FEATURE: Spotlight: Elles Bailey

FEATURE:

Spotlight

PHOTO CREDIT: Blackham Images

Elles Bailey

__________

THOUGH this is an artist…

who has released her eighth album and has been in the industry for a while, it is a name that I think she be known to more people. An incredible talent, Elles Bailey is currently on a run of tour dates across the U.K., with a couple of U.S. dates in April. Bailey is a Bristol Americana, Blues, and Roots Rock artist. Since the release of her wonderful  2017 debut album, Wildfire, she has achieved multiple #1 UK Blues albums and has won multiple U.K. Americana and Blues awards. I have included her on my blog before, though this is the first Spotlight feature. Her new album, Can’t Take My Story Away, was released in January. I shall come to some recent interviews before finishing with a review of the album. Classic Rock spoke with Elles Bailey about her new album and “fame, vanity, mental health and the childhood trauma behind her smoke’n’honey battle cry”:

“What you see is what you get with Elles Bailey. No filter. No subject off limits. No stage-managed Zoom backdrop. And, as the Bristolian singer-songwriter points out with a cackle, no personal stylist to primp her for today’s video call.

Militantly independent for the best part of a decade, Bailey is now working with label Cooking Vinyl and promoted by Madonna’s PR agency; it’s feasible that eighth album Can’t Take My Story Away could turn her into the kind of singer that Britain reads about over its cornflakes.

“Fame is not something I aspire to,” she insists. “When I look at someone like Taylor Swift, I think: ‘Every moment of their life is documented.’ That feels to me like a trauma. I love Bonnie Raitt, Imelda May, Beth Hart – who have incredible catalogues, but if they were walking down the street you might not recognise them.”

Bailey’s voice, though, is unmistakable, like dry leaves crackling on a bonfire. “On this album I was trying to find my inner Mavis Staples, my inner Janis Joplin.” She laughs at her impudence. “You’ve got to aim high, haven’t you?”

That vocal, she points out, is the silver lining of almost dying in childhood.

“Just before my third birthday, I got viral and bacterial pneumonia,” she explains. “I was intubated, put in a coma for seventeen days. I had to relearn how to walk and talk – and my voice was completely different. Back then the tubes could damage your vocal cords. But I wouldn’t change it.”

Not long after, Bailey remembers her dad playing roots music around the house. “But then you’re eight years old and you want to be Baby Spice. It wasn’t until my early twenties, when I was doing my sports psychology dissertation, that Etta James’s Something’s Got A Hold On Me came on the radio and just stopped me in my tracks. That took me straight back in – Muddy Waters, Howlin’ Wolf, that whole Chess Records scene. I was reconnecting with The Band, but also discovering this new Americana, like Jason Isbell and The Civil Wars.”

Can’t Take My Story Away, produced by Temperance Movement guitarist Luke Potashnick, celebrates the high times on the summery Growing Roots (“It takes an amazing human on the other side of a marriage to accept this is your life”) and a flower power-sounding cover of Catfish’s Better Days. “I hope to god that better days are going to come our way,” she mutters, quoting the chorus, “because it does feel like the world is fucked. But we have to be the change.”

Dig deeper, though, and you’ll find lyrics that must have hurt Bailey to put down. “Starling is about losing a friend,” she says of the closing track’s sad sweep of strings. “She took her own life when I was in my twenties. It took a long time to write about that.

“And then,” she continues, “Tightrope is about my battle with mental health, in particular with intrusive thoughts. That came on really strong in 2017, and I had no idea what it was. For years, in secret, I just felt really shameful. When I had a baby, I prepared myself, like: ‘This is going to get really bad.’ And it did. But the midwives found me help, and it was so liberating to find someone to talk to about it.”

Thankfully, alongside those songs in the tracklist is the gliding Dandelion, whose sentiment can be summed up as ‘life is a bin fire, but we’ll tough it out somehow’.

“That goes back to the pandemic, when I’d take my hour-a-day walk and see dandelions everywhere. I Googled them, and it said they can grow in the harshest conditions, and I was like: ‘That’s quite reflective of what we’re going through.’ I guess it was still in that moment where I was like: ‘We’re all gonna come out of this as better humans, and it’ll be a better world.’ I was blissfully naive. But it’s hope that gets us through, isn’t it?”

Bailey has grave concerns for the next generation of grass-roots musicians (“The industry feels really broken right now. For the upcoming artists that are three, four, five years behind me, it’s just getting harder”). But with a dynamite new album, tour dates in early 2026, her story is turning into a real page turner”.

I have admired Elle’s Bailey’s music for years now. Even though she is not a new artist, she is someone perhaps that has not reached every corner. Every home and radio station. That should change, as she is one of our most remarkable artists. I wanted to highlight this interview from Americana UK from February:

“AUK: So, you have a new album coming out. Tell me what gets your juices flowing to write songs.

EB: I think it’s something that always sits and simmers underneath. And I’m always inspired by everything around me, but I must admit, I go through phases. I’m not hugely inspired right now to write any music because I’m writing release campaigns. But the one thing is that I don’t wait for inspiration to hit; I will go and find the inspiration, if that makes sense. I’m someone who actively seeks out a song rather than waiting for a song to seek me out.

AUK: You mostly are using co-writers.

EB: That’s because I just love collaboration. I’ve always co-written because I started when I was 13 or 14, writing my own stuff. But I was in a band with my brother from a really early age, so we wrote together. I wrote for myself a bit, and then as I got into more roots music, there’s so much collaboration there. I really enjoy learning from other songwriters and hearing people’s different takes on ideas. It’s all about human connection for me, and the more the merrier.

AUK: Besides your producer, is there anyone you rely upon to critique new material?

EB: It would probably be my brother. He’s still involved and likes to give what he thinks. Sometimes my parents’ family; they’re really supportive, but what’s interesting is often they can’t hear the bigger picture. So, it’s quite nice to play them a song, and then play them the finished song.

AUK: Songwriting has always had this interesting relationship between honoring its roots and exploring paths not yet taken. Do you find a balance between continuing the tried and true in your music and stepping outside the box?

EB: I try not to think of a box. For me, I don’t think of a genre and think this is how we’re going to write today. We just write a song. I remember writing ‘Constant Need to Keep Going,’ and that was not the song I expected to come out of that songwriting session because the album didn’t really have this country feel at that point. I wrote the song with Luke (Potashnick), and it was probably the last song we were writing for the album. It came out sort of alt country, like, I’m so tired. I started today. I fall right out of bed. It was quite upbeat, a bit tongue in cheek.

PHOTO CREDIT: Blackham Images

AUK: Speaking of finding your voice, your vocals are very soulful. Did it just come out that way or did you develop a style from listening to musicians you liked?

EB: The story behind my voice is, you can hear it’s very husky, like I’ve been smoking a hundred a day. I sounded like this ever since I was in a coma when I was a child, and my voice was irrevocably changed by being incubated. When I was younger, I had a higher range and I would kind of sing over the huskiness. It was only really in my twenties that I’d started to find these sorts of levels of my voice that I didn’t realize I had. And they have gradually evolved as I’ve got stronger as a singer and more confident as an artist. I’ll listen to what other vocalists are doing and think, “Oh, I wonder if I can do something like that. ” But my voice has definitely had a unique starting point from that huskiness that wasn’t there before I got sick.

AUK: Your outfits on stage are striking, and I’ve very rarely seen you without a hat. Are hats kind of your thing?

EB: They very much used to be but not so much recently. I started wearing hats because I’d rock out so much on stage, and I’d basically headbang and give myself whiplash because I’m not very good at headbanging. So, I started wearing a hat to stop that and calm my performance down. Now, I’m definitely a lot more at home on stage as I’ve got well into my career. I don’t wear the hats so much. If you see me wearing a hat now, it’s probably because I haven’t washed my hair for four days.

AUK: What is one quality in your music that you find people really relate to?

EB: People tell me they really relate to my voice, but I think as I’ve got more confidence as an artist, that maybe my songwriting has become more personal, though at the same time more universal. I think people relate to that too. The more honest you are with yourself, actually, the more you open yourself up to be more universal, because we often experience similar things at different times in our lives”.

I am going to end with a review for Can’t Take My Story Away from Blues Rock Review. Already a contender for the album of the year, if you do not know Elles Bailey then make sure you check out her music and go and see her live if you can. She is truly one of the most talented and distinct artists out there. Growing stronger with every album, this is an artist with many years ahead:

 “It is always an exciting time for me when I am able to review great artists I am not very familiar with. Such is the case with Elles Bailey. I had heard her name a few times and may have heard some of her music previously, but I had not really listened to just how amazing a vocalist and artist she truly is. With her new studio release, Can’t Take My Story Away, that issue has resolved itself.

This is the fifth studio release for Bailey, a singer, songwriter, and musician. Exposed to music at a young age by musical parents and her dad’s personal record collection, she progressed quickly to front an indie band as a teenager. Bailey reportedly developed her soulful, bluesy voice after being stricken with pneumonia as a young child. From there, she has risen to become a multi-award-winning artist in the blues genre, winning Artist of the Year from the UK Blues Awards in 2020, 2021, and 2023. She has opened or performed with notable artists such as Don McLean, Van Morrison, Eric Gales, Mike Farris, and Walter Trout.

“Growing Roots,” the second cut of the eleven-track album Can’t Take My Story Away, offers very sing-along-friendly lyrics paired with some great guitar work. Elles Bailey sings, “It’s like I’m growing roots. They’re growing right into you.” By the way, you can catch the official video for this catchy tune on YouTube. “Better Days,” which also has an official video on YouTube, delivers more great, soulful vocals along with some really nice guitar fills. “People, I know we’re bound for better days. I said people, better days will come our way.” If this song does not lift you up, then you must be tied down tight to the ground.

Track eight of Can’t Take My Story Away is “Angel.” It is an upbeat tune with a really nice groove and an R&B feel. Bailey sings, “Whenever you’re lost to the darkness, I’ll be your angel. We all have times when we get so afraid.” “Tightrope” is a slower-paced ballad and is really nicely done. “The harder you hurt, the brighter you burn, the faster you go up in flames.” Throughout this great album, I cannot help but hear reminders of Bonnie Bramlett in her early career, and for me, that is comparing Elles Bailey to one of the greats.

As I do with many reviews, I went back and listened to other recordings to refresh my memory and expand my knowledge of the artist. I did this with Elles Bailey and simply find her career and talent to be growing stronger and stronger. For those not very familiar with her music, I would suggest checking out some of her previous works, after listening to Can’t Take My Story Away, of course. She will also be touring in Europe and the USA in 2026, and as always, live performances are often the best way to experience what an artist is truly about. We should all look forward to hearing more great music from Elles Bailey in the future.

The Review: 8.5/10”.

The brilliant Elles Bailey is such an awe-inspiring artist. In terms what she has gone through when it came to childhood trauma and contracting viral and bacterial pneumonia and how that altered her voice. Since then, she has embarked on a music career and is this artist with so many fans behind her. She commands so much love and respect. If Elles Bailey is a new name to you, then do go and follow her, as she has…

MANY years in music ahead.

___________

Follow Elles Bailey

PHOTO CREDIT: Blackham Images

Official:

https://www.ellesbailey.com/

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/ellesbailey/

TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@ellesbailey

YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/EllesBailey

Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/ellesbailey/

FEATURE: Roll Up… Kate Bush’s The Tour of Life at Forty-Seven

FEATURE:

 

 

Roll Up…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush performs on stage for The Tour of Life at Carre, Amsterdam, Netherlands on 29th April, 1979/PHOTO CREDIT: Rob Verhorst/Redferns

Kate Bush’s The Tour of Life at Forty-Seven

__________

IT was sort of like…

The Beatles’ Magical Mystery Tour. Kate Bush and her crew and players travelling across the U.K. and Europe for The Tour of Life in 1979. It was her one and only tour. Because the warm-up gig was on 2nd April, 1979, I want to mark forty-seven years of this spectacular. It is the build-up of the events leading to the first show that are of particular interest. I will draw in a feature I have included before. I am going to turn to Graeme Thomson’s Under the Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush. There was a lot of preparation and build-up. To draw everything together, it was a huge process. However, given the rapturous reception from critics and the adoring crowds, it was a massive success. However, it did lose Kate Bush money, as she had to invest in it. EMI only put up a certain amount of money, but because the show was more ambitious and larger than the label could budget for, Bush had to put her own money in. I don’t think there had been any live tour since Kate Bush’s 1979 triumph. In terms of combining magic, mine, poetry and dance together with music, it was almost like a theatrical production rather than a traditional concert. Graeme Thomson suggests how there were elements of Guys and Dolls and Wacky Races. Seduction, cartoonish energy and trench-coated gangsters. Aspects of musicals and films. Thirteen people on stage and seventeen costume changes. A lot hinged on this tour. After two albums and all of this press attention and success, it could have failed. In terms of it being accessible and popular but also spectacular, the balance was just right. From the costumes and sets and lighting, through to the cuisine for the show, Bush was calling most of the shots. She was still only twenty!

It is amazing that she had the energy and maturity and focus to make sure that The Tour of Life was something truly different and representative of her. Although the first show was at the Liverpool Empire on 3rd April, 1979, there was a warm-up gig in Poole the night before. Maybe there was expectation that Bush would regularly tour and this was the first chapter. However, it was not until 2014 for Before the Dawn when she would embark on another large-scale live production. Perhaps there was something to prove after her second album, Lionheart, did not get great reviews. The Tour of Life was partly a sort of contractual obligation and what was expected. However, Bush wanted to make it both spectacular and exciting but also something she was in control of because she did not have too much say or production input into her first two albums. Hilary Walker, heads of EMI’s international division, helped crack Bush’s music outside of the U.K. Bush asked Walker to leave EMI and work with her. Not strictly her manager, Walker handled a lot of the day-to-day stuff and was this tough and straight-talking person who was there to intercept any unwanted request and make decisions that were not important or essential, as Bush was busy preparing this important tour. Whilst Bush still had some promotion in 1979 and she performed Wow in Italy and Switzerland, she was clearing a path between Lionheart and The Tour of Life. Being this successful and public artist, Bush was offered opportunities and acting roles. Two roles in horror films (one as a vampire). The opportunity to sing the theme to the James Bond film, Moonraker (which went to Shirley Bassey) – which Bush did not feel she was right to -, and she did briefly pop into the studio in February 1979 to record Magician for The Magician of Lublin, Menwhem Golan’s interpretation of Isaac Beshevis Singer’s 1960 novel. Most of the focus, however, was on preparing for the tour.

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush performing at the Falkoner Centre (Falkoner Centret) in Copenhagen, Denmark on 26th April, 1979 during The Tour of Life/PHOTO CREDIT: Jorgen Angel/Redferns

Bush hated seeing gigs where bands would play the songs and just walk off. If most of her live performances to this point were quite limited in terms of what she could do on stage and how dynamic they would be, The Tour of Life afforded her the chance to be more ambitious and cinematic. 2014’s Before the Dawn was less alienated in terms of the experience of a live concert and what was around it. Other artists putting out these big and multi-faceted performances that mixed different visual elements, sets and costumes. In 1979, there was a lot of Punk and New Wave. The concerts were very basic and not concerned with stimulating the senses of being this multi-layered visual and audio experience. The tour was meant to start in March 1979 but was pushed back as Bush needed more time for it to all come together to her satisfaction. Bush started preparation for The Tour of Life in Christmas 1978. Set designer David Jackson met Kate Bush at EMI’s offices to discuss the tour and sets. She was surrounded by management types and, though he prepared this portfolio for her to look at, Bush very much took the lead. It was a bit looser than he imagined and a bit impromptu and freewheeling. Despite a slightly chaotic feel and a lack of solid direction, Jackson was won over. He met Bush at East Wickham Farm in early-January to discuss the set and lighting. Even if Bush was not exactly clear with her vision and directions, she was full of ideas. Bursting with ideas and enthusiasm, it wads a case getting it all done and making it make sense. Working with wardrobe assistant Lisa Hayes for the costumes, there was also the issue of getting the musicians together. Brian Bath, Paddy Bush (her brother) and Del Palmer (her boyfriend) were in the fold having not really been part of her first two albums – Paddy was on The Kick Inside, but Lionheart was the second where producer Andrew Powell used the musicians he wanted – were core to the sound and feel of the show. The band grew larger and it was amazing she managed to balance things and did not burn out. The band were drilled for three months so things came together. Bush worked through January and February with choreographer Anthony Van Lasst on routines at The Place in Euston. This was the most collaborative aspect of the tour, as Bush was still learning dance and did need a lot of direction and input from Van Lasst.

There was the matter of the set being built. I think that took about six weeks to all form. Graeme Thomson notes how, in March 1979, things moved to The Show’s sound stage at Shepperton Film Studios. “Huge mirrors were installed at the back of the room so everyone onstage could see what was going on and how they were projecting themselves”. The musicians could see the dance and dancers. The world of music and arts/theatre coming together. Its thirteen musicians, like Del Palmer, who wondered what was happening and what they had got themselves in for! I have skipped some details regarding the nuts and bolts. However, it is clear how involved Kate Bush was and what was at stake. She put so much of her time into The Tour of Life. It was the cost of the tour that is eye-watering. Up to £250,000 in 1979 (around 1.4-1.6 million in today’s money), EMI only put up “token support funds”. Having made the label so much money, it is shocking Bush basically had to fund everything. I am not sure what they had in mind for the tour with the meagre money they stumped up! Maybe they felt a four-piece shuttled in a van was going to be what we were dealing with. However, a whole cast and crew and all this set and lighting was more realistic. There were constant battles regarding negotiating a bigger budget. The cast and crew tired before things even started! However, things had been rehearsed and everything was set for 2nd April at Poole Art Centre in Dorset. Bush was not performing for the media and their approval, it was to prove to herself she could do this and realise her expectations. The first official night – 3rd April, 1979 in Liverpool – was one of the biggest and most important (and divisive) live events ever. On 3rd April, 1979 at the Liverpool Empire Theatre, the BBC’s Bernard Clark noted how there were conflicting emotions and this unsettling mood. Not knowing whether it would be a mad and unfocused mess or a funeral. Kate Bush herself was terribly nervous and Brian Southall, representing EMI, was flying the company flag and not sure what would lie in store.

Performing every song from The Kick Inside and Lionheart (both 1978) bar Oh to Be in Love, the reviews and audience reaction spoke for itself! The relief that this exceptional and unique live extravaganza had not only come together but seemed seamless and fully-formed from that first night. Kate Bush, with her team and crew, had pulled off something truly unheard of and seismic! I have not even mentioned how she managed to deliver this triumphant performance on 3rd April, 1979, considering how the night before, after the warm-up show in Dorset, Bill Duffield was killed. He was the lighting director who tragically died after the show when he was racing around the venue to see if any clothes, bags and items had been left behind before everything was shut down. He fell through a gap in the flooring onto hard concrete. Someone had left an open panel. Faced with whether to cancel the tour or carry on, she had all that on her shoulders and in her heart and she had to go on and look unaffected and professional. Truly one of the most astonishing acts of resilience, professionalism and bravery in live music history! Forty-seven years later and you can feel and see the influence of The Tour of Life today. Major Pop artists and how they are combining multimedia aspects and multiple costume changed. Bush was not the first to do this, though she was one of the first female Pop artists to do so. Madonna definitely influenced by her. Taylor Swift and some of the biggest artists ever. The legacy Bush left, having invested huge amount of money and fought so hard to get her visions and concepts realised! I am ending with snippets of this feature from PROG that was published last year. The fact that it took five months to pull together and Bush could not write new material is perhaps a major reason it was her only tour – and it took thirty-five years before she was on the stage with Before the Dawn:

“I saw our show as not just people on stage playing the music, but as a complete experience,” she later explained. “A lot of people would say ‘Pooah!’ but for me that’s what it was. Like a play.”

Indeed it was – or perhaps several plays in one. On Egypt, she emerged dressed as a seductive Cleopatra. On Strange Phenomena, she was a magician in top hat and tails, dancing with a pair of spacemen. Former single Hammer Horror replicated the video, with a black-clad Bush dancing with a sinister, black-masked figure behind her, while Oh England My Lionheart cast her as a World War II pilot.

Like every actor, she was surrounded by a cast of strong supporting characters. As well as dancers Stewart Avon Arnold and Gary Hurst, several songs featured Drake, who performed his signature ‘floating cane’ trick during L’Amour Looks Something Like You. And then there was John Carder Bush reciting his poetry before The Kick Inside, Symphony In Blue (fused with elements of experimental composer Erik Satie’s Gymnopédie 1) and the inevitable encore, Wuthering Heights.

But at the heart of it all was Bush, whirling and waving, reaching for the sky one moment, swooping to the floor the next. Occasionally she looked like she was concentrating on what was coming next. More often, she looked lost in the moment.

“When I perform, that’s just something that happens in me,” she later said. “It just takes over, you know. It’s like suddenly feeling that you’ve leapt into another structure, almost like another person, and you just do it.”

Brian Southall was in the audience at the Liverpool Empire. Despite the fact he worked for EMI, he had no idea what to expect. “You just sat in the audience and went, ‘Wow’. It was extraordinary. Bands didn’t take a dancer onstage, they didn’t take a magician onstage, even Queen at their most lavish or Floyd at their most extravangant. They might have used tricks and props in videos, but not other people onstage.

“That was the most interesting thing about it – her handing it over to other people, who became the focus of attention. That’s something that never bothered Kate – that ‘I will be onstage all the time and you will only see me.’ It was like a concept album, except it was a concept show.”

Two and a quarter hours later, this ‘concept show’ was done and the real world intruded once again. If there was any sense of celebration afterwards, then the main attraction was keeping it to herself. “I remember sitting in the bar after the show at Liverpool and Kate wasn’t there. She was with Del,” says Southall. “She wasn’t an extrovert offstage. There were two people. There was that person you saw onstage, in that extraordinary performance, and then offstage there was this fairly shy, reserved person.”

Her reluctance to indulge in the usual rock’n’roll behaviour was both characteristic and understandable. It was a draining performance, night after night as the tour continued around Britain and then into Europe. It was hard work for everyone involved.

“We went out, but not exceptionally,” says Stewart Avon Arnold. “We weren’t out raving until seven o’clock in the morning on heroin. There’s no way we could have done the show the next day.”

They occasionally found time to let their hair down. The Sunday Mail reported that certain members of the touring party indulged in a water-and-pillow fight at a hotel in Glasgow, causing a reported £1,000 damage. EMI allegedly agreed to foot the bill, though they stressed that the singer wasn’t present during this PG-rated display of on-the-road carnage.

After 10 shows in mainland Europe, the tour returned to London for three climactic dates at the Hammersmith Odeon between May 12 and 14. The second of these shows was arranged as tribute to the late Bill Duffield. Bush and her band were joined onstage by Peter Gabriel and Steve Harley. The pair tackled various Bush songs (Them Heavy People, a renamed The Woman With the Child In Her Eyes) and played their own songs (Gabriel’s Here Comes The Flood and I Don’t Remember, Harley’s Best Years Of Our Lives and Come Up And See Me), before everyone came onstage for a cover of The Beatles’ Let It Be.

“Kate asked us all to come and sing with Peter and Steve,” says Avon Arnold. “We were onstage, singing chorus with these two icons. And I’m not a singer. It was an emotional night.”

48 hours later, the tour was over. And so was Kate Bush’s career as a live artist – at least for another 35 years”.

More than it being Kate Bush’s sole tour, The Tour of Life was a revelation and true first. As one of her dancers, Stewart Avon Arnold revealed for that 2025 feature: “She’s an innovator. She did things that had never been done before. She was the first one in this country to merge creative rock music with creative dance. She didn’t have a genre. She had a mentality”. Forty-seven after The Tour of Life started its run and wowed crowds, you can feel how it revolutionised live performance. Its mark being made on Pop tours to this very day. Something that is…

TRULY mind-blowing to behold.

FEATURE: In the Warm Rooms: Kate Bush: The Private and the Personal

FEATURE:

 

 

In the Warm Rooms

PHOTO CREDIT: Guido Harari

Kate Bush: The Private and the Personal

__________

UNLIKE any other artist…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush photographed on 3rd October, 1983/PHOTO CREDIT: Sunday Mirror/Mirrorpix/Getty Images

there has been, Kate Bush seems to straddle the superstar and surreal with the normal and domestic. Touching on this before, it is so hard to remain grounded and private when you are a massive success. Some major artists do love the fame and attention, though most prefer to be left alone and let the music speak. That idea that you have to be flash and out all of the time. For Kate Bush, the ambition was to make music. She did not want to be this megastar and get a load of press attention. Kate Bush is this classic example of someone who definitely can be seen as a major artist but managed to remain humble and private. Some would say hidden. With that, there was a lot of press rumours and intrusion. One of her songs, Mrs. Bartolozzi from 2005’s Aerial, is about a woman who is washing the floor and doing the laundry but is seeing the clothes flap in the breeze and entwine in the washing machine. However, she also seems like this extraordinary and almost filmic character. Bush is no stranger to the finer things in life. She lives in these incredible homes and has definitely indulged in luxury now and then. However, it is the way she conducted her life away from music. The domestic side. I am thinking back to 1983 and how she implemented life changes and had this blissful summer.  Moving away from London and to the countryside – her family home in Welling, Kent -, Bush also spent time gardening, hanging with friends and her boyfriend (Del Palmer) and going to films. She built her own studio, took up dance again and prepared one healthy meal a day. Moving to a farmhouse in the Kent countryside in 1983, this was a transformative year. Rather than rehash that old subject about Bush and the domestic, I wanted to tie it to work. How, when Bush was putting her personal life and happiness first, she was very much at her best as a creative.

That may seem obvious. If artists are contended and calm, then that will affect thew quality of their work. Prior to 1983, Bush was moving between studios, working all hours and not living the healthiest life. I feel 1983 was the first time Bush had to concentrate on her personal life, as she was on the promotional treadmill since 1978! However, as someone dedicated to work and always looking at the next album, it was perhaps a sacrifice changing things. I do wonder about London today and the lure for creatives. You have access to venues and a lot of like-minded people. However, how much of a healthy stimulus is the city? Its smog and busyness is not necessarily conducive to better mental health. However, the countryside and quieter areas might not be stimulating enough. With Kate Bush, she did produce a lot of tremendous work when she was working in London. She managed to enjoy downtime and was happy there, though I feel it was when she moved away and bought property away from the capital when she really began to feel settled and had that balance right. When Bush moved to the countryside and spent the summer of 1983 outside of the house, she did confirm she was dating Del Palmer and confirmed that commitment. I think Bush was perhaps happier when the domestic took more of a lead than the professional. Could Kate Bush ever be private and enjoy a normal life?! I feel she can now and, as she does not need to give regular interviews, she can truly be private. However, in the 1980s especially, she was never truly able to escape celebrity and the demands of the industry. The most wonderful moments and images are when you think about Kate Bush enjoying the normal and almost mundane. Her in the garden in 1983 just before Hounds of Love came together. How she and Del would watch Saturday night game shows and how he gifted her with an antique watch on her birthday. The late Del Palmer revealed how there were two sides to Kate Bush. This superstar who was one of the biggest artists in the world; someone who was just Kate around the house and had no airs and graces.

Palmer asked what she saw in him. That was him being modest. Clearly, she wanted someone who was a good influence and understood her. He was a musician and engineer for her for most of her career. Bush was singing, dancing and writing in 1983 and it was that perfect balance of work and home life. Taking her back to 1976 and a happy time then. I feel Bush was also quite settled and domestic around making The Sensual World. Towards the end of the 1980s, maybe Bush feeling she was at a stage in her life when things needed to change. In spite of the fact Kate Bush was able to find a great home and live this relatively normal and happy life away from the spotlight, she was still someone who was being written about and had professional commitments. I am strangely fascinated by the ordinariness of Kate Bush’s life, as she is this extraordinary artist who was very much at the forefront and in the spotlight for such a long time. I love all those minor details and how it has not really been written about enough. All of this harmony and focus on the personal directly feeds into her work. One might feel that too much focus on the private and personal can damage a career. However, a comparative lack of output from Kate Bush from the end of the 1980s through to 2005 was actually beneficial. Rather than produce multiple albums and the quality dipping and her career being affected, Bush was actually ensuring that her career could continue. You look at mainstream artists today and whether they are allowed a balance. Committing so much time to touring, social media and releasing music, they also live in cities and there is perhaps not the opportunity or space to focus on the domestic and their private lives, Putting that first. Few artists have the same flexibility as Kate Bush when it comes to take time between albums. However, there is something about her career that we should apply to modern artists. So much focus on constant output. How healthy is it for artists to be always be working and have to commit so much of themselves to their careers?! Even if some of Kate Bush’s best work came early in her career, I think the importance of her home and what she was doing away from music was essential when it came to her most influential work. The minor and domestic very much influenced and effected the major and commercial. Kate Bush is a major artist who has released some of the greatest albums ever, yet she has also managed to have autonomy and think about her personal life and change things for the better. A big reason to admire and highlight…

A remarkable human.

FEATURE: The Modern Embodiments of Kate Bush: Is There Anyone Who Comes Close?

FEATURE:

 

 

The Modern Embodiments of Kate Bush

Is There Anyone Who Comes Close?

__________

THERE is always talk…

IN THIS PHOTO: Florence Welch (Florence + The Machine)/PHOTO CREDIT: Linda Brownlee/The Guardian

about a new artist being the new so-and-so. We all lazily compare artists to those who came before, as it makes them more identifiable and something to moor to. Maybe there are very few true originals. However, I do think that it is a disservice to the artist they are being compared to. I am not sure whether we get anyone saying a band is the new version of The Beatles. Or The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin or The Who. The Kinks. David Bowie. Maybe Madonna is being linked to newer artists. However, there have been articles and opinions when it comes to who is the new or next Kate Bush. I always say that nobody can equal her, so it is futile asking which new artist or a mainstream act who can take her place. Kate Bush is still recording and active, so there does not need to be a new version of her. However, I have talked enough about Bush’s growing influence and how so many of the great albums from the past year or so can be linked to Kate Bush oin some way. Women, anyway, and how they are fans of hers or you can hear some of her work in others. Although there is nobody today who can equal Kate Bush and is exactly like her, I do think there are modern embodiments. In terms of artists who either shift between albums or have a similar trajectory. Maybe their fashion and aesthetic is similar to Kate Bush. I feel The Last Dinner Party have elements of Kate Bush. They are inspired by her and there is definitely a feel of Bush in terms of their fashion and a sense of theatricality. Darker elements in their new album, From the Pyre, reminiscent of Kate Bush. Florence + The Machine, too. Everybody Scream, their latest album, definitely channels Kate Bush. Florence Welch is someone who summons comparisons to Kate Bush. Her vocal style and even her stage presence. One can say that Florence Welch is the closest we get to a ‘modern Kate Bush’.

Rather than distil a true original and suggest anyone can topple the queen, there is inevitable talk around Kate Bush now and whether any new artists are similar to her. I am hearing people talk about Perfume Genius and FKA twigs being Kate Bush-esque. Bold sonic ambition and experimentation. A visual aspect. Given the popularity of Kate Bush now, it is only a matter of time before there are features published asking who the new Kate Bush is. However, when it comes to someone prominent today who seems to be most like Kate Bush, I would say it is Charli xcx. I have written about her a lot, because she recorded the soundtrack from the “Wuthering Heights” film. Naturally, you got people linking Charli xcx to Kate Bush. The Guardian noted this in a recent article:

“Move over Kate Bush! The new voice of “Wuthering Heights” is Charli xcx, whose haunting soundtrack to Emerald Fennell’s new big screen reimagining of Emily Brontë’s gothic tale of love, heartbreak and haunting is poised to darken and deepen our aural landscape.

The recording artist has form with era-defining albums – 2024’s epochal Brat was a summer phenomenon that found its way into that year’s US presidential election. But inspired by Fennell’s take on Brontë’s masterpiece, the mood has turned murky and melancholy. “I think I’m going to die in this house,” intones the deep-voiced refrain on House, the pop singer’s collaboration with the legendary John Cale, which was the first track to be released from the new album. “I’d rather watch my skin bleed/ In the eye of your storm,” she sings on Chains of Love, a moody synth-pop ballad that heightened the sense of gothic romance in the trailer ahead of the film’s 13 February release for Galentine’s Day and Valentine’s Day.

“I sent the script to Charli with a view to asking her simply if she had an emotional response to it, would she like to make a song about it?” says Fennell. “And she called me and asked if she could do an album. Of course I said yes. And then she just started sending me just the most incredible things that were new, sexy, emotionally engaging.”

Charli xcx has called the sound “raw, wild, sexual, gothic and British”. It’s the acoustic equivalent of getting caught in a squall on the Yorkshire moors while wearing one of Oscar-winning costume designer Jacqueline Durran’s lavish creations”.

Many might see only minor links between Charli xcx and Kate Bush. However, it is clear that the former is a massive fan of the latter. She treads her own path. An album like BRAT is not really comparable to any Kate Bush album. Bits of Hounds of Love or The Dreaming, perhaps. However, I do thank that the way Charli xcx evolves between album and shifts course makes me think about Kate Bush. Touches of Hounds of Love, The Kick Inside, The Sensual World and The Dreaming in other Charli xcx albums. I do feel we will even hear an expansive and rich work like Aerial impact Charli xcx. In terms of a personal, eclectic and shifting style and these different looks. The way Chali xcx is their hugely engaging photographic subject. I do think of Kate Bush. I know Bush will know Charli xcx’s music and, whilst they will probably never collaborate, you cannot blame me for feeling Charli xcx is the closest we have to a modern incarnation of Kate Bush. Rather than it being about replacement and forgetting the divine Kate Bush, it someone today who seems to carry her torch. Hearing how Charli xcx talks in interviews. That combination of quick humour, sweetness, confidence and the way she deals with the press and interviewers when they are a bit sexiest or foolish. There is this boldness and experimentation in the music. Charli xcx can release sensual and beautiful music but also bombastic and strange songs. The nature and feel of her videos too. How indeliable they are. I do feel and see Kate Bush through that. Popmatters observed this in their review of Charli xcx’s latest album: “Both women were inspired by a deeply British book, channelling Celtic heritage to transform the work into something more idiosyncratic and angular. The Wuthering Heights soundtrack features Velvet Underground bassist John Cale on “House”, an eerie and ghostly recital. An austere cello bolsters the backdrop, brimming with an angular confidence. Where Bush relied on her Irish heritage to guide her, Charli XCX turns to Welsh folk music, immersing the work with memory, madness and hiraeth. “Dying for You” features textured soundscapes and a complex, multi-segmented pop number that shifts in tempo and timbre. “All the pain and torture I went through,” the vocalist screams, emulating the sensual urges felt between Cathy and Heathcliff”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Charli xcx/PHOTO CREDIT: Paul Kooiker

Other people may have different views about which modern artist seems most like Kate Bush. Anna von Hausswolff might spring to mind. However, when we look at the genius of Kate Bush and everything that makes her such an influential artist, I do turn to Charli xcx. Of course, as I say, both artists are distinct and doing their own thing. I am not sure whether Charli xcx would want to be compared so heavily to Kate Bush, even if she is influenced by her and is an obvious fan. That said, I look back at her earliest albums like 2014’s SUCKER and chart it through Charli (2019) and Crash (2022) and you can feel the same sort of shifts and sonic changes that Kate Bush had through her career Charli xcx is only thirty-three and she has decades ahead. She is a more prolific artist than Kate Bush and is involved in a lot of acting projects. There are aspects of her life and career that you cannot compare to Kate Bush. I think the way Charli xcx takes control of her career and is wrestling to have her say and make sure it is her true artistic vision even reminds me of Kate Bush right from the start. In 1978, when she fought to have Wuthering Heights released as her debut single. Charli xcx has this filmic and dramatic nature of her videos. Stylish and ambitious. A certain eccentricity and provocative nature that you can also trace to Kate Bush. It would be wonderful if the two artists met. In a way, Charli xcx has helped get Kate Bush’s Wuthering Heights back in the charts and heard by a new wave of listeners. A contentious debate to introduce, you can understand why I am excited to see any artist who has that spirit of Kate Bush. In time, I do feel we will see a lot of newer artists very much taking a similar course to Kate Bush. Right now, I really feel Charli xcx has so much in her that makes me love and admire Kate Bush. Charli xcx and the depth of her sound. That quest for autonomy. A gothic nature to some of the music. Inspiration drawn from literature and film. Of course, look at other artists like Chappell Roan and you know she owes a certain debt to Kate Bush. Looking around at those challenging Pop convention and being this singular artist, who gets closest to Kate Bush? Even if nobody can ever be her – and they are not trying to be-, there are those who certainly summon the spirit and bones of Kate Bush and her remarkable music. The icon of music affecting and shaping modern music…

IN so many ways.

FEATURE: International Women’s Day: The Best Albums from Female Artists from the Past Year

FEATURE:

 

 

International Women’s Day

IN THIS PHOTO: Mitski

The Best Albums from Female Artists from the Past Year

__________

RATHER than write about…

IN THIS PHOTO: Olivia Dean for Adidas

female dominance in the industry and how they are defining the sound of today, I wanted to collate songs from the best albums made by women since last International Women’s Day. That would be 8th March, 2025. This International Women’s Day is a chance to recognise the brilliance of women right across the music industry. From studios through to promotion and venues, right to the forefront, they are making a huge contribution to the industry and economy. Last year was a stunning one in terms of albums released by female artists. This year is shaping up to be another huge one. Mitski put out Nothing's About to Happen to Me recently. That is one of the best albums of this year and another masterpiece. Hilary Duff, Charli xcx and Madison Beer have also released incredible albums. Last year, there were gems from Florence + The Machine, CMAT, Coco Jones, ROSALÍA and so many other queens. The playlist at the end of this feature recognises the brilliance of female artists and how, year in year out, they are delivering the very best music. 2026 is shaping up already to be another where they dominate. I hope the industry one day acknowledges that and there is greater parity and opportunities. In terms of pay and opportunities. That misogyny is properly tackled. I wanted to show love and respect for amazing women through music. The mixtape below are songs taken from the best albums made by women since International Women’s Day last year. Proof that they are…

RULING music.

FEATURE: Big Time: Peter Gabriel’s So at Forty

FEATURE:

 

 

Big Time

Peter Gabriel’s So at Forty

__________

ONE of the all-time…

greatest albums ever turns forty on 19th May. Peter Gabriel’s So is his fifth studio album. Many consider it to be his best. In terms of the quality of the songwriting throughout, it is undoubtably a masterpiece. Big Time, Sledgehammer, Red Rain, In Your Eyes and Don’t Give Up. The album reached the top of the charts in the U.K. and was a massive chart success all around the world. I do hope that there is a lot of celebration around the fortieth anniversary. If some critics felt Gabriel was too commercial and it was following what was popular during that time – rather than being distinct and original -, others noted how Gabriel transformed from being this cult to commercial artist without losing his brilliance and authenticity. After a run of albums more experimental, this was Gabriel making music that was perhaps more accessible but extraordinary. It happened with other artists during the 1980s who were releasing more experimental or less commercial albums then changed. Maybe because of the label, or the feeling that they needed to put something out that would sell more. Gabriel did not compromise or water his music down. The fusion of genres and the production is unlike anything else that was around in 1986 I feel. So still sounds fresh and relevant. Not dated at all. In 2012, Peter Gabriel spoke with Rolling Stone about So. That was a year when he played the album in full on stage:

“Why do you think So managed to reach a much broader audience than your previous albums? 

There was less sort of esoteric songwriting. I think they were simpler songs in some ways, but I think we caught a wave. They were done with passion and we had a really good team working on them. Then, of course, we had things like the “Sledgehammer” video, which helped enormously. It got us a wider audience. Also, the one concession I agreed to was to place an actual photo of myself on the cover rather than the usual obscured stuff I had been doing.

You also gave this one an actual title.

It was named, yeah. That was a reluctant choice. In the old days I would go through my vinyl and identity each record by the picture, not by the title. I always liked that. In some ways, I’m just a visual person. It was the idea to just do away with titles. Give the pictures space to breathe and speak for themselves. But, of course, it caused confusion in the marketplace. The American record company, Geffen, got so fed up with me that they said they weren’t going to release my fourth record unless I gave it some title. So, it was called Security in America and it had no title everywhere else in the world.

When you made So, did you try and make it more accessible, or that was just sort of a natural development?

I think that was a bunch of songs that were there at the time. With “Sledgehammer,” everyone thinks, “Oh, he must have created that to get a hit.” And it wasn’t done that way. In fact, [bassist] Tony Levin reminded me that he was packing his bags to go home, and I called him back into the studio, saying “I’ve got this one idea that maybe we can fool around with for the next record – but I like the feel.” That was “Sledgehammer.” It was late in the day and we just fell into the groove, landed a beautiful drum track on it, a great bass line and it all came together.

I think the video really helped get it to a different audience. I’ve not had many intersections with mass culture, so that was one occasion where that happened.

Did you see “In Your Eyes” as a special song when you made it?

I knew it had some heart in it, and I loved the Youssou N’Dour bit at the end. We should have put out the longer version, but we had to cut it ’cause of time constraints. But it felt so heartfelt and, yeah, I I felt it was a special song, the like of which I hadn’t heard before in the way it integrated the different influences and tried putting together this love lyric, which was, in part, based on this African idea of having an ambiguous love song that can be human love, man to woman, or man to God.

You didn’t release a follow-up to So for six years. Do you think that was a mistake? You sort of lost some momentum there.

I’m sure commercially it wasn’t the smartest thing to do, but I’ve never really worried about that. And to be honest, I think one of the reasons I’m still lucky enough to put out records and have audiences come to shows is cause I haven’t played that game very well. I think that consumer culture tends to be very hungry. It can’t get enough of you for a very short time and then your taste gets boring and they spit you out and take the next new thrill. And so, while it was never a predetermined strategy, I would probably recommend it to artists now if they want a long career. If you got something worth saying, if you’ve got something to put out, don’t worry about what the record company tells you. Take your time”.

In May 2021, Albumism wrote about So on its thirty-fifth anniversary. Even if this album was less experimental than his previous work, there are still styles, sounds and genres mixed together that you were not getting on other albums at the time. Peter Gabriel album to perfectly balance something that can appeal to stations and T.V. and also speak to his existing fanbase:

“Gabriel began recording So with producer Daniel Lanois in 1985 at his home studio. Although the songs were less experimental, he fused African and Brazilian styles with the elements of his art rock past, and the end results were something magical. He managed to perform the difficult task of staying true to his style of music while making the album more listenable to a wider audience.

For better or worse, the popularity of So was buoyed by the release of the album’s first single “Sledgehammer.” It was accompanied by, at the time, a groundbreaking, multiple MTV Award winning music video. “Sledgehammer” was released a month before the album and ironically it was the last song recorded for the album. Gabriel refers to the song as an homage to the music that he grew up with and his all-time favorite singer, Otis Redding. To capture the feel of the late ‘60s Stax recordings, Gabriel used trumpeter Wayne Jackson, member of The Memphis Horns, who toured with Redding. Legend has it that Jackson recorded his trumpet solo in just one take.

Upon hearing “Sledgehammer” for the first time, I was curious about what the rest of the album would sound like. I thought most of the songs would be in a similar vein, but I was pleasantly surprised when I put the needle down on the record and I heard the opening cymbals (courtesy of Stewart Copeland) on “Red Rain.” Who knew that a song about torture, kidnapping, and parting red seas could sound so amazing. Gabriel has stated that the song is also the continuing story of Mozo, a character from his first two albums.

The third track, “Don't Give Up,” is a political statement decrying the rising unemployment that prevailed during Margaret Thatcher’s time as Prime Minister of England. It also has a very interesting story attached to it. When Gabriel wrote the song, his original intent was to have it be a duet with Dolly Parton. When Parton declined, Gabriel turned to his friend Kate Bush, who immediately agreed to sing the song. As much as I would have loved to hear Parton's vocal on the song, Bush's delicate reading creates a undeniable sense of beauty that makes the song work.

The running order for So has regrettably changed over the years. When it was first released, the opening track on side two (or track 5 for you CD owners) is the timeless “In Your Eyes.” The song is also famously featured in the 1989 movie Say Anything and features the iconic image of Lloyd Dobler (played by John Cusack) holding up a boombox while this song is emanating from it. Gabriel has said that he and Cusack "were sort of trapped together in a minuscule moment of contemporary culture." The song is also noteworthy for the powerful singing of Youssou N'Dour.

After 35 years, So has sustained the reputation of a great album that does not sound the least bit dated by 1980s production values. Rolling Stone placed it at #187 in its original list of the 500 greatest albums of all-time and at #14 in the 100 Best Albums of the ‘80s. It catapulted Gabriel into international superstardom. At one time, “Sledgehammer” was the most played music video in the history of MTV, but Gabriel's talent and influence is so much greater than just that video”.

In 2024, PROG told the story of So. Maybe Peter Gabriel felt that he was no longer able to remain where he was in terms of recognition and popularity. Having to make a break towards the mainstream. Rather than selling out, this was an album that he needed to make. One that is widely regarded as one of the best ever. So inventive and timeless. Such a broad range of songs:

“Don’t Give Up is arguably Gabriel’s most powerful statement. In 1981, Margaret Thatcher’s Employment Secretary Norman Tebbit infamously used an analogy about his father being out of work in the 30s, and instead of rioting, he got on his bike and looked for work. This became interpreted popularly as telling the unemployed to ‘get on their bike’ to find a job. Gabriel’s tale of a dispirited man at the end of his tether looking for work touched a raw nerve with millions of listeners in the UK and, latterly, the world. The song, with Gabriel’s despair in the verses and Bush’s words of hope in the chorus, has gone on to be arguably Gabriel’s most loved composition.

After such high drama, That Voice Again is a beautiful, Byrds-like pop song that often gets overlooked amid the album’s plentiful highlights. Originally entitled First Stone, it sounds almost as if Gabriel had taped one of the therapy sessions that he had been going through. Musically, it’s relatively simplistic, with Rhodes playing jangling Rickenbacker over the rhythm section of drummer Manu Katché and bassist Tony Levin.

Mercy Street was another standout. Gabriel had been reading the work of American poet Anne Sexton after having become interested in her work through the book To Bedlam And Part Way Back. Sexton had committed suicide at the age of 45 in 1974, leaving a slender yet highly confessional body of work, and the gentle, lilting rhythm of Gabriel’s song supports lyrics that allude to this. Percussion for the track was recorded by Gabriel in Rio de Janeiro by seasoned player Djalma Correa. With its deeply reflective tone and affecting vocal, Mercy Street became one of Gabriel’s most popular numbers and a staple of his live set.

Big Time was a sardonic reflection on the music business. It takes the opposite viewpoint of the Jacob character in I Know What I Like (In Your Wardrobe); it was time, after all, to try for that future in the fire-escape trade. Gabriel wrote the lyrics examining the dichotomy of his character, and perhaps realising it was fame he craved after all. The track was an obvious choice for a later single from the album in the UK, and the second single in the US, where it reached Number 8. Clean cut and funky, this was clearly how the States liked their Gabriel.

We Do What We’re Told (Milgram’s 37) had been around for a considerable period, originally recorded as far back as 1980’s Melt and seriously in the running for 1982’s Security. As it is, it sounds like the last link with that era. Strange, undercooked and difficult, it was about Professor Stanley Milgram’s social psychology experiment from 1961: volunteers assessing how far they would be prepared to follow an authority figure, even if it was in complete opposition to their conscience or their views. Gabriel explored how people are conditioned to believe in dictators and support war. With its patter of Jerry Marotta’s processed drums and L Shankar’s squalls of violin, and two overdubbed guitar tracks by Rhodes, it’s a disquieting interlude, proving to Gabriel’s new-found audience that it was still within his power to unsettle.

This Is The Picture (Excellent Birds) was adapted from the track Gabriel had written with Laurie Anderson for her Mister Heartbreak album. On it, he worked again with Nile Rodgers.

“I recorded my part in New York,” Rodgers recalled. “In those days I was gigging, and that was the height of my life. Sometimes it’s hard for me to remember what studio, what work, where I was. I loved that sound that Daniel got.”

What Gabriel wanted Rodgers to do was to add his remarkable, rhythmical guitar playing to another skeletal idea, and one that had been inspired by the Korean video artist Nam June Paik, who used to make TV shows. He had asked Laurie Anderson and Peter Gabriel if they would like to collaborate, and they worked quickly to produce this groove.

The album closed with another of Gabriel’s most loved songs, In Your Eyes, originally titled Sagrada Familia, inspired by the cathedral in Barcelona. Alluding to Antoni Gaudí and rifle heiress Sarah Winchester, the song was multi-layered and deeply affecting. The power of the track was made real by the stunning guest vocal performance from Youssou N’Dour, who sings in his native language, Ouoloff. In Your Eyes was featured dramatically in the Cameron Crowe film Say Anything in a sequence when protagonist Lloyd Dobler (John Cusack) plays it loudly from a ghetto blaster.

So was released on May 19, 1986. Sledgehammer was issued shortly before it and put Gabriel squarely into the charts and hearts of millions. With its Brothers Quay/Aardman Animation video, Gabriel showed that, after all, he was a song and dance man. Here was the flower-headed pipecleaner of Willow Farm, vamping it up for the MTV generation.

The video was a viral sensation long before such things existed. The single reached the top spot in the US. Gabriel was delighted. The most affectionate homage to the music that originated from deep within America, here was almost the ultimate tribute. An introverted white boy from a privileged British background convincingly interpreting the music of the impoverished, segregated south of America. And somehow, it not only worked, but absolutely nailed it.

So, just funky enough, just obscure enough, just nostalgic enough, fitted perfectly with the CD generation. Gabriel began to attract a breed of listener that welcomed him as a ‘new artist’. This was liberating but would ultimately prove constraining. Although a super-slick short single had always been part of Gabriel’s oeuvre, how willing would this new audience be when he was experimenting?”

I am going to finish with a review from So from AllMusic. There was quite a shift in mood from 1982’s Peter Gabriel (Peter Gabriel 4: Security). As it turns forty on 19th May, I know there will be some fresh features and reviews around So. You hear songs from So played widely to this day:

“Peter Gabriel introduced his fifth studio album, So, with "Sledgehammer," an Otis Redding-inspired soul-pop raver that was easily his catchiest, happiest single to date. Needless to say, it was also his most accessible, and, in that sense it was a good introduction to So, the catchiest, happiest record he ever cut. "Sledgehammer" propelled the record toward blockbuster status, and Gabriel had enough songs with single potential to keep it there. There was "Big Time," another colorful dance number; "Don't Give Up," a moving duet with Kate Bush; "Red Rain," a stately anthem popular on album rock radio; and "In Your Eyes," Gabriel's greatest love song, which achieved genuine classic status after being featured in Cameron Crowe's classic Say Anything. These all illustrated the strengths of the album: Gabriel's increased melodicism and ability to blend African music, jangly pop, and soul into his moody art rock. Apart from these singles, plus the urgent "That Voice Again," the rest of the record is as quiet as the album tracks of Security. The difference is, the singles on that record were part of the overall fabric; here, the singles are the fabric, which can make the album seem top-heavy (a fault of many blockbuster albums, particularly those of the mid-'80s). Even so, those songs are so strong, finding Gabriel in a newfound confidence and accessibility, that it's hard not to be won over by them, even if So doesn't develop the unity of its two predecessors”.

Such a phenomenal album that created this huge success for Peter Gabriel, he followed So with 1992’s As. Whilst not as acclaimed as So, it was another terrific album from Peter Gabriel. That gap of six year between albums. After the huge success of So, one might have thought he would follow it up more quickly. However, that does not take away from what he created with So. It has been great exploring…

A classic album.

FEATURE: The Rock & Roll Hall of Fame 2026: Celebrating the Nominees

FEATURE:

 

 

The Rock & Roll Hall of Fame 2026

IN THIS PHOTO: Ms. Lauryn Hill

Celebrating the Nominees

__________

IF some are not…

IN THIS PHOTO: Shakira

are not huge fans of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame and what it stands for, I do think that it important and exciting to see artists inducted. Celebrating those who have made a huge contribution to music, an artist is eligible twenty-five years after they release their first record. You can see this year’s nominees here. It is a typically broad and strong list. I would especially love Jeff Buckley and Ms. Lauryn Hill to be among the inductees. The BBC published an article reacting to the nominees:

“Phil Collins, Oasis, Pink and Shakira are among the stars who have been nominated for inclusion in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame this year.

The 17 artists who could be admitted to the prestigious US-based institution also range from Jeff Buckley and Lauryn Hill to Mariah Carey and Wu-Tang Clan.

Artists or bands become eligible 25 years after releasing their first commercial recording.

Oasis and Carey have been nominated twice before, while Pink is now eligible, 26 years after her debut single, and Colombian superstar Shakira could become one of only a handful of musicians from Latin America to have ever been admitted.

Last year, the Miami Herald reported, external that just three out of more than 1,000 individual inductees were born in Latin America.

The Wu-Tang Clan are the only hip-hop act to be nominated

Wu-Tang Clan's nomination comes after Gene Simmons from veteran rock band Kiss recently criticised the inclusion of hip-hop artists, saying they don't "belong", external in the Hall of Fame.

First-time nominees:

• Jeff Buckley

• Phil Collins

• Melissa Etheridge

• Lauryn Hill

• INXS

• New Edition

• Pink

• Shakira

• Luther Vandross

• Wu-Tang Clan

Returning nominees:

• The Black Crowes

• Mariah Carey

• Billy Idol

• Iron Maiden

• Joy Division/New Order

• Oasis

• Sade

Collins, 75, entered as a member of Genesis in 2010, and has now been shortlisted for his solo work including 1980s hits In the Air Tonight, Against All Odds (Take A Look At Me Now) and Easy Lover.

He would be a popular choice after his music has been discovered by a new generation, and after he has suffered a series of health problems in recent years.

Phil Collins performed seated on his last tour, and recently revealed he has a 24-hour live-in nurse

He recently told Zoe Ball on BBC Radio 2 podcast Eras that "everything that could go wrong with me did go wrong", adding: "I have a 24-hour live-in nurse to make sure I take my medication as I should do."

He explained: "I got Covid in hospital, my kidneys started to back up, everything that could all seemed to sort of converge at the same time. And I had five operations on my knee."

Collins, the father of Emily in Paris star Lily, also said he would "love" to tour again but wasn't sure he wanted to "go as far as to launch that boat".

His last major solo tour was the Not Dead Yet Tour from 2017 to 2019, and he performed seated during the Genesis reunion world tour in 2021 and 2022.

He also told Ball he may go back into the recording studio to work on "some things that are half-formed or were never finished".

Meanwhile, Oasis will discover whether their successful reunion over the past year has enhanced their reputation as legends in the US, a country they famously struggled to fully break first time around.

But singer Liam Gallagher has repeatedly criticised the Hall of Fame, previously saying he wasn't interested in receiving an award from "some geriatric in a cowboy hat".

He added, perhaps sarcastically, that Oasis didn't deserve their nomination "as much as Mariah [Carey]".

"She smashed it," he noted.

Mariah Carey has been nominated for the past three years - could it be third time lucky?

Carey, meanwhile, has previously noted that "my lawyer got into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame before me," referencing entertainment lawyer Allen Grubman - who also represented clients like Madonna, Bruce Springsteen and Lady Gaga.

There's strong British representation on this year's list - Billy Idol, Iron Maiden, Joy Division/New Order and Sade are all up for induction at the second or third attempts.

Sade last toured and released an album 15 years ago

A panel of voters normally chooses between six and eight performers to be inducted from the nominations.

The selected acts will be revealed in April, and the star-studded induction ceremony will take place in Cleveland, Ohio, in the autumn”.

To celebrate the incredible artists who have been nominated for induction and inclusion into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, I have compiled a playlist of their work. Two songs from each artist. There is going to be a lot of interest around those who are selected for induction in April. I think that it is an amazing rundown of artists who are all very worthy. Here is a mixtape celebrating the remarkable…

ROCK & Roll Hall of Fame nominees.

FEATURE: And Let Me Guide You to the Purple Rain: Remembering the Iconic Prince

FEATURE:

 

 

And Let Me Guide You to the Purple Rain

PHOTO CREDIT: Everett Collection/Bridgeman Images

Remembering the Iconic Prince

__________

YOU get these artists who…

PHOTO CREDIT: Everett Collection/Bridgeman Images

have a body of music that lasts through times and will inspire and influence the odd person here and there. They have quite a large legacy, maybe. Others that spread into other areas of culture. There are a rare few artists who have inspired so many generations and areas of culture. Madonna is one. David Bowie, The Beatles. Objectively, Kate Bush too. Prince is someone who has gone down in the history books. A true icon whose music will always be loved and never forgotten. On 21st April, 2016, we received the devastating news that Prince died. Aged only fifty-seven, it was a premature and shocking death that was so hard to process. It is almost ten years since the death of Prince. I am going to write another feature or two prior to that anniversary. I will start out more general here and compile a Prince mix. I want to first get to an article from Esquire published in April 2021 that reflects on this music protegee. It is a fascinating piece about how “The Purple One's late-career protégées reflect on the lives and art he still inspires five years after his death”:

“So much of today’s music was shaped by these relationships he cultivated. From Alicia Keys to D’Angelo to Janelle Monáe, most of R&B’s biggest stars in recent decades were summoned to Paisley Park at some point. A then-unknown Lizzo appeared on Prince’s 2014 album Plectrumelectrum, and before he passed, he had offered to produce her next album. Kendrick Lamar was flown in to join Prince onstage in 2014, and the pair met in the studio for the rapper’s 2015 album, To Pimp a Butterfly, but ran out of time before they could record anything .

Prince approached musicians who caught his attention whenever, wherever. Pop star Rita Ora got a phone call from him at her London office, out of the blue in 2014. He found Donna Grantis—who became the guitarist in his band 3rdEYEGIRL—from a YouTube video. Soul/jazz singer Kandace Springs had been trying to contact him for a few years when he retweeted one of her recordings and then slid into her DMs.

“It was important for him to feel like he was a part of what was going on, to get different perspectives,” says La Havas. “It gave him energy to know what other people were doing and to make connections and new friends and jam with other musicians.”

But in addition to gaining insight into fresh approaches and attitudes, Prince also knew what he had to offer to these new kids. “He found a lot of fulfillment in bringing people together and helping young musicians develop their sound,” says Ora, who remembers “musicians everywhere” when he brought her to his headquarters in Chanhassen, Minnesota. “He had so much passion for music and was really invested in the growth and evolution of younger artists.”

Given his stature, Prince obviously didn’t need to open his ears—and his studio—to artists who were on the rise. Most pop stars tend to turn competitive when the next generation starts to threaten their dominance. But for him, that drive manifested in wanting to keep up on any interesting voices entering his musical territory, and then helping to cultivate their potential, creating a future for the organic, R&B-based sounds he loved.

These protégées all point to certain concepts that he emphasized, mostly having to do with independence and individuality. “He would always stress not to cover up my voice,” says Springs, “to use live instruments, even to mix my own music at the shows. Do everything you can yourself if you can. Push yourself, learn, don’t be afraid—that’s what he was best at.”

Grantis recalls a session in which Prince asked her to record a guitar solo. Thinking it was a pretty big deal, she asked if she could work out some ideas and tackle it the next day. He heard her out and said, “OK—do it now and let me know when you have it,” and then left to play ping-pong with her husband. “That moment speaks to Prince’s ability to bring out the best in all of us, challenge us musically and push us to reach our full potential.”

These women all recount fun moments with Prince—playing checkers, tweeting jokes, having “giggly” phone calls—and staying in touch with him on a regular basis for years. Springs’s last email exchange with him came just two days before his 2016 death; “I remember seeing that he was struggling at the time and asking if he was OK, and he said ‘I’m fine, miss you’.” She recalled performing as a guest at a Paisley Park show marking the thirtieth anniversary of Purple Rain, after which they ran offstage, jumped on bicycles, and rode around the parking lot as the audience got in their cars to go home.

Five years later, his wisdom continues to reveal itself. “Prince would often teach us things, or encourage us to explore certain topics, by asking questions,” says Grantis. “On a couple of occasions he asked, ‘What if we could use music to teach people?’ Although it sounded intriguing, I didn’t fully connect with the possibilities of what it meant at the time. Now, what has become clear to me is that capturing someone’s attention—whether it’s during a three-minute song, or a three-hour performance—is such a privilege. It’s an opportunity for ideas to be shared.”

La Havas, who describes Prince less as a mentor than as a “dear friend who had very valuable advice and cared enough to communicate that,” notes that our current world makes his example shine even brighter. “He was so productive—that’s what’s really sticking with me in this time we’re living in, COVID times,” she says. “He made music on his own, in his own space, 24 hours a day, and that really resonates with how I am now, knowing that I can’t really go to the studio and collaborate with people”.

Even though we mark ten years of Prince’s passing on 21st and it will be very sad, we also will share celebration. In terms of his legacy and staggering body of work. His brilliance and how he changed lives. An artist that will be remembered forever and whose music will continue to influence artists, below is just a portion of the genius that Prince left us. Ten years after his death and there remains…

NOBODY like him.

FEATURE: Pray You Catch Me: Beyoncé's Lemonade at Ten

FEATURE:

Pray You Catch Me

Beyoncé's Lemonade at Ten

__________

IT is not an exaggeration to say…

that Lemonade is one of the greatest albums of all time. Beyoncé's sixth studio album is one of the most Grammy-nominated albums in history, Lemonade won Best Urban Contemporary Album and Best Music Video at the 59th Grammy Awards. It also won a Peabody Award in Entertainment at the 76th Annual Peabody Awards and received four nominations at the 68th Primetime Emmy Awards. A number one album around the world (including in the U.S.), it turns ten on 23rd April. I am going to end with some reviews for Lemonade, as it is also one of the most important and powerful albums of the past decade. Imperious, seismic and utterly beguiling, I do wonder how others will approach Lemonade a decade after its release. I am going to start out with an interview from ELLE by Melissa Harris-Perry. A look at the symbolism, power and pain of Lemonade. “The call-and-response tradition is so deeply embedded in black cultural practice, so to help understand the meaning of this moment I sent out a call of my own to writers and thinkers who centre black women and girls in their work”:

“I think it's some of Beyoncé's best work—it's honest and open, and much of it is beautiful (especially the piano ballad "Sand Castles." But if I have to pick a favorite, it would be a tie between "Hold up" and "Don't Hurt Yourself," the song with Jack White. I have to admit I'm a fan of Angry Beyoncé, liberating herself and giving people hell. I also love that she weaved reggae and funk/rock riffs into those songs, and tried other innovative things on the album, including a really good country song in "Daddy Lessons."

—Joy Ann Reid is MSNBC national correspondent and author

I'm glad she continued to tell her story from her own point of view. She created a whole album talking about what SHE wanted to talk about. Love, infidelity, intuition, anger, rage, redemption, black women's lives and losses. And none of this looks like a get the Coin 101. She looks like an artist willing to lose some fans to say what is really on her mind. It looks like an artist having her say and making it plain. Folks always want to say that Beyoncé isn't smart, but this is smart. She's given us weeks worth of material to think about. And as the co-chair of the academic wing of the Beyhive, I'm thankful. This is boss stuff right here.

—Blair LM Kelley is Associate Professor of History at N.C. State University

I was most struck by the images in several sections of the visual album of black women and girls, of all hues and dazzling hair textures and shades, in period clothing evoking antebellum Louisiana but infusing it with modern girl power. Those images were so visually rich, because they are so divorced from modernity, but the women themselves were thoroughly modern in their obvious strength and attitude. I also loved the way the gorgeous water sequences in the "Denial" section that erupts into a frenzy of jubilant, bat-wielding destruction in "Hold up." And of course the women with faces painted in a send-up to Yoruba culture adds to the notion of that inextricable link between Africa and the American slave narrative.

—Joy Ann Reid, MSNBC national correspondent and author

Beyoncé is centering the South and also connecting this to the Black global South. She is unapologetic in her Blackness, her woman-ness, and her Southerness. Lemonade is an archive of Black womanhood/girlhood honed in the South. The South emerges as the past, present, and future of Black womanhood. The visual album rejects the holding of the South as solely a place trapped in history. The project asserts a complex, variegated, and infinitely generative space of Black kinship, creativity, resistance, and freedom dreams. This is incredibly valuable intervention, as it contributes to a tradition of southern Black women writers, artists, performers, and mothers/aunties/grandmothers/godmothers sustaining families and our communities through their creative genius and unbound imagination.

—Treva B. Lindsey is Assistant Professor of Women's, Gender, & Sexuality Studies at The Ohio State University

What I love and will continue to love about Beyoncé is that she has always pulled from her southern Black culture. Even when others weren't aware of what she was pulling from music (New Orleans bounce, screw, and certain kinds of flow) or just choreography or even aesthetic (B'Day era), she's very much a southern Black girl and keeps all of those mores and customs out front. I find it valuable in that there's no one on her level who has managed to include so much of that culture in their work and have this kind of global appeal.

—Michael Arceneaux is a columnist at Complex”.

I am going to move to The New Yorker and their take on the globe-conquering Lemonade. A defiance of spirit and one of the most remarkable and powerful albums ever released, I feel like it is still resonating and creating shockwaves today. In terms of its legacy, it remains hugely important and relevant. Many argue that Lemonade is Beyoncé’s finest statement:

“But while the album is Beyoncé’s most naked and personal yet, “Lemonade” is also a collage of collaborative artistic effort. Even more so than her last record, she draws from every corner of popular music, new and old, to make a rich potpourri of songs. She also combines sounds and imagery from many eras to salute black life, invoking the antebellum South, Malcolm X, and the young victims of police brutality over the last three years. But, while the material is heavy, the production is often feather-light. Among her collaborators here are Diplo, the Weeknd; Ezra Koenig, of Vampire Weekend; Jack White, The-Dream, Animal Collective, James Blake, Kendrick Lamar, and the Yeah Yeah Yeahs. She samples Soulja Boy and Led Zeppelin; she sings the blues. In the past, Beyoncé has sparked controversy by lifting images and ideas from other pieces of art; when the Internet takes its collective close read in the coming days, “Lemonade” will certainly generate more. Once again, she has compiled a long list of video directors to help execute the project, in addition to recruiting a number of actresses and friends to appear in the video (none of whom distract from the star for a moment). One cameo is made by Serena Williams, who appears during a fierce celebration of a song, “Sorry,” on which Beyoncé sings, “Me and my ladies sip my D’USSÉ cup / I don’t give a fuck / Chucking my deuces up / Suck on my balls / Pause / I had enough.” Beyoncé, the only woman on Earth who can rebuff her husband with a smirking reference to his own brand of cognac.

Although Beyoncé has called on a diverse group of collaborators, her younger sister Solange is notably absent from “Lemonade.” This is a curious fact, given that Solange is responsible for the most damning mark on Beyoncé and Jay Z’s public record. In 2014, she was captured by surveillance film in an elevator after the Met Gala unleashing a mysterious fit of violence at Jay Z. The footage is chilling not only because Solange is so physically explosive—kicking, punching, clawing, screaming, and resisting a bodyguard—but because Beyoncé stands by and watches the whole scene, eerily placid. Solange may not appear on “Lemonade” but her spirit looms large. Some collaborators are Solange’s friends; some of the footage was shot in New Orleans, where Solange moved, in 2013. There are shots of a group of solemn black women dressed in fanciful white dresses, calling to mind the photographs taken at Solange’s wedding. Most crucially, the project channels the rage that was on the display in the elevator that night, the footage that prompted the world to speculate about the state of Beyoncé and Jay Z’s marriage—and presumably caused Beyoncé to go into a self-imposed partial media exile for years. Last night, Beyoncé finally responded to the questions that went unanswered after that night. She seems to be saying: Yes, Solange had good reason to unleash herself on my husband like that. She did not explode in vain.

And yet “Lemonade” is not so simple as a tale of a woman scorned. At some point the project turns away from Jay Z and toward the broken marriage between Beyoncé’s parents, making you wonder whether she was talking about her mother and father the whole time. She builds a striking image of marital strife as familial heritage, refers to her father’s arms around her mother’s neck, and presents footage of both herself and her daughter, Blue Ivy, with her father, Matthew Knowles. “My daddy warned me about men like you,” she says, drawing a complicated line of pain and distrust that bridges generations.

As the project unfurls, you cannot help but wait for the tone to shift from despair to hope. And, because she is Beyoncé, whose perfectionism extends to the bonds of her personal life, it does. Jay Z, the subject of so much spite and fury, enters the frame about two-thirds into the project. We see the back of his neck, his hands stroking Beyoncé’s bare calf, he and his wife in a cautiously loving embrace. The project shifts quickly toward redemption; there is a heavy-handed image of a baptism, along with footage of Jay Z and Beyoncé getting matching tattoos on their fingers. “My torturer became my remedy,” she says, “so we’re gonna heal.” This moment is designed to signal relief. But there is a spirit of defeat here—love and hope cannot hold a candle to what she has shown us with her pain. There is a sense that Beyoncé is yet again pulling the curtain closed after letting us see so much. Healing means retreating back into herself, her soul made elusive once again”.

Before getting to a critical review, I want to move to Medium and their feature about Lemonade. They write how the 2016 album is “A Celebratory Reflection on Beyoncé’s Impactful Album on Black Women’s Healing”. I first heard the album when it came out and was instantly struck by it:

“Throughout the album’s visuals, Beyoncé adorns Black women in Southern gothic Antebellum attire of the 1800s and Yoruba traditional face paint and imagery. Setting the film in the south, particularly in Madewood Plantation House in Louisiana (a former sugarcane plantation), Beyoncé reimagines these spaces as sanctuaries for Black women to exist and live in harmony. She creates a world that centers Black women and our stories being placed at the forefront of history, including notable pop culture figures like Zendaya, Chloe x Halle, and Ibeyi, as well as the mothers of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Eric Garner, whose sons were victims of police brutality. Beyoncé gives a voice to the Black women who bear the brunt of the injustice that plagues black people in America every day, while simultaneously making clear that the album is for black women from all walks of life.

Lemonade remains heartbreak’s most enthralling album because it encourages us to return to love even if it has hurt us in the past. Her message contradicts what has overly infiltrated today’s society: messages that encourage hate, resentment, and bitterness as a response when one has experienced heartbreak, betrayal, pain, and loss. Lemonade is a reminder that there is no shame in choosing love every time because “true love never has to hide.” In her Grammy speech, Beyoncé said, “We all experience pain and loss, and often we become inaudible. My intention for the film and album was to create a body of work that would give a voice to our pain, our struggles, our darkness, and our history. To confront issues that make us uncomfortable.” Further saying that “I feel it’s vital that we learn from the past and recognise our tendencies to repeat our mistakes.” This album sheds light on the complexities of Black people’s interpersonal relationships, highlighting that our history of racial trauma is something that can not be easily separated from us. This lesson is especially poignant coming from a figure like Beyoncé — someone understood by the public to “have it all.” Yet even with her “having it all,” it can never separate her from the effects and experiences of her parents, grandparents, and their grandparents.

The title, Lemonade, is about how we heal. We are the healers and the alchemists: turning something sour into something sweet, turning loss into healing and reconciliation. The album pushes us to question ourselves and say, how do we heal ourselves?

It would be a grave mistake to only think of this album as a confessional tale of infidelity. With the lens of an intersectional feminist, Lemonade is an album about working in community with other Black women, healing, reconciliation, and owning one’s heritage. As previously stated, the album serves as a reminder that the personal cannot be separated from the political. Reflecting on this, I recall the remarks of author and scholar Naila Keleta-Mae from the University of Waterloo–she stated that Lemonade is an album that displays the work of a seasoned artist, one who is thinking about her musical legacy. Lemonade is a radical album because it is an album for Black women by a Black woman–and pop stars don’t make music for Black women”.

I will end with Pitchfork and their review of Lemonade. Turning ten on 23rd April, this is an album that everyone needs to listen to. Following 2013’s Beyoncé, this was another step up in her career. An album that arrived at a time when U.S. politics was shifting. A year when Donald Trump became President and there was racial tension, police violence and abuse across the country, Lemonade made an impact and resonated. An album that also addresses Black womanhood, intergenerational trauma, and forgiveness, this masterpiece will be discussed decades from now:

“If you’ve ever been cheated on by someone who thought you’d be too stupid or naive to notice, you will find the first half of Lemonade incredibly satisfying. If you have ears and love brilliant production and hooks that stick, you'll likely arrive at the same conclusion. The run from “Hold Up” to “6 Inch” contains some of Beyoncé’s strongest work—ever, period—and a bit of that has to do with her clap-back prowess. The increasingly signature cadence, patois, and all-around attitude on Lemonade speaks to her status as the hip-hop pop star—but this being Bey, she doesn’t stop there. Via the album’s highly specific samples and features by artists like Jack White and James Blake, Lemonade proves Beyoncé to also be a new kind of post-genre pop star. (Let us remember a time, not very long ago, when Bey and Jay attending a Grizzly Bear show with Solange made headlines.)

Both of these attributes—a methodical rapper’s flow, an open-eared listener’s frame of reference—meet on the slowed-down stunner “Hold Up,” where Beyoncé borrows an iconic Karen O turn of phrase via Ezra Koenig, a touch of Jamaican flavor via Diplo (again), and a plucky Andy Williams sample to fight for her man while chiding him for doing this to her (!), of all people. From there, Bey’s just like, “fuck it—big mistake, huge” and gets (Tidal co-owner) Jack White to join her in dueting over a psychedelic soul jam and a Zeppelin sample as she scowls, “Watch my fat ass twist, boy, as I bounce to the next dick, boy.” As she accuses her husband of not being man enough to handle all of her multitudes, fury frays her voice. Even on an album stacked with some of Beyoncé’s best recorded vocal performances to date, “Don’t Hurt Yourself” has her belting to a whole other dimension—specifically, that of Janis Joplin and late-’60s Tina Turner. This won’t be the last time Bey dips into the classic vinyl on Lemonade, either: see “Freedom,” which manages to both: A) speak poignantly to Civil Rights as much as personal plight, B) sound like an Adidas commercial; this means it’s the logical choice for next single, assuming Beyoncé is still releasing those.

Bey’s genre-hopping doesn’t always sound quite as transcendent as “Don’t Hurt Yourself,” however. Though certainly memorable (not least because it finds her name-checking the Second Amendment), “Daddy Lessons”—where a country guitar-line meets New Orleans brass in service of her Southern roots—is the least interesting chapter sonically, though the parallels it draws between Jay-Z and Beyoncé’s own cheating father still make it crucial in the context of Lemonade’s narrative. It’s hard to see how Beyoncé could have done without any of these scenes to tell the story (not even “Formation” in the end-credits), and though the specific sounds may not be as forward-thinking as those of her 2013 self-titled, there are clear reasons for every musical treatment she has made here. Lemonade is a stunning album, one that sees her exploring sounds she never has before. It also voices a rarely seen concept, that of the album-length ode to infidelity. Even stranger, it doesn’t double as an album-length ode to breaking up.

Yes, after Beyoncé makes nearly half an album’s worth of glorious rage songs directed at an unfaithful partner, she gives it a little time and remembers that she was raised to value hard work and spirituality. And so, she can’t give up on her marriage, the same one she spent her last two albums (mostly) celebrating. Beyoncé even kind of sells it, surmising with a tear-inducing sincerity on relaxed-fit soul jam “All Night” that “nothing real can be threatened.” It’s an easy platitude to make, but it’s also an extremely Beyoncé way of looking at things. For a perfectionist who controls her image meticulously, Beyoncé is obsessed with the notion of realness. That’s the biggest selling point of an album like Lemonade, but there’s a quality to it that also invites skepticism: That desire to basically art-direct your own sobbing self-portrait to make sure your mascara smears in the most perfectly disheveled way. But who cares what’s “real” when the music delivers a truth you can use”.

An album that celebrates ten years on 23rd April, Lemonade is one of the most astonishing albums ever released. I do wonder whether Beyoncé will mark it or she will have anything to say about Lemonade. It is a stunning release from one of music’s greats. A timeless masterpiece from a music queen, Lemonade is one of the most astonishing albums…

WE have ever heard.

FEATURE: Groovelines: Thin Lizzy - The Boys Are Back in Town

FEATURE:

 

 

Groovelines

Thin Lizzy - The Boys Are Back in Town

__________

A true classic…

IN THIS PHOTO: Thin Lizzy (Phil Lynott, Scott Gorham, Brian Downey and Brian Robertson) at Dragonara Hotel, Bristol in 1976/PHOTO CREDIT: Erica Echenberg/Redferns

was released on 17th April, 1976. Thin Lizzy’s The Boys Are Back in Town reached the U.S. Billboard Hot 100 on 15th May, 1976. It is one of these staples that you hear played widely to this day. Ahead of its fiftieth anniversary, I want to look inside this anthem. One that I was not fully aware of the story behind. I am going to come to some features around the track. I am going to start with this feature from Produce Like a Pro. They included The Boys Are Back in Town as one of the Songs That Changed Music:

“Irish hard rockers Thin Lizzy formed in Dublin in 1969. Drummer Brian Downey and bassist/lead vocalist Phil Lynott met while still in school, long before they ever dreamed of being legendary rock icons. As the group’s de-facto leader, Lynott wrote most of the band’s material over the course of 12 studio albums between 1971 and 1983. Thin Lizzy’s first projects were rooted in blues and Celtic folk, with little indication of the heavier rock sound they’d infuse later on.

The band performed their first gig at a school hall near the Dublin Airport in February 1970. By the end of the year they’d signed to Decca Records and gone to London to record their self-titled debut LP. The album was only a modest seller and failed to chart in the UK. Unfortunately this trend continued over the course of the first four albums, even with a successful single in 1972: “Whiskey in the Jar” was Thin Lizzy’s take on a traditional Irish ballad, which Decca released against the band’s will. Despite this, it reached #1 in Ireland and #6 overall on the UK charts.

Thin Lizzy finally had a charting album with their fifth project, called Fighting, in 1975. It reached #60 in the UK, though the band continuously struggled to find any sort of commercial success. Still, however, they did well on the road, touring the US for the first time as support for Bob Seger and Bachman-Turner Overdrive.

In 1976, Thin Lizzy recorded Jailbreak, which proved to be the breakthrough they’d been hoping for. “The Boys Are Back in Town” was a worldwide hit and helped fully define the band’s hard rocking, twin-guitar sound. Shortly after the album’s release, Thin Lizzy toured the US again with Aerosmith, Rush, and REO Speedwagon. This helped solidify their status in the brand new market they’d just broken into.

“The Boys Are Back in Town” is easily one of the greatest hard rock hits of all-time. Apart from its immediate commercial success and what it did for the band, the song would forge Thin Lizzy’s legacy as a progenitor of heavy metal, with bands like Metallica, Alice in Chains, Mastodon, and Testament all citing Thin Lizzy as a primary influence”.

Published in 2020, Classic Rock talked about a song that might never had been recorded, were it not for American D.J.s picking up on it and Thin Lizzy’s manager having an ear for a good track. The first single from the Irish band’s seventh studio album, Jailbreak, The Boys Are Back in Town was a big chart success and is seen as one of the best songs ever released. Jailbreak turns fifty on 26th March:

“It may be difficult to believe, but Thin Lizzy came very close to dumping what went on to be arguably the most iconic song of their career.

“We had demoed about fifteen tracks for what became the Jailbreak album, and we’d selected those we felt were the ten best ones,” explains guitarist Scott Gorham. “Then our co-manager Chris O’Donnell came down to listen to the songs, and we played him all fifteen. He picked up on something we’d titled GI Joe, but we had already rejected it as not good enough for the album.

"He liked it, and told us that we should include it. We accepted his judgement, but there was still work to be done, because the lyrics were anti-war, which wasn’t really right for us, and musically it wasn’t there. However, we sorted it all out, and GI Joe turned into The Boys Are Back In Town.”

Gorham remembers vividly when he first heard the idea that would turn into this seminal track: “I was at Phil Lynott’s house, and we were in his living room, going over songs we’d been working on for the album. At the end of the sessions, Phil played me this bass line and asked what I thought of it. He then started to scat sing some lyrical notions he had in his head. From there we fleshed out a verse and a chorus.

“It was just Phil and me involved. But the next day at a band rehearsal, all four of us – including Brian Robertson and Brian Downey – played through the skeleton of the track. Brian Downey did this shuffle on the drums, and that’s when things began to take shape. Because I got the idea from him for what became the guitar harmony you hear now. We had an eight-track recorder in the rehearsal room, which was used to demo songs, and that’s when we did the version of GI Joe which our manager heard and liked.”

However, the song still wasn’t fully realised when Lizzy went into Ramport Studios in South London during late 1975 to record the Jailbreak album with producer John Alcock. “No, it wasn’t a complete track even by this time,” Gorham recalls. “We actually still didn’t have the title. But then one day. Phil came into the studio and said he wanted to call the song The Boys Are Back Town.

"He also had the lyrics written, and I read through them, thinking: ‘Hey, now this is fucking cool!’ Brian Robertson and I then got the guitar harmonies finished to our satisfaction. Although the guitar part in the middle of the song that helped to make it work so well came from Phil. He played it on the bass, and then Brian and I adapted it to the guitar.

“I have to say that recording this track was a pretty quick process. It wasn’t easy, but nor was it too hard.”

There was no belief from the band, though, that what they had was the game changer it would soon become. “To us, this was a decent album track, no more. We certainly did not think it could be a single!”

What happened next was a happy accident, as the finished The Boys Are Back In Town took on a life of its own. “We were out in America touring in 1976. We had no fan base there, and had achieved no success at all. But two radio DJs in Louisville, Kentucky heard the Jailbreak album and began to play it on air. They especially loved The Boys Are Back In Town, and gave it multiple spins every day.

"People then began phoning the station, requesting the song. Then other radio stations picked up on it and also gave it a lot of exposure. Suddenly it was everywhere. The States, it seemed, had fallen in love with this tune”.

Finishing with this feature about a single that was released when the Jailbreak album was successful and climbing the charts. It was a really big and successful time for Thin Lizzy. I wonder how others will mark fifty years of The Boys Are Back in Town:

“In the memorable year of 1976 for Thin Lizzy, one of the many highlights was their American chart debut. In May of that year, they embarked on a US tour supporting Bachman-Turner Overdrive that, by all accounts, wowed audiences everywhere. With the Jailbreak album already climbing the charts on both sides of the Atlantic, the May 15 edition of Billboard had more good news, as “The Boys Are Back In Town” entered the Hot 100.

The vivid story song thus made the American bestsellers two weeks before it even hit the UK charts, on its way to becoming one of the most-loved rock hits of the year. Its American breakout started on KSAN in San Francisco, after which airplay spread coast to coast. But Lizzy’s opportunity to maximise their impact there was scuppered when Phil Lynott contracted hepatitis. That forced the cancellation of another crucial tour supporting Ritchie Blackmore’s Rainbow.

“To tell you the truth, we weren’t initially going to put ‘The Boys Are Back In Town’ on the Jailbreak album at all,” guitarist Scott Gorham later confessed. “Back then you picked ten songs and went with those, because of the time restrictions of vinyl.

The hit they nearly missed

“We recorded 15 songs, and of the ten we picked, that wasn’t one of them,” Gorham went on. “But then the management heard it and said, ‘No, there’s something really good about this song.’ Although back then, it didn’t yet have the twin guitar parts on it.”

“The Boys” reached No.8 in Britain in early July. In the US, where the Hot 100 traditionally moved more slowly, the track eventually landed at No.12 later that month. It was Thin Lizzy’s first US singles chart appearance and their only major single there. “Cowboy Song,” which reached No.77 a few months later, would be their only other showing.

Nevertheless, “The Boys Are Back In Town” helped Jailbreak to become a substantial American success in its own right. It reached No.18 in a 28-week run and was certified gold, their only RIAA recognition in the US. Back in the UK, the album was on the chart for almost a year”.

Apologies for repeating any information when it comes to the story of Thin Lizzy’s The Boys Are Back in Town and its legacy. Released on 17th April, 1976, this is a track that has been passed down the generations. One that you can play and sing the words too. It is such a catchy and instantly memorable song, it is no surprise it has endured and remains as popular now as arguably it ever was. It is clear that The Boys Are Back in Town is one of the greatest songs…

WE have ever seen.

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Al Green at Eighty

FEATURE:

 

 

The Digital Mixtape

Al Green at Eighty

__________

ONE of the greatest…

PHOTO CREDIT: Michael Ochs Archives

voices ever in music history turns eighty on 15th April. I wanted to use that opportunity highlight the brilliant work of Al Green. A hugely prolific artist, he released his debut album, Back Up Train, in 1967. His new E.P., To Love Somebody, arrived in January. His first new music since 2008. He is one of the most influential and revered artists. Seen as one of the last great Soul voices and one of the best the gene has ever seen, Al Green has won eleven Grammy Awards, including the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award. He has also received the BMI Icon award and is a Kennedy Center Honors recipient. Before getting to a playlist featuring some of his best work, I want to bring in some biography from AllMusic:

“A preeminent R&B singer, Al Green specializes in a smooth soul that has found common ground between the carnal and the spiritual. Green's sensual falsetto found its match in the tight, immaculate Memphis funk shepherded by Willie Mitchell, the head of Hi Records who signed the Grand Rapids, Michigan singer after "Back Up Train" broke out of its regional hit status in 1967. With Mitchell behind the boards, Green released a series of albums that showcased how he developed into an exceptional interpreter of modern standards -- their first big hit was a transformation of the Temptations' "I Can't Get Next to You" in 1970 -- and distinctive songwriter, penning or co-writing such classics "Tired of Being Alone," "Let's Stay Together," "I'm Still in Love with You," "Call Me (Come Back Home)," and "Here I Am (Come and Take Me)," songs that defined the sultry soul of their era and acted as a foundation for the quiet storm to come. Green's hot streak came to an abrupt halt in the late 1970s due to a number of tumultuous personal issues that convinced him to leave secular music behind and become an ordained minister. Throughout much of the '80s, he focused on Christian music but in 1988, he returned to R&B by duetting with Annie Lennox on a cover of the Jackie DeShannon song "Put a Little Love in Your Heart" -- a contribution to the Scrooged soundtrack that brought Green back into the Billboard Top Ten for the first time since 1974. Green soon released I Get Joy, the first in a series of regular new records that ran until 2008 when he released Lay It Down on Blue Note. The album, which was co-produced by Questlove, was his first record to reach the Billboard Top Ten since 1973, an extraordinary capper to a career that continued to thrive with live performances that included regular sermons at the Memphis church where he serves as a pastor.

Green was born in Forrest City, Arkansas, where he formed a gospel quartet, the Green Brothers, at the age of nine. They toured throughout the South in the mid-'50s before the family relocated to Grand Rapids, Michigan. The Green Brothers continued to perform in Grand Rapids, but Al's father kicked him out of the group after he caught his son listening to Jackie Wilson. At the age of 16, Al formed an R&B group, Al Green & the Creations, with several of his high school friends. Two Creation members, Curtis Rogers and Palmer James, founded their own independent record company, Hot Line Music Journal, and had the group record for the label. By that time, the Creations had been re-named the Soul Mates. The group's first single, "Back Up Train," became a surprise hit, climbing to number five on the R&B charts early in 1968. The Soul Mates attempted to record another hit, but all of their subsequent singles failed to find an audience.

In 1969, Al Green met bandleader and Hi Records vice-president Willie Mitchell while on tour in Midland, Texas. Impressed with Green's voice, he signed the singer to Hi Records, and began collaborating with Al on his debut album. Released in early 1970, Green Is Blues showcased the signature sound he and Mitchell devised -- a sinewy, sexy groove highlighted by horn punctuations and string beds that let Green showcase his remarkable falsetto. While the album didn't spawn any hit singles, it was well-received and set the stage for the breakthrough success of his second album. Al Green Gets Next to You (1970) launched his first hit single, "Tired of Being Alone," which began a streak of four straight gold singles. Let's Stay Together (1972) was his first genuine hit album, climbing to number eight on the pop charts; its title track became his first number one single. I'm Still in Love with You, which followed only a few months later, was an even greater success, peaking at number four and launching the hits "Look What You Done for Me" and "I'm Still in Love with You."

By the release of 1973's Call Me, Green was known as both a hitmaker and an artist who released consistently engaging, frequently excellent, critically acclaimed albums. His hits continued uninterrupted through the next two years, with "Call Me," "Here I Am," and "Sha-La-La (Make Me Happy)" all becoming Top Ten gold singles. At the height of his popularity, Green's former girlfriend, Mrs. Mary Woodson, broke into his Memphis home in October 1974 and poured boiling grits on the singer as he was bathing, inflicting second-degree burns on his back, stomach, and arm; after assaulting Green, she killed herself with his gun. Green interpreted the violent incident as a sign from God that he should enter the ministry. By 1976, he had bought a church in Memphis and had become an ordained pastor of the Full Gospel Tabernacle. Though he had begun to seriously pursue religion, he had not given up singing R&B and he released three other Mitchell-produced albums -- Al Green Is Love (1975), Full of Fire (1976), Have a Good Time (1976) -- after the incident. However, his albums began to sound formulaic, and his sales started to slip by the end of 1976, with disco cutting heavily into his audience.

In order to break free from his slump, Green stopped working with Willie Mitchell in 1977 and built his own studio, American Music, where he intended to produce his own records. The first effort he made at American Music was The Belle Album, an intimate record that was critically acclaimed but failed to win a crossover audience. Truth and Time (1978) failed to generate a major R&B hit. During a concert in Cincinnati in 1979, Green fell off the stage and nearly injured himself seriously. Interpreting the accident as a sign from God, Green retired from performing secular music and devoted himself to preaching. Throughout the '80s, he released a series of gospel albums on Myrrh Records. In 1982, Green appeared in the gospel musical Your Arms Too Short to Box with God with Patti Labelle. In 1985, he reunited with Willie Mitchell for He Is the Light, his first album for A&M Records.

Green tentatively returned to R&B in 1988 when he sang "Put a Little Love in Your Heart" with Annie Lennox for the Bill Murray comedy Scrooged. Four years later, he recorded his first full-fledged soul album since 1978 with the U.K.-only Don't Look Back. He was inducted to the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 1995. That same year, he released Your Heart's in Good Hands, an urban contemporary record that represented his first secular effort to be released in America since Truth and Time. Though the album received positive reviews, it failed to become a hit. Green did achieve widespread recognition eight years later with his first album for Blue Note, I Can't Stop. One and a half years later, he followed it with Everything's OK. His third Blue Note album, 2008's Lay It Down, featured an updated sound that still echoed the feel of his classic earlier soul style. It became his first Top Ten album since his '70s heyday.

Green largely stepped away from the studio after Lay It Down, contributing the occasional track to a project, duetting with Heather Headley on the 2009 album Oh Happy Day: An All-Star Music Celebration and covering Freddy Fender's "Before the Next Teardrop Falls" in 2018 as part of an ongoing series called Produced By. Green remained a presence on the stage, touring and continuing to give sermons into the 2020s”.

I am going to end there. The blessed and phenomenal Al Green celebrates his eightieth birthday on 15th April, and I know he will get a lot of love around the music industry. I hope radio stations salute him and his music is played widely. Below is just a selection of some of his timeless music. The kind that will move people for decades and centuries more. No doubt that Al Green is a…

PEERLESS artist.

FEATURE: Kate Bush: Them Heavy People: The Extraordinary Characters in Her Songs: Frederick Delius (Delius (Song of Summer)/Noah (The Big Sky)

FEATURE:

 

Kate Bush: Them Heavy People: The Extraordinary Characters in Her Songs

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1980 for a live performance of Delius (Song of Summer) from her third studio album, Never for Ever

Frederick Delius (Delius (Song of Summer)/Noah (The Big Sky)

__________

FOR this part of the…

PHOTO CREDIT: John Carder Bush

series where I look at characters included in Kate Bush songs, I am pairing two albums released five years apart. I will get to Hounds of Love and the second biblical character from the album I have included in this run. However, I am starting out with a real-life character from Never for Ever and a song which ranks alongside one of the best from Bush’s early career. There is a lot to discuss when it comes to Frederick Delius and Delius (Song of Summer). Let’s start off with some background to this song. I am turning to the Kate Bush Encyclopedia: “Delius (Song Of Summer)’ is a song written by Kate Bush as a tribute to the English composer Frederick Delius. The song was inspired by Ken Russell’s film Song of Summer, made for the BBC’s programme Omnibus, which Kate had watched when she was ten years old. In his twenties, Delius contracted syphilis. When he became wheelchair bound as he became older, a young English admirer Eric Fenby volunteered his services as unpaid amanuensis. Between 1928 and 1933 he took down his compositions from dictation, and helping him revise earlier works. The song was released on the album Never For Ever and as the B-side of the single Army Dreamers”. Although there is not a lot written from Kate Bush in terms of why she included Frederick Delius in a song and why she was inspired to do this, Never for Ever was a very interesting album. Released in September 1980, it went to number one in the U.K. It was the first time Kate Bush was coproducing her music. Working with Jon Kelly, although technology did play more of a role in The Dreaming (1982) and Hounds of Love (1985), you can hear some of its influence on Never for Ever. Specifically the Fairlight CMI. In terms of the options open for Bush as a songwriter, this was a really important time. A much broader palette she could work from. You can hear that on a song like Delius (Song of Summer). Whereas before Bush had to manipulate her own voice and was tied to the piano and limited as to what she could achieve on her first two albums, with the Fairlight CMI, she could programme sound effects and feed her vice through this equipment to create new worlds.

Bush was instantly attracted to the Fairlight CMI. She said how she could create this human, emotional and animal sound that did not feel like it was machine-made. If co-producer Jon Kelly was a bit more old-skool and was confused why an instrument could not be played and why it had to be fed through the Fairlight CMI, it was clear that Kate Bush knew that modern technology could take her music to new heights. She could be much more imaginative as a songwriter. It is interesting about the timing of the Fairlight CMI. It is all over The Dreaming but was a little late to impact Never for Ever. I guess she would have liked to have used it more but she was wrestling with the technology. Working out of Abbey Road Studio and there were multiple multi-track machines loaded up. Getting into this tangle, it was not always a smooth process. However, you can feel something taking shape and Bush’s music transforming. Never for Ever a big step on from 1978’s Lionheart. By all accounts, the recording and atmosphere at Abbey Road was fun and creative. Sessions did go long into the night and Bush was typically a night creature. She was experimenting and throwing quite a lot into the mix. Delius (Song of Summer) is sparser than other songs on Never for Ever, though you can feel sounds and vocal elements that were centred around the Fairlight CMI. I think in the case of Delius (Song of Summer) the Roland synthesiser provided the percussion sound. Whereas the technology might not be the most notable element of this song, I feel that you can feel Bush’s writing definitely opening up and expanding. Bass voices by Paddy Bush and Ian Bairnson. Paddy Bush playing the sitar. Such a rich composition and a quirky song, there is also this level of preciousness’ that is worth noting. How Bush was ten when she watched Omnibus and was struck enough where she would later write a song about this underrated English composer.

It is not the only example of Bush seeing something on T.V. and that leading to a song. A 1967 adaptation of Wuthering Heights inspired her 1978 debut single. In the case of Delius (Song of Summer), she kept the memory of Omnibus in her mind for a decade before letting it out through song. It makes me wonder about a certain affluence. Song of Summer is a 1968 black-and-white television episode co-written, produced, and directed by Ken Russell for the BBC's Omnibus series which was first broadcast on 15th September, 1968. I wonder how many people in the U.K. had a television and how common it was. It seems like Bush and her family watched quite a bit of T.V. and there was all this culture around. In 1968, she was living at East Wickham Farm in Welling. It was this middle-class part of Kent, so it might have been more common than other parts of the U.K. I do wonder how many of Kate Bush’s songs would have never been written were it not for television. How many ten-year-olds would have watched something as high-brow as an Omnibus show and both been engrossed and then thought of a song afterwards?! The closing line of Delius (Song of Summer), “In B. Fenby”, was written by someone who did not know she would soon meet Eric Fenby. Fenby, as this big fan of Frederick Delius, was devoted to the point where he transcribed and noted down compositions when Delius became wheelchair-bound. Bush met an older Eric Fenby when she appeared on The Russell Harty Show and performed a version of it alongside Paddy Bush (who played the part of Delius in a wheelchair).

A couple of other things to note about Delius (Song of Summer). That link to Classical music. When it comes to Kate Bush, we often hear about her influences in connection with popular music. Artists like David Bowie and Roxy Music. However, growing up in a household where there would have been Classical music played and you feel her father in particular was a fan of that genre, it is surprise that she did not explore this more. Her father was a fan of Chopin, but Bush seems to have been more inspired by other genres like Pop and Folk. However, strings and orchestration did come more into her work later. Something epic and symphonic appears on Never for Ever in the form of Breathing. The beautiful strings on The Dreaming’s Houdini. Hounds of Love’s Hello Earth operation and classical. One of these what-if questions relates to Kate Bush composing for film and T.V. I often wonder what it would be like if she did compose. You can hear her compositional flair and that sense of scale on albums like Hounds of Love, Aerial (2005) and even 50 Words for Snow (2011). I do wonder if a future album might take this even further. Though the work of Frederick Delius is not something you can directly hear in Bush’s work, it is noteworthy that she wanted to write a song about a Classical composer and, soon after, her work would become more symphonic and almost Classic in some ways. The unique subject matter is something typically Kate Bush. We talk about songs like Wuthering Heights and how inspired that is. People do not discuss Delius (Song of Summer) and its brilliance. There are not a lot of words in the song but each one is brilliantly evocative and incredible. “Ooh, ah, ooh, ah/Delius/Delius amat/Syphilus/Deus/Genius, ooh/To be sung of a summer night on the water/Ooh, on the water/“Ta, ta-ta!/Hmm/Ta, ta-ta!/In B, Fenby!”/To be sung of a summer night on the water/Ooh, on the water/On the water”. Humorous, strange and conversational, it is kudos to Bush as a producer and songwriter. Bush using Latin in the song.

I want to end this half with a fascinating article from Dreams of Orgonon that I have sourced before. The last conversation idea around Delius (Song of Summer) is Bush’s use of real-life people in her songs. Whilst most of her characters are fictional and invented by her, this is a rare case of Bush inspired by a well-known figure. However, I wonder how many people knew about Frederick Delius in 1980? A composer who died in 1934, few knew about Delius’s music and story when they heard this song on Never for Ever:

“To explain what Bush doesn’t, Frederick Theodore Albert Delius began his career as a full-time composer in Paris in 1886, channeling the influence of black music (which he discovered while failing to manage a Florida orange plantation) and European composers such as Wagner and Grieg into his own orchestral pieces (in a declaration of emotional hedonism, he described music as “an outburst of the soul” which is “addressed and should appeal instantly to the soul of the listener”). By the 1890s, he became popular in Imperial Germany thanks to the promotional efforts of German conductors. It took longer for Delius’ music to take off in his native Britain, but it eventually gained enough popular heft for Westminster to hold a six-day Delius festival in the late 1920s. By that point, Delius had contracted tertiary syphilis from extramarital affairs he’d conducted in Paris and was blind and paralyzed. In the final stage of his life, he was tended by his astonishingly dedicated wife Jelka Rosen, who gave up a genuinely successful art career to be his caretaker. Yet even with his devastating syphilis, he remained creative. From 1928 to 1934, Delius was assisted in his compositional efforts by a fellow Yorkshireman, Eric Fenby. For the duration of that time, Fenby served as Delius’ amanuensis, assisting him in the composition of some of his better-known pieces, such as the tone poem A Song of Summer, one of his more useful works for our purposes, as it provides the title of Ken Russell’s Delius biopic.

In terms of progenitors, Delius and Bush are operate in adjacent but separate traditions. Delius was heavily influenced by American music, particularly black music. He was fonder of popular music than some of his contemporaries (there’s a true-to-life scene in the film A Song of Summer where Delius jauntily enjoys listening to “Old Man River”) and was heavily influenced by his nostalgia for his plantation days. According to Delius, the black workers on the plantation “showed a truly wonderful sense of musicianship and harmonic resource in the instinctive way in which they treated a melody, and, hearing their singing in such romantic surroundings, it was then and there that I first felt the urge to express myself in music.” The implications of this statement are mixed in nature. On the one hand, channeling the innovations of black music into critically respected symphonies in the Jim Crow era was a step forward in terms of taking the musical abilities of black people seriously. Alternatively, there’s a distressing mystification of exploited black workers in Delius’ description. Their labor is something for him to enjoy personally, rather than a way for these doubtlessly persecuted people to alleviate the astounding difficulties of plantation work. As is the norm for popular music, Delius treats black people as inspirations for his own creations rather than innovators who paved the way for 20th century music.

Bush’s relationship to black music has more distance. I’ve expounded on how Bush is primarily a British songwriter influenced by English artists. Those English artists, such as Bowie and Ferry, were in turn publicly and unashamedly influenced by American black music. Bush’s own terribly white style has less to do with R&B. Lionheart is a quasi-jazz album, and Bush was a fan of Billie Holiday, but Holiday’s influence on her work isn’t nearly as obvious as the watermark of Ziggy Stardust or The Wall. It’s not that Bush doesn’t engage with the musical creations of racial minorities — she will later in her career, with results that range from well-intentioned misfires like “The Dreaming” and blatantly offensive works like “Eat the Music.” When we get to The Dreaming, we’ll have to talk about the rise of world music and Bush’s part in it, as The Dreaming pays more attention to ethnic minorities than the rest of her work (I’m going to spend a lot of the next few months arguing that The Dreaming is a flawed work of post-colonial horror). So while Delius is directly influenced by black music, Bush is only tangentially marked by it, in the same way that most artists who create popular music is going to touch on R&B or rock ‘n’ roll in some fashion. As things stand, both Delius and Bush have admiring but flawed views on black music, acknowledging its importance without fully understanding the struggles behind it.

“Delius (Song of Summer)” contains flashes of its subject’s life. “Oh, he’s a moody old man,” muses Bush, referring to Delius’ volatile behavior as reported by Fenby, then referencing Delius’ work by adding “song of summer in his hand.” The song plays out like a duet between Fenby and Delius — Fenby’s reserved nature and devout Catholicism often led to the young man becoming overwhelmed by his employer’s secularism and cantankerousness (Paddy Bush is heard gruffly saying “ta-ta-ta” and “in B, Fenby!”, quotes from Ken Russell’s film Song of Summer). The chorus, a sequence of Latin or Latin-ish phrases, sounds like a despairing yet awed prayer of elegy by Fenby: “Delius/Delius amat” (Bush continues to fail at foreign languages by attaching the third-person present “amat” to “Delius,” while also touching on Delius’ atheism), and the genuinely gut-busting rhyme of “syphilis/deus/genius,” the latter of which she pronounces in Latin. “Delius” is neither hagiographical nor harshly critical of its song — it simply evokes his ethos and how the people in his orbit perceived him.

Or at the very least, it perceives Delius according to filmmaker Ken Russell’s treatment of him. “Delius” is heavily indebted to Russell’s 1968 BBC adaptation of Eric Fenby’s memoir Delius as I Knew Him, called Song of Summer. The film is told through the perspective of Fenby (a young Christopher Gable, who Doctor Who fans might recognize), who initially approaches Delius as an admirer and quickly becomes a distant and subordinate collaborator to him. The Delius of the movie (Max Adrian, and yes Song of Summer doubles as a trivia game for Doctor Who fans) is not a legend nor a booming celebrity, but a foul-tempered geriatric has-been, confined by his illness and domineering personality. This could easily turn into a cynical story about how young creatives should never meet their heroes, but Song of Summer is smarter than that. While it doesn’t understate the fact that Delius was plainly an asshole, neither does it understate the human costs of his cruelty. There are some gorgeous scenes where Delius becomes fully animated by the power of music and creation, and Fenby, while alienated from his hero, is equally drawn in. Russell depicts two men whose struggles are both reconciled and exacerbated by the creative process. Russell’s script is imbued with psychological realness, which is granted to every character — Jelka Delius finally gets justice in an astonishing scene where she breaks down over her husband’s infidelity and cruelty. Typically for Ken Russell’s work, Song of Summer moves gracefully, with equal measures of ambivalence and clarity. Of the films Kate Bush has touched to date, this may be the best.

Recorded at Abbey Road Studio 2 during the sessions of January-June 1980. Released on Never for Ever on 7 September 1980. Music video shown during Dr. Hook and The Russell Harty Show on 7 April 1980 and 25 November 1980, respectively. Never performed live. Personnel: Kate Bush — vocals, piano, production. Roland — percussion (tongue-in-cheek credit on the album’s liner notes). Paddy Bush — Delius, sitar, bass voice. Alan Murphy — electric guitar. Ian Bairnson — bass voice. Preston Heyman — additional percussion. Jon Kelly — production, engineer. Pictures: Max Adrian & Christopher Gable in A Song of Summer (1968, dir. Ken Russell); Kate Bush in a swan dress”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush on the set of The Big Sky

I am going to move to a song from Hounds of Love that turns forty on 21st April. The fourth and final single from the masterpiece album, The Big Sky is my favourite track from Hounds of Love. If we hear God mentioned and prominent in Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God), then Noah is a more fleeting reference. However, I think that it is quite relevant. I will revisit a couple of interviews with Kate Bush that I have included in Kate Bush features, as it shows that The Big Sky was a hard song to put together. The Kate Bush Encyclopedia provide these valuable archive resources:

“The Big Sky’ was a song that changed a lot between the first version of it on the demo and the end product on the master tapes. As I mentioned in the earlier magazine, the demos are the masters, in that we now work straight in the 24-track studio when I’m writing the songs; but the structure of this song changed quite a lot. I wanted to steam along, and with the help of musicians such as Alan Murphy on guitar and Youth on bass, we accomplished quite a rock-and-roll feel for the track. Although this song did undergo two different drafts and the aforementioned players changed their arrangements dramatically, this is unusual in the case of most of the songs. (Kate Bush Club newsletter, Issue 18, 1985)

‘The Big Sky’ gave me terrible trouble, really, just as a song. I mean, you definitely do have relationships with some songs, and we had a lot of trouble getting on together and it was just one of those songs that kept changing – at one point every week – and, um…It was just a matter of trying to pin it down. Because it’s not often that I’ve written a song like that: when you come up with something that can literally take you to so many different tangents, so many different forms of the same song, that you just end up not knowing where you are with it. And, um…I just had to pin it down eventually, and that was a very strange beast. (Tony Myatt Interview, November 1985)”.

The takeaway is that The Big Sky came together slowly and through different stages. Given that the track is quite child-like in nature, almost like a homework assignment! The Big Sky is the owner of clouds and gazing up. A cloud that looks like Ireland. Clouds full of rain and weather connections. Hounds of Love is full of weather and water. The Ninth Wave on the second side and Cloudbusting on the first side. What is intriguing is that one of the loosest and most joyous songs was perhaps the most challenging to get together. I guess it happens with songs, but you listen to the album version and cannot hear any of that struggle. The bass part of this song is especially fascinating.

Hounds of Love as an album is often commending because it did not feature a lot of bass. However, I think that the bassline from Youth (Martin Glover) is remarkable. So frantic, energetic and groovy, it showcases the musical diversity of Hounds of Love. The Fairlight CMI plays a big role and there are synthesisers and electronic elements. However, some of its most powerful moments arrive when more traditional and human-led performances take centre stage. Some great handclapping from Charlie Morgan and Del Palmer. Morris Pert and Charlie Morgan on percussion and drums. Alan Murphy’s guitar. Paddy Bush on didgeridoo. Even though The Big Sky only reached thirty-seven, it did get a lot of critical love. In terms of how Bush was perceived by the press at this time, Hounds of Love reset things. Just before Hounds of Love came out in 1985, many in the press wrote her off and asked where she was. 1982’s The Dreaming got some positive reviews, though many found the album too strange and off-putting. Huge singles like Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) and Hounds of Love won a lot of praise. Still picking up momentum in 1986, The Big Sky was met with acclaim. Even if Bush found it hard to get The Big Sky finished and it was this challenge, she did release it as a single. The music video is fantastic. Kate Bush directed it. After directing the Hounds of Love single video, this was her second solo effort as a director: “It was filmed on 19 March 1986 at Elstree Film Studios in the presence of a studio audience of about hundred fans. The Homeground fanzine was asked to get this audience together, and they did within two weeks. Two coaches took everyone from Manchester Square to Elstree studios early in the morning, after which the Homeground staff, who were cast as some of the aviators, were filmed, and finally the whole audience was admitted for the ‘crowd scenes’. The scenes were repeated until Kate had them as she wanted”.

When thinking about Noah in the lines, “This cloud, this cloud/Says “Noah/C’mon and build me an Ark.”/And if you’re coming, jump/‘Cause”. I have already featured biblical characters in this series. It is interesting that they feature sporadically on her albums. If God was used as this deal-broker in the most popular song from Hounds of Love, there is something more throwaway or less significant here. However, it is interesting that Bush mentioned Noah. The story of Noah in The Bible (Genesis 6–9) tells of a righteous man commanded by God to build a massive ark to save his family and pairs of every animal from a global flood, designed to purge the earth of rampant wickedness. The lyrics on The Big Sky is fascinating. I think it is this perfectly blend of this joyful, oblique and mysterious. The opening lines have always perplexed me in terms of exactly what they mean: “They look down/At the ground/Missing/But I never go in now”. I wonder exactly what those words mean. Who Bush is referring to when she sings “You never really understood me/You never really tried”. I know Bush wrote a lot of Hounds of Love in Ireland, and I am not sure whether The Big Sky was one of the songs written there. Because of the countryside and landscape of Dublin and maybe her mind thinking about clouds and the weather. The inclusion of Noah is inspired. It gives this sense of the epic and biblical to a song that could otherwise have been fluffy and infantile. It is a standout from Hounds of Love. If Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God), Cloudbusting and Hounds of Love are quite serious or deeper songs, I love that there is this free spirit and abandon on The Big Sky. Although it is a cloud talking to Noah rather than a physical embodiment of the biblical figure, it is another case of Bush using religious imagery to great effect.

It is interesting that Noah is perhaps more significant than we would imagine listening to the song through. For her fan club newsletter in 1985, Kate Bush spoke about The Big Sky and said this: “I used to do this a lot as a child, just watching the clouds go into different shapes. I think we forget these pleasures as adults. We don’t get as much time to enjoy those kinds of things, or think about them; we feel silly about what we used to do naturally. The song is also suggesting the coming of the next flood – how perhaps the “fools on the hills” will be the wise ones”. Bush connecting with her childhood and bringing that into the song. Also, something far grander and more serious. If Cloudbusting is a song about a machine that could make it rain, perhaps this is the result of that. A two-part epic. These seemingly harmless clouds in the sky that twist into the shape will summon something destructive. Is this literal rain or something political? Hounds of Love perhaps has fewer characters than some Kate Bush albums, though I feel they are among the most discussion-worthy. I will come to Cloudbusting and a piece of literature that inspired the song. There is also the Mother in Mother Stands for Comfort. Characters to be found through The Ninth Wave. Maybe the eponymous Hounds of Love too. However, Noah is inserted into a song that is partly whimsical and child-like. Maybe ominous in the sense that there is this coming flood, it is interesting how water is at the centre of Hounds of Love. The flood of The Big Sky and the sea and the heroine being stranded through The Ninth Wave. This article is titled Water, Music, and Transformation in The Ninth Wave by Kate Bush and makes some interesting observations: “Bush’s album skilfully frames water symbolically, historically and pop-culturally: the art of musical storytelling is accompanied by the symbolic dissection of the trope of water. With a peculiar blend of empathy, darkness, and gratitude, The Ninth Wave serves as an intriguing example of how mutability should not be perceived as a dangerous force but as a positive, or even a necessary one. Water is dangerous; there is no doubt about that, but without its transformative qualities, there would be no maturation of the individual. Since antiquity, the abyss of water has been a symbol of wisdom – mysterious, unfathomable, yet regenerative in its nature. Paradoxically, the threat that water poses functions as a catalyst for maturation. As the beginning of The Ninth Wave depicts, the destructive potential of water reveals what is indeed important for the individual trapped in dire straits, which is the connection to other human beings”. A fascinating English composer immortalised in Never for Ever’s Delius (Song of Summer) and a biblical figure treated in Hounds of Love’s The Big Sky, I wanted to pair them to show the sheer range of characters Bush uses in her songs. Kate Bush is a writer and storytelling…

LIKE no other.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Tolou

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

PHOTO CREDIT: Edwig Henson

Tolou

__________

THERE are some more recent…

interviews I want to get to, but I will start out with start out with one from 2024. Vogue Scandinavia focused on this amazing Norwegian-Nigerian artist. Tolou is someone that you need to know. I am quite new to her music, though I have been listening back to her earliest tracks. Her phenomenal debut album, Energy, came out in January. I am going to move on to interviews published close to the release of that album:

“Does musical artist Tolou believe in fate? “Girl, absolutely,” she responds with a smile, a bright blue headband holding her signature, superfine blonde microbraids back from her freckled face. “I believe in God, I believe everything has meaning, that everything happens for a reason,” the Norwegian-Nigerian 26-year-old says. Whether or not you’re also a believer, you can’t deny something powerful is at play when it comes to Tolou’s journey.

Fittingly, it all began in a church. The Arctic Cathedral, to be specific, with its imposing triangular facade jutting out from the mountainous landscape of Tromsø, the northernmost city in the world and Tolou’s Norwegian hometown. “It’s so far north, if you go on a map, it’s as north as you can get. We’re right up near the North Pole,” she giggles. Within the towering angular walls of the remote cathedral, Tolou, with her natural vocal talent, directed the youth choir. And one day, as fate would have it, legendary Haitian rapper and record producer Wyclef Jean – renowned for his work with Destiny’s Child, Whitney Houston, and Fugees, to name a few – just so happened to walk through the cathedral’s doors. “He was here in Tromsø performing and they were filming an acoustic music video,” Tolou explains. After seeing her perform, Jean invited her to his concert, and then, with his manager, challenged her to sing on the spot. “I did, of course,” she says, her confident tone never wavering.

Alongside her pop fixation, the musical influences of Tolou's youth were varied and eclectic, including her Norwegian grandmother’s love of country music (“I sang Dolly Parton’s ‘I Will Always Love You’ to my school of about a thousand kids when I was super young”) and her older brother’s metal band, who called on her to step in as vocalist from time to time (“I was head-banging on stage, rock’n’roll, it came so naturally to me”). Tolou’s musical passion is so palpable that even the way she speaks is melodic, with staccato rhythms and syncopated pauses leading into breathy, rapid-fire riffs of words.

Tolou credits her unfaltering confidence, in part, to the time she spent working with Jean, albeit remotely; their collaboration coincided with the Covid lockdown, which left her stuck in the distant northern reaches of Norway. “It made me even more independent,” she explains. “Often as a female artist, you go to a studio with a producer and you’re just sitting at the back. You don’t know yourself or what you can do.” But by necessity during lockdown, Jean had Tolou writing, producing beats, recording and mixing all by herself, in Tromsø. “It really taught me that not everybody else knows better than me sometimes,” she says. “I should trust myself.”

Aside from her Spotify plays and live performance dates, Tolou’s popularity is most evident on social media where she’s racked up legions of fans – her recent drop ‘A Little Bit Sad’, which addresses the heartbreak that kept her, fatefully, in LA, resonated on her buzzy TikTok account. But Tolou is unfazed by the attention. “It’s really fun when I see all those views on my videos, but it doesn’t really affect me. Us people from northern Norway, we’re very authentic. We just are who we are. Like, we’re not that mysterious,” she smiles.

As her star rises and her name becomes more internationally recognised, Tolou’s sincere authenticity cannot be shaken. “I want to make global music and I want to be wherever the music takes me,” she says. “People ask me, ‘Why don’t you go somewhere else for your braids when you’re in the UK or USA? Why don’t you just have someone else do it?’, but I need to go back home for my soul. It’s crucial for me to stay connected to Norway and my mum, to remind myself of my values and where I came from”.

I am going to move to an interview with CLASH and their Next Wave feature. Published last month, whilst one might see Tolou as purely or mainly Afro-Pop, she has this very eclectic and wide-ranging musical upbringing. I am really eager to see where this artist heads. I do hope that she plays in the U.K. at some point, as I know that there will be many here that want to see her perform:

“Growing up as a Nigerian-Norwegian in the North of Norway, Tolou chose to view it as a strength, refusing to let her environment limit her; “I’m a Black girl, I can do pop”. Her  blonde micro braids signify a connection between both cultures, as a crown of who she is and the pride she takes in her upbringing and how she was raised. “I always wanted to take that with me as much as I could; as much as I knew honestly.”

Tolou’s debut album ‘Energy’ reflects influences from both Scandinavian pop, which she grew up on, and afrobeats, which her Dad often played when she spent time with him in London. “I grew up with a lot of Scandinavian pop, and RnB. Beyonce was actually the first record I bought. I looked up to her and Rihanna since they were the only people that looked like me at the time. When I travelled to England to visit my father, he would play afrobeats, and I would go to the family gatherings and everybody would dance. I thought it was so cool how everyone was dancing, every age. That’s when I realised I wanted to make people dance like that”.

Her debut gave her an opportunity to be vulnerable, bridging the gap as she focused on themes of self confidence, finding genuine connection, and having a stable foundation in life during moments of heartbreak. Expressing what she wants, Tolou voices her desire for honesty when meeting someone new. “Show me your intentions. I need to know that you’re seriously into me before I even give you the time of day… my song ‘into me’ focuses on that moment when a guy likes you, but you don’t know why they like you. Like is it my face, or because of who I am as a human being?” When asked to give advice on love, Tolou simply says; “Don’t rush. You have time, and you’re not supposed to be stressed out. If he’s stressing you out, and making you doubt yourself, he’s not right for you. Honestly, my biggest lesson in 2025 was to surrender and let God handle it. It’s not my thing to control at the end of the day.”

‘Energy’ shows that journey of finding yourself again whilst going through a lot of change in life. Tolou’s personal life had a lot of influence in the album, songwriting becoming a diary for her feelings to be housed. “Every song is like a diary of how I was feeling at that specific moment. After I got signed and came to America, I went through my trials and tribulations. I had to go through a journey of self rediscovery.” When you’re in a certain environment for so long that’s the only version of yourself you know. Being placed in a drastically different environment forced Tolou to explore who she was outside of Norway, whilst getting used to the reality of her career setting off. “I definitely had to be broken down before I built myself up again”.

The warm ambiance of the album will have you wishing for a year long getaway on an island. When asked about what songs she would recommend as the soundtrack to a vacation, Tolou responds; “See, it’s different vibes. If you have someone at home that you’re missing, then ‘wasting your time’. I actually wrote that song about a boy in my hometown. I was like, even if I’m wasting my time and risk getting heartbroken, I still like you. If you’re looking for some new love, listen to ‘body’. Body is actually an interpolation of ‘so sick’ by Ne-Yo. Tricky Stewart (grammy winning producer) and Theron Thomas wrote it. That’s the only song on the album that wasn’t written by me; it’s definitely important for my artistry to write”.

The final interview I am including is from 1883 Magazine. They included her in their 18 Questions feature. I have selected a few that caught my eye. Anyone who has not discovered Tolou needs to check her out now. Someone who is going to go very far and has a long career ahead. Energy is a remarkable debut album:

“Favourite memory growing up?

Performing on stage. That was always my happiest moment—whether it was with my brother’s metal band or singing in church. That was my favorite place to be. There was this yearly festival we used to play at, and it felt like a dream.

Where was the last place you travelled to?

I just came from Paris. I had rehearsals there with my choreographer and dancers, and I also went to a fashion show for Kwame Adusei.

What was the last thing that made you laugh?

I laughed really hard at my mom on the phone yesterday. She has the funniest comments sometimes – with a little bit of shade, haha. I definitely get my sense of humor from her.

What’s your nighttime ritual?

The one thing that stays consistent in a busy travel schedule is my skincare. I love putting on all my serums and creams so my skin is glowy. And sometimes I’ll drink a cup of tea to calm my voice.

Who would be on your dream dinner party guest list?

I’m such a music lover – Rihanna, Pharrell Williams, Lana Del Rey, Sade, Frank Ocean, Wizkid, Beyoncé.

What is the major throughline on your debut album Energy?

The major throughline of the album is learning to trust and embody your own energy. Moving with faith, confidence, and presence rather than fear.

What were your favourite moments from recording the project?

Traveling to Atlanta and making “Into Me” and “Body.” Working with the legend Tricky Stewart was incredibly inspiring. He’s literally the king of crossover records and has worked extensively with artists I admire so much, like Rihanna and Beyoncé.

What’s on your rider for a show?

Nuts, fruit, water, ginger, honey, and tea.

Finally, what is one thing you would like to manifest for yourself and why?

A sold-out world tour because performing live is where I feel most alive, and connecting with fans and sharing that energy around the world is my dream”.

One of the most promising new artists around, I feel that the next few years will see Tolou play huge international stages and collaborate with some of her music idols. This is a very special talent that you need to bring into your life. Go and throw your support behind Tolou. You just know that she is primed to…

TAKE over the world.

___________

Follow Tolou

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/tolouofficial/

TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@tolouofficial

YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoS2e85rwMSS0erU6HL-nng

Spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/artist/6aJLBAuRRedmYQfUxXUByH?si=bi5RwmeER_mkgIe5Z7pDQw

FEATURE: Be Thankful for What You’ve Got: Massive Attack's Blue Lines at Thirty-Five

FEATURE:

 

 

Be Thankful for What You’ve Got

Massive Attack's Blue Lines at Thirty-Five

__________

EVEN if it is not a massive anniversary…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Massive Attack (Robert '3D' Del Naja, Grant 'Daddy G' Marshall and Andrew 'Mushroom' Vowles) in June 1991/PHOTO CREDIT: Kevin Cummins/Getty Images

the same way as a thirtieth or fortieth, I think that a thirty-fifth anniversary is still important. That takes me to Massive Attack’s debut album, Blue Lines. Released on 8th April, 1991, it took about eight months for the group to put the album together. Blending genres like Soul, Reggae and Electric, Blue Lines is often simply seen as a Trip-Hop album. I guess it is, though it is so much more than that. Perhaps inspiring other artists like Tricky and Portishead, Blue Lines is one of the most influential albums of the last thirty-five years. Robert ‘3D’ Del Naja, Grant ‘Daddy G’ Marshall, and Andrew ‘Mushroom’ Vowles created a masterpiece with their debut. I previously celebrated thirty-five years of its second single Unfinished Sympathy. Also on Blue Lines is Safe from Harm, Be Thankful for What You’ve Got, and Daydreaming. One Love is perhaps my favourite from the album. A top twenty on the U.K. chart, Blue Lines must go down as one of the best debut albums ever. The Bristol group worked with collaborators such as Shara Nelson and Horace Andy to give the album these different vocal personality and layers. The tracks vary too. One might assume the album to be quite samey in terms of sound, yet Safe from Harm sounds a different beast to One Love or Hymn of the Big Wheel. Prior to its thirty-fifth anniversary, I want to introduce some features about the seismic and staggering Blue Lines. I am starting out with Albumism and their feature from 2021, as they marked thirty years of a classic:

“The origin of Massive Attack dates back to the mid 1980s, when 3D, Daddy G, and Mushroom formed the now-legendary Bristol sound system The Wild Bunch with their kindred musical spirits, including producer Nellee Hooper (Soul II Soul, Björk), DJ Milo Johnson, and Adrian “Tricky” Thaws. Through their shared admiration for graffiti art and various musical styles, downtempo rhythms, and subdued vocals, the collective both embodied and advanced the Bristol underground scene. “[Bristol’s] like a town masquerading as a city, and what it's always been good at is the underground scene, in both art and music,” 3D, a former graffiti artist, told The Telegraph in 2008. “Bands would flourish locally before they reached a national level and because there was never a big media or music industry here, people were doing it for their own gratification. Creativity here never grew in a contrived way, people were just teaching themselves and beating off the competition to become a big fish in a small pond."

From their earliest days to their aforementioned recent recordings, Massive Attack have avoided succumbing to narcissism and the celebrity spotlight, as their mugs have never appeared on any of their albums or singles’ front covers. It would seem, then, that the group prefers for their music, and not their faces, to define their artistic identity whilst preserving their professional integrity. Moreover, their reputation as ambassadors of the so-called Bristol Sound has always seemed to make the group a bit uneasy. “There’s this Bristol myth,” a dismissive 3D insisted during an April 1991 NME interview. “Everyone talks about a Bristol sound, but half our album was done in London and the video for ‘Unfinished Sympathy’ was shot in LA.”

Geographical contextualization aside, Blue Lines, their debut long player from which the masterful “Unfinished Sympathy” originates, was a landmark achievement at the time of its release. Together with Soul II Soul’s Club Classics Vol. One (1989), The KLF’s White Room (1991), LFO’s Frequencies (1991), The Orb’s The Orb's Adventures Beyond the Ultraworld (1991), and Primal Scream’s Screamadelica (1991), Blue Lines proved a vital blueprint for the proliferation of British dance music as the end of the 20th century approached. Its mellifluous mélange of various inspirations characterized by assorted hip-hop breakbeats, expertly selected samples (Billy Cobham, Funkadelic, Al Green, Isaac Hayes, etc.), dense dub rhythms, cerebral rhymes, and soulful guest vocals is unabashedly reverential to the past, but still represents a fresh and novel sound imitated by no one at the time.

Recorded in Bristol and London in 1990 into early 1991 and released on their own Wild Bunch imprint by way of Virgin/Circa, Blue Lines was the outcome not just of Massive Attack’s musical vision, but also a fair amount of coaxing by one of the group’s most devoted champions. “We were lazy Bristol twats,” Daddy G conceded to The Observer in 2004. “It was Neneh Cherry who kicked our arses and got us in the studio. We recorded a lot at her house, in her baby's room. It stank for months and eventually we found a dirty nappy behind a radiator. I was still DJing, but what we were trying to do was create dance music for the head, rather than the feet. I think it's our freshest album, we were at our strongest then.”

Executive produced by Cherry’s musical collaborator and husband, Cameron “Booga Bear” McVey, the album was co-produced by the group and the late Jonny Dollar. (As a side note, due to assumed sensitivities concerning the Persian Gulf War raging at the time of the album's completion and per McVey's urging, the initial pressings of Blue Lines and the "Unfinished Sympathy" single were adorned with the temporarily abbreviated band moniker "Massive." A ceasefire was declared on February 28, 1991, and "Attack" was then reincorporated for all subsequent LP pressings and singles.)

Album opener and third single “Safe From Harm” offers one of the album’s most dramatic and foreboding arrangements, largely built around the sample of the revered jazz fusion composer Billy Cobham’s “Stratus” (1973). The track’s subdued, swirling sonics provide the perfect backdrop for Nelson’s defiant voice to shine, as she vows to protect her “baby” amidst the inevitable madness of the world and convincingly admonishes “if you hurt what's mine / I'll sure as hell retaliate.”

Though Nelson casts a wide spell across Blue Lines, the same can absolutely be said for the prolific, sweet-voiced reggae crooner Horace Andy, who features on three tracks with the geopolitically charged album closer “Hymn of the Big Wheel” the most memorable of the bunch. Andy assumes a paternal tone throughout the track, as he reflects on life (“the wheel”) and the human struggle to preserve one’s innocence in the midst of the world’s destructive forces. He laments the environmental impact of industrialization across the song’s most poignant verse: “We sang about the sun and danced among the trees / And we listened to the whisper of the city on the breeze / Will you cry in the most in a lead-free zone / Down within the shadows where the factories drone / On the surface of the wheel they build another town / And so the green come tumbling down / Yes close your eyes and hold me tight / And I'll show you sunset sometime again.”

Despite its plaintive lyrics, “Hymn of the Big Wheel” concludes with a redemptive refrain, as the sanguine Andy surmises “The ghetto sun will nurture life / and mend my soul sometime again.”

Other standouts include the dubbed-out “Five Man Army,” the slinky groove of the Nelson blessed “Lately,” and slow funk of the title track, which lifts Tom Scott & The L.A. Express’ 1974 single “Sneakin’ in the Back” to great effect. Featuring Tony Bryan on vocals, the group’s cover of William DeVaughn’s 1974 hit “Be Thankful for What You've Got” is faithful to the original—a tad too faithful, perhaps—and easy on the ears, but it’s also the album’s most incongruous moment, largely owing to being the most obviously derivative among Blue Lines’ nine compositions”.

There is a lot written about Blue Lines, so apologies to throw a lot in! Such an important album, I did want to include a few different pieces. This article is one that talks about, among other things, the legacy and impact of Blue Lines. I was seven when the album came out, so perhaps a bit young to remember it. However, in years since, this has become one of my all-time favourites:

“Blue Lines was the work of Massive Attack’s original lineup, with Marshall joined by Robert “3D” Del Naja, Andrew “Mushroom” Vowles and Adrian “Tricky” Thaws, all of whom had previously worked with Bristol-based sound system, The Wild Bunch. However, Blue Lines greatly benefitted from the group’s desire to collaborate, with Jonny Dollar (Gabrielle, Neneh Cherry) co-producing and special guests Shara Nelson and Jamaican reggae icon Horace Andy supplying decisive vocal performances on the record’s key tracks.

Indeed, it’s fair to say both vocalists excelled themselves on Blue Lines. Andy turned in superb performances on the redemptive “Hymn Of The Big Wheel” and an uplifting cover of William Vaughan’s 1972 soul classic “Be Thankful For What You Got,” while Nelson arguably stole the show with her contributions to the album’s twin peaks, “Safe From Harm” and “Unfinished Sympathy.” Featuring neatly-spliced Funkadelic and Herbie Hancock samples, the former made for a compelling listen, but it was “Unfinished Sympathy” which really set Blue Lines apart. Enveloped by a glorious, cascading string arrangement and topped off by Nelson’s soaring, soul-searching vocal, the song was a widescreen pop classic and its U.K. chart peak of No. 13 brokered Massive Attack’s mainstream breakthrough.

With “Unfinished Sympathy” also going Top 20 in several European territories, Blue Lines did brisk business on the charts, rising to a peak of No. 13 and eventually going double platinum in the U.K. In the long run, though, its critical cachet has vastly outstripped its commercial returns.

Rolling Stone went on to declare that Blue Lines was “the blueprint for trip-hop” – the genre-tag later applied to like-minded 90s classic such as Tricky’s solo debut Maxinquaye and Dummy by fellow Bristolians Portishead – and the album is still regularly cited for its role in shepherding dance music into more introspective realms. “On its release, Blue Lines felt like nothing else,” The Guardian’s Alex Petridis wrote in a 2012 retrospective. “But it still sounds unique, which is remarkable given how omnipresent trip-hop was to become.”

“I was still DJ-ing when we made Blue Lines, but what we were trying to do with it was create dance music for the head rather than the feet,” Daddy G reflected in an interview with The Observer in 2013. “I still think it’s our freshest album”.

Prior to ending with a review from Pitchfork, there are a couple more features I want to get to. In 2012, The Guardian focused on the remastered edition of Blue Lines. They write how “In 1991 the laidback Bristol collective roused themselves to unleash their debut album. Reissued 21 years on it remains a landmark. Here, an early champion of the band recalls its making and its lasting influence”. Sean O’Hagan shares why Blue Lines is so important to him – and why it made such an impact:

“With the release of Blue Lines in 1991, Massive Attack were on a creative roll but seemed unaware of their impact or the shape of their future. I accompanied the group to Jamaica in early 1992 to write a feature for the Guardian around the filming of the Dick Jewell-directed video for their planned fifth single, Hymn of the Big Wheel, which featured the veteran reggae singer Horace Andy on lead vocals. In between filming, we visited Studio One, met the great reggae rhythm section Sly and Robbie, bought dozens of old and new reggae 45s, went to Prince Jammy's studio, crossed the hills to Ocho Rios, were held up by armed men at a roadblock and bonded over Appleton's rum and the inevitable bags of Jamaican spliff. Despite a budget of around 60 grand, no video ever appeared.

I met them, again, at the filming of another Baillie Walsh video for Be Thankful for What You've Got, which consisted of a stripper doing her act while miming the song in Raymond's Revue Bar in Soho, London. I sat with the group in the darkened auditorium, wondering what their role in the video was. They did not have one – unless you count the glimpse of a few shadowy figures exiting the strip club towards the end of the act. You can now see the video online but, unsurprisingly, it was never shown on MTV or the BBC. The group seemed unconcerned by these setbacks. They moved to their own unpredictable beat, so much so that I would not have put money on them still being with us today, so laidback was their attitude, so lackadaisical their work rate, so uninterested were they in press or promotion. But Massive Attack, against all the odds, are now seasoned survivors.

They are not, though, the Massive Attack that made Blue Lines. Tricky departed amid some rancour not long after the release of the album, as did Shara Nelson, their first and greatest singer, both claiming they had not been given enough recognition for their contributions to the Massive Attack sound. Since his extraordinary debut, Maxinquaye, Tricky has followed his own increasingly erratic path, while in a sad development Shara Nelson became deeply troubled and was last year given a 12-month community order for persistent harassment of the Radio 1 DJ Pete Tong, whom she claimed was her husband and the father of her child.

Other great guest vocalists worked with the group following Nelson's departure, beginning with Tracey Thorn on the title track of the group's equally brilliant second album, Protection, and erstwhile Cocteau Twin Liz Fraser on the hypnotic Teardrop from their third album, Mezzanine. Then Massive Attack splintered again when Mushroom, the great oddball musical genius behind those albums, departed for reasons that remain clouded in mystery but probably had something to do with the smalltown claustrophobia of the Bristol scene and the inevitable clashes of ego and direction that beset all great groups at some time or another. (I spoke to him by phone a few times last year when he was finishing his long-anticipated solo album but have not heard from him since. He seemed in good spirits.)

Massive Attack endure in the form of 3D, Daddy G and a proper group playing proper instruments that accompanies them when they play live. The collective ethos has been abandoned for something more rigid and functional.

The original idea that was Massive Attack – the collective, elastic, shape-shifting but essentially tight-knit, identity that helped make Blue Lines such a groundbreaking album has long since evaporated. The album, in all its newly polished glory, remains: a testament to a time when their vision was a truly collective one that challenged the notion of the pop group as well as the pop song. It still seems odd to me that the lumpen, guitar-fuelled Britpop years followed its release, the old order re-establishing itself in the most conservative fashion as if Blue Lines had never happened. Twenty-one years on, those guitars still sound old and all too familiar. Blue Lines, though, is like a blueprint for a different kind of pop future: stranger, richer, day-dreamier”.

Lets move on to PopMatters and their informative and illuminating feature. 1991 was a year where more than a few classics were released – including Nirvana’s Nevermind -, but there was something about Blue Lines that meant it created more of an impression than most of the best from that year. In terms of creating this movement or filling a void:

“Yet, while on the whole Blue Lines serves to uplift (swimming in sunshine, buoyed by the joys of its musical touchstones, along with the sweetening vocals of Shara Nelson and Horace Andy), as reportage the album often plumbs dark depths. Braggadocio aside, rap is fundamentally personal in comparison to pop’s clichéd prose. Yet for affecting a more intimate, sometimes almost whispered tone, Massive Attack brought rap in closer, transforming it to become inner-voice — in turn, revealing its men to be seemingly unsure of themselves at heart. Around every party and opened-top car cruise, the creeping fug of reefer-paranoia edges: the downside of free-living. Tempers are barely contained, lovers risk a beating for eggshells stepped on, and the nagging sense that drifting days spent out of work and in pursuit of local peer respect will eventually lead to undoing.

Musically, Massive Attack did more than echo dub; they built by its rules. For dub is all about space within the mix, allowing the rhythms and undulations of its repeats to reverberate. After all, dub is the music of — to quote from the group’s second album, Protection — “Jamaican aroma”, and stress and clutter just won’t do. So, while reggae’s influence is blatant on “One Love”, check out “Five Man Army” or the title track, where that genre’s defining rule — and one of music’s abiding truths — that’s it’s often what you don’t play that counts, holds sway.

As with classic hip-hop, Blue Lines indulged in sampling — those often mysterious, sometimes playful musical quotes and references; covert nods to those in the know. Piratical treasures, it would be impossible to secrete in our Google age, seemingly mapped free of the unknowable. More so, for the simple fact that, eight short months after Blue Lines, the landmark Grand Upright v. Warner copyright case made it law to seek pre-release clearance for — and therefore opened the door to huge fees payable on — sample use, which effectively priced samples beyond most acts’ recording budgets.

However, for all its underground thought and means, it cannot be overlooked that Blue Lines also marked a commercial shift in the relationship between dance music and the mainstream music industry. Previous to mid-1991, dance music had proven steadfastly immune to major label advances, instead choosing to run itself. Newly-affordable bedroom samplers and the role of handy backstreet vinyl-pressing shops (let alone the lax state of copyright laws) kept dance creatively nimble, self-produced, and (borderline trunk-of-the-car) independently distributed. All of which served to render it — irritatingly, for the majors — utterly self-sufficient.

Furthermore, dance music had always been about the 12″ single, not the preferred, higher mark-up, industry format of choice — the album. So when Blue Lines proved (along with Unknown Territory by Bomb the Bass and Seal’s first album, all released within months of each other) that dance music could if given the opportunity, creatively handle — but more importantly, sell — albums, the major labels were across the dance-floor in a shot. In short, no Blue Lines: no Leftfield, Chemical Brothers or Portishead’s Dummy. Fat of the Land by the Prodigy couldn’t have happened; Bjork’s Debut wouldn’t have come to pass. And it’s doubtful Norman Cook’s Fatboy Slim guise would have championed.

Looking back, it’s hard to fathom Blue Lines is 29 years old, simply because it remains relevant. 3D’s stencil-based sleeve-art still resonates; its nods to and progressive riffs on street-graffiti did much to legitimize that hotly-contested art-form, bridging the street-gallery divide over which Banksy would later cross. Furthermore, sonically, the album has yet to age, in the same weird way classics from any decade refuse to. Partially because the influence of dance and hip-hop still reverberates in our pop palettes two decades on; if not stylistically, then for modern pop production’s insistence on a heavy bottom-end — the rattling bass kick and boom of that distant Jamaican sound-system — which mainstream records lacked previously.

Granted, the album’s deployment of rap draws a line in history, previous to which it could never have emerged. Yet Blue Lines is timeless stuff. Massive Attack smartly pondered beyond that which rap, sadly, became too much about — the easy sway of machismo–in favor of life’s eternal concerns: doubt, sadness and the warmth of smiles; weakness and strength — and love. The same record-like cycles we all revolve through, but can never resolve; the conundrums to which great music becomes our antidote, the soothing balm — our accompaniment for the road.

As Oscar Wilde once assessed, “The moment you think you understand a great work of art, it’s dead for you.” To which, I can only conclude: long may Blue Lines mystify”.

I am going to end with Pitchfork and their positive review for Blue Lines. I do wonder if there will be any special celebration around its thirty-fifth anniversary. Massive Attack would go on to release other genius albums. I still think that their debut is their best offering. Such an incredibly powerful album. Not knowing much about the group, you are not sure what to expect from Blue Lines. It definitely created shockwaves in 1991:

“When Massive Attack first arrived, hip-hop in the UK was still figuring itself out. For years the scene there, such as it was, focused mainly on reproducing trends that had already fallen out of fashion by the time they made it across the Atlantic. That lack of identity was probably an asset for Massive Attack. They didn't have to compete against their contemporaries to see who could sample which Jimmy Castor Bunch break first, or worry about conforming to any outsider whose preconceptions about hip-hop authenticity might not include prog-rock samples or a lush chill-out anthem like "Unfinished Sympathy". Another asset was Neneh Cherry, whose Raw Like Sushi, which Del Naja and Vowles worked on, provided a genre-bending inspiration for Blue Lines, as well as a bankroll to record it. (Cherry even paid the group a salary and let them turn her kid's bedroom into an impromptu studio.)

In fact, those Raw Like Sushi credits (Vowles' for programming, Del Naja's for co-writing "Manchild") were the only real music-industry bona fides any of the principal contributors to Blue Lines had going into it, aside from vocalists Shara Nelson and roots reggae veteran Horace Andy. But somehow the group realized a remarkable and seamless sonic identity. That's clear from the arresting opener "Safe From Harm", which spins an aggressive drumbeat, Del Naja's rap, Nelson's soulful vocals, and a mist of sustained minor-key synths around an intimidatingly muscular bass loop. From that moment, every major part of the Massive Attack profile is already present, from the collaging of genres to the spacious, nocturnal sonic environment to the heavy dose of paranoia that permeates it all.

They spend the rest of the album exploring variations on these themes. "One Love," with Andy on vocals, has a digital dancehall feel, a creepy-funky electric piano riff, and a scratched sample of a blaring horn section that predates Pharoahe Monch's "Simon Says" by almost a decade. "Daydreaming", with its scratchy breakbeat drums, is more directly hip-hop than most of the rest of the album, but the layers of atmospheric synthesizers and Tricky's felonious near-whisper make it clear that Massive Attack was up to something entirely different from what every other rap producer at the time was doing.

Blue Lines brought producers around to its unique vision. By the time Massive Attack released Protection three years later, the group's renegade approach had been copied enough times to become a full-on movement. They'd go on to produce their masterpiece, Mezzanine, a couple of years after, but by then the project had already started to splinter. Tricky split from the collective after Protection to follow his own solo vision, while the core trio behind it would eventually burn out acrimoniously, with Vowles and then Marshall leaving Del Naja to produce increasingly less rewarding music under the group's name. Meanwhile, trip-hop in general had its edges polished off by genteel musicians who transformed it into soundtracks for fashionable hotel lobbies.

Still, that doesn't change the fact that Blue Lines was a startling record when it came out, and it remains one now. For this reissue it received a new mix and a new mastering job straight from the original tapes. It's available as a CD, in digital form in standard and high fidelity formats, and as a set of two LPs and a DVD of high resolution audio files. There aren't any bonus tracks, and aside from a reproduction promo poster in the vinyl edition there aren't any add-ons either. Frankly they'd just be a distraction from the underlying theme that becomes clear once you get absorbed into the music, which is that Blue Lines is still Blue Lines, and most of the world is still trying to catch up to it”.

On 8th April, it will be thirty-five years since Massive Attack’s Blue Lines came out. One of the best albums of all time, it is seen as landmark moment in music history. There are features such as this and this that provides even more detail and insight. Go and listen to this album in full and immerse yourself in its glory. One of those listening experiences you will not forget, Blue Lines has not aged and still reveals something new. You do not hear many Trip-Hop albums today, though I do feel artists need to nod more to Massive Attack and Blue Lines. It is a masterpiece that…

HAS the test of time.

FEATURE: Groovelines: Rage Against the Machine - Bulls on Parade

FEATURE:

 

 

Groovelines

Rage Against the Machine - Bulls on Parade

__________

THIS is one of these great songs…

IN THIS PHOTO: Rage Against the Machine in 1996/PHOTO CREDIT: Niels van Iperen/Getty Images

whose anniversary I could not pass by. Turning thirty on 1st April, Bulls on Parade is one of the defining songs from Rage Against the Machine. From the band’s second studio album, Evil Empire, which turns thirty on 16th April, Bulls on Parade deals with U.S. military aggression. Another song as relevant now as it was when it was when it was released. Highlighted and commended for its guitar solo containing a vinyl scratch effect used by Tom Morello, which was achieved by toggling between two pickups, one on and one off, while rubbing his hands on the strings over the pickups to create an effect akin to someone scratching a vinyl record. Thanks to the Wikipedia article for that information. You can see more here. A chart success upon its release, Bulls on Parade has been used in wider media. The New York Red Bulls use it as their goal song. There are these songs that represent something at the time in terms of culture and society. Others that do that but then are relevant through the years. That is the case with Bulls on Parade. It would be great if Rage Against the Machine would get back on stage together and perform the song. I want to get to a few features about Bulls on Parade. Music Radar told the story behind Bulls on Parade:

“By the time Morello and the rest of Rage hunkered down at Cole Rehearsal Studios in Hollywood, California with fast-rising producer Brendan O’Brien in the autumn of 1995, Morello was already being hailed as one of the most inventive and exciting guitarists to emerge in the post-Eddie Van Halen era. And he put every facet of his renegade skills to use on Bulls On Parade.

“We didn’t know it would be the first single when we started jamming on it,” said Morello, “but we realised quickly that it was a most potent piece of music. We recorded cassette demos as we wrote and jammed, and Brendan didn’t want to lose any energy as we worked. Our method of working was pretty much ‘jam, roll the cassette tape, then cut the real track’. Not a lot of time for overthinking and overtinkering.”

Morello remembered the song as a true group effort, with bassist Tim Commerford, who was listening to a lot of jazz at the time, coming up with the syncopated riff that kicks off the song. “Then I came up with the wah-wah guitar part [played through a Dunlop Cry Baby],” recalled Morello. “I also came up with the music underneath the verses – I was listening to a lot of Geto Boys back then, so I wanted something dark and sinister.”

Zack was responsible for the rhythmic swing that drives the chorus. “He comes up with guitar parts, too,” said Morello. “And Brad [Wilk] worked up that awesome, artillery marching beat. Hands were definitely on deck.”

Surprisingly, the knockout opening riff was at first intended as the song’s coda. “When Brendan heard it, he zeroed right in on it and said, ‘Why don’t you try beginning the song that way?’,” Morello recalled. “It was exactly what the song needed. That’s why he’s Brendan O’Brien.

By the time the band had laid down the basics, the track was well rehearsed. “Zack was still writing lyrics when we cut the main track,” says Morello. “But we knew all the changes and what we were doing.” The band recorded the rhythm track live, needing only a few takes to nail it. “We were pretty much a press-and-play band,” he says. “We rarely used click tracks. The instinctive speeding up or slowing down of a take can make it much more exciting.”

Throughout his career, Morello has relied on but a handful of one-of-a-kind guitars. For Bulls On Parade, he used his ‘Arm The Homeless’ S-style guitar, built from a Custom Performance body, a 22-fret Kramer Carrera neck with a locking nut, and outfitted with an EMG 81 in the bridge and an EMG 85 in the neck position.

“I used [it] on the entire song,” he explained, “and that includes the solo, which I improvised in the tracking room with headphones on. That was another toggle-switch workout, the ‘scritchy-scratch’ DJ part that I had previously worked into the live version of Bullet In The Head. I knew I wanted to find a home for it on record, and Bulls On Parade was the perfect place”.

The lead single from Evil Empire, I will write about the album closer to its anniversary. I want to move to this feature about Bulls on Parade. They tell how this song tells unsavoury truths that are relevant today. A timelessness that relates to every Rage Against the Machine song. Thirty years after its release – appropriately on April Fools Day -, Rage Against the Machine turned the spotlight on the fools in U.S. government in 1996 who were using war for their own ends and means. Bill Clinton was President in 1996:

“Bulls On Parade" fits right into Zack de la Rocha's poetic cannon with his statements against what the United State and the First World at large have become through continued feeding of the military-industrial complex. His start to the second verse lays out the point of view behind his contempt as clearly as any throughout the band's catalog:

Weapons, not food, not homes, not shoes

Not need, just feed the war cannibal animal

The fueling of the military comes at a cost, and it's a cost borne by the citizens back home. Their suffering is clear, but working to remedy it requires monetary resources governments seem unwilling to spend, despite how much it would assist their reputation and the country at large. The growing "rotten sore on the face of Mother Earth" mentioned in the first verse is thus twofold: in one part, it's continued warfare, frequently unprovoked, waged by the world's most powerful nations for gains that amount to finance over all else; in the other part, it's the continued plight of the common people on both sides of such conflicts.

Well, isn't that a fitting narrative considering the nature of the continued Russo–Ukrainian War? (And yes, it's an invasion and a war — the few nations which are refusing to call it such are at least implicitly supporting Russia, and likely more.) The ability to plop the lyrical backdrop of so many of RATM's tracks is a testament to their sociopolitical awareness and understanding of a world fueled by big militaries and even bigger money. The same is the case for de la Rocha's chorus cry: "Rally 'round the family with a pocket full of shells." Despite continued gun violence across America, both through civilian and police action, the right to bear arms has been upheld as a core American value, in line with antiquated "family" values that cater to the traditional White ruling class.

Whenever war breaks out, or a military exercise grabs the headlines, I find that "Bulls on Parade" captures the essence of the world's disillusioned masses. As the song's title evokes, world powers proudly display and unnecessarily use their prize military bulls while ignoring bigger issues on their home front. With this aspect of modern life embedded into the machinery of major political parties and international structures, the task of making lasting action against the military-industrial complex seems so futile that it seems all one can do in response is be angry about it (though I'm intrigued to see if that mindset changes in the wake of current conflicts if/when they eventually die down). Rage Against The Machine channeled that anger and turned it into what can be considered their sonic act of protest, with Brad Wilk's simple but effective drums keeping time and rhythmically accenting de la Rocha's rhymes and the combined melody and rhythm of Tom Morello's guitar and Brad Wilk's bass. Heck, Morello's turntable scratch-like guitar solo carries as bellicose a sound as any instrument from all of the 90s — it's a musical rebellion in addition to a political one.

For a sound that is as 90s as it gets, Rage Against The Machine have maintained their cultural importance through the perpetuity of the structures against which they fought. The thunderous sound and clear message of "Bulls on Parade" is a microcosm for their discography and all it and the band represent”.

I want to end with this feature from Interview Magazine, where Tom Morello was in conversation with Sarah Nechamkin. Although Morello talks more generally about music and politics, there is a mention of Bulls on Parade. I think this is one of the most powerful political songs ever released:

“SARAH NECHAMKIN: You have been on the forefront of social justice messaging in culture and music for decades. If you could describe the state of our country right now, in three words, what would those be?

TOM MORELLO: Can I have five? You can edit them together or make compound words if you want.

NECHAMKIN: Go ahead.

MORELLO: Chickens came home to roost. It comes from the fact that over the course of the last 35, 40 years, the neoliberal policies of both Democratic and Republican administrations have fucked over the middle class, have fucked over the working class, have greatly enriched the top .001 percent, and it has made a fertile field for right-wing demagogues to use the oldest trick in the book: divide and rule racism to gain power and potentially drive our planet into the abyss.

When I say “the abyss,” I don’t say that figuratively. We’re on the brink of this potential environmental catastrophe that will mean the destabilization of civilization like we’ve known it. And the current administration has its foot all the way down on the pedal. Leaving outside all of the xenophobia and the racism and all that crap, which is horrible, the fate of the planet is at stake.

NECHAMKIN: “Killing in the Name Of” anticipated a lot of that, and that was released during the Clinton administration. A lot of people are saying, “If we just get the Republicans out of the White House and take back our democracy…” What would you say to that? How do you think that we can move forward out of this cycle that’s been continuing long before our current moment and the rise of Trump?

MORELLO: People have fought and died hard for the right to vote, and I always vote. But the system that we have is absolutely rigged so that real fundamental systemic change is almost impossible. I worked as a scheduling secretary for United States Senator Alan Cranston for two years, and part of my scheduling job was to get him on the phone with rich people to ask them for money all fucking day long. If you think the way that sausage is made is bad, it’s worse. I’ve seen it. And so, the idea that there will be sort of a savior that will rise in the ranks of one of the two parties is, I think, farfetched. But the way that the world has always changed hasn’t come from above—progressive, radical, or revolutionary change always comes from below. And the world does not change itself, it takes you. The good news is that whenever it has changed, the people who have changed it are often people whose names are not in history books, and they’re people who don’t have any more courage, money, power, and influence than anyone reading this article. They’ve stood up in their place and time for a more just and decent planet. That’s the silver lining.

IN THIS PHOTO: Tom Morello

If the goal is to save the planet, to see that children have education, to see that countries have clean water, how do you do that? You don’t vote for the person that wants to eliminate all that, that’s one. But whoever is in office, it’s not enough to cast your ballot into the void once every four years. That’s not how change happens.

NECHAMKIN: I saw this quote in the “Bulls On Parade” video: “Free speech is like money. Some people just have a lot more of it than others.” I was watching the RNC last night …

MORELLO: To feel better about the world.

NECHAMKIN: Exactly. To ensure a nightmare-free sleep. But this emphasis on free speech and “cancel culture” seems to have really taken over the discourse in that world. How do you think that concept has been weaponized to serve certain interests?

MORELLO: Let me tell you, as a scheduler for a U.S. senator, I was in the business of buying free speech. The fact that the cornerstone of our democracy is how much money you can raise for television advertisements, that that is a major factor of who is elected and who doesn’t become elected is so ludicrous. Like, if we out-raise them by $50 billion so we can run more attack ads, that’s democracy functioning excellently right there. In my view, there’s only two positions on free speech. You’re either for it or you’re against it. I don’t want anybody censoring my speech, and so, I’m going to support anyone’s right to say whatever. Whatever the ridiculous fucked up thing they want to say, they’ve got the right to say it, because that’s how free speech works, or you don’t have it at all. Ted Nugent and I agree on free speech issues. But the biggest thing underlying that is advertising. How free speech expresses itself most is in creating false wants, via advertising, and then you fill that void by buying products. If you look at the pie chart of free speech, it’s not town hall meetings where we’re putting up a stop sign, or complaining about the dog-catcher. It’s making women feel insecure about their hair or making dudes feel insecure about their boners and then selling products to fill the void. That’s how free speech operates on a daily basis.

NECHAMKIN: So, when powerful people say they’re being censored by getting criticized on Twitter or whatever, do you think that’s really an issue of free speech?

MORELLO: I mean, if you’re being censored by people using their free speech to express an opinion, I don’t think you’ve got a leg to stand on”.

On 1st April, it will be thirty years since Rage Against the Machine released Bulls on Parade. After their eponymous 1992 album, Evil Empire was this next chapter. One of the band’s most popular songs, it holds new weight and significance in 2026. Under President Trump, there is this dictatorship of aggression and selfishness. Bulls on Parade very much tooled for today – sadly. Three decades after it came out, this incredibly powerful and potent song…

STINGS and cuts to the core.

FEATURE: The Perfect Take: Celebrating Rankin at Sixty

FEATURE:

 

 

The Perfect Take

IN THIS PHOTO: PJ Harvey, Woman of the Year, Q Magazine, 2001/PHOTOS: Rankin

Celebrating Rankin at Sixty

__________

I will get to an interview…

IN THIS PHOTO: Rankin (photo courtesy of TIN MAN ART)

with the man himself. We celebrate artists and albums, though how often do we really talk about music photographers? I feel they are crucial in terms of capturing artists and taking these fabulous shots that say as much as the music does. In terms of the most established, legendary, respected and talented, few can match Rankin. You can see his work here, as he is still photographing artists and capturing these fabulous moments. Whether a portrait or at an award show, you get something different you do not get with other photographers. As Rankin, born John Rankin Waddell, turns sixty on 28th April, I wanted to celebrate him here. Bring in a few of his best shots. Before discussing an exhibition from 2024 that marked thirty years of his amazing photography, here is some biography around one of the greatest music photographers ever:

“His works are controversial, and therefore interesting, sometimes attractively scandalous, which causes close attention from connoisseurs of photography, professionals and admirers. Some call them banal and vulgar, others brilliant.

You may not know the name, but you've definitely seen his work. Rankin is arguably Britain's most successful export to the fashion industry and one of the world's leading photographers.

You probably won't be familiar with his face or his name, but Rankin, real name John Rankin Waddell, has left a mark on the history of fashion photography and magazines, becoming one of the most important British photographers.

Along with Jefferson Hack, he's the founder of Dazed and Confused Magazine, a cutting-edge publication, characterised by a unique and inimitable aesthetic, the result of Rankin's taste. The photographer is moreover the founder of Hunger, a biannual publication focusing on fashion and culture. Throughout his career, Rankin has shot the most famous celebs and top models of our time, as well as directed a number of music videos.

Despite the fact that the "Dazed & Confused" and "Hunger" founder doesn't think of himself as a fashion photographer.

Rankin was born John Rankin Waddell in Glasgow. His family moved to North Yorkshire following a promotion for his dad, then on to St Albans, where Rankin spent his teenage years. Seeing his output and passion for capturing images of people, you might expect him to have been immersed in art and culture from a young age, but it wasn’t something his parents were interested in, he says.

“I didn’t take any photographs till I was about 20 not because I didn’t want to, I just didn’t have any connection to that type of stuff at all. My first camera was a Ricoh.”

At school, he was good at maths so accountancy was a logical path for him to follow and his parents were happy he was going to get a proper job. But they were dismayed when he dropped out of Brighton Polytechnic and went on a photography course. His dad didn’t speak to him for 18 months but they rebuilt their relationship when he had to return to live at home. 

“This shoot day was exceptional because it was at Buckingham Palace. I got a very short amount of time with her, about five minutes. I’d done my research and the main thing for me was I really wanted to get a shot of her smiling, so my focus was on that.”

Rankin has always seen photography as a way to stimulate conversation, something accessible for everybody to understand and love. He rejects pretension with straight up, humour driven concepts that poke fun at fashion and advertising, whilst working within the mediums.

IN THIS PHOTO: Sam Smith, Spectre, Writing’s on Tte Wall, 2015

Rankin has published over forty photobooks including Female Nudes (1999), Rankin Male Nudes (2000), Breeding: A Study of Sexual Ambiguity (2004), and Beautiful (2007).

“I realised quickly that I was really good at making people feel comfortable when I was taking their photograph. People are embarrassed in photographs and they feel uncomfortable, so if you’re not fuelling that, you’re displacing it… bursting the bubble.

Rankin made his name in publishing, founding the seminal monthly magazine Dazed & Confused with Jefferson Hack in 1992. It provided a platform for innovation for emerging stylists, designers, photographers and writers.

In 2001, Jefferson and Rankin launched AnOther Magazine. With a focus on fashion, originality, and distinction. In response to the expanding menswear market, in 2005 AnOther Man was introduced, combining intelligent editorial with groundbreaking design and style.

In November 2011, Rankin returned to magazine publishing with a fresh offering - The Hunger. A biannual fashion, culture and lifestyle magazine, The Hunger and its associated Hunger TV website - a video-based digital platform featuring in-depth interviews, fashion films, blogs, updates, and previews - marked Rankin's return to the fashion world with an understanding that the future is not only printed but digital too.

For Rankin, inspiration is everywhere. Rankin loves photography and classic photographers. Rankin’s fascination with photography is nurtured by his commercial work, where he breaks taboos of genres and tries something different.

During his career, a charismatic talanted photographer has published over forty photobooks. And definitely one of the most interesting and provocative of them is F*ck Y*u Rankin (2014).

Giving the finger, flipping the bird, up yours! For hundreds of years the middle finger has been the wordless insult of choice for people the world over – regardless of what phraseology you choose to accompany it. And it’s this age-old sign that Rankin has chosen to focus on in his provocative book.

IN THIS PHOTO: Spice Girls, From Behind, Big Issue, 1997

Known for his tongue-in-cheek humour, Rankin is used to the odd insult, and has been goading celebrities into giving him the finger for years. But it was a particular shot he had taken of Heidi Klum flipping the bird, published in a book, then ripped off by enterprising T-Shirt manufacturers that made this image iconic and planted the seed for what was later to become F*ck Y*u.

“The first time I saw someone wearing the t-shirt was when I was dropping my son off at school. The crazy point for me was going on holiday to Thailand, it felt like every other person was wearing one of my photos of Heidi giving me the finger!”

If photography is Rankin’s first love, then film is the lifelong relationship that he has developed and nurtured. This deep-rooted passion has led him to direct a feature film, tons of commercials, music videos, fashion films for some of the world’s biggest names.

In 2011 Rankin founded RANKIN FILM as a production company to represent him as a solo director of bespoke content for a multitude of platforms. Through RANKIN FILM, Rankin has directed dynamic and contemporary film projects for brands such as Nike, Neutrogena, L’Oreal, The British Fashion Council, Coco de Mer, and music videos for stars like Tinie Tempah, Rita Ora, and Kelis.

In recent years, Rankin has developed a strong sensorial style that has led him to move beyond fashion and beauty and into the genres of automotive, dance, and even confectionary content. This includes high profile brands such as Aston Martin, Mercedes, and Godiva.

Between 2002 and 2009, Rankin co-directed commercials, music videos and short films with Chris Cottam, including their debut feature film, The Lives of Saints. It won the Grand Jury prize at the Salento International Film Festival.

Always in step with the prevailing cultural zeitgeist, Rankin is an acclaimed photographer whose commercial images create disruptive campaigns for top global brands and whose unmistakable personal work regularly ascends to iconic status.

His is synonymous with cutting-edge portraits, his lens capturing the cultural and political figures of our age. His images have adorned the covers of Elle, Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar, Esquire, GQ and Rolling Stone. He is equally well known for his advertising shots for the film, fashion and beauty industry.

He is equally well known for his advertising shots for the film, fashion and beauty industry. He has published magazines, more than 30 books, exhibited regularly in galleries around the world and has his own gallery in London. And his client list reads like a Who’s Who of pubic life in the UK and beyond. In short, he has a clear view from the topmost branches of the photography industry.

A tireless entrepreneur, publisher, filmmaker, and mentor, his work is published worldwide and is exhibited in galleries including MoMA, New York, and the Victoria & Albert museum, London”.

Of course, Rankin is not only a music photographer, though I think many associate him primarily with his shots of artists. In terms of the all-time great music photographers, he is up there with the likes of Ross Halfin, Danny Clinch, Annie Leibovitz, Bob Gruen, Mick Rock, and Anton Corbijn. In 2024, at TIN MAN ART, Cromwell Place, SW7, there was this amazing exhibition where the public got to look at his transformative and timeless photography in the flesh. This article charts the career of a photographer who is still producing some of the best shots out there:

“Responsible for some of the most iconic editorial shoots and album artwork of the 1990s and 2000s, Rankin has photographed the biggest British bands, including Pulp and Radiohead, pop superstars such as the Spice Girls and Dua Lipa, and cult heroes like Michael Stipe and PJ Harvey. Over a carefully curated selection of portraits, Sound Off showcases Rankin’s ability to create images that came to define the zeitgeist, as well as exploring the personalities behind each musician’s persona.

Rankin’s art has always been part of the music scene, beginning with the seminal magazine Dazed & Confused, which he set-up with Jefferson Hack in 1990. The magazine was a central part of the cultural renaissance that swept through 90s Britain, placing provocative images alongside the music, art and fashion that defined a decade. Embracing a DIY culture, the magazine was embedded in the night-club scene and featured both established stars such as David Bowie and Debbie Harry, as well as breakthrough acts like Robbie Williams and Oasis.

Music is also a vital component of Rankin’s photographic practice, with shoots usually accompanied by a loud soundtrack. Rankin’s aim has always been to give some of the power of the photographer over to the subject. By playing music and creating a unique and personal atmosphere in his studio, this honest and open approach creates space for the subject to be themselves.

Sound Off allows viewers to understand the challenges that are presented when photographing iconic figures.

IN THIS PHOTO: Keith Richards, Smokey Keith, 2002

As Rankin explains of shooting Debbie Harry,

You really have to try and push every image you’ve seen of her out of your mind when you photograph her. Everyone has seen hundreds of amazing pictures of her, you have to make a real effort to be different.

In a career that has seen him photograph everyone from royalty to rock stars, it is this ability to capture both the public and private personas that has struck chord with viewers.

As Rankin notes,

I get asked all the time what celebrities are really like. My mantra now is “They’re just people too”.

TIN MAN ART’s gallery at Cromwell Place is a fitting location to showcase this selection of Rankin portraits, particularly as the exhibition follows two sold-out shows featuring artworks by one of the photographer’s most famous subjects, Radiohead’s Thom Yorke, who presented his ‘The Crow Flies’ series of landscapes, created in collaboration with artist Stanley Donwood, with TIN MAN ART last year. One of Rankin’s favourite portraits of Radiohead is included in the show.

RANKIN: Sound Off – Musicians 1990-23 charts the career of a photographer at the zenith of his art, one who was originally inspired by the album art of his childhood, and has since captured some of the most celebrated musicians of his time.

Rankin comments:

Going back through my archive, the funniest thing that struck me was how many of these images the artists didn’t like at the time. Their hair was out of place, they didn’t like the concept of the shoot, they didn’t like me. But now, how perfectly those images seem to embody who they were. It’s as if all of the little bits that make a shoot—the hair, makeup, styling—come together to codify a career through imagery.

TIN MAN ART director James Elwes comments:

Rankin’s visionary photography and publishing has transfixed music lovers for 30 years. The works in this show empower and iconise an array of musical artists—for me, there are moments where we see pop transcend into folklore”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Radiohead, OK Computer, 1997

I will end with a couple of interviews. The first is from FAD from 2024. They spoke with Rankin about the superb ‘SOUND OFF’ exhibition. I am sad that I did not go to that. I would like to think that there will be a photobook or coffee table book soon where we get a selection of his photos and commentary. A documentary around his work and words from artists who have worked with him. A tribute to this legendary photographer:

“We are connecting over your forthcoming exhibition ‘SOUND OFF’ with TIN MAN ART, focusing on musical portraits between 1990 and 2023. How did the collaboration come about?

Through Mark Westall – someone I have known for over 30 years, he set up his magazine Gspot around the same time as Jefferson Hack and I set up Dazed & Confused, and he has always maintained this opinion that I should be working more in the exhibition space. He introduced me to James Elwes, the founder of TIN MAN ART.

The problem with being a commercial photographer is that you really do move from one commission to another and despite having done eight international museum shows, I am regarded in a very different light outside the UK than I am within it.

I’m not sure people who know you as a photographer necessarily know that you set up Dazed & Confused magazine in 1990 and are equally successful in publishing as photography. Can you tell me more about your relationship to the printed image vs. the image on the printed page?

I think the best way to describe it is to look at how I have formed my career. I did my first exhibition of printed work in the Curzon Cinema in Soho during my first year BA, followed by a show at the Collection Gallery at the end of my second year – so I have always exhibited my work, and I featured more in group shows as I became better known. I have always felt that seeing my work in a show or a gallery is the ultimate goal.

Exhibitions are such an amazing opportunity to show the quality of the photographs. And because I don’t shoot on small cameras, prints can be blown up to the size of a billboard and still retain the same quality. At the same time, what I have always loved about photography is the democratisation of it, and the idea that when you shoot the Spice Girls you can have millions of fans tear it out of whatever it is printed in and put it up on their wall. I love these two sides to print and printing – they are both as important as each other. When you are making a show the whole rhythm of it is different to when you are making a magazine. Each allows you to play with scale in different ways. Both are important – they’re symbiotic. 

Through Dazed and its related media, you have surrounded yourself with creative people who are trying to push the boundaries of image and art-making across different forms. Where does that rebellious spirit come from in you?

It comes from being a contrarian. I was brought up in Glasgow and “why” was my favourite question when I was a four-year-old – my parents really encouraged that. That is a very Glaswegian, Scottish thing, to be genuinely inquisitive. When I first went to college, I picked up a student magazine at the college door and when I asked who made it, the person said “We made it”. That was a revelation for me. In the past, because of my background, which was very working class, people who made adverts and art were “them”, and suddenly I saw that I could be “them”; it could be me, we. In the early 1990s, I kept saying that we needed to push the boundaries, we needed to challenge our audience, the reader, and the wider photographic establishment. And I think in a sense that comes from being a kind of Scottish contrarian but also from studying photography as an art form and the social and anthropological implications of what photography means.

How else did your time at The London College of Printing influence your practice?

I learnt a lot at college and I wanted to go and apply that to photography, but in a way that was accessible. Fashion was very seductive and it was easy to be challenging with it. I am very influenced by the body politic movement, and that definitely came into my work, but in a much more accessible way.

One of the reasons I didn’t really fit in at college is that I felt it was a bit of a bubble and the work was being created for a small audience. I wanted to create work that was for a much wider audience that could actually have an impact. There was an intent to it all – I didn’t go into it wanting to be a fashion photographer. I was influenced by conceptual art and I could see that if we brought that to portraiture and fashion, it could create a new way of looking at that world, something far beyond its surface seduction. That is why a lot of my photographs have an underlying confrontation to the subject. I am using a wide angle lens, I am very close to them, I am asking them to look through the lens to the audience, not trying to be cool. That is why my shots of Bowie are not very cool – they are much more playful, and a bit funny because that was how I was seeing him.

IN THIS PHOTO: Michael Stipe, Revolution in the Head, Dazed & Confused, Issue 68, 2000

As well as photographing musicians, you have also directed music videos; music clearly plays an important part in your life. Are there any portraits that are particularly meaningful to you?

The Rolling Stones, who are possibly my favourite band ever. Shooting them was amazing because I went to see them at Wembley when I was 16 – I went hooky from school and 20 years later I was photographing then. While my father wanted me to be an accountant, he did encourage me to do what I want. He let me break the rules, and let me skip school that day. The band are known for breaking the rules, I broke the rules to see them play, and then I got to photograph them – it completed the circle. It was like photographing a bunch of 18-year-old boys. That photograph means the most to me. Then David Bailey phoned me up and said “I fucking love that picture of the Stones”.

In looking at the earlier images in the show, I wonder if you think you could take the same kind of photograph of, say, Kylie today. What change have you experienced over the years in access to celebrity?

It is entirely different, but also exactly the same when you work with an artist who is engaged with what you are making. Kylie, Dua Lipa, Bowie, U2 – all were entirely engaged. When you shoot Kylie, there is an understanding that she respects the collaboration and has an expectation that you will succeed. There is an innate sense of it being something you do together. Actors have much more protection around them than musicians. Because they are essentially playing characters, they don’t really like showing themselves. That is why some of my better photographs of actors are of them playing up to the camera. However, a musician is a volume-controlled version of themselves. Even now, with people like Dua, she understands that. There is also a vulnerability to being a musician that comes through in photography. 

Much of your work is studio based, which doesn’t always give you a great deal to work with. How do you draw personality out of your sitters?

Very rarely do I go with a pre-conceived idea. Right from the very beginning, my idea was to collaborate with my sitters to almost make it a dramatic piece as opposed to trying to capture something. I 100% worked on the basis that if you shoot against something that hasn’t got any distraction then the focus is the person. That was very much the opinion of Richard Avedon, Irving Penn and David Bailey – huge influences on me in that regard. My whole approach is about saying to the person;

“We make this together. I am not going to use a picture that we don’t love together”.

And that allows me to push them, and because I was allowed to push them, I got more out of them. And when digital came along, I loved it and thought it was brilliant because it meant I could really collaborate, by showing them images as we work. The idea of photographers capturing something I find strange – I don’t get it.

Your catalogue of achievements is considerable in a career spanning three decades; you have shot major fashion campaigns, run multiple creative publications and agencies, you make films and books as well as regularly undertaking charitable work. What drives you?

It is the working-class spirit that drives me. I used to compare myself to some artists and wonder why I didn’t go down the same road, I came from a very similar place to some of the YBAs, but I think I was scared of failure and the opportunity to have a career and make money was important. I am very much influenced by my dad – he was someone that did well but always reminded me that you might not always have a house or a living.

Then, from around 2006 I stopped worrying about where my work stood. My biggest competition is with myself and wanting to be better and better. Also I have defied a lot of the conventions on how people run their careers and I attribute that to my parents giving me the confidence to reinvent myself.

Finally, what is the musical portrait you wish you had taken?

One of my favourites is David Montgomery’s photograph of Mick Jagger, which was done for Sticky Fingers and it is the most amazing photograph of Mick ever taken – he is naked holding the album cover in front of him. I bought a print of it because I just love it so much. I think David Montgomery is one of the most unheralded photographers of his generation – that picture was so brilliantly vulnerable, sexy and confident at the same time. It is a very brilliant image of a person at the height of his talent.

I work on the Abbey Road Music Photography Awards and I am always really excited to see what the young photographers are doing. Photography represents the music in a way that movies and films can’t really do – it’s very pure”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Dua Lipa for Hunger Magazine in 2016

Approaching sixty, the scene must be very different now for Rankin. In terms of the demand for photography and how it is taken. The influence of A.I. must be quite intense and troubling. Nativee spoke with Rankin last year about “AI and the future of image making with the legendary portrait photographer and magazine founder”. Whilst a lot of his generation of photographers might stick with the classics and not look at A.I. or discuss it, when it comes to Rankin “over the last year he has thrown himself willingly into the synthetic abyss to create FAIK, a real-life exhibition and actual physical paper-based magazine which looks at this artificial intelligence malarkey head-on”.

“For a bit of context I suppose, when you started being a professional photographer and making magazines in the early 90s, what was the process then compared to now? What were the kind of conversations going on then about what was fresh and new?

Well, we in a way bust the doors down on independent publishing. By the 90s there were only a few independents out there and we were very influenced by Andy Warhol’s Interview and by what the guys at The Face and iD were doing and what they did with Oz or Nova in the 60s—and desktop publishing technology allowed us to smash it down and go for it.

On the first day I went to college, I got the college magazine and I immediately became part of the student union that made that magazine, because I could suddenly see that I could make a magazine—that was a revelation. In a way I studied photography, but I studied magazine publishing in parallel and that allowed me to become a publisher. I always treated the magazine like a kind of art piece—like a Trojan horse that can go out into the world as this thing that you can hold and read, that has art in it.

In a way we started a bit of a revolution with a few other magazines in terms of representation, identity, identity politics, conceptual fashion, conceptual photography or art photography mixing with commercial photography. We wanted to put meaning and creative substance into a medium which had become mass produced and was almost pervasive in its kind of emptiness. We tried to put some art into that.

And everything I’ve done since then has been influenced by the fact that we were successful in making something that was a challenger in that period, and I don’t think I’ve ever really swayed away from that really. FAIK has a direct thread back to what I was doing back at that time.

“We wanted to put meaning and creative substance into a medium which had become mass produced and was almost pervasive in its kind of emptiness.”

Back then I couldn’t afford to build a set—but now you don’t have to. There was such a glass ceiling around the financial side of photography—even becoming a photographer cost a lot of money back then. I had to work three jobs when I was studying, just to earn enough money to pay for film and processing and all that stuff. And I think that’s gone—and that’s great. There’s been this democratisation of image making now—the playing field is very flat now and everybody’s starting off at the same point.

That means that you’re going to see work by extraordinary people whose minds might not have been able to explore this stuff, and I think that that’s what we tried to challenge back when we were starting. We might not have been rich, but we were coming at it like we were. We were culturally rich or confidence rich—and there’s no barrier to that anymore.

It’s suppose it’s like with music producers and how you don’t need a studio anymore. 20 years from now, what’s going on with photography? Does it still exist, or by that point are people just conjuring?

I think it does—I think there will be real photography and there will be real photographers who make pictures and the fact there’s a camera in everyone’s pocket means that people are still going to keep taking pictures. And real photography by masters of the craft will exist because I think that type of stuff lives out in any media or medium. I think, as you said, that it will be seen as having value that’s beyond what any of this stuff can do—but I think there will also be a place for this other thing. I think that authenticity will be valued very highly but I also think that it will be a rocky road for the next at least ten years before it balances itself out.

And I’m kind of up for the fight—I’m not shirking away from this stuff. I’m a photographer, I take pictures every day, I love taking pictures and I’m not scared of this AI stuff, I’m in it, I’m bending it to my will with a really vast knowledge of photography. I’ve got this curatorial ability to make work that’s much more realistic and has a theme and has consistency—I’m not doing fantasy, I think the fantasy element to it is a little bit ridiculous.

Yeah—the stuff I’ve seen is very much down the fantasy angle.

It’s also got loads of inbuilt biases.

Definitely. It always has the same look to it with that weird hyper-real sheen. But I imagine in a few months’ time it’ll be wound down a notch so it’s not so obvious.

You can say to it that you want to create a series of images like Diane Arbus—you can ask for it to give me 15 prompts to create a series. And maybe you want those images to be based on Hackney right now—to feature real people from Hackney. And it will create a series of Diane Arbus’s pictures shot in Hackney, and it can modernise them to make them feel like they look like they’re shot now. But I wouldn’t go to Midjourney and ask it that—I would go to ChatGPT, ask it to do the prompts, and then I’d go from the prompts to Midjourney to create it, or I’d go to Sora and create it immediately, and then I’d go from Sora to Midjourney to recreate it…

But does it kind of suck though? I know it can create the final image—but those Diane Arbus photos were good because they actually happened. She was a real person who went out everyday and took those photos. There’s a story there.

Yeah, of course.

I always think about Fitzcarraldo. That’s a crazy film—and they really did that—they really got that boat over that hill. If it was just made on computers, film students wouldn’t be sitting talking about it three in the morning. The real story is what makes it good.

And I think that that’s another thing that I haven’t actually said to you—one of the other things that I’ve been doing when I’ve been creating these sculptures is that I’ve been trying to write about why I’ve made them, as opposed to just pressing the button. Why did I make these? Why have I made these parodies on filters and death and, you know, all these themes that have been running through my work for 30 years? But my point is not that, my point is that most people won’t care.

So, yeah, and it’s like, do they just want the end bit—the final product?

Yeah—a mate of mine sent me a film that was all done with AI, but it had this really weird meaning to it. It was almost an art film, but made with AI, and it gave it credibility and credence. It goes back to art—what’s the best art for you as a creative—I think that’s something that makes you feel and think something. Now if anything can do that, then it’ll have the power.

If you ask me why I take photographs, it’s because they’re a capsule of something that goes out into the world, and they touch other people, and make them see the world the way that I’ve seen it, and I’ve understood it. And you can still do that with an AI image. I think people will kind of reverse into it.

It’s already happening in a really naff way—like where people might make a ‘making of’ film of an AI film—and it looks like it’s a real ‘making of’. At the moment people are saying, “look at what I did with AI—look at how good I am at this,” because they’re trying to get work out of it. But very soon it’ll tip over and they’ll stop telling you that it’s AI.

I suppose soon we’ll be beyond the conversation, and it’ll just be like, “This is just work”, in the same way someone used Photoshop, or someone used a digital camera, they don’t have to tell everyone first. That thing of whether it was AI or not will be kind of irrelevant.

There was a study done recently—they showed 109 images of human beings to 150 people and told them that around half of them were AI, and then asked them to work out which ones were real, and which ones weren’t. Around 44% of the photos were judged to be AI—but they were all real! So, the minute you use the word AI, people are already looking for it”.

I wanted to celebrate the incredible Rankin ahead of his sixtieth birthday on 28th April. The experience of having your photo taking by Rankin must stay with you for life. As he enters his seventh decade, let’s hope that we see many more incredible photos from one of the finest photographers ever. It is his music photography that especially interests me and I wanted to focus on here. There are a lot of photographers whose work I really love – including modern music photographers like Phoebe Fox -, but when it comes to Rankin, few can match…

HIS photos.

FEATURE: This Is the Right Time: Lisa Stansfield at Sixty

FEATURE:

 

 

This Is the Right Time

Lisa Stansfield at Sixty

__________

ONE of my favourite artists…

IN THIS PHOTO: Lisa Stansfield in 1989/PHOTO CREDIT: Chris van de Vooren/Sunshine/Rex

turns sixty on 11th April. The Manchester-born icon Lisa Stansfield is responsible for incredible tracks like This Is the Right Time, All Woman, The Real Thing, and Change. I think one of my earliest, and happiest, musical memories is hearing All Around the World at Christmas in a local shopping centre. An incredible actor too, ahead of her sixtieth birthday, I want to shine a light on her music. Before getting to a mixtape at the end of this feature, I want to bring in some biography about the wonderful Lisa Stansfield. For that, I am turning to this brilliant website:

“Britain has produced some of the world's best-loved divas over the past four decades - but few, if any, have been as soulful as Lisa Stansfield.

Lisa is not your typical glitzy diva. In fact, the word prima donna doesn't fit the down-to-earth honesty that characterises the girl from Rochdale, Lancashire, North West England, who has sold more than 20 million albums worldwide.

Lisa Jane Stansfield was born at the Crumpshall Hospital in Manchester, England, on 11th April 1966. She is the middle of two sisters, Karen the eldest by three years and Suzanne who is four years younger than Lisa. They grew up in the town of Heywood in Greater Manchester, then by the age of 12, Lisa's parents Keith and Marion moved the family to the nearby town of Rochdale. 
​Her early musical tastes and influences came from the Motown era and soul music to the likes of Marvin Gaye, Diana Ross, Aretha Franklin and Barry White. Lisa soon realised she wanted to become a singer from a young age and she was already singing at local working men’s clubs in her early teens.

It didn't take too long before Lisa who was barely 14 years old, got her big break after she entered and won a local talent contest "Search For A Star" which was sponsored by the Manchester Evening News at the Willows Club in Salford. This opportunity led to her first recording contract.

In 1981 at the age of 15, she recorded and released her first single called, "Your Alibis".  Subsequently Lisa got signed to Polydor and between 1982 and 1983 she released a handful of singles. None of them charted. However, around the same time Lisa was invited to co-host a UK based TV music show called Razzamatazz where she appeared as a co-presenter for a couple of series. Although it was a well paid job, Lisa believed that nobody would ever take her seriously as a singer if she continued presenting for the longterm and decided to leave the show to continue her career as a singer.

Along the way she met Augusto Grassi, an Italian costume designer on a holiday in Tunisia. In 1987 they got married at Sacred Hearts Catholic Church in Rochdale and Lisa moved to live with him in Italy on a hilltop town called Zagarolo outside of Rome. However Lisa was really in-love with the idea of Italy rather than her husband and after sixteen weeks, she realised that their marriage was over.

Lisa moved backed to Rochdale and met up with her former school friend Ian Devaney (who was soon to become her fella) and his friend Andy Morris. Several years prior on a chance meeting, Ian and Andy convinced Lisa to write some songs. This led them to form a band together , they called themselves "Blue Zone". They made a demo which was sent around to several record labels. Their chance came when a small independent label called Rockin' Horse signed them (which later got taken over by Arista). Blue Zone's first two singles were unsuccessful, however their third started to make some waves. It was 'Thinking about His Baby' with the b-side 'Big Thing'. Kiss-FM and the club scene picked up on 'Big Thing' and went on to sell over 10,000 copies in one week. Their album which took over a year to complete created a stir without charting.

Lisa's major breakthrough came in 1989 when Morris and Devaney, both brass players, were recruited for a Coldcut session. Lisa went along just for fun and was asked to provide guest vocals on the group's new single, "People Hold On". The song became an instant dance hit and reached number 11 in the UK charts. On the strength of its success, Lisa was persuaded to try her luck as a solo artiste and the threesome decided to drop the band name and Blue Zone eventually became "Lisa Stansfield"

They were now signed to Arista Records - and things started moving rapidly when the next single release, "This Is The Right Time", became a top 20 hit in the UK.  A few months later came Lisa's most infamous anthem "All Around The World". This was to become her first UK number one hit and still remains the biggest selling single and her most well known track to date.

"All Around the World" opened the doors to Lisa's success overseas and gave her the first taste of success in the US where, in addition to topping the pop charts, it also headed the R&B charts - making her only the second white artiste to score such a distinction. Her first album as a solo artiste, "Affection" was released in November 1989 and went onto sell over 5 million copies worldwide. To cap a spectacular first year off as a solo artiste, Lisa was at number one for the second time on the charity single with Band Aid 2,with Do They Know Its Christmas.

In February 1990 she won a BRIT award for Best Newcomer, while All Around The World won an Ivor Novello award for Best Contemporary Song. By then, her debut album, Affection, had topped the charts on both sides of the Atlantic. Lisa was also nominated for a Grammy awards in the categories of Best Female Pop Vocal Performance and Best New Artist.

As they toured around the globe promoting Affection, Lisa continued writing new music together with Ian and Andy. Whilst their second album began to take shape. Lisa was asked to perform at the 2nd Rock In Rio festival in Brazil in January '91. Several more charity based concerts followed that year which included a concert for Kurdish Refugees, an AIDS Benefit show for Red Hot & Dance and UK's Amnesty Int. Big 20 Concert.

In November 1991, the fans were treated to a new, more sophisticated look and sounding Lisa with her second album "Real Love". With a run of several hit singles, which included Change, Set your Loving Free, All Woman, Time To Make you Mine and A Little More Love it was no surprise that in 1992 to the delight of her global fan base she won her third BRIT award .

With this followed an invitation to write a song for The Bodyguard soundtrack which resulted in Someday (I'm Coming Back), a top 10 hit in its own right, as well as securing her place on the biggest-selling soundtrack of all time (which has sold over 200 million records).

Lisa continued to tour in Europe, Asia and the United States.  She also grabbed pole position the UK pop charts in in April 1993 with the charity EP called 'Five Live' in conjunction with George Michael and the iconic British rock group, Queen. The record stemmed from her appearance with Michael at The Freddie Mercury Tribute Concert at Wembley in April 1992. It remains a personal highlight of her years in the music business, with over 100,000 people attending with some of the worlds biggest artists.

"So Natural" was the third studio album released in November 1993, recorded at Windmill Lane Studios, also known as the "U2 studio" in Dublin, Ireland. It got to number six in the UK charts. However The album was not commercially released in North America. It also saw the last contribution of Andy Morris who had co-written three songs for this album together with Lisa and Ian.

That same year Lisa and Ian took the decision to move from Rochdale to Ireland for what seemed to be a quieter life and to get away from the celebrity glare. They bought a six-bedroom Victorian house (with its own recording studio) located in the picturesque Dublin suburb of Dalkey on Ireland`s east coast. During this period, they made several appearances on several film soundtracks and compilations.   

It took four years before the release of the fourth studio eponymous album in 1997, "Lisa Stansfield".  It featured covers of Barry White's "Never, Never Gonna Give You Up" and Phyllis Hyman's "You Know How to Love Me." The album was produced by Devaney and Peter Mokran. It performed well on the charts peaking at number two in the United Kingdom as well as in forty other European countries and in the United States.

In the summer of 1998, Lisa and Ian eventually took the plunge and got married at an intimate ceremony which took place in Washington Park Square, New York. 

During the same year, Lisa accepted her first major acting role. She worked together with director Nick Mead making her film debut in a British romantic comedy called "Swing" which was released in May 1999. Together with Ian, they wrote, recorded and produced a compilation of ten songs for the film soundtrack.

Lisa's fifth studio album, "Face Up" was released in 2001 which spurned two singles "Lets Just Call It Love" and "8.3.1".  This album also featured the song writing and vocal talents  of Richard Darbyshire from the 80's band  Living In a Box.

The following year Lisa accepted another acting role making her West End debut in The Vagina Monolgues.  In 2003 Lisa completed her contractual obligation to Arista/BMG by releasing Biography the re-mastering of The Greatest Hits. The album sold well enough for BMG to re-master her entire album catalogue with a limited edition of the "Complete Collection".

A desire to break the mould from her previous blend of soul and R&B, Lisa decided to go down the pop route and signed to Trevor Horn's ZTT record label in 2004. He produced "The Moment" subsequently releasing two singles "Treat Me Like a Woman" and "If I Hadn't Got You." However, at the time the album was not regarded commercially successful in the UK as Lisa's previous efforts, in spite of the European tour which followed in 2005 was a complete sellout.

Lisa switched back into acting and some further rolls followed. In late 2006 she appeared in an UK TV drama series, Goldplated. In 2007 she appeared in another television series, Agatha Christie's, Marple as the character Mary Durrant in the episode titled 'Ordeal by Innocence'. She also dubbed over one of the characters voices (Millie, an elf) for the English version of the Finnish animated film "Quest for a Heart" and also recorded the title song by the same name.

Lisa's friend & film director John Maybury offered her a role as Ruth Williams in another film called  "The Edge of Love" which starred Keira Knightley, Sienna Miller, Cillian Murphy and Matthew Rhys. The film premiered in June 2008 and was received well at the box office.

Having lived in Dalkey (a suburb of Dublin) Ireland since 1993, Lisa and Ian eventually sold their house and moved to London.

In 2008 Lisa and Ian teamed up together with Nick Mead on a documentary about the Roma community. It followed their journey over five days across Europe from London to Aushwitz, following a contemporary gypsy woman's compulsion to visit her roots and discover her historical past. A tragedy where 80% of Romany gypsies were murdered at the hands of the Nazis during World War 2. They additionally spent much time documenting their travels with Britain's travelling community and Lisa wrote about her experiences in the Tribune Magazine in November 2010. They hope to release this project in the near future.

In 2009 Lisa and Ian collaborated once again with Nick Mead who directed a short film and self-shot documentary about London's Soho life called "Dean Street Shuffle". A further documentary film was made about The Colony club in London's Soho. It follows its evolution from a shelter for persecuted gays to a playground for rock stars and artists in Swinging London. Backed by tunes from The Clash, The Colony featured appearances by singer Joe Strummer, critic George Melly, filmmaker John Maybury, and Pop artist Patrick Caufield.

Lisa received further acting propositions, even one which included an opportunity to star behind the bar in the Rovers Return, in the legendary UK soap Coronation Street. However unable to commit to a three year role, Lisa turned it down.

2012 proved to be an important year for Lisa with a welcome return to the limelight.  The filmmaker and photographer Elaine Constantine  gave Stansfield a starring role the independent film "Northern Soul"  starring a renowned cast of UK actors including Steve Coogan and Ricky Tomlinson.  The film was about the social phenomenon of the time with its music and dance movement that took hold in the North of England. However it was Lisa's absence from the music scene that kept her fans wondering whether or not another album would be in the pipeline. In an a magazine interview published in early 2012, she hinted at the idea of recording a new album. 

After a hiatus of a seven year absence from touring and almost eight years without new music, Lisa announced in the autumn of 2012  three intimate gigs (two in London and one in Manchester). She showcased a set of her biggest hits and previewed several brand new tracks to be featured on her eventual seventh album. These three shows confirmed to the fans and cynics of the music world that, "the voice" still had it! Social media sources were quick to announce Lisa's welcome return to the music scene.

Following on from the positive feedback, more tour dates were announced in the UK and across Europe in the spring and autumn of 2013. Together with her newly formed band they travelled to Indonesia for the Java Jazz Festival. Shortly after Lisa set about recording her much anticipated new album between glitzy L.A and at her own recording studio Gracieland in her hometown of Rochdale Lancashire.

Whilst in L.A, Lisa and Ian collaborated together with John Robinson, known as the most recorded drummer in history and Grammy Award winning orchestrator Jerry Hey, both integral to the creation of Michael Jackson's Off the Wall, Thriller and Bad who had initially worked together with them on their very first album Big Thing. The final polishing touches were made at their own studio in Rochdale for completion in September 2013.

Fans were made to wait  patiently until February 2014  for  the release of "Seven" which comprised of 10 impeccably crafted songs with several exclusive tracks which were added to the Deluxe edition.  21-gun salute reviews were received  far and wide from the music critics and the seventh studio album was heading its way up the album charts.

In October 2014 the album had a makeover as an expanded double CD edition with previously unreleased remixes from Cool Million, Snowboy, Opolopo, Andy Lewis and Moto Blanco.

Produced and written by Lisa and Ian, ‘Seven’ was a welcome return to the soul and R&B that she has been so well known for. Speaking of the album  Lisa said, “It is a soul record and while it is eclectic there is a thread running through it. It was basically me and Ian doing everything…but we also had a team of amazing musicians in the studio with us.”  The album was released under earMUSIC, the international Pop Rock division of Edel, in Germany and under their own label Monkeynatra on in the UK.

During the sell-out European tour of Seven in 2014, 'Live in Manchester'  filmed and recorded at Manchester's Bridgewater Hall on 7 September 2014) was released as a 2CD and DVD on 28th August 2015.

In 2015, Lisa set about working on her eighth studio album. Bringing in long term friend and faithful band member since 1990 Mark 'Snowboy' Cotgrove as the Co producer together with writing and musical  partner Ian Devaney. Over two years in the making, Lisa proudly announced in October 2017 that the new album will be called 'Deeper'  to be released April 6th 2018 accompanied by a UK and European tour.

Speaking about the record,  Lisa said “Creating this album was a wonderful adventure. I really believe there’s a special something in this record. I’m so excited to let it go out into the big wide world with pride.”

An album teaser  track 'Everything’ was made available in early January 2018 for direct download from pre-ordering the album before it's release date. With its groove, funk, soul and Lisa's signature vocals, the song was an exciting taster of what to expect from the new album. After two weeks of radio airplay, 'Everything' went straight to Number 1 in the UK Soul Chart, receiving rave reviews from music critics far and wide.

'Billionaire' was announced as the first official single release from Deeper. The track is a fine example of Lisa's songcraft with her ability to capture a soap opera in a song”.

If you are a casual fan of Lisa Stansfield or might not know her work then this is someone I would urge you to explore more. Having released so many huge hits and with one of the most distinct and best voices we have ever produced, I hope there is a lot of celebration around her on her sixtieth birthday on 11th April. An artist I am very fond of and have loved since childhood, this is my salute to…

THE wonderful Lisa Stansfield.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Unflirt

FEATURE:

Spotlight

PHOTO CREDIT: Claryn Chong

Unflirt

__________

WHILST her friends and family…

know her as Christine Senorin, the music world knows her as Unflirt. The London artist has been tipped by several sites, including NME, as one of the most important names to watch this year. I love last year’s E.P., Fleeting. An amazing cover and a distinct and beautiful collection of songs, I want to put this artist on other people’s radars. I am starting out with an interview from CLASH. Spotlighting Unflirt as part of their Next Wave series in January, I do feel that her best days lie shortly ahead:

“As a Filipino, music was never too far from her, growing up with a ballad loving mother and father who played guitar, it seemed like a path waiting for her. “My dad taught me how to play the guitar when I was like six-years-old… Subconsciously I feel like that type of music influenced me”. When talking about releasing music Unflirt admitted to never fully getting over the initial fear of posting and seeing people’s reactions to her work. “When you’re sharing something that’s so vulnerable and personal, I feel like I’m really… I guess I’m a bit more private when it comes to my personal life online… Having the response from people and seeing them relate and resonate to what I’m feeling helps”.

‘Fleeting’ moves away from Unflirt’s previous releases, proving to be a renaissance for her and a reflection of the chaos circulating her life at the time. This new EP signifies her acceptance of the past, choosing to live in the moment instead of pondering on what has already been, like many of us do. “For the past two years of my life I was going back and forth from Brazil a lot because I was in a long distance relationship…The way you perceive and value time changes when you have such limited time with someone you love. There are a lot of different themes around the EP, with this I just wanted to make life easier for myself, and stop writing songs about missing things that were over”. Finally accepting the frustrating lack of control this life provides, Unflirt told Clash, “With this project I was just trying to accept that time is fleeting, and time is always changing, and things are always changing. There’s nothing I can do, and I just need to stop resisting it”.

Unflirt provides sentimental value to her music, vulnerably inviting us into her inner world through the alluring shoegaze and bedroom pop mix. Providing a space to contemplate on the complexity of our feelings, she found solace in writing about the unspoken obsessive pondering we bully ourselves with, and the relief of finally accepting every aspect of life instead of shaming yourself. “When writing ‘fleeting’, I had to acknowledge that I was feeling that… I do feel jealous, I do feel this horrible emotion. It’s such a normal feeling, and I feel like writing those songs helped me understand myself, and realise that these negative emotions are fleeting. Looking back at some of the songs, I wrote them like the world was going to end. Even though I will inevitably feel these horrible things sometimes, it won’t last forever”.

The songs started to take shape in Brazil when she had time to just be with herself and her guitar, writing, and taking inspiration from artists like Gal Costa and Arthur Verocai. Getting into the flow of things, Unflirt was able to write without the pressure of making a fully fleshed out song. “I was writing every single day, and I feel like that time really helped me focus on the songwriting and the base of the song. After my time in Brazil I found out I was going to LA to record. We recorded a few songs there, and then I went back to London, and that’s where all the more depressing songs came… After recording in LA I thought I was finished, but I went back to London, wrote all these other songs, and realised it really wasn’t finished at all. I was itching to release new music, but I’m really thankful everything happened the way it did”.

There are a couple more interviews I want to include, just to give you some insight into the work and life of Unflirt and her amazing new E.P., Fleeting. The Line of Best Fit featured her last year and noted how this artist on the rise is creating music that will endure. Such a hugely promising artist from West London who blends ethereal Pop and Shoegaze, I don’t think there is anything quite like her on the scene:

“There's something timeless about Senorin, and on Fleeting, this timelessness comes through in earnest. Though only 25, Senorin carries the torch of soft, melancholy early-2000s singer-songwriters, putting out work that feels like it’s caught in the grain of a film photograph. Her world is sun-faded and intimate: thrifted knits, washed colour palettes, a quiet self-possession that lingers in both her look and her sound.

Now signed to FADER Label, Fleeting is the project that has allowed Senorin to find her voice. These last two years have been ones of major growth for her, both personally and sonically. As Senorin explains: “[My] age played a big part in this EP… being 23, 24, 25—things go so quickly. For some reason, 25 feels so much older.” Coming into adulthood, Fleeting reflects her new sound and the colliding of past and present.

Fleeting “feels like a better representation of who I am and where I am in life,” she says. While her work as an artist began in her quiet London bedroom during lockdown, her catalogue has grown into a catalogue of shoegaze reflections. Since her first recordings in 2020, Unflirt’s angelic, wandering voice has drawn an ever-widening orbit of listeners.

Surrounded by that warmth, the songs took shape. In Brazil, days moved slower. “It was one of the first times I wasn’t rushing,” she says. “I’d go days without touching my phone and just write or sit there listening.” That quiet rhythm, compounded with an Adrianne Lenker songwriting course that pushed Senorin to pay attention to the mundane and quotidian, became an unlearning: no studios, no pressure, just the guitar and the feeling of being alone with her songs.

The resulting raw honesty of Fleeting thus put Senorin’s voice and inner life front and centre. “I used to hide under the guitars and production,” she says. “There was a huge wall of sound and me behind it. But this was the first time I really understood that less is more.” For Senorin, maturing comes with not being afraid of a stripped-back, intimate song.

Fleeting is coming-of-age in the present tense—the emotional oscillation of coming and going is the root of Senorin’s nostalgia. The songs were shaped in motion, written between airports, bus rides and bedrooms. Its first single, “Seasong”, and final track, “Sopro”, are mirror emotions, two versions of the same farewell.

Between places and years, from Brazil to LA and back to London, Senorin will always have her process: writing on the floor of her bedroom with her acoustic guitar, even when the rest of her life feels in motion. That small ritual keeps her tethered to herself. “The one thing that helps the project flow,” she says, “is that it all came from the same root: being written on a bed or on the floor in my room with my guitar”.

I am going to end with 10 Magazine and their conversation with Unflirt. It is interesting seeing where Unflirt is now and the music is producing. And where she heads from here. I do hope that there are a lot of tour dates later in the year. An opportunity to see her up close on the stage. I would be interested to seeing one of her shows:

“Describe the new EP in three words.

Fresh, Dreamy, Intimate.

How has your Filipino heritage had an influence on your sound?

Growing up in a Filipino household for me meant always being surrounded by music and karaoke. My dad taught me how to play the guitar when I was seven and to this day plays the electric guitar for several hours everyday. My mum on the other hand has always had the radio on my whole life and like many Filipinos, loves all the classic anthemic ballads. I guess these things rubbed off without me realising and can explain a lot of my sound.

What does the word ‘fleeting’ mean to you personally?

For me, ‘fleeting’ represents accepting uncertainty and inevitable change that comes with the passing of time. It’s an attempt to stop resisting time and try to be as present as possible, whether it was a beautiful moment I didn’t want to forget, or an uncomfortable emotion that I had to go through.

You wrote the album in Brazil, did you go on any fun adventures during your time there that you can share with us?

I spent New Years on the beach on the coast of São Paulo, and on the first day of the year we hiked to the most beautiful waterfall. So many special and surreal memories!

What’s next for Unflirt?

So much! To keep making music, experimenting and exploring new sounds, but also getting ready for my first headline tour at the end of the year”.

Among all the promising artists being tipped for big things this year, Unflirt is someone I am especially excited about. In terms of how her music will build and evolve in the coming years. Fleeting is her latest offering and a step up, yet I do feel that her best work lies ahead. Whilst she still might be seeking her true sound and niche, the music she is putting out at the moment is incredible. If you do not yet know about Unflirt, then do go and spend time…

WITH her now.

___________

Follow Unflirt

PHOTO CREDIT: Claryn Chong

Official:

https://www.unflirt.net/

Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/unflirt/

TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@unflirt22

Spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/artist/19fxSFm3VSC8tg7msuw8zV?si=WpTvdinwSSCZ_DuUF4yGLA

YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/c/unflirt

FEATURE: International Women’s Day and The Trouble Club: Why This Growing Community Is Especially Important to Me

FEATURE:

 

 

International Women’s Day and The Trouble Club

IN THIS PHOTO: Laura Bates was a guest for The Trouble Club on Thursday, 19th February at St Marylebone Parish Church, London, where she was interviewed by The Trouble Club’s CEO and owner, Ellie Newton/PHOTO CREDIT: Ioana Marinca

Why This Growing Community Is Especially Important to Me

__________

THERE is not much…

PHOTO CREDIT: International Women’s Day

keeping me in London at the moment to be fair. In all honesty, living here on a budget and sharing with other people is not ideal. I would love to live somewhere with space on my own and in a quiet area. However, given where I am in life and a lack of money to do that, I am having to make the best of things (though I am moving into a new place soon with lovely people!). Having access to the city and its culture is a definite bonus, yet the downsides of living in London is definitely getting to me. Aside from the music, there is another reason to remain put. The Trouble Club is a community I have been a part of for nearly three years. I am not sure how many events I have been to – in triple figures by now I think, but I cannot be 100% -, but they are always so impactful and memorable. A range of women across media, culture, politics and beyond is invited to a different venue in London to discuss their new book, their career or something in their life. Led by CEO and owner Ellie Newton, and with a brilliant team around her – including Zea, Jen, photographers Ioana and Alice, and some brilliant people -, the membership is growing. Rather than it being just about the guests, this sense of togetherness and community is key. I wanted to tie this feature into International Women’s Day, which happens on 8th March. In addition to learning about the brilliant women who speak at The Trouble Club, I feel there is this mission to highlight the brilliance and incredible value of women and tackle the inequality and discrimination they face. Troublesome women speaking incredibly openly, honestly and bravely. I will speak about the most recent event I attended and the huge emotion and impact that left on me. Many of the women who appear at The Trouble Club speak about some horrible experiences and struggles. The theme of this International Women’s Day is Give to Gain, which highlights the power of reciprocity, generosity, and collaboration to advance gender equality. This campaign encourages individuals and organisations to share time, resources, knowledge, and advocacy to create opportunities for women and girls.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Ellie Newton (@elliejnewton)

It seems like the world today is as unsettling, horrible and unequal for women than it has ever been. That seems like a bold statement considering the thousands of years where women have been oppressed, attacked, denied rights and very much seen as secondary. Laura Bates spoke for The Trouble Club on 19th February. Her book, The New Age of Sexism: How the AI Revolution is Reinventing Misogyny, is one I have read and been utterly stunned by! She is someone who is so captivating to listen to, as she is so knowledgeable and authoritative about what she is speaking about. How technology and A.I. has misogyny and abuse built into it. The realities for women now and how vulnerable they are. How many are using A.I. to degrade, debase and abuse women. It was a spectacular interview, but one that left many numb and emotional. Bates herself has faced constant threats of abuse and harm. Death threats. She revealed how she has a police alert alarm in case she is attacked or her house is broken into to. How she must feel so unsafe every minute of the day, and yet she speaks about her experiences, fights for the rights of women and talks about this new wave of misogyny through A.I. How there are other women who are risking their safety and lives to do this too. Not only did it make me thankful to be at The Trouble Club and get to hear women like Laura Bates speak and take so much away from it. A lot of things stood out from a mind-blowing, heart-stopping, gut-wrenching and thought-provoking evening. However, Bates said near the top of the interview how women are not seen as human beings. Far from being seen as equal, they are not even seen as human beings. How tech companies and men are using A.I. to allow other men to abuse, rape and attack them. That idea of International Women’s Day theme being about equality and respect for women. How far are we from realistically achieving that?! It seems, the more rich men have power, the less equality and respect they have. Technology makes it easier than ever for men to remain hidden and subject women to horrendous abuse and threats. They can get away with it because, as Laura Bates explained, it is good for business. The bottom line is as long as people like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg make money, then it does not matter what happens to women. It is harrowing, heartbreaking and, sadly, something that will not change unless there is huge change and commitment to use A.I. for good. Bates founded  the Everyday Sexism Project website in 2012. These accounts from thousands of women discussing their experience of sexism and abuse is so valuable and important. It gives them a community, outlet and voice. And it also shows the sheer extent and scale of the problem!

Bates herself has been sent deepfake videos and images of herself being abused. So many other women have. I am not doing justice to what she said last week and how impassioned and extraordinary her words were! I would advise people read her book and the rest of her work. Visit her website and see why she is viewed by many as the voice of her generation. Laura Bates is one of so many brilliant and inspiring women who speak for The Trouble Club. Her talk instantly is in the top three best-ever appearances I have seen in my view! Bates mentioned a few organisations that are definitely worth checking out: Glitch, AJL, Chayn, and Equality Now. So much admiration and respect to Ellie Newton – who I think was almost moved to tears numerous times when speaking with Laura Bates – and what she has created and continues to build. However, there are positives for sure. One of the biggest draws of The Trouble Club is hearing about incredible women and their success. If men in power and society sees women as second-class or even something below that of human, hearing about these queens of business, literature, politics, campaigning, culture and beyond do such phenomenal work and create this success for themselves and pave the way for other women is encouraging. They are sure as hell not being helped by too many men. Women not only having to make their own opportunities, success and visibility. They also have to speak up and against problems entirely created and fuelled by men! It makes me so appreciative of women. Amazing human beings who give so much and have to face so many barriers and are constantly held back and overlooked, I am always in awe. As a music journalist, I recognise how the industry is being dominated by women. The best work from them, and yet they are still subjected to misogyny and inequality. A new report has shown that there are concerns over pay and safety when it comes to women in music. Most of my features concern women in music, and I think of myself as a feminist writer.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Trouble Club (@thetroubleclub)

The Trouble Club has definitely strengthened that and also made me ask what I can do to become more active and involved in terms of addressing misogyny. There are some fantastic women coming up who will be must-see. Berth Rigby and Kate Adie are just two of the wonderful guests coming up. The Culture Roundup with Lara Olszowska will be interesting. Even though it is not until 20th May, Caitlin Moran & Bryony Gordon: A Night of Very Questionable Wisdom! is one I cannot wait for! I have always wanted to hear Caitlin Moran speak but never had the chance. Seeing her on the stage with Bryony Gordon will be a night to remember. Even though the event is a “journey through Caitlin and Bryony's life via the best and most dangerous advice they've ever received. Friendship, failure, politeness, people-pleasing, sex, sacrifice, it's all on the table along with many existential wobbles”, I am thinking back to the first time Moran spoke for the Trouble Club. Last year, when she was in conversation with Ellie Newton in Manchester, she discussed how there should be this new wave of feminism that is about positivity and love. I have written about this before. I love the Give to Gain theme of this International Women’s Day and that idea of reciprocity, generosity, and collaboration to advance gender equality. What Moran raises about a new wave of feminism being about positivity and love. So much to cling onto and find hope in. I left that recent event with Laura Bates wondering whether there is any hope. In terms of what women have to face and how far away we are from basic respect, and let alone equality, are these heady ideas of compassion, positivity and hope tangible or possible?! I am writing music features around International Women’s Day and will be completing a Step4Change challenge on International Women’s Day to raise funds for Refuge. I am always so proud of being a member of The Trouble Club. It may not be too long until circumstances takes me away from London, and not being there in-person at Trouble events will be a huge loss. Though I can still see them online and will pop along for the odd one now and then. Being part of The Trouble Club and attending these incredible events is so important to me. It makes me feel less alone in a city that is easy to get buried in! It also is vital when it comes to the way I see society and how women are treated. How hard they have to fight and why things need to change. Another salute to The Trouble Club and…

ITS amazing members.

FEATURE: Kate Bush’s Director’s Cut at Fifteen: Never Be Mine: The Selection Process

FEATURE:

 

 

Kate Bush’s Director’s Cut at Fifteen

Never Be Mine: The Selection Process

__________

ALTHOUGH we do not have…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in a promotional image for the 2011 album, Director’s Cut

any big anniversaries to celebrate around Kate Bush’s work this year, there are some minor ones. Two of her albums turn fifteen. In November, her most recent studio album, 50 Words for Snow. On 16th May, Director’s Cut is fifteen. This is often so as a lesser work. One that is not essential. However, I do feel like it is an important album that was a definite turning point. The first time Bush had really done this amount of retrospection. The album is comprised of reworked or rerecorded versions of songs from 1989’s The Sensual World and 1993’s The Red Shoes. Artists more and more do look back at their albums and rerecord songs. Maybe not as common in 2011, we do hear cases of these major acts combing taking another shot at songs or albums maybe they were not completely happy with. It might seem strange that Kate Bush was unhappy or felt this sense of dissatisfaction with her work. She produced The Sensual World and The Red Shoes, so she would have had control over the sound. However, she did say that you can do the best you can at the time. Certain things out of her control. Maybe feeling overwhelmed by the technology on The Sensual World or finding it hard to follow Hounds of Love, I have always felt the album warm and exceptional. Thought you can sympathise with Bush in the sense it may not have sounded like she imagined. The Red Shoes is edgier and is a bit compressed or artificial. Not as natural or warm-sounding as it could have been. Before she could move on and release new material, there was this lingering sense of rectification. There are a couple of interesting aspects around Director’s Cut. This was the first album since 2005’s Aerial. It was important to Bush that drummer Steve Gadd was at the centre. That his drums would be this new heartbeat. A pacemaker or transplant that would give these previous songs new flow and vitality. As a big fan of his work, getting him on board was a must.

Also, having previously been denied permission from the James Joyce estate for Kate Bush to use the words from Ulysses for the title track for The Sensual World, she did get permission this time. It was about to go out of copyright anyway, so they had this opportunity to make some money whilst they could. A book goes out of copyright seventy years after an author dies. Joyce died on 13th January, 1941, so Bush could have used the words freely if she had waited a little longer. However, now free to use the original text, it did give her this foundation. Many would argue about the track inclusions and which songs could have been included. That selection process is important. I want to source from Graeme Thomson’s Under the Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush. Mica Paris was one of the artists who featured on Director’s Cut. She was sworn to secrecy by Kate Bush. Not wanting anyone to know she was working on something new. Bush is someone who has in years since reproached her work. However, this was the first major overhaul. Maybe feeling some of the aspects of that late-1980s/1990s production was cluttered and overproduced, she wanted something that was perhaps more organic, laidback and expansive. A certain sense of commercial pressure for The Sensual World meant she did not give the songs the consideration or space they needed. Maybe a little burned-out and tired during recording The Red Shoes. Feeling the production had to sound the way it did as the album came out in 1993. Why choose these two albums?! Bush could have gone back and tackled 1978’s Lionheart or even done something different with 1982’s The Dreaming. However, she had this feeling that moments on The Sensual World and The Red Shoes could have been bettered. Many argue that Flower of the Mountain – the new title for the re-worked version of The Sensual World – does not match the original. You can see why Bush wanted to include this song. Graeme Thomson notes how the production sound on these albums was more beholden to the trends of the time. Bush perhaps trapped in that sense. Having regained control and ownership of these albums from EMI – alongside The Dreaming and Hounds of Love -, she had an opportunity to update tracks from The Sensual World and The Red Shoes.

As producer and songwriter, Kate Bush had this authority over her own work. However, there does seem to have been this real sense of creative ‘compromise’ or a feeling of unease between Hounds of Love (1985) and Aerial (2005). The fact songs on The Red Shoes were recorded on digital equipment stripped a degree of warmth and depth to them. It was clear that the majority of songs from Director’s Cut would be from The Red Shoes. There was not this precise process when it came to the tracklisting. Bush did write the first things that came into her head. In terms of the most-streamed songs from Director’s Cut, the top three songs (as of the date I am writing this, 21st February), are This Woman’s Work, Flower of the Mountain and Deeper Understanding. Three songs that originally appeared on The Sensual World. Given that the majority of the songs on Director’s Cut are from The Red Shoes, does this suggest fans still did not love the reworked versions or they felt that these three cuts from The Sensual World were especially exceptional? Perhaps both. Bush transferred all the digital recordings to tape. Removing the original drum parts, vocals and backing. On some songs, instrumental layers were stripped to. She had access to old valve amps and ProTools. There was now this free space to start again and rebuild these tracks. Steve Gadd said how he would come and work for five days or a week each visit (as an American artist, it was perhaps not convenient coming to and for Bush’s home in Theale, Berkshire). It would often be just Kate Bush and Del Palmer in the studio. The late Palmer was Bush’s engineer and musician on many of her albums. He was also in a long-term relationship with her. Bush did struggle at times to get the project to gel.

Almost considering setting the album aside, rather than covering her own songs, she lowered her voice and approached it almost like a live album. Dropping the key was the key to unlocking the potential! Songs like Lily and The Song of Solomon dropped by a semi-tone. Mica Paris, who sung backing vocals on Lily, fondly recalled Bush’s sharing energy and collaborative nature, but also her mastery of the studio. Recording for a day in 2010, it was an intense but fun session. Maybe Bush selected certain songs to re-explore as she felt they were too conventional first time around. Allowing herself to be weird and experimental again, The Song of Solomon, The Red Shoes, Lily and Top of the City seem reborn and revitalised in this new setting. With age, Bush had this new perspective and insight. This Woman’s Work was lengthened and transformed. Graeme Thomson notes how this glacial and ambient version of the song did not try to compete with or replace the original. You feel Bush’s selection was not as random and spontaneous as she revealed. Wanting to take classics and approach them from a new headspace and position in life, she also wanted to take some tracks that were perhaps not reviewed or mentioned when they appeared on The Sensual World and The Red Shoes and give them new life. On songs like Director’s Cut, she wanted to remove the stack of vocals and replace them with a solitary voice (the processed voice of her young son, Bertie, featured on the Director’s Cut version). If not everything worked or matched the original, Bush looking at her legacy and wanting to improve the sound and production on songs she felt lacked something the first time around is commendable. If it is not seen as a favourite album by many Kate Bush fans, I do think that it is important she did this. I would love to think Bush would do something like this again, though I feel there was something about The Sensual World and The Red Shoes that was disappointing or not up to scratch.

I do think there is relevance to a lot of the song selection. A modern take on Deeper Understanding and this idea of people being hooked on computers and addicted to technology. This Woman’s Work given a more mature and older voice really does add new perspective. And So Is Love and Never Be Mine perhaps seen as too negative or downbeat. Bush wanting to spotlight these songs and take them in a slightly new direction. I feel that some of the songs she chose provided an opportunity to take well-known classics and reinvent them. Songs about love, loss and paternal responsibility given new significance and e motional depth so many years after they were first heard. Perhaps The Red Shoes, Lily and Top of the City, in Bush’s mind, lacked a certain spark or energy first time around. The reviews were mixed. Many applauding Bush for undertaking the project and highlighting how she was this innovative and surprising artist. Others felt Director’s Cut was more curio than anything essential or worthy. This is what the BBC noted in their review: “As much as it’s fascinating to hear Bush the Elder look back at Bush the Younger, is the tinkering worth a full album? Yes, because it’s a sign Bush the Artist is still alive (she’s working on new songs too) and Director’s Cut (a less prosaic title would have been nice) is a gorgeous body of work”. That idea of Bush as a woman in her fifties looking back and updating songs she released when she was in her thirties. It is a fascinating album. Bush did say in promotional interviews how some of the songs did not get airing or attention first time around so she wanted to revisit them and give them focus. Transferring things to analogue so they were warmer recordings. Turning fifteen on 16th May, I will write other features around Director’s Cut. I have a lot of respect for Director’s Cut. I do think that some of the originals were great as they are, but the fact Bush wanted to strip them down and do something new with them is commendable. Do not ignore The Sensual World and The Red Shoes, as they are brilliant albums. However, Director’s Cut is this rare occasion of Bush looking back. A bold venture that, whilst not always brilliant, she felt she had to do, I applaud her for that. I think that Director’s Cut is an album that deserves more love and appreciation. Even if you do not like all of the new versions she presented in 2011, there is no arguing against the fact Director’s Cut contains…

MOMENTS of real gold.