FEATURE: We’ve Got Alchemy: Impressions on Kate Bush’s Best of the Other Sides

FEATURE:

 

 

We’ve Got Alchemy

 

Impressions on Kate Bush’s Best of the Other Sides

__________

I am excited…

to get the vinyl of Kate Bush’s Best of the Other Sides on 31st October. The digital version is out now. There are not many huge surprises in terms of what is included. However, the original is one that was popular with fans when it came out in 2019 but since went out of print. Or the album wasn’t being pressed or available on streaming services. I think most of the tracks are available on YouTube, though there is demand for that original album, The Other Sides. It is good that we have a reduced version. An eleven-track release that takes the best tracks from the first album. It is wonderful that we get these songs on streaming services. I want to provide some impressions on the tracks. The tracklisting is as below:

1. Experiment IV (remastered 2025)
2. You Want Alchemy (remastered 2025)
3. Rocket Man
4. Walk Straight Down the Middle (remastered 2025)
5. The Big Sky (Meteorological 12" Mix)
6. The Man I Love
7. Under the Ivy
8. Mná Na Héireann
9. Lyra
10. Brazil (Sam Lowry's First Dream)
11. Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) 12" Mix

This is album like a studio album in itself. One that sits alone and has its own weight. The track order is key too. I love how the songs are balanced. Experiment IV appeared on Kate Bush’s greatest hits album, The Whole Story. The only single from that album is one of a few tracks from a particular time period. That was 1986. Under the Ivy is the B-side from 1985’s Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God). That was the first single from Hounds of Love. There is also a 12” mix of Running Up That Hill. Rather than placing those tracks together, they are separated. I think it works well. Opening with Experiment IV, we have this driving and percussive song. One that has a darkness and punch, it is a track many Kate Bush fans would not have heard. One of her most underrated singles, I have covered this track before.

There are a few selections from the album that I want to cover. Songs that I was not expecting to be on the Best of the Other Sides. There are a few great and classic Kate Bush covers. The Man I Love from 1994. Rocket Man from 1991. Mná Na Héireann from 1996. These are interesting. The Man I Love is a rare gem that shows Bush’s voice in smoky and seductive mood. A style and sound that sadly was not explored more. Appearing on a tribute album Originally released in 1924, it was written by George Gershwin and lyrics by his brother Ira Gershwin. Kate Bush’s version appeared on a tribute album for the Gershwins. Covers of their songs. Larry Adler played harmonica. It is a classic example of Bush’s interpretive genius and, placed between The Big Sky (Meteorological 12" Mix) and Under the Ivy, it is a 1990s track between some 1980s cuts. I am going to get to that mix of The Big Sky. However, the other covers are great. Her version of Rocket Man appeared on another tribute album. One for Elton John and Bernie Taupin. Elton John is a hero of Bush’s, so it was maybe a risk covering an Elton John song. Or a daunting task. Giving Rocket Man a different take, it is a bit Reggae and Celtic Folk. Mná Na Héireann is one of the standouts. I will highlight three other tracks, You Want Alchemy?, The Big Sky (Meteorological 12" Mix) and Brazil (Sam Lowry's First Dream).

Although the Kate Bush originals are brilliant, her cover versions are amazing. Mná Na Héireann is an amazing song that most people have not heard. Now available on streaming services and part of this incredible album, it is one of the highlights. This article from the Kate Bush Encyclopedia gives us more details. Included is some brief reaction from Kate Bush:

“Kate Bush recorded her rendition in 1995 for the 1996 compilation album Common Ground – Voices of Modern Irish Music. According to Donal Lunny, who contacted her for this contribution, ‘She was very excited with the idea of singing the Irish in a way that Irish speakers would understand, and of conveying the meaning of the song through the sounds of the words. I helped as much as I could. She had Seán Ó Sé’s recording of ‘Mná na hÉireann’ as reference. She was as faithful to the pronunciations as she could possibly be. It was with characteristic care and attention that she approached it. She did not stint one bit. Of course you’ll get people saying, `Oh, you’d know she doesn’t talk Irish straight off’. You wouldn’t know it straight off. I would defend her efforts as being totally sincere. No matter how perfect she gets it, she’s not an Irish speaker. This may rankle with some people.’

The track was reviewed as ‘impressive’ by Hot Press, saying that Kate’s ‘fiery interpretation….may well prove to be among the most controversial cuts on Common Ground’. Indeed the Irish Times review of Common Ground singled out Kate as ‘fumbling her way through’ the song. NME was more positive about the track: “Since Lunny made a significant mark on her ‘Sensual World’ album, she repays him with a swooning version of ‘Mná na hÉireann’ (Women Of Ireland) that’s as good as anything she’s done this decade.”
Kate about ‘Mná na hÉireann’

It was fun and very challenging …..I will eagerly await comments from all Irish-speaking listeners in particular. I’m sure Ma gave me a helping hand!

Kate Bush Club Newsletter, December 1995

Donal Lunny about ‘Mná na hÉirann’

Not being an Irish speaker, she had to learn the words phonetically and took enormous pains over that. We exchanged, at the time I think it was faxes, of phonetic versions of it and spoke over the phone, went over the pronunciations, and eventually she got it pretty well.

Kate Bush sings as Gaeilge – Donal Lunny on working with a legend, RTÉ Radio 1 (Ireland), 4 September 2020”.

I am surprised Lyra is among the eleven from Best of the Other Sides. Included on the soundtrack for the 2007 film, The Golden Compass, it is not considered one of her best songs. Although it a song that appears on a film soundtrack and was released in the 2000s, perhaps fans would have preferred something different from The Other Sides. I love how Walk Straight Down the Middle is included. The B-side from The Sensual World’s title track, that song was also included as a bonus track on the tape and C.D. versions of the album. That was released in 1989. It is a curious song that Bush was not a huge fan of. Perhaps seeing it as more throwaway, she said in a 1989 interview: “It’s a bit less worked on than the other tracks. It’s about try not to get caught up in extremes. My mother was down the garden when the funny bits at the end were being played. She rushed in and said she’d heard some peacocks in the garden! How sweet! I can’t take the song seriously now”. You Want Alchemy? is another one of those Kate Bush songs that many fans do not know. It was written and recorded after the completion of 1993’s The Red Shoes and the short film, The Line, the Cross and the Curve. Kate Bush provided some new commentary on the song on her website when promoting The Best of the Other Sides. In the lyrics, Bush references Hound of Love’s Cloudbusting and The Beatles Magical Mystery Tour. Here is some more detail about You Want Alchemy?:

“Kate sings about meeting a beekeeper, who launches into his awe, his reverence, his love for bees, which she first responds to with ‘Is he some kind of nut, or what?’ She doesn’t get it, this fascination with bees. She seems to take a tender step into this man’s private world, to open herself and feel and respect this lonely man’s joys. She approaches with sympathy, and for a brief moment, she can share his vision, and see the alchemy. The music includes quotations of Debussy’s ‘Clair de lune’ from his ‘Suite bergamasque’.

‘You Want Alchemy?’ was meant to be one of the tracks on The Red Shoes album, but because there was already so much material, it ended up as a B Side.
I love Michael Kamen’s orchestral arrangement in this song. It really takes us to that lovely afternoon, up in the hills with the mad beekeeper.” (Kate Bush website, retrieved 22 September 2025)”

Two more tracks to discuss before moving on. The Big Sky (Meteorological 12" Mix) is my fans’ favourite. Longer than the single version, perhaps this is the superior version. This is one of the tracks that we need to preserve and have on an album. Brilliant that it is included on streaming services. It means that fans can access this wonderful mix time and time again. I do not have a lot to say about it, other than the fact that it is a great song that adds depth and layers to the original. A single released from Hounds of Love. Perhaps my favourite selection from Best of the Other Sides is Brazil (Sam Lowry's First Dream). A song I have not heard in years, I am glad that it gets an outing here. Again, this is a song from a film soundtrack. Bush, as a huge film fan, was probably offered a lot of chances to contribute to film soundtracks. This Woman’s Work, from 1989’s The Sensual World, first featured in 1988’s She’s Having a Baby. Brazil (Sam Lowry's First Dream) is rare because it was only included on a repressing of the Brazil soundtrack. It features a magnificent Kate Bush vocal and reminds me a bit of The Man I Love. In terms of the sound and vocal. Kate Bush’s recordings of the 1990s is fascinating. The Red Shoes’ production is a little tinny and lacks huge depth. However, when she was recording other projects in the 1990s, we get new sides to her voice. Brazil (Sam Lowry's First Dream) is a tremendous song:

“‘Brazil’ is the title song from the 1985 British film directed by Terry Gilliam and written by Gilliam, Charles McKeown and Tom Stoppard. Ary Barroso’s 1939 song ‘Aquarela Do Brasil’ (‘Watercolor Of Brazil’, often simply ‘Brazil’) in a version specifically performed by Geoff Muldaur is the leitmotif of the movie, although other background music is also used. Michael Kamen, who scored the film, originally recorded ‘Brazil’ with vocals by Kate Bush. This recording was not included in the actual film or the original soundtrack release; however, it has been subsequently released on re-pressings of the soundtrack.

There are actually two versions of ‘Brazil’: one was included on a 1992/1993 CD release of the soundtrack from the movie ‘Brazil’. A new version, with different vocals by Kate, was released in 1998 on the album ‘Michael Kamen’s Opus’”.

Fans will have their own views as to the best tracks and the sequencing on Best of the Other Sides. I think that the eleven choices, maybe aside from Lyra, are wonderful. A perfectly blend combination of songs that spans different sides of Kate Bush’s recording career. Some great covers and Under the Ivy. Her best B-side. I know there will be a lot of demand and excitement when the vinyl and C.D. versions are released…

ON 31st October.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Revisited: Maude Latour

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight: Revisited

Maude Latour

__________

THE incredible…

Maude Latour is finishing off a run of tour dates at the moment. Her debut album, Sugar Water, was released last year. I covered Latour for Spotlight back in 2022. I am going to get to some interviews published with her since 2022. Some more recent ones. You may not know this artist, but I hope that the interviews I am bringing in will give you inspiration to check out her music. I am going to start out with an article from Ones to Watch. They spoke with Maude Latour about Sugar Water. I will return to Ones to Watch and a second chat, where they spoke with Maude Latour about her Sugar Water tour. However, this first interview is one I want to lead with:

“Pop prophet Maude Latour has been training for most of her life. Having built an intricate world for her music from the start of her career, today’s debut studio album, Sugar Water is the fully realized version of years of soul searching through song. But don’t worry, Latour is not done searching and will never be.

“My debut album is about growing up and learning how to lose things, people, and love— all parts of getting older," shares Latour. This album is an attempt at trying to hold onto the sweetness of this short life while it is still happening. It’s my most existential, deepest thoughts coated in pop music. I hope it takes you on the journey of a lifetime.”

The story begins with “Officially Mine” a track that brings high energy and blissful optimism front and center. It’s the peak of Latour’s signature electro-pop flair and engaging flow, possessing the bubbling electricity of a budding crush. The following tracks are two out of three previously released singles, leaving the rest of the album in completely uncharted territory. Latour wields this power by immersing listeners in a maze of love, loss, and reflection on her upbringing and the future she’s paving for herself.

“Whirlpool” and the title track are a one-two punch of Latour’s more experimental side, emphasizing the curious nature of Sugar Water. She experiences the unstable effects of growing up while remaining at ease, knowing it’s all part of the plan. In the emotional “Comedown” an epic ode to first loves and a standout moment on the album, Latour’s forced to stare at her past self and understand how it’s led her here. After “Comedown,” the focus shifts from nostalgia to moving forward. “Summer of Love,” which Latour revealed was a strong contender to be the album’s opening track, signifies this redirection. It’s a sweet confidence boost, bringing back the contagious energy of earlier tracks. Latour sings of a whirlwind summer romance, one that feels like a rebirth without the pressure of permanence.

In the ethereal “Save Me”, a Dido-inspired album highlight, Latour lets down her defenses in a way she rarely has before. The music of Latour has always been about everyone’s own ability to let the magic of the world push them forward, even in the toughest times. In “Save Me,” our heroine is so in love that she’s able to admit she might need a little help picking herself up from time to time. It’s a beautiful moment, one that doesn’t only stand out on the album but amongst Latour’s entire discography”

Whether it's because of her meticulous attention to detail or her pure ability to captivate through song, listening to Sugar Water feels like a front-row seat to your own life, described through Maude Latour’s eyes. Whether you’re a first-time listener or a long-time fan, the palpable connection Latour has with her audience and her music is undeniable. To say this is an impressive debut would be an understatement and we look forward to witnessing the path this rising star is paving for herself”.

There are a couple of other interviews I want to come to before rounding things up. Boston University’s WTBU Radio spoke with Maude Latour about her incredible record; “the creative process, and what it’s like being a young musician in the digital age”. If you have not followed and heard Maude Latour, then you do need to check her out. I have been listening to her music for a few years now and it is amazing to see her grow and get this attention. A phenomenal talent that deserves massive and long-lasting success. This is someone who is going to have a very long career:

“Tabitha Curry (TC): I wanted to ask about the sound of the record—how did it come together and what were you drawing on?

Maude Latour (ML): Totally. Well, “Cosmic” was the first song that I wrote for the album [Sugar Water]. I wanted this album to reference all the different musical influences that I have – moments of rock, trippy distorted guitar, 2012 recession pop, electronic music, club music, trippy psychedelic music, hyper-pop. I wanted to blur all these genres and make something that was a kaleidoscope of me and all the music that I love.

TC: Do you find that all of your songs come from this metaphysical place where you feel almost bestowed upon an idea? Are there things that trigger the feeling of needing to write a song about it, or is it totally outside of you?

ML: I think there’s different categories of how things can initiate. Maybe if I was not doing this professionally, I would just wait for those moments to happen. When you want to dive in deeply and make anything a practice, you have to practice opening this channel and letting things just stream through and not judging them. Just getting the bad songs out, getting everything that’s not the song out and learning how to listen instead of having it come from you. But, there’s definitely songs that I’ve kickstarted— maybe those aren’t as good or as pure. Every song has a moment of “Oh, wait, this part and then this part – wait and then together they make a new idea”. There’s no way that that divine synchronicity comes from me. That’s totally something else in the works.

PHOTO CREDIT: Anna Koblish

TC: On the idea of being an artist and having to produce a product—how does that feel in this time where social media runs becoming “relevant?” What’s that like for you?

ML: Hitting the nail on the head. I think this is all a humbling journey to remember to practice not comparing yourself and to practice being detatched from numbers and results and posting. I think it’s a mindfulness, a challenge of do you love your art so much that who cares about the results – can it be that pure? I think that’s how I’ve approached the promotion of it over a long period of time—I’ve been putting out music for eight years. It is such an important part of it, it’s allowed the most exciting moments of growth in my career and it’s how everyone knows my music at all—it’s only through social media. It’s through word of mouth sometimes, like with your roommates. But, it’s a love-hate relationship and we all have it. We all compare ourselves, but it’s a perfect obstacle to have to wake up in the morning and be like “the numbers don’t matter, they can’t matter.”

TC: Okay, what’s new about this tour? Obviously, you’re headlining versus opening—which you did for Fletcher, right? What’s different about being at the center of it?

ML: I am very excited, I’ve toured a lot of times and I want this to be a very new experience. I’ve never toured an album before, so there are twelve new songs that I haven’t sung to the people who know my music. I feel it will be a very different experience, but also pulling from all the things that have made my shows uniquely mine in the past. I’m really taking people on the journey of this album and I want to bring it to life. I want to make it make sense for people in person. I am most looking forward to getting a totally new meaning from the songs when I hear other people experiencing them. This album has been a question mark of if people have listened to it and if they like it. To see what it means to them so that I fill this empty hole in my heart that I feel when I’m away from everyone. It will be so fun. Are you going to be at the show? What show are you going to be at?”.

I am going to end with another interview from Ones to Watch. In the interview, Maude Latour reflected on the Sugar Water tour. Interviewed some time after her album was released, this is someone who was changing lives and captivating fans. As we read in the opening of the interview, Ones to Watch spoke with Latour at the Regent Theater in L.A. They write how you could “feel the block buzzing with excitement from the line of jittery fans decked out in Sugar Water blue, sparkly makeup, hair tinsel, and merch dedicated to the artist on the sold out marquee - the glittery pop prophet that is Maude Latour”:

“OnesToWatch: I was listening to the last time we chatted, which was a few weeks before the album came out, and I remember you saying it was one of the first times you ever talked about Sugar Water in-depth. You were fascinated by what your listeners were going to make of it. Now that you’ve toured this album, what have you noticed? How are you feeling?

Maude Latour: You know that my live show is the core of what makes this special. I'm surprised at how much the songs make so much more sense in the room. “Sugar Water”, the title track, was meant to be in this room. It's such a weird song, so I was nervous to see if people fucked with it or not and these shows made it all make sense. It’s the existential rave that I wanted it to be. “Bloom” hits so hard, which is one of my favorites on the album. I can't believe how much people understand it and feel it. It’s exactly what it's supposed to be and I feel like I'm relearning the meaning of Sugar Water. It feels like I'm ending a chapter, saying goodbye to these feelings and entering a new part of my life. I'm starting to make new music and now I really live here [Los Angeles], I’ve moved fully and have no plans to go back to New York.

I was going to ask, last night of tour in LA - does it feel like home?

This is the first time I feel like I’m coming home, for sure. I'm singing “taste it all like sugar water” to myself every night and I've learned what it means on a new level, wishing for this tour to never end and making peace with the fact that it is going to end. It’s ending right now. That's exactly what the album's about, trying to be as present as possible and knowing it's going to end but still taking in the full moment. So, I feel like I'm relearning the meaning of the album.

When we last talked, we were saying how it was going to be underrated and I've seen the love for it grow throughout the album being out and the tour.

I'm so glad, I agree. It's taken on a whole new life form. It's been so important to me, in my years of writing music, that I help the listener feel like the main character when they put their headphones on. They're the powerful ones in the story that I'm telling. I never make the lyrics self-deprecating, I want my music to have confidence building effects on people. “Save Me” is the first time that I've ever asked for help in a song. I was nervous to make a song like that, because it’s not what I think of my music being for, but that's what this album is about. This new part of life where you’re mourning things in the past for the first time, the beautiful parts of life and losses in life. It's my first time opening my heart in that way. With “Save Me," I ask the crowd to talk to strangers. It’s been such a powerful moment. That is my core, truest mission: making strangers feel like they can look in each other's eyes and see each other totally. This tour feels aligned with those little missions, like the secret box that I'm having at the merch stand and that moment with the crowd during “Save Me." The point is to feel that every night and it feels like my own little holy space, this belief in people.

What are the biggest lessons the Sugar Water tour and album have taught you?

The feeling of being self-assured and confident…it's growing in me. Everyone has a vision in their heart of their truth, their life, and their plan. You can trust your instincts and you can trust your vision, and no one can make those decisions for you. You know the world inside your head. The people in the audience waited for me to make this album. They have supported me for five, six years at this point…and they're still here. It makes me feel like I’m beginning a new version of myself, a new chapter of my life.

I trust myself. There are new feelings in these rooms. There are moments of total love and explosive joy, and then there's sadness. Every night people scream the lyric, “Why am I still so broken-hearted?” with complex pain. They’re people who are grieving, people who are changing. This is a room for all of these things. I'm mourning my own things right now and this tour has helped me do that, reminding me every night “Open your eyes, this is happening right now. This is gonna end.” That’s why this album exists, to learn to love those losses because they make everything bloom. Every night when “Bloom” hits, I think of people that have inspired me and people who aren’t with me anymore…the past versions of myself. They’re all with me in the room.

I know we want to savor the moment so we don’t have to look too far into the future, but what’s next for Maude Latour?

It's important to me that the next thing I write is scary. When I was writing Sugar Water, I was looking at the past, at all the things I was saying goodbye to. I don’t know what the future holds, it's a blank slate again. I don't know who this older version of me is, at all, and I want to write songs that are honest. I want…no I need to need the songs I write. I want to learn something about myself through the next music and I need it to teach me how I feel. I don't know who I would be without my songs, they've taught me so much. They are questions that I put into the world and then the music comes back and tells me what I need to know for the next chapter. I'm curious what it'll tell me, but I'm so excited”.

I am going to leave things there. That is just an introduction to Maude Latour. I would advise people to do some more reading and listen to all of her stuff. Her latest single, TikTokBoom, was released last month. I am looking forward to seeing what comes next for her. Having first spotlighted her in 2022, I was keen to revisit. A successful and wonderful debut album and a fantastic tour, she is going to be winding down soon before the end of the year. It is a perfect time to discover this artist who is bound for Pop greatness. An original and intensely captivating voice in modern music, make sure you go and check out…

THE stunning Maude Latour.

___________

Follow Maude Latour

PHOTO CREDIT: Devin Kasparian 

Official:

https://www.maudelatour.com/

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/maudelstatus

TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@maudelstatus/

Twitter:

https://x.com/maudelstatus/

Spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/artist/3MNLhvqJkWsO6tcjY9ps62?si=piHs-Ec1Rua4k7tKS4UxVQ

YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLf62P_jQF1qO_aJjYa68zA

Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/maudelstatus/

FEATURE: The Best of the Other Sides Compilation: The Last of Kate Bush Dipping into the Archive?

FEATURE:

 

 

The Best of the Other Sides Compilation

The Last of Kate Bush Dipping into the Archive?

__________

THERE are a mix of emotions…

when Kate Bush announces that she is reissuing an album or bringing out something. It is not brand new music, though the latest announcement is a chance for fans to own a follow-up to an album released in 2018. We will get the Best of the Other Sides  soon. The digital release is available from 26th September, and the vinyl and C.D. release is out on 31st October. You can pre-order here. Featuring remixes and B-sides, I wonder if the new album will offer anything new on top of the 2018 release. That was discontinued. It was great to have those incredible B-sides in one place. It is also sometimes a tease for fans. Bush has said that she is issuing this album for those who did not get a chance to own the 2018 box-set. She has mentioned several tracks and provided some commentary/background, which I am guessing will appear among the album’s tracks. We get highlighted Experiment IV and Rocket Man. I want to highlight the text relating to The Man I Love and Under the Ivy:

“This romantic song was written by George and Ira Gershwin and when Larry Adler put an album together of their songs, called The Glory of Gershwin, he asked me to sing this beautiful song. The album was produced by George Martin. I was very fond of George - such a special talent and creative spirit, a really gentle man, very kind and incredibly interesting. It was a great honour to work with him and Larry. George and Larry were very different personalities (Larry was a real character), but they made a great creative combination.

It was released as a single and Kevin Godley directed the video. I loved working with Kevin - so imaginative and great fun. I’d worked with him and Lol Creme when they directed the video for Peter Gabriel’s song, Don’t Give Up. Kevin chose to present the video in a very traditional way which suited the song extremely well. Godley and Creme are huge talents who left their mark not just in the music industry with their intelligence and wit in the band 10CC but also in the visual world with their groundbreaking videos, working with an impressive list of diverse artists."

"I needed a track to put on the B-Side of the single Running Up That Hill so I wrote this song really quickly. As it was just a simple piano/vocal, it was easy to record.

I performed a version of the song that was filmed at Abbey Rd Studios for a TV show which was popular at the time, called The Tube. It was hosted by Jools Holland and Paula Yates. I find Paula’s introduction to the song very touching.

It was filmed in Studio One at Abbey Rd. An enormous room used for recording large orchestras, choirs, film scores, etc. It has a vertiginously high ceiling and sometimes when I was working in Studio Two,  a technician, who was a good friend, would take me up above the ceiling of Studio One. We had to climb through a hatch onto the catwalk where we would then crawl across and watch the orchestras working away, completely unaware of the couple of devils hovering in the clouds, way above their heads!  I used to love doing this - the acoustics were heavenly at that scary height. We used to toy with the idea of bungee jumping from the hatch."

Her studio albums have been remastered and there has been a lot of retrospection the past six of seven years. However, it is activity from Kate Bush, so one cannot complain! Also, the more retrospection or reissuing we get, it raises the question as to whether this will be Bush ready to start on new work. Kate Bush News were among those who reported on a big and interesting announcement yesterday:

“From her official site announcement:

Fish People are delighted to announce the release of Best of The Other Sides. Digital Release 26th September. Coloured vinyl (Lothlorien colour) release and also CD are available from 31st October. The Other Sides was a collection of all the B-sides and other songs that didn’t exist on any album. It was part of the Remastered Box Set that was released in 2018. That set is no longer available. Three of the tracks have been slightly reworked for the release.

Best of The Other Sides has been designed for people who didn’t have access to that original box set. The title is self-explanatory.

Kate writes: “We have remastered ‘Experiment IV’ and ‘ You Want Alchemy?’ and both include a small edit. I felt ‘ Experiment IV’ would benefit from a longer intro featuring Alan Murphy’s magnificent guitar. ‘You Want Alchemy?’ also has a small edit that tightens up the outro and we’ve re-eq’d the track. ‘Walk Straight Down the Middle’ has also benefitted from being re-eq’d. Hope you enjoy the tweaks!”

The remaining material from The Other Sides will be re released digitally at a later date.”.

It looks like a slimmed version of The Other Sides. It is a pity that we do not get the original reissued. Whatever, it looks like we are going to get more soon enough. I am looking forward the remastered Experiment IV, Walk Straight Down the Middle and You Want Alchemy. The former was a single so had a music video made, though the other two tracks never did. I would love to see Bush releasing a promotional video for one or more of the songs. I hope there is something in the way of a music video. It will not feature Bush, though there would be a lot of interested if she put something out to coincide with the album release. I am sure the physical versions of The Best of the Other Sides will be amazing. The vinyl will be especially impressive. Bush has said how, when it comes to the vinyl release, “all of these are mixed colour vinyl, so each one is individual”. Many fans are embracing a chance to own something not available at the moment. However, many have speculated this is the final bit of looking back before Kate Bush announces a new album. She has spent a lot of time with her older material in recent years. After 2014’s Before the Dawn residency, maybe that adulation and the generations coming together inspired her to focus on her previous work. I don’t think she would have considered this decades ago. The Whole Story, her only greatest hits album, was released in 1986. Kate Bush was hesitant back then of releasing a greatest hits. Always about new music and looking ahead. However, at a certain point in a career, an artist does look back and wants fans old and new to experience their older work in a new way. I think Kate Bush has probably exhausted most avenues.

I do think that there is more in the archives. In terms of unheard material or demos. Maybe Bush does not want to release anything that is incomplete or she is not completely happy with. I do think it would be nice if we got one final album of music that perhaps has never seen the light of the day. Maybe a new greatest hits album that updates The Whole Story. Would fans object to one last repackage and reissue? Technically, a new greatest hits would not be a reissue but an expansion. I do think that Bush is keen to see some of her lesser-heard songs and B-sides put on Spotify and on physical formats. So that it can reach new people. We will learn more very soon about what the tracklisting will be and there might be a post from Kate Bush herself. I wonder whether this is the final time Kate Bush will reissue an album or look back? You have to wonder what else there is. Aerial turns twenty in November, so possibly something relating to that? Will Kate Bush reissue that album or maybe just its second album/disc, A Sky of Honey? I do think that she has probably exhausted the retrospective side. She may not want to spend more time either with reissuing a studio album or remastering B-sides and looking at that side of things. This does all bring to mind whether new music is coming next. I don’t think that we will see an announcement until next year now. However, this unexpected bit of news yesterday has excited people. It is a great release that I am interested in. I am intrigued to hear the remastered Experiment IV particularly. If The Man I Love is in the mix. A 1994 song that shows a different side to her voice. Smokier than pretty much anything she has released. What comes next is anyone’s guess. It is clear Bush is still connected to her past work. She wants to make sure fans have access to it and in physical formats. 

Not to say Bush should never reissue an album or dip into the archives. I did wonder if she would release anything around Hounds of Love turning forty (which turned forty on 16th September). Maybe some B-sides or something special. She did not even post to her website, so I wonder why she overlooked one of her favourite albums! It is good that we are hearing from her now. Something that fans can own that was discontinued. A new album…albeit one with older material. But these rare gems. I do feel like this is the end of the archive period. Nowhere really to go in that respect. It could be the case that Kate Bush is now going to spend all of her energy looking to new material. I have written in a feature that is coming out in the future what a new album might sound like and what it will be motivated by in terms of its themes and lyrics. For the moment, it is great that Kate Bush has graced us with this amazing news and a great album with Best of the Other Sides. The vinyl is one you will want to snap up. I might grab the C.D. version. We will get more detail soon in terms of the album appearing digitally and whether there will be another additional release. Even if a few of the songs have had some minor tweaks, I think that it will add new light and depth to these songs. It will be a must-own edition for existing fans, but also a real treat for new fans. Many of whom would not have heard these songs. If some bemoan Kate Bush bringing out existing material and charging for it, I do think we are closer to new material. In my view, this is the last of the archiving releases. We wait to see what comes next. Kate Bush is engaging with fans and is connected with her older music. This is a really positive thing, and we should all be…

THANKFUL for that!

FEATURE: “Mother, Where Are the Angels?” Kate Bush’s Suspended in Gaffa at Forty-Three

FEATURE:

 

 

“Mother, Where Are the Angels?”

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush with her mother, Hannah, in the video for Suspended in Gaffa (a single taken from Kate Bush’s 1982 studio album, The Dreaming)

Kate Bush’s Suspended in Gaffa at Forty-Three

__________

WHEN I normally…

mark the anniversary of this Kate Bush song, I also write about There Goes a Tenner. Both singles were released on 2nd November, 1982. They were included on her fourth studio album, The Dreaming. There Goes a Tenner was released in the U.K. and Ireland only. Another single, Night of the Swallow, was a later release that only came out in Ireland. The Dreaming had an odd single release schedule. I agree that maybe four or five should have been released, though considering she could have put out Houdini and Get Out of My House, you wonder whether it was the wisest decision to release The Dreaming and There Goes a Tenner as singles. I love both of these songs, though I feel the music videos of Houdini and Get Out of My House would have been more powerful and could have resulted in top twenty placings for both songs. The first single, The Dreaming, got into the top twenty – that was as good as it got. One of the poorest-selling singles albums, it was hard to market in that way. Bush was not looking to write singles, so it was not surprising that the chart positions were quite low. This was not the only time that Kate Bush released two singles on the same day…or close to it. For The Red Shoes, Eat the Music and Rubberband Girl came out within a day of each other in 1993. The former was released in the U.S., whilst Rubberband Girl was released everywhere else in the world. Circling back to The Dreaming and its second single that came out on 2nd November, 1982. Suspended in Gaffa was only released in continental Europe and Australia. I am not sure why it was released there. You would think The Dreaming and its Australian connections would be released only there. Suspended in Gaffa warranted a more widespread release! It reached the top fifty in a few European countries – including number thirty-three in France -, but was a very minor success.

It is a shame, as this is one of Kate Bush’s best songs. Many highlight Night of the Swallow as one of these gems that is rarely talked about. But it is a masterpiece. The same could be said of Suspended in Gaffa. In an album with quite a few intense and darker songs, Suspended in Gaffa has this spright and energetic bounce that is at odds with more propulsive and heavier songs such as Pull Out the Pin and Get Out of My House. I want to start off by coming back to a source I included in my most recent feature of Suspended in Gaffa (and There Goes a Tenner). It is interesting that Suspended in Gaffa has been covered quite a few times; by pretty obscure artists for the most part. It was also performed three time for T.V. Kate Bush mimed each time. She performed it live in October 1982 for Houba Houba (France); 2nd November, 1982 for Bananas (Germany), and 30th  December, 1982 on Champs Elysées (France). The inspiration behind the song is interesting, as we see in this Kate Bush Encyclopedia feature:

“Suspended In Gaffa’ is, I suppose, similar in some ways to ‘Sat In Your Lap’ – the idea of someone seeking something, wanting something. I was brought up as a Roman Catholic and had the imagery of purgatory and of the idea that when you were taken there that you would be given a glimpse of God and then you wouldn’t see him again until you were let into heaven. And we were told that in Hell it was even worse because you got to see God but then you knew that you would never see him again. And it’s sorta using that as the parallel. And the idea of seeing something incredibly beautiful, having a religious experience as such, but not being able to get back there. And it was playing musically with the idea of the verses being sorta real time and someone happily jumping through life [Makes happy motion with head] and then you hit the chorus and it like everything sorta goes into slow mo and they’re reaching [Makes slow reaching motion with arm] for that thing that they want and they can’t get there. [Laughs]

Interview for MTV, November 1985”.

I am going to concentrate on the lyrics of the song to end. However, to start out, I am coming back to a Dreams of Orgonon article for Suspended in Gaffa and highlight a few observations and insights that they make about the track. I think this is one of the most underrated songs of Kate Bush’s career. A single that deserved wider distribution and more love on the charts:

“It has the same expansive and consumptive obsessions as its sister songs — youthful aporia, an obsession with an unreachable god, a desire to unite with the subconscious. Yet it filters this through a childlike, somewhat Carrollian filter, with a surfeit of internal rhymes, abstract nouns, and ambiguous pronouns like “out in the garden/there’s half of a heaven/and we’re only bluffing,” “I try to get nearer/but as it gets clearer/there’s something appears in the way,” “I pull out the plank and say/thankee for yanking me back/to the fact that there’s always something to distract.”

The lyric is an endless series of prevarications, often relating to knowledge, or the unattainability of it (see “Sat in Your Lap”). The refrain’s “not till I’m ready for you,” “can I have it all now?/we can’t have it all,” “but they’ve told us/unless we can prove that we’re doing it/we can’t have it all” speak to an “all or nothing” approach, not identifying exactly what’s at stake so much as its urgency. Desire gets codified as an end in itself, often for a god (“I caught a glimpse of a god/all shining and bright”) — “until I’m ready for you” gives away the game (constructive spiritual union with a deity is impossible if one is unready to consent). “The idea of the song is that of being given a glimpse of ‘God’ — something that we dearly want — but being told that unless we work for it, we will never see it again, and even then, we might not be worthy of it,” Bush explained to her fan club. Tapping into the subconscious is a difficulty — when one has a glimpse of something wondrous, there’s a desperation to retrieve the feelings associated with it. “Everything or nothing” can be a neurodivergent impulse, but it’s also how a taste of the sublime works.

The nature of aporia in “Suspended in Gaffa” is cinematic. There’s the title, obviously, referring to the line “am I suspended in gaffa?,” itself a reference to gaffer (or “gaffa”) tape, which is commonly used in film and stage productions. The laboriousness of cinema is inferred a few times (“it all goes slo-mo”), as reflections and manipulation, staples of cinema, get pulled into the mix. Bush even goes quasi-Lacanian at one point; nudging herself with “that girl in the mirror/between you and me/she don’t stand a chance of getting anywhere at all,” a moment of amusing self-deprecation.

The music video, while counterintuitively simple in its setup of Bush dancing on her own in a barn, is similarly weird. Bush’s hair is made up to twice the height of her head as she dances in a purple jumpsuit, slowly jogging in place and thrashing her arms on the floor like an adolescent Job on her rural ash pile. In a pleasantly domestic turn, Bush’s mother Hannah appears (shockingly) as Bush’s mother. The resulting video is both tender and discordant, the ethos of “Suspended in Gaffa” in microcosm.

Bush’s fight with aporia moves forward. She mixes religious metaphors like a hermeneuticist in a Westminster pub (“it’s a plank in me eye,” taken from Matthew 7:5, is adjuncted by “a camel/who’s trying to get through it,” a quiet subversion of the Talmudic “eye of a needle” axiom, cited by Christ in the Synoptic Gospels and additionally by the Qu’ran 7:40), grasping fragments of faiths, mediums, and metaphors in their simplest form. The results are crucially inchoate, as the perspective of a child so often is. Yet through that rudimentary perspective comes a different understanding of emotional truths than one usually finds from an adult point-of-view. Fragments and naïveté are by no means inherently less scholarly than a more mature perspective; sometimes, they’re the most efficacious tools a person has for exploring the ridiculous and sublime”.

I am going to return to the Kate Bush Encyclopedia and what Kate Bush said about filming its music video. One that features a brief appearance from her mother, Hannah. She hugs her daughter in a really lovely and powerful moment! I think that the video, whilst simple, is one of the best she released. Directed by Brian Wiseman, it is a visual that stays in the head:

“Kate wrote about the filming of this music video: “The video of ‘Suspended in Gaffa’ was to be done as simply and quickly as possible; as always with very little time to complete it in, the simpler the better. I saw it as being the return to simplicity, a light-hearted dance routine, no extras, no complicated special effects. As we were all so pleased with the previous sets – put together under the supervision of a very clever man, Steve Hopkins – we asked him to build another, this time an old barn with large gaps in the walls where we could allow the light to streak through. We used a combination of natural and artificial light, and everyone was thrilled with the sense of realism that the set achieved. Steve brought in huge branches of trees that were behind the gaps in the set, and a dedicated helper called ‘Podge’ sat up on a piece of scaffolding for six hours and enthusiastically shook a piece of tree to make the light move and dance as if motivated by a furtive wind. The video did remain uncomplicated – just a few effects and just one extra: but a very special. one”.

I think that Suspended in Gaffa is one of the most tattoo-worthy songs in her cannon. In terms of the lyrics and how you should have them on your skin. Prime examples include “Out in the garden/There’s half of a heaven”, “I caught a glimpse of a god, all shining and bright”, and “That girl in the mirror/Between you and me/She don’t stand a chance of getting anywhere at all”. On 2nd November, this amazing single turns forty-three. In a wider sense, it is the fourth track on The Dreaming. It is sandwiched between two quite haunting and intense songs: Pull Out the Pin and Leave It Open. The tracks are quite hypnotic in their own way. I think Suspended in Gaffa offers some levity and reflection. It is a deep and fascinating song that breaks up two slightly more dense and layered numbers. A freedom and comparative looseness to Suspended in Gaffa. It is a masterful Kate Bush song I have rarely heard played on the radio. There is not too much written about it. That brilliant video and those compelling lyrics. It is peak Kate Bush! I am aware there are some fans of Bush who might not know about this song at all. It is a work of incredible brilliance that…

YOU really need to hear.

FEATURE: A Design for Life: The Pleasure and Joy of a Music Book…and Why These Books Deserve More Attention

FEATURE:

 

A Design for Life

PHOTO CREDIT: Orion Publishing Co

The Pleasure and Joy of a Music Book…and Why These Books Deserve More Attention

__________

IT is pretty blissful…

IN THIS PHOTO: BBC Radio 3 broadcaster Elizabeth Alker is the author of the incredible new book, Everything We Do is Music: How 20th-Century Classical Music Shaped Pop

when you get to own a hardback music book! I have nothing against a paperback, though nothing beats the feel of a hardback! The toughness and solidity. It is this bulky and weighty book that is a pleasure to own and read. Maybe it is just me, though I don’t think we discuss music books enough. I have spoken about this before. How we review albums and singles, and yet music books are not really included alongside them. They may appear in the ‘Books’ section of a website, though that it is often reserved for non-music books. Fiction. I do feel that there are some amazing works relatively under-discussed because they are not albums. Works from authors not as important as those from artists. I am going to move to look at two recent music books that explore the songs of two decades-running but very different artists. I am starting out with 168 Songs of Hatred and Failure: A History of Manic Street Preachers by Keith Cameron. Published on 11th September, I did not know about this book. I am a Manic Street Preachers fan, so this sounds really interesting. Also, at 560 pages, it is one of the most voluminous and detailed music books of the year! A true tome that should be read by Manics fans and those who maybe do not know that much about the band:

“The story of Manic Street Preachers is unique in pop. Raging out of the stricken mining communities of south Wales in the late 80s, they were bonded by friendships, family ties and a self-styled 'geometry of contempt', whereby James Dean Bradfield and Sean Moore would orchestrate the daring intellectual broadsides written by Richey Edwards and Nicky Wire. Seemingly condemned to mere cult status by a cruel juncture of artistic triumph, commercial failure and personal despair, the story took an agonising twist when the tragedy of Edwards' 1995 disappearance was followed by a remarkable rebirth built upon 'A Design For Life's hymn to the band's working-class roots, and then the award-winning, multi-million-selling album Everything Must Go, a majestic soundtrack to history and loss.

Less than five years later, Manic Street Preachers played to 60,000 at the national stadium of Wales and had their second UK Number 1 single. Subsequent output has confirmed the band as both a wellspring of restless creativity and a barometer of the cultural conversation.

Because it was music that saved them, it's through the prism of their music that Keith Cameron tells the definitive history of Manic Street Preachers, drawing on many hours of new interviews to dive deep into 168 songs, from 1988's debut single 'Suicide Alley' to the late day peaks of 2025's album Critical Thinking. Writing with the band's full co-operation, his book charts the dynamic evolution of a universe in which Karl Marx and Kylie Minogue happily co-exist, that accords Rush and The Clash equal favour, and where Morrissey & Marr meet Torvill & Dean via Nietzsche and New Order in a single four-minute pop song - all in the name of what Nicky Wire himself calls 'the fabulous disaster' of Manic Street Preachers”.

 I am going to quote from a five-star review MOJO awarded 168 Songs of Hatred and Failure: A History of Manic Street Preachers recently. Truly, you have to admire the passion and work that has gone into this book. Also, at only thirty pounds, it is remarkably good value considering how much information you get! I don’t think that we talk about the importance and relevance of music books. I am going to focus on a couple that document the songs of great artists. However, there are so many different approaches and directions music books can take. From the more hagiographic to something with a unique direction:

“In his brisk introduction to this 550-page triumph, the MOJO writer Keith Cameron perfectly summarises a 37-year career: “Manic Street Preachers built their own reality, then rebuilt it multiple times.”

They arrived from their native south Wales as a neo-punk quartet with a year-zero interview technique. Now, three decades after the disappearance of Richey Edwards, they manage to combine the damaged wisdom of middle age with the restlessness that has always defined them. Which is to say, the Manics remain a completely singular presence, with reference points that no other rock group has ever got near, from Albert Camus to the Skids. That means, of course, that they are a dream subject for the right kind of author, and ideally suited to a Revolution In The Head-esque telling of their story via forensic exploration of their compositions and recordings, and everything that has been poured into them.

 

In between lies a narrative full of wonderful detail. 1993’s From Despair To Where was based on a brilliantly madcap quest to somehow combine Joy Division’s From Safety To Where with Rod Stewart’s True Blue, and momentarily convinced the Manics’ late manager and mentor Philip Hall that it was “gonna be our transatlantic Number 1, like Maggie May.” On Underdogs, a limited-edition single that trailed 2007’s Send Away The Tigers, Bradfield ruefully admits that he was far too in thrall to Metallica: “I was completely fucking Hetfielded out of my mind. It was too big, too proto-metal, too legs astride.” On a doomed European tour in 1994, Wire survived on “personal stocks of Crunchy Nut cornflakes, which he kept under his bunk on the tourbus.”

The over-arching plot is driven by the aforementioned creative rebuilding – tales of how this most self-aware of bands have consistently transformed what they do, which Wire and Bradfield tell with both insight and bathetic humour. But as well as their contributions, what really clinches the book’s excellence is Cameron’s incisive prose. Nicky Wire’s vocal on 2009’s William’s Last Words, he writes, was “nervous but resolute, like watery early morning sunlight”. The Masses Against The Classes, the ferocious single that reached Number 1 in January 2000, is nailed as “a self-directed booby trap of rage at what the Manics had become”.

His most vivid observation of all is that whatever the crises and fireworks scattered through this book, what really matters is the art: “Songs made the Manics, offered them a means to escape, to transcend and to celebrate themselves, and songs saved them and sustain them still.” This is the story told here, so consummately that it feels completely definitive”.

There is another song-by-song book that has come out recently that, again, pairs music passion and depth into this beautiful hardback. Whilst quite a few books about Beyoncé have been written, I don’t think there has been enough focus on this iconic and hugely important artist. One of the most influential of her generation. Annie Zaleski’s Beyoncé: The Stories Behind the Songs: Every single track, explored and explained is a book that interests me greatly – as a big Beyoncé fan. Here are some details:

“Discover the full story behind every single song Beyoncé has ever released.

From Destiny's Child to Cowboy Carter, this is the definitive guide to one of music's greatest ever talents, covering hundreds of songs including:

- hit singles
- hidden gems
- soundtracks
- cover versions
- deep cuts

...and much more besides.

Award-winning music writer Annie Zaleski (Rolling Stone, Billboard, the Guardian) explores and explains the fascinating details of every song, from early group hit 'Say My Name' to solo work such as 'Crazy In Love' and 'Run The World (Girls)' - and including the all-conquering Cowboy Carter.

A journey through pop, hip-hop, R&B, gospel and even country, this is Beyoncé's story told through her incredible music”.

Fans will know about this book no doubt. Anyone who follows Annie Zaleski on social media. However, I cannot find any reviews for this book. No interviews with her either. It is amazing that we do not really spend much time with music books or give them even a fraction of the time we do on albums in terms of promotion and inspection.

PHOTO CREDIT: Headline Publishing Group

These two books are about specific artists. There have been some brilliant recent music books published recently. I published a feature about Elizabeth Alker’s Everything We Do is Music: How 20th-Century Classical Music Shaped Pop. Fortunately there was a bit more in the way of spotlighting and investigation. However, even then, I don’t think enough websites and music sites put this amazing book on their pages! I am going to quote from the start and end of a review from The Arts Desk for one of this year’s best music books:

“Composers and musicians explore acoustic space. Generally, they have got by with combinations of readily accessible sounds, with occasional novelties as instruments improved, bit by bit.

In the 20th century that changed radically. New technologies offered almost unlimited increase in the sounds that could be conjured up on stage or in the studio. And conceptually, the range of sounds some considered musical expanded just as much, abolishing the boundary between music and noise, and even – thanks to John Cage – permitting the composer to propose no sounds at all.

Elizabeth Alker dives into this history with great verve. Her chapters generally pair a well-known track from a pop hit-maker with one or more pioneers of composition or technology, often linking to a scene or scenes where new sounds were mixed, and remixed, by experimentally-minded artists.

Alker’s openness to new sounds and the range of her enthusiasms is admirable, if slightly dazzling. Each chapter deals with a different acoustic world, and, like all good music books, her writing invites pausing to listen to new things, or revisit old ones with a different appreciation. It’s a book to keep on the shelf to cue new exploration when the stuff you have been listening to feels a little too predictable.

The description fits another excellent recent title from the same publisher, one that prompts a final acknowledgment for one of the conditions of this book’s excellence. Alker’s day job is as a presenter for BBC Radio 3, after stints with Radio 6 Music. It’s hard to imagine anywhere better for an ace communicator who is at home with a vast range of contemporary composition as well as the full gamut of pop genres to develop their work. Her book comes just a few years after fellow Radio 3 person Kate Molleson’s Sound Within Sound, which concerns 20th-century composers who deserve a wider hearing. The books go together very well, and it seems fair to take both as added benefits of the licence fee. Lisa Nandy, please note”.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Elizabeth Alker (@elizabethalker)

There is precious little in the way of websites that document the music books that have been released this year. The Guardian is a rare exception when it comes to archiving the music books that have come out this year. However, these are only a small percentage of what has been released. I am not sure if there is a website that is dedicated to music books. It is a pity that they are not regarded as highly as albums. However, the main point of this feature was to wax lyrical about the beautiful feel of a music book in hardback. I have provided details of three. However, there has been a whole host this year that could easily sit on any music lover’s bookshelf! To me, there are few finer experiences than buying a music book and getting lost in its pages. Ranging from two-hundred to over five-hundred, you can spend days and weeks pouring through them! Whether it relates to a band like Manic Street Preachers and a selection of their important songs, or is a broader look at the link between Classical and Pop music in the twentieth-century. The authors work so hard researching for these books and putting them out. They can take a lot longer than albums. The authors do not have the same opportunities as artists when it comes to touring to earn revenue. Sure, they profit from a slice of the books sales, yet we often put them in a quiet corner of the room, whilst artists are given much more prominence and time. I don’t think that is fair! We do need to properly respect and value these amazing people. Those whose books will delight people for years to come. The very real and tangible pleasure of putting a chunky hardback on the shelf alongside a selection of other music books! Maybe this is specific to me, though I don’t think that it is! Dedicate more column inches to music books and their worth. Talk to these authors more and publish reviews frequently. Change the script and…

TURN the page.

FEATURE: A Dangerous Silence: Can Any Artist Afford to Remain Neutral Regarding Gaza?

FEATURE:

 

 

A Dangerous Silence

IN THIS PHOTO: Nadine Shah

Can Any Artist Afford to Remain Neutral Regarding Gaza?

__________

I guess this applies to…

IN THIS PHOTO: Billie Eilish performs at Avicii Arena on 23rd April, 2025 in Stockholm, Sweden/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

issues beyond genocide in Gaza. Palestine is current being ravaged and, slow to act and get involved, the world’s leaders are not exactly leading when it comes to anger, moral and action! Almost complicit and pacifistic, I have said how the music industry seems a lot more vocal than the political world. A whole host of artists have spoken out against what is being perpetrated by Israel. Including Nadine Shah, Kneecap, Damon Albarn, Dua Lipa and Billie Eilish, they have shown their support to Palestine and condemned genocide that is almost being allowed to happen. I know it carries a risk speaking out if you are an artist. There are so many issues that need to be addressed and spoken about. The fascism of Donald Trump and what is happening in the U.S. I don’t think artists can pick and choose and what causes they support or remain silent. It seems like complicity if they do not say anything. Florence Pugh has said that those who say nothing are complicit. It is a time when those with a platform need to activate and unite. Brian Eno, who recently curated the Together for Palestine concert, has said how we are living through this massive moment of crisis. It is one of the most disturbing and horrifying acts of violence in social history. One that needs to be met with the greatest coming together of people in human history. That said, more and more artists are becoming involved and discussing the genocide in Gaza. Recently, Brian Eno and Malak Mattar, key figures in the Together for Palestine concert, explained “why artists are putting fears of a backlash aside and uniting in the call for action”:

“Being open to learning about the reality of the situation seems crucial for the shift that is now happening. Eno happily admits that his own views on Gaza changed after visiting the West Bank six years ago. There he saw firsthand what he calls “the relentless humiliation … which is the nastiest weapon in a way … continually demeaning, continually shilly-shallying, pretending there’s a peace process when there’s no intention whatsoever to achieve peace on any kind of terms that the Palestinians could possibly accept.”

When he tried to explain this to people, Eno says, he was always being forced to go through the entire history of the conflict. People were either bamboozled by the conflicting accounts, or looking for an easy way to avoid getting involved. “Israel has always, in my opinion, depended on calling on the complexity of the situation,” says Eno. “To sort of say, ‘Well, of course you don’t really understand it, it’s far more complex than you can imagine.’ But people are no longer asking me to do this, because everyone knows we shouldn’t be in the place we are now.”

PinkPantheress says that having so many fellow artists on the bill supporting the message has made it easier to speak out – and hopefully will make it easier for others to join them in future. “One voice can get ignored,” she says, “but when it’s a chorus it’s way harder. Seeing artists from totally different backgrounds come together proves this isn’t just a political issue but a human one”.

I am going to come to another article from The Guardian, as it follows on and connects to what I have just sourced. Should every artist be expected to speak out against the genocide happening? I think they should. It is not a political decision or choice. It is a humanitarian one! Anyone who does not voice their disgust, in a way, is either not that concerned or thinks their career is more important than highlighting an atrocity that is claiming the lives of thousands of people in Palestine. There are artists whose statements and views on the genocide and Israel’s violence have either been neutral or seemed to skew in favour of Israel. Artists like Nick Cave. Thom Yorke released a statement that was very wishy-washy and neutral. It is so watered down. His Radiohead bandmate, Jonny Greenwood, recently played a concert in Tel Aviv. Radiohead have a history of neutrality and not speaking about Palestine. Whilst we have great artists such as Pillow Queens supporting Palestine, massive bands are very much on the wrong side. Coldplay were recently criticised. Not only because they seemed to suggest we should show love for family of the murdered Charlie Kirk – which seemed to suggest we should show sympathy for him -, but they also have not said anything condemning the genocide in Gaza. The Guardian reacted to Coldplay’s recent Wembley shows and Chris Matlin asking the audience to send out love. He did mention Palestine, though it was very vague and apolitical. Not calling out Israel and showing any anger against those causing the genocide. The 1975 have also actively swerved politics in favour of a more apathetic show or love and support:

“Similarly, on Friday at Wembley, the closing night of the tour, Martin exhorted the crowd to “send love anywhere you wanna send it in the world”. He went on: “You can send it to Charlie Kirk’s family. You can send it to anybody’s family. You can send it to people you disagree with but you send them love anyway.” It is this lack of a definitive statement, along with the barely there acknowledgment of how genuinely divisive these issues and events are, that rendered his warm-fuzzy sentiments hollow even by stadium-rock standards, like a Christian music concert with zero mention of God.

IN THIS PHOTO: Coldplay’s Chris Martin at Wembley Stadium on 22nd August 2025/PHOTO CREDIT: Sipa USA/Alamy 

Perhaps this really is as deep as his engagement goes: you don’t get to 10 studio albums and more than 20 years of world-dominating success by being a firebrand. And, maybe controversially, I don’t believe artists are obliged to speak out about politics: it’s generally neither edifying nor productive for the cause when they weigh in half-heartedly with word salad.

When the 1975’s Matty Healy paused their otherwise brilliant headline set at Glastonbury to elaborate banally on their “conscious decision” to eschew politics in favour of “love and friendship”, it struck a bum note for me in the crowd. No fan of the 1975 needs or expects Healy’s hazy expansions – why stop the show to say nothing?

Many artists, notably young women, do consistently address the conflict in Palestine and other struggles – Chappell Roan, Renée Rapp, Jade Thirlwall among them. Whether this reflects the higher standards placed on women in the public eye, the pressures of their politically engaged young fans or the fact that they are genuinely invested is up for debate; their frequent eloquence, and fearless references to genocide, suggests the last. But their powers of influence are limited: girls and young women are a formidable economic force, but less influential politically”.

This is a time when no artist can really stand back and say nothing. Or say something and say the wrong thing. Sending love out to afflicted nations and besieged people is not the same as rallying against Israel and the genocide they are committing. We do not need artists thinking this is a Summer of Love era. We need Punk anger and snarl! Coldplay, The 1975 and anyone passive and neutral needs to take guidance from those who are risking a lot by speaking out. I know it can be divisive and a commercial risk. Look at some of the most popular artists in the world and how they are not saying enough. Sending a bad message to their fans. As I started by saying, this is not a political decision that can be seen as influencing or controversial. This is people dying and a nation hell bent on destroying Gaza. They should not be thinking about profit and followers over Palestine and doing the right thing. Those who avoid talking about what is happening might think they are doing the right thing. They are not. At one of the most frightening and violent times in human history, they all need to…

DO a lot better!

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Songs from Albums Turning Fifty-Five in 2026

FEATURE:

 

The Digital Mixtape

Songs from Albums Turning Fifty-Five in 2026

__________

CARRYING on this…

series where I collect together songs from albums that celebrate big anniversaries next year, it takes me to 1971. This was a huge year for music and there were some all-time best albums released that year. I am going to join the greatest albums of that year. Albums that celebrate fifty-five years in 2026. Many of you would not have been around in 1971, but you will know most of these albums. I am a big fan of many of the albums released in 1971. Including Hunky Dory from David Bowie, The Who’s Who’s Next, Carole King’s Tapestry, Joni Mitchell’s Blue and Marvin Gaye’s What’s Going On, this was a sensational year! Enjoy the mixtape below, which is a spotlight on the wonder of 1971. It is clearly one of the most astonishing years…

IN music history.

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Songs from Albums Turning Sixty in 2026

FEATURE:

 

 

The Digital Mixtape

Songs from Albums Turning Sixty in 2026

__________

THIS is the first…

in a twelve-part run collating songs from albums with big anniversaries next year. The first takes us back to 1966 and albums turning sixty next year. It was a great year for music when we had career-best albums from the likes of The Beatles, The Beach Boys, and Bob Dylan. Although we will get more notable and consistent years further down this run of features, 1966 was still a really interesting and fertile year for music. To prove that, I have compiled a selection of tracks from the golden albums of 1966. Tracks you or your parents might have grown up listening to, I will move to the prime of 1971 but, for now, these are songs from the very best albums of '66. A classic year that produced more than its fair share…

OF wonderful albums.

FEATURE: Kate Bush’s Aerial at Twenty: The Visual Possibilities of A Sky of Honey

FEATURE:

 

 

Kate Bush’s Aerial at Twenty

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush performing during her Before the Dawn residency in 2014/PHOTO CREDIT: Ken McKay/Rex Features

The Visual Possibilities of A Sky of Honey

__________

IN the final couple…

of features marking twenty years of Kate Bush’s Aerial, I might come to some song investigation and look deeper into the album as a whole. One thing that entrances me about Aerial is its second disc, A Sky of Honey. It is sort of a companion piece to The Ninth Wave on Hounds of Love from 1985. The first side of that album is Hounds of Love; the second is The Ninth Wave. If that suite is about Kate Bush stranded at sea and trying to survive against the odds, A Sky of Honey is more restful but no less immersive and dramatic. Instead, we get to chart the course of a complete summer’s day. From the earliest hours through the night until we get back to the breaking of the light. In terms of the narrative and visions, we are not reserved to an English country garden. The track, Aerial, that ends the album seems to take us to a Balearic island and each maybe. In terms of the music on that suite, it brings in so many influences and nationalities. There is Balearic and Dance alongside Folk. Kate Bush mimicking and duetting with a blackbird. Her giddy laughter. There is also narration and spoken word. On the original, it was the disgraced Rolf Harris who provided vocals as The Painter for An Architect's Dream and The Painter's Link. Bush’s son, Bertie, thankfully replaced those vocals when Aerial was reissued in 2018. I like to think that Bertie was always part of the album. In a way, it is fitting. He was a young child in 2005 when Aerial was released. Bertie is about him. He is very much at the core. Him as a grown man providing vocals over a decade later for songs on the album’s second disc is appropriate. Whereas A Sky of Honey is about the charting of a summer’s day, we get to see the growth and maturation of Bertie on the 2005 release and the 2018 one. Full name Albert McIntosh, he got to perform alongside his mum at the Eventim Apollo in Hammersmith in 2014 for Before the Dawn. The only visualisation of that epic suite.

So many people could not attend any of the Before the Dawn concerts in 2014. There were two firsts in terms of suites. The Ninth Wave receiving its stage debut. That has never been brought to film. I have said how it would be amazing to see a film version of The Ninth Wave. Building a story around it and fleshing it out more. Although I have pitched this before, there is more to add to this notion that A Sky of Honey deserves more. I wrote a feature recently where I said how Kate Bush’s music could be visualised at Frameless in London. This is an immersive art exhibition where paintings come to life and are shown paranormally. It is a truly terrific experience. I would love to see A Sky of Honey visualised and projected at a space like this. Kate Bush could oversee the videos and visuals. I do also think that it would make a wonderful short film. At forty-two minutes, you would not necessarily need to have a wider story. It could be this dazzling short where we start out with Prelude and its beauty. How the suite grows and we end with the rush and headiness of Aerial at the end. The penultimate track, Nocturn, has this Balearic brilliance. This sense of swing and hypnotic bliss. Whether the visuals would be animated or actors would play the roles of Kate Bush and Bertie, I am not so sure. However, twenty years after its release, we have not seen anything in the way of videos. Same with Hounds of Love. They remain as audio pieces and there is very little in the way of the visual. Only And Dream of Sheep for Hounds of Love. I think there are fan videos for A Sky of Honey’s songs, though nothing official from Kate Bush. That strikes me as a missed opportunity.

I would love to see some new videos brought out. Kate Bush wants people to listen to A Sky of Honey in full. It is this single experience. The music itself is so varied and beautiful. However, it is the images that we all have in our heads. It could be this sensational short film or immersive experience. It is worth thinking about the reception to The Ninth Wave. This is what The Guardian noted in 2005:

“Disc two, subtitled 'A Sky of Honey', is a suite of nine tracks which, among other things, charts the passage of light from afternoon ('Prologue') to evening ('An Architect's Dream', 'The Painter's Link') and through the night until dawn. Things get a little hairier here.

The theme of birdsong is soon wearing, and the extended metaphor of painting is laboured. But it's all worth it for the double-whammy to the solar plexus dealt by 'Nocturn' and the final, title track. In 'Nocturn', the air is pushed out of your lungs as you cower helplessly before the crescendo. 'Aerial', meanwhile, is a totally unexpected ecstatic disco meltdown that could teach both Madonna and Alison Goldfrapp lessons in dancefloor abandon”.

Although Pitchfork did not rave about Aerial in their review, they did make some interesting observations about A Sky of Honey. In the same way The Ninth Wave is the best half of Hounds of Love, A Sky of Honey is the best half of Aerial. Masterpieces from the two Kate Bush albums she loved the most. Both featuring exceptional production from Bush. Showing her immense talent in both cases. A Sky of Honey might be her true peak in terms of production:

“The second disc (A Sky of Honey) seems a bit more adventurous, which is fitting given that it's a song-cycle on the natural ebb and flow of life and the seasons. Beginning with a "Prelude" and "Prologue", Bush eases into her most subtly symphonic music on record, backing herself with only piano and soft, modulating synth pulse. Her teasing lines, "it's gonna be so good," referring to the passing of summer into fall, are both poetic and playful, and fit perfectly the sense of effortless euphoria throughout the disc. Still, I might have wished for a bit more spark: "An Architect's Dream", "Sunset", and "Nocturn", despite maintaining the narrative of her concept, are a bit too steeped in uber-light adult contemporary sheen for my tastes. By the time of the closing title track, my ears are lightly glazed over, and its frail "rock" section does little justice to lines like "I want to be up on the roof, I feel I gotta get up on the roof!" At one point, Bush trades cackles with a bird's song, suggesting she's quite happy with her simple life as a mother and artist. Far be it from me to criticize happy endings, but in musical terms, a comfortable, even-keeled existence sometimes comes out as isolated and ordinary art”.

Maybe it could be called An Endless Sky of Honey. As per Wikipedia “In mid-May 2010, Aerial was released for the first time on iTunes. The second disc, A Sky of Honey, plays as one track, and its title was changed to An Endless Sky of Honey. Each track title is merged altogether on the sleeve. In August 2010, the CD version was reissued by Sony Legacy in the United States”. Even if A Sky of Honey does not have the same sense of progression and plot as The Ninth Wave, I think its strengths come from the visual possibilities. What Bush summons up with her lyrics, music and production. As we celebrate twenty years of Aerial on 7th November, I do think about its stunning second disc. How it was brought to the stage for Before the Dawn and it was majestic. However, it will never be shared with those who did not attend those gigs. Also, there are limitations with the stage in terms of sets, scenes and scope. You can achieve more and realise that suite better if you bring it to film or commit it to animation or some immersive experience. Maybe Kate Bush would not want a retread or reversion of what she conceptualised and brought to life in 2024. However, so potent and awe-inspiring are the songs on A Sky of Honey, I cannot help but think about it coming to life in a new way. It would be a popular short film or incredible visitor exhibition. If nothing happens, it is worth shining a light on the visual power of A Sky of Honey. How it is so filmic and cinematic. Despite no particular plot, we are journeying through a summer’s day and feeling the light change and nature come to life and then settle down as we go to the ocean. A Sky of Honey the gem of Aerial that…

OVERWHELMS the senses.

FEATURE: Humanity in Everything She Does: Kate Bush’s Present and Future

FEATURE:

 

 

Humanity in Everything She Does

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush at the Evening Standard Theatre Awards at the London Palladium on 30th November, 2014/PHOTO CREDIT: David M. Benett/Getty Images

Kate Bush’s Present and Future

__________

ON 17th September…

PHOTO CREDIT: Samir Hussein/WireImage for ABA

Kate Bush’s stunning animated short film, Little Shrew (Snowflake), was screened at the close of the  Together for Palestine concert at Wembley Arena. As Kate Bush News write, “Kate’s simple plea  over the end titles says it all...”. That plea is: “Please stop the killing and starvation of children in Gaza”. Whilst she obviously cares about all people affected in Gaza, she is thinking of the most vulnerable. At a time where genocide is affecting Palestine and very little is being done about it, it was great that we had a concert. Artists speaking about what is happening. The night of speeches and addresses from doctors and journalists working in Gaza saw Benedict Cumberbatch, Damon Albarn, Neneh Cherry, Jameela Jamil and others take to the stage. Brian Eno curated an event that raised over £1.5 million. The most moving moments came from Palestinian voices. It seemed like a powerful and vital evening that was the biggest show of unity for those who are being starved and murdered. We know that elected leaders are really not treating the genocide with the gravity is deserves. The music industry especially is speaking up and getting involved. Although Kate Bush was not in attendance, the fact that her Little Shrew (Snowflake) short film closed Together for Palestine at Wembley Arena was an incredibly beautiful moment. It just goes to show that Kate Bush is always trying to help those in need. I have written about this recently. However, as Little Shrew (Snowflake) did make a valuable contribution to Together for Palestine, it brings to mind how humanitarian concerns and charity are always dear to her heart. I am not going to repeat what I wrote recently.

Instead, I am thinking about how she is making this impact without releasing music. Her most recent output and publicity – if those are the right words?! – concerns Little Shew (Snowflake) and War Child. Helping to raise money for those affected by conflict and violence. Posting those simple and direct words at the end of the video that was shown recently shows that she is one of the most conscientious artists in the world. Not only when it comes to people caught up in genocide and war. Kate Bush has protested against the rise of A.I. and how that will negatively impact artists ad their rights. Wanting to protect their work and voices. It is typical of her to protect and speak for others. She has been doing that her whole career! It makes me think of her future. Of course, a new album is what everyone is hoping for. I do think that, whenever this arrives, humanity will be very much at the heart. I don’t think Kate Bush will release an album that is necessarily political. However, I feel that she cannot help but reflect what is happening right now. Her narrative will change. 2011’s 50 Words for Snow is fantastical and wintery. More about the impersonal and fictional, there are some real-life figures. However, it is an album that explores the rivers, cold, snow, mountains and wild. 2005’s Aerial was more personal in terms of family and her being a new mother. The second disc, A Sky of Honey, was about this summer’s day as we head through the night. This spiritual, escapist, sublime and cinematic suite. I do think a new album will have a different approach. It is going to more about those experiencing starvation and violence. The way the world is changing. Maybe not discussing it in a cold and tragic way, there will be beauty and hope.

The same goes for A.I. and what artists are facing. How there is this situation where artists can have their music and rights taken off of them. Bush will very much focus on subjects like this. Of course, there could well be her inimitable and distinct blend of inventiveness and imagination. That noted, I get the feeling the modern world and things she has spoken about will go into her music. This interesting article states how women in music are taking a bigger stand against the genocide in Palestine than male artists. Aside from the likes of Kneecap and Bob Vylan, it is women who are speaking out more. From Chappell Roan, CMAT, JADE and Renée Rapp, these artists are speaking up not only about genocide affecting so many Palestinians, but conflicts around the world. Including the ongoing massacre in Ukraine. Will Kate Bush add her voice to that? I don’t think explicitly, though I do feel there will be songs about devastation and conflict. I do always love when Kate Bush puts together a concept or takes a panoramic look at the world. It is hard to say what an eleventh studio album will contain. Given that Kate Bush is keen to put out messages against genocide and war and raise money for charities like War Child, that naturally will transition and translate into her music. I will write more about this later in the year. We are nearing the end of 2025. What do we have to look forward to? The twentieth anniversary of Aerial in November. Kate Bush’s Christmas message in December. It is unlikely we will get any new music news. Despite that, I feel 2026 will be the year when she announces an album, as it would have been over fourteen years at that point. Kate Bush has always been about love and humanity. However, the past year or so has seen her really getting involved and doing all that she can. This will continue into next year. It proves once and for all that, when it comes to Kate Bush, she truly is…

AN amazing and inspiring human being.

FEATURE: Let Me Be Myself: Halsey, The Great Impersonator and Label Restrictions

FEATURE:

 

 

Let Me Be Myself

PHOTO CREDIT: Guel Sener

Halsey, The Great Impersonator and Label Restrictions

__________

I will not write a lot…

about this, but a piece of music news caught my eye and shocked me. One of the best albums of last year came from Halsey. The Great Impersonator is a remarkable album. Ahead of its release, Halsey posted on Instagram her impersonating a different icon every day and teasing a snippet of the song they inspired. It was a case of incredible artists such as Kate Bush, Tori Amos, Cher and Aaliyah being paid tribute to. Halsey written songs, not so much in their voice. Though there was definitely influence. However, one would think that this album and the praise it received would lead to a quick follow up. As we discover from NME, the label, Columbia, has held Halsey back from making a new album:

“Halsey has claimed she is “not allowed” to make a new album yet, because ‘The Great Impersonator’ didn’t perform as well commercially as her label had hoped.

The singer-songwriter released her fifth studio effort last October, earning her a glowing five-star review from NME and being named one of our best albums of 2024. It peaked at Number 19 in the UK albums chart, and Number Two in the US Billboard 200.

During a new interview with Apple Music 1, Halsey reflected on the expectations of success from the industry, and being compared to major pop acts like Taylor Swift and Ariana Grande.

“I can’t make an album right now,” she told host Zane Lowe. “I’m not allowed to. I can’t make an album right now.”

She went on to discuss “the reality” of her current situation, after “‘The Great Impersonator’ didn’t perform the way [her label, Columbia] thought it was going to”.

Halsey added: “And if I’m being honest with you, the album sold a hundred thousand fucking copies first week. That’s a pretty big first week, especially for an artist who hasn’t had a hit in a long time. The tour is the highest-selling tour of my entire career.”

The artist then claimed that her team “want ‘Manic’ numbers from me”, referring to her 2020 third record – which shifted 239,000 units in its first week. “Everyone wants ‘Manic’ numbers from me,” she said. “I can’t do that every single time. It should be good enough that I do it once in a while, but it’s not.”

Halsey told Lowe that selling 100,000 copies in the first week was seen as “a failure in the context of the kind of success that I’ve had previously”, but said it “would be considered a success for most artists”.

She continued: “And that’s the hardest part, I think, of having been a pop star once. Because I’m not one anymore, but I’m being compared to numbers and to other people that I don’t consider lateral to me. You know what I mean?”.

It makes me think that artists, especially women, are discouraged from making albums that are not seen as mainstream or Pop-heavy. If you are a major artist like Halsey and put every ounce of yourself into an album, the reward should be that you are given freedom to do whatever you want. It is ironic that some of the artists Halsey was impersonating on her 2024 faced similar blowback from labels. Kate Bush released The Dreaming in 1982 and there were reservations from EMI. Experimental and unconventional, Halsey told Zane Lowe that she is almost expected to write Taylor Swift numbers. Write music like she used to or what is seen as popular now: “If you actually compared me to the other types of artists who are making the type of music that I am making, I’m fucking killing it. But that’s not what I’m up against. And because of that, I’m at the bottom of a category that I’m not in anymore, when I should be at the top of a category that I’m in now. And it’s hard”. This might be something affecting women more. If they start out making Pop and then do something more personal and less commercial, there is that pressure to go back to the centre. Labels are still about albums making money and units. Regardless of whether The Great Impersonator sold well and was a chart success, it was not as massive as albums by artists like Taylor Swift. Halsey almost killed herself with The Great Impersonator and it was this amazing concept album that was so different and more interesting than anything around it.

It is so discouraging and insulting to artists that do release music that is not deemed purely mainstream or profitable. Halsey has been releasing music for over a decade. She has released incredible music and has this enormous fanbase. The Great Impersonator is her fifth studio album and I think that it is her best. Something that Halsey was very keen to do and pushed herself to the limits to make it as good as she could, it is almost seen as tokenism. Doing that one album that is not purely Pop. An artist getting something off of their chest and then coming back to where they should be. It raises questions about how labels view their talent. Whether what Halsey has experienced is common to others. Instead of giving her carte blanche after putting out an album as original and incredible as The Great Impersonator, there is this financial motivation. Looking at major Pop artists and what they are doing and guiding Halsey in that direction. It did really annoy me. More than that, it opens up discussions around women in music. How there are these limitations placed on them. Maybe an expectation to be a certain thing. Halsey releases this amazing album that took her in a new direction. Rather than it being this huge new chapter where she is allowed to do what she feels fit, she is being held back. It does call into question that she does next. How long it takes for a new album. An irony with the success of The Great Impersonator is that Columbia are not allowing the iconic Halsey to…

BE herself.

FEATURE: A Much Needed Offering from the Queen of Pop… Madonna and a Confessions on a Dance Floor Sequel

FEATURE:

 

 

A Much Needed Offering from the Queen of Pop…

PHOTO CREDIT: Madonna

Madonna and a Confessions on a Dance Floor Sequel

__________

I am going to include…

some features about Confessions on a Dance Floor. That Madonna album was released on 9th November, 2005. The tenth studio album from the Queen of Pop, it was a huge success. Following 2003’s American Life, which received mixed reviews, this was a change of direction. Less political and agitated, for Confessions on a Dance Floor, Madonna took guidance from 1970s Disco and 1980s Electropop, as well as 2000s Club music. Artists like ABBA and Bee Gees at the heart of the music. A number one success in multiple countries around the world, it was one of Madonna’s most successful albums. It won acclaim from critics. It was not a rare sound from Madonna. Her 1983 eponymous debut album contained Dance influences. Ray of Light (1998) had its moments of Club and Dance influences too. Since 2005, Madonna has released a string of albums. Nothing really like Confessions on a Dance Floor. Other artists have come and gone regarding putting out amazing Dance albums with the same mix of inspiration. Kylie Minogue remains. Albums from het in 2000, 2001 and 2023 very much have Disco and Dance at the core. Although there has been a rise in albums that have been influenced by Disco and Dance, the announcement of Madonna planning to follow up on the 2005 album has delighted fans. Confessions on a Dance Floor part two will arrive next year. It is a perfect time for this album announcement. With the world in a horrendous state of affairs, I think many artists are reacting with music that is uplifting.

Not that it is on their shoulders to counteract the gloom and violence that we are seeing. However, artists like Madonna declaring that they are going to follow an album like Confessions on a Dance Floor is a major high. People will be curious whether it sticks to the template of the 2005 album in terms of the influences or goes in a different direction. I am going to spend some time with Confessions on a Dance Floor. As it turns twenty on 14th November, there will be a lot of affection for Confessions on a Dance Floor then. Albumism marked fifteen years of a modern classic in 2020:

“Smashing through the ‘80s and ‘90s with hit after hit, Madonna ended the 20th century with the incredibly beautiful and introspective Ray of Light (1998) and saw in the new millennium with yet another career defining moment in Music (2000). It wasn’t until the highly controversial and somewhat provocative American Life (2003) that Madonna faced critical backlash, something that she had faced before, but this felt different. Politically driven, but ultimately missing its mark, American Life needed a successor, one that eventually came in the form of Confessions on a Dance Floor in late 2005.

Madonna’s knack for reinvention is beyond compare and on Confessions, her tenth studio album, she again didn’t fail to disappoint. The album’s heavy disco feel, a genre that her music was almost born out of, allowed Madonna to lose the seriousness of her previous album and get playful again, both with fashion and her music. Remembering the misogynistic conversations surrounding her appearance and that leotard for “Hung Up,” the then 47-year-old Madonna was again showing why she was (and is) a force to be reckoned with: she has never been restricted by boundaries that prevent others from achieving what essentially she sets out to achieve. No matter what the reaction may be.

As the album’s lead single “Hung Up” danced through the airwaves with its impeccable sampling of ABBA’s 1979 single “Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight),” with the introduction of Madonna’s new co-producer Stuart Price giving the singer a freedom and unabashed moment at disco glory, and she was reveling in it. The album’s following three singles—“Sorry,” “Get Together” and “Jump” —continue Price’s foray into disco pop territory and whilst they may not be groundbreaking, Madonna brings her updated version of disco into the 2000s and it works, ensuring that all four singles charted in the top ten somewhere around the world.

Whilst “Future Lovers” continues the dance vibe that borders on a religious exercise in clubbing, this quickly fades with the cringe-worthy “I Love New York.” With lines like “I don’t like cities but I like New York / Other cities make me feel like a dork,” the listener is left wondering if the latter part of the album can regain its momentum. It kind of does. Moving into “Let It Will Be” where she speaks about fame and herself, the uptempo beat is what keeps the quasi spiritual song interesting. In fact, it’s this “spiritual” awakening that seems to take over the rest of the album.

Spiritual exploration and Madonna have been as intertwined as any other aspect of the singer, but it is on “Isaac” that Madonna’s foray into Kabbalah is brought to the forefront. The song was accused of blasphemy, but as Yitzhak Sinwani (one of Madonna’s early spiritual “Kabbalah” guides) sings in Aramaic, the words, when translated into English, are more a symbol of heaven and angels rather than an ode to Kabbalah. “I toyed with the idea of calling the song “Fear of Flying,” because it’s about letting go and people who are afraid to fly obviously have control issues,” Madonna explained to Billboard in 2005. “We all have fears in many areas of our lives. Some people can’t commit to relationships. The song is about tackling all of that. ‘Will you sacrifice your comfort? Make your way in a foreign land?’ In other words, will you go outside of your comfort zone?”.

Even though Classic Pop were not entirely full of praise for Confessions on a Dance Floor, I did want to select some sections from their review. I am going to end with a couple of reviews for this masterful album. They wrote how “It’s feel-good fun, but sonically, it’s one of Madonna’s most reserved, conservative and safe records. Beyond the four massive hit singles and some other choice cuts, Confessions… does feel rather padded out in the middle third”:

“Unlike her recent offerings up to that point, Confessions… eschews the profound artistic statements, preferring (mostly) to let the music do the talking.

At no point does it attempt to reinvent the wheel; it simply replaces the wheel with a glistening mirrorball, sets the tempo to 120bpm and boogies until the lights come up.

The perennial queen of reinvention, Madge remains adamant never to repeat herself. Each new record is a reaction against the last, and this was very much the case with Confessions On A Dance Floor.

Its predecessor, 2003’s American Life, was an abrasive, political diatribe on the state of the nation, set to an electroclash/folktronica soundscape.

Born in the post-911 landscape, it was intentionally confrontational, to an extent weighed down by its own sense of importance and overly fussy production.

But one thing we’ve all since learned from lockdown is that when the world is crumbling around you, sales of chocolate bars soar ten-fold.

In other words, we don’t always need reminding of the doom and gloom; sometimes you just need to bring a little joy into your life.

While you can hardly call a multi-million selling, Grammy-nominated worldwide No.1 album a flop (a Madonna misfire still causes an avalanche), the message of American Life didn’t quite resonate with the mood of the time in the way she might have expected.

In stark contrast, Confessions… is an upbeat and uplifting breath of fresh air, a notably lighter and more care-free collection, more concerned with making you dance than making you think.

This shift is apparent in how Madonna self-censors herself on I Love New York proclaiming “You can eff off!” – in comparison to the uncensored and repeated “Fuck it!” that opens American Life.

Unlike her recent offerings up to that point, Confessions… eschews the profound artistic statements, preferring (mostly) to let the music do the talking.

At no point does it attempt to reinvent the wheel; it simply replaces the wheel with a glistening mirrorball, sets the tempo to 120bpm and boogies until the lights come up.

The perennial queen of reinvention, Madge remains adamant never to repeat herself. Each new record is a reaction against the last, and this was very much the case with Confessions On A Dance Floor.

Its predecessor, 2003’s American Life, was an abrasive, political diatribe on the state of the nation, set to an electroclash/folktronica soundscape.

Born in the post-911 landscape, it was intentionally confrontational, to an extent weighed down by its own sense of importance and overly fussy production.

But one thing we’ve all since learned from lockdown is that when the world is crumbling around you, sales of chocolate bars soar ten-fold.

In other words, we don’t always need reminding of the doom and gloom; sometimes you just need to bring a little joy into your life.

While you can hardly call a multi-million selling, Grammy-nominated worldwide No.1 album a flop (a Madonna misfire still causes an avalanche), the message of American Life didn’t quite resonate with the mood of the time in the way she might have expected.

In stark contrast, Confessions… is an upbeat and uplifting breath of fresh air, a notably lighter and more care-free collection, more concerned with making you dance than making you think.

This shift is apparent in how Madonna self-censors herself on I Love New York proclaiming “You can eff off!” – in comparison to the uncensored and repeated “Fuck it!” that opens American Life”.

I am going to finish with a review from The Guardian. They awarded Confessions on a Dance Floor four stars. There were many who felt like Madonna had a point to prove in 2005. American Life did not get great reviews and was seen as an unwise move. Confessions on a Dance Floor was very much a statement of intent. A reinvention that she is following up next year:

“The booklet that accompanies Madonna's 11th album features a handful of lyrics, apparently written in the singer's own hand. They come from a song called Let It Will Be. The clunking title sounds like something Noel Gallagher might proffer on a bad day, the arrangement features strings that recall Papa Don't Preach. Divorced from the music, one scrawled line stands out: "I'm at the point of no return."

It certainly fits with the thought-provoking yoga position Mrs Ritchie adopts in the photograph - ankles miles above her head, a mirrorball between her feet - but those of an analytical bent might read it as a comment on her recent career. Her last album, 2003's American Life, was her worst-selling: confused music, solipsistic lyrics, an unintentionally comic cover, featuring Madonna clad in the kind of Che chic that for Britons of a certain age invariably invokes not the guerrillero heroico of the Cuban revolution, but Citizen Smith of the Tooting Popular Front. It still sold millions - for the world's most famous woman, failure is relative - but damaged her reputation enough to warrant a little sticker on its follow-up's case, alerting punters to its contents: NON-STOP ALL-DANCE TOUR-DE-FORCE.

It's a long time since Madonna has needed a circus barker to drum up business. Confessions on a Dancefloor began life as the soundtrack to a film script she was working on. There's a Pavlovian response: it's impossible to see "film script" and "Madonna" in the same sentence without feeling your spirits plunge. And whenever Madonna gets mixed up with soundtracks, the results are usually unforgettable - and not in a good way: her disco version of Don't Cry for Me Argentina, her catastrophic Dick Tracy-inspired forays into swing. Nevertheless, Confessions on a Dancefloor is the result of ruthless stock-taking.

Producer Mirwais's chief collaborator role has been downsized: he may have only escaped le sac altogether by coming up with Future Lovers, a corrosive homage to Donna Summer's I Feel Love. His replacement is an inspired appointment. The album's title, sticker and format - each track segueing breathlessly into the next as if mixed by a DJ - suggest Madonna's desire to reconnect with her past as an early-1980s club diva and her devoted gay fanbase.

Has she ever come to the right place. If Stuart Price's obsession with the 1980s were any more pronounced, he'd be travelling to gigs in a Sinclair C5; suffice to say that Darkdancer, his 1999 album as Les Rhythmes Digitales, featured Nik Kershaw. More curiously, he may be Britain's most metrosexual producer. As Pour Homme, he released Born This Way, which sampled Carl Bean's out-and-proud disco anthem ("I'm happy! I'm carefree! I'm gay!"). His remixes have made the Scissor Sisters sound even more gay, a remarkable feat. Advance notice of what he could do with Madonna was served by the joyous, Abba-sampling Hung Up, a single that could theoretically have been more camp, but only with the addition of Liza Minnelli on backing vocals and lyrics about Larry Grayson's friend Everard.

If Price can't stop Madonna writing songs that tell you fame isn't all it's cracked up to be in a way that suggests she thinks she's the first person to work this out, he can summon up more than enough sonic trickery to distract you. There are hulking basslines, fizzing synthesisers, rolling tablas on Push and an unlikely combination of frantic double-bass riffing, Goldfrapp-ish glam stomp and acoustic guitar filigree on the closing Like It or Not, a collaboration with Swedish pop songwriters Bloodshy and Avant. Isaac falls flat, its lyrics about Kabbalah teacher Isaac Freidin married to global-village trance makes you think of Australian backpackers dancing badly at beach parties in Goa - but elsewhere, the songwriting sparkles. The choruses of Get Together and Sorry are triumphant. I Love New York may be the most agreeably ridiculous thing Madonna has ever released: timpani, a riff stolen from the Stooges' I Wanna Be Your Dog and a Lou Reed deadpan.

It may be a return to core values, but there's still a bravery about Confessions on a Dancefloor. It revels in the delights of wilfully plastic dance pop in an era when lesser dance-pop artists - from Rachel Stevens to Price's protege Juliet - are having a desperately thin time of it. It homages the DJ mix album, a format long devalued by computer-generated cash-in compilations. It flies in fashion's face with a swaggering hint of only-I-can-do-this: "If you don't like my attitude," she suggests on I Love New York, "then you can eff-off." Dancing queens of every variety should be delighted”.

It is good that we get to hear a follow-up to Confessions on a Dance Floor. Whether it is going to have another title or there will be this further evolution. Fans have reacted with a lot of love to Madonna preparing to release a sequel. Since 2005, many queens of music have offered incredible albums with Disco, Dance and Club music at the heart of things. However, Madonna’s Confessions on a Dance Floor is this incredibly special album that inspired so many other artists. At an especially bleak time in history, her announcement has provided some positivity and joy. We will wait to see what comes from her…

NEXT year.

FEATURE: Pulp’s Different Class at Thirty: Inside the Sublime Disco 2000

FEATURE:

 

 

Pulp’s Different Class at Thirty

Inside the Sublime Disco 2000

__________

I have written a feature…

about Pulp’s Different Class, as it turns thirty on 30th October. The band’s fifth studio album is considered their very best. Instead of doing another general feature, instead I am going to focus on my favourite song from the album. Disco 2000 was the third single from Different Class, released on 27th November, 1995. I can celebrate the thirtieth anniversary of the album and the single. A huge song that was a big part of my childhood. I was twelve when the track came out, so I can remember listening to it at high school. To mark this song and the approaching thirtieth anniversary of Different Class, I am going to get to some features. A single that reached number seven in the U.K., Disco 2000 is frequently ranked alongside the best songs of the 1990s. Jarvis Cocker, Russell Senior, Mark Webber, Candida Doyle, Steve Mackey and Nick Banks created a masterpiece. One of many from Different Class. I am going to come some critical perspectives of Disco 2000. An obvious single that is sometimes overshadowed by the might and genius of the lead single, Common People, I have a particular fondness for Disco 2000. I think it was the song that drew me to Common People. One that I can listen to over and over again. I am going to start out with this article from Cult Following, as we get to discover the meaning behind a Pulp classic. Fans probably know the story. However, for those who do not, the below provides some insight and revelation:

“The song is one of Pulp’s best-known releases and sits alongside Common People, Sorted for E’s & Wizz, and Something Changed on their monumental Different Class. Though many are still trying to figure out the mystery figure mentioned in the anthemic Common People, the origins of Disco 2000 proved to be as interesting. Cocker shared all in an interview with Daniel Rachel, which featured in their book, The Art of Noise. The Pulp frontman confirmed it was the “futuristic,” far-off feel of the year 2000 which inspired the song and that the song itself is based on a true story.

The Deborah mentioned in the hit song was Deborah Bone, the mental health nurse who was honoured in the 2015 New Year’s Honours. She died on December 30, 2014, the day her MBE was announced.

Cocker said of the song: “The phrase Disco 2000 I liked. We’d done a party when I was at art college and I’d done some slides on very early computer technology that said Disco 2000 on them. That idea when I was a kid, the year 2000 seemed the most futuristic thing ever. The year 2000 was looming and it had seemed mind-blowing to me as a kid that I’d be alive in the year 2000 and we would be in space and I’d be there and wasn’t that incredible.

“It was very naive to think that now. It was 1995 and the millennium was only five years away and I thought, ‘This is a very upfront song: what subject could go with that?’ It seemed to me that a lot of people of my generation had that feeling and maybe you would have that thing of saying when you left school, ‘We’ll never forget each other and we’ll all meet up in the year 2000.’

“I guess a lot of people made pacts and it never happened. In the case of the fountain that I wrote about in that song, Sheffield Council didn’t help by actually removing it in 1998. So it physically couldn’t happen even if people had remembered to do it.

“Then it was memories of a true story of a girl who was born at the same time as me, and my mum was in the same maternity ward as hers, and we ended up going to the same school.”

The legendary frontman has since discussed the origins of the song’s message, saying he “fancied” Deborah “for ages”. He said: “There was a girl called Deborah—she was born in the same hospital as me. Not within an hour—I think it was like three hours—but you can’t fit three hours into the song without having to really rush the singing!

“But basically you know the whole thing was the same—I fancied her for ages and then she started to become a woman and her breasts began to sprout so then all the boys fancied her then. I didn’t stand a ‘cat-in-hell’s chance’. But then I did use to sometimes hang around outside her house and stuff like that”.

I am going to get to another feature from Cult Following soon. In fact, a review of the song. Before getting to that, it is worth bringing in some other reviews. Just a sprinkling of what critics think of the immense Disco 2000. Nostalgic for those like me who were around in 1995 as children and discovered the song fresh. As Pulp are touring and recently released an album, More, there is this opportunity for younger fans to hear this song on the stage:

“Disco 2000" has seen critical acclaim and has been labeled by many as one of Pulp's greatest songs. Stephen Thomas Erlewine of AllMusic praised its "glitzy, gaudy stomp." James Masterton for Dotmusic said it "is easily the best track from the Different Class album, the closest they have ever come to an out-and-out pop stormer and certainly a floor-filler at office parties this holiday with its chorus of 'Let's all meet up in the year 2000/Won't it be strange when we're all fully grown.'" A reviewer from Music Week rated it three out of five, adding, "A bouncing disco beat, based on the riff from Laura Branigan's 'Gloria,' sees a pumped-up Pulp and Jarvis doing his usual talking bit. But it may disappoint fans of their recent epics." Simon Price from Melody Maker named it Single of the Week, writing, "But 'Disco 2000', like 'Pink Glove' before it, shows that what fuels his vindictive bitterness is actually a deep romanticism”.

I actually found this review from The Refined Cowboy. For so many people, Disco 2000 has deep personal connections and significance. Though it is part of the larger picture that is Different Class, there is this singular, distinct and powerful energy from the song that connects on a deeper level. Such a thrill that the band who created this track over thirty years ago are still together and can play Disco 2000 is a gift:

“At the time of its release it reached a respectable number 7 in the charts, but was bit of a second fiddle to its more popular number 2 achieving sibling Common People. Of course like most chart followers, it was Common People that introduced me to the band, seeing them for the first time ever on Channel 4’s morning zoo show The Big Breakfast. Not only was the song one of the best catchy numbers of the decade, but the video had me mesmerised – simultaneously dealing with themes of class and dating with a twinge of sadness from Jarvis Cocker’s voice, it all also seemed like so much fun as he explored the aisles of a hyper-colourful supermarket worthy of an LSD version of Repo Man. It told us that we could continue being 90s cynical youths, but from now on we could do it AND have some fun.

While Common People may have enjoyed more of the glory back then, it is easily Disco 2000 that trumps my personal chart today. Its sad, sentimental tone contradicts its fun, upbeat music, encouraging some serious (okay, maybe not that serious) social and existential thoughts while on the dance floor. Often concerned with matters of class in British society, with Disco 2000 Pulp channels the same sort of feelings and applies them to your awkward teen years, which is essentially the class struggle for kids.
​While Common People may have enjoyed more of the glory back then, it is easily Disco 2000 that trumps my personal chart today. Its sad, sentimental tone contradicts its fun, upbeat music, encouraging some serious (okay, maybe not that serious) social and existential thoughts while on the dance floor. Often concerned with matters of class in British society, with Disco 2000 Pulp channels the same sort of feelings and applies them to your awkward teen years, which is essentially the class struggle for kids.

For me however, connection with the tragic narrative aside, it mostly brings back memories of Saturday afternoons in town. The entire music video is framed, which really made it stand out at the time (and maybe even still today?), and I can’t help but recall weekend trips to the record store in Bangor, where I’d always see the Pulp VHS collection of videos on display, the cover opting for the same design as the Disco 2000 music video, which has one of the best titles of all time - Sorted for films and vids, a play on their controversial song Sorted for E’s and Wizz.

What would my future bring? Would I be poor? Alone? A social outcast? For a teenager in 1995 the year 2000 was impossibly far away, another lifetime almost, and often felt like it would never really come. As anticipation for the turn of the millennium grew, hopes, expectations and opportunities moved on, and Disco 2000 became nothing but a dance we once went to ‘on that damp and lonely Thursday years ago’. 

I will end with that review from Cult Following. A lot of people will be writing about Different Class ahead of its thirtieth anniversary on 30th October. A startling album that still sounds incredible relevant and powerful to this day, everyone has their own favourite song from Different Class. For me, it will always be the towering and captivating Disco 2000:

“Listeners to the seminal classic Disco 2000 will all have their very own fountain down the road. Whether it is that literal waterworks or a town centre their dad put the streetlights in, it matters not. Pulp crafted an anthem for the ages – one of the finest tracks put to tape – and their recent tour is surplus to the argument of its genius. The classic Different Class single has found a form of its own in recent years, an essential club and pub track which filters through on gloomy days as a shining light in an otherwise feeble disaster of a day. It is the lust and love featured within from the out-of-the-loop protagonist Jarvis Cocker writes himself into which marks Disco 2000 as a world-beating track of defiance meeting distress.

From a guitar riff recognised around the globe to a desire to recall the glory days from Cocker’s exceptional lyrics of longing for a woman who moved on far sooner than his protagonist did, Disco 2000 is a lightning-in-a-bottle moment. Brief spats of repetition, the cavalcade of usual Pulp stylings and the sexed-up presentation of all those years ago through the glittering eye of nostalgia – the hopeful claims they were on the verge of big plans decades before, it comes together wonderfully.

Life comes at you fast and for the lyrics Cocker puts out here, from being a mess at school to being friends but never more, Disco 2000 hits through not just as a track for the left-field losers painted as Pulp fans but for the generations after it. An anthemic classic in every sense of the word for its easy-to-access hooks, and its booming chorus which charms and writhes in the guilt and fear of meeting up with old pals. Collect those memories, the oohs and aahs of how everyone around you has grown – not that it’s any of your business anyway. Disco 2000 is a song which survives on its own, far away from the album of course but it lives on as a perfect example of Pulp quality.

Cocker was right all along. It is strange now we’re all fully grown. You aren’t the same as you are in your youth. Disco 2000 is an essential piece of work not just for the Pulp discography, not just for the 1990s indie spectrum of work but for the shift in tone a genre can take. To turn it on its head as Pulp did with this is beyond the pale. A gift of a track – and Pulp has plenty of those”.

I am going to wrap things up here. It is sad that the inspiration behind Disco 2000, Deborah Bone, died in 2015. However, she is part of music history. A song that is among the standouts of Different Class. On 30th October, it turns thirty. I recall when it came out in 1995. Maybe one of my very earliest experiences of Pulp. I loved Disco 2000 back in 1995 and now, three decades on, it remains in my head and heart! I wanted to show affection for…

A true classic.

FEATURE: Swap Our Places: The Exploration and Examination of Gender Roles in Kate Bush’s Music

FEATURE:

 

 

Swap Our Places

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1985/PHOTO CREDIT: Guido Harari

The Exploration and Examination of Gender Roles in Kate Bush’s Music

__________

THAT might sound like…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1978/PHOTO CREDIT: Gered Mankowitz

a vague and ambiguous title for a feature. We have not long ended the celebration of Hounds of Love. That was released on 16th September, 1985, so we marked forty years of a masterpiece. It was great seeing all of the posts and features about the album. I am going to come to it in a minute. Not only because one of its very best singles turns forty very soon. Also, in terms of how Bush discusses gender and the role it plays is hugely important. I wanted to start out with A.I.-generated information when I searched for ‘the role of gender in Kate Bush’s music’:

“Kate Bush's work explores gender roles and femininity through narrative perspectives, exploring universal experiences like the desire for mutual understanding in "Running Up That Hill" and the fear of female power in "Wuthering Heights". Her music often features metamorphoses and explorations of the monstrous or esoteric, challenging traditional notions of the self and creating space for polymorphous feminine identity. Additionally, her career itself—achieved through fiercely independent production and a focus on her artistic vision—served as an inspiration for other women in the male-dominated music industry to be strong and follow their own paths”.

There are so many different angles to explore. There have been some interesting and thought-provoking articles written about gender in Kate Bush’s music. It is complex and fascinating. How Bush is a writer who is empathetic. Sympathetic and compassionate, she definitely has this adoration for and curiosity of men. Listen to songs on The Kick of Life, her 1978 debut, and you can find examples of sympathy and longing. Wuthering Heights casting Cathy as this frightening and strange ghostly figure. Maybe showing sympathy with Heathcliff in the song. The Man with the Child in His Eyes is about the child-like quality men possess, even in later life. Bush never coming at things like a conventional Pop artist. Not only did she have this respect and admiration for men, when many female artists were talking about heartbreak and the pains of romance, Bush was coming from a different angle.

Bush never would call herself a feminist, though she always wrote from an empowering position. Positive and strong, she was also vulnerable and open. Inspiring to so many female artists because of the extraordinary way she broke barriers and was groundbreaking. She used female voice and narratives to explore various identities and tell stories in ways that were radical for the time. Bush had this very positive view of men. It did not only extend to writing about them in a very fair and compassionate way. This was rare for any artist. Writing about the opposite sex without any anger or insult. Some might say this is naïve or lacks balance, though it is Bush’s ability to empathise and put herself in their position that stands out. Bush took this further by exploring gender roles and lowering her voice. Songs on Hounds of Love where her voice was pitched down to give this male tone. Hounds of Love a very masculine and percussion-driven album. Whilst most albums employs cymbals, Hounds of Love is about the beats and depth of percussion. The Dreaming is too. I think that her guttural and lower vocals were not affectation. More, they were Bush giving herself a more masculine tone. Think of a song like Ran Tan Waltz. That was the B-side of 1980’s Army Dreamers (from Never for Ever). The live performance for her 1979 Christmas special is the only live outing for the song, it sees Bush dressed as a male chimney sweep. This is what Dreams of Orgonon observed about Ran Tan Waltz:

“She often writes about issues concerning women from a man’s point of view, a subgenre of Bush songs which is going to culminate in Never for Ever’s most famous single. It’s a strange pathology of hers, one that sets her as a rare woman in a tradition of masculine songwriting, but it often allows for interestingly fractured views of gender. In the case of “Mr. Mom: Kurt Weill Edition,” Bush destroys the nuclear family. The mother is a playgirl while the father stays home and takes care of the baby. This is Bush’s model of desire-from-a-distant played through a Feydeau farce: everything becomes dirty and obscene, even romantic relationships”.

In the video for Army Dreamers, from Never for Ever, Bush casts herself as a young solider in the battlefield. Maybe imagining herself as a teenager fighting in a war they are not prepared for. Was this Kate Bush being maternal? However, it was a case of Bush putting herself in a young man’s shoes. The lure of war, but also the futility. When other women might have attacked war and the men in power, Bush seems to swap places and comes at it from the viewpoint of the young men who lose their lives. There are multiple examples of Bush exploring gender roles and relationships through Hounds of Love. Moments where she does pitch her voice down. Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) explores gender swapping in order to foster empathy, as she imagined a couple exchanging roles to understand each other's perspectives better. The track is about how men and women could better understand one another if they swapped places. This was very uncommon for a female Pop artist in the 1980s. Or a male artist. That idea of rather than conflict and dividing genders, bringing them together and switching positions to explore empathy, understanding and compassion.

Bush was raised in a house with two older brothers. Her father was a very important figure. Maybe that influence was why she was fascinated with the male perspective and her adopting a masculine vocal or guise at various points. Perhaps an artist like David Bowie and his transformations influenced her too. How he blurred gender lines and how he was challenging and normalising gender nonconformity and expression outside traditional binaries. Look at the video for Cloudbusting. The video sees Kate Bush star alongside Donald Sutherland. She casts herself as Peter, the young son of Wilhelm Reich. Rather than cast an actor to play that role, she cast herself. Again, Bush maybe going against the grain. When women were expected to be feminine and sexy and dress in a certain way, playing a male role in a video would have opened eyes and shocked people! Maybe a slight diversion, I want to bring sections of this article from Leah Kardos. Her recent book for 33 1/3 of Hounds of Love is a compelling read:

“In particular, it was the commercial triumph of Hounds Of Love that cleared a path for future would-be innovators who now had less to fear from being labelled ‘eccentric’ or ‘hysterical’ by the misogynistic rock press. British songwriter and producer Imogen Heap cited Bush as being one of the reasons labels took her work seriously, saying, ‘Kate produced some truly outstanding music in an era dominated by men and gave us gals a licence to not just be “a bird who could sing and write a bit”, which was the attitude of most execs.’

Bush’s music also broke ground in the way that it created space for polymorphous feminine imagination. The gender transgression of ‘Running Up That Hill’, the animal metamorphoses in ‘Get Out of My House’ and ‘Aerial’, empathy for the monstrous in ‘Wild Man’, the esotericism of ‘Lily’ and the metaphysical ‘Jig of Life’ suggested the possibility of extending and transcending one’s experience. Author and music critic Ann Powers wrote about how Bush’s imagistic songwriting pushed the limits of what was possible to feel and be:

‘[In Kate Bush’s music] I’d discovered what every teenager immersed in music craves: a voice that spoke from what felt like the inside of my own head, but with total self-confidence … And what she sang about! Demon lovers. Spiritual raptures. Ghosts at the window. Her songs were deeply feminine high nerdery made into loud, obnoxious art rock. And the best part was, like me, she didn't want to stay in her body’”.

Cloudbusting turns forty on 14th October, so it got me thinking more about gender in Kate Bush’s music. How she played a boy in the video. Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) sees Bush and her dance partner, Michael Hervieu, almost dressed the same. Hervieu underwent gender reassignment surgery and is now called Micha. This adds new weight and perspective to the song and its messages. Think too about This Woman’s Work that appears on 1989’s The Sensual World. Originally included in the film, She’s Having a Baby, in 1988, this iconic track “explores the gendered burdens of responsibility, particularly through the male perspective of a father witnessing his wife's life-threatening labor, highlighting the woman's resilience and the traditional societal confinement of "women's work”. This is what Kate Bush said in a 1989 interview about the male in This Woman’s Work: “He has no choice. There he is, he’s not a kid any more; you can see he’s in a very grown-up situation. And he starts, in his head, going back to the times they were together”. Kate Bush tackling gender roles and traditional narratives. Casting herself in male roles, feet and bodies. Maybe in a male-dominated industry, some might say this was Kate Bush trying to stand out or be heard. Others saying it is un-feminist. Bush grew up around very strong male figures. Even if Bush expresses a more feminine perspective and charge on The Sensual World, that is not to say she abandoned her ideals and sympathy (and empathy) for men. She stated in interviews how she identified more with male artists. Writing about them with respect and understanding, rather than antagonism, she also explored gender through her lyrics and videos. I may not have done full justice regarding this subject, and there might be a book or thesis in this. So fascinating and interesting exploring men, the male voice and the importance of swapping places and sharing experiences. More and more reason to love…

THIS woman’s world and work.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Revisited: Emma-Jean Thackray

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight: Revisited

PHOTO CREDIT: Lewis Vorn

Emma-Jean Thackray

__________

THE incredible…

and super talented Emma-Jean Thackray has a run of dates coming up that takes her around the world. Her new album, Weirdo, has been nominated for a Mercury Prize this year and most be among the frontrunners. I am going to end with a review for an album which has earned acclaimed across the board. If you do not know about Thackray, then I would first suggest checking out Grounding with Emma-Jean Thackray and her experiences with ADHD, OCD and autism and how this has affected her world of intrusive thoughts and also shaped her next album. Thackray is a giant of London's Jazz scene, a BBC Jazz FM award-winning artist for her debut album, Yellow, and she also runs her own label, Movementt. She has collaborated with major artists and institutions, including the London Symphony Orchestra. In terms of pedigree and talented, there are few as respected and reputable as the great Emma-Jean Thackray. I am revisiting her after I spotlighted her back in 2020. Five years is a long time, so there are a few more recent interviews I want to get to. I am going to concentrate on interviews from this year. A more up-to-date look at Emma-Jean Thackray. I will start out with Fifteen Questions and their interview. There are some interesting observations and answers that I wanted to highlight:

“When did you first consciously start getting interested in singing? What was your first performance as a singer on stage or in the studio and what was the experience like?

I sang as a small child. I was always walking around singing little songs that I made up, and my parents would get very annoyed, constantly telling me to be quiet.

I actually don’t remember my first time singing on stage or in the studio; I feel like it’s just something I’ve always done.

What were some of the main challenges in your development as a singer/vocalist? Which practices, exercises, or teachers were most helpful in reaching your goals – were there also “harmful” ones?

I think the hardest thing to have control of is your intonation. I think a lot of singers can focus too much on the ‘emotional’ side of performance (in pop / rock etc) and forget that you should have complete control of your voice as an instrument.

I think it’s great to transcribe other singers and match them exactly - every syllable, every phrase, and blend with them perfectly.

What are the things you hear in a voice when listening to a vocalist? What moves you in the voices of other singers?

I’m listening for their technique, their intonation, how they’re using vibrato, how they’re leaning into different syllables for different effects. I’m listening to their mouth / tongue position and how that changes the sound. I’m listening to all the minutia of what goes into a performance; that’s how you convey emotion and capture the listener.

What moves me is a singer who has total control of their voice, and therefore total control of the listener.

As a singer, it is possible to whisper at the audience, scream at the audience, reveal deep secrets or confront them with uncomfortable truths. Tell me about the sense of freedom that singing allows you to express yourself and how you perceive and build the relation with the audience.

I’d be terrified to scream and damage my voice, but I do like to play with dynamics to tell a story.

I’m definitely revealing deep secrets and singing about uncomfortable truths. I think that’s why my music resonates with people, especially the new album Weirdo, because I’m being so honest.

I’m singing lyrics that most people would only write in their diaries and not say out loud.

I'd love to know more about the vocal performances for Weirdo, please, and the qualities of your voice that you wanted to bring to the fore.  

My music draws upon lots of different genres, and my vocal performances are doing that, too. There’s more controlled, intricate, jazz like moments (eg “Let Me Sleep”), as well as more full, soulful moments (eg “Save Me”), and there’s a lot of grunge / rock in there too, so my voice has to have a bit more power and grit in those moments (“Weirdo” / “Stay”).

There’s also moments of being a bit more playful and being influenced by P-funk ("Black Hole").

For recording engineers, the human voice remains a tricky element to capture. What are some of the favourite recordings of your own voice so far and what makes voices sound great on record and in a live setting?

I’m really happy with the vocal recording across the whole of the Weirdo album. I wanted to capture my vocals as organically as possible, so I’m focussing on the performance, rather than thinking of how to tweak or hone things in post-production.

I used a large-diaphragm tube microphone for some drive and saturation, and not much else, just a bit of compression at the end of the chain.

For me, you should do as little to the vocals as possible; let your performance shine. That’s when vocals sound the best, in my opinion”.

I am going to move to The Line of Best Fit. Weirdo is an album that helped Emma-Jean Thackray find her way back from incredible grief. She is at her most open and moving on Weirdo. No wonder that it is award-nominated and won incredible praise from critics and fans! Someone who everyone needs to follow. I have been a fan for years and have seen her grow and evolve into this incredibly special talent whose music and words no doubt are helping so many others who live with and have experiences with grief and neurodivergence:

“Exerting total control over an album is something Thackray has done before – though, as she admits, she has always downplayed it in public. With Weirdo, however, a proudly solipsistic approach was the only one that made sense. “Because of the nature of what I’ve been writing about, I needed to put myself at the centre of everything, whereas before I’ve not really centred myself,” she says. “It’s just been about the music, and I just happened to be here, like some sort of vessel. But because this is such a personal record, in terms of content, I had to be like, ‘I’m in the middle of this. This is my inner world.’"

Doing so was a form of therapy for Thackray. “It was just about trying to follow my own needs for the first time in so, so long, only thinking about myself. And it was really important to do that,” she says. Without considerations such as which string players to hire or how to direct a percussionist, Thackray had the space to slowly rebuild her days. “I just had to think about myself, like, ‘Ok, I’m gonna wake up. What do I feel like doing? Do I feel like playing some guitar? Do I feel like going for a walk?’ It was just getting back in touch with myself and what I was feeling.

“I think it was all part of the process for me,” she adds, “just processing what happened and trying to heal.”

Bare-faced lyrics are certainly a hallmark of the album. “Wanna Die” does what it says on the tin – “I don’t wanna die / Except for all the times I do” – while on “Maybe Nowhere” there’s a perversely sober sense of reason: “Maybe I’ll join you / In the beyond / Why should I stay? / Just paying some guy’s mortgage anyway.”

It’s undoubtedly weighty stuff, but Thackray sees a dark comedy in the album’s contrasts. “Wanna Die”, for instance, sets those gloomy words against an unexpectedly peppy, jazz-punk backdrop. Same goes for the album cover, which, aside from the toaster, also stars a tiny rubber duck. “That’s the kind of sense of humour I have,” she says, “trying to bring both sides of life to something: the bleak and the silly."

There’s a sly absurdity in the tracklisting, too. The songs “Tofu” and “Fried Rice” sit next to each other; the former repeats the word “tofu” over a tangling beat, while the latter sees Thackray simply stating she’d rather eat rice than go outside. The next track, “Where’d You Go”, however, deals with the existential unknown of what happens when someone dies. It illuminates one of the weirdest parts of grief: how it forces us to grapple with the commonplace and the unfathomable as if they were equals.

“I just really wanted to show people every part of what was going on,” Thackray says. “It wasn’t just me questioning everything and being super cerebral.” And so, when for three months rice was the only thing she wanted to cook for herself, “every single day,” Thackray wrote a song about it. What might seem like a symptom of malaise actually “became a routine that was really nourishing.” “It was a way that I was taking care of myself, without fully understanding that,” she explains”.

There are two more interviews to get to before a review. However, I would also adviser you check out this Wonderland interview from the start of the year. It is such a busy time for Emma-Jean Thackray. With a busy diary and fascinating literary ahead, she is going to be bringing Weirdo to fans all around the world. I want to include these particular sections from a recent interview from The Guardian, as we get to learn some background to Weirdo. However, Emma-Jean Thackray does hate being put in a box or easily and lazily defined:

“The West Yorkshire-born bandleader, 35, is often boxed in as “London-based trumpet player Emma-Jean Thackray,” she says with gentle defiance. “That annoys the fuck out of me, it feels reductive.” In actuality, she’s inspired as much by Madlib as she is Miles Davis; she’s a producer and musical polymath who uses the “jazz language” as a basis for her eclectic multiverse of broken beat, P-funk, spiritual jazz, hip-hop and beyond. Her 2016 debut EP, Walrus, signalled her unique grasp of groove, its rhythms intricately constructed from layers of brass and percussion. By the time she released her debut album Yellow in 2021, she had refined her complex arrangements into a cosmic jazz-funk sound that was ambitious yet jocular – referencing, as Sun Ra did, spiritual transcendence along with astronomy and weed.

Growing up, “I was a complete outsider. When I was a child, I didn’t know that I was neurodiverse.” She’s not spoken about it much until recently, but Thackray is autistic and has ADHD. “I was constantly confused, thinking that everyone had been given a rulebook that I hadn’t been given,” she continues. “I’ve had the word ‘weirdo’ thrust upon me, as an insult. So I’ve tried to reclaim it now and to be proud; it makes my art different from anyone else’s.”

Thackray started writing second album Weirdo in 2022 as an exploration of her neurodivergence, and a way of “embracing difficult mental health” after tour burnout. But its themes took a devastating turn the following year when, she says, “my life fell apart”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Brownswood Recordings

In January 2023, Thackray’s partner of 12 years died suddenly of natural causes. She details the desperate lows she reached with piercing directness on songs like Save Me (“I’m not whole any more / Broken pieces on the floor”), and, more playfully, the George Clinton-channelling Black Hole, featuring the comedian-musician Reggie Watts (“I’m in a black hole of despair / Only the beat can pull me out”). The songs are like a grief diary, she says. “I felt so lost. I didn’t know who I was any more.”

Thackray had previously believed “that there was no life and death”. She’s been a student of the east Asian philosophy of Tao since her teens – her 2020 EP Um Yang 음 양 referenced the Taoist concept of duality and harmony and she has Tao symbols tattooed on her thumbs. “For me, energy is never destroyed, it’s only transferred through people; they live on and are always a part of you. And then you’re confronted with [loss], and the anger stops the philosophising. I thought: the universe is just this cruel, horrible thing. There’s no balance, only pain.”

After “six months of doing nothing except playing Zelda and staring at the wall,” she summoned the strength to sing again, knowing that making music would be the way to “get back to myself”, to find “renewed trust in the purpose that I always had”. Weirdo was about the shift “from really not wanting to be here, and then finding my way back to music,” she says. “I’m not saying I don’t have really bad days, or weeks, months, whatever. But throughout it all, there was the want to make music. That’s the only way I can feel emotionally regulated.”

She credits her neurodiversity for her multi-instrumentalism and voracious stylistic approach. On Weirdo, there’s scarcely any trumpet. “Having had this sort of a death and rebirth, I feel like a completely different person to before,” she says, “so picking up the trumpet feels slightly alien now.” Instead, she’s singing far more and going heavy on guitar, too. The distortion and grunge sonics echo a childhood obsession with Kurt Cobain, her “special interest for a while before Miles Davis”, as well as Radiohead”.

The final interview I am including is from NME. The Leeds artist discussed her neurodivergence and how celebrating that were the seeds of Weirdo. This is an album that has connected to so many people. Even if it is personal, the words and music definitely speak to people. One of the most powerful and important records of 2025. I hope that it does win loads of awards, as this is such a standout year for Emma-Jean Thackray. Go and follow her on social media:

“I’m dead stoked for everyone,” she said of the 12 artists honoured. “It’s so nice to be amongst so many fantastic records. There are a couple on there that I thought would be shortlisted, a couple that were surprises to me. A good mate from college on there as well [Joe Webb].”

‘Weirdo’, featuring cameo appearances by Reggie Watts and Kassa Overall, sees Thackray making sense of her life as an artist and young woman with ADHD and autism, while also grappling with grief.

“I’m just a little weirdo,” she admitted. “I’ve always been a weirdo, my entire life. The seed of the record was about accepting and celebrating my neurodiversity. Then of course, it became about something else and evolved, but he very first seed of it was about me being a little weirdo.”

Asked for advice for anyone who may be worried about entering or navigating the music industry with neurodiversity, Thackray replied: “Be yourself. Throw yourself into the music – that’s the most important thing – and the music will take care of you”.

I am going to end with a review for Weirdo. The Quietus stated how Weirdo has not only saved Emma-Jean Thackray’s life: it will save so many others too. That is why I was compelled to spotlight her once more. The Quietus started by saying how the “genre-busting iconoclast makes a fearless leap forward”:

“In interviews ahead of the release of this second full-length LP, Emma-Jean Thackray has spoken more than once of how making it saved her life. That anyone could craft work so head-spinningly euphoric, so joyous and life-affirming, as a deliberate response to the unmooring felt following the death of their partner and amid an ongoing war with their own mental health, is a kind of miracle. But that’s just the start of what’s marvellous about this magnificent record.

In many ways its sound and style – typified by a questing musical omnivorousness, so an absence of any specific approach rather than the adoption of any single one – is a logical progression from Yellow, Thackray’s first LP proper, released in 2021. But Weirdo still feels like a stylistic surprise. In part this is the result of her decision to go back to an earlier mode of working, playing everything herself and recording at home, which was how she made her first EP, Ley Lines. Because her own talents are broad-based and numerous, and because she knows, understands and loves far more musics than those that easily fall within the jazz bracket she’s usually seen as operating in, Weirdo emerges as both an expected next step for Thackray, and at the same time the career equivalent of a high-speed handbrake turn.

You can’t pigeonhole it easily. For starters, Thackray uses her signature instrument – the trumpet – only sparingly. This feels a very consequential decision, the clean, strident, soaring sound almost entirely held back until towards the end, adding a sense of emergence and survival when at last she allows us to share its sonic uplift. It isn’t just her playing every instrument in the 1960s-TV-show-pastiche video for ‘Wanna Die’ that puts you in mind of OutKast circa Speakerboxxx/The Love Below: few artists have managed to inhabit as many genres at once, not just on a single album but within individual songs. If you wanted to give Weirdo a category, you’d have to make a new one up. Let’s call it a disco and P-Funk-inflected pop singer-songwriter album, then: but because it’s been made by a virtuoso multi-instrumentalist who’s grown up in British jazz’s emergent egalitarian improvisational tradition and has been surrounded and supported by what will surely be seen in due course as some of the greatest and most free-thinking musicians of all time, the results are therefore both expected and surprising, and never less than wonderful.

An unwavering commitment to excellence in musicianship and a lightness of compositional touch combine on every piece here to always exhilarating effect. Even the most complicated arrangements take flight with apparent effortlessness, in large part because they are fused with lyric-writing that prizes directness of communication over self-conscious poetics. Again and again Thackray hits hard and heavy through her startling and disarming economy of style. “I’m not whole any more, broken pieces on the floor,” she sings in the chorus of ‘Save Me’, a made-for-the-dancefloor belter which starts out like Afrobeat and ends up in Philly soul territory; the chorus of the helter-skelter, falling-over-itself ‘Wanna Die’ stacks words of only one or two syllables until they teeter into near collapse in an enjambed ending that disrupts what Stewart Lee would identify as the rhythm of the joke (“I am doing fine / I’m not gonna cry / I don’t wanna die / Except for all the times / I do”), simultaneously making it even funnier and even more of a punch to the guts.

Simply reading the track listing is enough to tell this perfectly executed concept album’s consistent, involving and ultimately empowering story. Some of the songs were written before her partner’s death and before Weirdo’s narrative existed: but it’s impossible to tell which ones without having them pointed out, testament to the thoroughness of the work completed here, and vindication of Thackray’s decision at the outset to tell Gilles Peterson and the rest of the Brownswood staff that they would have to leave her alone to get on with it and content themselves with hearing it when she’d finished the whole thing.

The individual songs are widescreen epics in their own right – even the ones where, if you judged them by their durations, you’d expect them to be interludes or skits. The record’s slightest moment – ‘Tofu’, two minutes and thirteen seconds of cyclical keyboards and snare rattle framing a descending vocal containing only the beancurd of the title and the occasional “oh” – works perfectly in its context, ahead of the even shorter ‘Fried Rice’ (“I wanna make fried rice / I don’t wanna go outside … Maybe then I’ll be alright”), comfort eating as shorthand for, and potential way out of, the depths of solitary depression. ‘What Is The Point’ lists things that you have to do but which don’t seem worth the effort when the person you normally do them with has gone, and stops abruptly in the middle of a purposefully directionless Minimoog solo, still short of two minutes.

Throughout, the writing and the execution are peerless, and not without considerable risk. ‘Where’d You Go’ – a full-length song, comprised of a series of questions not so much rhetorical as obvious, drives right up to the edge of banality until, just before halfway through, one final devastating query turns the thing on its head; the second half consists of a multi-tracked mantra (“I’m chasing shadows / Don’t know where you’ve gone”) underpinned by a superbly understated trumpet solo, deliberately buried a couple of floors down from the top of the skyscraper of a mix. ‘Maybe Nowhere’ – the result of Thackray “wondering what it sounds like to die” – starts out a loping beast built from moderately overdriven bass grumble, glittering guitar and room-shaking drums, and ends in a cascading overlap of instrumental layers that retain precision and clarity even as volume and intensity build to a final shuddering disintegration. ‘Remedy’ achieves its penultimate-track intention of signposting a way out of grief’s clutches by first adopting then subverting the cliches of self-help, standing transcendent on solid bass guitar bedrock as it shimmers into a sunlit coda that sets the spirit into a lark-like ascent.

She deals throughout in uplift and empowerment, both lyrics and music shining blazing floodlights into the darkest corners of her most despairing moments, showing us the routes she used to climb her way out and allowing us to follow her when we want or need to. It will not only be Thackray’s life that this superb LP will save”.

This is an artist I really admire and know is going to be making music for decades more. Go and check out her Grounding episodes and pick up a copy of Weirdo if you can. Such a stunning album and remarkable artist that we should all salute, embrace and celebrate. If she is not there already, then make sure that you…

GET her into your life.

___________

Follow Emma Jean Thackray

PHOTO CREDIT: Brownswood Recordings

Official:

https://www.emmajeanthackray.com/

TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@ejthackray

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/ejthackray/

Spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/artist/3UgcksTtuB1Jnn8BrisEiC

YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/@EJThackray

FEATURE: Spotlight: Night Tapes

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

PHOTO CREDIT: Jamie-Lee Culver

Night Tapes

__________

I will include a couple of…

2024 interviews with Night Tapes before getting to some newer chats. First, I want to feature The Honey Pop and their interview from last June. I am quite new to Night Tapes, so it is helpful looking back at previous interviews and seeing where they have come from. You can tell the London-based trio of Max Doohan, Sam Richards and Iiris Vesik. If you have not yet discovered the trio then I would thoroughly recommend them:

“Your previous EP, Perfect Kindness, is something we can never get enough of. We’re obsessed with the ethereal energy in both the instrumentals and vocals. Each track is its own perfect vibe/journey. Can you tell us a bit about the creation process of the Perfect Kindness EP?

Ah, that’s nice. It took quite a long time and meticulous crafting of the whole EP. We had time to make 20 versions of everything. For example, there were like 20 versions of ‘Inigo’ before its final form.

Perfect Kindness came together more as a collage. Some of these songs like ‘Selene’ and ‘Humans’ were made after Richie heard them in his dreams. Silent Song was a process from 2016-2022 – it started as a piano song and then re-emerged when Max found a loop that we all had jammed on with drums, synths, and flute. The topline just fit and suddenly everything made sense.

We used to all live together in a house back then and flitter between each other’s rooms when anyone had a cool idea going. We used to have lots of random jams together and recorded them onto tape in our bedroom studios. We still have hundreds of little demos from that time and occasionally we’ll go through them for textures and vibes.

Speaking of creating an EP, how would you compare the process of creating Perfect Kindness to the creation of your new EP, assisted memories?

Both were created in our living quarters. Perfect Kindness was made in bedrooms while assisted memories were made mostly in living rooms and corridors.

Perfect Kindness took a long time to create and assisted memories came together quite fast. We really had years to reopen the projects on Perfect Kindness whilst with assisted memories we had a deadline for the first time.

For me the 2 EP’s have quite a yin & yang energy going on. Perfect Kindness is definitely yin: nighttime listening, wandering and experimenting.  assisted memories is quite yang: it’s more directional and punchy, the songs feel to me like crystallized snowflakes.

In terms of making assisted memories, everything that we had learned whilst making perfect kindness we could refine and put into (fast) practice with assisted memories. I’m also really proud to see how the songs that Max and Richie mixed turned out. We are so happy that for both of these EPs for specific songs we got to work with the mix wizard Nathan Boddy, he really elevated the tracks he worked on.

The EPs are going to be on double vinyl together when the new assisted memories comes out.

The genre of “dream pop” is so fitting for your sound, in our opinion! What are some of the influences/genres/artists that helped bring you to the sound you have today?

Ah! That’s nice to hear, yeah we love dreamy ethereal stuff but our backgrounds are actually more electronic. We hadn’t really listened to Cocteau Twins before people started to reference them in comparison to us. We do love Tame Impala and Deerhunter, but I wouldn’t say that we listen to dream pop usually.

I have always been a Björk, Bowie, Kate Bush Holy Trinity fangirl & at the moment I’m actually listening to a lot of dance music, future breakbeat & I’ve been discovering UK jungle & garage gems. I was the one to bring the boys over to the dark side and now they also love pop music. But they’re probably not as into Charlie Puth as I am. I always try to keep an open mind about new music, I’m always on the prowl for some.

Richie probably is the most indie of us all, loves Bon Iver and Big Thief. But when I met him then he was making more electronic dance music and house music.  He is big into his chord sequences and he has a jazz guitar degree.

Max has always been an ambient music lover – Brian Eno, Hiroshi Yoshimura, Lone, and such. When I met him, he was making ambient-infused electronic dance music.  He is big into drones. He also plays drums in a post-rock/electronic indie band and he is sessioning top-level R&B bass at the moment”.

I am going to move on to UNCLEAR and their interview with Night Tapes. Speaking with the three-piece around assisted memories and its success, it was a big step for them. This year has seen incredible singles such as helix and storm. This is a group with a massive future ahead. Although I have not known about them for too long, I can see there is a lot of excitement around them:

“What is your writing/production process typically like? Did you try any new methods or styles within this process recently?

Night Tapes: “Our writing process is pretty erratic. We all make tracks individually and we can write together. The annoying, correct answer to this question is ‘every time is different’ ([laughs] I used to absolutely loathe these kinds of answers, but it’s so true). I think it’s good to keep on exploring, there is a saying that applies to art quite well: ‘if you think you know what you’re doing, you’ve killed it.’  Throughout the years we have learned to just make songs happen faster, but switching up approaches like writing with a new instrument or writing to visuals seems to work for us.”

If you each had to choose a favorite track from this EP, which would it be and why?

Night Tapes: “At the moment my fave is ‘easy time to be alive.’ It’s built on this one spontaneous dictaphone recording we did one morning with Max. We found the recording randomly at a session and built everything around it as we couldn’t change anything about it. It turned out everything was there, we just needed to trust the first recording and the first feeling it had.”

This fall, you’ll be on your debut US tour including shows in NYC and LA! Which part of this tour are you most excited for?

Night Tapes: “We are so excited to see all the new cities we’ve never been to before (Chicago and San Francisco). We are also very excited to see the people who have been championing us online.”

What do you want to tell your future, end-of-this-year self? What do you hope you’ve accomplished individually and as a group by December 31st?

Night Tapes: “I would like to tell my future end-of-this-year self that creativity needs order and chaos and I hope she will go to a sunny place this winter to rest, regroup and adventure. I would like to accomplish inner freedom, thank you”.

I am going to move to this year. On 26th September, Night Tapes release their debut album, portals//polarities. After a series of E.P.s and singles, this is the first definitive and full work from Night Tapes. I am writing this on 15th September, so I am not sure what the reviews are like for the album. We will soon find out. The Line of Best Fit spoke with the trio in August. It is a fascinating interview. Starly Lou Riggs spent time with a trio who are creating their own sound and niche. The Line of Best Fit say that “Instead of heading to bed after performing, Night Tapes wrote an entirely new album on their last tour. Born in hotel rooms on the road, it finds Iiris Vesik, Max Doohan, and Sam “Richie” Richards cracking the code on how to capture a moment in time with sound”:

“Night Tapes are all about vibes. More specifically, they’re about organic feeling and expression. Each of these tracks tells the story of a time and place, serving as a diverse array of sounds and mapping the band’s sonic dreamscape – from sun-laced dance hits about a screen-obsessed world (“television”) to more seedy city grit (“leave it all behind, Mike”), the album feels like riding a virtual wave of both soft and heavy currents.

Sitting atop Doohan and Richards’ hypnotic instrumentals, Vesik’s whispered vocals act as a teleportation device. Amid twisting tones that feel weightless, tracks like “tokyo sway” and “masterplan” feel like a journey to another dimension – one entwined in VHS-tape ribbon and a blue crackling screen. The heavy-hitting punchy beats of delicate trip-hop track “babygirl (like n01 else)” juxtapose with Vesik’s syrupy vocals. From “enter” to “wayfarer”, Night Tapes invite nostalgia without going backwards in time. Instead, they’re bridging the gap, bringing together both inner and outer worlds.

In general, electronic music has an air of being “perfected.” When polished and tuned, live instrumental tracking sometimes disappears. Night Tapes, however, bend these expectations by tracking with both messy and masterly methods. “When we capture the recordings – the raw recordings – that’s not precise,” Doohan clarifies. “But then we [go] through everything with a fine-toothed comb and apply that electronic production mindset to these imperfect things.” The resulting sound is something a bit in between, capturing the human behind the computerboard.

PHOTO CREDIT: Marii Kiisk

To simply call the band “electronic” does them a disservice. Their work feels more like a lucid dream, breathing new life into the familiar sounds of shoegaze, synth-pop, and trip-hop, gripping a ‘90s backdrop while looking into the future. On top of it all, they write everything improvisationally. Whether at home or abroad, the process is so wonderfully collaborative that they sometimes forget who wrote which line. Doohan laughs, “There are some bass lines that I’ll play the first half of and then Richie will play the second half, maybe slightly overlaying each other, so they’re actually kind of impossible to play!” Later, they have to relearn each track to play live as a band, pulling from recordings and fitting them together again like puzzle pieces.

They’ve been so successfully locked in with conceptual EPs, it’s landed them tours across the globe and over 18 million streams. While a lot of their inspiration still stems from London, the group got a fresh wave of inspiration out on the road post-pandemic lockdown. In the end, Vesik explains, “We tried writing at home for quite a long time before, and it all just came together on tour.”

Lit by a new match, Vesik, Doohan, and Richards were able to find new inspiration in the very places they dreamt of visiting. After kicking off the dust of pandemic restlessness, Richards notices that “the songs were a way of escaping the mundanity of being in London and being inside. We were lucky we could be together to write that, but a lot of the time, it’s as if we’re somewhere else.” They had hoped to visit Mexico, even writing “pacifico” about the city of San José del Pacifico before ever setting foot in the country. The track serves instead as a daydream, depicting a place their friend had visited and told them about”.

I am going to end in a minute. The final interview is from NME. Transporting and deep Pop, Night Tapes put their feelings very much first when it comes to their music. NME observed how the trio infuse and pack their songs with “vitality, emotion and the spirit of their travels”. The brilliant and anticipated portals//polarities is one of the most essential, important debut albums of this year. I recently published a mixtape with songs from incredible debut albums. That was before portals//polarities came out. I think that this album will get an honourable mention:

“While ‘Portals // Polarities’ continues their knack for gliding melodies and synths that practically glow, it also pivots towards trip hop, breakbeat and acid house – in part, thanks to Doohan’s more recent interest in dance music. “Because we’re always trying to react to each other, somebody might bring something which is really far outside that direction,” Richards explains when NME meets the band in more familiar territory – dialling in from their south London house-share, not long after wrapping up their Cover photoshoot. “Then, we always try to understand what makes it sound like Night Tapes and catch it.”

But for a band whose work remains so intimate and spectral, ‘Portals // Polarities’ is “probably the most extroverted work we’ve done”. “The beginning of Night Tapes was more introverted and slower, but our lives were also slower,” Vesik admits. “Everything’s going so fast now. It’s like, whirr! It’s interesting to capture the snapshots.”

London seemed like an endless font of inspiration when Night Tapes began. It was a change of pace from the band’s backgrounds: Doohan and Richards hail from rural towns around the New Forest, while Vesik is from Tallinn, Estonia, and moved to London a decade ago to pursue music. “I guess I was always quite expressive – the usual!” she cackles, bold red lipstick marks streaked across her cheeks from the photoshoot. “We have a certain stereotype of Estonians,” she adds, referencing the country’s aloof image, “which I believe is not true. We have a very rich inner life – we might not always share it…”

PHOTO CREDIT: Jamie Waters for NME

Doohan and Vesik met at university and started living together, with Richards joining them later in 2016. Initially, all three pursued their own musical projects, but soon began jamming together at night. When they eventually recorded their 2019 debut EP ‘Dream Forever In Glorious Stereo’, they did so at hushed volumes, so as not to disturb their neighbours. “There’s a lot of collective consciousness – there’s so many dreams and thoughts in London,” Doohan says. “It’s a very powerful, buzzing energy. It’s very inspiring because of that – if you can tap into it and not go crazy…”

Though Night Tapes’ sound is mired in escapism and fantasy, there’s an unusually strong duty to truth on multiple levels. Across the album, you’ll hear a multitude of samples recorded during their tours from November 2024 to January 2025. Most of their vocals were recorded in situ straight into an iPhone, and the band would later craft songs around specific samples, exploring juxtaposing textures and soundscapes to build their worlds.

‘Enter’, for instance, evokes an eerie, surreal limbo, pairing a dampened digital drum kit with strummed acoustic guitars recorded in an Estonian swamp. Meanwhile, those LA helicopters turn ‘Leave It All Behind, Mike’ into a dystopian high-stakes escapade, despite its dreamy ’80s instrumentals: “If the world is ending / Would you share with me our last strawberry?”

“You can have a very simple song, but if you put the sound of a cityscape over the top of it, it completely recontextualises it,” Doohan explains. “You can frame the song differently depending on what kind of foley you use behind it”.

This is a very important time for Night Tapes. With a debut album about to come out (though it will be out by the time this feature is shared), there are some great dates coming up. The trio head to North America for a string of dates. They have so many fans around the world. That will only build and expand as portals//polarities comes out and gets all this love. For those who are unaware of Night Tapes, make sure you add them to your collection. A trio who make music…

THAT is truly unforgettable.

____________

Follow Night Tapes

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/nighttapesmusic/

TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@wearenighttapes

YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCioo1pJKTjeou1VBEXc_bPQ

Spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/artist/5APEQlUaQ5K70LgPqAdTuU?si=2RayNHfTT82i_2CxqYVl3Q

Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/nighttapesband/

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Songs from Incredible Debut Albums of 2025

FEATURE:

The Digital Mixtape

IN THIS PHOTO: Heartworms/PHOTO CREDIT: Jamie Waters for NME

Songs from Incredible Debut Albums of 2025

__________

I may do another…

IN THIS PHOTO: JADE/PHOTO CREDIT: Thom Kerr for Wonderland

feature where I name the best ten debut albums of this year. Before then, I have compiled a mixtape featuring songs from incredible debut albums of 2025. I will have forgotten some but, what is my hope, most have been included. The debut album is such a hard thing to pull off. There is a sense of expectation and pressure. This is often the first statement from an artist. I don’t think that many artists hit their peaks on their debut albums. However, there is something special about that first album. This year has seen some extraordinary and eclectic debut albums. I have compiled some tracks from simply amazing introductory albums. These are examples where artists have very much hit…

IN THIS PHOTO: Maruja

THE ground running.

FEATURE: A Passion and Not a Distraction: The Stage Careers of Beloved Artists

FEATURE:

A Passion and Not a Distraction

IN THIS PHOTO: Lucy Rebecca Taylor (Self Esteem) will appear in David Hare’s Teeth ’n’ Smiles in London next year/ PHOTO CREDIT: Jono White

The Stage Careers of Beloved Artists

__________

THERE is this interesting crossover…

PHOTO CREDIT: Brian Lazo/Pexels

and interaction in film and music where we see artists gracing the big screen and turning in wonderful performances. Actors who portray musicians in biopics. There is a whole list of artists who you know would have made incredible actors but never got the chance or decided not to embark on that career. Gwen Stefani leaps to mind. Today, heavyweight artists such as Dua Lipa and Lady Gaga appear in films. Lady Gaga has been for years. Charli xcx is starting out her acting career. Taylor Swift has been in films. Little Simz is a phenomenal actor. There does seem to be this natural relationship between film and music. Most musicians make music videos and there is something about an actor performance from a live gig. A lot of the discipline and personality traits needed to perform an epic gig ties into acting. We will see a lot of great artists go into film and T.V. I am not sure whether the reverse is true and actors can make natural musicians. History says it is s mixed bag! However, if film and music seem to interact, do we talk about musicians appearing on the stage? Some might say that this is a very similar transfer. However, theatre, musical or straight, and film are very different. Film and T.V. relies on multiple takes. Theatre is this single performance where you have to nail it. Musical theatre is so demanding. I don’t think it is as easy to go from music to theatre. Even though a lot of artists have that stamina and stagecraft to deliver a great acting performance, there are dynamics and aspects of an acting performance that are not imbued in music and live performances. Different skills that you have to pick up. It can be hard to detach from the musical arena and step into this different world.

PHOTO CREDIT: Rosaline Shahnavaz/The Guardian

I mention it as there is news that Rebecca Lucy Taylor (a.k.a. Self Esteem) will appear in a new revival that will hit the West End from next March. The Guardian shared a feature about this development. Someone I can see appearing in quite a few films, it seems that Rebecca Lucy Taylor has a natural and burgeoning career in theatre. As she recently staged a theatrical presentation of her latest album, A Complicated Woman, it seems that Taylor is naturally drawn to the stage:

“Self Esteem to star as raging rock star in revival of David Hare’s Teeth ’n’ Smiles

Rebecca Lucy Taylor will play Maggie, a role originated by Helen Mirren, in a ‘landmark’ 50th anniversary production in London in March

Fifty years after Helen Mirren originated the role, Rebecca Lucy Taylor AKA Self Esteem is to play a raging rock star in a West End revival of Teeth ’n’ Smiles by David Hare.

It will take Taylor back to the Duke of York’s theatre, where she performed a four-night “theatrical presentation” of her third album, A Complicated Woman, in April. In Hare’s 1975 play she takes the lead role of a singer, Maggie, in an imploding band who put on a concert for a Cambridge University May ball at the end of the 1960s. The mood is summed up by the band’s closing number, Last Orders on the Titanic. Taylor will contribute additional music and lyrics to original song by the brothers Nick and Tony Bicât respectively.

Daniel Raggett will direct the production, which opens in March and runs for 12 weeks. Tickets will go on sale in October. “I’m deeply honoured to be bringing Teeth ’n’ Smiles back for its 50th anniversary,” said Taylor. “I love to challenge myself in new forms and I can’t wait to slap you round the face with Maggie. I am a huge fan of Daniel and David’s work, and the chance to collaborate with them on such a landmark production is something I am insanely excited about.”

Taylor spent a decade in the indie duo Slow Club and released her solo debut album as Self Esteem, Compliments Please, in 2019. It was followed by Prioritise Pleasure, named the best album of 2021 by Guardian music critics. Taylor made her theatrical debut as Sally Bowles in Cabaret at the Playhouse in London in 2023. Next month marks the publication of her first book, A Complicated Woman, billed as “a cathartic scream … that gets to the heart of being a woman in the world today”.

I can’t think of anything more exciting than watching Rebecca Lucy Taylor and Daniel Raggett strip the varnish off my old play,” Hare said. “It’s a perfect moment to see if a new generation responds to that 70s mix of hope, drugs, music, sex and despair.”

Teeth ’n’ Smiles was first staged at the Royal Court in 1975, with a cast including Antony Sher, and transferred to the West End the following year. The role of Maggie was compared to Janis Joplin, and the Guardian’s Michael Billington wrote that Hare “captures precisely that moment in a culture when a dream explodes. Like John Osborne in The Entertainer, he realises there is poetry and pathos in the spectacle of decline”.

It is not strange for artists to step onto the stage. Will Young, Beverley Knight, Emma Bunton and Melanie C are among those who have appeared in theatrical productions. I think most are musical theatre productions. The rebel play, Teeth 'n' Smiles, has musical moments, though it is not a technically a musical. It is rare for artists to step outside of musical theatre when we think of stage performances. One of the most notable transitions of the past few years is when Cheryl appeared in 2:22: A Ghost Story in 2023. Playing a new mother, Jenny, in Danny Robins’s supernatural story, this was a role previously played by Lily Allen. I am not sure if there are doubts and cynicism when artists step onto the stage. There are theatre snobs and critics who feel it is maybe stunt casting or someone stepping outside of their arena. Although Cheryl’s performance was acclaimed, I guess a lot of it falls on the quality of the production and the other actors. One downside might be too much focus and pressure being on this high-profile musician appearing on the stage. Maybe that takes away from the ensemble and the play’s direction and writing. However, I do think that it is hugely impressive when artists go into theatre. Maybe a lot more daunting and harder to do a performance that is not musical and is dark or quite heavy-hitting, I wonder how many others from music will transfer to the stage. Rebecca Lucy Taylor is someone who has this relationship with the stage. She also composed the score for the Jodie Comer-starring Prima Facie. The Suzie Miller play won Comer an Olivier, and there is a national tour of the production next year.

Perhaps it is more common in the U.S., but a host of American artist have appeared in acclaimed productions there. From Brandy Norwood to Sting to Josh Groban to Michelle Williams, again, a lot of these performance are musical theatre. I guess Teeth ‘n’ Smiles is close to musical theatre. About a failing Rock band, fronted by the Janis Joplin-like Maggie Frisby, performing at Jesus College's May Ball in 1969, things descends into chaos as the clash between the band and the academics highlights the end of the optimistic 1960s counter-culture. Rather than it being musical theatre, I see it closer in town to a new production like Stereophonic: The play follows a fictional rock band (very much based around Fleetwood Mac and their Rumours period) on the cusp of superstardom as they struggle through recording their new album set from 1976 to 1977. It is just a subject I am curious about. Also, what skills and attributes can Rebecca Lucy Taylor take from these theatrical experiences into her music? Does she have this extra edge and level because of what she has picked up from these productions? Perhaps so? Also, did she take a lot of her natural and years-long talents and instincts and ably and phenomenally triumph on the stage? Again, I think so. I think that Rebecca Lucy Taylor will be simply electric when she appears in Teeth ‘n’ Smiles. It will be an accomplished and extraordinary performance from…

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by SELF ESTEEM (@selfesteemselfesteem)

A tremendous talent.

FEATURE: The Reggae Kite: The Artists and Influences in Kate Bush’s Music

FEATURE:

 

 

The Reggae Kite

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1978/PHOTO CREDIT: Gered Mankowitz

The Artists and Influences in Kate Bush’s Music

__________

A slightly short feature…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush circa 1980

I have been thinking about characters in Kate Bush’s work. This is research ahead of a possible book. To see if there is enough to write about. There are plenty of people mentioned in her songs. Named or anonymous, Bush is very much influenced by people. That is what drives and fascinates her. It is not only the characters she includes in her songs. There are artists who she loves or listened to that goes into the songs. That might have shifted later in life. I think up to and including Aerial in 2005, there were touches of other artists. Definitely up to The Red Shoes in 1993. Even though Bush brought in other musicians to albums after The Red Shoes in 1993 or Aerial in 2005, could you listen to songs from those albums, and 2011’s Director’s Cut and 50 Words for Snow, and say they are influenced by other artists? Maybe this is Kate Bush paying tribute to another artist? It is debatable. Definitely, earlier in her career, Bush was driven by other artists. Kate Bush got compared to artists like Laura Nyro and Joni Mitchell. Even though she was compared to those artists, I don’t think that she really was channelling them. You can listen to The Kick Inside and Lionheart and hear shades of those artists. It is only natural for artists, over their early career, to include nods to other artists. Either those who they love or feel add something to the mix. In the case of Kate Bush, as I have explored in previous features, she grew up around a lot of different music. From Roy Harper and English Folk to Irish music, Roxy Music, Elton John, Captain Beefheart and Pink Floyd, you can hear some of this in Kate Bush’s music. I have talked about some songs on The Kick Inside and Never for Ever, where Pink Floyd’s influence can be heard. The Saxophone Song on The Kick Inside and Breathing on Never for Ever. Not a pastiche or heavily leaning on them, you can tell that this band were in her mind when she was writing these tracks. The spritely piano riff on James and the Cold Gun from The Kick Inside, I feel, was Bush’s nod to Steely Dan. That entire track has a Dan quality to it. The band also inspired other moments in Kate Bush’s cannon. A slight hint of Steely Dan on Never for Ever’s Blow Away (for Bill). If not in the lyrics then parts of the compositions, as MOJO suggested.

It is interesting looking at various tracks and noticing spots of other artists. If not in the sound then maybe the title. I have just been writing about The Red Shoes and the lead track, Rubberband Girl, obviously takes its title from The Spinners’ 1976 hit, The Rubberband Man. There are cases where Kate Bush has written songs inspired by distinct artists that people have not picked up on. I want to bring in this article, where Kate Bush discusses Wow (from 1978’s Lionheart) and the inspiration behind the song. Even though she says it was her first go at writing a Pink Floyd song, listen to the end of The Saxophone Song and you can tell this was influenced by Pink Floyd. That cosmic outro definitely channels them! Even so, as she explains, other tracks with distinct artists at their core passed a lot of people by:

‘Wow’ is a song about the music business, not just rock music but show business in general, including acting and theatre. People say that the music business is about ripoffs, the rat race, competition, strain, people trying to cut you down, and so on, and though that’s all there, there’s also the magic. It was sparked off when I sat down to try and write a Pink Floyd song, something spacey; Though I’m not surprised no-one has picked that up, it’s not really recognisable as that, in the same way as people haven’t noticed that ‘Kite’ is a Bob Marley song, and ‘Don’t Push Your Foot On The Heartbrake’ is a Patti Smith song. When I wrote it I didn’t envisage performing it – the performance when it happened was an interpretation of the words I’d already written. I first made up the visuals in a hotel room in New Zealand, when I had half an hour to make up a routine and prepare for a TV show. I sat down and listened to the song through once, and the whirling seemed to fit the music. Those who were at the last concert of the tour at Hammersmith must have noticed a frogman appear through the dry ice it was one of the crew’s many last night ‘pranks’ and was really amazing. I’d have liked to have had it in every show.

Kate Bush Club newsletter, Summer 1979”.

I did know about Don’t Push Your Foot on the Heartbrake and Kite. The former is from Lionheart. I didn’t peg Kate Bush for a Patti Smith fan! However, you listen to the song and you can hear her influence come through. I love to imagine Kate Bush listening to Bob Marley! As a teenager in her bedroom spinning a record by Bob Marley & The Wailers! Bush experiment with Reggae at other times in her career. Kite is from The Kick Inside. Another track on that album, Them Heavy People, has a touch of Reggae to it. Maybe not Bob Marley per se, but one of his contemporaries. Beyond obvious musicians that she loved and guided her, such as David Bowie and Elton John, there are more obscure or less obvious ones that she was touched by. I listen to Them Heavy People and actually hear a bit of Ska or Two Tone. Maybe The Specials or Madness woven in. Bush is a singular and original artist, though within this comes some distinct guidance from other artists. Critics who did not pick up on the references to Patti Smith and Bob Marley in 1978 also missed the Pink Floyd inspiration on Wow. Did this continue later in her career? Delve into The Dreaming and that world. Kate Bush has said how a lot of the percussion sound on that album was motivated by Peter Gabriel and the work he was doing at Townhouse Studios. There are bits of Lodger-era David Bowie in Sat in Your Lap. A Bowie-esque track, I feel! Get Out of My House, the final track on The Dreaming, could be a mix of various influences. There is something Punk about it. Raw and visceral, one feels that Bush was channelling a combination of Punk artists like Sex Pistols with a bit of her own version of that genre. Definitely, one can hear Captain Beefheart and the more avant-garde side of her record collection through other tracks on that album. Perhaps more delicate and less obvious than earlier references, other sounds and artists played a role throughout.

Kate Bush said how the first single from The Dreaming, Sat in Your Lap, was inspired by Stevie Wonder during a concert she saw in London. A case of another artist having an impact on a song. We rightly commend and salute Kate Bush as this innovator and artists who has influenced so many others. Even if Kate Bush said in her later career that she does not listen to other people’s music when writing albums, I guess you can listen back to some of her albums and detect the importance of other artists. Whether consciously trying to write a song in their style or a subconscious I have been thinking about the split between, say The Kick Inside up to The Dreaming and Hounds of Love to the present day. Whether musical influences were more on the fringes for those later albums and more at the core for the earlier ones? Is that natural for every artist. Legends and newcomers alike operate this way I think. However, if we dig into her work in the 2000s and 2010s, I am sure there will be a song here and there where we can see the colours of another artist. It got me thinking when looking at that article for Wow and how this was Kate Bush channelling Pink Floyd. How Bob Marley and Patti Smith were referenced in other songs. I have suggested a bit of Steely Dan in one song. Billie Holiday is an artist Bush admired and I can even feel her touch in some of the vocal performance on Aerial and 50 Words for Snow.

Folk-influenced songs earlier in her career have a suggestion of Simon & Garfunkel. Kate Bush was a huge fan of The Beatles and actually said how much she admired their underrated 1967 E.P./soundtrack, Magical Mystery Tour. You can hear the kaleidoscopic and psychedelic tones of that work in some of her tracks. Lionheart’s Coffee Homeground comes to mind. In a recent feature from Far Out Magazine, it is clear that The Beatles influenced Kate Bush on every level: “It’s one thing to have a bit of musical influence from The Beatles, but Hounds of Love is the most obvious example of Bush using the Fab mentality. Much like Abbey Road’s second side is constructed like a medley of different tunes, The Ninth Wave, on the flipside of Bush’s magnum opus, takes that mentality one step further by crafting a storyline of a woman lost at sea after her boat crashes”. Maybe people will have their own theories and suggestions. This does sound like I am trying to reduce Kate Bush’s work to the point of parody or copycatting. Quite the opposite! Every single artist has influence and nothing is completely free of other artists’ work. Those Kate Bush admired borrowed from others and were influenced by them. Kate Bush motivated to write songs because of other artists. It is wonderful to hear. I have probably missed some examples so, if you notice any, please let me know. Shades and tones of other wonderful artists flying and flowing in…

THAT diamond kite.

FEATURE: I’m Gonna Dance the Dream: Kate Bush’s The Red Shoes at Thirty-Two

FEATURE:

 

 

I’m Gonna Dance the Dream

Kate Bush’s The Red Shoes at Thirty-Two

__________

THIS is the sole feature I will write…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1993

about the upcoming thirty-second anniversary of Kate Bush’s seventh studio album, The Red Shoes. Fans will be aware of the background. Released on 1st November, 1993, The Red Shoes followed 1989’s The Sensual World. Think about her trajectory and changes from 1985’s Hounds of Love to 1993’s The Red Shoes. Hounds of Love being this incredibly ambitious and phenomenal album that was both of the 1980s but ahead of its time. The Sensual World was not to repeat that. Coming at the end of the decade, instead, this was Kate Bush composing music that was more feminine. Hounds of Love had a lot of primal and masculine energy. So too did 1982’s The Dreaming. The Sensual World is more autumnal and sensuous. Not as percussive or epic as Hounds of Love. Perhaps more personal and coming from the perspective of a woman entering her thirties – Bush turned thirty in 1988, the year before The Sensual World was released -, her only album of the 1990s perhaps struggled to find its feet (no pun intended!). The production could not quite be how it was on previous albums. Trying to fit into the times and also be distinctly Kate Bush, there were questions about its sound and quality. Whether Bush’s heart and head were committed. Even though she experienced loss and separation just before the album came out and around the time, when writing most of the songs, these events had not happened. Even so, taking on a lot at a time when she could feel strains and tragedy looming or at least showing their first signs, The Red Shoes is not viewed as one of Kate Bush’s best albums. Regardless, I still think it is a lot better than people give it credit for. There is a lot to love about it. This was the first album where Kate Bush did not appear – she has not since appeared on an album cover –, and we only see a pair of feet. Granted, they are Bush’s feet. In a photograph taken by her brother, John Carder Bush, that slight sense of mystery or disappearing out of frame was a sign of what was to come.

After The Red Shoes was released in 1993, Bush started to retreat from the public eye. I often feel, as The Red Shoes is inspired by the film of the 1948 same name, that the album cover was like a film poster. Honing in on the focal point of the title. Also, having been exposed and very much on a promotional treadmill since 1978, Bush did not necessarily want to be at the centre of things. The cover is great. The sequencing is a letdown and means that we have an album that is top and middle-heavy. In terms of the tracks, a few of her very best numbers are on The Red Shoes. Including the title track, Lily, Moments of Pleasure and Eat the Music, there are very few weak cuts. Also, despite the fact The Red Shoes does not sound like anything else released in 1993 and it does not try to fit in, I think that works in its favour. Kate Bush did strip down and rework some of the songs from The Red Shoes for 2011’s Director’s Cut. I would like to see The Red Shoes’ songs in their original state, though with a different sound. Maybe stripped down and remixed, just so that these incredible songs are not as compressed, tinny…and a product of 1990s production. That would be interesting. There are precious few features or retrospectives concerning The Red Shoes! Given the somewhat muted and lacklustre reaction in 1993 from critics, maybe that is not a shock. The Red Shoes did reach number two in the U.K. and an impressive twenty-eight in the U.S. In April 2024, Eat the Music was re-released on a 10" vinyl record for Record Store Day, featuring B-sides Lily and Big Stripey Lie from the original album. The Red Shoes has perhaps the broadest and most eclectic collection of featured guests. From Lenny Henry, Prince, the Trio Bulgarka, Lily Cornford, Eric Clapton, Jeff Beck and Nigel Kennedy, it is clear that it is a lot more crowded than most of her albums. Perhaps a few too many featured artists and contributors. Does Kate Bush’s voice and singularity shine through enough?!

I want to go to a couple of promotional interviews from 1993. In a decade of lad and ladette culture, and with Britpop starting to show shoots in that year, how did they react to an artist like Kate Bush? A mainstay who started making music in the 1970s, I still don’t think she was afforded the sort of respect that she had earned at this point. Rock Compact Disc spoke with Kate Bush in 1993:

“Del's enthusiasm for his musical partner's work is infectious. In contrast, Bush herself is reserved when it comes to anything except her music. Ask her about the technicalities of recording using her Fairlight computer system and she'll tell you exactly about how her songs come about. When it comes to explaining the stories behind the songs, however, or talking about Kate Bush, the person, she is uniquely retiring. But when it comes to her music, Bush has spent many years developing a skill for getting what she wants - a skill that she's developed into a fine art. She speaks gently and slowly, picking her words carefully, looking almost frail and innocent as her expressive wide eyes stare in wonderment. But her delicate looks and tiny frame belie her drive and power - not many artists of any stature get to be so creatively in control as Kate Bush. For her, though, it is and always has been the number one priority. 'I think creative control is so incredibly important,' she says. 'If you don't have that control your work will be interfered with until it's gone out of your hands. I was always aware that things wouldn't be how I wanted them unless I was willing to fight.

Kate's involvement in what was known as the KT Bush Band was always going to be shortlived, as Del and his other musical collaborators realised, but they were happy to support her until that moment EMI were ready to whisk her off to fame and fortune. 'Right at the end of that period of playing the pub gigs in that band, we did a session for EMI at the White Elephant on the River,' he recalls, 'which was her first major showcase for the whole record company. It was quite nerve-racking for the rest of us, but Kate just breezed on and sang it. She breezed through the whole thing - it was really quite amazing.

'She always had this total self-belief in what she was going to do - there was never going to be any problem for her, from her own point of view. It was like an obsessive passion that she just had to go through. And in a lot of ways she's still like it now.' Of course, after that it was never quite the same for the KT Bush band without Katy Bush, and Del and Co were left stranded in temporary musical limbo while Kate was studio-bound. At that stage, Kate was too young and inexperienced to insist they play on her debut - 'she had to toe the party line a little,' says Del - so the producer bought his own players in to provide the necessary backing. However, even then Bush knew what she wanted and how to get it across. He may not have played on her debut LP, but Kate made sure Del got to design the artwork for the back of the sleeve, and that LP number two would have his name somewhere on the playing credits. 'She really wanted us to play on that album, but politically it wasn't right/he says. 'But when the second album came along in '78, we were able to do a few tracks - she really stuck out for us. I'm really grateful for that she's given me, personally, so many breaks.'

Bush is reluctant to go into details on her relationship with her uniquely understanding record comapany. Although obviously appreciative of the artistic freedom she's gained over the years she also observes: 'You have to fight for everything you want. Struggle is important. It's how you grow and how you change.'

Caught up in the first flush of success, Kate's early days were a flurry of activity and creative release. In 1978, both The Kick Inside and Lionheart albums were released, and in 1979 she embarked on her first and only, and now fairly legendary, live tour. 'As I remember it, it was very hard work,' says Del of the tour. 'I've never worked so hard as a musician before. We rehearsed for six months. In the morning she was coming up to town for dance lessons and learning dance routines, then in the afternoon we'd rehearse the band for six hours, then in the evening we were going back for production meetings. And she's still doing that kind of thing now with this film she's doing. She's a complete workaholic and a fanatic where her music's concerned.' Did she enjoy the tour? 'She really enjoyed it. It's a common fallacy that she didn't and that it was a bad experience for her, but she really enjoyed doing it. But I think what happened was, it took so much out of her, that it also took a little bit of her self-confidence. She then got into the studio immediately after that tour ended, in late '79, to start the third album, and she then got into producing. She co-produced it with the engineer she was working with at the time, and got completely into it. She thought, this is it, I really need to work in the studio for a few years and develop my own production techniques and music as a studio musician.' And Kate realised too that she'd have to distance herself from outside pressures to achieve what she wanted to achieve.

'I've always been tenacious when it comes to my work,' she says. 'And I became quickly aware of the outside pressures of being famous affecting my work. It seemed ironic that I was expected to do interviews and television work which took me away from the thing that had put me into that situation. It was no longer relevant that I wrote songs. I could see my work becoming something that had no thought in it, becoming a personality, which is never what I wanted. All I wanted was the creative process.' 'She's the most unlikely star,' adds Del. 'She does not like being famous, she really does not like it. She wants to be an ordinary person, but she wants to make music. She likes the idea of people getting something from what she does, but she doesn't want the fame aspect. She's not the sort of person who will ever go out clubbing. She just works, stays at home, goes to the theatre, goes to see films, and when she can she goes off on holiday. But that's very rare.'

It's hard to imagine Kate Bush padding around the house with her slippers on, but even superstars have to recharge their batteries. 'She really just lets herself go. I don't mean she puts on 30 stone. It's like "I'm not working any more, so I'm not going to let any of this stuff get into my head". She potters in the garden - she does gardening now - she watches TV, goes to the theatre, eats... And takes in a little music too... 'She doesn't like to listen to anything when she's working, but when she's resting she listens to lots of stuff. At the moment, she's really into Talk Talk - she finds a real affinity with them. And we had a whole period of getting into this Bulgarian music, and in the early days it was Irish music. Generally, there's not many modern bands she's into, though she likes the Utah Saints. They did a track with a piece of her vocal in it: they were really good about it, went through all the proper channels, asked if they could use it, gave her a royalty, and she thought it was great. She thought it was absolutely fantastic the way they'd actually used it. In fact, one time she thought it would be great to do something with them. It never came to pass, though...'

What did happen was the extended period of inactivity that lead to a four year gap between the last album 'The Sensual World, and the release of The Red Shoes. Beset by personal tragedy - the loss of many friends, the death of her mother and the breakdown of her personal, if not professional, relationship with Del- the creative process simply stopped. 'I just couldn't work,' she says. 'Singng is such a deeply personal thing to do, I couldn't manage it.' 'There's been a lot of upset,' adds Del, 'When her mother died, she really couldn't work for the best part of a year. But she soon got the urge to get back in there again. She has to work.' And when Bush works, she really works. Not content with producing just another LP, she's timed its release with the simultaneous release of an accompanying 50-minute film 'We've taken six tracks from the album and made a story line up from the title track.'

'It's about how Kate's a dancer and gets tricked into wearing a pair of red shoes, which are possessed and can't stop dancing,' adds Del, 'it's a bit like the old film, 'The Red Shoes (the 1948 British classic about a young ballerina torn between two lovers - one a struggling composer the other an autocratic dance impresario). It's her own interpretation of the idea. There's lots of dialogue, and Miranda Richardson and Lindsay Kemp are in it too. Kate's been busy writing the storyline and getting it organised.'

'It's something like Magical Mystery Tour,' Kate adds, 'But it's not like it at all. It's not finished I hate talking about anything until it's there. like talking to you about the album if you haven't heard the tracks. Completely ridiculous.'

Never one to explain herself when a well-turned musical phrase will do, Kate Bush remains something of an enigma; intensely private, guarded to the point of introversion, but always fantastically unique”.

There are horrendous interviews like this from Chrissie Iley from The Sunday London Times, which shows you what Kate Bush had to face! It is no wonder she waited twelve more years to follow The Red Shoes given the sort of promotion she had to endure! People who didn’t really listen to the music or were completely uninterested and insulting. The second interview I want to include, again, shows the kind of inane and rather insulting questions and lines of query. Nick Coleman chatted with Kate Bush for Time Out:

“The Red Shoes' is a ballet film made by Powell and Emeric Pressburger in 1948, telling the story of a dancer who is torn between the demands of a great impresario, who can help her to become an artist of destiny, and those of her composer/husband, who can bring her happiness. The story elides an old fairy tale and a take on the power struggle that raged between the dancer Nijinsky and Diaghilev, first director of the Ballet Russe. Bush says the song evolved out of a feeling she had one day at the piano of music running away with itself. The image in her mind 'was like horses galloping and running away, with the horses turned into running feet, and then shoes galloping away with themselves'. Which corresponded, conveniently enough, with the key fairy-tale element in the Powell film: the red pumps worn by the tragic ballerina, which are imbued with a magic that carries their wearer off in a terrible outpouring of expressiveness.

Bush contacted Powell shortly before he died, 'to see whether he'd be interested in working with me. He was the most charming man, so charming. He wanted to hear my music, so I sent him some cassettes and we exchanged letters occasionally, and I got a chance to meet him not so long before he died. He left a really strong impression on me, as much as a person as for his work. He was just one of those very special spirits, almost magical in a way. Left me with a big influence.'

Which makes some kind of sense. Powell's super-rich three-strip Technicolor, his English-ness, his 'expressiveness', his interest in the shadows cast by daylight; even, you could argue, his thematic preoccupation with islands, solitary souls and the unconfined spirit; these are some of Bush's favourite things.

'His work is just so... so beautiful,' says Kate, in her tiniest voice.

Meaning what, exactly?

'Well, there's such heart in his films. The way he portrayed women... that was particularly good and very interesting. His women are strong and they're treated as people...'

That's one kind of beauty.

'The heart, I think, is the main beauty. This human quality he has. Although there's clever shots in his films, they're not really used for effect, to be clever. They're used for an emotional effect. I'd call that a human quality. Like vulnerability. Also, I like the emotional qualities of the characters. I suppose in one way they're very English ...'

To combine her interest in Powell with her lust for new directions, and perhaps to solve one or two promotional problems, Bush has directed a 40-minute film interpreting six songs from the excellent 'Red Shoes' album. It will be premiered at the London Film Festival.

'I'll be very interested to see what people make of it. To see whether they regard it as a long promo video or as a short film,' she says.

Where do your stories come from?

'Oh, all kinds of sources but generally they come down to people. People's ideas or works. Films, books, they all lead back to someone else's ideas, which in turn lead back to someone's else's ideas...'

I've always assumed you must be a bit of an Angela Carter fan.

'Um, no. I don't think I know her stuff.'

She wrote 'Company Of Wolves' and was big, I believe, on pomegranates, the predatory nature of nature, the heat of female sexuality; that sort of thing.

'Oh, yes.' Bush smiles, and her dimple disappears.

Other post addressed to Kate Bush arrived which went unopened. Then one day a letter came for the attention of Catherine Earnshaw. This being ambiguous, Catherine opened it just to make sure. Inside was a note from a Harley Street doctor indicating that Catherine was fit as a fiddle. This was good news. Unfortunately, Catherine had not been to see a Harley Street doctor. She hastily sent the letter on to Bush's record company, blushing at her daftness in not remembering immediately that Catherine Earnshaw is the name of the storm-tossed tragic heroine of 'Wuthering Heights '.

You're 35 and you've been doing this since you were a teenager. How have you changed?

'I think I've changed quite a lot. Essentially I'm still the same person but I suppose I've grown up a lot, and learned a lot.'

What's made you grow up the most?

'You get lots of disappointments. I'm not sure that they make you grow up but they make you question intentions.' She pauses. 'But life is what makes you grow up.'

That's a fantastically evasive answer.

'It is quite evasive but I think it's true.' Still no dimple. 'It's hard to say... when I was young I was very idealistic, and I don't really think I am any more. I think I'm more... realistic. I think it's good to change. I think I'd be unhappy if I didn't change. It would mean I hadn't learnt anything.'

Do you ever get curious about living another way?

'I do. But so far I'm extremely lucky to be doing what I'm doing. I feel extremely lucky to have the opportunity to do it.’”.

I would advise any Kate Bush fan to buy The Red Shoes. It is an album that does not get the love it deserves! In 2018, Ben Hewitt wrote a feature for The Quietus marking twenty-five years of The Red Shoes. Often maligned and discussed, this album, as he writes, has so much to recommend. Some incredible music that needs to be reassessed and addressed. A fascinating chapter in Kate Bush’s career:

“The most powerful moments on The Red Shoes are its most intimate and personal. ‘Moments Of Pleasure’ starts with piano so soft and gentle it feels like it might vanish if you breathe too hard, before it’s swept up in Michael Kamen’s elegantly soul-stirring orchestral arrangement. Bush’s voice goes through a similar transformation, too, growing from a gentle flutter to something stronger, which makes her heartfelt cry on the chorus sound like a defiant refusal to be swallowed by grief: “Just being alive/ It can really hurt/ And these moments/ Are a gift from time.” Its outro remembers some of Bush’s lost friends – including guitarist Alan Murphy, producer John Barrett and lighting director Bill Duffield – and plays out like the closing credits of an old-fashioned weepy. Even more devastating is an old conversation she recalls with her mother, Hannah, who was ill while Bush was writing the song and who passed away before the album was released. “I can hear my mother saying ‘Every old sock needs an old shoe,’” remembers Bush warmly. “Isn’t that a great saying?” It is, even if it sticks a tennis ball-sized lump in your throat.

There’s emotional heft on ‘Top Of The City’, too, which takes a similar premise to ‘And So Is Love’ but adds higher stakes: Bush sits up in the skies, looking down at the lonely city below and hoping to find an answer. “I don’t know if I’m closer to Heaven, but it looks like Hell down there,” she declares, caught between exhilaration, melancholy and desperation: the moments of quiet calm are both beautiful and unsettling, with eerie pockets of silence hanging between delicate piano notes, until there’s a big, dramatic burst of violins and celestial backing vocals. “I don’t know if you’ll love me for it,” she yells wildly, forcing the moment to its crisis. “But I don’t think we should suffer for this/ There’s just one thing we can do about it.”

Hearing her equate emotional intimacy with scoffing mangoes and plums might suggest that The Red Shoes still has plenty of idiosyncrasies. There’s certainly something quintessentially Bushian about some of its songs, including the title cut, which soundtracks the fate of a girl who puts on a pair of red leather ballet shoes and dances a frantic Irish jig: it combines her fondness for Celtic sounds, old stories and classic film (The Red Shoes was written by Hans Christian Andersen and later adapted into a 1948 film directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, the former of whom Bush salutes on ‘Moments Of Pleasure’), and her shrill, possessed vocal makes it sound like a feverish fairytale. The steamy ‘The Song Of Solomon’, meanwhile, mixes a literary text and desire in the same way that ‘The Sensual World’ let Ulysses’ Molly Boom step off the page and experience physical pleasure. This time, there was no-one stopping Bush lifting lines from her chosen book, the Hebrew Bible, although the erotic charge of the chorus is all hers: “Don’t want your bullshit, yeah/ Just want your sexuality.”

That’s then followed by the absurdity of ‘Why Should I Love You?’ Bush had originally asked Prince to record backing vocals for the track, but he decided to take it apart and add guitars, keyboards and brass, too. Conventional wisdom is that great collaborations are the result of a shared vision, but ‘Why Should I Love You?’ is great even though there’s absolutely no shared vision whatsoever: for the first 60-odd seconds it’s built around Bush’s hushed vocal, until Prince’s huge rush of ecstatic, kaleidoscopic sound steamrolls everything in its path. It’s less the meeting of two minds and more the smashing together of two completely different styles, the most special of cut-and-shunt hybrids. (And somewhere, among all the hullabaloo, you’ll also hear backing vocals from Lenny Henry).

There’s another cameo on the closing song, the fantastically histrionic breakup ballad ‘You’re The One’, on which Jeff Beck’s dizzying, drawn-out guitar solo pushes Bush to an exhausting catharsis. Like so much of The Red Shoes, it finds her preparing to leave a lover to save herself, although this time she’s less bullish, more prone to tying herself in knots. “I’m going to stay with my friend/ Mmm, yes, he’s very good-looking,” she admits. “The only trouble is, he’s not you.” By the song’s end, she’s so frazzled by frustration and anguish that she lets rip a larynx-tearing shriek: “Just forget it, alright!” Bush, who had spoken of feeling emotionally burnt-out years before the album was released, was ready to withdraw, too: she vanished for 12 years until Aerial, and then went on hiatus for another six before returning with Director’s Cut. “I think there’s always a long, lingering dissatisfaction with everything I’ve done,” she said in 2011, glad to have the chance to right some of the wrongs that had been bothering her for 20-odd years. For me, though, the original album has always been enough: it might have its flaws, and there might be a handsome alternative, but just like Bush on ‘You’re The One’, I still want to keep going back”.

On 1st November, it will be thirty-two years since The Red Shoes was released. I have a lot of time for the album and love so many of the tracks. I doubt it will have anything written about it until maybe 2028, when it turns thirty-five. That is a pity. It is an album that I can come back to…

TIME and time again.