infused into different strains within the mainstream, …And Then You Shoot Your Cousin does offer something rare in today’s climate: It’s an album whose sole focus is reportage, with no individual aspirational narrative to disguise the ugliness. It’s a purposefully fragmented work, in which main vocalist Black Thought provides the clearest through line, popping in and out of songs dotted with a roster of repeating guest stars, mostly group affiliates like Dice Raw and Greg Porn.

They take on a variety of voices, offering quick snapshots from various sectors of ghetto experience: “Black Rock” imagines street vagrants munching on early morning cheeseburgers, their jittery desperation echoed by galumphing piano and a hard-edged drumbeat; “The Dark (Trinity)” features frustrated corner boys getting soaked in the rain, their arrogance wilting as the spare, steady music grows increasingly mournful. All this gets echoed by the group’s live-band aesthetic, which pieces together revised versions of traditional soul instrumentation with spooky atonal strings and jagged samples, jumping from Nina Simone to Mary Lou Williams to Michel Chion, the patchwork structure conveying the feeling of a culture broken into pieces, exploiting those rifts to explore the full extent of hip-hop’s literary capabilities.

There’s also the welcome fact that …And Then You Shoot Your Cousin is a trim 35 minutes in length, with 11 tracks and eight proper songs, zooming through its disjointed structure without much padding. This slimness functions as a counterweight to the often stifling subject matter, as the group employs its soul-influenced backdrops in a way that feels totally opposed to what most modern hip-hop is doing. The Roots have a different sense of the music, and a further commitment to developing its ideas, rather than just miming them. In keeping with the album’s inverted sense of order, there’s no nostalgia here, and instead that warm soul sound is repeatedly pushed into twisted horror-movie palettes, with repeated references to hell and waking nightmares, the music tilting into mechanistic repetition on tracks like “The Unraveling,” with its churning, gloomy atmospherics.

A depiction of disorder and chaos, …And Then You Shoot Your Cousin places almost no focus on the hard-working everymen of the traditional soul milieu, zoning in on the desolate and the down and out, nightmare scenarios in which dreams of riches molder inside condemned buildings. While this approach sacrifices some potential subtlety in exchange for a broader, stereotype-tweaking social crusading, one perhaps a bit too enamored of its crusader status, it’s hard to deny the effect, the album’s approach integrating neatly into an overall sense of claustrophobic dread” – SLANT

Choice Cut: When the People Cheer (ft. Modesty Lycan and Greg Porn)

FEATURE: The Influence, Impact and Legacy: Forty Years of MTV

FEATURE:

 

 

The Influence, Impact and Legacy

wwww.jpg

Forty Years of MTV

___________

NOT to cover…

xss.jpg

what I have already done in the past, but MTV turns forty on 1st August. I am not sure how many people are going to cover the anniversary. MTV is one of these stations and phenomenon that has divided people. Perhaps the U.K.’s Top of the Pops has more of a legacy in terms of the mix of live performances and videos. In terms of the impact of that long-running show, maybe it resonates more than MTV. There has been a lot of criticism of MTV through the ages. I will bring in a few articles regarding MTV and its legacy. There was a definite period where the station ruled and it was hugely important. I would say that the mid-1980s and early-1990s was a golden age for MTV. That might sound like a long time though, in that period, it made a huge impression. Many established directors of today started by making music videos to feature on MTV. Pop artists like Madonna and Michael Jackson created these incredible videos and saw their careers take off - in no small part because of the station. For me, I tuned in because you got to see these great videos. MTV was not just about entertainment. I discovered a lot of different artists through the channel. Top of the Pops was important, as was radio and my friends. MTV provided this sense of wonder and cool that I didn’t get anywhere else.

Some might say that the station was quite vacant and vacuous. It is sad that music videos are not as revered and celebrated now as they were in the 1980s and 1990s. Between 1995 and 2000, MTV played thirty-five percent less music videos on the station. I do miss the days when you got these iconic and memorable videos. Today, music videos do not have the same sense of scope, ambition and importance. For that reason, I think that the fortieth anniversary of MTV should be celebrated. It is interesting learning more about the history and growth of MTV. This fascinating article from 2017 documents the birth, rise and decline of MTV. I have selected a few points:

“1. Roots in financial services

American Express wanted to sell financial services to people via their televisions so they bought cable television company Warner Cable Corporation for $175 million in 1979. The plan was to use an interactive program they’d developed to reach every home in the network and sell credit cards.

Once the companies merged, they split it between a division responsible for building the cable infrastructure and an area responsible for programming. They had two main channels in the beginning: The Movie Channel and Nickelodeon. An executive decided they needed a third channel with a focus on music.

2. MTV had to be ready in 7 months

The Warner Amex board said ‘no’ to the original pitch to launch a 24-hour music channel, positioned as “radio with pictures”. After a little executive wrangling, MTV was approved on the proviso that it would be cheap to run because the record companies would provide music videos for free. MTV was approved for launch in January 1981 and its founders only had 7 months to build it because Warner Amex wanted it on-air in summer, which is when most fads began. They wanted teenagers and college students returning from their summer break to be talking about MTV.

3. The first video played was The Buggles’ Video Killed the Radio Star

At midnight on 1 August 1981, MTV launched with Video Killed the Radio Star - a song that would go on to be prophetic for how the channel would change the music industry. Funnily enough, the second music video played was Pat Benatar’s You Better Run, programmed as a warning shot to the record companies who were still sceptical about MTV.

4. They began with only 250 videos

Music videos were in short supply at the beginning of the 80s, so MTV played whatever they could get their hands on. Many record companies in America didn’t believe in MTV and weren’t willing to provide music videos at their own cost. A bulk of the music videos MTV played came from Europe where record companies made short promotional films for their artists to be played on video jukeboxes - a popular new piece of technology at the time. With only 250 music videos being played over a 24-hour period, the early artists of MTV got a lot of exposure thanks to a combination of repetition and desperation.

5. The Second British Invasion

MTV helped British new wave bands become popular in America because they were the artists getting played in heavy rotation. In the early days of MTV it was only available in smaller American towns because the channel hadn’t been picked up in the big cities yet. Teenagers living in these towns would watch MTV and rush to their local record store to buy the albums of the bands they saw. Still, a few American record companies still didn’t get it. The Human League’s Don’t You Want Me Baby became a hit in the states thanks to MTV. Other acts to benefit include: Flock of Seagulls, Billy Idol, Spandau Ballet, Adam and the Ants, ABC, Bananarama, Soft Cell, Tears for Fears and Dupeche Mode. There would be one British band who would not only benefit from being on MTV, but would define the music video aesthetic for the rest of the decade, and that band was Duran Duran.

9. A nursery for Hollywood directors

Like Mulcahy, a lot of music video directors would develop reputations for being able to deliver clips that would catapult bands into superstardom using the power of MTV. A nursery of creative talent was created by the industry that sprung up around MTV as record labels began investing budgets in music video production. Many directors from the MTV days would make the leap to Hollywood. Mulcahy was hired to direct the cult hit Highlander. Other notable directors who made the transition include: David Fincher and Michael Bay.

13. Moonwalking into lounge rooms nation-wide

Before 1983, Michael Jackson struggled to get played on MTV. Legend has it that the president of CBS Records International, Walter Yetnikoff, threatened to pull all their artists from MTV if they continued to ignore Jackson, who had just put out Thriller and submitted the video for Billie Jean. CBS had Billy Joel, Cyndi Lauper and Bruce Springsteen on their books.

Tensions were high between CBS and MTV but then something big happened: Jackson performed during a television special to commemorate Mowtown’s 25th anniversary. Jackson took to the stage to perform Billie Jean in a fedora, black sequin jacket, and glove. Mid-performance, Jackson debuted his iconic moonwalk and people went wild. Following the performance, Thriller began to sell a million copies a week and certified Jackson as a solo artist. MTV began playing Billie Jean in high rotation and Jackson would become a staple of the channel setting a new standard for what a music video was with Thriller and Beat It.

14. Michael Jackson verses Prince

The arrival of Jackson on MTV (finally) paved the way for other black artists who were added to the playlist. The other act who was put in high rotation in the wake of Billie Jean was Prince. Little Red Corvette was put into overdrive on MTV and Prince blew the minds of teenagers across America — especially in smaller towns. Jackson and Prince had an intense rivalry. In the MTV era their extravagant videos were seen as a way for them to one-up each other. Jackson dominated the pop world with Thriller, so Prince replied with Purple Rain. It was perfect for MTV because the videos helped define the channel as it continued to revolutionise the music industry and become a dominant force in pop culture.

15. The holy trio of MTV

Jackson and Prince became the first big stars of MTV in the 80s but a third was about to arrive: Madonna. The popstar’s debut album failed to become a hit and Madonna only managed to make an impression in the dance club scene. One of the places to embrace Madonna from the outset was Australia, thanks to the work of Molly Meldrum on Countdown to promote her as the next big thing.

Madonna released her second album, Like A Virgin, along with a salacious music video that immediately went into high rotation on MTV. Albums sales rocketed and the title track dominated the charts. Madonna embodied everything that MTV was looking for as it moved away from its album-orientated rock format and into the pop megastar era.

16. 1984: MTV reaches its apex

The music channel was no longer considered a fad in 1984. It was in nearly every American home, record companies (and advertisers) were spending millions on music videos, and everything that was cool in the 80s could be sourced back to MTV as a pop cultural phenomenon. To celebrate their dominance, MTV hosted its first awards show: The Video Music Awards (VMAs). Dan Aykroyd and Bette Midler hosted the event at Radio City Music Hall, New York City. Madonna made everyone forget who actually won an award that year with her performance of Like A Virgin where she appeared on stage atop a giant wedding cake in a wedding dress. The performance was punctuated by Madonna’s odd dance moves that morphed into a lot of thriving and humping. Again, it led to more album sales for Madonna and MTV’s stature grew.

25. Get out the plaid

In 1991, MTV played the video for Nirvana’s Smells Like Teen Spirit and a gigantic shift happened in the music industry toward grunge. The rise of alternative rock was totally in opposition to what MTV stood for in the early 90s, so they underwent another identity crisis.

MTV flooded their playlist with videos from Stone Temple Pilots, Rage Against the Machine, Marilyn Manson, Pearl Jam, Tool, Beck, Radiohead, and The Smashing Pumpkins. These bands also paved the way for a second wave of auteur music video directors such as Spike Jonze, Michel Gondry, Samuel Bayer, Mark Romanek, Jonathan Glazer and F. Gary Gray. A bulk of these filmmakers would go on to have successful careers making films.

26. Rock the vote

MTV is credited as having an influence on the 1992 Presidential Election by getting more young people interested in voting for the first time. Candidate Bill Clinton appeared on a show titled ‘Choose or Lose: Facing the Future with Bill Clinton’. It’s where Clinton was asked the famous question about whether he ‘inhaled’ while smoking weed in his college days. A majority of the youth vote that contributed to Clinton’s election is attributed to MTV”.

Even though there are cynics and detractors of MTV, there is no denying that it has a huge impact on a generation. I know that MTV could not be revived and return to what it was from the 1980s. My love and admiration for music deepened when I started tuning into MTV from the 1990s. Even though MTV had a fairly rocky start, the sheer excitement of its launch on 1st August, 1981 cannot be understated. Newswise looked back on the launch of an iconic station that made music mode visual:

“Newswise — MANHATTAN, Kan. -- "Ladies and gentlemen, rock and roll."

That declaration was given nearly 30 years ago with little fanfare and was only audible to a few thousand people in northern New Jersey. But the launch of Music Television, also known as MTV, on Aug. 1, 1981, had permanent implications for the music industry and popular culture, according to two Kansas State University music experts -- an impact foreshadowed by images of the moon landing that accompanied MTV's launch.

The network's first music video was "Video Killed the Radio Star" by the Buggles, an intentional selection according to one of those experts.

"That song came out a couple of years prior to the launch of MTV," said Nora Lewis, assistant professor of music. "When MTV launched, it featured videos 24 hours a day on every day of the week. MTV creators knew its cultural and musical impact would be huge, and the selection of 'Video Killed the Radio Star' served as the perfect harbinger for its impending significance."

MTV initially had a limited audience. Cable television was not widely available in the early 1980s. As the popularity and scope expanded, MTV began to effectively define popular culture and the music industry in an unprecedented manner, according to another K-State music expert.

"Popular music became more visual," said Steven Maxwell, assistant professor of music. "Dancing styles and clothing styles became increasingly more important. It also helped break the color barrier for popular music on television. Michael Jackson's 'Billie Jean' video was shown in 1983 and helped MTV and Jackson gain in popularity."

Many networks followed MTV's example and began playing music videos. The success of MTV also spawned several sister networks that became the primary areas for playing music videos. It was an ideal opening for reality television, a burgeoning portion of the network's programming. Reality television was introduced to MTV viewers in 1992 with "The Real World." The music programming on MTV and related networks would never be the same and it could be focused on one factor”.

I am going to round off soon enough. There are a lot of articles that discuss the highs and lows of MTVs. From its fairly brief run to the way it put Black artists’ videos on the screen, everyone will have their own take. Many grew up after MTV changed from a music T.V. station to one more concerned with reality shows. If you are not aware of what MTV used to be, go back and do some research and watch videos on YouTube.

I think the boldness and boundary-pushing element of MTV was what stood it out and ensured that it is in the music history books. Medium explored this more when they dissected the impact of the station of musical television and culture:  

“The one thing that MTV never lost throughout its entire run is its ability to push the envelope with its programming. They put black artists into their rotation when it didn’t seem popular to do so. They gave comedians a shot at getting their material out there, no matter how racy. Their news and documentary broadcasts were cutting edge and showed real life problems that people in the channel’s demographic were dealing with. Even now, MTV’s unscripted programming is some of the most inclusive in terms of portraying people of all races, religions and sexual orientations.

MTV has been a pioneer in music television and cultural programming. Early on, the channel was a force in the music industry, popularizing the music video and launching the careers of many artists along the way. Though it has gotten away from the music programming it was once known for, its ability to break boundaries has continued to guide the channel’s current programming. MTV might not be the musical influencer that it once was and probably never will be again, but it will always be remembered for what it has done, no matter what comes next”.

Not only did MTV become this social lubricant and must-see channel. People watched the videos and discovered artists and albums they might not have been aware of before. Soundcheck ran an article in 2011 to mark thirty years of the station. They spoke with various figures in music and the media to highlight what MTV meant to them:

“Walter Podrazik, Consulting Curator for the Museum of Broadcast Communications: “The year before MTV began, CNN had launched. That all news service demonstrated that cable could offer an option that, once experienced, could be readily embraced (and justified by adults): all-news, all-the-time, on television. Little more than a year later, MTV upped the ante. The difference with MTV was that it was entirely superfluous but absolutely necessary — at least for the younger members of the household. That younger demographic then lent a sense of urgency to adding cable access to the household. It’s no coincidence that 'I Want My MTV' became the new generation’s catch phrase. It embodied the voice of that younger generation; this is something they wanted, they needed, now! The younger household members would consider MTV as the reason for having cable, and would embrace the channel as part of their own up-to-the-minute-social-standing-lifestyle."

Sasha Frere-Jones, pop critic for the New Yorker: "I’ve been watching the first 24 hours of MTV, and they are were pretty remarkable, every video they played. The No. 5 video is Ph.D's “Little Susie’s On The Up” — nobody has ever heard that song. The first song they played is kind of cool: “Video Killed the Radio Star” by The Buggles. There’s something very knowing about video killing off another form, and that’s not entirely true, but it certainly presages the moment where the MP3 kills the entire form and perhaps an entire industry. They knew that a format change, a technical change, could create a social and behavioral change. And they were right! The minute you could download music, the entire game changed. Whether it was the age when videos mattered a lot from the mid ‘80s to the mid ‘90s, or Total Request Live, which was an early form of social media in its own way, or the birth of reality TV that came after, MTV’s legacy is kind of huge no matter what anyone thinks of them now”.

On 1st August, MTV turns forty. To some, it was before their time or means very little. To those who were young when it launched, it was a massive deal! I and so many others have affection for a station that opened our eyes to music and videos in a new way. In the days before YouTube, one could only see music videos on T.V. I bought so many singles and albums on the strength of the videos I saw on MTV. I also loved the interviews, features and chat on the station. It was a one-stop portal for all the latest news and releases. Because of that, on 1st August, I will…

SALUTE MTV.

FEATURE: Second Spin: Placebo - Sleeping with Ghosts

FEATURE:

 

 

Second Spin

ttt.jpg

Placebo - Sleeping with Ghosts

___________

SOME say…

ree.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Placebo (Brian Molko centre) in 1997/PHOTO CREDIT: Pat Pope/Rex/Shutterstock

Placebo didn’t match the excellence of their eponymous debut (1996) and its follow-up, Without You I'm Nothing. That album especially (released in 1998) was one of my favourites from high school. With Placebo classics like Every You Every Me and Pure Morning, how could that album not receive huge acclaim?! Although their subsequent albums have gained enough praise, they have not scored the same big and consistent reviews as their earlier work. I feel their fourth studio album, Sleeping with Ghosts, is one that warrants new attention. Released in 2003, there were those who were kind. That being said, I have seen a lot of mixed reviews. Whilst not my favourite Placebo album, it is one that has some brilliant numbers on it. English Summer Rain and The Bitter End are among my favourite Placebo tracks. Perhaps a lack of Glam and the sort of stomp that greeted their first couple of albums meant that some critics were not willing to score Sleeping with Ghosts too highly. If you are not overly-familiar with Placebo’s back catalogue, I would urge people to give albums like Sleeping with Ghosts a spin (go back and check their first three albums). Before sourcing from a couple of reviews, here is some information about the themes explored on the album:

“Frontman Brian Molko, who is known to be a fan of the band Sonic Youth, references lyrics from their album Sister on "Plasticine" ("Beauty lies inside the eye of another youthful dream" directly references "Beauty lies in the eyes of another's dream" from Sonic Youth's "Beauty Lies in the Eye").

The album has several songs based on a theme of relationships, such as relationships that end badly ("The Bitter End"), power struggles in relationships ("Special Needs") or the idea that some are meant to be eternal soulmates (the title track). Brian Molko told Kerrang! magazine: "I'm looking back to what's happened in my past emotional decade, trying to understand it. Trying to exorcise the ghosts and the demons of relationships past. It's the old cliché of it being therapeutic but it does work for me in that way."

Another interview has Molko explaining:

The album title's about carrying the ghosts of your relationships with you, to the point where sometimes a smell or a situation or an item of clothing they bought brings a person back. For me it's about the relationship that you have with your memories. They inhabit your dreams sometimes. There can be a lot in the future that's gonna remind you of the ghost of relationships past. So I see the album as a collection of short stories about a handful of relationships. Most of them mine. In a way writing the songs helps me to get a lot of the nasty feelings off my chest and put them in a box, and therefore have a bit more of an objective discourse with those emotions because you've done something positive with them, you've rid yourself of them”.

Apart from a couple of weaker tracks ending the album, I wonder why a lot of critics were fairly harsh towards a strong album with plenty of highlights. Listening to it now, I am picking up on things that I might have missed when I listened back in 2003.  I shall wrap things up in a bit. I think it is important to put together some reviews – to show what critics made of Sleeping with Ghosts.

When they sat down to listen to the album, AllMusic made the following observations. Whilst they found some positives, the overall tone was a little mixed:

“Since the band's 1996 self-titled debut, Placebo has penchant for delivering spiky, stylishly slick pop songs, in particular "Nancy Boy" and "Pure Morning." Brian Molko's femme-like vocals and androgynous appearance is matched with Stefan Olsdal and Steve Hewitt's solid glam-inspired instrumentation, giving Placebo a spot of its own in the typically cheeky Brit-pop scene. Fourth album Sleeping with Ghosts works with the band's post-grunge/experimental desire to keep things campy and emotionally intact; however, Placebo's a bit reserved this time around. While Without You I'm Nothing boasted a glam rock edge and Black Market Music captured more of a punk-glam polish, Sleeping With Ghosts crawls with mopish, gnarled ballads. "Bulletproof Cupid" is a vibrant album opener with classic guitar snarling, but the album's intensity quickly drops when "English Summer Rain"'s flimsy electronic bits lose step with Molko's dismal interpretation of nature. The electric riffs of "The Bitter End" stick with Placebo's frenzied rock style, and "Plasticine" and "Second Sight" are equally cool dark pop, but stand in contrast to the bigger standouts of "Taste in Men" from Black Market Music and "Every You Every Me" from Without You I'm Nothing. Placebo has an undeniable swagger, and any attempt to tame its overconfident character simply doesn't work. The whiny, synth-driven "Protect Me from What I Want" is a perfect example; Molko's sharp wit is much too literal in criticizing social conformity, typically mocking and self-deprecating as in the song "Special Needs." Sleeping with Ghosts doesn't venture out lyrically or sonically, but that's not to say it's a bad album. The members of Placebo, now in their early thirties, move beyond the spit and scowl of their previous albums, and new fans will find Sleeping with Ghosts to be a good record. Old fans, though, might think the band wimped out while growing up”.

Before I finish off, I want to quote from The A.V. Club. I feel their approach and discussion of Sleeping with Ghosts had more positives and pluses about it:

“Even though the European success of Placebo's first three albums hasn't translated into more than cult stardom in the U.S., the London glam-rock trio doesn't change much for its fourth full-length, Sleeping With Ghosts. The new disc continues to alternate frenzied guitar charges with spacey ballads and danceable pop, all derived from the angst and adventurousness of The Smashing Pumpkins, Rush, and David Bowie. The proggier elements of Placebo's sound have diminished over time, but the arena-filling ambition and the decadent posturing of high-voiced, warbling singer-guitarist Brian Molko remain. Molko and his bandmates are a gleaming ennui machine, converting romantic misery and punk aggression into polished, pretty expressions of melancholy. They also have the U.K. rocker gift for perfect singles, in this case "The Bitter End," a vague breakup prognosis set to the locomotive rumble of bass and drums and an increasingly ethereal set of propulsive guitar stings. Placebo matches that high point with a handful of others, including the upbeat loser anthem "This Picture," the pluck-and-fuzz guitar duet (and groupie kiss-off) "Special Needs," and the this-world-sucks-but-you're-beautiful dream-pop of the title track. Placebo may never reach an American audience past its established fans, but those fans ought to gravitate to Sleeping With Ghosts' uncluttered, moody niche.”.

Make sure that you check out Sleeping with Ghosts and give it some time. It is a solid album with only a few weak tracks. There is talk of a new Placebo album arriving this year. Having been going since 1994, Placebo show no signs of slowing! Whilst I am not smitten with all their albums, I do like Sleeping with Ghosts. It is one that, in my opinions, is worthy of…

BIGGER applause.

FEATURE: 50 Words for ‘No’: Kate Bush and the Struggle with the American Market

FEATURE:

 

 

50 Words for ‘No’

wwww.png

PHOTO CREDIT: Guido Harari 

Kate Bush and the Struggle with the American Market

                                                                                  ___________

NOT to duplicate what I have written previously…

qqq.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: RexUSA

but I have been researching Kate Bush for a new project that I want to put out next summer. It is concerned with the fortieth-anniversary since she recorded her debut album, The Kick Inside. As per of that, I was seeing how that album was received in America. I don’t think Bush was known widely across the country that early in her career. I am going to drop in a recent podcast from the U.S. where British journalist Jude Rogers discussed Bush’s 2005 double album, Aerial. Whilst it has (clearly) not dented her influence and popularity, it seems strange that there is this gulf between British/European audiences and those in America. As I have said before, Bush did not really appear in America much through her career. Pre-Internet, there would have been few channels to discover her music. Unless a radio station or T.V. show was not playing her music, it might have been difficult to hear her stuff. One can labour and discus why she was so much more revered here than in the U.S. Look at the world today and there are plenty of American artists who take inspiration from Kate Bush. From St. Vincent to Rufus Wainwright, her music reached the U.S. and compelled a lot of artists. I have discussed chart positions a few times through the years. Recently, I revisited that subject and stated how there was unpredictable trend regarding her success. The singles from The Kick Inside and Lionheart did well – if you average them out – in the U.K. and Europe. The Dreaming did not fare so well regarding chart positions and, actually, one would have expected some of the singles from Hounds of Love to do better than they did!

Not that Bush herself would sweat too much about the singles’ positions - so long as people bought and liked the albums. The U.K. has been her biggest and most consistently successful market. There are reasons why Bush did not promote in America too much. When The Tour of Life started in 1979, it was intended for the U.K. and Europe. I feel extending it to America would have been exhaustive and problematic! At that point (1979), she did not have enough recognition there to sell a lot of tickets. It is odd that America did not pick up on her. She recorded an alternate video for Wuthering Heights for the U.S. – the U.K. version was deemed as too weird and intense. That single did nothing there. In fact, if one looks at the singles’ positions, she did not find success until Hounds of Love’s Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) reached thirty. Alongside some low-charting singles (The Man with the Child went to eighty-five; Rubberband Girl to eighty-eight), here is a market that was probably up for grabs but never taken. Bush did promote Hounds of Love in America; the first album of hers to really make an impression. It was curious listening to the Late Era podcast. Aerial reached the top-fifty in the album charts in 2005. Looking through the discography, and the width between the U.K. and U.S. is immense!

Whereas all of her studio albums reached the top-ten here, only six charted at all in America! From The Dreaming hitting a lowly one-hundred-and-fifty-seven to The Red Shoes getting to twenty-eight, it has been a rather unpredictable and fallow canvas. It is clear that there was a period where Bush ignited interest in the U.S. after a while. Hounds of Love reached thirty and, a year later, she released the greatest hits album, The Whole Story. EMI saw that there was this interest from America. In 2021, well over four decades since Bush entered with Wuthering Heights, I scratch my head and wonder whether America just didn’t ‘get’ Bush…or whether she and EMI were not concerned about success there. Bush wouldn’t be such an icon and popular if American fans and musicians had overlooked her. Today, there is so much love for her. New generations are discovering her music and one can hear American artists come through who have clearly been influenced by her music! Even so, there is far less recognition of Bush in America compared to the rest of the world. I feel it was her post-Hounds of Love released turned the tide slightly. I like the fact her albums from Hounds of Love got into the top-fifty. 2011’s 50 Words for Snow did well here and Europe (it also got to twenty-two in Australia). It only reached eighty-three in the U.S. It is not a disaster though, considering Aerial made the top-fifty (just), what happened in 2011 to result in a low chart position!?

To me, it is more to do with the tone and sound of the album, rather than there being a decline in interest. Looking at other albums, there are one or two that charted. The Whole Story, luckily, charted – it would have been a bit mystifying if the U.S. market turned away only a year after showing affection towards Hounds of Love! Her live album, 2016’s Before the Dawn, was a very minor success. Of course, one cannot define an artist’s worth by chart positions and sales alone! I like the fact that one of the albums considered to be among her weakest, The Red Shoes, charted highest in America! One can say that a relatively invisibility in terms of promotion and live appearances was a factor. Bush hardly performed a lot in the U.K. and Europe, mind. Maybe American audiences are calibrated slightly differently regarding their preferences. Writing for The New Yorker, Margaret Talbot discussed her experiences with Bush’s music. There are a couple of passages that struck me. One refers to a perception of Bush’s music and her as a person; the other, how Talbot sort of lost connection with her music in the 1990s:

“Thomson contends that, at a time when musical camps were more fiercely armored than they are now (remember when people had to choose, absurdly, between punk and disco?), Bush got a bad rap from some music journalists for being a dreamy middle-class girl rather than an angry working-class bloke. There was grumbling about her tweeness, her witchy, unapologetic femininity. “Most of her records,” the jazz critic Richard Cook, writing about Bush in Sounds magazine, complained, “smell of tarot cards, kitchen curtains and lavender pillows.” That said, John Lydon—a.k.a. Johnny Rotten—loved her music. In a BBC documentary about Bush, from 2014, he allows that “a lot of my friends at the time couldn’t bear” Bush’s high-pitched, passionate warbling on “Wuthering Heights” and other early songs. “They just thought it was too much”—and, indeed, Bush is the high priestess of too much.

I’d more or less fallen off the Kate Bush bandwagon in the nineties, so there were two albums in the boxed set that were almost entirely new to me: the two-disk “Aerial,” from 2005, and “50 Words for Snow,” from 2011. Neither is much like her earlier work; they are quieter, smoother, more jazz-inflected, less ahead of their time than outside of it. They can sound a little hermetic—and, listening to them, you do sometimes wish that Bush, who has said in interviews that she doesn’t consume much contemporary music, fired up the old Spotify now and then. She doesn’t throw her voice up and down and all around with the same wild-child exuberance. (The childlike notes come from her son, whose singing and speaking voices are on both records.) But both albums are powerful mood pieces, full of lovely moments. “How to Be Invisible,” from “Aerial,” has a bluesy, sexy, echoey guitar line and some of Bush’s finest lyrics, describing an introvert’s spell for going unseen (“Eye of Braille, hem of anorak, stem of wallflower, hair of doormat.”) “The Coral Room,” from the same album, is a heartbreaking hymn on the workings of memory, the passage of time, and her love for her late mother. The album “50 Words for Snow” is lush and sombre, with melodies that eddy and drift, and a thirteen-minute song about a woman’s affair with a snowman, which somehow manages not to make you laugh.

I shall finish up in a minute. Kate Bush will never lose popularity in America. Stations play her music and there will always be awareness of what she has performed and recorded. Not concerned too much with cracking America, the lack of big sales and chart positions there is not something that hurt her or caused too much concern with the label. What intrigues me is whether there was a single factor as to why U.S. buyers did not take to Bush earlier in her career. It can be quite difficult predicting which artists will succeed (in the U.S.) and which will struggle. Each country is different in terms of musical tastes. Perhaps Bush was seen as ‘too British’ or odd. Maybe her subject matter was not that accessible or she was, by not touring, seen as a bit distant and aloof. I don’t think any of those explanations fit. In 2011, an interesting NPR piece reacted to journalist Lee Zimmerman laying out reasons as to why America didn’t care for Kate Bush:

“At least, that's the claim set forth by Lee Zimmerman of the Broward/Palm Beach New Times. In a blog post published on Bush's birthday, he laments the lack of traction that the British singer/songwriter has experienced in the United States.

So now that I've lovingly shut down all of Zimmerman's arguments, how to explain Bush's relative lack of success in this country? Well, she certainly didn't fit any of the molds of what women were doing in pop music in the 1980s; only Madonna (who, for whatever it's worth, is a mere 17 days younger than Bush) was as chameleonic, but she was both more overtly sexual and more cannily club-oriented in a particularly dance-crazy decade. And Peter Gabriel notwithstanding, art rock wasn't exactly a ticket to mass success.

nnsn.jpg

 But it might be that Bush never broke through in the U.S. because she just wasn't that interested in it. Columbia certainly was, wanting to prove with The Sensual World that their new investment wasn't just a one-hit wonder. But looking back at Bush's career, there's a nagging sense that if American success was truly something she'd wanted, she would have booked those tours, done that press and schmoozed radio and MTV. She didn't, and as a result or not, she remains the province of a small group of highly devoted American fans”.

There is a slightly snobbish and dismissive tone to the article. There is this split between the buying public in the U.S. and the critics compared to artists there and other fans. Those who understand her music and truly invest are deeply passionate and extoll her brilliance. Many Americans have been less patient and willing to give necessary focus to a truly groundbreaking artist. I don’t think it is patriotism that accounts for Bush’s success in the U.K. It annoys me that there has been this comparable lack of commercial success in America. I don’t think she will travel or promote there before her career is through. If some critics are crude and a little ignorant, one only need to look at social media to show that plenty of Americans hold Kate Bush very dear to their hearts. Even though her albums and singles have not charted hugely well through the years in the U.S., musicians, fans and admirers in the country will remember her and play her music…

FOR generations to come.

FEATURE: (There Is) No Greater Love: Remembering the Iconic Amy Winehouse

FEATURE:

 

 

(There Is) No Greater Love

ee.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Amy Winehouse at the Prince's Trust Urban Music Festival at Earl's Court, London in May 2004/PHOTO CREDIT: David Montgomery

Remembering the Iconic Amy Winehouse

___________

ON 23rd July…

cc.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Amy Winehouse in promotional images for Lioness: Hidden Treasures/PHOTO CREDIT: Bryan Adams

it will be ten years since we lost the immense talent of Amy Winehouse. Taken from us at the tragically young age of twenty-seven, I wanted to post a final feature that marks a decade since we said goodbye to one of the most powerful and inspiring voices of her generation. I am not going to go into the controversial side of her life and how she died – that would not be fitting or appropriate. Instead, I wanted to spend a little time talking about her legacy. Born in Enfield, London, Camden’s adopted daughter released two studio albums in her lifetime: 2003’s Frank and 2006’s Back to Black. I am not sure how close Winehouse was to releasing a third studio album. Given the incredible reception to Back to Black, there would have been a degree of pressure on her shoulders to top that work and provide something that was a step on. 2011’s Lioness: Hidden Treasures is a posthumous compilation that combines some unreleased or rare originals alongside some covers. We get a glimpse of where Winehouse might have headed, in addition to how brilliant an interpreter of other people’s work she was. Whilst some are all too eager to demonise Winehouse, there are many more who lionise and salute a wonderful talent. Many new features will go online that mark ten years since Winehouse died (the documentary, Reclaiming Amy, is broadcast on 23rd July; it is well worth watching). I want to bring in a few older tributes that explore her fascinating love of music - and what she left behind. One can debate ‘what ifs’ and predict where Winehouse would have headed.

Would she have produced many more albums and turned her life around? Although addiction and her struggles are a big part of her story, one cannot define her by it. I feel Winehouse would have developed as an artist and we would, no doubt now, be readying ourselves for new work from her. I think that the press intrusion was as big a factor as anything as to why she was so troubled. I am not going to dwell on that. Instead, I want to source from a few articles that highlight Winehouse’s legacy. In this feature from The Sunday Post from a couple of weeks ago, Stuart Cosgrove looked back on an amazing and unique artist:

“Camden was uniquely rich in youth and pop culture. It was her first real love affair. From her early teenage days, she feasted on the neighbourhood’s rich relationship with rock and soul. It was an area of old London pubs, pop-up street markets and dance venues, a simmering stew of music and fashion, of the stylishly old and the shockingly new.

Significantly, it was also the home of vintage fashion, decades of secondhand clothes recycled by stall-owners, young designers and local street kids. It was in Camden at the height of retro chic that she developed her trademark beehive hairdo and the spider-black eyeliner that made her such a visible presence on stage.

Like Paul Weller, Winehouse had a curatorial personality. She delved into pop and soul history, digging out old CDs and buying scratched vinyl in junk shops in North London, excavating her way through rockabilly, the blues, northern soul and showtunes seeking inspiration for her own songs or a hidden gem worthy of revival.

One of the songs she picked up along the way was Toots & The Maytals’ 1969 ska classic Monkey Man, which she performed live on television with Jools Holland, another was The Temptations song Ain’t Too Proud To Beg which she recorded in concert with the Rolling Stones.

My personal favourite is her achingly grandiose version of Gerry Goffin and Carole King’s Brill Building standard, Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow, originally a hit for the girl group The Shirelles.

The past fascinated Amy Winehouse and it permeated her music. It was her father, a London taxi driver who introduced her to the crooners and to show-tunes music, it was her grandmother Cynthia, a cabaret singer, who inspired her love of jazz. When her grandmother passed away in 2006, Amy visited a tattoo artist and had an effigy of her inked into her arm, styled as an old-school pin-up girl.

Although Back To Black is her requiem for lost love, it was the nagging disobedience of Rehab – a song about her father’s unsuccessful attempt to put Winehouse in a rehabilitation clinic – that came to dominate the charts and speak to disaffected youth around the world. She wrote the song in only a couple of hours, after a casual conversation with her writing partner Mark Ronson, and it became an anthem for a troubled generation, as resonant to its era as The Who’s My Generation or The Undertones’ Teenage Kicks had been in the decades before.

In 2011 Winehouse made her final recording and it proved to be epic in many ways. She joined forces with her favourite singer, the crooner Tony Bennett to perform a version of Body And Soul, another song about lost love and the emotional wreckage of breaking up.

On hearing of her death, Bennett issued a statement: “Amy Winehouse was an artist of immense proportions, and I am deeply saddened to learn of her tragic passing. She was an extraordinary musician with a rare intuition as a vocalist and I am truly devastated that her exceptional talent has come to such an early end”.

It is worth quoting from The Guardian’s article of 2012. They discussed the job of assessing Winehouse’s work following her death and working through the archives. They state that, despite the way some painted her, she left something very special behind:  

“Last December, Island Records released Lioness: Hidden Treasures, a collection of unreleased songs and demos selected by Winehouse's family along with producers Mark Ronson and Salaam Remi. It immediately reached No 1 in the UK album charts, selling almost 200,000 copies in its first week. To some it seemed rushed out with undue haste, but for others it met not only a demand but a need – solace for the devastated fans who craved more of her very particular brand of salty, rough-edged soul.

It was also, crucially, the first step in the shift away from the Winehouse of common caricature, the Olive Oyl figure with the beehive, and the drug abuse, the saucy mouth and the baleful talk of "Blake Incarcerated"; the artist people had sadly come to expect – who had once offered to lamp a member of the audience at Glastonbury, and who had last graced a stage at a festival in Serbia, where she stood swaying and mumbling before a baying audience of 20,000.

How we process the death of an artist and how their legacy is then established is a peculiar and somewhat unsettling art. There is a gulf to be bridged between the rawness of a musician's departure and the new world of biopics and boxsets; a period of grace, in which their image and their music must lie in state.

But the velocity of our world now, and the encyclopaedic inclinations of modern technology, make this period of sitting musical shiva harder. In our desire to refresh and consume new entertainment, we are eager to forget that which went before; and should we wish to remember, all of the misdemeanours, the unflattering photographs, the phone camera footage of that shambolic performance in Belgrade are preserved online in perpetuity.

On the cover of its latest issue, Q magazine labels Winehouse "the voice of our time". It is a bold claim (and some might argue that the true voice of our time is the autotuned drone of American pop), but it is another stride towards the cultivation of her legacy, the fading of those images of the singer roaming the streets with bloodied feet and wild eyes.

After all, though she provided fodder for the gossip columns and the morally outraged, Winehouse also brought something remarkable to the music world, a tarry, beetle-black voice and lyrical humour. A songwriter who wrote of an intensely female experience, of the pain of love, as well as the hunger for sex, drugs and alcohol. And, of course, she helped create an appetite for the soulful British voice, paving the way for the likes of Adele, Duffy and Plan B. It is the voice that we hope will be remembered”.

Since that 2012, there are so many other artists who have been influenced by Winehouse. She was such a powerful force in the world. Her voice was so rich, expressive and stirring! Her lyrical voice, too, was personal yet universal. She could perfectly describe the sides of her personality whilst also speaking to so many other people. From the more intimate songs on her debut, Frank, to the sweeping and bigger numbers on Back to Black, it is no surprise that Winehouse is still being talked about so fondly a decade after her death.

There is no doubt that Winehouse is an icon. It is bittersweet remembering her now. After a decade, I feel there has been so much new investigation and love of her music. Besides artists influenced directly by her work, there are many others who have discovered her music and have been hugely moved by it. The final article that I want to draw from is from 2016. It wonders what music would have been were it not for Winehouse’s undeniable gifts and influence:

“What would the music world look like in 2016 without Amy Winehouse, particularly for artists in the UK? Where better to start than with Adele, one of the best-selling artists in the world today. While fellow Londoner Adele is quite clearly an exceptional talent in her own right, many have questioned whether she could have sold more than 100 million records had Amy not passed her the baton, particularly in terms of trans-Atlantic success. Adele said so much herself in a 2011 tribute:

“Amy paved the way for artists like me, and made people excited about British music again. I don’t think she ever realised just how brilliant she was, and how important she is.”

One of the most original artists of recent decades, Lana Del Ray, has expressed her admiration for Amy’s strong sense of authenticity. She put it beautifully when she said: “I believe she was who she was, and in that way she got it right.”

dsdsd.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Florence Welch 

Florence Welch, of Florence And The Machine, has stated that seeing one of Amy’s early Glastonbury performances was a big moment of inspiration for her: “Seeing her up there made me think, wow, there is a place for female singer-songwriters in this world," she said, in 2011.

Pop singer, Ellie Goulding, like Adele, has gone on record to say she owes a debt to Amy Winehouse for being able to reach American audiences as quickly as she did; and Sam Smith and Paloma Faith - both also from London - are very similar musically (Faith also notably has hairstyles and outfits not dissimilar to those worn by Winehouse), and it is difficult to imagine their soul pop reaching such wide audiences had Amy not come before them.

Quirk-pop sensation, Lady Gaga, has also praised the iconic songstress, putting forward her belief that she made the music scene a much less banal place, and made it easier for eccentric artists to break through. And frequent collaborator and producer, Mark Ronson, described her death as “losing a musical soulmate.”

Amy Winehouse is immortalised in a statue in her beloved Camden Town, and also in wonderful street art tributes around the capital. With musicians like her, it is easy to focus too much on ‘what could have been’ thoughts, especially when considering how one of the most famous singers of modern times only released two albums. But it is a testament to how phenomenal those two albums are. After her death, record labels actively sought singers who were British, female, and had a fierce sense of independence. Amy Winehouse bemoaned the quality of the music industry in her early years, and she left it a vastly better place than when she found it. For that reason, songs such as Back to Black and Love Is a Losing Game will endure forever”.

On 23rd July, the world will mark a decade since Amy Winehouse died. We will share memories of her music and try to articulate what she meant to us. To me and so many others, her music is still in our heads. It is so immensely affecting and memorable! I do not think we will see anyone like her ever again. Some quibble whether she was the voice of her generation – I believe that she was! Although it has been a decade since we lost the amazing Amy Winehouse, this icon will…

NEVER be forgotten.