FEATURE: Spotlight: Grandmas House

FEATURE:

Spotlight

 PHOTO CREDIT: Rosie Carne 

Grandmas House

___________

LIKE all of my Spotlight features…

 PHOTO CREDIT: Rosie Carne

I want to get to the bottom of an act through interviews and reviews. Grandmas House consist of Poppy, Yasmin and Zoe. They released the Grandmas House E.P. late last year, and they are being tipped as one of the bands to watch closely this year. The Bristol-based trio have an incredible chemistry and sound that we will all be hearing a lot more of soon enough. I will come to a review of that E.P. towards the end. I also want to bring in a couple of recent interviews. Prior to that, I want to look a bit further back to see how Grandmas House were being talked about. If you are fresh to the trio, I hope that the information below is of use. Get in Her Ears spoke with Grandmas House early last year. They asked about, among other things, their incredible track, Always Happy:

“Hello Grandmas House! For anyone who doesn’t know, can you explain how you met and originally formed as a band?

Yasmin: We all went to uni together in London. Then me and Poppy moved to Bristol afterwards and then we dragged Zoe along with us well.

Poppy: Yeah, we were like “you’ll love it here!”

Yasmin: We did have a different bassist before Zoe actually, who we also met at uni. She lived in London still and she was commuting so much and that didn’t really work out. Then Zoe moved to Bristol and became our new bassist, so that worked out pretty well. We’ve all been living together now for three years.

Does living together make things easier in terms of recording and writing songs?

Yasmin: We usually go into the studio now that we’re getting a bit more serious about music, but when we started the band it was just demos recorded on all of our phones. We didn’t know how to edit music so we just cropped all the recordings together. But now we try to go to a professional and take it into a studio and stuff. Obviously because of Covid-19 and all the studios being shut, we did have to record a few things from home. We did a few vocals on the mic from home, but that’s it.

‘Always Happy’ is a song about the misconceptions we have about people’s confidence in social settings and also online. Talk me through what the track’s about, as I know it’s based on your own experiences of performing on stage as well.

Yasmin: I feel like everyone is a bit taken aback by how we are onstage and how loud our music is, especially because our name is Grandmas House, which is quite calm…

Zoe: The track is a mix of thoughts about social anxiety, performing on stage and how people perceive you online, as well as how you show yourself online too. In between songs when we’re on stage, people have said we’re always so smiley, and then we suddenly just start screaming again. There’s been a few gigs where Poppy has been on the drums, looking really, really into it and angry and then as soon as a song ends she’s doing this cute giggle.

Yasmin: I think we’re definitely confident off stage as well. The song is definitely more about mental health and social anxiety that is generally present, but that doesn’t mean you can’t be talkative or chatty after a show. I think you definitely just see a snippet of us, or any other band, when we’re on stage. You don’t see how nervous we are before as well.

Zoe: That adds to the adrenaline we get whilst we’re playing  though. It’s been built up beforehand which is great, so performing is definitely an outlet for that”.

CLUNK MAGAZINE chatted with Grandmas House after they released their E.P. (one that is worth getting on vinyl). As a band who have moved cities and are in a different setting to the one they started in, you can feel that they feel more settled and inspired now. Grandmas House discussed the Bristol music scene:

 “Bristol based post-punk trio Grandmas House recently shared their explosive debut self-titled EP, four tracks of poignent, anarchic music. It’s hard not to be lured in by their frantic sound, especially in a live setting. Since this release we have been eager to find out more about one of Bristol’s, if not the UK’s most exciting post-punk outfits.

Recently, we had the pleasure of asking Poppy Dodgson, vocalist and drummer of the band. We discussed the bands decision to move to Bristol, bands they’ve been enjoying, and much more!

Kieran: Hello Grandmas House, how are you!?

Poppy: Good thank you! We’ve been LOVING touring around the UK over the past few weeks so very happy and very tired!

Kieran: So, you all met at University in London but decided to move down to Bristol, what was it that prompted the move and how have you found it?

Poppy: I’m (Poppy) from Bristol, and knew the other two would love it so dragged them home with me! We absolutely love living here, the music scene is amazing and the people are lovely so we haven’t wanted to go anywhere else since!

Kieran: Has moving cities changed your songwriting or sound at all?

Poppy: There’s a real post punk sound in Bristol at the moment which has definitely inspired our sound!

Kieran: For a band as loud and riotous as yourselves, the band name Grandma’s House feels almost out of place, how did this come to be?

Poppy: Our friend has a tattoo of her grandmas house on her arm, and when we were trying to think of a band name we were saying every possible word we could think of, and one of us just pointed to the tattoo and said GRANDMAS HOUSE! It immediately stuck, and just felt like the perfect juxtaposition with the loud shouty music we make.

Kieran: Bristol has an amazing live music scene full of great bands and artists, who are some you would recommend to our readers?

Poppy: Yes so many! Slagheap, Muffintops, Try Me are some of our absolute faves at the moment!

Kieran: Your self-titled debut EP was released into the wild on October 15th, how has the reception been and how do you feel now it’s out there?

Poppy: Oh my god it’s been amazing!!! We are so happy with the response! We’re so glad it’s out in the world as it’s been a long time coming.

Kieran: Can you talk us through the recording process of the EP?

Poppy: Yeah we had so much fun! We recorded our instruments all together in Factory studios, all in one day in a mad blur! And then we finished it off with Scott Barnett in Bath!”.

There are a couple of other interviews that I want to explore. To give you a view as to what critics were saying about Grandmas House, this is a pretty positive and considered review from DORK:

“Coated with sticky sweet danger, Bristol trio Grandmas House’s eponymous debut EP sizzles with all things wild and natural, blazing through the five-track run with elemental power. Lightning fast, three of the songs don’t even touch the two-minute mark; blink, and they’ll just be a ringing in your ears. From the high-street folklore of ‘Pasty’, to the politicised rage of ‘Golden’, the band create songs deeply rooted in the dual mundanity and extravagance of the world we live in, but framed in witchy, earthy sounds. A stand-out moment is the throaty desperation of ‘Feed Me’, which evokes something primordial in its image of the hungover woman laid bare.

The EP feeds the violent frustrations of the past few years through a needlepoint with cutting precision, stitching their songs together with turbulent guitars and incisive lyricism. Jagged and sharp, the band cut through blue skies with their oddly melodic punk explosion, teasing the riotous energy of their live shows and leaving you scouring the internet for their next slot in your nearest boozer. Pumped full of dangerous amounts of adrenaline, Grandmas House have proven themselves as ones to watch”.

It is going to be a very busy year for new music! Grandmas House are one of those groups who are primed and ready for the live circuit. It has been weird the past two years, and they have had to sort of remember how to perform live again! Mia Smith spoke with the trio following an acclaimed and sold-out show at Rough Trade back in September:

“I commend the impressive mosh pits induced by their set - ‘yeah, that was insane!’ Yasmin says, ‘from the beginning onwards as well - it usually takes a while to heat up’. The demographic of the Grandmas House crowd couldn’t be wider - from middle aged bearded rockers to a literal child holding onto the barrier. ‘We’ve got the whole range’, Yasmin laughs. Zoe is in similar disbelief: ‘I didn’t look up for the first three songs because I was trying to get in the zone, and then I looked up and was like oh my God’. It’s inspiring to see the crowd the band attracts, and Yasmin notices too: ‘there was a really good mix of genders in the mosh pit, and that’s what we like to see’. I ask if they plan on moshing to IDLES later. ‘I don’t know if I’m gonna get in the pit yet’, Zoe says. Yasmin agrees: ‘yeah, people have definitely broken bones in there. We don’t have any time to be breaking bones’.

 PHOTO CREDIT: Rosie Carne 

The band really don’t have time for injuries, always busy after moving in together in Bristol. We joke that Grandmas House is more than a band name - it’s their actual home. Poppy explains that they met at university in London, but only started making music a year later. They find that living together helps their creative process, and have been especially grateful to share a space throughout the pandemic. ‘A lot of bands were struggling, but we were just constantly together, and that was good’, Yasmin says, ‘If we have an idea we can just shout down the hall’. Zoe laughs, ‘yeah, or just message the Whatsapp group like ‘come to my room!’’. During lockdown the band tried their hand at making music videos, resulting in the delightfully homemade accompaniment to track ‘Always Happy’. ‘We had a vision and it actually worked out really well’, Yasmin explains, ‘I didn’t think it was gonna look that good but it did’. In one part of the video the trio smother their faces in clown-like paint as Yasmin sarcastically screams ‘I am always happy’. ‘We got this really cheap face paint, and it was a one take situation’, she explains proudly”.

Go and follow Grandmas House if you have not already done so. I am going to end with this interview from 365Bristol's dedicated music magazine, LOUD Bristol. They spoke with Grandmas House last year for their third edition. The band talked about the relief and joy of getting back on the road:

 “Despite releasing a slew of singles since their inception, Grandmas House have carved out a reputation as an explosive live band first and foremost, playing some of Bristol’s best-loved small venues including The Old England, Exchange and The Louisiana during their early days. “We were playing out loads at that point,” Yasmin tells me, “playing Bristol pretty much every week.” But, like so many acts emerging across the city and beyond, their progress came to a grinding halt when Covid-19 started to take hold in early 2020. Suddenly, a band who were making a name for themselves with their head-turning stage shows had no heads to turn and no stages to play on.

As it turned out, though, the trio managed to maintain some productivity and keep the ball rolling through successive lockdowns. Living together for the entirety of the pandemic, Yasmin, Poppy and Zoë spotted an opportunity to come up with ideas and focus their energy on making new music while venue doors were bolted shut.

“Going from nothing to playing all these new cities in the past few months has been amazing”

“I think we figured out a really good way of writing songs,” Poppy recalls, “because we were spending so much time together and we’re so comfortable around each other. It was never like ‘oh let’s get together and write a song’ – usually it’s like we’re one brain that comes together and makes something happen.”

IN THIS PHOTO: Grandmas House on-stage as part of the Music Venue Trust Revive Live tour/PHOTO CREDIT: Vendy Palkovicova

“One merged brain! We are just the same people – it’s actually a bit weird,” Yasmin laughs.

Whatever the dynamic, it was clearly a good fit. From March 2020 to the end of lockdown in July, Grandmas House released four standalone singles and two homemade music videos, showcasing their ability to self-produce and create on their own DIY terms. Yasmin explains they were “gigging so much before [the pandemic] that every time we practiced we’d just play the set for the next gig,” never being able to put time aside to work on a studio-quality release.

In contrast, lockdown presented the band with an opportunity to fine-tune their sound, spend more time writing and put more thought into their production. Now, they’ve released their self-titled debut EP (recorded between Bristol and Bath) and crucially, they’re back on the road. Between supporting IDLES on The Downs in September (playing in front of their biggest crowd to date), taking part in the Music Venue Trust’s Revive Live series and embarking on their first-ever nationwide headline tour, Grandmas House are right back in amongst it, and loving every second.

“I feel like we actually kind of forgot how to play live,” Poppy says. “We’d only played gigs in Bristol and one in Cardiff before lockdown, so we never got to experience the proper touring thing and playing in different places. We were a bit scared - we were like ‘oh my god what if we don’t like touring!’ – but going from nothing to playing all these new cities in the past few months has been amazing”.

This year will be a lot more fruitful and productive for Grandmas House. Having released an E.P. and a string of singles last year, they will want to capitalise on that and get the music out there to the people. Keep abreast of their social media channels to see when you can catch them live. Maybe they will pop out another E.P. before the end of 2022. I have big hopes for the Bristol-based powerhouse. They are a really wonderful band. If you want to follow and back a hot band with a big future, then I can direct you…

TO Grandmas House.

_____________

Follow Grandmas House

FEATURE: Letters and Numbers: Recognising Kate Bush’s Enormous and Ongoing Significance

FEATURE:

 

 

Letters and Numbers

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1980/PHOTO CREDIT: Patrick Lichfield 

Recognising Kate Bush’s Enormous and Ongoing Significance

___________

I am going to…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 2011

source from a couple of articles that I have used before. There are a couple of things that are notable when you think of Kate Bush today. Firstly, the sheer number of social media posts I see every day concerning her music is amazing. Although not surprising, one is stunned to realise how far and wide her music has spread! An artists who is being talked about passionately by people in their teens and twenties, she is someone who is adored by a huge demographic. Even though it is more than a decade since fresh material came from her, her body of work is endlessly being shared and extolled. The second thing that I notice is how Bush is not as prized and honoured as she should be. I have raised this before. I wrote a feature a while back where I asked when Bush would be made a Dame. Whilst some dislike honours like this and feel uncomfortable, I do not think Bush has that issue. She is a CBE, though she is more than deserving of being a Dame. In terms of music awards, she has won her fair share through the year. That said, she has not been inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. Again, there are artists who hate award shows and any sort of ceremony. Whatever form it takes, I feel the sheer size of her legacy and the popularity she has means she deserves more. We have just started 2022. I look around and can see artists covering her songs; others are definitely influenced by her. In addition to compelling new acts, she is someone who has influenced everyone from Tori Amos to Big Boi.

 Regardless of what comes from Bush in the coming years, she is someone who is as relevant now as ever. I have spoken to some people who ask whether Bush is significant now. Does visibility and prolificacy equal relevance and popularity? Look at the adoration Bush and her music received on a daily basis, and one can definitely say she is popular. The fact she is inspiring generations and touching those of all genders, races and walks of life means she is massively relevant! The same is true when it comes to the musical landscape. Not hogging the charts, being played massively on Radio 1 or appearing on the red carpet, it is the fame and modern-day view of celebrity that confuses people. Bush was never like that, nor has she ever sought fame and that sort of exposure. Regardless of whether she does get any further prizes or honours, that takes nothing away from her or the music. Having inspired a few great albums over the past few years, Bush’s influence and important today is huge. I want to start by going back to an article from COMPLEX. In 2020, Brianna Holt wrote about the widespread influence of Kate Bush. She also remarked how her lack of social media activity is refreshing and could account for her popularity:

“For the last three decades, Bush has been crowned the queen of art-pop without ever winning a Grammy or touring after the releases of new albums. You won’t catch her in the audience at an award show or giving lengthy interviews on a talk show. In fact, it isn’t even certain where she is spending her time, but many fans assume she’s tucked away somewhere in South Devon. With her pioneering legacy of experimental sound, masterful storytelling, and unconventional lyrics and structure, Bush’s influence in the music industry has stretched across genres and borders. “Kate Bush has always been a typewriter in a renaissance," Boy George explained. "She appeared out of nowhere at the tail end of punk and sort of embodied the punk spirit by just being completely herself. She blew things apart with things like ‘Running Up That Hill’ because it defied the classic logic of pop.”

If you haven’t been as lucky to come across Kate Bush’s music in a film or through the recommendation of a friend, there's a chance you’ve unknowingly grown accustomed to the sounds she pioneered. From FKA Twigs’ Magdalene to Billie Eilish’s When We All Fall Asleep, Where Do We Go?, Bush’s influence—whether direct or not—exists in so many modern pop projects today. Hints of her dramatic vocals carry on through Florence Welch’s delivery and her experimental, futuristic production provided a blueprint for artists like Charli XCX to push pop forward. Her mime-like dance moves coupled with intimate orchestration is echoed in Lorde’s performances. Sinead O’ Connor’s penetrating lyrics in “Troy” and Sia’s roaring vocals in “Chandelier” both conjure the spirit of Kate Bush. Her heirs include other greats like Tori Amos, Björk and Enya. Even electronic artists like Grimes and rock artists like Stevie Nicks have been compared to the UK artist.

Music critics often award talent to musicians who effectively create songs that are transformative and albums that generate a different vibe than the previous. In 2011, Kate Bush told Interview Magazine, “My desire was never to be famous. It was to try and create something interesting musically if I could.”

She is highly praised by her peers, too. Big-time artists like St. Vincent and Adele have publicly expressed how Bush’s music influenced their own work. Prince noted her as his favorite lady. Even Tupac was a Kate Bush fan. Big Boi, a longtime stan of “Running up That Hill,” shared that he would listen to the song everyday on his bike ride to and from school. During a phone call earlier this month he told us, “I fell in love with her songwriting and how her songs would tell stories. It was deep. From there she became one of my two favorite artists." The connection he formed to Bush's music grew so deep that he spent a week in England trying to pin her down while he was in town for press meetings.

For fans, it can be quite frustrating to admire someone who is so distant, especially in the digital age. Very little is known about Bush’s day-to-day life, and social media doesn’t provide a stance on her political views or evolving taste and perspective. It isn’t even certain when and if another Kate Bush album will ever come, leaving fans with no choice but to be patient with her timeline and dive deeper into music that already exists. Luckily, powerful art coupled with a mystifying personality has left a lot to explore since the release of her debut album in 1978. Maybe that is why Bush has continued to persist over time. After all, an artist who is not yet fully understood can often be the most compelling”.

It is true that Bush’s output and visibility in the mainstream has dwindled since the 1990s. In 1993, at a particularly stressful and hard time, there was a real need for her to take a step back. It would take until 2005 until another album arrived from her. I want to finish by quoting from a New Yorker feature from 2018.

“In “Under the Ivy,” the music journalist Graeme Thomson’s smart and respectful biography of Bush, from 2010, the author describes how, early on, reactions to Bush often condescended to her as a child of privilege. She was a doctor’s daughter from Kent, raised by an affectionate, mildly oddball family in a rambling old farmhouse (I kept thinking of the Weasleys from the Harry Potter series), where she was kindly listened to and afforded time and space in which to play the piano and write songs. It was a house full of hidden corners and secret-garden nooks, a portal to the imagination almost as good as a magic wardrobe. The family was Catholic, and Kate, the youngest of three, attended convent school; home, meanwhile, was vibrant with the Celtic singing and sayings of her Irish mother. The twin influences of mystical Irishness and Roman Catholicism bequeathed an atticful of imagery to Bush’s songwriting. Her two older brothers, John Carder and Paddy, were early creative collaborators who became lifelong ones, introducing her to prog rock and the pre-Raphaelites, and, in Paddy’s case, playing a startling array of instruments. Her mum and dad loved her songs, even the ripe ones about adolescent sexual longing. “Our father bought a good reel-to-reel tape recorder,” John Carder writes in his book “Kate,” “and we assiduously recorded all her songs, typed out the lyrics, catalogued them and then posted the tapes to ourselves in registered envelopes—the simplest way of preserving copyright.” Later, a college friend of John Carder’s got David Gilmour, the guitarist for Pink Floyd, to come listen to young Kate play at home, and Gilmour, impressed, arranged recording sessions for her at a London studio.

Thomson contends that, at a time when musical camps were more fiercely armored than they are now (remember when people had to choose, absurdly, between punk and disco?), Bush got a bad rap from some music journalists for being a dreamy middle-class girl rather than an angry working-class bloke. There was grumbling about her tweeness, her witchy, unapologetic femininity. “Most of her records,” the jazz critic Richard Cook, writing about Bush in Sounds magazine, complained, “smell of tarot cards, kitchen curtains and lavender pillows.” That said, John Lydon—a.k.a. Johnny Rotten—loved her music. In a BBC documentary about Bush, from 2014, he allows that “a lot of my friends at the time couldn’t bear” Bush’s high-pitched, passionate warbling on “Wuthering Heights” and other early songs. “They just thought it was too much”—and, indeed, Bush is the high priestess of too much. “But that,” Lydon said, “was really what drew me in.”

In the nineties, when Bush’s output slowed and her public appearances dwindled, the British tabloids seized on another archetype for her: she was a “mythical recluse,” as Thomas writes, a rock-and-roll Miss Havisham. It’s a persistently alluring reversal-of-fortune story—the celebrity, especially one who blazed early and prodigiously, fading away, vain and lonely, ideally in a mansion. (See narratives stretching from “Sunset Boulevard” to the 2017 podcast “Looking for Richard Simmons.”)

But her real story doesn’t conform all that well to the fable. She was most productive between 1978 and 1994, when she made seven albums, but in the years since, she’s put out two critically acclaimed albums of original material plus a live album and a collection of some new versions of her old songs. She’s raised a son, Albert, who’s now in his late teens, with her partner, the musician Danny McIntosh. In 2014, she put on “Before the Dawn,” a twenty-two-night residency at the Hammersmith Apollo, in London, that combined theatre, puppetry, film, and music in a spectacle that critics found occasionally ridiculous and genuinely, almost unbearably moving. Tickets for all twenty-two performances sold out within fifteen minutes online”.

Someone who is a national treasure in the U.K. and admired enormously around the world, I do think Kate Bush deserves more awards and honours. Not only has Bush amazed and influenced with her music. Through the years, she has donated to and worked with charities. During the pandemic, she has shown her support for the NHS and commended the frontline workers. That patronage is another reason why Bush should be commended. I have heard no news of any forthcoming honours, though you…

CAN never say never!

TRACK REVIEW: Suki Waterhouse - Melrose Meltdown

TRACK REVIEW:

 

 

Suki Waterhouse

Melrose Meltdown

 

 

8.7/10

 

 

The track, Melrose Meltdown, is available from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDbD_07FLuE

RELEASE DATE:

25th January, 2022

ORIGIN:

London, U.K./Los Angeles, U.S.A.

GENRES:

Baroque Pop/Dream Pop/Alt-Pop

The album, I Can’t Let Go, is available from 22nd April, 2022. Pre-order the album here:

https://www.resident-music.com/productdetails&path=168&product_id=86977

LABEL:

Sub Pop Records

TRACKLIST:

Moves

The Devil I Know

Melrose Meltdown

Put Me Through It

My Mind

Bullshit on the Internet

Wild Side

On Your Thumb

Slip

Blessed

PRODUCER:

Brad Cook

__________

I want to start out with a couple of points…

that I would not normally do for other artists. Because Suki Waterhouse is an actor and model, she comes from a different background and brings a different set of skills to music. It is not unusual for actors to also release music. Today, we have new artists like Maisie Peters who sit between the two crafts. In fact, iconic model Heidi Klum is going to release her first single soon. I think there is a slightly snobby attitude when it comes to actors and models releasing music. Maybe a sense that the purity is distilled or they are not as authentic as other musicians. In the case of Suki Waterhouse, she is a born artist. She released music years ago, yet it is now that she is really looking ahead to a longer and more prolific career. In terms of significant output, she releases her debut album, I Can’t Let Go, in April. I love her music, and I think that her acting experience and C.V. elevates and impacts the songs. She brings new disciplines and nuances into her work. In her early-thirties now, newer songs like Melrose Meltdown (which I will review soon) are not the same as her tracks from a few years back. Rather than present a diversion, I am going to start by discussing Waterhouse as an actor. Last year, she appeared in the supernatural film, Seance. Remix Magazine spoke with her about it:

“Currently based in LA filming an upcoming TV adaptation of New York Times bestseller Daisy Jones & The Six, the charismatic Brit radiates positivity. “It’s SO nice to be back at work again and finally doing stuff!” Suki responds when I ask how she’s doing right now. Refreshingly, her year has been much the same as mine, minus the blacked-out windows and constant sound of drilling echoing in her complex. “Like everyone else this past year I haven’t had much escape. I was in an apartment that had building work going on all the time. After having had blacked-out windows, I think my body is only just reactivating to seeing sunlight! I feel like I’ve been a cavewoman eating yoghurt for what feels like two years…” Again, relatable.

PHOTO CREDIT: RLJE Films 

Suki is playing new girl Camille Meadows at the prestigious Edelvine Academy for Girls in new horror mystery Seance. “A really fun, cool, go-back-to-school horror movie,” is how Suki describes it. “Not too scary that you’ll be terrified the entire time and up all night though. It’s dark but kind of funny as well. I like the way it doesn’t take itself too seriously.”

Marking a change in genre for Suki, she was drawn to the role not just for a new challenge but the nostalgia. The actress drew inspiration for the role by digging into her own school days. “I think so much of our lives as grown-ups is shaped by those years. From being the ‘outcast’ to that mission to help a friend. It was like a full-circle experience going back there, except this time around having more empathy for myself,” she recounts.

In the film, we see Camille (Suki) take part in a Seance to find out what happened to a fellow classmate after a mysterious suicide. The supernatural nature of Seance begged the question, where does Suki sit in terms of the supernatural world in real life? “I’m not super attuned to that world, although in saying that I have certain things I ‘see’ quite regularly. I experience sleep paralysis, which feels quite paranormal." Describing it as that moment before you wake up where you ‘feel trapped in your own body, like you’ve been abducted by aliens’, Suki says it’s as close as she’s got to being ‘spooked’.

Her army of two million fans on Instagram might be surprised to learn, despite fronting campaigns for the likes of Burberry, Tommy Hilfiger and Salvatore Ferragamo, Suki is first and foremost an actress. Masterfully navigating the line between screen and fashion, I asked the multitalented performer where her heart lies most. “I haven’t modelled for years,” she tells me. “I actually started acting, as well as singing, really young before I even got into modelling. Acting for me was always an outlet outside of school that was for me. I never did it in school, I was way too embarrassed. My theatre group was always my secret world.” Turns out, there’s another world that has her heart though too. “Music has been a big focus for me – I’m really excited about that. I’ve been doing it my whole life, working up to an album that’s coming out soon.” … "Stay tuned," she teases”.

Keep an eye out for future Waterhouse acting projects. She is appearing in Daisy Jones & The Six soon (it is an adaptation of the 2019 novel from Taylor Jenkins Reid). Waterhouse is hugely multi-talented. Whether she is going to base herself out of L.A. or London, I think that her music will take on a bigger significance very soon. With a debut album forthcoming, many new listeners will discover her incredible music. Prior to coming more up to date regarding her interviews and exposure, there is a piece from a few years back where we get to know a then-twenty-seven-year-old emerging and coming through. Like so many new artists who were putting out work in 2019 and 2020, the pandemic has delayed things. Waterhouse was building momentum in 2019. Things have taken a bit of a weird course since then. What strikes me about Suki Waterhouse is her creativity and how much passion she has. A multidisciplinary talent, here is someone who turning heads and standing out:

“The allure that 27-year-old Suki Waterhouse radiates is undeniable no matter what platform she is seen on–and she has pretty much all of them covered. The English model was discovered at age 16 and since then has posed for designers such as Tommy Hilfiger, Alice + Olivia, and Burberry. Waterhouse’s modeling career led her to her own photography exhibition at Eb and Flow gallery in London, followed by the launch of her accessories brand Pop & Suki, which she co-founded with longtime friend Poppy Jamie, and helped grow her 1.5 million Instagram following, too. With her cool charisma and bold ambition, Waterhouse successfully made her foray into acting in 2016, earning roles in films such as The Divergent Series: Insurgent, Assassination Nation, and Detective Pikachu.

The creative stamina that Waterhouse possesses is clear from her never-ending and ever-growing list of projects that stretch across industries. “Once I finish something I’m quite like, okay, what else do I have on the list?,” Waterhouse tells me. The multi-hyphenate talent ventured into music in 2016 and has been self-releasing singles every so often since then. “There’s a very immediate reaction when you put out music. But, music is also something that people keep discovering, so it kind of has a really long life,” the singer says.

PHOTO CREDIT: reformation 

Waterhouse released her single “Johanna” in late 2019 with an accompanying music video starring legendary New York City performance artist Amanda Lepore. “I was more nervous with her than probably I would be with anyone else. I used to go and watch her a lot when I first went to New York when I was 17. She’s so larger than life and made a big impact on me,” Waterhouse says of working with Lepore. The video casts Waterhouse as a male bodyguard and Lepore as a glamorous Hollywood darling.

While Waterhouse croons about unrequited love on the song, her portrayal of Fred the bodyguard in the video is a reflection of some of her own internal struggles and insecurities. “I was thinking about how I was going to present myself and I kind of wanted to not look like myself. Maybe because I was nervous,” she says of her role in the music video. Waterhouse dons a dark men’s suit and glasses in the video, a bold contrast to her on-screen counterpart but not totally far from Waterhouse’s actual personal style.

“I sort of wanted to hide behind a suit that feels very authoritative. I think a lot about wearing suits and men’s clothes. I’m either dressed like a cupcake or in suits and boy’s clothes a lot,” she offers. Waterhouse adds that she finds it interesting that in today’s society, a suit is the expected uniform for most bankers and “greedy men” but there is an androgynous and authoritative connotation when she wears a suit.

“It’s like such a basic bitch outfit so why do we associate it with being powerful and strong?,” she asks herself. Waterhouse celebrates both her femininity and masculinity in her fashion choices, but admits that both styles have limitations and a certain level of power to them”.

To confirm how strong Waterhouse is as an artist, she signed to Sub Pop recently. I find that Waterhouse brings a bit of film and acting to her music. When NME spoke with her back in October, they highlighted her Thelma & Louise-inspired song, Moves:

“Suki Waterhouse has signed to Sub Pop and shared her first two songs under the label with ‘Moves’ and ‘My Mind’. Listen to them below, and check out NME’s interview with the British actor and musician.

Waterhouse has been releasing her own music since 2016, when she put out her debut single ‘Brutally’. Over the last five years, she’s shared a further four tracks that marry ‘60s girl group influences with dreamy, melancholy-tinged pop, each showcasing a knack for writing evocative lyrics and songs that linger with you long after they’re over.

“I’ve always been comfortable making music and playing it and even having the life of a musician, but I’ve always been so scared of actually putting out records,” she told NME over Zoom from Los Angeles last week. “The ones I’ve done before it’s been one song a year and I’ve really been trying to push myself to do that.”

Although it’s been a long time coming, Waterhouse’s debut album will finally arrive next year via the legendary Sub Pop. “It really was a surprise,” the musician explained of inking the deal. “I made the album by myself and then was sending it to some labels. I sent it to Sub Pop and didn’t get a response for months, and then nudged them again.” When the label’s team listened to the record, they came on board and snapped up the album.

‘Moves’, the first fruits of her relationship with the historic imprint, shows why. It is a timeless piece of pop that beautifully straddles romanticism and sadness, Waterhouse’s voice a gorgeous anchor as she shares small details from her life.

“That song is like a collection of diary entries put into one idea from over 10 years,” she explained. “Years ago, someone said to me that I looked like Suzi Quatro when I was out one night. I remember I didn’t know who she was at first, but I was like, ‘I think that’s a cool thing, I’m gonna try and keep being like this person’ and then going home and looking her up and hearing the Chris Norman version of her and him doing ‘Stumbling In’ and going down a total Suzi love hole.”

‘Moves’ was also inspired by feminist film classic Thelma & Louise, with Waterhouse imagining “the kind of song they’d be listening to when they drove off the cliff”. “‘Moves’ came from a place of strength, but also feeling a sense of abandon,” she added. “I was listening to a lot of Shangri-Las at the time and ‘60s girl band songs, which had a seduction to them but also a [sense of a] last chance and something desperate. My songwriting all comes from my places of helplessness, even if there’s a powerfulness [to it]”.

A few days ago, Atwood Magazine spotlighted a vulnerable, beautiful, stirring and highly promising young artist who was taking her next steps. Maybe there are similarities with Lana Del Rey or Jazz legends of the past regarding her vocal. Something of the cigarette-lit, smoky, romantic and vintage vision comes from her lungs - like you are in the 1950s or 1960s and walking alongside a hypnotic and hugely heart-stopping singer. I will come to an interview where Waterhouse discusses her influences soon:

“While she’s been content with a slow-burning music career, releasing one single per year since 2016’s “Brutally”, 2022 marks the year where Waterhouse is finally letting us into the musical universe she’s been creating since the age of 13. “I’m the same person that was looking out the window of the house that I grew up in and writing the same version of love songs that I was writing all the way back then”, says Waterhouse, about the confessional and romantic songwriting that’s been helping her navigate life, love, and the pressures of a public identity, among other things.

Waterhouse sings as if she’s pouring her heart out to a dimly lit bar, clouded by cigarette smoke, so entranced by the music that she doesn’t care if anyone is watching her. There’s a folky quality to her sound and the intimacy of her lyrics that hypotizes anyone who listens. She’s been chronicling all these years through music, each song a different chapter of the diary of her life, and now she’s ready to let us in.

“Moves” and “My Mind“, both singles off her album, find the balance between being certain about taking a step towards vulnerability and love and feeling like you’re losing grip of your sanity. “Moves” is bold and a classic, injected with the energy that only someone who is determined to give love a chance has, while “My Mind” is introspection at its best. Waterhouse’s latest single, “Melrose Meltdown” (a song that’s infamous among her friend group), is as gripping as a love story with a tragic ending. Cinematic and remarkable, “Melrose Meltdown” could easily soundtrack the climax of a movie about star-crossed lovers and ill-fated endings. I Can’t Let Go, Waterhouse’s debut album, is set for release April 22nd, 2022 via Sub Pop, and promises to let us in on the other chapters of her story”.

Sticking with that same interview, Atwood Magazine asked her what it was like having a music career when her name was also known. As her output has been slightly patchy in terms of prolificacy, now she is at a stage when things are starting to take off. A unique artist who is going to strike big in 2022, this year seems like an awakening for Suki Waterhouse:

“AS AN ALREADY PUBLIC PERSON, BUT ESPECIALLY SOMEONE WHO’S EITHER MODELLING OR ACTING, TO FINALLY EXPRESS YOURSELF TO PEOPLE AND HAVE PEOPLE BE REINTRODUCED TO YOU IN THIS PROCESS, SO WHO IS THE SUKI WATERHOUSE THAT PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET TO KNOW THROUGH YOUR MUSIC?

Suki Waterhouse:I was thinking about this the other day, so I never have actually been very good at, you know, the kind of “using your voice” or taking to Instagram and telling everyone every detail of why something’s wrong about the way you’ve been perceived, or like the exact details. I find it really difficult. I want people to know, how things felt, and I want you to be able to know how things feel. The details I don’t think matter as much as the feeling. And then I love that thing that you get to share with people where it’s like people know how something felt, and they get it, sharing a feeling more than the detail filling in. I made the album for girls, women who have fallen in love many times and lusted a lot, and maybe have also been a bit of a heartbreaker as well. That’s how I can sum it up.

 YOU TALKED ABOUT THE FEELING A LOT AND THERE IS SUCH A UNIVERSALITY TO THE THINGS YOU SAY IN YOUR MUSIC, BUT IT ALSO COMES ACROSS AS VERY SPECIFIC TO SITUATIONS, LIKE “I’M GOING TO PUT SOME MOVES ON YOU”, THAT IS SOMETHING EVERYBODY HAS FELT SOME TIME IN THEIR LIFE. IT CAN FEEL VERY SPECIFIC TO YOU IN YOUR SITUATION BECAUSE IT FEELS VERY GENUINE WHEN YOU'RE SINGING, BUT IT ALSO AUTOMATICALLY IS APPLICABLE TO THE LISTENERS LIFE AND THAT CREATES SUCH A DEEP BOND WITH THE MUSIC. THERE IS SOMETHING SO BEAUTIFUL ABOUT JUST SINGING ABOUT LOVE AND YOU KNOW, POURING IT INTO SONG.

Suki Waterhouse: When I wrote “Moves” I was kind of in this place where I had been heartbroken quite a few times before and it was sort of about, when you’ve been heartbroken a couple of times, actually the risk of going for somebody and saying ‘I’m actually going to put myself out there and and invest in this and want this and fully go for it’ becomes way more way more risky. There’s a small chance that you might have the reward but there’s also a way bigger chance that you might jump off the cliff and like break all your bones and like fall on your face. So that did have that kind of naivety to where it’s like ‘Oh, I haven’t done this in a long time and I’m kind of ready’ because falling in love a lot is very tiring. You get exhausted by it at some point. That was the gearing up to go for it again.

BEING ABLE TO WRITE AND EXPRESS YOURSELF, AND HAVE THAT MUSIC CAREER START QUIETLY AND SLOWLY, WHEN YOU HAD THIS WHIPLASH OF PUBLIC ATTENTION AND WERE NAVIGATING A CONSTRUCTION OF IDENTITY THAT BECOMES PUBLIC AS WELL, AND FINDING OUT HOW TO SAVE YOURSELF AND YOUR ESSENCE IN THE MIDDLE OF IT. I CAN IMAGINE IT’S JUST INSANE. HOW DID MUSIC HELP YOU GO THROUGH IT?

Suki Waterhouse: I really think it saved me in so many ways, because it’s like making a statue of exactly how you were and how you felt in that time. And it’s memorialising it, and I can listen to the first song that, in that moment, when I was my worst at about 23, I wrote “Brutally” and I was sobbing the whole time while I wrote it. I always had that need to write it down. And I think that, at the end of the day, I’m like, no matter how hard the times that you’re in might be, I always had the inclination to document it. That kind of confessional journaling, just to keep all of it down. And I would take a lot of photos as well of little things everywhere. I have so many photos, just to remind yourself of objects and everything, that always felt incredibly important. So it wasn’t knowing that I was wanting to start a music career or anything. It just felt very important to remember because I didn’t feel like I could like share exactly what where I was with anyone else. So it kind of it was making myself feel alive and remembering what had happened. I think as long as you write it down and make it into something, then who the fuck cares? That’s always more important to me, as long as you’ve made something from whatever you are going through that’s the best.

I READ THAT YOU MADE THE ALBUM AND AFTER IT WAS DONE YOU STARTED SENDING IT TO LABELS. SO YOU HAD FULL CREATIVE LIBERTY AND FREEDOM, IT WAS YOUR OWN PROCESS WITH YOUR PRODUCER. HOW DO YOU THINK THAT HAVING THIS MUCH FREEDOM AND NOT HAVING ANY EXPECTATION ON YOU HELPED YOU MAKE THE ALBUM?

Suki Waterhouse: That was the great thing. So I had  this own thing on my heart weighing really heavy like ‘I have to do this’, but also it was really nice for me just self-releasing, you know, one song every now and then and watching people react to that. Especially “Brutally”, I think that was a big deal for me because I put that song out and it just encouraged me very much to keep going. But the great thing about all of this songwriting, I never had a label being like, ‘hey, like better get this in by this day’. No, whatsoever. You’re never totally ready, but you just get to a point where you’re like, ‘I’m as ready as I can be’.

 It’s funny the way stuff happens. It was more to do with the producer, Brad Cook, who I absolutely like love, like some of the records he’s done with Hiss Golden Messenger and Waxahatchee. I was like, I think that is who it would be. Because before then I didn’t actually know who would be the person to take like the recordings and make them into something that we could do together that would be a cohesive sound. I knew about him. And then my friend Dave Sitek from TV on the Radio, who I’ve written with before, he knew him too. So I managed to send the demos to him and he had two weeks and said, ‘If you can come to North Carolina, then we can do it’. And that is quite a strange thing, in a way, because usually you meet the person and know what they’re going to be like, and you’ve worked with him loads and I had never met him at all. But I called him and he’s like, ‘Well, what are you listening to right now?’ And I said, Lucinda Williams “Fruits of my Labour”, which is like the only song pretty much that I’ve listened to for like years, like every day. And he’s like, ‘Well, that’s my favorite song’.

I just knew, in a funny way, that everything would be okay, but very much just being like, this is something that needed to come out of me, it’s not had any outside force telling me to do it. I didn’t expect to find a label. I was just at the point where I wanted to self-release it. And then I started sending it to labels just to see what would happen. And, I mean, Sub Pop, I would never have fucking thought that they would want to do it”.

There is a lot of excitement and anticipation regarding the new album from Waterhouse. It is going to be one of those L.P.s you will want to own on vinyl (I have put a link where you can pre-order at the top). Coming back to that NME interview that I sourced, she talked about working with producer Brad Cook (who has produced records for the likes of Bon Iver and Waxahatchee):

“Waterhouse flew to North Carolina to start recording with him, with original plans to make her album in a “really old, beautiful church”. “And then someone came in and said, ‘We’ve booked this’ so we had to pack up and move,” she said. “We ended up making the record in a bridesmaid’s makeup room in a wedding hall. Where I sat listening to everything and singing all the vocals was literally a bridesmaid’s dressing room with a pillow that said ‘Live, Laugh, Love’.”

Making an album was something Waterhouse had been wanting “for so long” and reasoned she had pushed herself now, at 29, because she “had all these things I’ve never spoken about that I felt like I had to tie up before I go into my thirties”.

“[Music] is the only way that I really know how to express certain things, so it definitely felt like, ‘I’ve got to get this format’.”

With an album ready to go, the musician can now turn her attention to performing live. She made her first festival appearance at BottleRock Napa in California last month, having “barely done a show” at all before. “I definitely had that feeling where it feels like your teeth are going to be sick,” she said. “But as soon as I walked on, I was really happy to be there and just really comfortable”.

Although some have noticed a possible dig at Bradley Cooper in the opening verse of Melrose Meltdown - Waterhouse herself would probably not shy from this take -, I am not going to interpret it that way! The lyrics are so evocative, poetic and stirring: “Deep horrible blues/Watching you work the room/There's a frequency of trouble/In the car to Malibu/I'll be crying on your milk-white sheets/Hoping one day we're married/In a house you'll build around me”. I detected elements of modern artists like Lana Del Rey, but also of legends like Etta James and Julie London. As someone who grew up in the 1990s and ‘00s, perhaps one might expect Suki Waterhouse to have a different set of influences. Many artists of her age are taking a different musical course. That said, I Can’t Let Go is an album that will explore different genres and musical time periods. Before that first verse arrives, there is a brief rush and drenched beauty of strings. Rather than extend the introduction, Waterhouse’s vocals come in. There is an urgency to them, yet they are caramel and honeyed. Gorgeous and tender, there is also this womanly soulfulness from a strong and dignified soul. Trying to keep straight and her tears away, one can detect emotion and some sense of resignation from her profession and revelation. With some slight electronic stab and injection, we get the strings brooding and slightly haunting. The first couple of lines to the pre-chorus, in a way, seems to nod to the style and musical influence of Melrose Meltdown: “I guess I believe/I believe in old-fashioned things/Imagining us/But the longer I stay, I can see you/What's happening? What's happening?”. The video (directed by Sofia Malamute) sees our heroine in a pink gown with long gloves on a sparse set. Strangely captivating in its simplicity, it adds new dimensions to the lyrics. This sense of a hazy dream or an emotional hit.

The chorus provides the biggest punch and swell. Although most of Suki Waterhouse’s romantic experiences and life memories would have happened in the U.K., it is clear that California’s Melrose Avenue is inspirational and key. Maybe nodding to a relationship Waterhouse is trying to exorcise and project or a more fictionalised investigation of romance and loss in the West Coast sun, the chorus does definitely get under the skin: “Welcome to my Melrose meltdown/Nobody ever breaks up, we just break down/We really fucked it up in diamonds and drugstores/That's what we came for/And when you get it, you got what you need”. The lyrics are almost film-like. I alluded to the fact that Waterhouse’s experience in acting goes into the music. She has this cinematic and widescreen approach that makes her lines so much bigger and more moving. I wonder whether there was a more literal concept for the music video, where we see Waterhouse driving through Melrose, or looking lonely and thoughtful or a balcony as she looks out into the night. Waterhouse’s voice is breathy and alluring.

PHOTO CREDIT: Sofia Malamute

There are definite nods to a certain Lizzy Grant (which is definitely no bad thing!), although Waterhouse very much brings her own experiences and cadences to the vocal. She is also influenced by and channels elements of Sharon Van Etten, Valerie June, Garbage, Frazey Ford, Lou Doillon, and Lucinda Williams. There are scent notes of regret and longing, together with anger, reflectiveness and dreaminess. Stirring all this together, we get a rich vocal performance that beautifully pairs with the stirring strings. The composition almost acts like a film score, as Waterhouse narrates her lines The turn of phrase and wording is brilliant: “Handing out gold stars for tailor-made behaviour/I can see your demons shining like prizes/I'm sat out on the balcony/Too sad to go to the party/It's a crime loving you so, it's a crime letting you go”. The structure of the song is also excellent. We then get a pre-chorus, the chorus again, the bridge and one final chorus. The bridge seems to suggest that her former sweetheart - whomever he happens to be - has taken quite a lot out of her Maybe there is a degree of defeat: “Got what you need/When you hang up and say, "I'll see you later"/Got what you need/Write it down, California paper/Got what you need/Forevermore, my anti-hero/For loving and letting me go down, down”.  We do get a bit of Waterhouse being driven, as the camera focuses on her swaying back and forth in the back of what seems like a truck. Waterhouse repeats the chorus line, “We just break down”;  the madness and torment that has arisen from a challenging experience. A fantastic song from the upcoming album, I Can’t Let Go, make sure that you watch out for the amazing Suki Waterhouse.

I Can’t Let Go is shaping up to be an album that everyone will need to own. Before rounding off, this is what we can expect from an L.P. that is from the heart and soul of the amazing Suki Waterhouse. Make sure you pre-order your copy:

“Nowadays, voice memos, videos, and pictures chronicle our lives in real-time. We trace where we’ve been and reveal where we’re going. However, Suki Waterhouse catalogs the most intimate, formative, and significant moments of her life through songs. You might recognize her name or her work as singer, songwriter, actress but you’ll really get to know the multi-faceted artist through her music. Memories of unrequited love, fits of longing, instances of anxiety, and unfiltered snapshots interlock like puzzle pieces into a mosaic of well-worn country, nineties-style alternative, and unassuming pop. She writes the kind of tunes meant to be grafted onto dusty old vinyl from your favorite vintage record store, yet perfect for a sun-soaked festival stage. These compositions comprise her upcoming 2022 full-length debut album, I Can’t Let Go [Sub Pop Records].

“The album is called I Can’t Let Go, because for years it felt like I was wearing heavy moments on my sleeve and it just didn’t make sense to do so anymore. There’s so much that I’ve never spoken about. Writing music has always been where it felt safe to do so. Every song for the record was a necessity. In many ways, I’ve been observing my life as an outsider—even when I’ve been on the inside. It’s like I was a visitor watching things happen.’

Growing up in London, Suki gravitated towards music’s magnetic pull. She listened to the likes of Alanis Morissette and Fiona Apple. Meanwhile, Oasis held a particularly special place in her heart. She initially teased out this facet of her creativity with a series of singles, generating nearly 20 million total streams independently. Nylon hailed her debut “Brutally” as “what a Lana Del Rey deep cut mixed with Joni Mitchell’s ‘Both Sides, Now’ would sound like.” In addition to raves from Garage, Vice and Lemonade Magazine, DUJOR put it best, “Suki Waterhouse’s music has swagger.” Constantly consuming artists of all stripes, she listened to the likes of Sharon Van Etten, Valerie June, Garbage, Frazey Ford, Lou Doillon, and Lucinda Williams. In late 2020, she finally dove into making what would become I Can’t Let Go. Falling in love with Hiss Golden Messenger’s Terms of Surrender, she reached out to its producer Brad Cook [Bon Iver,War On Drugs, Snail Mail, Waxahatchee].

“I’ve been dreaming up this record for years,” she recalls. The weeks I spent in North Carolina with Brad were by far the best of my life.’

The first single “Moves” illuminates the nuances of her sound. Guitar echoes through soft piano and a veil of reverb. The momentum builds, and she warns, “I might put some goddamn moves on you, babe I know you need it.”

 “Moves’ is a song I first started writing one night on the couch, picking up the guitar and seeing what came out,” she explains. “It was a moment where I felt the urge to both sever a previous bond, while putting my faith back in trying a different path. I often think, ‘what happens when you are struck by someone who changes the course of your entire life?’ The song speculates on that journey, one that moves beyond lust and physical longing, where you know that you now have something to give.”

The companion single “My Mind” pairs breathy vocals with an airy riff paced like a tumbleweed as her angelic hum takes hold.

Next up is “Devil I Know.” A sparse beat trudges in tribal-style rhythm, while she leans into the cataclysmic chorus, “Back in hell at least I’m comfortable, need your body when my fire’s gone.”

There is also “‘Melrose Meltdown,” which Suki describes as “A shattering of illusion, undoing from a cage I'd been kept myself in where I'd thought was safe. It’s a sweeter send off, but there is an anger there when I sing it’.

I Can’t Let Go culminates on “Blessed.” Her voice ebbs in and out of the cracks between lightly strummed guitar and delicate synths as she exhales, “I could be something.”

“‘Blessed’ was right at the end,” she goes on. “It’s a song about the delicacy of family, a reflection on the moments that tested the fabric of it, when supposed light contains shadows. Ultimately, you’re cherishing the mistakes.”

In the end, Suki not only catalogs her life up to this point in the album, but she also fulfills a lifelong ambition.

“When I’ve been stuck or feel out of touch with a sense of inner meaning and outer purpose, I’ve found both through searching my memories and finding those events buried in the shadowy areas of the psyche where they were ignored,” she leaves off. “So many times of change in my life have required return visits—especially at the transitions through to the next stages. The album is an exploration of those moments when there is nothing left to lose. What is left and can’t be thrown away is the self”.

A tremendous artist who will release more albums in the future, I Can’t Let Go is an album that I am looking ahead to. With stunning songs like Melrose Meltdown showing what a talent Suki Waterhouse is, there will be a lot of positive reviews. Producing music that is so soulful, heartfelt and memorable, Waterhouse is clearly an…

INCREDIBLE talent.

___________

Follow Suki Waterhouse

FEATURE: Groovelines: Kris Kross – Jump

FEATURE:

 

 

Groovelines

Kris Kross – Jump

___________

ON 6th February…

one of the biggest songs of the 1990s turns thirty. Jump is the hit debut single by American Hip-Hop duo Kris Kross. It was a single from their debut studio album, Totally Krossed Out. Whereas some see the song as a bit of a novelty, I feel it is actually a terrific song that should be focused on more. Infectious and uplifting, it is no surprise that music buyers around the world helped make it a success! Even though Kris Kross could not follow the success of their debut single, one can definitely look fondly at the tremendous Jump. Stereogum looked at the song earlier in the month. In a very extensive feature, I wanted to highlight a few sections:

“But Kris Kross also made straight-up rap music. In terms of age and geography and subject matter, Kris Kross were outliers within rap music, but they still made music that could sit comfortably next to Public Enemy or EPMD in a DJ set. “Jump,” Kris Kross’ debut single and only #1 hit was, in its time, the most credible version of rap music that had ever made its way to the top of the Billboard Hot 100. In its time and for many years afterwards, “Jump” was also the biggest rap hit of all time.

“Jump” is a ridiculously catchy and memorable song, and that definitely helped it hit the way that it did. But the real difference-maker for “Jump” was probably timing. “Jump” was targeted directly at the kids in my micro-generation, the ones who had never known a pre-rap world. The two members of Kris Kross, Chris “Mac Daddy” Kelly and Chris “Daddy Mac” Smith, were parts of that exact same micro-generation. (I was born in September of 1979, the same month that “Rapper’s Delight,” the first rap song to reach the Hot 100, came out; both members of Kris Kross were about a year older than me.) If you were a little kid when “Jump” came out, then these two guys immediately seemed like the coolest human beings in existence.

While both members of Kris Kross were kids, they weren’t really that much younger than the guy who discovered and assembled the duo. Jermaine Dupri grew up fully immersed in the R&B industry. Michael Mauldin, Dupri’s father, was a road manager for funk acts like Cameo and the SOS Band. In the early ’80s, a very young Dupri jumped onstage to dance with Diana Ross at an Atlanta show that his father booked. As a kid, Dupri found work as a dancer, touring with Cameo, Herbie Hancock, and early rap groups like Whodini and Run-DMC. Dupri was the little kid pop-locking in Whodini’s 1985 “Freaks Come Out At Night” video.

Chris Kelly and Chris Smith, both from Atlanta, had been friends since first grade. That day at Greenbriar Mall, the two of them were shopping for sneakers, and they walked up to Silk Tymes Leather to ask for autographs. Dupri, who wasn’t too much older than those two kids, saw a whole lot of charisma in them. In Fred Bronson’s Billboard Book Of Number 1 Hits, Dupri remembers the meeting: “They were real fresh. I thought they were some teen stars I wasn’t hip to. So I said, ‘Who are you? What do y’all do?’ They said, ‘No, we ain’t no group.’ Everybody else in the mall was looking at them the same way. People were paying attention.” Right away, Dupri decided that these two little kids should be a group and that he should turn them into one.

 The two Chrises didn’t write their lyrics. Jermaine Dupri wrote and produced everything on Totally Krossed Out, the Kris Kross album that came out in March of 1992. Dupri had been to a concert and noticed that “people were just into jumping.” In the Bronson book, Dupri says that he wrote “Jump” in an hour, though he probably spent a whole lot longer putting together the beat. Like most other rap hits of that early-’90s moment, “Jump” is a stitched-together collection of samples, and in an age where all those samples have to be cleared, it would probably be prohibitively expensive to release. The main instrumental hook of “Jump” is a needling, wobbling synth-loop that’s taken from “Funky Worm,” the 1973 funk workout from former Number Ones artists Ohio Players. (“Funky Worm” peaked at #15. Before “Jump,” “Funky Worm” samples had already appeared on a couple of N.W.A tracks.)

The “Jump” single came out in February of 1992, almost two months before the Totally Krossed Out album. It took a couple of months for “Jump” to gather steam, but after Kris Kross performed the song on an early-April episode of In Living Color, the song suddenly soared up the chart, leaping from #61 to #12 in a single week. (Kris Kross probably would’ve been prime targets for In Living Color mockery if they hadn’t actually been on the show; whoever got them booked was very smart.)”.

I was keen to mark thirty years of a ‘90s classic. Maybe you can call Kris Kross a one-hit wonder. Jump definitely captured a mood and resonated with the public. If all critics were not on board, there were plenty who reacted positively to the song. This Wikipedia article combines some critical feedback:

“Steve Huey from AllMusic called the song "irresistible", adding, "actually, the miggeda-miggeda-mack bit proves they're not bad rappers". Larry Flick from Billboard wrote that "energetic pop/hip-hopper showcases fast-talking, baby-voiced male rappers that may initially draw comparisons to Another Bad Creation." He also described the song as "radio-friendly" and "melodic". Randy Clark and Bryan DeVaney from Cashbox commented, "For such young guys, they deliver some pretty impressive lyrics and have a slammin' music track on their debut single. You can be sure to hear more from this group in the near future." James Bernard from Entertainment Weekly noted, "Play the group’s hyperactive platinum single ”Jump” at any party and watch the floors quake. To their credit, the two rappers don’t rely on their production team’s musical prowess. Smith (who calls himself Daddy Mack) and Kelly (Mack Daddy) grip their microphones with so much confidence that if they didn’t sound so youthful, you might forget they’re just barely out of grade school." Dave Sholin from the Gavin Report stated, "These two twelve year-olds from Atlanta are about to bounce in only one direction—to the top of the chart." Bruce Britt from Los Angeles Daily News described the song as "bubble gum rap".

Pan-European magazine Music & Media commented that "these 12-year-old boys have formed a real rap posse. They sound as determined as Michael Jackson at that age." Alan Jones from Music Week stated that "against an unusually fresh and eclectic backdrop, the two 13-year-old rappers make a highly infectious noise incorporating some ragga influences". James Hamilton from the magazine's RM Dance Update deemed it a "jaunty "jump, jump" prodded jiggly lurcher". A reviewer from People Magazine said that "their best trick is inserting catchily melodic refrains in the middle of their free-stylin' raps. That should help them kross over to pop. And cheek the speed at which they spin out their ragamuffin rhymes on "Jump" and "Warm It Up". Obviously the tongue matures before the rest of the body.” Hannah Ford from Select wrote that the song "is a beautiful hip hop track that gets your goose bumps quacking. It's Public Enemy's wailing sax break with Naughty By Nature's b-line." Bunny Sawyer from Smash Hits gave it five out of five, commenting, "Their tune's a work of hip-hop genius that comes complete with easy-peasy dance steps to make us all look as cross as them." Sunday Tribune described it as a "infectious rallying cry”.

It is a shame that we did not hear more songs from Kris Kross that equalled the stature and catchiness of Jump. In any case, they could be proud of a song that was a huge chart-topper. Even to this day, Jump is ranked alongside the best tracks of the 1990s. That is no small feat! As its thirtieth anniversary is on 6th February, I would suggest people put the song on and…

PLAY it loud.

FEATURE: Paul McCartney at Eighty: Two: Heart of the Country: What Paul and Linda McCartney’s 1971 Album, Ram, Means to Me

FEATURE:

 

 

Paul McCartney at Eighty

Two: Heart of the Country: The Brilliance of Paul and Linda McCartney’s 1971 Masterpiece, Ram

___________

IN the second of forty features…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Paul and Linda McCartney in 1970/PHOTO CREDIT: Paul McCartney

that will come in the build to Paul McCartney’s eightieth birthday on 18th June, I am concentrating on my favourite non-Beatles/Wings album of his. In future pieces, I am going into depth a lot about his role in The Beatles, in addition to his work with Wings. I am also keen to explore subjects away from music – including his vegetarianism and activism – to give a full tribute and salute to the world’s greatest-living songwriter. Before diving into The Beatles, I will write a bit about the Paul and Linda McCartney gem from 1971. Maybe it comes as little surprise that my favourite non-Beatles/Wings album is Ram. The only album credited to Paul and Linda McCartney, I wanted to single this out. Whilst I am going to do more general features about his solo work, I am going to spotlight my favourite Wings album soon. Today, I wanted to come back to Ram. Celebrating its fiftieth anniversary last year, I am going to draw in a couple of articles and reviews to give you more information about an album that was not shown huge kindness when it first came out. After his 1970 McCartney album was slated by many, Ram found plenty willing to throw salt in the wounds and kick McCartney. Given the tension and stress that still existed after the break-up of The Beatles, I think Ram is one of Paul McCartney’s most difficult albums to listen to.

It was clear that McCartney needed to get out of the U.K. With his family, he flew to New York City in October 1970 to begin work on Ram. While the previous album had featured him playing every instrument, now, McCartney decided to hold auditions for musicians. Maybe McCartney was trying to get away from some tension in Britain, but enough time had passed where he wanted to collaborate with other musicians. One reason why Paul and Linda McCartney’s album is so special to me is because this seemed like the former Beatle starting to regain strength and inspiration, despite continued media glare. McCartney definitely would still have felt the aftershocks of not being in The Beatles. Even though Linda does not contribute a huge amount, I think their bond and her influence on him is very clear. She was a rock to him, and one can hear Paul’s affection for his wife on the album. Even though McCartney has released some tremendous solo albums – which I shall rank at a later date -, I do think Ram is the best ‘non-Beatles/Wings’ effort. I do not think there is a weak moment on the album. Ram contains some of McCartney’s best tracks. Linda’s songwriting is excellent features prominently! Beginning with the charged Too Many People and ending with the finest track, The Back Seat of My Car, this is an album that I can listen to over and over again.!

I can understand that some blamed McCartney for the end of The Beatles. There was this anger directed at him. A lot of the spite and poison that was contained in reviews is shocking! Retrospective assessment has been far kinder. Now, Ram is considered among Paul McCartney’s best albums. Not as raw and stripped-back as McCartney or McCartney II (1980), there is an honesty and earthliness to Ram that makes it such a fantastic listen. It is a nuanced album as well. I have found new respect for songs that, before, I liked but did not listen to a lot. Prior to coming to a retrospective review and offering some final thoughts, last year saw Ringer produce a feature around the legacy of Ram at fifty. I find it interesting learning what the recording sessions were like. Ringer spoke with drummer Denny Seiwell about his experiences of working with Paul, Linda and the other musicians:

“As Paul also said, “I think the songs—some of them, anyway—reflected our lifestyle at the time.” It’s a record that evokes a time, place, and mood, like Exile on Main Street with a Scottish farm subbing in for a French villa and hugs instead of hard drugs. That connection comes through not just in the pastoral stylings of “Heart of the Country” and “3 Legs” or the loved-up domestic bliss of “Ram On,” “Eat at Home,” and “Long Haired Lady,” but also in the sound. Paul asked Linda to contribute to the album and be in the band he was planning to form, despite her lack of training. She received songwriting credits on six of Ram’s 12 songs, and her homespun harmonies made the album a family affair that sounded different from the Beatles. A more practiced vocalist might have sung certain “Long Haired Lady” lines more smoothly and sweetly than Linda did, but a more typical intonation also might have made it less fun to sing along.

Recording with his wife was one way to ensure that his new bandmates wouldn’t all turn on him the way the old ones did. It was also in keeping with McCartney’s lo-fi approach to his first album (as well as Wild Life, his first one with Wings). McCartney could have assembled a supergroup to record Ram, like Lennon’s “Dirty Mac” lineup at the Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus, but as he said in 2001, “I was looking for a new band rather than the Blind Faith thing.” After a decade of Beatlemania and internal tension, secret auditions and no-name sidemen seemed like low-pressure, lasting solutions to the problems that had plagued the Fab Four.

Although Seiwell and the other new recruits weren’t headliners, they had some serious chops, which they needed to master some of the album’s demanding musical moments. “Ram was not that easy of a record to really pull off,” Seiwell says, adding, “A lot of the material on Ram was really complicated. To do a song like ‘Uncle Albert’ in one day, in one pass—we did not do ‘Uncle Albert,’ and then stop the machine, and start it for ‘Admiral Halsey.’ That was one song, and that’s the way it was recorded.” Other passages presented similar challenges, particularly the layered vocals of “Dear Boy” and the creative arrangements of multi-part teen ballad “The Back Seat of My Car,” a song McCartney had demoed during the sessions for Let It Be. (“Oh my God, talk about complicated songs,” Seiwell says about “Back Seat.”) “And there wasn’t a lot of editing, if any,” he continues, adding, “That record was not done to a click track. It was pure. It was really an organic recording.” Most tracks required only three to five attempts to get an album-quality take.

What McCartney found was an effortless-sounding synthesis of his influences and strengths. Ram boasted the Beach Boys–style symphonies and harmonies of “Dear Boy” and “Back Seat”; the Buddy Holly bop of “Eat at Home”; the Lennon-esque absurdity and doggerel of “Monkberry Moon Delight.” Yet it’s less an homage to anyone else than a sampler of McCartney’s musical selves, from the anti-political preaching against preaching in album opener “Too Many People”—a potshot aimed at the outspoken Lennon, who would soon return fire—to the whimsical song suite of “Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey,” the winking raunchiness of “Eat at Home,” the rustic scatting of “Heart of the Country,” and the “Eleanor Rigby”–esque, depressed protagonist of non-album single “Another Day,” a hit from the same sessions”.

There are so many shades and different sounds mixed through Ram. I love how eclectic it is. You get cheeky-yet-romantic songs like The Back Seat of My Car alongside more experimental and out-there tracks like Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey. Ram is an album where McCartney is not directly influenced by his former Beatles bandmate, John Lennon. At the time, there was animosity between them. Whilst Ram’s opening track, Too Many People, contains some clever digs at John Lennon and Yoko Ono, later in 1971, Lennon would attack McCartney on Imagine’s vicious track, How Do You Sleep? In some ways, Ram is like a divorce album. Even if McCartney was breaking away from The Beatles, he could not escape the fallout and bitterness from bandmates (George Harrison was heavily involved with Imagine). I love Ram because he wrote with Linda and there is so much great material. Even though they were married, it must have been strange writing with her. It would have been the first serious collaboration since the end of The Beatles. Rather than it being a confused or transition album, it is a masterpiece that, years after its release, gained the respect and reputation that it deserved all along. Pitchfork reviewed Ram back in 2012. They talk about some of the darker notes on the album, in addition to how Ram has this collaborative/group vibe - that, in spite of the fact Paul McCartney was very much at the front and centre:

“Or actually, "Paul and Linda." This was another one of Paul's chief Ram-related offenses: He not only invited his new photographer bride into the recording studio, he included her name on the record's spine. Ram is the only album in recorded history credited to the artist duo "Paul and Linda McCartney," and in the sense that Linda's enthusiastically warbling vocals appear on almost every song, it's entirely accurate. Some read Paul's decision as the ultimate insult to his former partner: I've got a new collaborator now! Her name is Linda, and she never makes me feel stupid. In the album's freewheeling spirit, however, the decision scans more like guilelessness and innocence. The songs don't feel collaborative so much as cooperative: little schoolhouse plays that required every hand on deck to get off the ground. Paul had the most talent, so naturally he was up front, but he wanted everyone behind him, banging pots, hollering, whistling-- whatever it is you did, make sure you're back there doing it with gusto.

It is exactly this homemade charm that has caught on with generations of listeners as the initial furor around the album subsided. What 2012's ears can find on Ram is a rock icon inventing an approach to pop music that would eventually become someone else's indie pop. It had no trendy name here; it was just a disappointing Beatles solo album. But when Ben Stiller's fussy, pedantic "Greenberg" character painstakingly assembles a mix for Greta Gerwig intended to display the breadth and depth of his pop-culture appreciation, he slides Ram's "Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey" on there. It's the song we see her singing along to enthusiastically in the following montage.

The joy of paying close attention to Ram is gradually discovering that Paul was humming darker things under his breath than it seemed. "Smile Away", for instance, is a messy, romping slab of Buddy Holly rock. Paul makes a joke about his stinky feet. The chorus goes "Smile away, smile away, smile away, smile away, smile away." But it's not just "smile," a brief, cost-free act that can last a second. It's "Smile Away", keeping a fixed grin as conversation grows unpleasant. In interviews of the period, Paul was asked repeatedly if he felt lost without his collaborating partner, if he was motivated solely by commercial success, how he felt about being "the cute Beatle." The backing vocal chant behind "Smile Away" goes, by turns, "Don't know how to do that" and "Learning how to do that." "Smile away horribly, now," Paul slurs over the song's fadeout. Yes, he's fine. No, he and Linda will not become the next "John and Yoko." But thanks so much for asking. If you tell a dog it's a brainless fleabag with the same tone of voice you use to say "Good boy," it will still wag its tail.

The album is riddled with dark grace notes like this: "Monkberry Moon Delight" has an absolutely unhinged vocal take, Paul gulping and sobbing right next to your inner ear. The imagery is surrealist, but anything but whimsical: "When a rattle of rats had awoken/ The sinews, the nerves, and the veins," he bellows. It could be a latter-day Tom Waits performance. "Too Many People" opens with Paul warbling "piece of cake," but the lyrics themselves wag their finger at societal injustices, former bandmates-- basically everybody. The lyrics to "3 Legs" are full of hobbling animals with missing limbs.

The almost-title song "Ram On", could serve as the album's redeeming spirit: A haunting, indelible little tune drifts past on ukulele as Paul croons, "Ram on, give your heart to somebody/ Soon, right away." The title is a play on his old stage name "Paul Ramon," which makes the song a private little prayer; a mirror image, perhaps, to John Lennon's "Hold On". The song is reprised, late in the record, functioning like a calming breeze. "I want a horse, I want a sheep/ Want to get me a good night's sleep," Paul jauntily sings on "Heart of the Country", a city boy's vision of the country if ever there was one, and another clue to the record's mindstate. For Paul, the country isn't just a place where crops grow; it's "a place where holy people grow." Now that American cities everywhere are having their Great Pastoral Moment, full of artisans churning goat's-milk yogurt and canning their own jams, Ram feels like particularly ripe fruit”.

As I say, I am going to discuss various Paul McCartney albums and spend a lot of time on his work with The Beatles (as you would expect!). The only album credited to both him and Linda McCartney is my favourite of his away from Wings (who Linda was a member of) and The Beatles. Over fifty years after its release, critical tone has shifted. I can only imagine what it would have been like for Paul McCartney reading reviews of Ram back in 1971! Ahead of McCartney’s eightieth birthday in June, I wanted to show some love for…

A simply brilliant album.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Honeyglaze

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

Honeyglaze

___________

ONE band who are going to be…

 PHOTO CREDIT: Holly Whittaker

making big splashes this year are Honeyglaze. The London trio are a hugely original group that I have been following for a bit. Whilst a lot of sites are tipping solo artists when it comes to the sound of 2022, I do think there are quite a few bands that deserve mention and support. Honeyglaze should definitely be on everyone’s radar. Red Light Management wrote this about the trio last September:

“Born out of lead songwriter Anouska’s un-desire to be a solo-act, Honeyglaze met officially at their first ever rehearsal, just three days ahead of what was to become a near-residency at their favoured ‘The Windmill’, Brixton.

Forming a mere eighteen-months ahead of a subsequent eighteen-months of mandatory solitude, Honeyglaze have since been making up for lost time, recently performing to a rammed crowd at Green Man festival, and at the iconic 100 Club for Fred Perry’s ‘All Our Tomorrow’s Festival’, with a busy schedule ahead inc. Live at Leeds, and SWN Festival.

Beckoning, becoming and utterly bewitching, their debut single ‘Burglar’ is the coming-of-age lovechild of Whitney’s ‘Forever Turned Around’, and the stylistically-subdued existentialism of Julia Jacklin, or Oregon’s Haley Heynderickx.

In their own words, they describe Honeyglaze as “the ungodly fusion of 3 humans into a clamouring superorganism. It eats only fish, and demands undistracted and constant worship. FFO Power Rangers, Salvador Dalí”.

Speedy Wunderground’s Pierre Hall says of the signing, “We’re so excited to announce Honeyglaze as our next proper signing to the label. We were blown away as soon as we heard their music, and then furthermore when we met them in person. It’s felt like such a natural partnership and they’ve created something really special. We can’t wait for the world to hear. Be prepared to fall in love”.

Recently, Honeyglaze released their new single, Shadows. They also announced their self-titled album will arrive in April. NME reported the news. I think that the Honeyglaze album is going to be one of the most exciting and well-reviewed of this year. There is a lot of excitement around this young band:

“Honeyglaze have announced their self-titled debut album and shared a video for their new single, ‘Shadows’ – scroll down the page to watch it now.

The London band are signed to Speedy Wunderground, the label co-run by respected producer Dan Carey.

‘Shadows’ is accompanied by visuals that follow the band as they create shadows against a collapsible reflector, using hats, head coverings with bunny ears and more. “Mornings always feel like paradise,” Anouska Sokolow sings on the jangly indie song. “Cos shadows always haunt me late at night.”

The video for the track was directed by Sorry’s Asha Lorenz. In a press release, the band said: “For the ‘Shadows’ video, we wanted to be a bit more playful and match the jauntiness of the song. We got together with directors Asha Lorenz and Flo Webb and a load of random props, and improvised shadow play scenes together. We just wanted to go out and have fun. We had no idea it would end in death. It was never our intention to kill Yuri. It just all happened so fast.”

 Singer and guitarist Anouska Sokolow added of the track itself: “‘Shadows’ was written during a time when I had just moved house. I had no curtains in my bedroom and the streetlights would cast shadows into my room. I began to associate shadows with the inability to sleep and the feeling of waiting for the relief that the morning brings.”

The band’s self-titled debut album will be released on April 29 and can be pre-ordered here. The tracklist for ‘Honeyglaze’ is as follows:

‘Start’

‘Shadows’

‘Creative Jealousy’

‘I Am Not Your Cushion’

‘Female Lead’

‘Burglar’

‘Half Past’

‘Deep Murky Water’

‘Young Looking’

‘Souvenir’

‘Childish Things’

Honeyglaze are also set to head out on tour later this month, with support dates for Katy J Pearson and The Lounge Society. A headline tour will follow in May”.

There are a couple of other interviews that I want to bring in before closing off. I would urge people to check out Honeyglaze’s music. They are so different to other bands out there. Once you hear their music, it will definitely not leave your head! I was interested knowing what sounds and artists have inspired Honeyglaze. In an interview with Fred Perry, we learn a bit more about their sonic influences:

“Name, where are you from?

Anouska, Yuri and Tim. We're from London.

Describe your style in three words?

Tall, dark and handsome.

Which Subcultures have influenced you?

We've grown up in the South London rock scene, and all the acts share this paradox of irreverence and darkness that we love. All the jazz jams around London in the past 5 years have also been so inspiring because they prove a supportive community can exist in a big city like this. Our own sound is more inspired by a deep love of 60s soul and 90s dream pop, but it's harder to pick specific subcultures out of that.

A song you wished you had written?

'This Must Be The Place' by Talking Heads. It's just a perfect song in every way. There are emotions in there I've never heard in another song.

Any new bands you are into at the moment?

The Cactus Channel, Drug Store Romeos, Opus Kink, The Soundcarriers, Saul, Katy J Pearson, Ego Ella May, DOG. So many good sounds, so close to home”.

The Line of Best Fit profiled the band late last year. A rising group who are turning heads, I am looking forward to what they deliver on their debut album. If you are looking for a new band who are going to go the distance and are worth sticking with, then I would point you the way of Honeyglaze. The group have a fascinating dynamic and relationship:

“Themselves, three cooly relaxed pieces making up a trifecta built out of vocalist and guitarist Anouska ‘Noush’ Sokolow’s wanting to “avoid the singer/songwriter kind of route.” Starting up the initial solo project under the same moniker - Honeyglaze - “Then I was asked to play a show. And I was like, I want to play with the band,” she laughs.

“I tried playing with a band because I only played like one show, as Honeyglaze anyway. And then I brought Tim and Yuri together in a beautiful fusion one week before our first gig. We had two practices. And then yeah, we just kept playing!”

The other two pieces of this trifecta, drummer Yuri Shibuichi and bassist Tim Curtis are equally representative of Honeyglaze’s smooth surface dichotomy. Shibuichi is the most forthcoming, while Curtis focuses, plotting his conversation. Sokolow retains a similar delicate pointedness.

Coming together for that first show as Honeyglaze - after seeing each other around in other bands - the mutual respect helped them go from assembled pieces to signing to London’s taste-making label Speedy Wunderground, ready for their debut self-titled debut album. “I see us as just progressing towards a slightly more ambitious attitude,” Curtis says. “But not in terms of like, success, but just in terms of expression; just in terms of trying to make music that we really think is good rather than going strictly with the flow. Just really wanting to have a really good live performance basically.”

Honeyglaze are the kind of band that doesn’t pay any mind to following the hype train that’s started up; ignoring any personal push and pull of either being true to themselves or being cliches. “Honestly we come up quite straight edges sometimes. In the venue, just not drinking, sort of being really quiet,” Curtis chuckles.

The natural forces opposing those benchmarks also takes the form of shock value. Shibuichi explains “Personally, I feel like there isn't specifically an inspiration or an influence on how far [we go]. I feel like one thing's for sure for me, [and] it’s that I want people who see us to sort of maybe slightly be a bit surprised or shocked sometimes, or to go away from the show and feel a bit like, ‘wow, like that was a bit as amazing’. Like that was a bit surprising, I guess. Just it's really intense both ways, like just really loud and in your face, or being really, really intimate and pulling it in that direction. I think it's just the play of pulling all those together.”

“I think yeah, playing with the audience's emotions as much as with our own emotions because the more we put in like, the more the audience gets out of it as well. So it's interesting when we have a really intense show people come up to you afterwards. They're like, Oh my god, that was like, really sad...are you okay?” Sokolow laughs”.

A terrific group with a very long future ahead, go and follow them on social media and check out their music. Whilst solo artists emerging are great and warrant focus, there are bands like Honeyglaze that are really strong and are bound for festivals around the country. It may be early days for Honeyglze, but all signs suggest that they are going…

TO go far.

________________

Follow Honeyglaze

FEATURE: Place to Be: Nick Drake’s Pink Moon at Fifty

FEATURE:

 

 

Place to Be

 Nick Drake’s Pink Moon at Fifty

___________

THERE are quite a few classic albums…

celebrating big anniversaries this February. Although it is not fifty until 25th February, I wanted to write about Nick Drake’s third and final studio album, Pink Moon. Sparser and shorter than his other two albums, over eleven tracks spanning just over twenty-two minutes, we get this incredibly beautiful album that features Drake without a backing band. It is just him, an acoustic guitar and  a bit of piano on the title track. Pink Moon is definitely a great album to have on vinyl. Ahead of its fiftieth anniversary, I wanted to pay tribute to one of the best albums ever. Drake sadly died in 1974 at the age of twenty-six. It is fascinating to think what he could have gone to create if he had lived. Whilst some prefer his 1969 debut, Five Leaves Left, other pip for 1971’s Bryter Layter. I think that his most affecting and memorable album is Pink Moon. It is the gravity and focus on his voice and acoustic guitar that makes it such a spellbinding listen. Rather than it being haunting and morbid, it is an album that is so evocative and nuanced. You need to play it through a lot so that all of the songs can reveal their layers. Sadly, Drake's first two albums with Island Records sold poorly. This, together with Drake's reluctance to perform live or engage in album promotion, meant that the label was not confident of another album from him.

The songwriter was suffering from severe depression, so it is understandable that he did not want to tour or conduct interviews. Many associate Pink Moon with depression and this very bleak time. Cally Calloman of Bryter Music, which manages Drake's estate, has stated Drake could not write whilst badly depressed. He was not in a bleak state whilst writing Pink Moon. In fact, he was hugely pleased and proud of the album. There are a range of articles that I want to pepper in (well, they are actually quite long!), to give us an idea of how Pink Moon came to be. This first piece actually nods to Drake’s mental-health issues prior to recording Pink Moon:

“By 1971, the 23-year-old was overwhelmed by depression and had lost all confidence as a live performer. His final public gig, at Ewell Technical College, in Surrey, in June 1970, had been abandoned halfway through the song “Fruit Tree” before a disconsolate Drake walked off stage.

With no immediate plans to make a new record to follow 1969’s Five Leaves Left and 1971’s Bryter Layter, Drake spent time recuperating at Chris Blackwell’s Spanish villa, at the personal request of the concerned Island Records chief. Drake then snuck away with producer John Wood to lay down a new album, which was recorded over just two late-night sessions at Sound Techniques in London’s Chelsea, in October 1971. Wood later said that “it felt like there was a kind of urgency about it.”

Pink Moon is Drake’s music at its starkest and most uncompromising: no other musicians, no arrangements, just Drake and his acoustic guitar and one piano solo on the title track, with its ill-omened pink moon a portent of disaster. Drake did not know what he wanted on the cover of his new album, except that it had to feature a pink moon. In the end, a surrealist painting by Michael Trevithick, who was the boyfriend of Drake’s sister Gabrielle, was chosen and seems fitting.

The album, which is only 28 minutes long, has an unsettling simplicity. Drake said he didn’t want it arranged, just to stand “naked.” In the brilliant and bleak “Parasite,” Drake uses the device of a journey on the Northern Line of the London Underground to offer a chilling view of the emptiness of contemporary life.

Pink Moon received good reviews, but its intimations of darkness (“Now I’m weaker than the palest blue,” Drake sings in the masterful “Place To Be”) left people feeling uncomfortable. Nevertheless, Island Records kept faith in the young singer, and the company knew that with such exceptional songs (“Road,” “Which Will”) they had something special on their hands. One of the highlights is “Things Behind The Sun,” on which Drake plays some beguiling picking guitar as he sings:

Please beware of them that stare

They’ll only smile to see you while

Your time away

And once you’ve seen what they have been

To win the earth just won’t seem worth

Your night or your day

Drake was a talented technical guitarist and a painstaking musician. For example, he tuned his bottom string down to a low A just so he would get the right fret on one line of “Free Ride,” to emphasize one of the lines. Danny Thompson, who worked with Drake on Five Leaves Left and played bass on John Martyn’s classic Solid Air, which is an album about Drake, said: “Ultimately, it’s the real beauty of his music that draws people in, and his stunning guitar playing, which was so clean.”

The lack of sales for Pink Moon disappointed Drake, whose depression was deepening. He died on November 25, 1974, at the age of 26, from an overdose of anti-depressants. It was a tragedy that passed largely unnoticed at the time.

The three albums which Nick Drake had made in his short lifetime were all, in commercial terms, unsuccessful, even though leading musicians such as Martyn and Richard Thompson urged people to listen to Pink Moon. Eventually, long after his death, people took notice and Pink Moon posthumously went Platinum”.

There is a genius to Drake’s guitar playing throughout 1972’s Pink Moon. A lot of people remark on his vocals and lyrics, though I do not often see people commending his inventive and expressive guitar style. Guitar were in awe of Drake’s playing when they revisited Pink Moon in 2020:

“After his great bid for commercial success, Bryter Later, was met with a slightly perplexed critical reception and commercial failure, Drake vowed to strip his sound down to its basic elements of guitar and voice. In the one interview with the press he did in his life, he told Sounds that for his next release: “I had the idea of just doing something with John Wood, the engineer at Sound Techniques.”

Reenergised by time recuperating in Chris Blackwell’s villa in Spain, Drake returned to London in October 1971 and recorded the entire 11-track, 28-minute album across two nocturnal sessions that began at 11pm. And apart from the luminous 10-second piano part he played on its title track, that’s all Pink Moon is – one man playing his guitar and singing.

Legend has it that Drake wordlessly dropped the album’s masters off at Island’s reception in a bag and scurried away. Island’s press officer David Sandison recalls that in fact, he saw Nick at the reception with the masters under his arm and invited him up to his office, where he stayed for half an hour before leaving. “About an hour later, the girl who worked behind the front desk called up and said ‘Nick’s left his tapes behind.’ So I went down and it was the big 16-track master tape and it said ‘Nick Drake Pink Moon’, and I thought, ‘that’s not an album I know.’”

The press release that accompanied the album’s release recounted the incident, bluntly adding: “His first two albums haven’t sold a shit. But if we carry on releasing them, then perhaps someone authoritative will stop, listen properly and agree with us.”

Supernatural picking

By all accounts, Drake was a faultless studio performer, the fact that he rarely dropped a note testament to the hours he would (cue montage) smoke weed and repeat and cycle complex riffs in his dorm room at university, in his bedroom at Far Leys, in his bedsit in London. Despite the hours of hypnotic repetition this implies, according to Robert Kirby, a friend from Drake’s uni years who contributed string arrangements for his earlier albums: “Don’t think for one minute that Nick lacked artistic spontaneity. He could dazzle for hours with electrifying improvisations in many styles (including his own) and play many authentic blues styles.”

He was a musician whose music, for all its approachable outward simplicity, possesses a level of detail and inner complexity that renders it essentially uncoverable. As with his lyrics, there are so many paradoxes in his guitar playing alone: diverse alternate tunings facilitate simple, often single-finger chords; classical sensibilities meld with the physicality of the blues; the ambiguity between major and minor in his chord voicings hover, unresolved; he could orchestrate complex fingerpicking (Road) or just repeat four rattling notes (Know). That last song is even constructed of oppositions: (‘Know that I love you, Know I don’t care…’).

His producer Joe Boyd summarised his playing in the A Skin Too Few documentary: “When you listen back to the records one of the things that’s most extraordinary is the guitar. Because it’s so clean and so strong and all the notes are so equally balanced. It’s so unusual to have such complicated fingerpicking parts played in such a clear and strong way – every note – so that you really can construct the whole recording around the guitar”.

There are a couple of reviews that I want to finish off with. The first, from Beats Per Minute is extremely extensive. Every song on Pink Moon is outstanding. The music provokes so many emotions! An excellent and informative feature, I wanted to use quite a bit of it:

“Pink Moon” is a song with a straightforward message, but an uncertain meaning. Sung in Drake’s distinct smooth soulful voice, he tells us that our fate is coming soon: “Saw it written and I saw it say/ Pink moon is on its way/ And none of you stand so tall/ Pink Moon gonna get you all.” Like most of his songs off this album, they come off as poetic and bleak, like a dark sorrowed soul that lived within him. This song might be about a malicious feeling infecting the people who surround him, or it could simply be a metaphor for death coming for them no matter how tall they stand. As terrible as that sounds, he doesn’t sing it in just a sad way, but more haunting with a heavy heart, like he’s given up on saving himself and others, which reflected well on his own life at the time. Similarly, his guitar gives a chord-filled, harmonic melody while the piano break in the middle of the song offers a nice break and sets the mood for this depressing outlook into the near future.

“Place To Be” is a much more structured song than the previous track, with three stanzas describing three different parts of his life: naivety, rejection, and desperation. The love for this girl that Drake missed so much makes this one of the more emotional tracks on Pink Moon. In each verse, he compares moments of times before when he was happy to the moments present where he is in need for the girl he has lost. In “Road,” he takes a different approach about love where it makes him seem okay with the loss, as opposed to felling heartbroken about it, telling her “You can take the road that takes you to the stars now/ I can take the road that’ll see me through.”

After “Which Will,” a mellifluous song about indecisiveness with life’s given choices (clearly another page ripped out of his book), Drake plays his only instrumental of the album, “Horn.” Although the entire album is done with his acoustic guitar, and this is no different, the delicately strummed, soft guitar of “Horn” can act as the beautiful transitional period in between the album.

Following the short piece, “Things Behind The Sun” clocks in at just under four minutes, making it the longest song on the album. Here, Drake again sings about the shallow people who surround his life (“them that stare”) and how they can be however they want, but he can see past the sense of semblance and see that they’re all still sad inside. The depression that slowly filled his own life made it that much easier to see how everyone else in the world is just as depressed as him, with only their phony façade covering up their real feelings. The way he describes it all in song is extremely poetic and mysterious, ultimately asking “Who will hear what I say?” which makes everything look even more desolate.

“Know” is the least difficult song to understand, but also one of the most clever. There are no complex guitar chords, but just a simple two-second long bluesy beat played repeatedly over the course of the song. For the first half, he hums to himself for awhile, then declares painfully “Know that I love you/ Know I don’t care/ Know that I see you/ Know I’m not there.” These unsettling lyrics need nothing more to say to get the point across. Lines one and three are the role of him, while lines two and four are told from the point of view of the one he desires. The juxtaposition of these lines not only show how he is so rejected from the people he loved, but it can also be interpreted that it’s “no” instead of “know” for the opposite’s lines. It is brilliant lyrics like these that make this one of the strongest songs on Pink Moon.

Further on in the record, he relates himself as being a worthless bug, better off dead (“Parasite”), and an effortless weak soul who contributes to nothing (“Free Ride”), but what finishes his deed is “Harvest Breed.” While some of the songs featured prior to this one develop some slight chance of hope, “Harvest Breed” is without question the song about his acceptance and acknowledgement of his impending death. Singing simply that “he’s ready” and that “this could be the end” makes this a dramatic finish to his life through song. His hopelessness clouds any positive thoughts he might have had before and, as if the previous nine songs projected his outlook on the unwelcoming life he lived, this is the point where he lets go and starts “falling fast and falling free.”

After what can only be assumed as a strikingly ominous, eerie ending to the album, along comes the real last track of Pink Moon “From the Morning,” which takes on a completely different change of pace. After hearing ten tracks of depression, emotionally sick times, and anguish, “From the Morning” is sung with the most upbeat approach imaginable for Drake. The guitar is colorful and rhythmic and Drake’s lyrics reflect this as well, clearing up his cloudy mind and singing about what life has to offer that is beautiful: “So look see the days/ The endless colored ways/ And go play the game you learnt/ From the morning.” It’s as if the Pink Moon shone over Drake during the gloomiest moments of his life and throughout the album, while the sun rising in “From the Morning” represents a new life, a new direction to take. It may even just be Drake’s soul ascending to the heavens and relaying how this might not be the place for him, but don’t give up your own life for what he couldn’t appreciate. It’s such an impressive way to end an album that seemingly acts as one big story for Drake’s disheartened life at the time and still giving himself that extra message to keep on going, because the sun will rise again.

Unfortunately, the sun never did rise for Nick Drake again. Pink Moon had worse initial sales than his first two albums originally sold, which sent him into a worse depression and insomnia. On November 25, 1974, at the young age of 26, he died of an overdose of his prescribed antidepressant. Whether it was an accident or suicide was never determined, but looking back on the songs he sang, it acted more like what was to come of Drake than anything. Two years before his death, he knew he wasn’t going to last very long.

More importantly though, his fame slowly rose as big artists from the ’80s and ’90s, such as R.E.M., The Cure, Jeff Buckley, and Elliot Smith began recognizing him as a big influence for their music. He hit an even bigger audience when his song “Pink Moon” was used for a Volkswagen Cabrio commercial in 1999 titled “Milky Way” and eventually led his album to receive huge sales. Slowly he became a more noticeable figure in the music world and by the end of the ’90s, he was a household name to fans and critics, receiving high honors from multiple acclaimed sources, such as the 13th best album of the ’70s by Pitchfork and 320th best album of all time by Rolling Stone.

For a man who felt so small in his time, looking back on it now, Nick Drake created for many more people what is considerably one of the most emotionally draining and most influential folk albums of all time. This is the classic example of how one person can pour every last bit of themselves into an album with such raw despondency and without all of the unnecessary amounts of overproduction to make up for it. No one at Island Records or his producer expected him to make this album, but it’s possible he did it to preserve his life and dying wish before he knew he’d soon be gone. He may have died a tragically early death, but it’s great to see that he became recognized for his genius lyrics and albums like Pink Moon, even if he thought it was certain it would never go his way”.

I am going to round off with a final review. There are others who will mark the fiftieth anniversary of Pink Moon before 25th February. They might look at the album’s legacy, or the position it occupies alongside Nick Drake’s other studio albums. I wanted to give a more general overview of one of the 1970s’ most astonishing albums. This is what AllMusic had to offer in their review:

“After two albums of tastefully orchestrated folk-pop, albeit some of the least demonstrative and most affecting around, Drake chose a radical change for what turned out to be his final album. Not even half-an-hour long, with 11 short songs and no more -- he famously remarked at the time that he simply had no more to record -- Pink Moon more than anything else is the record that made Drake the cult figure he remains. Specifically, Pink Moon is the bleakest of them all; that the likes of Belle and Sebastian are fans of Drake may be clear enough, but it's doubtful they could ever achieve the calm, focused anguish of this album, as harrowing as it is attractive. No side musicians or outside performers help this time around -- it's simply Drake and Drake alone on vocals, acoustic guitar, and a bit of piano, recorded by regular producer Joe Boyd but otherwise untouched by anyone else. The lead-off title track was eventually used in a Volkswagen commercial nearly 30 years later, giving him another renewed burst of appreciation -- one of life's many ironies, in that such an affecting song, Drake's softly keened singing and gentle strumming, could turn up in such a strange context. The remainder of the album follows the same general path, with Drake's elegant melancholia avoiding sounding pretentious in the least thanks to his continued embrace of simple, tender vocalizing. Meanwhile, the sheer majesty of his guitar playing -- consider the opening notes of "Road" or "Parasite" -- makes for a breathless wonder to behold”.

Whilst its creator is no longer with us, the sheer majesty and perfection of Pink Moon lives on. It is gentle yet powerful; it is hushed yet carries so much weight. Everyone will have their own words to describe Pink Moon. My favourite lyrics are at the end of the final track. From the Morning: “So look see the sights/The endless summer nights/And go play the game that you learnt/From the mornin’”. There are so many beautiful and standout lines and moments through Pink Moon. It is an album that will be cherished and discussed…

FOR so many years to come.

FEATURE: On a Plain: Kurt Cobain at Fifty-Five: His Legacy and Genius

FEATURE:

 

 

On a Plain

IN THIS PHOTO: Kurt Cobain during the taping of MTV Unplugged at Sony Studios in New York City/PHOTO CREDIT: Frank Micelotta/Getty 

Kurt Cobain at Fifty-Five: His Legacy and Genius

___________

ON 20th February…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kurt Cobain alongside Nirvana bandmates Krist Novoselic and Dave Grohl/PHOTO CREDIT: Jesse Frohman/Trunk Archive

the world will mark what would have been Kurt Cobain’s fifty-fifth birthday. A ‘90s icon who was the lead of one of the most influential bands of their time, Nirvana, his songwriting brilliance, feminist attitude and captivating personality made him a hero to millions. Before coming to features about his legacy and what made Cobain so special, it is worth knowing more about one of the most iconic and revered songwriters ever. AllMusic’s biography provides great detail:

“As the lead singer and guitarist of Nirvana, Kurt Cobain's musical success began in his twenties and was heightened when he formed the band Nirvana. Hits such as "Smells Like Teen Spirit," "Come as You Are," and "Heart Shaped Box" helped the group achieve international success.

Cobain was born in Aberdeen, Washington. Hyperactive as a youngster, he was given Ritalin to help him concentrate in school and sedatives to help him sleep at night. At the age of seven, his parents got divorced. He became so difficult to live with that his parents sent him to live with relatives. This period in his life is reflected in songs such as "Sliver." With a dislike for school, Cobain spent his time painting and singing. He listened to the Beatles and the Monkees, but changed to bands such as Kiss, Black Sabbath, the Sex Pistols, and the Clash in 1979. On his 14th birthday, Cobain bought his first guitar and started experimenting with different musical styles. He also was a roadie for a Seattle group called the Melvins. He dropped out of high school a few weeks before graduation to get a job, but his efforts were unsuccessful because he couldn't hold a job for very long.

In 1986 the group Nirvana was formed with Cobain on vocals and guitar, Krist Novaselic on bass guitar, and various drummers. Their first album, Bleach, was released in 1989. They toured the U.S. and had their first international concert in Newcastle, England. Their second single was unsuccessful, so they changed record companies. After signing with Geffen Records in 1991, and adding permanent drummer Dave Grohl, they produced their second album, Nevermind, which received rave reviews with the hits "Smells Like Teen Spirit," "Come as You Are," and "Lithium." Their popularity grew after the group made appearances on MTV's Headbanger's Ball and NBC's Saturday Night Live. The success of the band was intimidating to Cobain, who liked the intimate setting of nightclubs; it was the money that guided them to do concerts and shows in the rock arena. It was in the early '90s that Cobain began doing heavy drugs such as morphine and heroin, but in 1992 his personal life brightened as he married Courtney Love in Hawaii, and their union brought a daughter, Frances Bean. With a wife and daughter, Cobain calmed a bit, and the group released Incesticide.

Things took a turn for the worse in 1993 when Cobain overdosed on heroin. After seeking rehabilitation for a time in a center, he left without completing the program. During this time the band played on. In 1993, the band released In Utero, their last studio-recorded album. Nirvana played an MTV Unplugged concert and a concert in Munich in 1994. One week after the concert in Munich, Kurt Cobain was hospitalized in a coma. After waking up and leaving voluntarily, he was reported missing and was found three days later in his house, dead of a gunshot wound.

Over the next two decades, Cobain's legend only grew, thanks in part to posthumous Nirvana recordings. The live albums MTV Unplugged in New York and From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah appeared in 1994 and 1996, respectively, and in 2002, an eponymous greatest hits album appeared. Two years later, the rarities and outtakes box With the Lights Out saw release and that was the last major archival release until 2015, when Brett Morgen directed the documentary Montage of Heck. The film was accompanied by the release of a soundtrack album, containing home recordings and demos by Cobain; it was the first-ever album to be credited to Cobain alone”.

Whilst, in 2022, there might not be more to say about Cobain’s legacy and brilliance, it is worth noting what he left the world following his premature death in 1994. Ahead of a big birthday where fans will mark his passing in addition to celebrating his music and the words he put out into the world, I wanted to source a few articles where writers have tried to explain what his legacy and influence is. Last year, twenty-seven years after Cobain’s suicide, this article tells how Cobain and Nirvana inspired their peers, and how Nirvana’s iconic MTV Unplugged set showed new talents and multiple sides of Cobain:

“From the yellow wiggly smiley face you see everywhere to their infamous naked baby 1991 album Nevermind still seen in music shops, there is no denying that Nirvana is the most influential grunge band of all time. As of 31st March 2021, the band has just over 17,255,000 monthly listeners and their most well-known song ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’, has just over 933,525,000 plays on Spotify! They are certainly not going away any time soon.

While the hot debate surrounding what can be defined as grunge has been going on since the mid-80s, Nirvana embraced it for what they assumed it to be. Musically, grunge is an underground genre that borrows from punk, metal, rock and to a certain extent, pop. Under the talent of Cobain, Nirvana surprised the world with their second album, Nevermind breaking tradition by having huge success on radio, MTV, CD, and tape recordings, thus launching the genre into the mainstream. They were raw and unpolished; that’s what was needed then.

Furthermore, their iconic Nirvana MTV Unplugged 1993/1994 set reminded viewers and listeners that they were more than your average Joe. Although the infamous 1992 MTV Awards (when Nirvana performed) may lead many to question why the band would agree to perform for MTV Unplugged, it came at a time where the TV station’s popularity was dipping. Cobain’s motives will never be clear, but one thing is for sure – they rocked the roof off! Viewership for this much-anticipated release did wonders for MTV and showed the entire world that Nirvana were not just some shouty, rowdy men who turned the volume up to 100. This was their time to shine and show their talent off. From ‘All Apologies’ to ‘About A Girl’, they were stripping back and showing off the incredible vocal skills and writings of Cobain. Oh, and the band were willing to take risks by performing covers of David Bowie, who, according to The Independent, was ‘regarded as a sort of super-naff crazy uncle to Phil Collins. It is hard to convey just how uncool he still was in the early Nineties.’ They made it their own.

Cobain became an icon himself. With his clothing style, unphased attitude and his refusal to be inauthentic – many idolised him, and still do. He was ahead of his time; he was even arrested for spray-painting ‘God is Gay’ on police cars in Washington state. He was also modest about his own talent, saying that ‘We’re from the learn-as-you-play school. We’re still in it.’ Cobain came from a small town and dreamed of making it big time. That’s what he did; he never gave up”.

Arts & Culture wrote about Kurt Cobain’s legacy back in 2019. It is clear that the world has not witnessed anyone like him since. Even if he was a reluctant voice of a generation, Cobain had a power and pull that has lasted to this very day:

“The grunge wave Cobain fronted kicked out 1980s pop and rock, and set the glum tone for modern guitar music forevermore, from Korn, Linkin Park and Nickelback to early Radiohead and beyond. What then seemed like a passing trend was arguably rock's last hurrah – a milieu today held up with more misty-eyed affection than any movement in guitar music since. In truth, grunge was a nebulous conceit, coined by journalists lazily clumping together scruffily dressed rockers of different musical allegiances – Seattle also-rans Pearl Jam, Cornell's Soundgarden and Alice in Chains owed more to the big riffs of commercial 1970s rock and heavy metal.

IN THIS PHOTO: Kurt Cobain and Courtney Love/PHOTO CREDIT: Michael Lavine 

It's not easy for anyone to serve as the spokesperson for a generation, but quick-witted Cobain seemingly made maladjusted discontent and media antagonism appear an art-form. His widow Courtney Love implies he "chose" a life of drug abuse, and Cobain's strung out visage is the epitome of the oxymoronic phrase "elegantly wasted". Marc Jacobs's high-end grunge clothing range may have little to do with Cobain's thrift-store rags that inspired them – but like a Che Guevara or Bob Marley T-shirt, a Cobain image today represents a statement more cultural than musical. And it's not One Love or socialist revolt that Cobain stood for.

"Teenage angst has paid off well, now I'm bored and old," Cobain sang on In Utero's opener Serve the Servants. He always had a shrewd awareness of his legacy and repute, as the theatre of Unplugged and the scrawl of his suicide note show – complete with that priceless Neil Young quote, "It's better to burn out than to fade away”.

There is one more article that I want to illustrate. In 2020, The Boar also had their say when it came to explaining the relevance and influence of Kurt Cobain. One reason why so many people admired Cobain was his very progressive thinking (in a decade where not all male Rock and Grunge artists would have shared his worldview and intelligence):

“As the anniversary of his death comes around again – is this really how we want to remember him? Is this how we preserve him in history, as a tragic young man and a member of the fabled 27 Club? Speculating over the circumstances of his death, even now, won’t do anything. It won’t bring him back.

It is important to acknowledge the tragedy of his suicide and to understand that Cobain was a troubled man. He suffered from depression and addiction. His life was oftentimes difficult. That shouldn’t be ignored but it also shouldn’t be glamorised.

It is more important to instead remember how Kurt Cobain lived, rather than how he died. His legacy is first and foremost the music he made with Nirvana, that to this day still has the ability to inspire and empower. For some, it is the gateway to a love of rock music that lasts a lifetime. I still remember the first time I heard ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ when I was 15. I thought: “Where has this band been my entire life?” He gave us even more great music than just their signature song: ‘Heart-Shaped Box’, ‘Lithium’, ‘Breed’, ‘Come As You Are’, ‘Negative Creep’, just to name a few. These songs, two decades after their initial release, are still relevant and still capture people’s attention. That takes talent.

Something we should also acknowledge when we talk about Kurt Cobain is his political progressiveness

Nirvana also pushed the grunge genre forward more than any other band. Their commercial breakthrough, 1991’s Nevermind, is credited with establishing the commercial potential of rock music, taking it from its underground roots and the specialist sections of record stores to the bright lights of the mainstream. That is a big ask for a genre that is perhaps not the most palatable to every taste (try playing ‘Territorial Pissings’ to your parents – or, on second thought don’t). What it is, then, is a testament to the power of their underground fanbase, as well as the band’s music itself for resonating with enough people to make that happen.

Something we should also acknowledge when we talk about Kurt Cobain is his political progressiveness. In the liner notes of compilation album Incesticide, he writes “If any of you in any way hate homosexuals, people of a different colour or women, please do this one favour for us… don’t come to our shows, don’t buy our records.” He continued to speak up for feminism, having often associated himself with bands of the Riot Grrrl movement, and was even known to wear dresses on stage. He also spoke up for LGBT rights in a time where it was a far more contentious subject than today, and once admitted in an interview that he ‘could be bisexual’. He also penned two anti-rape songs, ‘Polly’ from Nevermind and ‘Rape Me’ from In Utero that denounced sexual violence while also acknowledging the strength of rape survivors.

Even if he is no longer around, Kurt Cobain’s voice, his words, and his melodies can never be taken from us. When we remember him, let’s celebrate him both for the person he was and the music he made. Let that be his legacy”.

As we get closer to 20th February, there will be various articles and new pieces that talk about Kurt Cobain from a number of angles. From the sense of torture and doom that he felt towards the end of his life through to Nirvana’s brilliance, all the way to how he affected the new generation of artists coming through, his death definitely left a huge gulf in the world. Even from Nirvana’s 1989 debut album, Bleach, we could definitely tell Cobain was a rarefied talent. 1991’s Nevermind and 1993’s In Utero solidified that. Although he quoted a famous Neil Young quote/lyric in his suicide note, “It's better to burn out than to fade away”, the genius and importance of the peerless Cobain…

COULD and never will fade.

FEATURE: Between the Bars: Elliott Smith's Either/Or at Twenty-Five

FEATURE:

 

 

Between the Bars

Elliott Smith's Either/Or at Twenty-Five

___________

BACK in 2003…

the world received the heartbreaking news that Elliott Smith had died (from suspected self-inflicted stab wounds). The Portland-born songwriter was only thirty-four. In his short lifetime, he left us with some phenomenal albums. One of his very best turns twenty-five on 25th February, 1997. Either/Or was recorded in several locations, mostly in Portland, Oregon, and it was produced by Smith, Tom Rothrock and Rob Schnapf. Containing tracks such as Angeles, and the immortal Behind the Bars, Either/Or is regarded as one of the best albums ever. It is possessed of masterful and beautiful songwriting throughout. I think that, prior to its twenty-fifth anniversary, more people should listen to it. I am a recent convert of Elliott Smith, and I have spent a lot of time with Either/Or. It is one of the most affecting albums that I have ever heard. To show its reputation and impact, there are some reviews that I want to source, prior to rounding things off. The Observer looked back at Either/Or on its twentieth anniversary in 2017:

“When Slim Moon and Tinuviel Sampson founded Kill Rock Stars in 1991, the record label was distinct among the American indie scene with its roster made up almost exclusively of female artists. That all changed the day Moon signed singer-songwriter Elliott Smith.

The guitarist and vocalist of esteemed Portland indie-pop outfit Heatmiser was no stranger to recording under his own name, crafting a stark, brittle solo debut in 1994 with Roman Candle for the Cavity Search imprint utilizing nothing more than a cheap four-track and a Radio Shack microphone to capture the sound.

Smith expanded his lo-fi setting to include elements of drums, harmonica, cello and organ upon debuting on Kill Rock Stars with his self-titled second solo LP in 1995. Nevertheless, it was an album unique to the company line not only in gender but style as well; the folky wisp of Elliott Smith was a stark contrast to the more aggressive punk energy of popular groups like Huggy Bear, Bikini Kill and Sleater-Kinney.

But it wasn’t until Smith released Either/Or on February 25, 1997 that his legend was carved in stone.

A genuine pop masterpiece boasting a fuller, richer sound, Either/Or was the launching pad that catapulted Smith from the tiny clubs of Portland to playing the Oscars at The Shrine Auditorium when we was nominated for a song he wrote for Gus Van Sant’s Good Will Hunting.

It became the Cinderella story of 1997: the first male marquee act on Kill Rock Stars ascends from the CMJ charts to the Academy Award nomination for Best Original Song with “Miss Misery”—a song that wasn’t on Either/Or, but which embodies everything that has rendered the LP as Smith’s singular masterpiece to this very day.

Massachusetts alt-folk icon Mary Lou Lord once quipped about her longtime friend that Smith was a quintessential balance of Nick Drake and Lou Barlow. But with Either/Or, Smith established himself as far more than just a master of pastiche. He pushed his deep love for The Beatles to the fore with a sweet, scraggly variation of the kind of intimacy Paul McCartney leaned toward on McCartney and RAM, but his disarming, evocative lyrics and elegant yet vulnerable delivery were pure Elliott Smith”.

Whilst Either/Or was a transitional album from Smith, that did not mean a lack of focus, quality or cohesiveness. Quite the opposite in fact. 1998’s XO was Smith’s first album with a major label, DreamWorks. The A.V. Club discussed how Either/Or was the end of one particular phase of Smith’s career:

“Either/Or represents many poles in Smith’s career. His first release post-Heatmiser would be his last for Kill Rock Stars, the indie stalwart founded by Slim Moon and Tinuviel Sampson in 1991. It’s the beginning of a three-record run with producers Tom Rothrock and Rob Schnapf (who’d also worked on Mic City Sons), and the end of Smith’s time in Oregon. The liner notes of Either/Or trace a farewell tour around the singer-songwriter’s adopted hometown, from references to geographic locations (“Alameda”) and local rituals (“Rose Parade”) to the names of fellow scene fixtures who gave him the space to lay down tracks (Joanna Bolme of Stephen Malkmus And The Jicks and Quasi; Larry Crane, with whom Smith would build Jackpot! Recording Studio). While Either/Or says goodbye, it makes a sideways introduction to the geographic muse on Smith’s horizon: “So good to meet you / Angeles.”

Either/Or is, in the purest sense of the word, a transitional work. (Something this very publication noted at the time of its release.) Whereas that term could connote incompletion and uncertainty, for Either/Or, it’s progression. No album so capricious—from the Kiekergaardian disjunction of its title to the “They want you or they don’t” of its closing track, “Say Yes”—should sound so confident, accomplished, and driven. But Smith was nothing if not confident, accomplished, and driven in the studio in the mid-1990s, qualities that are once more evident in the remastered tracks on Kill Rock Stars’ 20th-anniversary edition of Either/Or (due March 10). “He would record one live take of vocal and guitar together, and then he would just double to it once we got it,” producer Schnapf told Pitchfork in 2013.

“It was just absurd. The guitar stuff isn’t even easy. It was ridiculous that he was able to just nail a vocal and guitar performance live, and he was able to double it live again. I mean, it’s not like he’s strumming G, C, D. There’s intricate little fills. It sounds so natural, and so simple—then you try to play it. And sing at the same time. He was just really good. Understated, but really good.”

There’s a modesty to Either/Or that keeps the technical proficiency from overwhelming the proceedings. “It could easily have been bigger-sounding,” Schnapf says in the Pitchfork oral history. “We could have blown it up more, but he wasn’t ready to do it just yet.” Though its instrumentation is bulked-up from the folk-busker arrangements of Smith’s first two records, that instrumentation gets no more ornate than a few keyboard parts. Smith’s chops are always in service of his songs, the complex picking on “Alameda” and “Angeles” or the ripping solo on “Cupid’s Trick” born from and enhanced by his ear for melody and composition. The instrumental breakdown in “Pictures Of Me” is particularly impressive in this respect, as Smith pulls together a few measures of Beatles pastiche that calls to mind multiple eras of the band”.

I hope that, through this feature, I have persuaded a few people to check out Elliott Smith’s Either/Or. It is a sublime album that will definitely receive closer scrutiny ahead of its twenty-fifth anniversary on 25th February. I wanted to write something ahead of time. To round off, I want to bring in a review from AllMusic. This is what they had to say about one of Smith’s masterpieces:

“Elliott Smith's third album sees his one-man show getting a little more ambitious. While he still plays all the instruments himself, he plays more of them. Several of the songs mimic the melody mastery of pop bands from 1960s. The most alluring numbers, however, are still his quietly melancholy acoustic ones. While the full-band songs are catchy and smart, Smith's recording equipment isn't quite up to the standards set by the Beatles and the Beach Boys. The humbler arrangements are better suited to the sparse equipment. "Between the Bars," for example, plays Smith's strengths perfectly. He sings, in his endearingly limited whisper, of late-night drinking and introspection, and his subdued strumming creates a minor-key mood befitting the mysteries of self. "Angeles" is equally ethereal -- Smith's acoustic fingerpicking spins out notes which briskly move around a single atmospheric keyboard chord, like aural minnows swimming toward a solitary light at the surface of the water. The lyrics are a darkly biting rejection of the hypercapitalist dream machinery of Los Angeles (it would make a great theme song for Smith's label, Kill Rock Stars). Ironically, "Angeles" was included on the Good Will Hunting soundtrack, which won Smith the acclaim of Hollywood's biggest, brightest, and best connected voting body, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. Smith's stock in L.A. soared after he took his bow at the Oscars with Celine Dion and Trisha Yearwood. It might have been more interesting had he sung "Angeles”.

When people think of the defining albums of the 1990s, I wonder how many people talk about Elliott Smith’s Either/Or? To me, it is as important as anything released in the decade. An album that still sounds so powerful and moving to this day, his final release with the Kill Rock Stars label is absolutely stunning. Even though it is nearly twenty-five years old, the incredible Either/Or…

WILL not fade or age.

FEATURE: The Lockdown Playlist: Graham Nash at Eighty: His Finest Cuts

FEATURE:

 

 

The Lockdown Playlist

PHOTO CREDIT: Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images

Graham Nash at Eighty: His Finest Cuts

___________

BECAUSE the legendary Graham Nash…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young/PHOTO CREDIT: Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images

is eighty on 2nd February, I wanted to put together a playlist of his best solo and group work (including tracks from The Hollies, Crosby, Stills & Nash and Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young). The Blackpool-born songwriter has penned classics like Marrakesh Express. Rather than include songs that he has written, I wanted to broaden it out and feature those he has appeared on. Before that, here is some biography from AllMusic:

“Graham Nash played a pivotal part in at least two of the major musical movements of the classic rock era. He started his professional career as a member of the Hollies, a pioneering British Invasion group who defined a specific segment of '60s harmony-laden guitar pop. Once he left the band, he joined forces with Stephen Stills of Buffalo Springfield and David Crosby of the Byrds to form the supergroup Crosby, Stills & Nash, a trio that helped usher in the transition from hippie folk-rock to the reflective singer/songwriters of the '70s. Nash entered the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame with both groups but his career wasn't limited to those two bands. Beginning with 1971's Songs for Beginners, he maintained a concurrent solo recording career, releasing new albums every so often, and he also busied himself with philanthropy and photography. The latter endeavor proved particularly lucrative, resulting in auctions in Sotheby's, exhibitions, and publications of his own work, but his success as a photographer couldn't overshadow his long musical legacy. The 2006 collection On a Carousel, 1963-1974: The Ultimate Hollies is an excellent sampler dominated by his era with the group, 1969's Crosby, Stills & Nash was the trio's defining work, and Nash's solo career was bookended by a pair of his strongest efforts, Songs for Beginners and 2016's This Path Tonight.

Born in Blackpool, England but raised in Manchester, Nash started playing music as a teenager, picking up the guitar during Britain's skiffle craze of the mid-'50s. In 1955, he formed the Two Teens with his schoolmate Allan Clarke and the pair performed regularly over the next few years, eventually drifting from skiffle to rock & roll. When they attempted to sound like the Everly Brothers they called themselves Ricky & Dane and after they bought Guytone electric guitars, they switched their name to the Guytones. By 1960, the duo were playing in a band called the Fourtones when they were recruited to supplement the Deltas, which featured bassist Eric Haydock and drummer Don Rathbone. Once the group added lead guitarist Tony Hicks in 1961, the band underwent one final name change, dubbing themselves the Hollies in a salute to chief inspiration Buddy Holly.

Signing with EMI in 1963, the Hollies had their first U.K. Top Ten hit later that year with a cover of Maurice Williams & the Zodiacs' "Stay." Their subsequent 1963 and 1964 British hits were covers, with the band releasing their first original, "We're Through" -- written by Nash, Clarke, and Hicks under the pseudonym "L. Ransford" -- in late 1964. The Hollies' golden era began in 1965, when "I'm Alive" became their first -- and only -- number one British hit, and "Look Through Any Window" brought them into the American Top 40. Over the next few years, the band racked up big hits on both side of the Atlantic, most of them written by Nash, Clarke, and Hicks: "Stop Stop Stop" in 1966, "On a Carousel," "Carrie Anne," and "King Midas in Reverse," all from 1967.

Following the Nash/Clarke collaboration "Jennifer Eccles," a hit in March of 1968, Nash grew creatively frustrated in the Hollies, finding them not suited for his new material and desiring to be solely credited for his compositions. He was also finding kindred spirits in California, particularly in the form of David Crosby and Stephen Stills. By the end of the year, Nash departed the group and officially formed a trio with this pair of folk-rockers.

Crosby, Stills & Nash released their eponymous debut in May of 1969 and it slowly became a sensation. Its singles -- Nash's "Marrakesh Express," which was rejected by the Hollies, and Stills' "Suite: Judy Blue Eyes" -- didn't crack the Billboard Top 20, but the album received strong word of mouth, working its way to number six on the Billboard Top 200 and quadruple platinum certification on its way to legendary status. As crucial as the album's commercial performance to Crosby, Stills & Nash's popularity was the group's appearance at the Woodstock Festival in August 1969. As a studio creation, CSN had yet to play live, so they decided to recruit a fourth member to help fill out the group's sound. After some negotiation, the trio agreed to bring Stills' former Buffalo Springfield sparring partner Neil Young aboard. Young played at Woodstock and recorded 1970's Déjà Vu with the group. Two of Nash's songs, "Teach Your Children" and "Our House," were chosen as singles and while neither made it onto the Billboard Top 10, they'd turn into enduring classics of the era.

Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young supported Déjà Vu with a tour in 1970, but by the time the concert souvenir Four Way Street -- a double album assembled by Nash -- appeared in 1971, the group had split due to interpersonal tensions. Nash delivered his solo debut, Songs for Beginners, an album featuring cameos by Dave Mason, Jerry Garcia, and Rita Coolidge, in May 1971. Reaching number 15 on Billboard's Top 200 and eventually going gold, Songs for Beginners was the most successful of Nash's solo albums but during the '70s, he only released one other: Wild Tales, which arrived in 1973, peaking at number 34. When Crosby, Stills & Nash weren't active as a group, Nash worked in a duo with Crosby. Their first album, Graham Nash/David Crosby, appeared in 1972; it topped out at number four, earning a gold certification that first year of release.

Neil Young rejoined Crosby, Stills & Nash for a groundbreaking 1974 tour that helped push rock into sports stadiums. Once their road obligations were fulfilled, the quartet went their separate ways, with Crosby & Nash releasing two additional studio albums -- Wind on the Water (1975) and Whistling Down the Wire (1976) -- along with a live album. By the time Crosby/Nash: Live appeared in 1977, the duo patched up their relationship with Stills, and the trio put out CSN, which turned into a hit thanks in part to the number seven hit "Just a Song Before I Go." The group splintered after completing tours in 1977 and 1978, and the alliance between Crosby and Nash didn't last much longer, either, due to Crosby's increasing substance abuse problems. A fourth Crosby & Nash album turned into the third Graham Nash solo album Earth & Sky; it peaked at number 80 upon its 1980 release.

Nash and Stills planned to record their first album as a duo in 1980 but Atlantic insisted on Crosby's participation, so 1982's Daylight Again turned into a Crosby, Stills & Nash record. Thanks to a pair of hits -- Nash's "Wasted on the Way" and Stills' revision of the Curtis Brothers' "Southern Cross" -- Daylight Again turned into a success, and this time the trio were able to sustain a partnership for regular tours, a union that withstood solo projects and personal problems. As CSN toured steadily, Nash continued to pursue photography and philanthropy along with extracurricular musical projects. He joined the reunited Hollies in 1983 for the What Goes Around album and its supporting tour, then released Innocent Eyes, his fourth solo album, in 1986. Young unexpectedly returned to the fold for the 1988 American Dream album, but he refused to support the album with a tour. Crosby, Stills & Nash carried on without him, releasing Live It Up in 1990 and After the Storm in 1994, and touring annually.

CSNY reunited for 1999's Looking Forward and the band supported it with tours in 2000. The group also toured in 2002, the same year Nash revived his solo career with Songs for Survivors. Over the next decade, Nash toured with CSN while turning his attention toward archival projects, curating comprehensive box sets concerning the solo work of the trio, along with a hefty set documenting their 1974 tour. Nash published an autobiography, Wild Tales: A Rock & Roll Life, in 2013 and not long afterward, long-simmering tensions boiled over in the group. In early 2016, Nash announced he would never work with Crosby again, effectively bringing an end to CSN. This announcement coincided with the release of This Path Tonight, Nash's first album in 14 years.

In 2018, Nash issued the collection Over the Years, a sampler of his best and best-known post-Hollies recordings, which included a bonus disc of unreleased songwriting demos. In December of that year, Nash made a surprise appearance with venerable indie rockers Yo La Tengo at one of the group's Hanukkah shows. To celebrate the 50th anniversary of the release of Déjà Vu, Nash helped coordinate a 2021 expanded reissue that included enough demos, outtakes, and alternate versions to fill a three-CD and two-LP box set”.

To mark the upcoming eightieth birthday of a true legend of music, here are some tracks that Graham Nash has had a hand in. I have had to cut it down to the very best, but I would encourage people to investigate all of Nash’s brilliant from throughout the year. Ahead of his eightieth, I wanted to wish the magnificent Graham Nash…

A very happy birthday.

FEATURE: The Only One I Know: Looking Ahead to the Thirtieth Anniversary of Later... with Jools Holland

FEATURE:

 

 

The Only One I Know

PHOTO CREDIT: BBC 

Looking Ahead to the Thirtieth Anniversary of Later... with Jools Holland

___________

I know I am over eight months early…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Jools Holland and crew on the Later… with Jools Holland set (the first forty-one series of the show were filmed in Studio 1 at London's Television Centre)/PHOTO CREDIT: BBC 

when it comes to marking thirty years of one of the longest-running music T.V. shows ever. In fact, Later… with Jools Holland is the only music show on British mainstream T.V. In terms of the format where artists perform and there is this programme solely about live music, I cannot think of another one. That is quite shocking to hear in 2022! For that reason, marking thirty years of an institution is very important. The first broadcast was back on 8th October, 1992. Little did people know back then that the show would still be on air now. Before writing about why we need to give a proper celebration to Holland’s music series, here is some Wikipedia background about Later… with Jools Holland:

“Later... with Jools Holland (also known as Even Later... with Jools Holland, and previously known as Later Live... with Jools Holland and ...Later with Jools Holland) is a contemporary British music television show hosted by Jools Holland. A spin-off of The Late Show, it has been running in short series since 1992 and is now part of BBC Two's Saturday Night Music block, usually broadcast at around 10pm. The day of transmission has varied over the years, but it is usually recorded on a Tuesday for Saturday broadcast and features a mixture of both established and new musical artists, from solo performers to bands and larger ensembles.

The show is considered an institution, having notched up millions of fans around the world. It is currently broadcast in America on MTV Live (formerly known as Palladia); previously it had been shown on Ovation, BBC America, Fuse, and Dave. The Ovation and Fuse broadcasts leave out several performances (and usually one or two performers entirely) to air commercials within a one-hour timeslot. It is also shown in Australia on the UKTV channel and ABC2, in Canada on HIFI and AUX TV, in Germany on ZDFkultur, in Spain on Canal+ Xtra, in Croatia on HRT 2, in Latin America on Film&Arts and in Belgium, France, Portugal, Switzerland, and the United Arab Emirates on iConcerts HD, and in Ireland on TG4.

The 200th programme was broadcast on 1 February 2008. The 250th edition was broadcast in September 2010”.

I first saw Later… with Jools Holland in the late-‘90s. I was aware of other shows like Top of the Pops…but this programme seemed less shiny and smiley. It was a bit rawer and closer to what one would expect from a live gig. The range of guests tended to err on the cooler side – rather than the more mainstream Pop one would hear on Top of the Pops. I loved the fact Holland was there with his guests and would often play too. An amiable and knowledgeable host, it was more about the guests and them delivering a performance which was real and live. I discovered a lot of new music through the show. Whilst YouTube and other platforms have meant live performances are available freely online, there is something sad about the fact Later… with Jools Holland remains a bit of an enigma and rarity today. There have been attempts to launch similar shows over the decades. Nothing has really stuck or remained. There are some who say the show is out of touch and has been running too long without any real changes or improvements. To be fair, the format is simple and popular enough, one does not need to see the series overhauled! At a time when there are more new artists than at any other time, it is odd that there is no real attempt to add to the number of music shows on the box. I think that seeing an artist perform live and be interviewed is a great way to bond with them, and decide whether you would like to see them at a gig.

A great way of discovering some brilliant artists, Later… with Jools Holland remains essential – as it heads to the end of its third decade on our screens. There are legends and newcomers mixing on the same show. I am sure, as we get closer to its thirtieth anniversary, there will be plans for a celebration. Maybe classic performances or a special night dedicated to the series. I really love the show. If you look on the website of the show, you can see videos from artists celebrating its twenty-fifth anniversary back in 2017. It will be exciting to see what is planned this year. There is no telling how long Later… with Jools Holland will run. When the pandemic starts to ease, there will be more live performances. It will be nice to think that, before its thirtieth anniversary, we will see audience members pack into the studio (the show back to how it was pre-pandemic). I want to bring in an article from last year that argued why Jools Holland’s long-running show was one of the most important music series on the television:

“On Friday 19 February Later…with Jools Holland returned for its 57th season on BBC Two. A series well known for introducing viewers to new music as well as popular established artists, this programme is one of the only true bastions of music TV left. Running at a paltry six episodes per season and forced to air fewer live performances due to Coronavirus, Later…with Jools Holland is still going strong nonetheless. It’s essential viewing for anyone interested not only in discovering new music but in engaging with music at a level few other platforms can create.

Quirky, vibrant, and excitable, Jools Holland holds appeal for music lovers of all ages. Having watched his programmes and seen his Rhythm and Blues Orchestra live myself, I feel a particular affection with his programmes and unique style of hosting. Usually brought to us from a studio brimming with people, bands, artists, and various celebrities, the new Covid-safe format of the show is not only more intimate but more successful at introducing viewers to musicians. In the first episode of the latest season, Jools is joined by Arlo Parks for an exploration into some of her favourite ‘Later… Live’ performances and a conversational interview which introduces Parks to the audience and provides a great insight into her personal life and career in music.

Jools brings to his show a range of music that, despite its immense variety, always maintains one thing in common: unashamed love of and practice of real, live music

Music that is not in the charts relies heavily on word of mouth or simply being ‘noticed’ by potential listeners – while social media can only do so much and with little mainstream TV dedicated to live or new music, Jools Holland really stands out. The nature of more unconventional or even new music, as typically seen on ‘Later… Live’, is that it can be hard to come by. Listening to new music can be a hard and even stressful process and it can be easy to stick with what you know, maybe trying the occasional new band here or there but rarely deviating from genre or sound. However, to do this undermines the great range of music out there. Growing up, it was instilled in me that if an artist was on TV with Holland, they were one to listen to. I recommend Later…with Jools Holland not only because it introduces the viewer to new music and new sounds, but because as a programme it welcomes its viewers into a community of music which, once in, you will never leave. 

This latest episode is a demonstration of everything that is special about Later…with Jools Holland. With specially recorded performances from Sleaford Mods and Kings of Leon, Parks also selects some classic ‘Later… Live’ performances from the show’s extensive records to play. With these old performances from Radiohead, Anderson .Paak, St Vincent, Erykah Badu and Little Simz ft. Michael Kiwanuka, any first timers to the programme will have a cornucopia of sounds and new music to view. The sheer distinctiveness of the music on offer would be enough for any hipster to drone on about and certainly the range of artists and especially non-western music is impressive.

Jools brings to his show a range of music that, despite its immense variety, always maintains one thing in common: unashamed love of and practice of real, live music, demonstrable of the true skill required to maintain a career as well as integrity in such an industry. Compared to the glitzy and underwhelming performances of old episodes of Top of the Pops, ‘Later… Live’ is gritty and real. Jools Holland shows us how intelligent, complex, and familial music can be. He shows that people from any walk of life can make music and good music at that. It reminds the viewer that music is more than just the sound. The artistry, the performance, the people, and the moves all make music more than just something that is pleasing to the ear. By far one of the most beautiful and artistic things that Jools Holland does is to bring musicians together. The live performances and collaborations between artists on the show are a famed tradition, rendering Later…with Jools Holland particularly unique amongst other forms of music media”.

The deficit of music T.V. shows is glaring and troubling. I think that it is a pity man artists either have to rely on word of mouth or YouTube. There is nothing quite like watching live performances on T.V. and getting that connection with the music. At a time when many gigs are being cancelled or rescheduled, this is a good way of ensuring that live music continues. I feel that the approaching thirtieth anniversary will provide the opportunity for some real music legends to perform. Let’s hope the BBC have no plans to move or cancel Later… with Jools Holland! It is such an important series that, through the years, has seen some of the greatest artists ever perform. I will do other features about the series closer to its thirtieth anniversary in October. I wanted to write about it now, as the show has been essential through the pandemic. Whilst it hasn’t been able to operate as it usually would, there have been some great performances and episodes. Long may it reign! I shall leave things there. A BBC staple that was first shown on T.V. during a great year for music (1992), the one constant has been its genial and enthusiastic host. Jools Holland’s commitment to the series is brilliant. I think many of us would hope Later… with Jools Holland can survive for another decade at least. If it were to leave our screens, what else is there in terms of live music!? Rather than this legendary show going, I hope it inspires other series. We do not have platforms for artists new and established to perform live on T.V. Whereas established music shows like Top of the Pops and The Old Grey Whistle Test are consigned to history, Later… with Jools Holland remains strong. I hope this wonderful and must-watch show is not going anywhere…

ANYIME soon!

FEATURE: Kate Bush’s The Kick Inside at Forty-Four: A Possible Third U.K. Single: Wuthering Heights, The Man with the Child in His Eyes, Then…?

FEATURE:

 

 

Kate Bush’s The Kick Inside at Forty-Four

A Possible Third U.K. Single: Wuthering Heights, The Man with the Child in His Eyes, Then…?

___________

I am going to bring in…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in March 1978

information about the two U.K. singles that were released from Kate Bush’s amazing 1978 debut album, The Kick Inside. As the album turns forty-four on 17th February, I want to look at a subject that interests me. The two best-known songs from the album were released as U.K. singles. Wuthering Heights (20th January) and The Man with the Child in His Eyes (28th May) were very successful – Wuthering Heights is Bush’s only U.K. number one as a solo artist – and were good choices as singles. There were singles released in Japan (Moving and Them Heavy People) and Brazil (Strange Phenomena). Whilst the international singles fared well, America was a nation that didn’t connect with or buy Kate Bush’s music. It is a country that would take a long time – if it has ever done – to catch up and appreciate Bush. I can understand that Japan was a big market and, to be fair, Bush was taken to heart there. Maybe releasing the U.K. singles in Japan might have meant lower chart positions. By releasing different songs in Japan as singles, it meant more of the album was out there. I always wonder why EMI only decided to release two singles in the U.K. That was also true of the 1978’s follow-up, Lionheart. Maybe it took until Bush really started to get attention and commercial success that EMI had more faith. By 1980’s Never for Ever, there was no doubt that Bush’s music was being appreciated around the world – and, as such, more singles were released from the album.

One reason why I bring up the subject is because a third single would have meant another music video. After captivating in the videos for Wuthering Heights and The Man with the Child in His Eyes, another video would have been intriguing. A live version of Them Heavy People was released, though there were no videos made for Moving or Strange Phenomena. It might be an obvious to the question as to which song could have been the third U.K. single: one of the songs released in Japan or Brazil. In theory, that makes sense. I think that Moving and Them Heavy People are in the top five best songs from the album. Whilst there is a video for the latter, I would love to have seen what could have been created for Moving. Moving, to me, would seem like an obvious third single. I am going to select the song that I actually think should have been the third U.K. single soon. Before that, here is some information – in the form of interview snippets – where Bush talked about Wuthering Heights:

 “I wrote in my flat, sitting at the upright piano one night in March at about midnight. There was a full moon and the curtains were open, and every time I looked up for ideas, I looked at the moon. Actually, it came quite easily. I couldn't seem to get out of the chorus - it had a really circular feel to it, which is why it repeats. I had originally written something more complicated, but I couldn't link it up, so I kept the first bit and repeated it. I was really pleased, because it was the first song I had written for a while, as I'd been busy rehearsing with the KT Band.

I felt a particular want to write it, and had wanted to write it for quite a while. I remember my brother John talking about the story, but I couldn't relate to it enough. So I borrowed the book and read a few pages, picking out a few lines. So I actually wrote the song before I had read the book right through. The name Cathy helped, and made it easier to project my own feelings of want for someone so much that you hate them. I could understand how Cathy felt.

It's funny, but I heard a radio programme about a woman who was writing a book in Old English, and she found she was using words she didn't know, but when she looked them up she found they were correct. A similar thing happened with 'Wuthering Heights': I put lines in the song that I found in the book when I read it later.

I've never been to Wuthering Heights, the place, though I would like to, and someone sent me a photo of where it's supposed to be.

One thing that really pleases me is the amount of positive feedback I've had from the song, though I've heard that the Bronte Society think it's a disgrace. A lot of people have read the book because of the song and liked it, which I think is the best thing about it for me. I didn't know the book would be on the GCE syllabus in the year I had the hit, but lots of people have written to say how the song helped them. I'm really happy about that.

There are a couple of synchronicities involved with the song. When Emily Bronte wrote the book she was in the terminal stages of consumption, and I had a bad cold when I wrote the song. Also, when I was in Canada I found out that Lindsay Kemp, my dance teacher, was in town, only ten minutes away by car, so I went to see him. When I came back I had this urge to switch on the TV - it was about one in the morning - because I knew the film of Wuthering Heights would be on. I tuned in to a thirties gangster film, then flicked through the channels, playing channel roulette, until I found it. I came in at the moment Cathy was dying, so that's all I saw of the film. It was an amazing coincidence”.

I have speculated and tossed about song suggestions when it comes to that theoretical third U.K. single from The Kick Inside. I have come to a firm decision – which I shall explain and explore in a bit. Prior to that, again, here is some more information revelation. Bush talked about what influenced The Man with the Child in His Eyes:

“The inspiration for 'The Man With the Child in His Eyes' was really just a particular thing that happened when I went to the piano. The piano just started speaking to me. It was a theory that I had had for a while that I just observed in most of the men that I know: the fact that they just are little boys inside and how wonderful it is that they manage to retain this magic. I, myself, am attracted to older men, I guess, but I think that's the same with every female. I think it's a very natural, basic instinct that you look continually for your father for the rest of your life, as do men continually look for their mother in the women that they meet. I don't think we're all aware of it, but I think it is basically true. You look for that security that the opposite sex in your parenthood gave you as a child. (Self Portrait, 1978)

I just noticed that men retain a capacity to enjoy childish games throughout their lives, and women don't seem to be able to do that. ('Bird In The Bush', Ritz (UK), September 1978)

Oh, well it's something that I feel about men generally. [Looks around at cameramen] Sorry about this folks. [Cameramen laugh] That a lot of men have got a child inside them, you know I think they are more or less just grown up kids. And that it's a... [Cameramen laugh] No, no, it's a very good quality, it's really good, because a lot of women go out and get far too responsible. And it's really nice to keep that delight in wonderful things that children have. And that's what I was trying to say. That this man could communicate with a younger girl, because he's on the same level. (Swap Shop, 1979)”.

I have previously said how either Moving or Them Heavy People would seem like a likely third single choice in the U.K. Thinking deeper, I think Moving is too close in tone to The Man with the Child in His Eyes. Bush expressed desire for Them Heavy People to come out as a single. Of course, EMI wanted James and the Cold Gun to be the first single. Bush won the battle to have Wuthering Heights as that debut single. If you go for a third single, it has to be different in tone to the others. Both of the U.K. singles are from the first half of The Kick Inside (tracks five and six), so the third single should come from the second half, I feel. Although it has a similar energy to Them Heavy People, I think that Oh to Be in Love should have been the third single in the U.K. Oddly, it was the only song from The Kick Inside Bush did not perform live for 1979’s The Tour of Life. I don’t think that signals a dislike. I feel a good video concept could have come from the song. It is a cut that has a good energy and a great, soaring vocal. One of my favourite songs from The Kick Inside, it shows a different lyrics angle to the other tracks. Even though it was not a single, it was included in a four-track E.P. called 4 Sucessos, released in Brazil. Bridging a commercial sound with something distinctly that of Kate Bush, I predict Oh to Be in Love could have been a top-twenty success. It also kind of pairs nicely with Hammer Horror. The first single from her second album, Lionheart, the two have a similar sort of pace. That song was released on 27th October, 1978. Strange Phenomena (the last single from The Kick Inside) was released on 1st June, 1978. I reckon an August release of Oh to Be in Love could have worked. Although Bush was recording Lionheart in France then and may not have been able to go on Top of the Pops, she could have done some promotion.

I think there are a few songs on The Kick Inside that are overlooked. I am not sure whether Oh to Be in Love has ever been played on U.K. radio. Maybe it has, though I have not encountered that. I love some of the images Bush paints with her lyrics. This is a great example: “All the colours look brighter now/Everything they say seems to sound new/Slipping into tomorrow too quick/Yesterday always too good to forget/Stop the swing of the pendulum! Let us through!”. It is a shame that the song did not get a chance to be staged and fully brought to life. A song that seems to indicate a fear of being trapped in a bad relationship, this is a track that I have a lot of love for. Even though one cannot turn back time and make suggestions about the single releases from The Kick Inside, Oh to Be in Love would have been great after The Man with the Child in His Eyes. The three U.K. singles would have shown the full sonic, lyrical and vocal range of Bush. Perhaps EM felt that a third U.K. single would give too much away. The runaway success of Wuthering Heights took over a lot of Bush’s 1978. Maybe I will explore this concept more in a future feature: which ‘lost’ or possible singles could have been released from her studio albums, were there to be another one? It is curious to ponder. The Kick Inside is forty-four on `17th February, so I wanted to write one more feature about my favourite ever album. On an album full of great tracks, maybe the brilliant Oh to Be in Love could have been a popular single. Who knows. All I do know is that it is a track that…

PEOPLE need to listen to!

FEATURE: Groovelines: Britney Spears – Toxic

FEATURE:

 

 

Groovelines

Britney Spears – Toxic

___________

I have various features that I want to combine…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Britney Spears shot by GQ in November 2003

to tell a full story about one of the biggest songs of the ‘00s. Arguably one of Britney Spears’ finest tracks, Toxic was still sounds remarkable now! I have not heard a Pop song since that has the same sort of catchiness and hooks. Spears’ great lead vocal and an instantly addictive chorus makes Toxic a song that nobody can dislike! It is the Indian musical influences that go into Toxic that makes me most intrigued. I am going to come to an article soon that discusses that. Before that – and I will source Wikipedia a couple of times -, I did not know that Kylie Minogue was offered the song and rejected it. Given the fact Toxic was a number one hit in the U.K. and U.S., maybe this is a decision she regrets! I don’t think that Minogue has the same confidence and vocal ability of Spears. I also don’t think she would have done as good a job as Spears:

“Toxic" is a song by American singer Britney Spears from her fourth studio album, In the Zone (2003). It was written and produced by Bloodshy & Avant, with additional writing from Cathy Dennis and Henrik Jonback. Released as the second single from In the Zone, the song was initially offered to Kylie Minogue for her album Body Language, but she turned it down. After trying to choose between "(I Got That) Boom Boom" and "Outrageous" to be the second single, Spears selected "Toxic" instead. A dance-pop and techno-pop song with elements of bhangra music, "Toxic" features varied instrumentation, such as drums, synthesizers and surf guitar. It is accompanied by high-pitched Bollywood strings, sampled from Lata Mangeshkar and S. P. Balasubrahmanyam's "Tere Mere Beech Mein" (1981), and breathy vocals. Its lyrics draw an extended metaphor of a lover as a dangerous yet addictive drug”.

Released as a single on 12th January, 2004, Toxic recently celebrated its eighteenth birthday. As Spears has endured a bad time recently (and for many years in fact!) and is rumoured to be writing a book and looking to a brighter future, I hope that recording an album is part of her plans. Her most recent album, Glory, was released in 2016. I feel a future album could be among her most revealing, honest and explosive. One of the great things about Toxic is that it is fun and sees Spears completely in control. As this article explains, Toxic could have ended up with other artists. They spoke with one of its writers, Cathy Dennis, who reveals which American icon she had in mind when writing:

“Cathy Dennis is a professional songwriter. She’s co-written hits such as Kylie Minogue’s “Can’t Get You Out of My Head” and “I Kissed a Girl” by Katy Perry, as well as lesser-known songs by Kelly Clarkson, Adam Lambert, and the Jonas Brothers. “[‘Toxic’] was written in Sweden with Bloodshy & Avant [Christian Karlsson and Pontus Winnberg] and Henrik Jonback,” she told Ivors Academy.

“I went over there to write with Janet Jackson in mind,” she said. “I was there for about 10 days in total. I’d had a meeting with Janet, I think in London, but it may have been in New York. I thought I’d have a go at writing something that would work for her and it didn’t come out at the time.

“We did have this song ‘Toxic,’ though,” Dennis continued. “It was started on day one of seven … then took part of day two to try to finish it. And because I couldn’t quite finish it, I said: ‘Look, let’s start on something else.’ So we wrote another three songs that week and in my spare time while I was in my hotel room I was very busy editing my lyrics on ‘Toxic”.

“Toxic” became a massive hit. The track peaked at No. 9 on the Billboard Hot 100, staying on the chart for 20 weeks. Its parent album, In the Zone, was a hit too. It spent 45 weeks on the Billboard 200, spending a week at the top of the chart.

“Toxic” was popular in the United Kingdom as well. The Official Charts Company reports “Toxic” spent 14 weeks on the U.K. chart, lasting one week at No. 1. Meanwhile, In the Zone hit No. 13 in the U.K. and lasted on the chart for 43 weeks. “Toxic” later appeared on Spears’ greatest hits albums Greatest Hits: My Prerogative and The Singles Collection. In the same vein, a remix of the song appeared on the album B in the Mix: The Remixes”.

Prior to ending up with some more Wikipedia information about the reception to Toxic and its legacy, there is an article from INSIDER where Meredith Geaghan-Breiner and Dilan Garcia Lopez talk about how Bollywood helped provide Britney Spears with one of her biggest hits:

“- ♪ Baby, can't you see ♪

Meredith Geaghan-Breiner: Rewind to 2003. Britney Spears hasn't had a big hit in almost four years, and critics say her career is slumping. This all would change when she dropped her song "Toxic."

♪ It's dangerous ♪ ♪ I'm falling ♪

["Tere Mere Beech Mein"]

Meredith Geaghan-Breiner: The real story behind "Toxic" begins in 1981 in India with a blockbuster Bollywood musical. Those high-pitched strings in the score? You've heard them before, at the opening of Toxic, then repeated throughout the song. It's this musical number, "Tere Mere Beech Mein," that's the source of "Toxic"'s unmistakable hook and riff and a lot of the song's intensity.

Manasi Prasad: "Tere Mere Beech Mein," it's from a classic film called "Ek Duuje Ke Liye."

Meredith Geaghan-Breiner: This is Manasi Prasad, a classical Carnatic vocalist with an encyclopedic knowledge of Indian music.

Manasi Prasad: This song is actually based on an Indian classical rāga, or melody. It's ♪ La la la ♪ ♪ La la la la la la ♪ ♪ La la ♪ So you'll find a lot of other Indian songs which are in this rāga. It's used to convey feelings of very intense emotions. I think one of the reasons why, you know, Bollywood songs work so well is the range or the pitch of the songs tends to be really high, and it brings an intensity and a brightness.

Meredith Geaghan-Breiner: Britney's team of songwriters, led by hit maker Cathy Dennis, took two tiny sections of the musical number and expertly merged those two sections together.

["Tere Mere Beech Mein"] ["Tere Mere Beech Mein"] ["Toxic"]

Adam Ragusea: There's a string hook that's got the low, fast part, which is the ♪ Bum bum ba da da da dum ba da da dum ♪ and then there's a very high keening part that goes ♪ Da da ba ♪

Meredith Geaghan-Breiner: In the movie, love is danger, and that's reflected in the music, especially in the glissandos, these sliding figures in the strings, which are pretty much the signature of "Toxic"'s sampled hook. They sound slippery and precarious, which fits since Britney's singing about slipping under and falling.

♪ It's dangerous ♪ ♪ I'm falling ♪

Meredith Geaghan-Breiner: Somehow, these notes sound even more treacherous when the sample's played backwards halfway through the track. Beyond the screechy orchestral parts borrowed from Bollywood, the other big source of danger in "Toxic" comes from the buzzing, ominous-sounding guitar.

♪ I'm addicted to you ♪ ♪ Don't you know that you're toxic ♪

♪ And I love what you do ♪ ♪ Don't you know that you're toxic ♪

Meredith Geaghan-Breiner: If that guitar bit sounds kind of old-school to you, that's because it's surf, a rock subgenre that was biggest in the late '50s and early '60s, when there was a boom of interest in West Coast wave culture”.

Alongside the great songs released in 2004, Britney Spears’ Toxic stands aside as one of the very best. It is a track that hits you the first time that you hear it. Small wonder it made such an immediate impact on critics and the public. As we can see, critics were fully behind a song that showed Spears was an artist you could never predict or write off:

“Toxic" has been met with widespread acclaim from music critics. Heather Richels of The Paly Voice complimented its hook and catchiness while deeming it the most appealing song on In the Zone. While reviewing The Onyx Hotel Tour, Pamela Sitt of The Seattle Times called it the album's strongest single. Eric Olsen of msnbc.com stated the song could be the biggest hit off of its parent album while calling it "powerfully addicting." Caryn Ganz of Spin commented, "Spears hits pay dirt on 'Toxic'". Christy Lemire of Associated Press stated it was one of Spears' greatest hits and deemed it "insanely catchy", remarking that the chorus alone "makes you want to forgive the Alias wannabe video that accompanies the song." Stephen Thomas Erlewine of Allmusic called it along with "Showdown", "irresistible ear candy in what is surely Britney's most ambitious, adventurous album to date". In a separate review of Spears' greatest hits album Greatest Hits: My Prerogative (2004), Erlewine selected it as one of the "track picks" and described it as "a delirious, intoxicating rush". Jeffrey Epstein of Out compared the innovative sound of "Toxic" to Madonna's "Vogue".

 IN THIS PHOTO: Britney Spears shot by GQ in November 2003 

Sal Cinquemani of Slant Magazine said that "Toxic" and "(I Got That) Boom Boom", "find Britney dabbling in hip-hop, but it's clear her heart lies in the clubs." Jamie Gill of Yahoo! Music Radio commented, "In the name of fairness, it will be noted that 'Toxic' and 'Showdown' could well have been good pop songs in the hands of any other singer than Spears." Joan Anderman of The Boston Globe named it "a well-titled cascade of frantic, mechanized glissandos and dreadful canned strings that buries the album's coolest (only?) chorus under a joyless mass". The song was ranked at number five in the 2004 Pazz & Jop poll by The Village Voice. "Toxic" was nominated for Best Song at the 2004 MTV Europe Music Awards, but lost to Outkast's "Hey Ya!". However, it won Best Dance Recording at the 2004 Grammy Awards, making it her first-ever won Grammy. It won Best Single at the 2004 Teen Choice Awards. Pitchfork listed the song at number three on their Top 50 Singles of 2004 list. Rob Mitchum commented that Spears "finally, she just acted like an adult, rather than constantly reminding us she wasn't a girl anymore”.

"Toxic" won Spears her first, and to date only, Grammy Award at the 2005 ceremony in the Best Dance Recording category and gained her credibility amongst critics. The song also won Most Performed Work at the 2004 Ivor Novello Awards. "Toxic" was ranked at number fourteen on Stylus Magazine's Top 50 Singles between 2000 and 2005. In a 2005 poll conducted by Sony Ericsson, "Toxic" was ranked as the world's second favorite song, only behind "We Are the Champions" by Queen. Over 700,000 people in 60 different countries cast their votes. The song was also included on The 500 Greatest Songs Since You Were Born list by Blender. Pitchfork listed the song on The Top 500 Tracks of the 2000s. Jess Harvell commented that Spears had great pop instincts and that "Toxic" showed how "Britney always had more individualist pep than her peers, important when you're dealing with steamroller productions from the mind of Max Martin”.

As the world looks ahead to see what Britney Spears releases and whether we will see new music from her in 2022, I wanted to revisit a song that all fans must include in their top five. Toxic is the standout track from the underrated In the Zone. To this day, Britney Spears’ 2004 smash remains…

ONE of the all-time great Pop tracks.

FEATURE: Paul McCartney at Eighty: One: No More Silly Love Songs – The Best of Paul McCartney

FEATURE:

 

 

Paul McCartney at Eighty

PHOTO CREDIT: Mary McCartney 

One: No More Silly Love Songs – The Best of Paul McCartney

___________

I have set myself a bit of a challenge…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Paul McCartney with The Beatles/PHOTO CREDIT: Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images

ahead of Paul McCartney’s eightieth birthday on 18th June. As he is the greatest songwriter in the world and one of the most important human beings who has ever lived, I am keen to do forty features in the run-up to that date. Among them, I will explore various albums, aspects of his career and sides of his personality. Apart from spotlighting albums, I will do rankings features and a string of interviews with various people who will discuss their love of Paul McCartney and what his music means to them. On 18th June itself, I will end with a feature about what McCartney means to me. A huge fan of The Beatles, Wings and his solo work, it is almost too hard to put into words what he means to me! To get the ball rolling, I am starting more general with an ultimate Paul McCartney playlist split into two halves – a selection of his best tracks, from The Beatles’ 1963 debut album, Please Please Me, to his latest solo album, McCartney III (2020). Before that, I want to draw in AllMusic’s detailed biography of a music pioneer and peerless genius:

“Out of all the former Beatles, Paul McCartney by far had the most successful solo career, maintaining a constant presence in the British and American charts during the 1970s and '80s. In America alone, he had nine number one singles and seven number one albums during the first 12 years of his solo career, and in his native United Kingdom, his record was nearly as impressive. McCartney's hot streak began in 1970, when he became the first Beatle to leave the group. A little more than a year after the Beatles' breakup, McCartney formed Wings with his wife Linda and Moody Blues guitarist Denny Laine, and the group remained active for the next ten years, racking up a string of hit albums, singles, and tours in the meantime. Wings disbanded in 1980, but McCartney stayed near the top of the charts over the next five years, thanks in part to a couple big duets with Michael Jackson. McCartney revived his solo career in 1989 via Flowers in the Dirt and its accompanying international tour, setting a template he would follow into the new millennium, when he'd support his records by playing concerts around the world. Between these massive endeavors, McCartney pursued other projects, including classical compositions, an electronica outfit with Youth called the Fireman, and overseeing archival projects such as the Beatles' Anthology series. As the 21st century rolled on, McCartney continued to take risks, including recording an album of standards from the Great American Songbook and collaborating with rapper Kanye West, proving that there was no area of popular music he couldn't touch.

Like John Lennon and George Harrison, McCartney began exploring creative avenues outside the Beatles during the late '60s, but where his bandmates released their own experimental records, McCartney confined himself to writing and producing for other artists, with the exception of his 1966 soundtrack to The Family Way. Following his marriage to Linda Eastman on March 12, 1969, McCartney began working at his home studio on his first solo album. He released McCartney in April 1970, two weeks before the Beatles' Let It Be was scheduled to hit the stores. Prior to the album's release, he'd announced that the Beatles were breaking up, against the wishes of the other members. As a result, the tensions between him and the other three members, particularly Harrison and Lennon, increased and he earned the ill will of many critics. Nevertheless, McCartney became a hit, spending three weeks at the top of the American charts. Early in 1971, he returned with "Another Day," which became his first hit single as a solo artist. It was followed several months later by Ram, another homemade collection, this time featuring the contributions of his wife, Linda.

By the end of 1971, the McCartneys had formed Wings, which was intended to be a full-fledged recording and touring band. Former Moody Blues guitarist Denny Laine and drummer Denny Seiwell became the group's other members, and Wings released their first album, Wild Life, in December 1971. Wild Life was greeted with poor reviews and was a relative flop. McCartney and Wings, which now featured former Grease Band guitarist Henry McCullough, spent 1972 as a working band, releasing three singles -- the protest "Give Ireland Back to the Irish," the reggae-fied "Mary Had a Little Lamb," and the rocking "Hi Hi Hi." Red Rose Speedway followed in the spring of 1973, and while it received weak reviews, it became his second American number one album. Later in 1973, Wings embarked on their first British tour, at the conclusion of which McCullough and Seiwell left the band. Prior to their departure, McCartney's theme to the James Bond movie Live and Let Die became a Top Ten hit in the U.S. and U.K. That summer, the remaining Wings proceeded to record a new album in Nigeria. Released late in 1973, Band on the Run was simultaneously McCartney's best-reviewed album and his most successful, spending four weeks at the top of the U.S. charts and eventually going triple-platinum.

Following the success of Band on the Run, McCartney formed a new version of Wings with guitarist Jimmy McCulloch and drummer Geoff Britton. The new lineup was showcased on the 1974 British single "Junior's Farm" and the 1975 hit album Venus and Mars. At the Speed of Sound followed in 1976; it was the first Wings record to feature songwriting contributions by the other bandmembers. Nevertheless, the album became a monster success on the basis of two McCartney songs, "Silly Love Songs" and "Let 'Em In." Wings supported the album with their first international tour, which broke many attendance records and was captured on the live triple-album Wings Over America (1976). After the tour was completed, Wings rested a bit during 1977, as McCartney released an instrumental version of Ram under the name Thrillington, and produced Denny Laine's solo album Holly Days. Later that year, Wings released "Mull of Kintyre," which became the biggest-selling British single of all time, selling over two million copies. Wings followed "Mull of Kintyre" with London Town in 1978, which became another platinum record. After its release, McCulloch left the band to join the re-formed Small Faces, and Wings released Back to the Egg in 1979. Though the record went platinum, it failed to produce any big hits. Early in 1980, McCartney was arrested for marijuana possession at the beginning of a Japanese tour; he was imprisoned for ten days and then released, without any charges being pressed.

Wings effectively broke up in the wake of McCartney's Japanese bust, although its official dissolution was not announced until April 27, 1981, when Denny Laine left the band. Back in England, McCartney recorded McCartney II, which was a one-man band effort like his solo debut. Ironically, the hit single associated with the album was a live take of the song "Coming Up" that had been recorded in Glasgow with Wings in December 1979 and was intended to be the B-side of the 45, with the solo studio recording as the A-side. DJs preferred the live version, however, and it went on to hit number one. Later in 1980, McCartney entered the studio with Beatles producer George Martin to make Tug of War.

Released in the spring of 1982, Tug of War received the best reviews of any McCartney record since Band on the Run and spawned the number one single with "Ebony and Ivory," a duet with Stevie Wonder that became McCartney's biggest American hit. In 1983, McCartney sang on "The Girl Is Mine," the first single from Michael Jackson's blockbuster album Thriller. In return, Jackson duetted with McCartney on "Say Say Say," the first single from McCartney's 1983 album Pipes of Peace and the last number one single of his career. The relationship between Jackson and McCartney soured considerably when Jackson bought the publishing rights to the Beatles' songs out from underneath McCartney in 1985.

McCartney directed his first feature film in 1984 with Give My Regards to Broad Street. While the soundtrack, which featured new songs and re-recorded Beatles tunes, was a hit, generating the hit single "No More Lonely Nights," the film was a flop, earning terrible reviews. The following year, he had his last American Top Ten with the theme to the Chevy Chase/Dan Aykroyd comedy Spies Like Us. Press to Play (1986) received some strong reviews but was another flop. In 1988, he recorded a collection of rock & roll oldies called Choba B CCCP for release in the U.S.S.R.; it was given official release in the U.S. and U.K. in 1991. For 1989's Flowers in the Dirt, McCartney co-wrote several songs with Elvis Costello; the pair also wrote songs for Costello's Spike, including the hit "Veronica." Flowers in the Dirt received the strongest reviews of any McCartney release since Tug of War, and was supported by an extensive international tour, which was captured on the live double-album Tripping the Live Fantastic (1990). For the tour, McCartney hired guitarist Robbie McIntosh and bassist Hamish Stuart, who would form the core of his band through the remainder of the '90s.

Early in 1991, McCartney released another live album in the form of Unplugged, which was taken from his appearance on MTV's acoustic concert program of the same name; it was the first Unplugged album to be released. Later that year, he unveiled Liverpool Oratorio, his first classical work. Another pop album, Off the Ground, followed in 1993, but failed to generate any big hits, despite McCartney's successful supporting tour. Following the completion of the New World tour, he released another live album, Paul Is Live, in December 1993. In 1994, he released an ambient techno album under the pseudonym the Fireman. McCartney premiered his second classical piece, The Leaf, early in 1995 and then began hosting a Westwood One radio series called Oobu Joobu. But his primary activity in 1995, as well as 1996, was the Beatles' Anthology, which encompassed a lengthy video documentary of the band and the multi-volume release of Beatles outtakes and rarities. After Anthology was completed, he released Flaming Pie in summer 1997. A low-key, largely acoustic affair that had some of the same charm of his debut, Flaming Pie was given the strongest reviews McCartney had received in years and was a modest commercial success, debuting at number two on the U.S. and U.K. charts; it was his highest American chart placing since he left the Beatles. Flaming Pie certainly benefited from the success of Anthology, as did McCartney himself -- only a few months before the release of the album in 1997, he received a Knighthood.

On April 17, 1998, Linda McCartney died after a three-year struggle with breast cancer. A grieving Paul kept a low profile in the months to follow, but finally returned in fall 1999 with Run Devil Run, a collection that primarily included cover songs. The electronica-based Liverpool Sound Collage followed a year later, and the pop album Driving Rain -- a successor, of sorts, to Flaming Pie -- came a year after that. The live album Back in the U.S. appeared in America in 2002 with the slightly different international edition, Back in the World, following soon after.

McCartney's next studio project included sessions with super-producer Nigel Godrich, the results of which appeared on the mellow Chaos and Creation in the Back Yard, released in late 2005. The album reached the Top Ten in more than a dozen countries, including the U.S. and U.K. McCartney performed every instrument (not including the strings) on 2007's David Kahne-produced Memory Almost Full, a bold but whimsical collection of new songs, some of which had been recorded before the Chaos and Creation in the Back Yard sessions. It too reached the Top Ten across the world. A live CD/DVD set, Good Evening New York City, appeared in 2009. The following year, McCartney kicked off an extensive reissue campaign with a box set of Band on the Run, and he supported the reissue with an American tour in the summer of 2011.

Later in 2011, McCartney released his first ballet, Ocean's Kingdom, and less than a year later followed with another first -- his first collection of pre-WWII standards. The latter work, titled Kisses on the Bottom, topped the U.S. jazz charts and reached the Top Five in seven different countries. His busy year continued during the summer, when he ended the opening ceremony of London's 2012 Olympics with a set that included a customary extended version of "Hey Jude." A surprising cap to 2012 came that December when he appeared on-stage with the surviving ex-members of Nirvana as part of a benefit concert for victims of Hurricane Sandy.

The year 2013 brought recording sessions with four of McCartney's favorite producers: Paul Epworth, Ethan Johns, Giles Martin, and Mark Ronson. His initial intention had been to hold trial sessions with each producer, aiming to select one of them to oversee the whole of his next album. However, each of them had a hand in producing New, his first album of original material in six years, which appeared that October. New debuted in the Top Ten in more than a dozen countries and McCartney supported the album over the next two years with a series of international tours. In 2015, he continued his ongoing Paul McCartney Archive Collection with deluxe reissues of Tug of War and Pipes of Peace. The next summer, he released Pure McCartney, a personally curated overview of his solo career available in two separate incarnations: a double-disc set and a four-disc box. Flowers in the Dirt arrived in early 2017 as part of the singer's Archive Collection. In September 2018, he delivered the Greg Kurstin-produced Egypt Station, his 17th solo album; it was preceded by the singles "I Don't Know," "Come on to Me," and "Fuh You." Egypt Station became McCartney's first number one album in the U.S. since Tug of War; in the U.K. it debuted at three.

A couple of non-LP tracks from the Egypt Station sessions appeared in 2019, then McCartney released an Archive edition of Flaming Pie in July 2020. The bigger news for 2020 was the recording and release of McCartney III, an album McCartney wrote and recorded on his own during the global lockdown of 2020. McCartney III appeared on December 18, 2020, giving McCartney his first number one album in the U.K. since Flowers in the Dirt; it debuted at two in the U.S. and spawned a 2021 album of "reinterpretations, remixes, and covers" called McCartney III Imagined”.

Ahead of Paul McCartney’s eightieth birthday, there will be features and planned celebrations. I am excited to see how the world marks the eightieth of a master. I wanted to do my bit and string features together that covers so many sides of McCartney. Starting off with some biography and a couple of playlists, I hope that the song selection below satisfies your hunger. From his wonderful work with The Beatles to his amazing (and sometimes divisive) solo work, these are the ultimate cuts from…

A songwriter with no equals.

FEATURE: A Great Array of Stunning Talent… The Great Escape 2022 Playlist

FEATURE:

 

 

A Great Array of Stunning Talent…

The Great Escape 2022 Playlist

______________

 

IT is the time of the year…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Baby Queen

when festivals start to announce their line-ups. Luckily, it seems like many are in a confident position to go ahead this year. One of the most interesting festivals is The Great Escape. Based in Brighton, its biggest strength is the bill. So much great new and rising talent sit alongside one another across so many different styles and scenes. This year’s announcement and line-up is among the most exciting and golden yet:

“The Great Escape 2022 line up is getting bigger and better, with 100 artists added to the bill. Featuring some of the most exciting names in the world of new music, we’ll be joined in Brighton this May by the likes of Yard Act, Lola Young, The Amazons, Crawlers, Rebecca Black and more!

From the UK live return of American queer hyperpop artist Rebecca Black, to rock riffs and licks from Reading’s The Amazons, The Great Escape 2022 line-up champions upcoming talent from a wide variety of genres. Artists announced include Gen Z grunge pop singer Baby Queen, observational and acerbic post punk from Leeds’ Yard Act, post-punk poet Sinead O’Brien, TikTok star-turned-solo musician Abby Roberts, Scottish singer-songwriter Dylan Fraser, rising star Lola Young, American singer-songwriter Indigo De Souza, Liverpool alt rockers Crawlers, Irish rapper Malaki, Belfast post-punk rockers Enola Gay, folk-rock singer-songwriter Madison Cunningham and many many more incredible artists.

The Great Escape will make it’s long awaited return on May 11th – 14th. With more than 250 acts still to be announced, there’s much more to come for The Great Escape 2022.

3 days festival tickets are available now. Secure your spot with us this May by snapping up your tickets here!

See the full list of new line up additions below:

ABBY ROBERTS / ALEX AMOR / AZURE RYDER / BABY QUEEN / BAD WAITRESS / BALIMAYA PROJECT / BALMING TIGER / BANKS ARCADE / BLAIR DAVIE / BLEACH LAB /  BONNIE KEMPLAY / BRYAN’S MUSIC TEARS / BUDJERAH / CAT BURNS / CHRISTIAN LEE HUSTON / COACH PARTY / COCO AND THE LOST / CRAWLERS / DAMOS ROOM / DEAD PONY / DOWNTOWN KAYOTO / DYLAN FRASER / ELI SMART / ENGLISH TEACHER / ENOLA GAY / FITZROY HOLT / FRANKIE BEETLESTONE / GEN & THE DEGENERATES / GRACE CUMMINGS / GROVE / HMD / HONEYGLAZE / ILLUMINATI HOTTIES / INDIGO DE SOUZA/ IRIS GOLD / JOE & THE SHITBOYS / JOY ANONYMOUS / KATHLEEN FRANCES / KATHRYN JOSEPH / KATY J PEASON / KIDDUS / KINGS ELLIOT / KYNSY / L’OBJECTIF / LITTLE QUIRKS / LOCK-IN / LOKOY / LUCY GOOCH / LUCY MCWILLIAMS / MADI SASKIA /MADISON CUNNINGHAM / MALAKI /  MARGO CILKER / MARIA BC / MARK CAKE / MATTIEL / MEGAN WYN / MEMES / MICKEY CASLLISTO / MURMAN TSULADZE / NEONE THE WONDERER / NUTRIBE / ORIONS BELTE / PANIC SHACK / PHOEBE GREEN / PIRI & TOMMY VILLIERS / PIXEY / PLUMM / PORCHES / PORCHLIGHT / PORTRON PORTRON LOPEZ / POUTYFACE / PRIMA QUEEN / QUINZEQUINZE / REBECCA BLACK / ROLLA / SAD BOYS CLUB / SHAKIRA ALLEYNE / SINEAD O’BRIEN / SOFT CULT / SOFY / SPRINTS / SWIM SCHOOL / TAAHLIAH / TAMZENE / TEAM PICTURE / THE AMAZONS / THE BOBBY TENDERLOIN UNIVERSE / THE BYKER GROVE FAN CLUB / THE GOA EXPRESS / THE LET GO / THE SHAKES / THE VANNS / TOMMY LEFROY / ULTRA Q / VLURE / YARD ACT

You can see the full line up for The Great Escape 2022 so far here

Also announced today is The Road To The Great Escape. Join us in Glasgow and Dublin for a series of live music showcases in the lead up to the return of TGE in Brighton this May. Find out more about The Road To The Great Escape here”.

Because the names were announced today, this playlist is a song from those on the bill. If you are able to go along, you will be treated to so much terrific music! Not only are there are a few more established acts; there are some artists coming through that many might not have seen live or know too much about. The Great Escape is one of the U.K.’s best and most varied festivals. On the line-up this year are some…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Cat Burns

MAJOR artists of the future.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Mia Rodriguez

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

 Mia Rodriguez

___________

MY next Spotlight feature will include a band…

but, on this outing, I wanted to focus on another great Pop artists who is primed for great things through this year. Mia Rodriguez is a Sydney-born nineteen-year-old who started her career posting covers and other content on TikTok. She started releasing music in 2019. The past year or so has seen quite a few young and original Pop artists break through. I think that Rodriguez is among the most promising and interesting. At the moment Rodriguez has released a series of singles. I think that we will see at least one E.P. this year. I have seen Rodriguez mentioned as one of the names to look out for this year. If you have not discovered her music yet, then have a look and listen. She is an artist that we will hear a lot more from in the years to come. I want to source a few interviews with the wonderful Australian artist. In June, Rolling Stone Australia spoke with Mia Rodriguez about her path into music. It is interesting reading how social media platforms, TikTok especially, has been responsible for Rodriguez becoming better known and getting her music to a massive audience:

“The 18 year old from Western Sydney was a star in her own right before landing a record deal that now sees her represented by City Pop Records in Australia, and Atlantic Records globally. To her fiercely engaged TikTok army that’s surpassed two million, the teenager was just ‘Mia’ when she made her debut a few years ago.

Jumping on board back when TikTok was the App Formerly Known As Musical.ly, Rodriguez became part of a new generation of content creators who were producing material for an audience who remained hungry. Moreover, they were constantly switched on. There’s no better way to build and curry favour with a fanbase than by being hyper accessible, and it was online on this platform that Rodriguez found her tribe.

It wasn’t a smooth journey, though. Like many young people growing up in an, let’s be honest, unforgiving digital age, Rodriguez experienced a severe level of bullying through her childhood and teen years. The years where we’re supposed to be experimenting, discovering our identities and flourishing were, for Rodriguez, spent being mercilessly mocked and denigrated, just because she was different – proudly so.

Propelling herself from YouTube to TikTok, the momentum for Rodriguez as a creator and musician picked up swiftly. From the beginning, Rodriguez has been driven by a desire to inspire others; to influence others who may feel like outsiders to embrace their uniqueness.

Her music, blending pop and electronic vibes together seamlessly, fits under the umbrella artists like Billie Eilish made a global sensation over. Rodriguez’s vocals, flitting between coquettish and powerfully dynamic, reflect the empowered youth of today. They’re ready to rail against convention, but relish their journey of self-discovery at the same time.

With over 11 million streams on her single ‘Psycho’ alone, Rodriguez is still gearing up: we’re only just witnessing her ascent. Recently, her successes were acknowledged and celebrated at the Rolling Stone Awards where she was named Best New Artist. As the accolades and achievements continue to come in, Rodriguez is still mildly bemused that all of this is happening to her.

She owes her career to social media and TikTok, this she can admit, but of course – you’ve got to have the personality and core talent to flip streaming and follower success into an actual sustainable career. Rodriguez has already proven she’s got what it takes to take this thing a long way.

“[When] I started putting covers out there, I was like, ‘This could get me somewhere because I really love to sing, and I’d really like to do that as my career’. I was so fortunate to have been found and then signed by City Pop Records, which is crazy. I did not expect it to happen that fast. And then I got signed to Atlantic Records, which is also really insane.”

“It’s been so much fun, I’ve had so many opportunities. I’d had the chance to move out…growing up, my family didn’t have much money at all, so moving out at 18 was super huge to me. Being able to support myself was also crazy, just off of expressing myself”.

One of the biggest Pop singles of last year came in the form of Billion Dollar Birch. With its evocative and striking music video, it is the most confident release so far from Mia Rodriguez. I am going to bring in other interviews around the release of that track. Women in Pop featured Rodriguez back in September. They asked about music during her childhood, in addition to her thoughts on gender inequality in the industry:

“And what steps did you take to get to that break through moment - was a music career always on the cards for you or did it develop more spontaneously?

I actually worked my way up from starting on TikTok, when it was called Musical.ly at the time. It was way before the TikTok hype and I was bored… it was 2018 and the app was dead at the time so I made a couple videos hoping no one would see them ha ha. But my account pretty much exploded. I enjoyed singing too so I sung covers here and there, and boom! Record labels came swarming in, it all happened really fast and I’m still processing it.

What role did music play in your childhood, and who were your favourite artists growing up?

I absolutely loved to sing, and I’ve always had a thing for it. I was a very shy kid so I never sung in front of anyone. I would come home from school and sing karaoke before my mum got home from work! I was always peeping out the window. My favourite artists as a kid were actually stars from the Nickelodeon show Victorious, that’s where it all started for me!

The world is very slowly opening up again after the pandemic, from a creative point of view what are you looking forward to doing as we get more freedoms?

Oh my god, it makes me so excited knowing that I can finally live my life as an adult. I turned 18 and moved out into my own place during this whole pandemic, and I have never experienced the freedom of living! I’m honestly looking forward to do anything, even just seeing my friends. But especially international travel. I’m planning to go to LA soon.

The music industry has traditionally been a difficult space for women to exist in due to it being run by older, straight, white men for decades. What are your thoughts on gender equality and sexism in music?

Wow, honestly this question made me realise it was normal. I just thought I kept getting unlucky ha ha. Because of covid, I haven’t had the chance to talk to many artists at all. I’ve kinda just been rolling with everything. It is really challenging working and being surrounded with men in my field of work. I started my career in the music industry when I was a 17 year old girl, I grew up without much of a male figure in my life too. So it can be really scary. Especially because I feel misunderstood a lot of the time. I try to communicate more to women as much as possible!

What else is on the horizon for for Mia Rodriguez?

I have recently made an ultimate game plan with my team, and I’m going to release quite a lot of music very soon - with music videos - so I’m really excited for that!”.

There are a couple of other interviews that I am eager to share. In this interview, Rodriguez talks more about Billion Dollar Bitch, alongside why her discovery and success through TikTok was fortuitous and a blessing:  

“Billion Dollar Bitch” comes after the TikTok trailblazer’s official signing with Atlantic Records and the success of her song “Psycho,” reaching over 9.7 million global streams. Recently named “Best New Artist” at the inaugural edition of The Sailor Jerry Rolling Stone Australia Awards, Mia Rodriguez creates quirky dark-pop that spans the divide between alternative indie and melodic mainstream styles. Inspired by a wide range of musical approaches, from K-pop to hip-hop, the 18-year-old Sydney-based singer-songwriter-musician began posting inventive videos on TikTok, quickly building a fervent fan following now exceeding two million.

Signed as the first artist to the new City Pop Records label (co-founded by legendary Australian concert promoter Michael Chugg and his business partner Andrew Stone), Rodriguez unveiled her captivating debut single, “Emotion,” in late 2019 alongside an official music video streaming now at YouTube HERE. “Psycho” followed and immediately catapulted Rodriguez to the forefront of Australia’s contemporary pop scene. A third single, “Beautiful & Bittersweet” – like both “Emotion” and “Psycho,” – dropped alongside an official video streaming now at Rodriguez’s popular YouTube channel HERE.

Among the many accolades accrued by Rodriguez in just one short year include being named by Australia’s national radio station as a “triple j Unearthed Feature Artist” as well as a prestigious “Unearthed Artist of the Year” nomination at the Australian Broadcasting Company’s annual J Awards. Rodriguez recently offered a spectacular rendition of Rex Orange County’s “Corduroy Dreams” as part of triple j’s famed “Like A Version” series, streaming HERE; the session also featured a unique live take on “Psycho,” streaming HERE.

o    You are rising in the industry as someone who blends between different genres, such as K-Pop, hip hop, pop and more things on the alternative: what are some influences and life experiences that inspired this sound?

I absolutely love anything that gives me goose bumps. Heavy sub bass, meaningful lyrics that hype me up, songs that just make you feel different. I really wanted to incorporate that into Billion Dollar Bitch, I wanted to share the adrenaline! The bass is absolutely booming in that song.

o    What got you started in the TikTok world? Tell us about the process behind your content and creation.

I downloaded it when it was called Musical.ly at the time, and the app was really dead. I downloaded it for fun and I didn’t think anyone was on it anymore. And then BAM, 100 followers a week turned into 100 thousand. I didn’t think I was that funny honestly, I was just really bored! But people liked it so I kept going. I’m just so glad I started at the beginning of the whole new TikTok wave. That was such a lucky mistake.

o    How has the pandemic affected your creative process as a musician?

Even though it ripped out my chances of performing live and touring, I’m actually pretty grateful for it. It gave me a chance to perform i front of cameras first, where I could just do over and over again until I got it right. It really helped my confidence for the days I actually do start performing live more.

o    You are about to release your latest single, “Billion Dollar Bitch.” Could you tell us a bit about the creative process behind it?

I wanted a song the gals and gays could dance to (and everyone else of course, I don’t judge). So I turned up the bass, called myself a Billion Dollar Bitch, and got my bad bitch Yung Baby Tate to rap on the track. The music video is also super weird, I can’t wait for people to see it. Surgeons pulling jewellery out of my stomach can get pretty wild.

o    How will this single influence the messages in your music in the future? When people listen to your music, what messages do you want to tell your audience, especially in this upcoming project?

I want to show people that you can achieve anything with confidence. I’ve heard so many people doubting themselves saying “I want to do acting, but I’m scared and I’m not good enough blah blah”. I pushed to get to where I am. I’ve went through bullying, rejection, being extremely shy, my parents separating, abusive relationships, living poor, dealing with panic disorder and undiagnosed ADHD my whole life until now. I want to let everyone know that life is short so act like a Billion Dollar bitch until you feel like one”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Billy Zammit

The final interview from last year that I want to source is from The Guardian. Even though Mia Rodriguez is an Australian artist, she has a definite fanbase in the U.K. I wanted to highlight this interview, as she discussed her pandemic routine, and how she feels about her generation being viewed lazy and Internet-obsessed:

“Despite beckoning stardom, Rodriguez’s typical day now involves waking up at 2pm, responding to fans on social media, playing simulation games like The Sims or Stardew Valley, chatting with friends on Discord, and crashing at 4am. Occasionally she’ll work in the studio, or perform to a small Twitch audience, but essentially she’s wallowing in the same developmental ennui as young people everywhere.

“It’s like being a teenager in an adult’s body. The whole world has been put on pause and you’re kind of just wasting away your adolescence.”

People who experienced pre-pandemic adulthood have been longing for old joys like travel, nights out and surprise encounters. But Rodriguez and her peers have had a profoundly different experience – their entire adulthoods have been shadowed by pandemic restrictions, leaving them dreaming of lives unlived.

She feels her generation is unfairly accused of laziness: simultaneously chastised for a preoccupation with life online, while being told not to take that same technology for granted.

“We don’t really have a choice – we’ve grown up with social media,” she says. “I feel older people are just like: ‘they’re complaining, they have it all, they have all this technology to keep them company’… [but] we’re doing it constantly, every day, and we can’t escape.”

So music remains her outlet. Her new video for Billion Dollar Bitch (co-written with Mad at Disney singer Salem Ilese) continues her established persona – a kind of deranged innocence on a Halloween-high, gulping down bling in place of sweets. US rapper Yung Baby Tate drops bars, while Rodriguez sings playful, self-affirming lyrics over bass and skittering snares.

“I wanted to feel like a Billion Dollar Bitch. I needed a song that can hype me and my fans up and just bring more confidence out into the world,” says Rodriguez. “I wanted to bring a really bad bitch energy to this shitty, sick world right now”.

An artist who is getting better and more memorable with every song she delivers, Mia Rodriguez is definitely someone to watch closely. I hope that she is able to perform internationally at some point this year. There will be questions as to whether we will get an E.P. soon. I suspect that she is quite keen to get one out there. With songs like Billion Dollar Bitch and Psycho out in the world, here is an artist who…

MEANS serious business.

______________

Follow Mia Rodriguez

FEATURE: The Return of the Black Eyed Boy: Texas’ White on Blonde at Twenty-Five

FEATURE:

 

 

The Return of the Black Eyed Boy

Texas’ White on Blonde at Twenty-Five

___________

THIS will be a lot shorter…

than any other album anniversary feature, as there is not a great deal online regarding Texas’ fourth studio album, White on Blonde. The Glasgow band, I feel, reached a commercial and creative peak on White on Blonde. Released on 3rd February, 1997, it is hard to think that the album is twenty-five very soon! It was one of those albums I remember buying when I was a teenager. Led by the captivating and hugely powerful presence of Sharleen Spiteri, the band  (Ally McErlaine – guitar, Johnny McElhone – bass guitar, Eddie Campbell – keyboards, vocals, and Richard Hynd – drums) are so strong and connected throughout. Singles like Say What You Want and Black Eyed Boy are among the most notable and memorable of the 1990s. Though Texas’ fifth album, The Hush (1999), was another cracker, I think their finest work is White on Blonde. A chart success around the world, it would be interesting to find more interviews and archive reviews from 1997. I know that there was a lot of praise for White on Blonde at the time. On its twenty-fifth anniversary, I hope that the band are able to look back fondly on an incredible album. Prior to continuing on, this Wikipedia article gives us some idea of the success that was afforded to White on Blonde:

“The album includes five UK Top Ten singles: "Say What You Want" (UK No. 3), "Halo" (UK No. 10), "Black Eyed Boy" (UK No. 5), "Put Your Arms Around Me" (UK No. 10) and "Insane" (UK No. 4), the latter released as a double A-sided single with "Say What You Want (All Day, Every Day)", a new version of the 1997 hit featuring additional rap vocals by the Wu-Tang Clan.

White on Blonde has been certified 6x Platinum in the UK, which indicates sales of over 1.8 million copies in that territory. The album was also a major success in various European countries, such as France where it peaked at #2 on the French Album Charts. The album was produced by the band themselves, along with Mike Hedges and former Eurythmics star Dave Stewart.

Honours

White on Blonde has received many honours since its release in 1997. It was voted the 86th greatest album of all time by Q magazine readers in 1998. The album is also ranked #34 in Q's "Best 50 Albums of Q's Lifetime," included in Q magazine's "90 Best Albums of the 1990s," and included in Q magazine's "50 Best Albums of 1997."

White on Blonde became the first Texas album to top the UK Album Charts and is one of only two Texas albums (along with The Greatest Hits) to be certified 6x Platinum in the United Kingdom.

In 2010, White on Blonde was nominated in the BRIT Awards Best Album in the past 25 years.

On the other hand, White on Blonde was voted the worst Scottish album ever in a 2007 online poll of music fans”.

Some say 1997 was the best year ever for British music. There is some truth in that. With classic albums from Blur (Blur) and Radiohead (OK Computer) coming later in the year, there was definitely some massive movement and wave of timeless albums. Not similar to Britpop at the time or the likes of Blur and Radiohead, Texas created their own sound and niche. White on Blonde is a definitely classic that is packed with tracks that will be played for years. Alongside the singles are terrific deep cuts such as White on Blonde (the album and its title cut are a nod to Bob Dylan’s Blonde on Blonde) and Ticket to Lie (I suspect, a nod to The Beatles’ Ticket to Ride). Prior to rounding off and saluting a brilliant album that saw Texas ascend to new heights of acclaim and success, this article from last year discussed Texas’ commercial comeback with White on Blonde:  

“The 2017 release of Jump On Board, the ninth studio album by Texas, continued the long-running adventures of the Scottish pop-rock band. One of the most memorable occurred on February 15, 1997, when they went to the top of the UK album chart for the first time, with White On Blonde.

It had been a long road to the summit for the band fronted by Sharleen Spiteri, coming nearly eight years since their first album chart appearance in the UK with Southside, in 1989. It was also a dramatic comeback in commercial terms. That debut album, which reached No.3, contained the No.8 hit single “I Don’t Want A Lover,” but ten subsequent chart singles had all peaked below the Top 10, as did the albums Mothers Heaven and Ricks Road. So the stakes were high for White On Blonde, and Texas delivered – to the tune of six-times platinum.

The album got off to a hot start early in the new year of 1997 when “Say What You Want” became a No.3 smash, still the biggest of the band’s career. That created the momentum for the album to crash into the chart at No.1, where it spent a week, returning to the top for another week in August, by which time it had two more top ten hits on it, in “Halo” and “Black Eyed Boy.”

They were far from done even then, as the album was certified for UK shipments alone of 1.8 million copies (it was also platinum in France and Switzerland) and ended with an extraordinary tally of five Top 10 singles. “Put Your Arms Around Me” and “Insane” both made that grade, the latter accompanied by a remix of the initial hit, now renamed “Say What You Want (All Day Every Day).”

“It’s our time now,” Spiteri proudly told Q magazine in the summer of 1997. “When our first album, Southside came out, the record company said, ‘She’s the girl, let’s plaster her face everywhere.’ I wasn’t ready. Now it’s not their decision, and I am ready. We all knew we couldn’t just go to the studio and say ‘Here we go again.’ I never gave up, because I knew we could make a great record”.

One of those albums that everyone knows about and can connect with the songs, I am glad that Texas are still going. They have released great albums since 1997, though I think White on Blonde is their crowning achievement. The band are terrific throughout White on Blonde, though I keep coming back to Sharleen Spiteri and her stunning voice. One of the very best band leaders I have heard, I wanted to mark the upcoming anniversary of Texas’ wonderful fourth studio album. I listen to White on Blonde quite a bit, and it still sounds essential, fresh and highly nuanced…

AFTER twenty-five years.

FEATURE: Revisiting… Kinlaw – The Tipping Scale

FEATURE:

Revisiting…

Kinlaw – The Tipping Scale

___________

THIS feature…

is normally about albums from the last few years that are either underrated or have not been played a lot recently. For the next few parts, I am looking back at albums from last year that some missed out on and were not reviewed widely. Not on everyone’s radar was the debut album from Kinlaw. The Tipping Scale was released back in February. Available on vinyl, this is how Rough Trade describe an exceptional album from a very compelling artist:

“Recommended If You Like: Choir Boy, Jenny Hval, Kate Bush, Boy Harsher, Caroline Polachek, Black Marble, Julia Holter, Grouper, Pop. The Tipping Scale is the definition of dark pop - it’s an epiphany in a public space and an unraveling on the dance floor. Kinlaw’s unstoppable singing will guide you through an introspective and very strange dance party, complete with synths, whispers, and high energy beats. A deafening debut, these are songs to move your body to.

Kinlaw is a smart, conceptual writer, one not afraid to explore deep emotions like loss, regret, and confusion. She explains that The Tipping Scale is an ideal metaphor for the record, the idea of an ever-present slipping in and out of change and acceptance. Kinlaw is a composer, choreographer, and artist focusing on empathic potential and agency developed by performance through audio, dance, and sculptural installation. Known for solo works and productions, she studies themes of power, memory, trauma, and connection. Her performances have been featured in institutions like MoMA and MoMA PS1”.

The Tipping Scale is an album that I only found a few weeks back. I have been listening to it since. I have been struck by the power of her voice, in addition to the incredible music videos. Prior to coming to a couple of reviews for The Tipping Scale, I want to bring in a review from November 2020. Them. introduced us to a the queer performance artist who was brewing and building this amazing album - one that a lot more people should be conscious of:

“The North Carolina-born artist is upbeat, even, as she tells the story of how it happened: While having a “confident morning” over at her sister’s studio in Bushwick, she picked up a Roomba (one of those robot vacuums) the wrong way and dropped it on her foot. She pantomimes the whole incident with her slender fingers, which flit gracefully through the air throughout our entire conversation as an instinctual part of the way she communicates. “This is not a big deal, it will heal,” she tells them. “If I have the chance — while it’s healing and getting stronger — to work with what I have, I will do that, because that's what I've always done.”

Rising out of disaster and trauma also happens to be the focus of Kinlaw’s new music video for her single “Permissions,” taken from her forthcoming debut solo album The Tipping Scale, out January 22 via Bayonet. The visual, directed by close collaborator Kathleen Dycaico, sees Kinlaw emerging bloody and bruised from a devastating car crash. While she tries to regain composure, a few people descend upon the scene to dance and take pictures. One couple begins kissing right next to the wreckage, while a news anchor grabs Kinlaw to ask her what happened, although she’s visibly dazed.

What was the start of your artistic journey? Where were you physically? What inspired you?

I'm gonna bring it way back to seven years old. I had been singing privately, and I don't really think anyone from my family knew that I sang yet. My aunt brought me to sing for a musical, Charlie Brown. I think I was auditioning as Snoopy, because I was so small. I started singing, and I distinctly remember my aunt turned around and her eyes were all big. The pianist turned around and their eyes were big. I was just like, “Damn, they're really listening.” I talked earlier about communication and exchange, and songs being kind of like a bridge, that connection with others. So I'd say it started the first moment I saw someone pay attention.

How do you think your queer identity informs your work?

Well, it both builds my heart and breaks it every day. It does. What growing and maturing does for some of us is, we start to feel like there is no separation between queer identity and just identity. For me, when that bonds together, you get in a place where you can really honor yourself and your needs. I don't feel like I need to separate it.

What advice would you give to people who might want to use movement in order to cope with the stress of the world today?

First of all, I’m no doctor. Yeah, not a doctor yet. But we really can regulate our own physiology, by the way that we move. To move through this great time of despair and difficulty with COVID, with Trump, with the things that come to us in the daily... The way I see it, the best way that we can work through this and with it is through reactivation of our bodies. We do that by letting ourselves move around, vocalize, and speak. Empower yourself through movement and surround yourself with a community of people who believe in curiosity and who believe in empowering you”.

I am including quite a few words when it comes to Kinlaw and The Tipping Scale. It is a fantastic release that ranks alongside the most underrated of last year. Although not every review was glowing, there were a lot of positives from critics. This is an album that needs several listens so you can absorb it. Audiofemme gave their thoughts about The Tipping Scale in February:

“As an artist whose primary medium is choreography, it comes as no surprise that Kinlaw’s process for writing this record was anything but orthodox, beginning with mere movement. “Years ago, working with a band, [songwriting] would start with someone having an idea and then suddenly there’d be a lot of sound, and quite a lot of noise, and then [we’d] kind of shape it down,” she explains. Their songwriting process as a solo artist happens nearly in reverse. “The entry point for a lot of these is really super quiet,” they explain. “I would start with a gesture, and let it build until a memory attached itself to it.” Different gestures intuit different sounds, associating smoother gestures with vowel sounds and those that were more “crinkled and quick” with consonants. “It’s all just a huge trip but it works for me,” she says. “It makes it so I don’t feel intimidated by the songwriting process. It makes it so that I feel like I’m making material that feels of the moment to me.”

The depth of The Tipping Scale is such that it’s difficult to articulate in words; Kinlaw refers to it as “an introspective and very strange dance party.” Wrapped in pop music that is both accessible but somehow wholly original, it combines lyrics deeply personal to Kinlaw with universal themes like loss, regret, identity, and more than anything else, change. The title itself is a metaphor for change, the idea of an ever-present slipping in and out of change, and the acceptance of it, what they describe as a constant “pull-tug” between past and present versions of ourselves. The songs are fluid, ripe with meaning never meant to sit stagnant, but rather to evolve with the listener and their environment.

For instance, Kinlaw says, “What I might have written ‘Blindspot’ about initially, is not always what it’s going to continue to be.” The video for this track was directed by her dear friend Kathleen Dycaico, who provided a mirror to reflect these ever-changing meanings. “I think working with Kathleen was a really really great thing for me, because I’m able to see that the relationships I have with other people so often parallel the ones I have with myself,” Kinlaw says. “And so even the difficulties or the grief, or the loss or the frustrations I have with things, relationships that have died, I can see them mirrored so clearly in so many things I experience on my own, with myself.”

Change is a strong theme on the album, but also configured heavily into how Kinlaw has released and promoted it; the events of the past year altered their intentions regarding The Tipping Scale. She began filming the visual component as an alternative to the live performance it was supposed to be, and the realization that a performance would not happen as soon as she had hoped. “People who were part of the developmental phases, I told them the album was a script. And that really for me, the reason I was doing it was so I could create a live show in accordance with the script,” she explains. “So for me to make a record was a really exciting thing because, like, how fabulous to have a new starting point to spend a lot of time and consideration on these songs and to allow them to have another phase, like when you do the performance.”

While I have no doubt that whatever live performance Kinlaw would have crafted (and will certainly craft, once we’re allowed live performance again) would have been powerful in its own right, I would argue that the transition to produced videos has opened up a previously unimaginable realm of possibilities for these songs. The medium provides her a vehicle to really delve into the meaning of change, the different characters she portrays and the different worlds she inhabits. Like Kinlaw says, “Music videos are great – you could do anything in three to four minutes. Whatever world you say, then that’s the way it’s gonna be.”

As a visual metaphor, hair factors strongly into these videos, changing from track to track and sometimes in the middle of the video. In “Permissions,” they crawl from a wrecked vehicle in a choppy red wig. In “Blindspot,” she and her childish counterpart begin with sleek ponytails before they take turns chopping at each other’s thick blonde braids, until Kinlaw emerges with her hair curled. In “Haircut,” her hair remains natural, but they articulate this sentiment in lyrics: “There’s a rule/That when you cut off your hair/You let the old things go.”

The strong imagery resonates with anyone who ever got a new haircut in the midst of a bad break-up, or hacked some ill-advised bangs with a pair of craft scissors on some uneventful childhood afternoon. “I think it brings to mind a lot of the symbolic ways that we try to cope as people, and it’s been interesting, since writing [‘Haircut’] and talking about it with some folks,” they say. “It’s been really interesting to see people be like, ‘Oh yeah, I totally get it,’ and they’ll tell me a story: ‘Oh I chopped off my hair that one time in like 2005, I was so upset’… I guess it’s just like identity, and an extension of, and memories. I’m also really quite stubborn with my hair, like I refuse to cut it for long stretches of time.” This last statement is thick with irony, given the artist’s dynamism and penchant for constant reinvention.

Reinvention can surely be at least partially attributed to Kinlaw’s commitment to a rigid therapy practice. I felt it reductive to ask an artist of Kinlaw’s caliber who her sonic influences were in the creation of The Tipping Scale, and I told her so when I asked, to which they unsurprisingly responded, “I can honestly say I don’t [have any].” Rather, warning that what she would say might be construed as “cheeseball,” she listed therapy as their greatest influence in the writing of this album, particularly EMDR therapy, which utilizes binaural sounds to create a pattern of eye movements and from that, spawn memories. “That, to me, is what spawns storytelling,” they say, “understanding firsthand what the crazy connection is between a body and your thoughts, and sound, and how sound influences your body.”

Pop music can be its own kind of therapy, a means of transporting oneself across energy levels and moods, something anyone who has ever turned on Top 40 radio to dance away the blues knows well. Describing pop music as a “raft boat,” Kinlaw explains, “I purposefully chose pop music because I wanted to feel like I could move, dance, party forward into the next chapter of my life. The juxtaposition of having these confessional songs paired with pop sounds was a really strange space that I wanted to learn more about.” But did the process of setting traumatic memories to music designed to lift the mood provide therapeutic relief for the artist? “I don’t know, but it’s like I wanted to float these songs on the lens of pop because I hope it will make me feel better,” they say. “Talk to me in a year and I’ll tell you if this worked out for me or not”.

The reviews that are out there for The Tipping Scale are appropriately long and deep. It shows that those who listened have really connected with the music! I think it is an album that deserves more airplay and focus this year. Pitchfork provided their impressions on Kinlaw’s impressive debut album:

“A crucial bit of Sarah Kinlaw biography is that she’s a choreographer with an operatically trained voice. She’s become a fixture of the Brooklyn art scene; her best-known project to date is Authority Figure, an interactive dance-performance piece co-created with Monica Mirabile (of experimental dance duo FlucT with Sigrid Lauren), which cemented her as somewhat of a luminary in the milieu. Kinlaw exercised her vocals and songwriting in an art-pop band she had for many years called SOFTSPOT, with Bambara’s Blaze Bateh and Bryan Keller Jr. But when the small experimental tape label Soap Library released her 2017 debut EP as Kinlaw, a trigger for every body—which came with a lemon-jasmine aromatherapy sniffer—it was clear she was much more striking as a solo performer, her sound somewhere between Jenny Hval, FKA twigs, and Cate le Bon.

On Kinlaw’s debut album, The Tipping Scale, she’s incorporated all this experience. As any artist deeply in tune with their body, she’s clearly aware of the ways in which sound has a physical effect, as well as the many sounds our corporeal selves can produce. Kinlaw has a keen ear for texture, which grounds this record. And along with all the humming synths and stuttering beats, she stretches her vocals to great impact.

The way she refers to the creation of this record is almost philosophical: she speaks of vowels and consonants the same way she does melodies and key changes, and calls the making of The Tipping Scale a construction of gestures. She turned the writing of “Permissions” into a “game,” only allowing herself to work on it while she was physically moving: every lyric and melody written “on a bus, in the back of a car, on a plane...while walking or running.” In the song’s excellent video, directed by longtime collaborator and fellow dancer Kathleen Dycaico, she crawls from the wreck of an overturned car and bounds down the middle of the street, as though reclaiming her body, her story, her right to shift and change. This is what The Tipping Scale is about.

If The Tipping Scale is constructed of gestures, shaped and honed from spurts of sound, then it makes sense to think of it as choreography, architecture, and story, all at once. Each song feels like a room on wheels, especially “Haircut” and “Home,” the album’s softest moments, with twinkles, sighs, and echoes giving them a chamber-like quality. “Home is where we put things together,” sings Kinlaw on the latter. The concept of storytelling through the body is key. It is only through memory—intrinsically attached to bodily experience—that one can form a narrative of self. As she intones on “Oleander,” a feathery-crunchy choice cut, “This episode is a new memory collection/A tapestry/The lines weave in and through me/Remembering the time in my house.” She’s on par with Austra, a like-minded operatic synth whiz. It feels like the record’s core, especially when Kinlaw says: “I feel like I’ve got five bodies in mine.” That sense of self is in constant flux, and that’s a beautiful thing”.

A gem from 2021 that did not get as much spotlight and column inches as it deserved, I would encourage anyone to listen to the album – as it is such a moving experience. An artist who is going to put out a lot more music (I predict), I really love Kinlaw’s The Tipping Scale. It is an album that is…

UNDENIABLY incredible.

FEATURE: Will You Never Be Mine? Kate Bush and the Divide Between the U.K. and U.S. in Terms of Perception and Reputation

FEATURE:

 

 

Will You Never Be Mine?

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush performing Wow 

Kate Bush and the Divide Between the U.K. and U.S. in Terms of Perception and Reputation

___________

A subject I have covered a few times before…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in a promo photo taken during a visit to Holland in spring 1978

is how Kate Bush is received in America compared to the rest of the world. A new podcast from National Review in America is, in their own words, a chance for U.S. audiences to reappraise Kate Bush. How much is known about her there in 2022? Whilst she has a lot of American fans, do artists there follow Bush and carry her D.N.A. like they do here? I do feel that, in terms of population size, far fewer Americans know about Bush’s work. She is almost a national treasure and institute here in Britain. Before exploring this point more, here is some detail about a podcast episode that was released earlier in the month:

“Introducing the Band:

Your hosts Scot Bertram (@ScotBertram) and Jeff Blehar (@EsotericCD) are joined by Andrew Prokop. Andrew is Senior Politics Correspondent for Vox, and you can find his work here. Follow him on Twitter at @awprokop.

Andrew’s Music Pick: Kate Bush

Who? Unless you’re an art-rocker, Englishman, or Lisa Simpsonesque girl-poet-dreamer, the name “Kate Bush” quite likely means nothing to you. Bush is something close to a beloved institution in the United Kingdom, where she has grown up in public to become the nation’s officially designated Eccentric Bookish Aunt, but in the United States she is almost a pure cipher outside of music fanatics, a weird lady with a flute-like voice who occasionally shows up on ’80s-era Peter Gabriel singles.

Well get ready for a massive course-correction then, because this is an episode of Political Beats that has been brewing since the day the show began. And it doesn’t take a psychic to figure out which of your hosts has been quietly lying in wait, ready to explain the deeply committed art-rock genius of Kate Bush to you for four years now. Bush began her career as a downright creepily preternatural child prodigy (she was writing at age ten, recording by age 13, professionally recording at age 15, and released her debut LP at age 18), swiftly gathered up complete creative control into her hands, and went to work from 1980 onwards shaping a career that stands for so many things, but perhaps most of all for the miraculous idea that gallery/exhibition-level art and “pop music” can still coexist within the same skin without shedding representation altogether. Instrumentally, this is piano-based music, but the real instrument here is the Fairlight CMI, a synthesizer program set that allowed her to retreat into near-complete isolation and play every single note of any instrument herself; Bush, more than nearly any other rock or pop artist with mainstream success during the 1980s, is the sound of Virginia Woolf’s A Room Of One’s Own made good.

Ah, but it’s not just about art! It’s about love and beauty! Bush balanced all of her arty instincts with an achingly pure lyrical vision that magpied from every influence imaginable to take form in her own unique style: a literary fascination with artifice — with the self-construction that knowledge and imposture makes possible — combined with an elementally deeply fascination with men and the inscrutable mysteries of masculine anxieties, ambitions, and inchoate needs.

So here we go! It’s coming for us through the trees! Take your shoes off, throw them in the lake, click play, and before you’re 20 minutes in, hopefully you’ll be two steps on the water as well”.

I have written about America’s view of Kate Bush. I drew articles where it was noted that, as Tori Amos arrived in the 1990s and sounded a lot like Bush, the originator was not taken to heart. In 1978, when Wuthering Heights was released, it did nothing in America. There have only been a few albums and singles that have made any impact there. Hounds of Love (1985) as a commercial success, as was The Red Shoes (1993) and Aerial (2005). I don’t think America struggles to embrace anything quintessentially English or eccentric. They have adopted a lot of experimental music and Art-Rock that owes a debt to Kate Bush. Modern U.S. artists like St. Vincent definitely can be compared with Bush. Not only did I want to mention that recent podcast episode – as not many Kate Bush podcast episodes are out there -, but it does seem that there is this vacuum in the U.S. Although Bush did visit America at times through her career, she did not tour there or try to crack the country. I look on social media, and there is a lot of love from America. One of the biggest mysteries is why there is not more knowledge of Bush’s music across the American media and radio stations. The fact that National Review mention how Bush is seen as a bit of an oddity of side-act makes me think what can be done to correct that.

Podcasts are a positive and productive way to make sure that listeners know more about an artist who, in the U.K., is a massive success and is considered to be one of our best artists ever. I don’t think it is the case that, as Bush was born in the U.K., we understand her better than anyone else. America has always been a fan of British music, but there is something about Kate Bush that means she has taken longer to embed. If her ten studio albums were not huge chart successes or celebrated a tonne upon release, now is the time to think twice! Although one can hear some brand-new artists in America who are inspired by Kate Bush, there are far fewer than in the U.K. I think. I do wonder whether record shops stock her albums; whether stations play a lot of her music. One cannot imagine many deep cuts cropping up on American radio! Whilst I cannot really understand why there is not as great an understanding of Kate Bush in America as there should be, I feel the solution going forward is more exposure and re-investigation. We are long-overdue a documentary and I think, if produced by Netflix or Apple+, it would reach a lot of new fans and ears in America. There is a hangover from past years where people perceive Bush as odd; her music being strange and inaccessible. We are, perhaps, more cultured and less judgemental here. The truth is that Bush’s music is so varied, it is impossible to label it or define so easily. Nearly forty-five years since Kate Bush’s debut album came out, the U.S. does seem to be lagging behind a lot of the rest of the world when it comes to appreciation and mass digestion of all of her albums. I hope that, with people out there trying to change attitudes, we see the music and genius of Kate Bush earning…

A bigger profile in America.

FEATURE: The Act You've Known for All These Years… Fifty-Five Years Since the Recording of The Beatles’ Track, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band

FEATURE:

 

 

The Act You've Known for All These Years…

IN THIS PHOTO: The Beatles in 1967/PHOTO CREDIT: David Magnus 

Fifty-Five Years Since the Recording of The Beatles’ Track, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band

___________

MAYBE it is a strange anniversary to mark…

yet, on 1st February, 1967, The Beatles started recording the title track to their iconic album, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. One of the most important and influential albums ever, the foundations of a track which kicked off the album should be celebrated. It is almost fifty-five years since The Beatles began work on what would ignite an album that, to this day, is seen as one of their very best. Maybe the ‘concept’ of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band is quite loose. It is, in effect, The Beatles being another band. We get the title track at the top and the reprise comes before the finale, A Day in the Life. Apart from that, there is not too much linked to the themes of a fictional band. I am not sure what the concept could have been. As the theme is a band rather than a subject or event, it is hard to write songs that would form a cohesive and clear concept. Rather, The Beatles introduced themselves (Billy Shears, who was played by Ringo, then sang lead on the second track, With a Little Help from My Friends) and then we got songs from a fictional band, rather than the Liverpool foursome we knew and loved. That’s how I see it. Even though the title track is only 2:02, it is an important song in their cannon. It opens up an album that contains some of The Beatles’ very best work. I have always loved Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, as it was released during the Summer of Love (May 1967), and there is this trippy, psychedelic sound and feel. The album cover is iconic, whilst this might be the last album before Abbey Road (1969) where the band sound harmonious for the most part.

I will give further thoughts in a second. Recorded over four separate days, Beatles Bible gives us some more information and insight into a song that starts one of the greatest albums that was ever released into the world:

“Recorded: 1, 2 February; 3, 6 March 1967

Producer: George Martin

Engineer: Geoff Emerick

On The Beatles’ final US tour in 1966, Paul McCartney was struck by the inventiveness of the West Coast hippy groups, with names such as Quicksilver Messenger Service, Jefferson Airplane, and Big Brother and the Holding Company. In November that year, on a post-holiday flight from Nairobi to England, he came up with the idea of an alter-ego for the band, which would perform an entire album before an audience.

Sgt Pepper is Paul, after a trip to America and the whole West Coast, long-named group thing was coming in. You know, when people were no longer The Beatles or The Crickets – they were suddenly Fred and His Incredible Shrinking Grateful Airplanes, right? So I think he got influenced by that and came up with this idea for The Beatles. As I read the other day, he said in one of his ‘fanzine’ interviews that he was trying to put some distance between The Beatles and the public – and so there was this identity of Sgt Pepper. Intellectually, that’s the same thing he did by writing ‘He loves you’ instead of ‘I love you.’ That’s just his way of working. Sgt Pepper is called the first concept album, but it doesn’t go anywhere. All my contributions to the album have absolutely nothing to do with the idea of Sgt Pepper and his band; but it works ’cause we said it worked, and that’s how the album appeared. But it was not as put together as it sounds, except for Sgt Pepper introducing Billy Shears and the so-called reprise. Every other song could have been on any other album.

John Lennon

All We Are Saying, David Sheff

In the studio

The song ‘Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band’ was recorded over four days. On 1 February 1967 The Beatles taped nine takes of the rhythm track, though only the first and last of these were complete. They recorded drums, bass and two guitars – the latter played by Paul McCartney and George Harrison.

The next day McCartney recorded his lead vocals, and he, Harrison and John Lennon taped their harmonies. The song was then left for over a month, until the French horns were overdubbed on 3 March. McCartney also recorded a lead guitar solo, leaving the song almost complete.

On 6 March they added the sounds of the imaginary audience and the noise of an orchestra tuning up, a combination of crowd noise from a 1961 recording of the comedy show Beyond The Fringe and out-takes from the 10 February 1967 orchestral overdub session for ‘A Day In The Life’”.

Nearer to May, I will put out a feature or two regarding Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearst Club Band. I may put out a track ranking piece, as there are some definite highlights. I think that the title track is among the best five on the album. I like how Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band does not have a traditional chorus or familiar structure. It is an introduction and overview of what to expect going forward. One of the best tracks from The Beatles, I aim imagining them going into the studio on 1st February, 1967 and the seeds being planted. As the concept was McCartney’s – and he contributed most of the songs -, I can imagine that he was especially pleased and excited realising that The Beatles’ eighth studio album would be something very special indeed. Whilst many Beatles fans will argue albums such as Revolver and Abbey Road are more consistent and better, I do not think they are more era-defining and important as Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. The title track is the beginning of this imagine voyage through various scenes, moods, characters and sounds. It is hard to say how an album will sound and shape up when an artist starts work in the first days. I wonder whether The Beatles and George Martin, when they started recording the title track of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, quite knew…

WHAT was to come!