FEATURE: Spotlight: Night Tapes

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

PHOTO CREDIT: Jamie-Lee Culver

 

Night Tapes

__________

I will include a couple of…

2024 interviews with Night Tapes before getting to some newer chats. First, I want to feature The Honey Pop and their interview from last June. I am quite new to Night Tapes, so it is helpful looking back at previous interviews and seeing where they have come from. You can tell the London-based trio of Max Doohan, Sam Richards and Iiris Vesik. If you have not yet discovered the trio then I would thoroughly recommend them:

Your previous EP, Perfect Kindness, is something we can never get enough of. We’re obsessed with the ethereal energy in both the instrumentals and vocals. Each track is its own perfect vibe/journey. Can you tell us a bit about the creation process of the Perfect Kindness EP?

Ah, that’s nice. It took quite a long time and meticulous crafting of the whole EP. We had time to make 20 versions of everything. For example, there were like 20 versions of ‘Inigo’ before its final form.

Perfect Kindness came together more as a collage. Some of these songs like ‘Selene’ and ‘Humans’ were made after Richie heard them in his dreams. Silent Song was a process from 2016-2022 – it started as a piano song and then re-emerged when Max found a loop that we all had jammed on with drums, synths, and flute. The topline just fit and suddenly everything made sense.

We used to all live together in a house back then and flitter between each other’s rooms when anyone had a cool idea going. We used to have lots of random jams together and recorded them onto tape in our bedroom studios. We still have hundreds of little demos from that time and occasionally we’ll go through them for textures and vibes.

Speaking of creating an EP, how would you compare the process of creating Perfect Kindness to the creation of your new EP, assisted memories?

Both were created in our living quarters. Perfect Kindness was made in bedrooms while assisted memories were made mostly in living rooms and corridors.

Perfect Kindness took a long time to create and assisted memories came together quite fast. We really had years to reopen the projects on Perfect Kindness whilst with assisted memories we had a deadline for the first time.

For me the 2 EP’s have quite a yin & yang energy going on. Perfect Kindness is definitely yin: nighttime listening, wandering and experimenting.  assisted memories is quite yang: it’s more directional and punchy, the songs feel to me like crystallized snowflakes.

In terms of making assisted memories, everything that we had learned whilst making perfect kindness we could refine and put into (fast) practice with assisted memories. I’m also really proud to see how the songs that Max and Richie mixed turned out. We are so happy that for both of these EPs for specific songs we got to work with the mix wizard Nathan Boddy, he really elevated the tracks he worked on.

The EPs are going to be on double vinyl together when the new assisted memories comes out.

The genre of “dream pop” is so fitting for your sound, in our opinion! What are some of the influences/genres/artists that helped bring you to the sound you have today?

Ah! That’s nice to hear, yeah we love dreamy ethereal stuff but our backgrounds are actually more electronic. We hadn’t really listened to Cocteau Twins before people started to reference them in comparison to us. We do love Tame Impala and Deerhunter, but I wouldn’t say that we listen to dream pop usually.

I have always been a Björk, Bowie, Kate Bush Holy Trinity fangirl & at the moment I’m actually listening to a lot of dance music, future breakbeat & I’ve been discovering UK jungle & garage gems. I was the one to bring the boys over to the dark side and now they also love pop music. But they’re probably not as into Charlie Puth as I am. I always try to keep an open mind about new music, I’m always on the prowl for some.

Richie probably is the most indie of us all, loves Bon Iver and Big Thief. But when I met him then he was making more electronic dance music and house music.  He is big into his chord sequences and he has a jazz guitar degree.

Max has always been an ambient music lover – Brian Eno, Hiroshi Yoshimura, Lone, and such. When I met him, he was making ambient-infused electronic dance music.  He is big into drones. He also plays drums in a post-rock/electronic indie band and he is sessioning top-level R&B bass at the moment”.

I am going to move on to UNCLEAR and their interview with Night Tapes. Speaking with the three-piece around assisted memories and its success, it was a big step for them. This year has seen incredible singles such as helix and storm. This is a group with a massive future ahead. Although I have not known about them for too long, I can see there is a lot of excitement around them:

What is your writing/production process typically like? Did you try any new methods or styles within this process recently?

Night Tapes: “Our writing process is pretty erratic. We all make tracks individually and we can write together. The annoying, correct answer to this question is ‘every time is different’ ([laughs] I used to absolutely loathe these kinds of answers, but it’s so true). I think it’s good to keep on exploring, there is a saying that applies to art quite well: ‘if you think you know what you’re doing, you’ve killed it.’  Throughout the years we have learned to just make songs happen faster, but switching up approaches like writing with a new instrument or writing to visuals seems to work for us.”

If you each had to choose a favorite track from this EP, which would it be and why?

Night Tapes: “At the moment my fave is ‘easy time to be alive.’ It’s built on this one spontaneous dictaphone recording we did one morning with Max. We found the recording randomly at a session and built everything around it as we couldn’t change anything about it. It turned out everything was there, we just needed to trust the first recording and the first feeling it had.”

This fall, you’ll be on your debut US tour including shows in NYC and LA! Which part of this tour are you most excited for?

Night Tapes: “We are so excited to see all the new cities we’ve never been to before (Chicago and San Francisco). We are also very excited to see the people who have been championing us online.”

What do you want to tell your future, end-of-this-year self? What do you hope you’ve accomplished individually and as a group by December 31st?

Night Tapes: “I would like to tell my future end-of-this-year self that creativity needs order and chaos and I hope she will go to a sunny place this winter to rest, regroup and adventure. I would like to accomplish inner freedom, thank you”.

I am going to move to this year. On 26th September, Night Tapes release their debut album, portals//polarities. After a series of E.P.s and singles, this is the first definitive and full work from Night Tapes. I am writing this on 15th September, so I am not sure what the reviews are like for the album. We will soon find out. The Line of Best Fit spoke with the trio in August. It is a fascinating interview. Starly Lou Riggs spent time with a trio who are creating their own sound and niche. The Line of Best Fit say that “Instead of heading to bed after performing, Night Tapes wrote an entirely new album on their last tour. Born in hotel rooms on the road, it finds Iiris Vesik, Max Doohan, and Sam “Richie” Richards cracking the code on how to capture a moment in time with sound”:

Night Tapes are all about vibes. More specifically, they’re about organic feeling and expression. Each of these tracks tells the story of a time and place, serving as a diverse array of sounds and mapping the band’s sonic dreamscape – from sun-laced dance hits about a screen-obsessed world (“television”) to more seedy city grit (“leave it all behind, Mike”), the album feels like riding a virtual wave of both soft and heavy currents.

Sitting atop Doohan and Richards’ hypnotic instrumentals, Vesik’s whispered vocals act as a teleportation device. Amid twisting tones that feel weightless, tracks like “tokyo sway” and “masterplan” feel like a journey to another dimension – one entwined in VHS-tape ribbon and a blue crackling screen. The heavy-hitting punchy beats of delicate trip-hop track “babygirl (like n01 else)” juxtapose with Vesik’s syrupy vocals. From “enter” to “wayfarer”, Night Tapes invite nostalgia without going backwards in time. Instead, they’re bridging the gap, bringing together both inner and outer worlds.

In general, electronic music has an air of being “perfected.” When polished and tuned, live instrumental tracking sometimes disappears. Night Tapes, however, bend these expectations by tracking with both messy and masterly methods. “When we capture the recordings – the raw recordings – that’s not precise,” Doohan clarifies. “But then we [go] through everything with a fine-toothed comb and apply that electronic production mindset to these imperfect things.” The resulting sound is something a bit in between, capturing the human behind the computerboard.

PHOTO CREDIT: Marii Kiisk

To simply call the band “electronic” does them a disservice. Their work feels more like a lucid dream, breathing new life into the familiar sounds of shoegaze, synth-pop, and trip-hop, gripping a ‘90s backdrop while looking into the future. On top of it all, they write everything improvisationally. Whether at home or abroad, the process is so wonderfully collaborative that they sometimes forget who wrote which line. Doohan laughs, “There are some bass lines that I’ll play the first half of and then Richie will play the second half, maybe slightly overlaying each other, so they’re actually kind of impossible to play!” Later, they have to relearn each track to play live as a band, pulling from recordings and fitting them together again like puzzle pieces.

They’ve been so successfully locked in with conceptual EPs, it’s landed them tours across the globe and over 18 million streams. While a lot of their inspiration still stems from London, the group got a fresh wave of inspiration out on the road post-pandemic lockdown. In the end, Vesik explains, “We tried writing at home for quite a long time before, and it all just came together on tour.”

Lit by a new match, Vesik, Doohan, and Richards were able to find new inspiration in the very places they dreamt of visiting. After kicking off the dust of pandemic restlessness, Richards notices that “the songs were a way of escaping the mundanity of being in London and being inside. We were lucky we could be together to write that, but a lot of the time, it’s as if we’re somewhere else.” They had hoped to visit Mexico, even writing “pacifico” about the city of San José del Pacifico before ever setting foot in the country. The track serves instead as a daydream, depicting a place their friend had visited and told them about”.

I am going to end in a minute. The final interview is from NME. Transporting and deep Pop, Night Tapes put their feelings very much first when it comes to their music. NME observed how the trio infuse and pack their songs with “vitality, emotion and the spirit of their travels”. The brilliant and anticipated portals//polarities is one of the most essential, important debut albums of this year. I recently published a mixtape with songs from incredible debut albums. That was before portals//polarities came out. I think that this album will get an honourable mention:

While ‘Portals // Polarities’ continues their knack for gliding melodies and synths that practically glow, it also pivots towards trip hop, breakbeat and acid house – in part, thanks to Doohan’s more recent interest in dance music. “Because we’re always trying to react to each other, somebody might bring something which is really far outside that direction,” Richards explains when NME meets the band in more familiar territory – dialling in from their south London house-share, not long after wrapping up their Cover photoshoot. “Then, we always try to understand what makes it sound like Night Tapes and catch it.”

But for a band whose work remains so intimate and spectral, ‘Portals // Polarities’ is “probably the most extroverted work we’ve done”. “The beginning of Night Tapes was more introverted and slower, but our lives were also slower,” Vesik admits. “Everything’s going so fast now. It’s like, whirr! It’s interesting to capture the snapshots.”

London seemed like an endless font of inspiration when Night Tapes began. It was a change of pace from the band’s backgrounds: Doohan and Richards hail from rural towns around the New Forest, while Vesik is from Tallinn, Estonia, and moved to London a decade ago to pursue music. “I guess I was always quite expressive – the usual!” she cackles, bold red lipstick marks streaked across her cheeks from the photoshoot. “We have a certain stereotype of Estonians,” she adds, referencing the country’s aloof image, “which I believe is not true. We have a very rich inner life – we might not always share it…”

PHOTO CREDIT: Jamie Waters for NME

Doohan and Vesik met at university and started living together, with Richards joining them later in 2016. Initially, all three pursued their own musical projects, but soon began jamming together at night. When they eventually recorded their 2019 debut EP ‘Dream Forever In Glorious Stereo’, they did so at hushed volumes, so as not to disturb their neighbours. “There’s a lot of collective consciousness – there’s so many dreams and thoughts in London,” Doohan says. “It’s a very powerful, buzzing energy. It’s very inspiring because of that – if you can tap into it and not go crazy…”

Though Night Tapes’ sound is mired in escapism and fantasy, there’s an unusually strong duty to truth on multiple levels. Across the album, you’ll hear a multitude of samples recorded during their tours from November 2024 to January 2025. Most of their vocals were recorded in situ straight into an iPhone, and the band would later craft songs around specific samples, exploring juxtaposing textures and soundscapes to build their worlds.

‘Enter’, for instance, evokes an eerie, surreal limbo, pairing a dampened digital drum kit with strummed acoustic guitars recorded in an Estonian swamp. Meanwhile, those LA helicopters turn ‘Leave It All Behind, Mike’ into a dystopian high-stakes escapade, despite its dreamy ’80s instrumentals: “If the world is ending / Would you share with me our last strawberry?”

“You can have a very simple song, but if you put the sound of a cityscape over the top of it, it completely recontextualises it,” Doohan explains. “You can frame the song differently depending on what kind of foley you use behind it”.

This is a very important time for Night Tapes. With a debut album about to come out (though it will be out by the time this feature is shared), there are some great dates coming up. The trio head to North America for a string of dates. They have so many fans around the world. That will only build and expand as portals//polarities comes out and gets all this love. For those who are unaware of Night Tapes, make sure you add them to your collection. A trio who make music…

THAT is truly unforgettable.

____________

Follow Night Tapes

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Songs from Incredible Debut Albums of 2025

FEATURE:

 

 

The Digital Mixtape

IN THIS PHOTO: Heartworms/PHOTO CREDIT: Jamie Waters for NME

 

Songs from Incredible Debut Albums of 2025

__________

I may do another…

IN THIS PHOTO: JADE/PHOTO CREDIT: Thom Kerr for Wonderland

feature where I name the best ten debut albums of this year. Before then, I have compiled a mixtape featuring songs from incredible debut albums of 2025. I will have forgotten some but, what is my hope, most have been included. The debut album is such a hard thing to pull off. There is a sense of expectation and pressure. This is often the first statement from an artist. I don’t think that many artists hit their peaks on their debut albums. However, there is something special about that first album. This year has seen some extraordinary and eclectic debut albums. I have compiled some tracks from simply amazing introductory albums. These are examples where artists have very much hit…

IN THIS PHOTO: Maruja

THE ground running.

FEATURE: A Passion and Not a Distraction: The Stage Careers of Beloved Artists

FEATURE:

 

 

A Passion and Not a Distraction

IN THIS PHOTO: Lucy Rebecca Taylor (Self Esteem) will appear in David Hare’s Teeth ’n’ Smiles in London next year/ PHOTO CREDIT: Jono White

 

The Stage Careers of Beloved Artists

__________

THERE is this interesting crossover…

PHOTO CREDIT: Brian Lazo/Pexels

and interaction in film and music where we see artists gracing the big screen and turning in wonderful performances. Actors who portray musicians in biopics. There is a whole list of artists who you know would have made incredible actors but never got the chance or decided not to embark on that career. Gwen Stefani leaps to mind. Today, heavyweight artists such as Dua Lipa and Lady Gaga appear in films. Lady Gaga has been for years. Charli xcx is starting out her acting career. Taylor Swift has been in films. Little Simz is a phenomenal actor. There does seem to be this natural relationship between film and music. Most musicians make music videos and there is something about an actor performance from a live gig. A lot of the discipline and personality traits needed to perform an epic gig ties into acting. We will see a lot of great artists go into film and T.V. I am not sure whether the reverse is true and actors can make natural musicians. History says it is s mixed bag! However, if film and music seem to interact, do we talk about musicians appearing on the stage? Some might say that this is a very similar transfer. However, theatre, musical or straight, and film are very different. Film and T.V. relies on multiple takes. Theatre is this single performance where you have to nail it. Musical theatre is so demanding. I don’t think it is as easy to go from music to theatre. Even though a lot of artists have that stamina and stagecraft to deliver a great acting performance, there are dynamics and aspects of an acting performance that are not imbued in music and live performances. Different skills that you have to pick up. It can be hard to detach from the musical arena and step into this different world.

PHOTO CREDIT: Rosaline Shahnavaz/The Guardian

I mention it as there is news that Rebecca Lucy Taylor (a.k.a. Self Esteem) will appear in a new revival that will hit the West End from next March. The Guardian shared a feature about this development. Someone I can see appearing in quite a few films, it seems that Rebecca Lucy Taylor has a natural and burgeoning career in theatre. As she recently staged a theatrical presentation of her latest album, A Complicated Woman, it seems that Taylor is naturally drawn to the stage:

Self Esteem to star as raging rock star in revival of David Hare’s Teeth ’n’ Smiles

Rebecca Lucy Taylor will play Maggie, a role originated by Helen Mirren, in a ‘landmark’ 50th anniversary production in London in March

Fifty years after Helen Mirren originated the role, Rebecca Lucy Taylor AKA Self Esteem is to play a raging rock star in a West End revival of Teeth ’n’ Smiles by David Hare.

It will take Taylor back to the Duke of York’s theatre, where she performed a four-night “theatrical presentation” of her third album, A Complicated Woman, in April. In Hare’s 1975 play she takes the lead role of a singer, Maggie, in an imploding band who put on a concert for a Cambridge University May ball at the end of the 1960s. The mood is summed up by the band’s closing number, Last Orders on the Titanic. Taylor will contribute additional music and lyrics to original song by the brothers Nick and Tony Bicât respectively.

Daniel Raggett will direct the production, which opens in March and runs for 12 weeks. Tickets will go on sale in October. “I’m deeply honoured to be bringing Teeth ’n’ Smiles back for its 50th anniversary,” said Taylor. “I love to challenge myself in new forms and I can’t wait to slap you round the face with Maggie. I am a huge fan of Daniel and David’s work, and the chance to collaborate with them on such a landmark production is something I am insanely excited about.”

Taylor spent a decade in the indie duo Slow Club and released her solo debut album as Self Esteem, Compliments Please, in 2019. It was followed by Prioritise Pleasure, named the best album of 2021 by Guardian music critics. Taylor made her theatrical debut as Sally Bowles in Cabaret at the Playhouse in London in 2023. Next month marks the publication of her first book, A Complicated Woman, billed as “a cathartic scream … that gets to the heart of being a woman in the world today”.

I can’t think of anything more exciting than watching Rebecca Lucy Taylor and Daniel Raggett strip the varnish off my old play,” Hare said. “It’s a perfect moment to see if a new generation responds to that 70s mix of hope, drugs, music, sex and despair.”

Teeth ’n’ Smiles was first staged at the Royal Court in 1975, with a cast including Antony Sher, and transferred to the West End the following year. The role of Maggie was compared to Janis Joplin, and the Guardian’s Michael Billington wrote that Hare “captures precisely that moment in a culture when a dream explodes. Like John Osborne in The Entertainer, he realises there is poetry and pathos in the spectacle of decline”.

It is not strange for artists to step onto the stage. Will Young, Beverley Knight, Emma Bunton and Melanie C are among those who have appeared in theatrical productions. I think most are musical theatre productions. The rebel play, Teeth 'n' Smiles, has musical moments, though it is not a technically a musical. It is rare for artists to step outside of musical theatre when we think of stage performances. One of the most notable transitions of the past few years is when Cheryl appeared in 2:22: A Ghost Story in 2023. Playing a new mother, Jenny, in Danny Robins’s supernatural story, this was a role previously played by Lily Allen. I am not sure if there are doubts and cynicism when artists step onto the stage. There are theatre snobs and critics who feel it is maybe stunt casting or someone stepping outside of their arena. Although Cheryl’s performance was acclaimed, I guess a lot of it falls on the quality of the production and the other actors. One downside might be too much focus and pressure being on this high-profile musician appearing on the stage. Maybe that takes away from the ensemble and the play’s direction and writing. However, I do think that it is hugely impressive when artists go into theatre. Maybe a lot more daunting and harder to do a performance that is not musical and is dark or quite heavy-hitting, I wonder how many others from music will transfer to the stage. Rebecca Lucy Taylor is someone who has this relationship with the stage. She also composed the score for the Jodie Comer-starring Prima Facie. The Suzie Miller play won Comer an Olivier, and there is a national tour of the production next year.

Perhaps it is more common in the U.S., but a host of American artist have appeared in acclaimed productions there. From Brandy Norwood to Sting to Josh Groban to Michelle Williams, again, a lot of these performance are musical theatre. I guess Teeth ‘n’ Smiles is close to musical theatre. About a failing Rock band, fronted by the Janis Joplin-like Maggie Frisby, performing at Jesus College's May Ball in 1969, things descends into chaos as the clash between the band and the academics highlights the end of the optimistic 1960s counter-culture. Rather than it being musical theatre, I see it closer in town to a new production like Stereophonic: The play follows a fictional rock band (very much based around Fleetwood Mac and their Rumours period) on the cusp of superstardom as they struggle through recording their new album set from 1976 to 1977. It is just a subject I am curious about. Also, what skills and attributes can Rebecca Lucy Taylor take from these theatrical experiences into her music? Does she have this extra edge and level because of what she has picked up from these productions? Perhaps so? Also, did she take a lot of her natural and years-long talents and instincts and ably and phenomenally triumph on the stage? Again, I think so. I think that Rebecca Lucy Taylor will be simply electric when she appears in Teeth ‘n’ Smiles. It will be an accomplished and extraordinary performance from…

A tremendous talent.

FEATURE: The Reggae Kite: The Artists and Influences in Kate Bush’s Music

FEATURE:

 

 

The Reggae Kite

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1978/PHOTO CREDIT: Gered Mankowitz

 

The Artists and Influences in Kate Bush’s Music

__________

A slightly short feature…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush circa 1980

I have been thinking about characters in Kate Bush’s work. This is research ahead of a possible book. To see if there is enough to write about. There are plenty of people mentioned in her songs. Named or anonymous, Bush is very much influenced by people. That is what drives and fascinates her. It is not only the characters she includes in her songs. There are artists who she loves or listened to that goes into the songs. That might have shifted later in life. I think up to and including Aerial in 2005, there were touches of other artists. Definitely up to The Red Shoes in 1993. Even though Bush brought in other musicians to albums after The Red Shoes in 1993 or Aerial in 2005, could you listen to songs from those albums, and 2011’s Director’s Cut and 50 Words for Snow, and say they are influenced by other artists? Maybe this is Kate Bush paying tribute to another artist? It is debatable. Definitely, earlier in her career, Bush was driven by other artists. Kate Bush got compared to artists like Laura Nyro and Joni Mitchell. Even though she was compared to those artists, I don’t think that she really was channelling them. You can listen to The Kick Inside and Lionheart and hear shades of those artists. It is only natural for artists, over their early career, to include nods to other artists. Either those who they love or feel add something to the mix. In the case of Kate Bush, as I have explored in previous features, she grew up around a lot of different music. From Roy Harper and English Folk to Irish music, Roxy Music, Elton John, Captain Beefheart and Pink Floyd, you can hear some of this in Kate Bush’s music. I have talked about some songs on The Kick Inside and Never for Ever, where Pink Floyd’s influence can be heard. The Saxophone Song on The Kick Inside and Breathing on Never for Ever. Not a pastiche or heavily leaning on them, you can tell that this band were in her mind when she was writing these tracks. The spritely piano riff on James and the Cold Gun from The Kick Inside, I feel, was Bush’s nod to Steely Dan. That entire track has a Dan quality to it. The band also inspired other moments in Kate Bush’s cannon. A slight hint of Steely Dan on Never for Ever’s Blow Away (for Bill). If not in the lyrics then parts of the compositions, as MOJO suggested.

It is interesting looking at various tracks and noticing spots of other artists. If not in the sound then maybe the title. I have just been writing about The Red Shoes and the lead track, Rubberband Girl, obviously takes its title from The Spinners’ 1976 hit, The Rubberband Man. There are cases where Kate Bush has written songs inspired by distinct artists that people have not picked up on. I want to bring in this article, where Kate Bush discusses Wow (from 1978’s Lionheart) and the inspiration behind the song. Even though she says it was her first go at writing a Pink Floyd song, listen to the end of The Saxophone Song and you can tell this was influenced by Pink Floyd. That cosmic outro definitely channels them! Even so, as she explains, other tracks with distinct artists at their core passed a lot of people by:

‘Wow’ is a song about the music business, not just rock music but show business in general, including acting and theatre. People say that the music business is about ripoffs, the rat race, competition, strain, people trying to cut you down, and so on, and though that’s all there, there’s also the magic. It was sparked off when I sat down to try and write a Pink Floyd song, something spacey; Though I’m not surprised no-one has picked that up, it’s not really recognisable as that, in the same way as people haven’t noticed that ‘Kite’ is a Bob Marley song, and ‘Don’t Push Your Foot On The Heartbrake’ is a Patti Smith song. When I wrote it I didn’t envisage performing it – the performance when it happened was an interpretation of the words I’d already written. I first made up the visuals in a hotel room in New Zealand, when I had half an hour to make up a routine and prepare for a TV show. I sat down and listened to the song through once, and the whirling seemed to fit the music. Those who were at the last concert of the tour at Hammersmith must have noticed a frogman appear through the dry ice it was one of the crew’s many last night ‘pranks’ and was really amazing. I’d have liked to have had it in every show.

Kate Bush Club newsletter, Summer 1979”.

I did know about Don’t Push Your Foot on the Heartbrake and Kite. The former is from Lionheart. I didn’t peg Kate Bush for a Patti Smith fan! However, you listen to the song and you can hear her influence come through. I love to imagine Kate Bush listening to Bob Marley! As a teenager in her bedroom spinning a record by Bob Marley & The Wailers! Bush experiment with Reggae at other times in her career. Kite is from The Kick Inside. Another track on that album, Them Heavy People, has a touch of Reggae to it. Maybe not Bob Marley per se, but one of his contemporaries. Beyond obvious musicians that she loved and guided her, such as David Bowie and Elton John, there are more obscure or less obvious ones that she was touched by. I listen to Them Heavy People and actually hear a bit of Ska or Two Tone. Maybe The Specials or Madness woven in. Bush is a singular and original artist, though within this comes some distinct guidance from other artists. Critics who did not pick up on the references to Patti Smith and Bob Marley in 1978 also missed the Pink Floyd inspiration on Wow. Did this continue later in her career? Delve into The Dreaming and that world. Kate Bush has said how a lot of the percussion sound on that album was motivated by Peter Gabriel and the work he was doing at Townhouse Studios. There are bits of Lodger-era David Bowie in Sat in Your Lap. A Bowie-esque track, I feel! Get Out of My House, the final track on The Dreaming, could be a mix of various influences. There is something Punk about it. Raw and visceral, one feels that Bush was channelling a combination of Punk artists like Sex Pistols with a bit of her own version of that genre. Definitely, one can hear Captain Beefheart and the more avant-garde side of her record collection through other tracks on that album. Perhaps more delicate and less obvious than earlier references, other sounds and artists played a role throughout.

Kate Bush said how the first single from The Dreaming, Sat in Your Lap, was inspired by Stevie Wonder during a concert she saw in London. A case of another artist having an impact on a song. We rightly commend and salute Kate Bush as this innovator and artists who has influenced so many others. Even if Kate Bush said in her later career that she does not listen to other people’s music when writing albums, I guess you can listen back to some of her albums and detect the importance of other artists. Whether consciously trying to write a song in their style or a subconscious I have been thinking about the split between, say The Kick Inside up to The Dreaming and Hounds of Love to the present day. Whether musical influences were more on the fringes for those later albums and more at the core for the earlier ones? Is that natural for every artist. Legends and newcomers alike operate this way I think. However, if we dig into her work in the 2000s and 2010s, I am sure there will be a song here and there where we can see the colours of another artist. It got me thinking when looking at that article for Wow and how this was Kate Bush channelling Pink Floyd. How Bob Marley and Patti Smith were referenced in other songs. I have suggested a bit of Steely Dan in one song. Billie Holiday is an artist Bush admired and I can even feel her touch in some of the vocal performance on Aerial and 50 Words for Snow.

Folk-influenced songs earlier in her career have a suggestion of Simon & Garfunkel. Kate Bush was a huge fan of The Beatles and actually said how much she admired their underrated 1967 E.P./soundtrack, Magical Mystery Tour. You can hear the kaleidoscopic and psychedelic tones of that work in some of her tracks. Lionheart’s Coffee Homeground comes to mind. In a recent feature from Far Out Magazine, it is clear that The Beatles influenced Kate Bush on every level: “It’s one thing to have a bit of musical influence from The Beatles, but Hounds of Love is the most obvious example of Bush using the Fab mentality. Much like Abbey Road’s second side is constructed like a medley of different tunes, The Ninth Wave, on the flipside of Bush’s magnum opus, takes that mentality one step further by crafting a storyline of a woman lost at sea after her boat crashes”. Maybe people will have their own theories and suggestions. This does sound like I am trying to reduce Kate Bush’s work to the point of parody or copycatting. Quite the opposite! Every single artist has influence and nothing is completely free of other artists’ work. Those Kate Bush admired borrowed from others and were influenced by them. Kate Bush motivated to write songs because of other artists. It is wonderful to hear. I have probably missed some examples so, if you notice any, please let me know. Shades and tones of other wonderful artists flying and flowing in…

THAT diamond kite.

FEATURE: I’m Gonna Dance the Dream: Kate Bush’s The Red Shoes at Thirty-Two

FEATURE:

 

 

I’m Gonna Dance the Dream

 

Kate Bush’s The Red Shoes at Thirty-Two

__________

THIS is the sole feature I will write…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1993

about the upcoming thirty-second anniversary of Kate Bush’s seventh studio album, The Red Shoes. Fans will be aware of the background. Released on 1st November, 1993, The Red Shoes followed 1989’s The Sensual World. Think about her trajectory and changes from 1985’s Hounds of Love to 1993’s The Red Shoes. Hounds of Love being this incredibly ambitious and phenomenal album that was both of the 1980s but ahead of its time. The Sensual World was not to repeat that. Coming at the end of the decade, instead, this was Kate Bush composing music that was more feminine. Hounds of Love had a lot of primal and masculine energy. So too did 1982’s The Dreaming. The Sensual World is more autumnal and sensuous. Not as percussive or epic as Hounds of Love. Perhaps more personal and coming from the perspective of a woman entering her thirties – Bush turned thirty in 1988; the year before The Sensual World was released -, her only album of the 1990s perhaps struggled to find its feet. The production could not quite be how it was on previous albums. Trying to fit into the times and also be distinctly Kate Bush, there were questions about its sound and quality. Whether Bush’s heart and head were committed. Even though she experienced loss and separation just before the album came out and around the time, when writing most of the songs, these events had not happened. Even so, taking on a lot at a time when she could feel strains and tragedy looming or at least showing their first signs, The Red Shoes is not viewed as one of Kate Bush’s best albums. Regardless, I still think it is a lot better than people give it credit for. There is a lot to love about it. Even though this was the first album where Kate Bush did not appear – she has not since appeared on an album cover – and we only see a pair of feet. Granted, they are Bush’s feet. In a photograph taken by her brother, John Carder Bush, that slightly mystery or disappearing out of frame was a sign of what was to come.

After The Red Shoes was released in 1993, Bush started to retreat from the public eye. I often feel, as The Red Shoes is inspired by the film of the 1948 same name, that the album cover was like a film poster. Honing in on the focal point of the title. Also, having been exposed and very much on a promotional treadmill since 1978, Bush did not necessarily want to be at the centre of things. The cover is great. The sequencing is a letdown and means that we have an album that is top and middle-heavy. In terms of the tracks, a few of her very best numbers are on The Red Shoes. Including the title track, Lily, Moments of Pleasure and Eat the Music, there are very few weak cuts. Also, despite the fact The Red Shoes does not sound like anything else released in 1993 and it does not try to fit in, I think that works in its favour. Kate Bush did strip down and rework some of the songs from The Red Shoes for 2011’s Director’s Cut. I would like to see The Red Shoes’ songs in their original state, though with a different sound. Maybe stripped down and remixed, just so that these incredible songs are not as compressed, tinny and a product of 1990s production. That would be interesting. There are precious few features or retrospectives concerning The Red Shoes. Given the somewhat muted and lacklustre reaction in 1993 from critics, maybe that is not a shock. The Red Shoes did reach number two in the U.K. and an impressive twenty-eight in the U.S. In April 2024, Eat the Music was re-released on a 10" vinyl record for Record Store Day, featuring B-sides Lily and Big Stripey Lie from the original album. The Red Shoes has perhaps the broadest and most eclectic collection of featured guests. From Lenny Henry, Prince, the Trio Bulgarka, Lily Cornford, Eric Clapton, Jeff Beck and Nigel Kennedy, it is clear that it is a lot more crowded than most of her albums. Perhaps a few too many featured artists and contributors. Does Kate Bush’s voice and singularity shine through enough?!

I want to go to a couple of promotional interviews from 1993. In a decade of lad and ladette culture, and with Britpop starting to show shoots in that year, how did they react to an artist like Kate Bush? A mainstay who started making music in the 1970s, I still don’t think she was afforded the sort of respect that she had earned at this point. Rock Compact Disc spoke with Kate Bush in 1993:

Del's enthusiasm for his musical partner's work is infectious. In contrast, Bush herself is reserved when it comes to anything except her music. Ask her about the technicalities of recording using her Fairlight computer system and she'll tell you exactly about how her songs come about. When it comes to explaining the stories behind the songs, however, or talking about Kate Bush, the person, she is uniquely retiring. But when it comes to her music, Bush has spent many years developing a skill for getting what she wants - a skill that she's developed into a fine art. She speaks gently and slowly, picking her words carefully, looking almost frail and innocent as her expressive wide eyes stare in wonderment. But her delicate looks and tiny frame belie her drive and power - not many artists of any stature get to be so creatively in control as Kate Bush. For her, though, it is and always has been the number one priority. 'I think creative control is so incredibly important,' she says. 'If you don't have that control your work will be interfered with until it's gone out of your hands. I was always aware that things wouldn't be how I wanted them unless I was willing to fight.

Kate's involvement in what was known as the KT Bush Band was always going to be shortlived, as Del and his other musical collaborators realised, but they were happy to support her until that moment EMI were ready to whisk her off to fame and fortune. 'Right at the end of that period of playing the pub gigs in that band, we did a session for EMI at the White Elephant on the River,' he recalls, 'which was her first major showcase for the whole record company. It was quite nerve-racking for the rest of us, but Kate just breezed on and sang it. She breezed through the whole thing - it was really quite amazing.

'She always had this total self-belief in what she was going to do - there was never going to be any problem for her, from her own point of view. It was like an obsessive passion that she just had to go through. And in a lot of ways she's still like it now.' Of course, after that it was never quite the same for the KT Bush band without Katy Bush, and Del and Co were left stranded in temporary musical limbo while Kate was studio-bound. At that stage, Kate was too young and inexperienced to insist they play on her debut - 'she had to toe the party line a little,' says Del - so the producer bought his own players in to provide the necessary backing. However, even then Bush knew what she wanted and how to get it across. He may not have played on her debut LP, but Kate made sure Del got to design the artwork for the back of the sleeve, and that LP number two would have his name somewhere on the playing credits. 'She really wanted us to play on that album, but politically it wasn't right/he says. 'But when the second album came along in '78, we were able to do a few tracks - she really stuck out for us. I'm really grateful for that she's given me, personally, so many breaks.'

Bush is reluctant to go into details on her relationship with her uniquely understanding record comapany. Although obviously appreciative of the artistic freedom she's gained over the years she also observes: 'You have to fight for everything you want. Struggle is important. It's how you grow and how you change.'

Caught up in the first flush of success, Kate's early days were a flurry of activity and creative release. In 1978, both The Kick Inside and Lionheart albums were released, and in 1979 she embarked on her first and only, and now fairly legendary, live tour. 'As I remember it, it was very hard work,' says Del of the tour. 'I've never worked so hard as a musician before. We rehearsed for six months. In the morning she was coming up to town for dance lessons and learning dance routines, then in the afternoon we'd rehearse the band for six hours, then in the evening we were going back for production meetings. And she's still doing that kind of thing now with this film she's doing. She's a complete workaholic and a fanatic where her music's concerned.' Did she enjoy the tour? 'She really enjoyed it. It's a common fallacy that she didn't and that it was a bad experience for her, but she really enjoyed doing it. But I think what happened was, it took so much out of her, that it also took a little bit of her self-confidence. She then got into the studio immediately after that tour ended, in late '79, to start the third album, and she then got into producing. She co-produced it with the engineer she was working with at the time, and got completely into it. She thought, this is it, I really need to work in the studio for a few years and develop my own production techniques and music as a studio musician.' And Kate realised too that she'd have to distance herself from outside pressures to achieve what she wanted to achieve.

'I've always been tenacious when it comes to my work,' she says. 'And I became quickly aware of the outside pressures of being famous affecting my work. It seemed ironic that I was expected to do interviews and television work which took me away from the thing that had put me into that situation. It was no longer relevant that I wrote songs. I could see my work becoming something that had no thought in it, becoming a personality, which is never what I wanted. All I wanted was the creative process.' 'She's the most unlikely star,' adds Del. 'She does not like being famous, she really does not like it. She wants to be an ordinary person, but she wants to make music. She likes the idea of people getting something from what she does, but she doesn't want the fame aspect. She's not the sort of person who will ever go out clubbing. She just works, stays at home, goes to the theatre, goes to see films, and when she can she goes off on holiday. But that's very rare.'

It's hard to imagine Kate Bush padding around the house with her slippers on, but even superstars have to recharge their batteries. 'She really just lets herself go. I don't mean she puts on 30 stone. It's like "I'm not working any more, so I'm not going to let any of this stuff get into my head". She potters in the garden - she does gardening now - she watches TV, goes to the theatre, eats... And takes in a little music too... 'She doesn't like to listen to anything when she's working, but when she's resting she listens to lots of stuff. At the moment, she's really into Talk Talk - she finds a real affinity with them. And we had a whole period of getting into this Bulgarian music, and in the early days it was Irish music. Generally, there's not many modern bands she's into, though she likes the Utah Saints. They did a track with a piece of her vocal in it: they were really good about it, went through all the proper channels, asked if they could use it, gave her a royalty, and she thought it was great. She thought it was absolutely fantastic the way they'd actually used it. In fact, one time she thought it would be great to do something with them. It never came to pass, though...'

What did happen was the extended period of inactivity that lead to a four year gap between the last album 'The Sensual World, and the release of The Red Shoes. Beset by personal tragedy - the loss of many friends, the death of her mother and the breakdown of her personal, if not professional, relationship with Del- the creative process simply stopped. 'I just couldn't work,' she says. 'Singng is such a deeply personal thing to do, I couldn't manage it.' 'There's been a lot of upset,' adds Del, 'When her mother died, she really couldn't work for the best part of a year. But she soon got the urge to get back in there again. She has to work.' And when Bush works, she really works. Not content with producing just another LP, she's timed its release with the simultaneous release of an accompanying 50-minute film 'We've taken six tracks from the album and made a story line up from the title track.'

'It's about how Kate's a dancer and gets tricked into wearing a pair of red shoes, which are possessed and can't stop dancing,' adds Del, 'it's a bit like the old film, 'The Red Shoes (the 1948 British classic about a young ballerina torn between two lovers - one a struggling composer the other an autocratic dance impresario). It's her own interpretation of the idea. There's lots of dialogue, and Miranda Richardson and Lindsay Kemp are in it too. Kate's been busy writing the storyline and getting it organised.'

'It's something like Magical Mystery Tour,' Kate adds, 'But it's not like it at all. It's not finished I hate talking about anything until it's there. like talking to you about the album if you haven't heard the tracks. Completely ridiculous.'

Never one to explain herself when a well-turned musical phrase will do, Kate Bush remains something of an enigma; intensely private, guarded to the point of introversion, but always fantastically unique”.

There are horrendous interviews like this from Chrissie Iley from The Sunday London Times, which shows you what Kate Bush had to endure! It is no wonder she waited twelve more years to follow The Red Shoes given the sort of promotion she had to endure! People who didn’t really listen to the music or were completely uninterested and insulting. The second interview I want to include, again, shows the kind of inane and rather insulting questions and lines of query. Nick Coleman chatted with Kate Bush for Time Out:

The Red Shoes' is a ballet film made by Powell and Emeric Pressburger in 1948, telling the story of a dancer who is torn between the demands of a great impresario, who can help her to become an artist of destiny, and those of her composer/husband, who can bring her happiness. The story elides an old fairy tale and a take on the power struggle that raged between the dancer Nijinsky and Diaghilev, first director of the Ballet Russe. Bush says the song evolved out of a feeling she had one day at the piano of music running away with itself. The image in her mind 'was like horses galloping and running away, with the horses turned into running feet, and then shoes galloping away with themselves'. Which corresponded, conveniently enough, with the key fairy-tale element in the Powell film: the red pumps worn by the tragic ballerina, which are imbued with a magic that carries their wearer off in a terrible outpouring of expressiveness.

Bush contacted Powell shortly before he died, 'to see whether he'd be interested in working with me. He was the most charming man, so charming. He wanted to hear my music, so I sent him some cassettes and we exchanged letters occasionally, and I got a chance to meet him not so long before he died. He left a really strong impression on me, as much as a person as for his work. He was just one of those very special spirits, almost magical in a way. Left me with a big influence.'

Which makes some kind of sense. Powell's super-rich three-strip Technicolor, his English-ness, his 'expressiveness', his interest in the shadows cast by daylight; even, you could argue, his thematic preoccupation with islands, solitary souls and the unconfined spirit; these are some of Bush's favourite things.

'His work is just so... so beautiful,' says Kate, in her tiniest voice.

Meaning what, exactly?

'Well, there's such heart in his films. The way he portrayed women... that was particularly good and very interesting. His women are strong and they're treated as people...'

That's one kind of beauty.

'The heart, I think, is the main beauty. This human quality he has. Although there's clever shots in his films, they're not really used for effect, to be clever. They're used for an emotional effect. I'd call that a human quality. Like vulnerability. Also, I like the emotional qualities of the characters. I suppose in one way they're very English ...'

To combine her interest in Powell with her lust for new directions, and perhaps to solve one or two promotional problems, Bush has directed a 40-minute film interpreting six songs from the excellent 'Red Shoes' album. It will be premiered at the London Film Festival.

'I'll be very interested to see what people make of it. To see whether they regard it as a long promo video or as a short film,' she says.

Where do your stories come from?

'Oh, all kinds of sources but generally they come down to people. People's ideas or works. Films, books, they all lead back to someone else's ideas, which in turn lead back to someone's else's ideas...'

I've always assumed you must be a bit of an Angela Carter fan.

'Um, no. I don't think I know her stuff.'

She wrote 'Company Of Wolves' and was big, I believe, on pomegranates, the predatory nature of nature, the heat of female sexuality; that sort of thing.

'Oh, yes.' Bush smiles, and her dimple disappears.

Other post addressed to Kate Bush arrived which went unopened. Then one day a letter came for the attention of Catherine Earnshaw. This being ambiguous, Catherine opened it just to make sure. Inside was a note from a Harley Street doctor indicating that Catherine was fit as a fiddle. This was good news. Unfortunately, Catherine had not been to see a Harley Street doctor. She hastily sent the letter on to Bush's record company, blushing at her daftness in not remembering immediately that Catherine Earnshaw is the name of the storm-tossed tragic heroine of 'Wuthering Heights '.

You're 35 and you've been doing this since you were a teenager. How have you changed?

'I think I've changed quite a lot. Essentially I'm still the same person but I suppose I've grown up a lot, and learned a lot.'

What's made you grow up the most?

'You get lots of disappointments. I'm not sure that they make you grow up but they make you question intentions.' She pauses. 'But life is what makes you grow up.'

That's a fantastically evasive answer.

'It is quite evasive but I think it's true.' Still no dimple. 'It's hard to say... when I was young I was very idealistic, and I don't really think I am any more. I think I'm more... realistic. I think it's good to change. I think I'd be unhappy if I didn't change. It would mean I hadn't learnt anything.'

Do you ever get curious about living another way?

'I do. But so far I'm extremely lucky to be doing what I'm doing. I feel extremely lucky to have the opportunity to do it.’”.

I would advise any Kate Bush fan to buy The Red Shoes. It is an album that does not get the love it deserves. In 2018, Ben Hewitt wrote a feature for The Quietus marking twenty-five years of The Red Shoes. Often maligned and discussed, this album, as he writes, has so much to recommend. Some incredible music that needs to be reassessed and addressed. A fascinating chapter in Kate Bush’s career:

The most powerful moments on The Red Shoes are its most intimate and personal. ‘Moments Of Pleasure’ starts with piano so soft and gentle it feels like it might vanish if you breathe too hard, before it’s swept up in Michael Kamen’s elegantly soul-stirring orchestral arrangement. Bush’s voice goes through a similar transformation, too, growing from a gentle flutter to something stronger, which makes her heartfelt cry on the chorus sound like a defiant refusal to be swallowed by grief: “Just being alive/ It can really hurt/ And these moments/ Are a gift from time.” Its outro remembers some of Bush’s lost friends – including guitarist Alan Murphy, producer John Barrett and lighting director Bill Duffield – and plays out like the closing credits of an old-fashioned weepy. Even more devastating is an old conversation she recalls with her mother, Hannah, who was ill while Bush was writing the song and who passed away before the album was released. “I can hear my mother saying ‘Every old sock needs an old shoe,’” remembers Bush warmly. “Isn’t that a great saying?” It is, even if it sticks a tennis ball-sized lump in your throat.

There’s emotional heft on ‘Top Of The City’, too, which takes a similar premise to ‘And So Is Love’ but adds higher stakes: Bush sits up in the skies, looking down at the lonely city below and hoping to find an answer. “I don’t know if I’m closer to Heaven, but it looks like Hell down there,” she declares, caught between exhilaration, melancholy and desperation: the moments of quiet calm are both beautiful and unsettling, with eerie pockets of silence hanging between delicate piano notes, until there’s a big, dramatic burst of violins and celestial backing vocals. “I don’t know if you’ll love me for it,” she yells wildly, forcing the moment to its crisis. “But I don’t think we should suffer for this/ There’s just one thing we can do about it.”

Hearing her equate emotional intimacy with scoffing mangoes and plums might suggest that The Red Shoes still has plenty of idiosyncrasies. There’s certainly something quintessentially Bushian about some of its songs, including the title cut, which soundtracks the fate of a girl who puts on a pair of red leather ballet shoes and dances a frantic Irish jig: it combines her fondness for Celtic sounds, old stories and classic film (The Red Shoes was written by Hans Christian Andersen and later adapted into a 1948 film directed by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, the former of whom Bush salutes on ‘Moments Of Pleasure’), and her shrill, possessed vocal makes it sound like a feverish fairytale. The steamy ‘The Song Of Solomon’, meanwhile, mixes a literary text and desire in the same way that ‘The Sensual World’ let Ulysses’ Molly Boom step off the page and experience physical pleasure. This time, there was no-one stopping Bush lifting lines from her chosen book, the Hebrew Bible, although the erotic charge of the chorus is all hers: “Don’t want your bullshit, yeah/ Just want your sexuality.”

That’s then followed by the absurdity of ‘Why Should I Love You?’ Bush had originally asked Prince to record backing vocals for the track, but he decided to take it apart and add guitars, keyboards and brass, too. Conventional wisdom is that great collaborations are the result of a shared vision, but ‘Why Should I Love You?’ is great even though there’s absolutely no shared vision whatsoever: for the first 60-odd seconds it’s built around Bush’s hushed vocal, until Prince’s huge rush of ecstatic, kaleidoscopic sound steamrolls everything in its path. It’s less the meeting of two minds and more the smashing together of two completely different styles, the most special of cut-and-shunt hybrids. (And somewhere, among all the hullabaloo, you’ll also hear backing vocals from Lenny Henry).

There’s another cameo on the closing song, the fantastically histrionic breakup ballad ‘You’re The One’, on which Jeff Beck’s dizzying, drawn-out guitar solo pushes Bush to an exhausting catharsis. Like so much of The Red Shoes, it finds her preparing to leave a lover to save herself, although this time she’s less bullish, more prone to tying herself in knots. “I’m going to stay with my friend/ Mmm, yes, he’s very good-looking,” she admits. “The only trouble is, he’s not you.” By the song’s end, she’s so frazzled by frustration and anguish that she lets rip a larynx-tearing shriek: “Just forget it, alright!” Bush, who had spoken of feeling emotionally burnt-out years before the album was released, was ready to withdraw, too: she vanished for 12 years until Aerial, and then went on hiatus for another six before returning with Director’s Cut. “I think there’s always a long, lingering dissatisfaction with everything I’ve done,” she said in 2011, glad to have the chance to right some of the wrongs that had been bothering her for 20-odd years. For me, though, the original album has always been enough: it might have its flaws, and there might be a handsome alternative, but just like Bush on ‘You’re The One’, I still want to keep going back”.

On 1st November, it will be thirty-two years since The Red Shoes was released. I have a lot of time for the album and love so many of the tracks. I doubt it will have anything written about it until maybe 2028, when it turns thirty-five. That is a pity. It is an album that I can come back to…

TIME and time again.

FEATURE: Kate Bush: Something Like a Song: Hammer Horror (Lionheart)

FEATURE:

 

 

Kate Bush: Something Like a Song

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1978/PHOTO CREDIT: Gered Mankowitz

 

Hammer Horror (Lionheart)

__________

I am tying this in with…

the anniversary of the first track from Kate Bush’s second studio album, Lionheart. I am going to do an anniversary feature about the album ahead of 10th November. On 3rd November, it will be forty-seven years since Hammer Horror was released. As I have stated in previous features about the song, it might have seemed like an unusual choice as lead single. With Wow as one of the options – that was the second single released -, Bush and EMI went in with something perhaps a little less commercial. However, Hammer Horror was internationally. However, it only reached forty-four in the U.K. Perhaps the public were expecting something similar to the singles from her 1978 debut, The Kick Inside. An adjustment was required. However, this temporary chart blip was corrected when Wow was released and reached fourteen in the U.K. Lionheart was an album that reached six in the U.K. It gained mostly mixed reviews. After releasing The Kick Incise in February, most artists would have needed a year or so to work on new material and perhaps tour the album before rather than create a new one. EMI felt that a quick follow-up to The Kick Inside was best. Bush would tour both of those albums in 1979 for The Tour of Life. However, in  spite of its rushed nature, Lionheart has many gems. Hammer Horror among them. It is a shame reviews for Hammer Horror were lukewarm. Kate Bush Encyclopedia provide some resources:

Radio 1’s Round Table on October 27, 1978 the single was reviewed by DJ’s John Peel (“I didn’t like the album at all and I’m not too enthused with this either”) and Paul Gambaccini (“It doesn’t grab me immediately as The Man With The Child In His Eyes“).

“Kate keeps up the formula and doesn’t upset the fans… sounds like Joni Mitchell popping tabs with the LSO. Offbeat, quirky and all that stuff…

Ronnie Gurr, Record Mirror, 11 November 1978

Ominous post ELO orchestration with the unrequited lust of a broken affair viewed as living dead love-bites-back as in classic 50’s British celluloid, a real nail biter, hypnotic and disconcerting.

Tony Parsons, NME, 11 November 1978”.

I am going to repeat something I brought in for previous features about Hammer Horror. It is important to provide context for this song. A hugely important moment. The first single after The Kick Inside was released. It is back to the Kate Bush Encyclopedia for some interview archive:

The song is not about, as many think, Hammer Horror films. It is about an actor and his friend. His friend is playing the lead in a production of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, a part he’s been reading all his life, waiting for the chance to play it. He’s finally got the big break he’s always wanted, and he is the star. After many rehearsals he dies accidentally, and the friend is asked to take the role over, which, because his own career is at stake, he does. The dead man comes back to haunt him because he doesn’t want him to have the part, believing he’s taken away the only chance he ever wanted in life. And the actor is saying, “Leave me alone, because it wasn’t my fault – I have to take this part, but I’m wondering if it’s the right thing to do because the ghost is not going to leave me alone and is really freaking me out. Every time I look round a corner he’s there, he never disappears.”
The song was inspired by seeing James Cagney playing the part of Lon Chaney playing the hunchback – he was an actor in an actor in an actor, rather like Chinese boxes, and that’s what I was trying to create.

Kate Bush Club Newsletter, November 1979”.

It is interesting that both Hammer Horror and Wow refer to acting. Stagecraft and different sides of acting. Well, it is about the music industry as well. How people try to cut you down and rip you off. But there is also the magic. I do love the lyrics for Hammer Horror. So vivid and original: “You stood in the belltower/But now you’re gone/So who knows all the sights/Of Notre Dame?/They’ve got the stars for the gallant hearts/I’m the replacement for your part/But all I want to do is forget/You, friend”. It is amazing that not much has been written about Hammer Horror. People do not really explore the singles.

I am going to come to a Dreams of Orgonon feature that I have included parts of before. I want to highlight what they say about the campness and Gothic nature of the song. How this is quite different to anything on The Kick Inside, yet Hammer Horror was demoed in 1976. This is a song that is fascinating to unpack. In terms of what Bush says with the lyrics and the role she plays in the song. The vocal range of the track. There is so much depth and detail in Hammer Horror. A shame, then, that it was written off by many when it came out. Those who wanted a repeat of what she wrote for The Kick Inside:

There’s also an element of musical gender play at work in “Hammer Horror.” Bush chooses a male story with a masculine narrator and tells it through a feminine perspective with dashes of camp. This is where her “actor in an actor” fascination comes in. She’s telling someone’s story and embellishing it in radical ways. If Mick Jagger sang this track, it’d be him spitting autobiographically at Keith Richards, who would reply with some vicious chords in open D. Bush plays the actor as a frightened damsel, terrified of the stranger in the dark. She begins the song with a trembling “yooooouuu stoooood,” moving down her vocal range for a more playful “they’ve got the stars for the gallant hearts” (the most innocent confession of pissing oneself ever put on record), howl-belting out “HAMMER HOR-ROR” for the chorus, and lapsing into a more classically Bushian “are we really sure about this” in the post-chorus. It’s the most daring Bush vocal we’ve heard on this blog so far. No male artist would go this far in 1978.

What else do those vocals point to? I don’t know, umm, how about the fact that this is the most camp thing ever? Bush maintains some reverence for her Gothic source material, but not without a tongue-in-cheek performance. Her vocal for “Hammer Horror” is full-blown melodrama, containing, as Goth scholar Andi Harriman puts it, the Goth subculture’s commitment to dramaticism, or “transforming yourself into a different form of beauty.” Bush’s vocal range swerves up and down, covering C#6, Bb5, and descending to the lows of F#5 and F5. The song is absurdly eclectic and committed to its shtick, containing a licking guitar and a full-blown string section tensely opening the song and carrying the chorus. Musically, it’s full-blown hedonism. Visually, it’s another story altogether.

I mean, look at that music video. Bush is dressed in black while dancing with a man (presumably dancer Stewart Avon-Arnold) and expressing nearly every note of the song with obsessive literalism. When she sings about a hand reaching out from the dark to grab her, sure enough she gurns at a mysterious hand. Indeed she gurns at everything in the music video — Bush will remain a world class gurner until she develops a more understated relationship with the camera (and thus many great GIFs were lost to the world). Until then, this is the standard for camp Bush videos. It is utterly absurd and completely delightful.

Now we’re discussing camp, we might as well discuss the real ghost haunting this essay: Goth rock. It’s uncontroversial to say that Kate Bush is not Goth. She’s too separate from the Goth subculture in terms of aesthetic, class, and musicality to claim to membership. However Bush is, as we noted earlier, not averse to engaging with the Gothic. She launched her career on it. Naturally there’s going to be some overlap with Goth rock.

 One of the most surprising things about Bush is how she’ll often stumble on an aesthetic before anyone else and perform it in a way that sounds nothing like its more famous iterations. “Hammer Horror” was demoed in 1976 and released in 1978, when the Goth scene was beginning to cohere as a subculture. When it was released as a single in October, Joy Division had recently put out an EP, Siouxsie and the Banshees had cracked the Top Ten with “Hong Kong Garden,” The Cure had recorded but not yet released “Killing an Arab,” (yes much orientalism) and early iterations of Bauhaus were playing Northampton clubs. Goth wasn’t a salient cultural movement, but it was beginning to look like a separate scene from punk and even standard forms of post-punk (e.g. Gang of Four, Magazine). While this was going on, Bush had charted multiple times with three singles and two albums. She existed in a different sphere from Siouxsie and Peter Murphy. So why comment on the similarities at all?

There’s also of course the visual similarity between Bush and the Gothic, with dark clothing and dark make-up cast against white faces (Bush and Goth both have complex relationships with race). But the two paths leads to different conclusions. Goth rock artists were interested in abjection, descending into the gutter. Bush, for all her winking at the camera, imitates her Gothic subject in a way that preserves reverence for it. These approaches aren’t diametrically opposed — they form an intersection instead of a metro running over a motorway. Bush just stumbled on some fresh cultural ideas at the same time as some other dramatically minded young musicians. She navigates her way out of the Gothic avenue into another street altogether — she resolves the tension of influence and anxiety by doing something weirder.

Demoed at 44 Wickham Road, Brockley in 1976. Recorded at Super Bear Studios in Berres-les-Alpes, France between July and September 1978. Personnel: Kate Bush — vocals, piano, production. Andrew Powell — production, harmonium. Jon Kelly — engineering. Stuart Elliot — drums, percussion. Del Palmer — bass. Ian Bairnson — electric and acoustic guitar. Duncan Mackay — synthesizer. David Katz — orchestra contractor. Performed live on the Tour of Life in 1979. Images: from the cover of Andi Harriman and Marloes Bontje’s Some Wear Leather Some Wear Laces; Lon Chaney and Patsy Ruth Miller in The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923, dir. Wallace Worsley); The Gurning Queen; Siouxsie and the Banshees”.

With Coffee Homeground as its B-side, Hammer Horror is one of Bush’s strongest singles I think. On 3rd November, it will be forty-seven years since the song was released. I have a lot of love for it. Although not my favourite Kate Bush single, I do feel that Hammer Horror is underrated. Releasing the final track from Lionheart as the first single was unorthodox. Perhaps not the obvious first single, as I mentioned. However, between the live performances and that amazing video, Hammer Horror made an impression. It is a song that is far too good…

TO be forgotten.

FEATURE: Points of Authority: Linkin Park's Hybrid Theory at Twenty-Five

FEATURE:

 

 

Points of Authority

 

Linkin Park's Hybrid Theory at Twenty-Five

__________

THIS album…

PHOTO CREDIT: Mick Hutson/Getty Images

is one that I remember listening to a lot when I was in college. I was aware of Linkin Park in 2000, yet Hybrid Theory was their debut. I think there was some buzz around the band before the album came out, but it was only when Hybrid Theory came out that I connected with them. That immense debut turns twenty-five on 24th October. I want to spend time with it. I will end with a review of the album. However, before getting there, it is worth bringing in some features. It is s shame that Linkin Park’s former lead, Chester Bennington, does not get to see people react to twenty-five years of Hybrid Theory. He died in 2017. Hybrid Theory’s lyrics address Bennington’s experiences during his adolescence, including drug abuse and the constant fighting and eventual divorce of his parents. Because Linkin Park were another Nu Metal band joining the scene, there was mocking and ridicule. It was a scene that had its detractors. Limp Bizkit were already around. It was not until In the End was released, which came out on 9th October, 2001, that a lot of opinion changed. However, Hybrid Theory is an incredible album from a distinct band. One that were serous and stood apart from those around them. In 2020, Stereogum marked twenty years of Hybrid Theory:

They had a plan.” That was the late Chester Bennington, just before his 2017 death, reflecting on the first time he met his Linkin Park bandmates. That plan is what attracted Bennington to the band. At the time, Bennington was just past 20, but he was already done with the music business. Bennington had spent five years in Grey Daze, an Arizona grunge band. Grey Daze had self-released two albums, and they had a local following, but they never went anywhere outside the Phoenix area. Bennington was looking for stability. He married young, and he got a job at a digital services firm. He wasn’t going to be a rock star. But then Jeff Blue, a music exec who knew Bennington a little bit, told him about a Los Angeles rap-rock band who needed a singer. If you were a young man looking for stability, then you could see why joining Linkin Park was a pretty good bet.

Linkin Park were, and are, professionals. They were always businessmen, never hedonists. In a nu-metal world full of party-hard jokers and outsized personalities, Linkin Park were practically monks. They didn’t engage in rock-star hijinks. They wrote lyrics so broad and relatable that they could fit just about any dark-night-of-the-soul context. Their music only barely scanned as metal, and they took more, both lyrically and aesthetically, from Depeche Mode and Echo And The Bunnymen than from Helmet or Pantera. They attacked their soul-wracking self-exorcisms with a businesslike precision. They didn’t even cuss on records. And they eclipsed all of their peers.

Linkin Park showed up in the waning days of the nu-metal boom. Korn and Limp Bizkit were still huge, but they’d already peaked. Kid Rock was already in the early stages of his Southern-rock transition. Slipknot and Static-X and Coal Chamber and most of the other big rap-metal bands had already released their biggest albums. (P.O.D. were still ascendant, but they had the Christian thing going for them, so they could afford to be late.) A week before the release of Hybrid Theory, Limp Bizkit had dropped their third album Chocolate Starfish And The Hot Dog Flavored Water — a huge hit, but one that couldn’t match the sales of 1999’s Significant Other.

Originally, Linkin Park had planned to call themselves Hybrid Theory, but the existence of the British dance group Hybrid made that a no-go. So they kept Hybrid Theory for the album title and picked a new band name. They’d considered calling themselves Lincoln Park, after the Santa Monica enclave, but they changed the spelling because the LinkinPark.com domain name was still available. As far back as 1999, Mike Shinoda was thinking about search-engine optimization — the mark of a true professional.

Listening to Hybrid Theory now, a few things are striking. There’s the clear debt that Linkin Park owe to Nine Inch Nails, whose big programmed beats and ultra-processed guitars were the clearest possible antecedent. There’s the lack of specificity in the lyrics — the way “I” and “you” and maybe “time” are the only characters on the LP. There’s the force of personality that Bennington brings — the guy clearly knew his way around a big hook and understood how to invest his screams with stadium-sized catharsis. And there’s how sad the whole fucking thing is.

Hybrid Theory is, on some level, a fundamentally teenage album, an album about feeling like the world doesn’t understand you and like you just want everyone to get out of your room right now. That teenage quality is the greatest strength and the greatest weakness of Hybrid Theory. The album is repetitive and one-note. The singles often sound huge and overwhelming, but the album tracks usually just wear me out. I don’t think it’s a great record, but then, I’d just gotten done with being a teenager when it came out. If I’d been maybe four years younger, that shit could’ve just kicked me right in the soul”.

I want to next bring in an interview from Metal Hammer published in 2001. They sat down with Chester Bennington and Mike Shinoda to discuss Linkin Park’s stellar rise. We get to discover the background of the band and how they overcame rejection asnd haters. Hybrid Theory was a mighty statement that changed Metal forever:

The very earliest incarnations of the songs from Hybrid Theory were written at my parents’ house when I had just finished high school,” recalls rapper, keyboardist and creative mastermind Mike Shinoda. “A Place For My Head was one of those first songs, but I wasn’t thinking of writing an album – I was barely considering starting a band!”

The young Shinoda’s ‘studio’ was, at best, rudimentary. “I had a four-track recorder, a guitar that we plugged directly into a tiny little amp, and a vocal mic,” he laughs. “The whole set-up was maybe worth $300. We actually sent out a bunch of tapes of those recordings, including to a guy who we knew had signed Incubus and Korn. Amazingly, he called us back! When I told him about my set-up, he was like, ‘That doesn’t make any sense – these songs sound really good!’ And even though he was never in the position to sign us, that was really the start of it.”

With his ambitious creativity and Spartan work practises already earning praise, Shinoda began to form the nucleus of what would become Linkin Park. A merry-go-round of endless demoing ensued, but something was missing from the fledgling line-up. The answer, it turned out, would be found in the form of a flame-haired vocalist from Arizona.

“I had basically decided to retire from music,” says Chester Bennington, reflecting on his frustrating early years trying to make it in a band. “I’d got a job in real estate and thought that while I would probably still make tunes for fun, I would need to find something else to do full-time.”

That’s a fairly remarkable statement for someone who had only just turned 21 at the time, but Bennington, it turned out, was not a man to do things by halves.

“A dude who had been working with my old band gave me a call, going, ‘I’ve got these guys and they’re writing this great music but they really need a singer.’ I immediately was asking all sorts of questions, like, ‘How old are they? How long have they been doing this?’ because I didn’t want to waste my fucking time. He said, ‘Well, I’ll just send you this demo,’ which turned out to have two tracks on one side and instrumentals on the other. I listened to the instrumental side first and immediately I was like, ‘This is it, these are the ones.’ The next thing I know, I’d flown to California and was sat outside Zomba Music Publishing, opposite Whisky A Go Go on Sunset Strip.”

Such quick movement, though, meant that at this stage, Chester hadn’t even set eyes upon the men who would become his new bandmates. “When I finally met the guys, I remember that they seemed very nice, very smart, very serious and, most importantly, they had a plan, which was pretty refreshing.”

If meeting your singer through A&R teams and label suits seems a little – or maybe even a lot – businesslike to you, then you’re not alone in your thinking. When Hybrid Theory did eventually blow up in spectacular fashion, the band had to fend off the accusations of being corporate puppets from all quarters.

“We did get a reputation for being a business rather than a band,” admits Shinoda. “But that was because we were so focused on getting our stuff done. It wasn’t in the name of business – it was in the name of building up this thing we had worked so hard to create. We were prepared to do everything in our power to be successful on all levels.”

The proof of Shinoda, Bennington and co.’s unwavering, singular dedication? Consider the unshakeable faith they had to display as they tried to score the record deal that would turn Hybrid Theory into a reality. “We showcased for every fucking label there was,” sighs Shinoda, “and they all turned us down.”

Shinoda has his own view on the way his band were perceived. “I think that the difference between us and someone like Korn or Limp Bizkit is that, to me, a lot of that music was made for a frat party, a drunken brawl, slutty dudes taking their tops off and feeding off their own testosterone. What we didn’t connect with in that scene was that there wasn’t a lot of room for more introspective emotion. People would ask us, ‘Well, Jonathan Davis practically grew up in a morgue and was molested and all these horrible things. What gives you the right to be angry?’ But you don’t have to have gone through the worst things in the world to be sad. I think that’s something that ultimately really connected with our fans: that you don’t have to be an outcast and a fuck-up to take something from this music on an emotional level. If that makes us dull, then fine.”

It must be said, though, that while their debut album was breaking records for sales and at the same time converting a generation of kids to rock music, Linkin Park weren’t exactly indulging in the rock-star fantasies you might imagine. Even as they were handed the keys to the castle as the biggest band in the world, it was still a case of ‘work hard’ rather than ‘party hard’.

“I guess by most standards we were pretty reserved. We were doing so much that it didn’t leave too much time to get crazy,” jokes Shinoda. “I mean, there was this one time in Minnesota that by the end of the night we had thrown a beer keg through a hotel window and had a snowball fight in the lobby, so we weren’t totally fucking boring, but we were so focused on achieving the next goal.”

Do they wish they had been a bit crazier at the time of their peak? “We did it our way and I wouldn’t change a single thing,” reasons Bennington. “Not a thing.”

All the graft, indisputably, paid off. Hybrid Theory remains the biggest-selling debut album of the 21st century and Linkin Park’s influence can palpably be felt across a whole new wave of emerging acts. A little over 10 years down the line, how do the band reflect on the record that changed their lives irrevocably?

“I’m still enormously proud of that album,” beams Bennington. “Every now and then I will listen back to everything that we’ve done and I still enjoy that record”.

It was a myopic injustice that Hybrid Theory was compared to other Nu Metal albums. Ones that were meat-headed and macho. Instead, this is an album of sensitivity and depth. I am going to come to a feature from NME. They looked at Hybrid Theory on its twentieth anniversary. The anniversary reissue of the album was out. Packed with demos and unheard material, it was a real treat fans. You can purchase it here. Chester Bennington, Rob Bourdon, Brad Delson, Joe Hahn, Mike Shinoda and Dave ‘Phoenix’ Farrell (he was credited but did not play) created one of the albums of the decade with 2000’s Hybrid Theory. NME spoke with famous fans of Hybrid Theory. The album inspired the likes of Billie Eilish, Brockhampton, Twenty One Pilots, Bring Me the Horizon and YUNGBLUD:

The likes of the elegiac ‘In The End’, the serrated ‘Crawlin’ and the ferocious ‘One Step Closer’ dominated music television and gave confused, emotional teenagers a voice. Meanwhile, the record earned the band a Grammy (‘Crawlin’’ took Best Hard Rock Performance) and became the best-selling album of the year. To this day, it remains one of the biggest-selling rock albums of all time, having shifted more than 27 million copies, making it, commercially, the biggest rock record of the 21st Century.

“They only seem like big songs in retrospect,” Shinoda says. “In the studio, there was a lot of anxiety to get it right.” Those worries didn’t stop when they finally released the album they’d been dreaming about for years. “The expectations of us as a band were growing so quickly. We were just kids being expected to headline big festivals with 40 minutes of music. The pressure was immense.”

They played over 300 shows to promote the album (says Hahn: “It felt like we had to prove ourselves every time we went onstage”) and pushed against the nu-metal label that was ascribed to them by the media. With the release of their hip-hop heavy remix album ‘Reanimation’ in 2002, the band continued to do things their own way. Everything from the record’s Banksy-inspired street art artwork to what the band stood for felt like a protest.

“All the music we liked was rebellious,” Hahn says. “Hip-hop felt like a neo punk rock in some way and as far as subject matter, we were definitely all about fighting against the system and lifting up a big middle finger.“

ybrid Theory’ was released in the midst of nu-metal’s assault on the mainstream. Korn were riding high after two back-to-back Number One albums (1998’s ‘Issues’ and 1999’s ‘Follow The Leader’) and it was impossible to avoid Limp Bizkit’s 2000 album ‘Chocolate Starfish And The Hot Dog Flavoured Water’. Musically, ‘Hybrid Theory’ fit into a scene that combined heavy metal with hip-hop, but there was much more to them then wallet-chains and red caps.

“We can laugh at it now but we were put on a pedestal as the trophy boys of nu-metal,” says Linkin Park’s Joe Hahn. “We didn’t love it all and because our album combined so many styles, it felt like a much bigger approach. We didn’t call it ‘Nu-Metal Theory’; it was ‘Hybrid Theory’ because we wanted to make something different.“

Nu-metal was a macho scene, but, says Jordan Fish, “Linkin Park weren’t really a macho band, were they? It was rebellious, but they still had universal songs like ‘In The End’ that your mum could enjoy on the radio. A lot of songs from that era were straight-up ‘Fuck everyone!’ bro anger, but Linkin Park were a lot more emo and introspective. They didn’t have that silly aggression that a lot of nu metal bands had; they were talking about depression.”

Linkin Park’s ‘Hybrid Theory’ accelerated genre-less listening habits, exposed a generation of kids to what else was out there and turned six music nerds into the biggest thing in rock. Their message of believing in yourself – even when no one else will –  continues to resonate with a global audience, as does their insistence that it’s healthy to embrace your flaws.

As the band’s Joe Hahn puts it: “Seeing the impact that album had on people as individuals, and how that echoed through different places in the world, holds a very special place to us. It let us know that what we do has an impact on people, and that’s not something to take lightly”.

I am going to finish with a review of the 20th Anniversary Edition of Hybrid Theory. KERRANG! awarded the release five stars. Even if there are some fillers when you look at all the extra tracks, they note how Hybrid Theory still sounds so urgent and important. An album that has inspired so many other artists. Twenty-five years on from its release and you can hear it in the blood of some of modern music’s best artists:

It’s not hyperbolic to say that Hybrid Theory is one of the most important rock albums of all time. It was that perfect gateway drug for millions of teens around the globe to discover alternative music through its monumental hooks, bouncing beats and the unstoppable, never-bettered vocal interplay between Chester Bennington and Mike Shinoda. Merging the worlds of hip-hop and electronica (previously seen as enemies) with rock and metal, this ‘hybrid’ felt fresh, energising and the perfect sound to usher in a new millennium. Building on the foundations of their peers in Deftones and KornLinkin Park’s debut had the accessibility turned up to 11, with shimmering production and lyrics so infectious you’d need gloves to handle them.

And, to mark two whole decades since its release, Linkin Park have opened their vault to bring us a chonking great six-record box set that follows the embryonic stages of the band – originally known as Xero – to the brain-mangling 2002 remix album Reanimation.

Listening to Hybrid Theory today is just as exhilarating as it was in 2000. From the opening pulses of Papercut, few records strike at the heart of what it means to be cutting edge, the sound of a band determined to shake things up, pulling from influences as diverse as Depeche Mode and DJ Shadow. And while it’s always great to hear the pained wails of Crawling, the simply timeless In The End, and nu-metal aggro of One Step Closer, there’s still so much below the surface. The criminally underrated With You (with Chester’s cathartic, guttural ‘With youuuuuuuuuuuuu’), the joyous ‘Hoo-hah!’ in Forgotten, the electro-wizardry of Cure For The Itch… this is more than an album of four mega-singles.

Away from the record proper, we find ourselves in the midst of its kind-of sister album, Reanimation. Released two years after Hybrid Theory, the band invited some of their DJ and rapper mates to reinvent the record, with varying degrees of success. “They were all people that we really looked up to and wanted to collaborate with,” Joe Hahn told Kerrang! in this week’s Cover Story. Sadly, it isn’t a 100 per cent hit rate: some remixes miss the magic of Linkin Park completely, hacking their way through a capella vocals and riffs until they’re a useless mess. That said, the dubby bass of Frgt/10 with Charli 2na and Pharoahe Monch’s showing on H! Vltg3 elevate the record, while Deftones’ Steph Carpenter’s interpretation of By Myself (titled By_Myslf, naturally) adds even more heaviness and a refreshing, almost-Infected Mushroom beat. None of the songs, however, are an improvement on the originals.

At six records and a whopping 80 tracks, it’s vast undertaking for one listening session. And unlike the lavish box design suggests, this isn’t all gold, but that’s not the point. It’s as much about the journey as the destination, and this is a 20 year celebration and exploration of how Linkin Park worked their way from lo-fi 1998 demos to flame-haired world-conquerers just two years later. In fact, it would have been great to include a visual element – perhaps the band’s 2014 Download set where the played the album in full? Arguably the greatest 38 minutes the festival has ever seen. And 12 songs that we’ll never get tired of listening to, ever”.

Linkin Park are still recording and playing to this day. Now led by Emily Armstrong, they released their eighth studio album, From Zero, last year. Although nobody can replace Chester Bennington, that is not what Linkin Park are trying to do. Armstrong is carrying on his legacy but also offering something new to the band. I don’t think they ever released an album as incredible as their debut. On 24th October, we celebrate twenty-five years of Hybrid Theory. I recall the album fondly. In the End is the standout cut from the album from a band who were simply brilliant…

FROM the beginning.

FEATURE: Digital Witnesses: The Importance of Three New BBC Radio DAB+ Additions

FEATURE:

 

 

Digital Witnesses

 PHOTO CREDIT: Good Housekeeping

 

The Importance of Three New BBC Radio DAB+ Additions

__________

I am going to start out with a feature…

IMAGE CREDIT: BBC

describing and expanding on a piece of news that I missed initially! It is hugely important. In terms of the way we listen to radio, I think habits are changing. Whilst many still listen through traditional and analogue radios, many are preferring the options and ease of a DAB radio. Although there is some contention and disagreement with the BBC expanding its radio empire and offering three new digital stations, I think that it is a good thing. Let us first come to Music Week and what they write about a development that will draw in new listeners and adds new station to a digital roster last updated back in 2002:

The BBC is expanding its broadcast radio network with three new music stations – a move described as a “significant milestone” in the history of BBC Radio.

The three new station extensions from BBC Radio 1 and Radio 3 are the first to be added to the BBC’s music portfolio since 2002, when the BBC launched 6 Music, 1Xtra and Asian Network. 

After launching on BBC Sounds as streams last year, they will now be available to listen to on DAB+ radio following Ofcom approval. The new brand extensions will continue to live on BBC Sounds, as well as on DAB+. 

However, the new stations will not go down well with advertiser-funded commercial radio, which has consistently pushed back against BBC expansion. The commercial sector won a partial victory with the blocking of a proposed Radio 2 nostalgia station by Ofcom, which identified a negative impact on direct competitors such as Boom Radio.

While welcoming the decision on the Radio 2 spin-off last year, commercial radio trade body Radiocentre cast doubt on the distinctiveness of the three new stations and questioned their public service role as part of the licence fee-funded broadcaster.

“The fact that the other spin-offs will now go ahead is disappointing, especially given their lack of distinctiveness or news output,” said CEO Matt Payton. “We expect Ofcom to monitor these new BBC services closely and hope it will reconsider the case for insisting on enhanced public value on these stations in future.”

BBC brand extensions into online digital streams, such as its 24-hour BBC Radio 1 dance service, prompted calls for an Ofcom review of BBC Sounds in 2020.

BBC Radio 1 Dance launches on September 15 with a mix of new and archive sets from various DJs among its programming.

Radio 1 Anthems features songs from the 2000s and 2010s, including ‘workout anthems’ and Radio 1’s ‘chillout anthems’.

Aled Haydn-Jones, head of Radio 1, said: “I’m delighted to bring Radio 1 listeners not one, but two incredible new genre-led networks on DAB+. R1 Dance and R1 Anthems provide a strong and confident offer for younger listeners – delivering more choice and music to match every mood. 

“Both stations bring together the very best expert DJs, rising presenting talent, exciting events and the best of British music for our audiences to discover. More than two decades since the launch of 1Xtra, this marks another exciting chapter in Radio 1’s history as the number one radio station for younger listeners.”

IN THIS PHOTO: Aled Haydn-Jones/PHOTO CREDIT: BBC

The new Radio 1 stations present a potential challenge to existing commercial operators including Kiss and Capital Dance, which has been a ratings success since its launch five years ago.

Meanwhile, Radio 3 Unwind aims – launching today (September 12) – aims to broaden the audience for classical music in the UK with a schedule designed for younger listeners (35-54) than other classical stations and is designed for a modern audience.

BBC Radio 3 Unwind features wellbeing content, combining classical music with mindfulness.

Sam Jackson, Radio 3 controller, said: “Radio 3 Unwind has already been positively received as a stream on BBC Sounds and I’m really pleased to now bring it to a wider audience on DAB+. The station offers a wide-ranging selection of calming classical music—perfect for listeners seeking an escape from the demands of daily life. It’s a fresh way to enjoy classical music, designed to be both welcoming and enriching.”

I’m really pleased to now bring Radio 3 Unwind to a wider audience on DAB+

Sam Jackson

When Music Week interviewed Radio 3 controller Sam Jackson last year, he stressed the distinctive nature of the BBC Sounds digital stream of Unwind – now upgraded to a DAB+ station.

“It has to be [distinctive], if it's from the BBC, it absolutely has to be,” he said last year. “That's our job to offer distinctive content that you can't get elsewhere, and we're working really hard to make sure that Radio 3 Unwind gives you exactly that. We really want to focus on recordings from the last 10 years or so to champion the recorded music industry. I think there's more that we could be doing to support labels and artists who are recording really exciting stuff within classical music. Because we're the BBC, we have an opportunity to really broaden the range of music that is heard. It would be all too easy simply to play the ‘hits’ on a station like this, to play the very well known classical repertoire. We're not here to do that.”

BBC ‘commitment to new music and British artists’

The BBC has said the new stations reinforce its “commitment to championing new music and supporting British artists”.

Radio 1 Dance showcases the BBC’s investment in dance music, reflecting all sub-genres, from chart hits to house and drum & bass. The schedule reflects the full range of electronic music and dance trends across the UK and globally.

British artists make up a third of Radio 1 Anthems’ airplay, with a quarter of the tracks unlikely to get regular play on key commercial stations. 

The new extension plays a broader range of music than any comparable station, according to the BBC, with a music policy developed by collaborating with the Student Radio Association and designed to resonate with younger listeners.

Radio 3 Unwind broadcasts exclusive recordings from the BBC’s own orchestras and choirs. Living composers feature throughout the schedule, with a particular focus on both established and emerging homegrown British talent.

The station also reflects under-represented composers, including women and ethnically diverse composers. The dedicated new music programme Soundwaves, presented by Afrodeutsche, provides a platform for contemporary voices including BBC Introducing artists.

Digital listening habits

The BBC’s decision to launch three stations on DAB+ underscores the evolution of the audio landscape over the past decades, with 75% of the population now listening to the radio digitally (DAB/DAB+ and online).

It also marks the first DAB+ music stations launched by the BBC. Existing networks use the older DAB technology, though recent digital radios should be able to access both.

The BBC cited research showing that music streaming dominates among under-35s, who spend just 27% of their audio time with live radio compared to 49% with streaming services. 

Despite this shift, radio still reaches 13.6 million under-35s each week and remains a key source of music discovery across all age groups.

The rise of new stations on DAB/DAB+ reflects where the majority of live radio listening is projected to take place by 2030.

DAB/DAB+ covers 97% of the UK population and 87% of major roads.  It is also available in 100% of all new cars. 68% of households claim to have a DAB/DAB+ radio”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Afrodeutsche presents Soundwaves on BBC Radio 3 Unwind/PHOTO CREDIT: Kasia Zacharko

These new stations are important for so many reasons. For one, this is a reaction to changing trends. How people are listening to radio now. I don’t think that it is an attack on commercial radio. The BBC is allowed to expand and offer choices. To reach new audiences. Commercial radio will still exist but, at a time when we want to focus more on the content and people have less patience for commercials and any interruptions, we need to accept the fact that this is not going to disappear. I avoid commercial radio for that very reason. I know these stations need this advertising revenue but, when you are bombarded by cheesy and grating commercials between every few songs, it can be hugely off-putting. I do not want to listen to them so, every so often, you have to turn the volume down and wait for them to finish! Instead, with the BBC, you get more time dedicated to actual music and content. This is what people tune in for. However, I can appreciate that stations like Boom Radio are hugely important. Appealing to older listeners, their voice and opinions are hugely valid. They need a station that speaks to them. It is difficult. I don’t think the BBC should have its own equivalent, as that would take market share and focus from Boom Radio. However, these three new digital stations are going to easily and naturally fit into the BBC radio portfolio. Sitting alongside BBC Radio 3, BBC Radio 1 and BBC Radio 1 Xtra, I think it will attract more people to digital radio. There is also a progressiveness as well. BBC Radio 3 Unwind is a station I am especially looking forward to. I have been trying to listen to BBC Radio 3 more as I love Classical music and a lot of contemporary composers.

IMAGE CREDIT: Boom Radio

I am a huge BBC Radio 6 Music fan so find myself listening more to that. However, as BBC Radio 3 Unwind also shines a light on under-represented composers  - and an overdue acknowledgement of women in that arena -, then I think I will spend some time with it. The Anthems stations is going to be great. A blast of nostalgia but also some chillout anthems, it is going to provide respite and uplift for listeners! The stations also provide a platform for new music and artists. Perhaps they would struggle to feature on other BBC stations, so this is a positive move towards including more new artists. I love BBC Radio 3 Unwind and Cinematic Soundtracks. That sounds right up my street! There are so many fascinating shows and presenters. A chance to chill and unwind. Some incredible anthems. This great chance for digital radio to welcome these exciting BBC stations. I guess the flip side is that it maybe damage some commercial stations or take attention from them. And local radio. Local radio is declining and that is a sad thing to see. We need to recognise their importance and place. Stations that maybe struggle to grow and exist and need as big an audience as possible. I do sympathise. However, it is good that the BBC I reacting to future predictions. That digital radio is going to grow and listening habits are changing. There is a lot to look forward to. BBC Radio 1 Dance will tempt more teenagers to digital radio. Giving them choice that they might not otherwise have had. There was a lot of interest when BBC Radio 6 Music launched in 2002. Rather than them having rivals and worrying, they have stablemates. It is going to be a big week next week when we get these new stations all open for business together. Radio 3 Unwind launched on Thursday. Going forward, we will see those who otherwise would spend time streaming music go to digital radio. I think this is positive. In terms of the benefits. It is a new venture but one which will provide much more good than bad. A lot of listeners who might have felt unheard or struggle to find their place now have a home. Radio programmes that are beneficial for mental and physical health. Educational, progressive and escapist, it is what we all need! For that reason alone, this trio of BBC Radio DAB+ stations should be welcomed…

WITH open arms.

FEATURE: Kate Bush: The Tour of Life: What Would Be the Ultimate Project to Honour the Icon?

FEATURE:

 

 

Kate Bush: The Tour of Life

 

What Would Be the Ultimate Project to Honour the Icon?

__________

THIS is very much a personal thing…

as everyone would have their own opinions about what the best Kate Bush-related project would be. This year, there have been magazine articles and features. There recently has been a Hounds of Love book from Leah Kardos. Looking ahead to next year, I wonder what might come. As we have marked forty years of Hounds of Love and Aerial turns twenty in November, I wonder if that will lead to any special projects or books. I have said how there should be a book dedicated to Aerial. Her eighth studio album released in 2005, there is a 33 1/3 book in it. There has been a bit written about Aerial, though nothing in the form of a book. It seems a shame that this has not happened yet. I have written features about what projects could come and what gaps there are to fill. I have said how it would be great to have photobooks with unseen photos or maybe an exhibition where we get to see Kate Bush photos, memorabilia and artefacts. David Bowie has this V&A archive. In fact, it is a permanent David Bowie Centre. Even though Kate Bush would not get something as prestigious, I think that she is deserving of something very special. Maybe she would feel this is too exposing. However, I am not sure whether she has been approached about anything like this. There is so much that could happen. However, you wonder what Kate Bush would allow and whether she would want herself exposed in such a way. It is a hard balance. For that reason, I don’t think there will be any documentaries about her. There have been in the past. However, I think we might get audio documentaries but nothing filmed.

I have always thought what I can do. I have written a lot of Kate Bush features, though it is all digital and could disappear at some point. I get people reading my stuff, though I wonder whether it is quite disposable. I am not sure whether I will do a podcast anytime soon. I would love to be a guest on a Kate Bush podcast but, for me, I am not going to do a long-running one. For a regular podcast, I would need to do something in a studio or space that was quiet. I do not have access to that. Even though I have never written a book, I wonder whether it is something that I could do. I do not consider myself to be a great writer. However, with enough research and guidance. I might be able to write something good. In terms of Kate Bush books, there have been ones about some of her albums. There have been some great biographies, including Graeme Thomson’s definitive, Under the Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush. Maybe there is not a lot to offer in terms of a new biography. However, I could always combine some of my features into a book. I have suggested that there could be a Kate Bush Encyclopedia book. There is a website of that name. Maybe a book that combined all her albums, some interviews and graphs. Pictorial representation of facts and figures. I would love to have this opportunity to pay tribute to Kate Bush. Something that is permanent and would be something you could hold. A couple of ideas I have narrowed down to is an equivalent of the book, Quantum Criminals: Ramblers, Wild Gamblers, and Other Sole Survivors from the Songs of Steely Dan, written by Alex Pappademas with artwork by Joan LeMay. This book looks at the characters in Steely Dan’s music. Rather than it being a traditional biography, this looks at the people in the songs. Building worlds and images around that. It is a brilliant book.

There are plenty of characters in Kate Bush’s music where something similar could be created. It is very tempting. There would need to be an original angle. Not repeating what has gone before. Whether it is a book about Kate Bush as a producer or something else, I have been considering something larger. I would love to be specific and write a book about The Kick Inside. A new book, Kate Bush: On Location takes us inside some of the crucial and interesting spots of notes. Where music videos were filmed, various studio and locations important to Kate Bush’s career and story. It is wonderful. I do love that idea of creating a beautiful hardback book with some great illustrations and wonderful insights. That character book like Quantum Criminals: Ramblers, Wild Gamblers, and Other Sole Survivors from the Songs of Steely Dan. Rather than it being a straight Kate Bush biography, a chance to talk about her career and work but focusing on the characters. I think there are at least forty characters, named or otherwise, that could be included. The Kick Inside and Lionheart might not have that many but, from Never for Ever onwards, we do get quite a few. If there was not enough ammunition to match Quantum Criminals: Ramblers, Wild Gamblers, and Other Sole Survivors from the Songs of Steely Dan, I still want to show my love for Kate Bush and how important she is. I want to do something by 2028. That is when Kate Bush turns seventy. It is also when her debut, The Kick Inside, turns fifty. It is going to be a big year. I think something published is the best way to properly salute her, though I would love to be involved in an audio production or podcast. A book about her career through her characters would be new and fertile with possibility. Maybe expand and bring in influences for Kate Bush including literary and film. Artists thar she admired and mentioned. I am very determined to do something wonderful for…

THIS music queen.

FEATURE: The First Sign of Snow: Kate Bush’s Wild Man and the Taste of a Very Special Album

FEATURE:

 

 

The First Sign of Snow

 

Kate Bush’s Wild Man and the Taste of a Very Special Album

__________

I have written about…

Wild Man before, so I shall try not to repeat myself too much regarding that. This was the first taste of new material. After Kate Bush released Director’s Cut in May, there was no real feeling that she would follow it up so quickly. In terms of sound, 50 Words for Snow is very different to any other album from Kate Bush. Although it does not do great when album rankings come out, it is this incredible work. So atmospheric and grand. Maybe a little sparse compared to other Kate Bush albums in terms of instruments, there is so much beauty and space. In terms of the standouts, Wild Man is right up there. It was perhaps an obvious single as it is the second-shortest track on the album. The shortest, Among Angels, would have also been a great single. Even so, Wild Man is over seven minutes, so it did need a radio edit. Typical of Kate Bush, there were not a lot of obvious singles of 50 Words for Snow. I think this was deliberate. When she released Aerial in 2005, there was this feeling she was releasing a complete body of work and was not considering singles and what could be played on the radio. Even so, there were a few songs that had that single potential. Nothing really like this with Wild Man. Regardless, this was the official single that was released. I am going to mark fourteen years of 50 Words for Snow closer its anniversary on 21st November. On 11th October, it will be fourteen years since Wild Man was released. It was an exciting day. I remember. Kate Bush did say in interviews for Director’s Cut how there was an album coming. However, we did not get an idea or suggestion what it could be. I think 50 Words for Snow took us by surprise. In terms of just how evocative it is. If people associate her work with something lighter and more energetic, perhaps an album that was closer to Chamber Jazz or was a lot slower and more expansive took them aback. I will bring in a critical review soon.

Unlike Aerial or Hounds of Love, 50 Words for Snow is an album that also got rave reviews but does not score high on ranking lists like those other albums. Perhaps seen as inessential. However, Kate Bush’s latest album is tremendous. Wild Man is a song that could only come from her. I am going to reference some information I have include in features before. Let’s start out with stuff you have probably already read. Though it is good to get the reminder and context. Some words from Kate Bush about Wild Man:

Kate about ‘Wild Man’

Well, the first verse of the song is just quickly going through some of the terms that the Yeti is known by and one of those names is the Kangchenjunga Demon. He’s also known as Wild Man and Abominable Snowman. (…) I don’t refer to the Yeti as a man in the song. But it is meant to be an empathetic view of a creature of great mystery really. And I suppose it’s the idea really that mankind wants to grab hold of something [like the Yeti] and stick it in a cage or a box and make money out of it. And to go back to your question, I think we’re very arrogant in our separation from the animal kingdom and generally as a species we are enormously arrogant and aggressive. Look at the way we treat the planet and animals and it’s pretty terrible isn’t it?

John Doran, ‘A Demon In The Drift: Kate Bush Interviewed’. The Quietus, 2011

I guess in some ways, you could say that it’s the most immediate song on the album… It’s really a song entity for the Yeti – this mysterious creature that no one is sure whether or not it exists. It’s about how precious that mystery is, you know? We have such little mystery in our lives, generally, because of how we live now. I mean, of course, mystery is all around us, but the way we live our lives now, we’re too busy to be bothered with it.

Joe Tiller, ”50 Words For Snow’: How Kate Bush Made A Wintry Wonder Of An Album. Dig! Website, 11 DECEMBER 2022

Stephen W. Taylor about ‘Wild Man (with remastered shimmer)’

It was something I worked on with Rupert [Hine]. I added layers of sound to it, but they’re almost inaudible, which was done with Kate’s approval. In fact, fans were pissed off because they felt it wasn’t any different to the original version. In fact, it’s completely different. It has a very different sonic approach. We asked Kate to name it and she said it should be “With Remastered Shimmer” so that’s what it was called. (Anil Prasad, Stephen W Tayler – Experiential evocation. Innerviews, 2020)”.

That last interview relates to a version of Wild Man that appeared on the album The Art of Peace: Songs for Tibet II in 2015. I would love to hear different version of Wild Man. It is this song that could benefit from remixes and new versions. I don’t know if anyone has covered the song before. The musicianship on Wild Man are extraordinary. Steve Gadd is on percussion. He adds something magical to the song. His beats and drive gives Wild Man this mystery, energy and wonder. The late John Giblin provides bass. The late Del Palmer on bells. These two much missed musicians absolutely phenomenal. Dan McIntosh (Kate Bush’s partner) on guitars, with Andy Fairweather Low providing vocals with Kate Bush, who is on keyboards. The first taste of a new album, how did the press react to Wild Man in 2011? With no huge idea of what the other six tracks on 50 Words for Snow would sound like, it was a gamble. Wild Man sits beautiful in the centre of the album. After the epic Misty and Kate Bush’s duet with Elton John, Snowed in at Wheeler Street, Wild Man perfectly bridges the two halves. I would have thought that Bush would also release Among Angels as a single. I kind of thought an edited version of Misty would have come out at Christmas. It is about a snowman, so I would have thought the single would be a popular, if unconventional, single. NME provided one of the most positive reviews for Wild Man:

For those of us who have been secretly longing for a return to the unflinchingly bizarre and Bush’s ability to conjure up strange new worlds, ‘Wild Man’ is a deep joy.

Lyrically we’re in a literal wilderness, where the ‘Wild Man’ of the title is a revealed to be a Yeti-type figure roaming the wiles of the Himalayas. Bush’s whispered vocal delivery of the lyrics (which are full of geographical intrigue and century old myth) is full of the right balance of fear, intrigue and empathy towards the plight of the shadowy figure (“I can hear your cry/Echoing around the mountain side/You sound lonely,” she sings).

As for the the chorus, it bursts forth mid-eruption; a choir of strange voices; echoing the ‘Wild Man”s own explosion out of habitation into civilization in the narrative of the song. Bush tackles this by a multiple layering of voices, creating several personas and the atmosphere of a village set adrift by the sudden intrusion. It’s a style which recalls some of her most classic work.

Musically, we’ve moved on subtly from the pared down production of ‘Director’s Cut’, and on ‘Wild Man’ a guitar riff-plays pan-Asian and ponderous, but there’s also a layering of sounds in the chorus (tinkling percussion, a bedrock of organs), which suggests her 80s heyday.

Multiple listens on, the references just keep coming; there’s ‘Scary Monsters And Super Creeps’ era Bowie and some of the ‘Tusk’ era Fleetwood Mac and her own ‘Sensual World’ and ‘The Dreaming’.

After the domestic bliss of ‘Aerial’, it’s a deep joy to have Kate roam the narrative wiles of her imagination. The result is her strongest single for decades”.

Billboard were definitely intrigued by Wild Man. In their review, this is what they had to say about a song that I think ranks alongside Kate Bush’s very best. They felt, as the first truly original single since King of the Mountain 2005 (Director’s Cut’s Deeper Understanding is a re-recorded version of the song that appears on 1989’s The Sensual World), it was a slight surprise:

The weird and whimsical “Wild Man” serves as the first new single from British art-rock craftswoman Kate Bush in a whopping six years (not including the re-tooled tracks from this year’s “Director’s Cut”). A word of advice to first-time listeners: be sure to have an atlas and thesaurus handy. “From the Sherpas of Annapurna to the Rinpoche of Qinghai / Shepherds from Mount Kailash to Himachal Pradesh,” sings Bush in her breathy lisp, somehow sounding erotic while randomly referencing Indian provinces and Buddhist principles. For all of its impenetrable wordplay,”Wild Man” makes for a wicked headphone atmosphere, with Dan McIntosh’s expressionistic digital guitar curlicues wandering around a crisp Steve Gadd kit and John Giblin bass. As an announcement of Bush’s return, “Wild Man” is a tad off-kilter. But then again, when has the ever-singular Bush been anything but?”.

There were not that many reviews for Wild Man. That is understandable. Not a conventional or young Pop artist, there is less attention towards those who are older and are not considered to be ‘current’ or near the mainstream. Even so, The Needle Drop - https://theneedledrop.com/2011-11-kate-bush-wild-man-radio-edit/ - were impressed with a track that could only have been generated by the genius of Kate Bush:

Wild Man” is the first track to drop from the album, and I’m loving the wintery feel of this song. Yeah, maybe I get that because of the vibe implied by the title of this album, but I really feel like playing this song is making the room I’m in colder. I think I can see my own breath.

But honestly, the icy grooves on this track are pretty pleasant. Kate’s voice guides the track through some quiet verses, and the chorus explodes with the beauty of a 60s psych pop tune. Can’t wait to review the LP tonight”.

This was the first taste of snow. The initial glimpse into Kate Bush’s tenth studio album. 50 Words for Snow is this underrated masterpiece. Wild Man a typically brilliant track that reveals new layers with each listen. I will include some interviews with Kate Bush when I do an anniversary feature for 50 Words for Snow nearer 21st November. However, as Kate Bush News wrote in  a feature from 2011, Kate Bush was pleased with how 50 Words for Snow came out and the guests who appear on it. I do wonder if an eleventh studio album will have guests on it:

Kate says she doesn’t want anyone to mistake this for a “Christmas” album: “That is one concern I had when people heard the title and when they got to see the artwork on the cover . . . that they would think it was a Christmas album…people don’t seem to be saying that, which is great because it isn’t. If they did think that they’d be disappointed.”

Kate is thrilled by her guests on the album. On Stephen Fry, who features on the album’s title track, she tells The Australian: “What I was trying to do was find someone who had a great voice of authority. The idea of the song was that we would start off with straightforward words and then come up with completely ridiculous ones. That really tickles me because it’s meant to be fun.”

Kate also talks about Elton John’s performance on ‘Snowed in at Wheeler Street’: “I love his performance. He has a fantastic voice. If he had said no I don’t know who I would have asked, but luckily he said yes. I was really lucky that everyone I asked to be on the album agreed to do it”.

On 11th October, it will be fourteen years since Wild Man was released. On 10th October, The 7:16-minute version was first played on The Ken Bruce Show and the 4:16-minute ‘radio edit’ was made available for streaming on Kate Bush's official YouTube channel after the radio premiere. It is interesting, as 50 Words for Snow was released on Fish People. That is Kate Bush’s label. Newly-crated so that she could take more control of the music, Wild Man was released through Noble & Brite. That is Kate Bush’s business. It used to be called Novercia Ltd. Even though it is not a major anniversary, I wanted to shine a light on Wild Man. I have not even delved into the lyrics of the song. My favourite lines end the song: “While crossing the Lhakpa-La/Something jumped down from the rocks/In the remote Garo Hills by Dipu Marak/We found footprints in the snow”. I really love Wild Man. I think that 50 Words for Snow should get more respect and love. It is an album from Kate Bush that ranks alongside…

HER greatest moments.

FEATURE: A Smarter Choice: Is the Comeback of the MP3 Player a Sign of Things to Come?

FEATURE:

 

 

A Smarter Choice

 PHOTO CREDIT: Jean Marc Bonnel/Pexels

 

Is the Comeback of the MP3 Player a Sign of Things to Come?

__________

THE slight turn away…

PHOTO CREDIT: Astell & Kern

from digital music is happening. Not that streaming will ever be replaced by physical music. It is convenient and affordable for many of us. I don’t think that it is a bad thing to listen to music digitally. I do it a lot. However, there is this demand for physical music and formats. When it comes to the way we listen to music, though we want to buy vinyl, it is not always the most convenient of methods. You have to be stationery and it is about sitting down and listening to an album. People do want to experience music on the go. I was born in the 1980s, and most of my best days listening to music were about C.D.s and cassettes. I would listen on a Sony Walkman or Discman. Those technologies still have a place today, though they were discontinued. They were replaced by other technologies such as the iPod and MP3 players. The MiniDisc (MD) was discontinued in 2013. When digital music and streaming came in, these physical devices were sort of phased out. Assumed to be irrelevant. Smartphones were seen as the natural successor. Although they are convincement and provide portability, the truth is that smartphones do not have the same quality as other devices. For people who want to listen to music on the go but want an actual music device, it seems that MP3s are experiencing a revival. Earlier this year, What Hi-Fi? provided a guide to the best portable music players. It is true that Smartphones do not provide good quality when it comes to music playing:

We're sorry to break it to you, but for all of its communication cleverness and photography prowess, your phone is a pretty poor music-playing device.

For all their multi-tasking, modern-day mastery, smartphones simply do not sound good – not out of their built-in speakers, headphone output or over Bluetooth. And that's where dedicated portable music players (or 'DAPs': digital audio players) come in.

In contrast, they are designed first and foremost to store music and play it back in the best quality possible. Not only do even the best budget models sound miles better than the most premium phones – to the point that they can justifiably feed high-end headphones or even a hi-fi system – but they can also hold thousands of albums of the highest recording quality.

In a bid to remain relevant in this feature-competitive world, most now offer wi-fi and built-in access to music streaming service apps like Tidal and Spotify”.

For The Guardian, Alan Martin tested the best MP3 players. Maybe this isn’t the sign that all portable physical devices are coming back. However, it is notable that MP3 players are back in the spotlight at a time when many are turning away from listening to music on their phones. Even if the music being played is digital, the fact that people want to buy a device and spend that money is encouraging:

An MP3 player? In 2025? Am I going to be covering Betamax and MiniDisc players next?

No, this isn’t a retro piece from the Filter. You may be reading this at least three years after Apple decided the iPod business was too niche to be worth bothering with, but MP3 players – or digital audio players, as they should more accurately be called – are seeing a small resurgence, despite the domination of Spotify, Apple Music and the like.

“In the past few years, since Covid, we’ve seen way more people looking to get a new MP3 player,” says Chris Laidler, office manager of Advanced MP3 Players, an Edinburgh store specialising in audio equipment.

The reasons are, essentially, threefold. First, there’s the pleasure of using something tangible: a nostalgia for devices with a single purpose, devoid of notifications and apps. More importantly, though, there’s a desire to have a music collection again – something led by the music-loving algorithm in your brain, rather than one outsourced to technology. “It’s their collection, rather than a playlist they’ve subscribed to,” says Laidler, and they own the music and aren’t simply “leasing it from Spotify”.

I sourced 15 modern MP3 players from the likes of Sony, Agptek, Majority, Shanling, iBasso and FiiO – which may not all sound that familiar, such is the niche we’re dealing with. While players can go for more than £1,000, I was keen to test mainstream devices, with the highest priced at £649 and the lowest at £30.

I supplemented this with two old Apple models via Backmarket, where preowned tech can get a second life rather than becoming e-waste. Neither made the list, however, for reasons I’ll get to later.

I listened to a lot of music in different environments. I became familiar with my old collection (out and about, and while connected directly to my Cambridge Audio AXA25 hifi). To get the most out of the high-end players, I borrowed a couple of high-end FiiO headsets from Advanced MP3 Players: the FH75 wired in-ear monitors, and the over-ear FT7 headphones. These offered a considerable improvement over my own somewhat tired headphones.

IN THIS PHOTO: The Activo P1/PHOTO CREDIT: Alan Martin/The Guardian

All the while, I diligently made mental notes about the look, feel, battery life and usability of each device, relative to its cost. File quality is also a factor, of course, and to that end, I not only played MP3s, but lossless Flac versions of the same track.

If you’ve done enough reading on the topic of digital audio players, you’ll have undoubtedly come across the Astell & Kern brand … and then possibly realised its products are out of your price range. Enter Activo: a sub-brand from the company, which promises to deliver a lot of what audiophiles want for considerably less cost.

Why we love it
While £399 represents a significant outlay, it’s nowhere near as pricey as some models and still offers a lot of bang for your buck. The dual-DAC structure provides high-resolution audio, aided by its Digital Audio Remaster upsampling tech, plenty of pre-programmed filters and a built-in EQ to modify 20 frequencies to your tastes.

File support is strong, and it has 3.5mm and 4.4mm balanced audio ports for wired connections, along with Bluetooth 5.3 for wireless playback. It can even work as an external DAC for your computer if you like.

It comes with 64GB of internal storage, and you can expand it with microSD cards of up to 1.5TB. It uses Android – which I always worry detracts from the point of a dedicated MP3 player – but it’s a highly pared-back version focused on music. The Google Play Store is here, but it’s really only present to allow you to install Spotify, Tidal or whatever your streaming poison is. It’s intuitive, smooth enough, and not trying to mimic your phone: you won’t find yourself distracted by social media nonsense.

It’s a shame that … it doesn’t have more dedicated physical playback buttons. That and its chunky size almost made me give the cheaper £346.80 Sony NW-A306 the nod, but Activo’s smoother, pared-back version of Android and additional 4.4mm output gave it the edge”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Dalila Dalprat/Pexels

This isn’t an isolated thing. Many younger people are ditching their smartphones for something more basic. Going back to older phones. Buying digital cameras and relying less on their phones. That is a positive move. Part of this is the resurgence of the MP3 player. This feature highlights how the reliance on smartphones is like an addition. This move back to the physical, or at least older devices and technology, is a healthy thing. Maybe a sign of things to come:

Why isn’t ‘Do Not Disturb’ enough?

The addictive nature of both social media and the phones we use to access social media is real. “Smartphones have the same chemical reaction in the brain as drugs and alcohol,” Melissa DiMartino, associate professor of psychology at New York Institute of Technology, tells Yahoo Life. “Getting ‘likes,’ messages and notifications from your phone releases dopamine, which makes us feel good. And, in turn, we want to repeat these feel-good behaviors.”

Looking at your phone to feel better becomes an addictive cycle that ultimately leads people to feel depressed and lonely when they aren’t getting those alerts, explains DiMartino. Increased anxiety and stress can also result from the continuous stream of updates and constant connectivity.

Once you open that phone, it’s like you just opened up Pandora’s box.

Ari Lightman, digital media and marketing professor

Interacting with a phone’s more standard operations, like calls and messages, is just a part of the sequence. “Once you open that phone, it’s like you just opened up Pandora’s box,” says Ari Lightman, professor of digital media and marketing at Carnegie Mellon University. He tells Yahoo Life that just checking the weather can entice a person to click on the app that sits right next to it, whether it is LinkedIn or Instagram. “Then there’s a sort of cascading series of actions that basically snap up all your time, even in ‘Do Not Disturb,’” he says.

Deleting apps is not a solution, because “there’s always a replacement,” says Lightman.

What do MP3 players and digital cameras have to do with it?

The use of dumb phones has ushered in the need for other legacy technology. Caleb’s Nokia flip phone, for example, is limited to playing FM radio, which influenced his decision to use a separate MP3 player to access his personal collection of music.

Some others, like 32-year-old Alex Biniaz-Harris, haven’t made the switch to dumb phones but use other technologies for listening to music or taking pictures, so that they can avoid getting sucked into more screen time. Biniaz-Harris tells Yahoo Life that he opts to bring his iPod on drives, while leaving his phone behind, so he can listen to music without the added distractions of his iPhone. Having more limited options than Spotify makes the experience more intentional and even nostalgic, he says.

IMAGE CREDIT: Yahoo News (photos from Getty Images)

Using a device with limited functionality ... can be a welcome escape from the pressures of constant connectivity.

Riani Kenyon, anthropologist and behavioral analyst

Nostalgia plays a key role in the switch to legacy technology among young people, says Riani Kenyon, an anthropologist and behavioral analyst at the consumer insights agency Canvas8. “Despite not having firsthand experience of the 1990s or early 2000s, Gen Z expresses a strong affinity for the era’s tangible, straightforward technology,” she tells Yahoo Life. “For many, using a device with limited functionality, one that prioritizes calls and texts over endless notifications, can be a welcome escape from the pressures of constant connectivity.”

The deliberate use of these tools for specific purposes enables “greater levels of concentration and autonomy of thought,” says Lightman, whereas an iPhone tends to require attention on everything at once.

Digital minimalism is a lifestyle choice

While taking time away from your smartphone might not seem like a big deal, committing to a life where you use your device either more intentionally or not at all is difficult in today’s interconnected world. “The convenience of modern smartphones, which consolidate navigation, communication and entertainment into a single device, is difficult to replicate with older technology,” says Kenyon”.

Cost is an issue when it comes to devices. You have to invest in something additional to your smartphone. For music listening, it is clear that MP3 players off a benefit of being digital and also physical. Excellent playback quality and plenty of options – if you shop around and do your research -, is this going to be a movement that sees people buy C.D. playing devices and something to play cassettes in? There are modern-day equivalents of the Walkman, and I have covered this before. Whilst that will not be as notable as the rise of the MP3 player, it is clear that many do not want to rely on their phone and want to detach. Play music without being sucked into their smartphones. In addition to the quality of what we hear, MP3 players and other devices allow us to focus on music and not be distracted by other functions on the phone.  Rather than being drenched in nostalgia, it is a way of being able to listen to music portably and get that quality but also not have to do everything on a smartphone. Something that can be additive and damaging. For that reason, the new surge in interest in MP3 players is good…

PHOTO CREDIT: Karolina Grabowska

FOR all of us.

FEATURE: Beautiful Feeling: PJ Harvey's Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea at Twenty-Five

FEATURE:

 

 

Beautiful Feeling

 

PJ Harvey's Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea at Twenty-Five

__________

THERE is no doubt that…

PHOTO CREDIT: Tony Mott

PJ Harvey is one of our best artists. Her fifth studio album ranks alongside her very best. Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea was another major commercial success story, following her successful breakthrough To Bring You My Love (1995). Upon its release, the album received massive acclaim. Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea earned Harvey several accolades, including the 2001 Mercury Prize. Released on 23rd October, 2000, I am going to mark twenty-five years of this incredible album. I will introduce some features and finish with a review. Although it only got to twenty-three in the U.K., the album has since been certified Platinum. Let’s start out with some background to the album:

“I wanted everything to sound as beautiful as possible,” said Polly Harvey of her fifth studio LP, Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea, in an interview with Q magazine. “Having experimented with some dreadful sounds on Is This Desire? and To Bring You My Love – where I was really looking for dark, unsettling, nauseous-making sounds – Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea was the reaction. I thought, No, I want absolute beauty. I want this album to sing and fly and be full of reverb and lush layers of melody. I want it to be my beautiful, sumptuous, lovely piece of work.”

Two decades on, the sumptuous Stories is the latest in Harvey’s ongoing reissues project, accompanied by a collection of its demos. It has a towering reputation in the Harvey catalogue, having won the first of her two Mercury Music Prizes in 2001, and it has become something of a fixture in ‘best albums’ lists. Where Is This Desire? married unsettling atmospherics with disquieting experimentation (just take a listen to the suffocating misery of “My Beautiful Leah” and “Joy”) often to darkly beautiful effect, Stories is the sound of openness – strident vocals, chiming guitars, harmonies, layers of melody. But crucially, it never forgoes her customary inventiveness for banal commerciality.

The notion of Harvey trading artistic, creative ingenuity for commercial success is, especially with the hindsight of her now almost 30-year career, preposterous; Stories may have a reputation as Harvey’s most accessible record, but are such moody jewels as “Beautiful Feeling” and “Horses In My Dreams” commercial? Doesn’t “Kamikaze” have more in common with her brutal first two records, 1992’s Dry and 1993’s Rid of Me? If it’s pop, as she later said, it’s “pop according to PJ Harvey.”

New York City looms large in Stories, from its genesis in the city where she filmed The Book of Life with Hal Hartley, to its myriad lyrical references (“on a rooftop in Brooklyn,” “I’m in New York,” “when we walked through Little Italy”). But it’s curious that, in fact, much of it was also written and initially recorded at Harvey’s home in Dorset and then produced for real at Linford Manor in Milton Keynes in March and April 2000 – about as un-New York as you can get. Working with her long-time collaborators Mick Harvey and Rob Ellis as the core trio of musicians, the Stories demos are, as with the previous instalments in this reissue series, routinely fascinating. This time they’re captivating for just how ‘demo-y’, for want of a better word, they are – yet how comprehensive. That’s the story of these Harvey demo albums – they clearly indicate that the bulk of these songs, arrangements and all, were all there from the beginning.

But where Is This Desire? was built almost entirely on top of those original demo tracks, Stories’ demos are more often than not true alternates. You can certainly detect parts of the originals that were then loaded into the multi-tracks and built upon (the gorgeous chiming guitars of “Good Fortune” were all there from the start, with Harvey’s Patti Smith-meets-Chrissie Hynde vocal re-recorded to become a little sleeker), but then you get something completely leftfield like the charmingly rustic “A Place Called Home,” with its drum machine pattern and more rudimentary presentation.

Harvey told the LA Times upon the album’s release in October 2000 that “it kind of feels like a combination of every album I’ve made so far rolled into one.” And it’s true that there is the balance between ferocious rockers (“Kamikaze”), slow-burning blues (“Horses In My Dreams”), and murky atmospherics (“Beautiful Feeling”) – but there’s also a newly lush, panoramic melodic and production style. “We Float” shimmers and opens out beautifully, “Good Fortune” is pop perfection, and “You Said Something” finds Harvey in classic songwriter mode. She told Hilton Als in Interview magazine that “I wrote the songs in a different way. I went back to writing songs just with guitar and voice, and the songs had to be strong enough to work at that level. I wasn’t relying at all on equipment, I wasn’t writing in the studio, I was just purely writing in time, if you like. I think that’s quite a good basis for writing strong songs”.

Opening their 2021 feature with the words “Considered an atypically ‘pop’ experiment and even doubted by its own author, Polly Jean Harvey’s fourth album was nevertheless her biggest UK album. Isn’t it time it’s considered simply a great record?”, Guitar.com investigated the genius of Stories From The City, Stories From The Sea:

Indeed, it’s actually a very simple record, with big bold melodies and minimal personnel – Polly Jean on guitar and vocals, Rob Ellis on keys and drums, and the Bad Seeds’ Mick Harvey on organ, bass, and drums. All three co-produced, and there’s a notable flash of superstar glitz in guest vocals by Radiohead’s Thom Yorke. And how ‘pop’, anyway, is a song like Kamikaze? Not very.

The title itself alluded to the songs’ creative birth: half written between Europe, London and her home in Dorset; the remainder were penned in New York, where Harvey lived for seven months prior to recording. With the cover picturing a gold-handbagged Harvey (sunglasses on: at night, natch) amid NYC’s neon streets, one might surmise big city glamour was reflected in the whole project, but that’s not strictly true either. Her time there may have informed a share of the songs (yet most of those songs are about escaping), and it was recorded in six weeks at the genteel English setting of the 17th-century Great Linford Manor recording studios, the nearest metropolis being the totally un-rock’n’roll Milton Keynes. At a push for hell-raisin’ cred, you can claim Marshall make amps down the road at Bletchley.

Of all PJ Harvey’s album’s Stories From The City, Stories From The Sea is perhaps the most instrumentally vivid. And her voice has rarely sounded more elastic. It kicks hard from the off. Opener Big Exit (“too many cops / too many guns!”) is clearly informed by life in the USA, and its clear-as-a-bell G-F-G-F riff grips like a choke-hold. It’s sparse, though. It’s only when the bass kicks in (defining a Dm) than any chordal identity really takes hold. The Whores Hustle And The Hustlers Whore is cut from similar rags, being a harsh-riffing disapproving stare onto the urban underbelly that seems to prompt flight not fight.

That ‘escape’ can be found in the overtly romantic A Place Called Home (“One day there’ll be a place for us / And the bells keep ringing… / and the girl keeps singing”). Meanwhile, This Is Love is downright dumb-sex lusty. Over a great deep fuzz riff, it doesn’t pretend to be anything more than a paean to happiness-in-sex. This, it should be said, is a good thing. Good Fortune is another “exit” song in which “I fantasize of our leaving / Like some modern-day gypsy landslide / Like some modern-day Bonnie and Clyde”. If all these songs were written in New York, it doesn’t sound like she much fancied anything more than a temporary visit.

Harvey’s guitar playing doesn’t often garner attention, but it’s to the fore on Stories… and not amid the grungeoid blast of her earlier records, bar the exception of hidden track This Wicked Tongue. A big part of Stories… was the bell-like tones of her 60s Gibson Firebird, though she still plugged into the 335-alike Gretsch Broadkaster used on her early records. She also used a rosewood board Fender Telecaster, like collaborator John Parish. Her amps are trusty classics: various Marshalls, Fenders, Mesa-BoogieVox AC-30s… Great Linford Manor would have had its own anyway.

It’s accessible, dare we say ‘commercial sounding’, but also highlights her own unique guitar playing and finely-honed sense of composition in a simple format. Not everyone likes it, of course. The credder-than-thou taste-makers of Pitchfork labelled it “tepid” and guilty of “style over substance” but that’s to miss the point of its position to Harvey’s overall career arc. If she spent her whole career writing songs about twisted relationships as on Dry, one would probably fear for her wellbeing. Stories… is thankfully happier than that”.

There are a couple of other features I want to get to before finishing off. In 2020, Albumism talked about a dramatic shift in terms of sounds and themes, PJ Harvey painted “vivid and sensual picture of life in New York City”. Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea won the Mercury Prize on 11th September, 2001. The event coincided with the 9/11 terror attacks in the U.S., with PJ Harvey learning of her award while in a Washington, D.C. hotel room and witnessing the Pentagon attack from her window:

Harvey has shown vulnerability on her previous recordings, but on Stories From The City, there's a beauty and joy that radiates throughout the entire album. It's just one of the many reasons why it's in my list of 20 albums I can't live without. The next two songs, "One Line" and "Beautiful Feeling,” bring the mood to a more tranquil place, with the latter being one of the darker yet gorgeous songs on the album (“And when I watch you move / And I can't think straight / And I am silenced / And I can't think straight / And it's the best thing / It's the best thing / The best thing / Such a beautiful feeling”).

The one song that does not have an overt reference to the album's romantic theme is "The Whores Hustle and the Hustlers Whore," a song whose lyrical DNA reminds me of a Lou Reed song. The subject matter is definitely in his wheelhouse, as evoked through lines like “Speak to me of heroin and speed / Of genocide and suicide, of syphilis and greed / Speak to me the language of love / The language of violence, the language of the heart / This isn't the first time I've asked for money or love / Heaven and earth don't ever mean enough / Speak to me of heroin and speed / Just give me something I can believe.”

<center><iframe width="500" height="400" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6JpgTkgrceY?si=xVO8bEoPmtpwYL2f" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

"This Mess We're In," along with the previously mentioned "Good Fortune," ranks high on the list of Harvey's best songs in her career. When I first listened to the track twenty years ago, I did not expect it to be a duet with Radiohead's Thom Yorke singing its first lyrics. The pairing of Harvey and Yorke is sheer perfection, and "This Mess We're In" made me want to hear more from them. Yorke also did backing vocals on "One Line" and "Beautiful Feeling," but this one stands out amongst the three. The song is about two lovers whose affair is approaching its end and the conversation leading up to that point, with the duo echoing each other, “What were you wanting? (What was it you wanted?) / I just want to say (I just want to say) / Don't ever change now baby (Don't ever change) / And thank you / I don't think we will meet again / And you must leave now / Before the sun rises over the skyscrapers / And the city landscape comes into being / Sweat on my skin / Oh, this mess we’re in.”

Additional highlights include "Kamikaze," "This Is Love," and the album send-off "We Float," which, like the opening track "Big Exit" musically and lyrically takes the listener to an unexpected place (“We wanted to find love / We wanted success / Until nothing was enough / Until my middle name was excess / And somehow I lost touch / When you went out of sight / When you got lost into the city / Got lost into the night”).

Harvey has always incorporated sex within the thematic thrust of her albums, but with Stories From The City, it feels different from her previous output. Her inspiration had come from another place in her life. Harvey was living in Dorset, England at the time, but a couple of lengthy stays in New York influenced her writing. "New York certainly gave me a different kind of energy,” she explained in a 2000 Los Angeles Times interview. “I do think that has permeated to some of the music. I had long wanted to [live there]. I made a film with Hal Hartley in New York, and I realized at that time what an inspiring sort of place it felt to me. I can remember even when we were filming, I was writing songs, some of which ended up on this record. I just felt very inspired”.

I am going to finish off with an article from Stereogum. I wonder if there are going to be new features written about Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea ahead of its twenty-fifth anniversary on 23rd October. Stereogum write how “The general-consensus narrative around PJ Harvey’s Stories From The City, Stories From The Sea goes something like this: It’s PJ Harvey’s happy album”:

Stories From The City wasn’t a hit in any conventional way, but it sold. Worldwide, the album moved about a million copies — roughly the same number that To Bring You My Love had done five years earlier. But To Bring You My Love had alt-rock radio airplay and 120 Minutes rotation working for it. That didn’t happen with Stories From The City, at least in the US. (In the UK, where the album went platinum, all three singles from Stories From The City just barely missed the top 40.)

Instead, Stories From The City found its audience through mainstream critical love, like Robert Christgau’s Rolling Stone rave. (Snotty young Pitchfork was more suspicious.) The album earned Harvey two Grammy nominations — in the rock category, not in the nebulous “alternative” zone. She lost to U2 and to Lucinda Williams, but that’s still pretty good company. (Stories From The City and Linkin Park’s Hybrid Theory, two albums that came out on the same day, both lost Best Rock Album to U2. These are the only things that Stories From The City and Hybrid Theory have in common.) More importantly, Stories From The City won the UK’s Mercury Prize, beating out huge albums from Radiohead and Basement Jaxx and Gorillaz. It was her first time winning that award. A decade later, she became the first artist in history to win it twice.

The day that Harvey won that first Mercury Prize happened to be September 11, 2001. Harvey had been gone from New York for more than a year at that point, but New York was still inscribed onto the album. After that day, it became impossible to hear Stories From The City the same way. When “You Said Something” plays, I think about the rooftop in Brooklyn, the lights flashing in Manhattan. I think about how the view changed, how many of those lights no longer exist. I’m guessing Harvey does, too. In the fall of 2001, Harvey was touring North America. The day she won the award, she was in Washington, DC, and she saw the wreckage of the Pentagon from her hotel room window. Harvey phoned into the Mercury Prize ceremony and sounded utterly shellshocked.

Harvey never even flirted with mass appeal after Stories From The City. Instead, she moved in more harsh and extreme directions, often brilliantly. This wasn’t a surprise. Harvey was always a restless artist. She always moved on. Stories From The City was a moment for her, and for me, and for everyone else who heard it. Shortly after the album’s release, worlds changed, in ways both normal and not. In the past 20 years, I haven’t returned to Stories From The City the way I have to Dry or Rid Of Me or To Bring You My Love. But that has less to do with the quality of the album itself, which rules, and more to do with the strange and uneasy and short-lived moment that it captured. When I think of it, I think of it fondly. I hope PJ Harvey does, too”.

I will finish off here. Perhaps PJ Harvey’s most remarkable album, I still think that it sounds revelatory and phenomenal twenty-five years later. If you have not heard the album before, then I would encourage you to do so. Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea earned Harvey PJ Harvey BRIT Award nominations as Best British Female Artist for two years running, as well as two GRAMMY Award nominations for Best Rock Album and Best Female Rock Performance for the single, This Is Love. Turning twenty-five on 23rd October, this masterpiece from PJ Harvey is…

ONE of the best albums ever.

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Gorillaz Hits and Deep Cuts

FEATURE:

 

 

The Digital Mixtape

 

Gorillaz Hits and Deep Cuts

__________

I have been a fan…

IMAGE CREDIT: Warner Records

of Gorillaz since their eponymous debut in 2001. The virtual group’s ninth studio album, The Mountain, will be released next year. It follows 2023’s Cracker Island. Created by Damon Albarn and artist Jamie Hewlett in 1998, this is a unique and stunning group whose music has remained consistently brilliant and inventive since their debut. I love Damon Albarn and he is one of the best songwriters of all time. His voice carried such gravity and character. Because Gorillaz have announced another album, I want to use this opportunity to compile a Gorillaz mixtape. Featuring their biggest songs and some deep cuts. An introduction to those who do not know about them or a reminder and refresh for those who have been fans for years. Before getting there, NME provided details about the upcoming The Mountain:

Gorillaz have announced new album ‘The Mountain’, alongside UK and Ireland tour dates and shared new single ‘The Happy Dictator’ featuring Sparks.

It comes after the Damon Albarn-led animated band debuted their upcoming ninth LP during the final of four gigs at London’s Copper Box Arena earlier this month. Fans attending the show weren’t allowed access to their mobile phones, but many took to social media afterwards to share details of the album and the multitude of special guests included on it.

Now, Gorillaz have officially announced the record, which is called ‘The Mountain’ and due out on March 20, 2026. It will mark the first release on the band’s own new label KONG, and you can pre-order it here.

Today (September 11), they’ve also shared the first taste of the record with ‘The Happy Dictator’, a theatrical collaboration with Sparks that sees Albarn sing: “No more bad news, so you can sleep well at night and the palace of your mind will be bright.”

Alongside the album, the band have also announced a UK and Ireland tour, set to kick off in March 2026. They’ll play in Birmingham, Glasgow, Leeds, Cardiff, Nottingham, Liverpool, Belfast and Dublin, as well as a one-off headline show at London’s Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, with support from Sparks and Trueno”.

I will get to the mixtape. The extraordinary Gorillaz are always surprising. They collaborate with such a great range of artists and their albums always sound different. They do not repeat themselves. I am excited to see what The Mountain sounds like. I wanted to highlight the brilliance of Gorillaz and provide a much deserved salute to…

A genius virtual group.

FEATURE: The Most Beautiful Sunset: Kate Bush’s Aerial at Twenty

FEATURE:

 

 

The Most Beautiful Sunset

PHOTO CREDIT: Trevor Leighton

 

Kate Bush’s Aerial at Twenty

__________

IT seems so odd…

celebrate the twentieth anniversary of Kate Bush’s Aerial. It does not seem like the album came out that long ago, because I remember it so clearly! Very happy and personal memories of listening to the album not long after it came out. Released on 7th November, 2005, in the first of five features ahead of its twentieth anniversary, I want to explore various sides of the album. I am going to start out by sourcing a couple of promotional interviews for Aerial. Some chats with Kate Bush from 2005. I am also going to share some critical reviews/features, and I also want to discuss why Aerial is so spellbinding. I shall give some context. We celebrated forty years of Hounds of Love on 16th September. In many ways, Aerial is similar to Hounds of Love. Released just over twenty years later, like Hounds of Love, Aerial has a conceptual side. Or, as Aerial is a double album, a conceptual second disc. A Sky of Honey is this course of a summer’s day. A full cycle where we get to see this transformation of the light. Basking in the beauty and transcendence. In a later piece, I will discuss what more could come from Aerial. In terms of a book or visualisation. It is a magnificent conceptual suite that is among Kate Bush’s most accomplished works. Bush released The Red Shoes in November 1993. Twelve years later, when many felt she would never release another album, she released something truly unexpected. The Red Shoes is a great album but not considered one of her best. Aerial was this radically different album. Especially in terms of its scope and production. Bush’s production on both albums. The Red Shoes more compressed or tinny. Aerial is this lush, airy and open album.

The first interview I want to source is, I’d imagine, a phone interview with The Toronto Star. After so long since she released an album, a lot of the press and questioning was around her being a ‘recluse’ or ‘weird’. Never able to avoid these descriptions and judgements, she released a masterpiece with her eighth studio album. Although the deepest interview for Aerial were on the radio, there are some interesting print interviews. This one is particularly engaging;

Cheerful and talkative except when it comes to details of her personal life Bush sounds genuinely at a loss to explain her reputation in the media as a wacky recluse.

"Reclusive, mysterious and weird it's ridiculous, isn't it? Just because I've chosen to live a normal life, and not in the public eye. I've never promoted myself, I'm not a celebrity, I'm a worker, and I don't see a reason to do interviews unless there's something to talk about, a piece of work.

"I don't hide from people. I go shopping, I go to restaurants and movies ... yet somehow I'm made out to be some mad hermit. It's too much.

"I think my cult following got grumpy waiting so long," she laughs.

That all sounds a bit disingenuous in light of the number of high-end European art and fashion photographers whose ubiquitous images of Bush created at least the impression of a showbiz diva between 1978 and 1990, when an eight-CD anthology appeared in the box set This Woman's Work complete with a colour booklet containing nothing but these extravagant portraits.

In lieu of personal appearances erroneous reports of stage fright that have apparently prevented her from touring after 1979 are another bone of contention with her fans have had nothing to fuel their addiction other than Bush's wild, rich and allusive music, and magnificent, stylized graphics.

"I never consciously gave up touring," she explains. "I only did just one, in 1979 and 1980, and I think other people gave up on me. I remember it as a fantastic experience, like being on the road with a circus. We're working on some ideas about doing some shows to promote this album, but it's early days."

And she says she has no regrets about the image she helped create, though Aerial comes unadorned with large and ornate likenesses of her, and instead features realistic images of the ornaments of an ordinary village life washing on the line, a view from the kitchen window, a placid seashore, pigeons in the yard.

"Graphics are important," she adds, by way of explaining the effort that went into designing the honeyed landscape artwork for Aerial. "This may sound pompous, but I'm uncomfortable working with the CD format. I used to work in vinyl, when the artwork was big, and said something significant about an artist.

"And I loved double albums. They indicated that the music was conceptual, too important to be reduced, and you could open up the covers and get lost in the pictures and information inside.

"I liked it when an album was 20 minutes of music a side, with a breathing space in the middle. I think CDs are too long for people with short attention spans, people who are distracted by all the technological tools we have these days."

The Aerial format, she explains, is a respectful nod to the great days of vinyl. The package contains two discs, both around 40 minutes in length, the first a collection of single songs, the second a conceptual piece that unfolds as a musical panorama encompassing the span of a single day, with vast dreams and powerful reminiscences inspired by simple sounds of nature, the words of passers-by and routine chores.

The album lacks the frenetic pace and bluster of her last conceptual effort, 1985's Hounds Of Love, and achieves an almost elegiac, English pastoral grace. Several songs feature just vocals and piano, and expose matters closer to her heart than the turgid melodramas of her earlier work: the joy childhood brings in "Bertie," memories of her late mother in the eerie but strangely comforting waterscape "A Coral Room," the bucolic "Sky Of Honey" with its compelling echoes of Vaughan Williams.

Orchestral charts were written by award-winning composer Michael Kamen, who died of a heart attack at age 55 in 2003. They were recorded just weeks before his death.

"He was a lovely person, very talented and brave," Bush recalls. "I'd worked with him on other albums, and he was never offended if I suggested changes he'd rewrite arrangements on the spot, even with the orchestra waiting in the studio. I admire his work for its visual qualities."

While it's debatable, as acolytes claim, that Kate Bush's impact on Western music and female artists in particular is as profound as Joni Mitchell's, it can't be denied that Bush has attracted more than a fair share of serious attention from new artists in the years since her so-called self-exile began. This includes R&B singer Maxwell, whose reworking of Bush's childbearing chronicle "This Woman's Work" was a hit in 2001, as well as male-dominated British rock acts Placebo and The Futureheads, who scored a hit last year with a version of her "Hounds of Love."

Her beginnings were more than auspicious. Bush was "discovered" at age 16 by Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour. He who paid for an orchestra to back her distinctive, hyperbolic soprano on demos of several elaborately theatrical, sexually loaded romantic fantasies that would become the core, three years later, of her hair-raising debut, The Kick Inside.

Though she had nothing in common with the post-punk, new wave acts with whom she shared the high end of the charts she was genteel, well educated, and possessed of aesthetic and artistic sensibilities that had less to do with rock than with the progressive side of opera, world music, jazz, musical theatre and epic cinema she became the darling of British prog-rock. Peter Gabriel gave her a nod by recording the moving duet, "Don't Give Up" with her in 1986. Procol Harum member Gary Brooker's organ and vocal contributions anchor Aerial, an exotic two-CD set.

Some pieces on Aerial will remind fans of the daring Kate Bush of old: "Pi" is little more than a series of numbers sung with dramatic extremes of emotion; "King Of The Mountain," the first single, is a contemplation on celebrity and its cost, with direct references to Elvis; in "Mrs. Bartolozzi," a washing machine becomes a sexual allegory in the romantic fantasies of a cleaning woman.

"After seven years with Bertie, I know a lot about washing machines," Bush chuckles. "He keeps me normal. I never wanted to be famous. I just want to create nice music, and I believe celebrity threatens creativity.

"What's important to me is to have a soul and my lovely little boy”.

I am going to come to another international interview. In December 2005, Weekend Australian published a great interview with Kate Bush. Iain Shedden asked the questions. Although I have sourced some of these words before, as Aerial is twenty on 7th November, it is worth coming back. What was being asked in 2005. How Bush responded. After being away from the media’s fascination and scrutiny for over a decade, it must have been odd to be back in promotional mode. Professional, warm and fascinating as ever, few could deny the genius and wonder of Aerial:

Her tone is light-hearted, salt-of-the-earth friendly, occasionally mischievous and peppered with self-deprecating humour. If this is the Greta Garbo of pop, she has had a crash course in gregariousness.

"I'm in a privileged position to say that I'm very happy," she goes on. "I'm very lucky. I'm even happier now that the album has been received with such ..." She searches for the right phrase. "I have never been so surprised. It's extraordinary. I was really worried that people were going to forget me."

Well, they could hardly have been blamed for that, could they? Taking a 12-year break between albums is unusual. The fickle world of pop demands that you ride the wave of success until it dumps you unceremoniously on your backside.

Bush, on the other hand, decided after her 1993 album The Red Shoes that the music business could take a running jump. Enough with fame; she was going to have a life.

"I was working very hard trying to be an artist," she recalls of her heyday. "Somehow I just wasn't being seen as who I was. I was being mistranslated. It was very frustrating."

So, after 15 years, a handful of albums and with a string of hit singles including Them Heavy People, Sat in Your Lap and Breathing behind her, Bush said goodbye to the charts, the recording studio and the spotlight to devote herself to things that she believed were more real, such as cleaning the house and, eventually, having a child.

Both these subjects are addressed on Aerial. Bertie gets a few mentions and did the artwork that appears on Bush's recent single, King of the Mountain, while domesticity in the shape of a washing machine gets a full cycle on Mrs Bartolozzi.

It's no accident that these and other quality-of-life issues dominate the two CDs that make up Aerial. Bush wrote some of the material for it in the years immediately following her retirement, when she was looking for something more than artistic fulfillment.

It wasn't the writing that took so long, she explains, more the recording.

“I think a lot of people think I spend years writing stuff," she says. "I don't. It's shockingly quick."

WHAT took her so long to make a comeback was combining her home life with the recording process. She tackled the latter in her spare moments, which became less frequent after the birth of Bertie.

"A lot of my friends couldn't carry on working when they had a child," she says. "They either had to get child care or they had to stop working. I feel very privileged that I was able to do both [working and parenting], but I was also very tired.

"It's difficult to do both. I made a conscious decision early on that my son would come first."

Her record company, EMI, fretted as another year went by and Aerial remained a work in progress. Company executives went to visit, hoping to hear it at last, or at least some part of it. Most often they left, disappointed, after an earful of tea and cakes.

Early this year, however, their patience was rewarded. The headline on Kitty Empire's review in British newspaper The Observer was: "Admit it, guys, she's a genius". For Bush the album's release and the positive reaction to it have been a validation of her methods, but the proof came only after months of worrying about how the public would react.

"When I was most anxious was when there was this huge amount of anticipation starting to build about the record and I hadn't actually finished it," she says, laughing. "It's hard enough trying to keep that creative focus without feeling that everybody's banging on the door going, `Where is it?' Mind you, I've got good soundproofing." Now that it's done, she says, the relief is palpable. Hardly surprisingly, after that period of gestation she hasn't been able to listen to Aerial.

"I always put myself under a lot of pressure. It is not an enjoyable process spending 12 years making a record. Lots of it was fun but it wasn't something I intended to take 12 years to make.

"I'm so fed up listening to it, I can't tell you. The sense of relief at actually having it finished ... that was one of the greatest senses of elation, after all that time. There were so many points where I felt, almost in a religious sense, that I wasn't going to have the strength to carry on."

Now that the album is out and in the charts, there will be some expectation, from her record company as well as her fans, of another one appearing before her 60th birthday. So will she make one?

"I hope so," she says. "It's not meant to be my last work. Of course I'd really like to make another one."
Nor is she ruling out performing again. She has even returned to dancing after a long break.

"This is the first time in years I've had time to do other things, so I've just started again recently. It's something I've always enjoyed, but it doesn't hold the same importance to me any more. That's the thing about dance, it's such a discipline. You can't have too many airs and graces because it's all about the fragility of the body. It's really hard work. Being a dancer for a living ... I've got so much respect for people like that, being so strong."

Bush has other strengths, however. She has withstood the pressures the music industry can impose on artists to do things their way and has made herself happy in the process.

"There were quite a few times where I found the way I was living my life was more ... I thought it had more value than someone who was living the life of a celebrity," she says.

"What is amazing about the way people have responded to this record is that I did approach things that way. People get it. It's incredibly freeing."

It's as liberating, perhaps, as Wuthering Heights was to that unknown singer 27 years ago. Does she still see herself as she was in that video?

"I think in essence I am much the same person," she says. "But in other ways I've changed tremendously. I'm glad I have, though. Imagine going through life without any changes at all. How depressing is that!”.

I will look at the songs and various sides of Aerial in future features. Whereas I have now looked at the promotional interviews and the ‘sunrise’, the ‘sunset’, I guess, comes from critical reviews. As there was such anticipation and excitement, it could have backfired. A double album that had filler or was not that great could have had a huge impact on Kate Bush. As it was, she released one of her very best albums. Gaining almost unanimous praise, I think it is up there with Hounds of Love in terms of brilliance and legacy. How Bush releasing her first album of the twenty-first century confirmed her place in history. This pioneering artist who was so consistent and also proved she is one of the music world’s greatest producers.

There are review options to choose from. I want to start with this review from Stylus. They were blown away by an album that, whilst not perfect in their view, was simply stunning and moving. Engaging with a work from an artist that was leagues ahead of anyone else. Someone who releases the most individual, original and wonderful music. So different to anything that was released in 2005. Aerial still sounds epic and truly engrossing twenty years later:

Kate Bush has been changing the world since before I was born. I am now 26 and Kate is comfortably in her 40s; logic, sense and precedence decree that she should no longer be relevant, that her record releases, like those of The Rolling Stones—hell, like those of U2 and REM—should be treated with a muted fanfare by the industry and certain sections of the press and with glum bathos by everyone else as returns steadily diminish and distant peaks are listlessly recreated in Xeroxed monochrome.
But this is Kate Bush.

It has been 27 years since “Wuthering Heights,” since a 19-year-old girl in leggings danced like a white witch on Top Of The Pops. 12 years since The Red Shoes. It is 20 years since I saw her on Wogan, performing “Running Up That Hill (A Deal With God),” since Hounds Of Love. Aerial comes in two parts—A Sea Of Honey and A Sky Of Honey. The former is 7 songs over 38 minutes, a paean to domestic bliss, to chores and children and Citizen Kane and Joan of Arc and Elvis. The latter is 9 songs over 42 minutes (with some editing, and I’m talking seconds removed, the two could be combined), a day in the life of light from dawn through afternoon and dusk to the monochrome glaze of moonlight. A double song-cycle about bliss mundane and ecstatic, familial and artistic.

Sonically Aerial is a Kate Bush record in the style of The Dreaming and The Hounds Of Love: luscious, experimental, romantic (of course). The palette may be a touch dated in this post-Timbaland, post-Fennesz age, but it is still beautiful. There are huge expanses of piano—the oceanic, mournful swoon of “Mrs. Bartolozzi”—and strange, post-ambient pop grooves for dancing to alone as if immersed in a pagan ritual (“King Of The Mountain”). There is birdsong, and lots of it; there are guitars, dubby basslines, Latinised rhythms, strange and unidentifiable spirals and planes of sound summoned perhaps from synthesizers. And most of all, of course, there is Kate’s voice, a thousand instruments unto itself, delivering words both sublime and ridiculous.

There will be doubts, because Kate Bush’s genius and muse is a female genius and muse and thus utterly different to what we expect from… Mark Hollis? Michael Jackson? Stevie Wonder? Thom Yorke? (Don’t make me laugh.) Jimi Hendrix? David Bowie? Any man, ever. None of them could get away with enunciating words like “Slooshy sloshy slooshy sloshy / Get that dirty shirt clean”; none of them would even dare. Well, maybe Bowie would. We seem to think genius is a male trait. We’re wrong. The candour and honesty with which Kate delivers the lines “You bring me so much joy / And then you bring me / More joy” on “Bertie,” an unashamedly sentimental song about her love for her son, are a broadside to anyone who’s ever shied away from emotion, from love, from the things that make us human and remarkable and which convinced us we must have come from the clouds such is our potential for beauty.

She duets with birds, invites Rolf Harris once again to play didgeridoo (23 years after he first did on The Dreaming), juxtaposes Michael Kamen’s ethereal, modernist strings with bluesy rock guitars and unhurried disco beats, sings of washing machines, mathematics, sex, the sea and spiritual transcendence. She is still relevant because she doesn’t seek relevance—Kate Bush has always been external to trends, to the fluctuating verisimilitudes of popular culture. She has always operated within a world of her own creation, and that is why she will always be enticing, enlivening, fascinating.

Frankly it’s an honour to be on the same planet as her. Because, even after 12 years of laundry and washing the dishes and making fairy cakes and raising a child, she is still absolutely visionary, a creative talent and empathy untrammelled by conceit or time or self-consciousness; she is a genius. Aerial isn’t perfect, but it is magnificent”.

The Guardian awarded Aerial five stars. They noted how the release of this album was like an event. In some ways, you can look at major artists today whose album release is this event and huge occasion. A real sense of this music royal gifting the world with something truly magnificent. Even though Kate Bush was not someone on social media and doing lots of T.V. interviews, there was rightful buzz. Even though EMI did not spend a load on promotional and everything, the fact this was a new Kate Bush album was special enough:

In the gap since 1993's so-so The Red Shoes, the Kate Bush myth that began fomenting when she first appeared on Top of the Pops, waving her arms and shrilly announcing that Cath-ee had come home-uh, grew to quite staggering proportions. She was variously reported to have gone bonkers, become a recluse and offered her record company some home-made biscuits instead of a new album. In reality, she seems to have been doing nothing more peculiar than bringing up a son, moving house and watching while people made up nutty stories about her.

Aerial contains a song called How to Be Invisible. It features a spell for a chorus, precisely what you would expect from the batty Kate Bush of popular myth. The spell, however, gently mocks her more obsessive fans while espousing a life of domestic contentment: "Hem of anorak, stem of wallflower, hair of doormat."

Domestic contentment runs through Aerial's 90-minute duration. Recent Bush albums have been filled with songs in which the extraordinary happened: people snogged Hitler, or were arrested for building machines that controlled the weather. Aerial, however, is packed with songs that make commonplace events sound extraordinary. It calls upon Renaissance musicians to serenade her son. Viols are bowed, arcane stringed instruments plucked, Bush sings beatifically of smiles and kisses and "luvv-er-ly Bertie". You can't help feeling that this song is going to cause a lot of door slamming and shouts of "oh-God-mum-you're-so-embarrassing" when Bertie reaches the less luvv-er-ly age of 15, but it's still delightful.

Aerial sounds like an album made in isolation. On the down side, that means some of it seems dated. You can't help feeling she might have thought twice about the lumpy funk of Joanni and the preponderance of fretless bass if she got out a bit more. But, on the plus side, it also means Aerial is literally incomparable. You catch a faint whiff of Pink Floyd and her old mentor Dave Gilmour on the title track, but otherwise it sounds like nothing other than Bush's own back catalogue. It is filled with things only Kate Bush would do. Some of them you rather wish she wouldn't, including imitating bird calls and doing funny voices: King of the Mountain features a passable impersonation of its subject, Elvis, which is at least less disastrous than the strewth-cobber Aussie accent she adopted on 1982's The Dreaming. But then, daring to walk the line between the sublime and the demented is the point of Kate Bush's entire oeuvre. On Aerial she achieves far, far more of the former than the latter. When she does, there is nothing you can do but willingly succumb”.

I wanted to start out with this overview. Some interviews and reviews. A sense of how the album was being talked about and what critics were saying. In future features, I am going to look at the songs and the legacy of Aerial. How it still has life left in it. On 7th November, we mark twenty years of this double album that is an undoubted masterpiece. The awe-inspiring Aerial from Kate Bush is…

ARGUABLY her best album.

FEATURE: The Singles Club: 2025, and an Especially Strong Year for New Music

FEATURE:

 

 

The Singles Club

IN THIS PHOTO: Olivia Dean

 

2025, and an Especially Strong Year for New Music

__________

ALTHOUGH the albums…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kae Tempest

released this year have been fantastic and among the best of the past decade, I think that the singles released have been particularly strong. I will look at some of the best albums of 2025 in a future feature. I will revisit singles later in the year but, as I think about the music that has been released so far in 2025, there have been some really incredible moments that have lingered in my mind and affected me. I will highlight eleven singles that I would put among my favourite of this year. I will highlight HAIM’s Relationships, Doechii’s Anxiety, The Last Dinner Party’s This Is the Killer Speaking, Wolf Alice’s Just Two Girls, Sam Wills’ Amelia, Iraina Mancini’s Running for your life, Suede’s Dancing with the Europeans and CMAT’s Take a Sexy Picture of Me. I will also include Olivia Dean’s Nice to Each Other and Kae Tempest’s Diagnoses. These are just examples of songs that have particularly resonated with me. A lot of British (and Irish) talent. In years where I would normally favour releases from American artists, it is homegrown music that has struck a chord with me harder in 2025. I am not sure whether anyone has statistics, but it seems like this year has been especially prolific and eclectic. Maybe artists putting out more singles ahead of album releases. There have been some astonishing songs from rising artists. Those coming through and putting out these early cuts. I think a lot of articles highlight songs from bigger artists. To be fair, I will include a few of those. However, there are so many gems from newer artists which have struck my ear. Including Punishers from Die Spitz and Look Down on Us from Maruja. I have been drawn to albums, of course, but I have found my mind engaging more with singles. A spread of wonderful songs from established greats and newer artists. The singles market has never been stronger!

Although it is impossible to cover them all, I have found a few that have gone into my mind and are still very much there. I am going to start out with a sweeping and anthemic songs from a band who I have been following since the 1990s. Suede’s latest album is Antidepressants. They have said in an interview with NME how there are no bands of their generation making records and vital as them. That may seem boastful, but listening to their latest material, they may have a point! I have not always been committed to Suede. Maybe more attached to their earlier material. However, Dancing with the Europeans is a song that I really like. I have heard some it is not as engaging as recent Suede singles, though I think that Dancing with the Europeans is this stirring and standout song that is definitely one of my favourite songs of this year. DORK ran a feature where Suede’s lead discussed this emphatic and impassioned single:

There’s a sense of optimism about this song,” Brett Anderson says of ‘Dancing With The Europeans’. “I remember specifically we were doing a gig in Spain during the time we were writing this album. I was going through a bad time and at a low, personally. But we played this brilliant gig. There was a great connection between me and the audience. I thought of the phrase, dancing with the Europeans. There’s something about that word, Europeans, that I really like. The phrase summed up the experience of looking for connection in a disconnected world. This sense of, where do we find those bonds with our fellow human beings? That show in Spain broke down those barriers”.

There are a couple of incredible singles from queens of music that rank alongside my standout choices from this year. I have mentioned CMAT more than a couple of times recently, and quite rightly! The Mercury Prize-nominated EURO-COUNTRY is among the best albums from 2025. It has more than its fair share of standout songs. Released in May, it is the combination of a catchy and beautiful chorus together with the distinct songwriting talents of CMAT that make this a tremendous single! In a hugely strong year, NME highlighted the single upon its release:

CMAT has shared the empowering new single ‘Take A Sexy Picture Of Me’, which calls out those who have previously criticised her appearance.

The single marks the latest to be shared from the Irish singer-songwriter’s new album ‘EURO-COUNTRY’. Set to arrive on August 29, Ciara Mary-Alice Thompson announced the record back in March and also shared the first preview in the form of uplifting lead single ‘Running/Planning’.

Now, the latest track to be shared shows another side of the forthcoming record, and sees CMAT boldly stand up to those trying to knock others down with hateful comments.

“So you see/ I’ve been having a horrible time/ Of late, I get none of your sympathy/ But all of the pain hits and the fog lifts/ And then it’s too much for therapy,” she sings in the build-up to the chorus.

“With the internet, every woman is now in the public eye. And no matter who you are, or what you look like, somebody will take umbrage with the fact that you even exist, and there’s no escaping it,” CMAT explained. “‘Take a Sexy Picture of Me’ was born out of that, because I held back for so long; not out of frustration or sadness for myself, because I AM in the public eye, but I realised it’s actually like this for every woman.

“It’s all women, all the time. That song is me calling out anyone who criticised my weight or how I looked… and it’s one of the best songs I’ve ever made”.

I am going to move to HAIM and Relationships. I have been a fan of theirs for years now. Their new album, i quit, was released in June. I am bringing in words and reviews from others, not only to enforce my view of how strong the singles are. It is also worth bringing in some various takes. Part of this new chapter and fantastic album, it did gain a lot of positive press. Both classic HAIM but also a bit similar to music from their 2020 album, Women in Music Pt. III, it might be one of the best things they have released. Again, a bit of a classic from his year. A stunning single from a year that has offered a load of them. CLASH delivered their verdict on Relationships:

Musically, it carries traces of DNA from the outstanding ‘Women In Music Pt. III’ released in 2020. The revisitation of vintage, analogue sounds and warped digital modernity teases a subtle extension rather than reinvention. Whether this turns out to be something of a red herring remains to be seen. The production, meanwhile, sounds crystalline as ever; Este’s bass glides, serene keyboards cast a melancholic shimmer, and the drum track provides something fabulously addictive and kinetic.

From a lyrical perspective, it appears to invert the sentiments displayed on the ‘Something To Tell You’ lead single ‘Want You Back’. Instead of a reversion to a past relationship that ended too soon, Danielle sings about one she can’t wait to exit from: “I hear a voice in my head / And it keeps asking, ‘Why am I in this relationship?’ / Baby, how can I explain / When an innocent mistake / Turns into seventeen days?” Of course, ‘The Wire’ dealt with similar tribulations, albeit in a much more playful manner. Perhaps the difference here is the slight but audible undertone of sadness, especially during the verses and it results in a more emotionally complex offering than a few cursory listens would indicate.

Almost 12 years on from ‘Days Are Gone’, Danielle, Este and Alana’s knack for crafting a marvellously glossy pop earworm shows no sign of diminishing. If HAIM are indeed entering their imperial phase, ‘Relationships’ is one hell of an introduction”.

The band market has been healthy this year. Although most singles released this year have been from solo artists, I do think that some group-made tracks rank alongside the best solo cuts. I shall highlight two singles from two of our best bands. The Last Dinner Party release their second studio album, From the Pyre, on 17th October. Alongside HAIM and Suede, The Last Dinner Party show that band music is in no danger of fading in quality. Because of its incredible lead vocal and a wonderfully interesting composition and set of lyrics, this is a single that has nestled in my mind. I have seen some say that the chorus is not as punchy and strong as their previous singles. However, This Is the Killer Speaking boasts a pretty memorable and fine chorus from a group that I really love. This is what The Indiependent said about This Is the Killer Speaking:

The new record is described as being “the sound of a band having a lot of fun” rather than it being a reflection of them “feeling any innate pressure to follow-up on what was an explosively successful debut record. It’s also the sound of a young band developing and maturing their songwriting together”.

This is clear from the get go. It starts off slow, with a beat and tempo that resemble that of a 1950’s Nashville record, a trope that the pop music industry has seen a rise in over the past eighteen months, with the likes of Chappell Roan and Sabrina Carpenter making country mainstream again.

The track speeds up around the one minute mark. The pre chorus’ oxymoronic lyrics “Good morning, good looking! This is the killer speaking / Good morning, handsome! This is the killer on the line”, being a fitting way to show off the track’s combination of genres. Their darkly humorous nature helps smooth the transition from raw country riffs into a mainstream indie-pop beat with ease.

Despite the catchy chorus showing similarities in style, tone and genre to their other hit singles ‘Nothing Matters’ and ‘The Feminine Urge’ this is an individual record in its own right. It returns to its slower, country-esque beat and temp after the chorus before picking the pop beat back up for one final run in moments that for me had glimpses of the work of Lady A and The Chicks.

Edgy lyrics in the final verse, such as “You look like a weeping saint / With your infected eye and “And I’m down so bad / Hope my television appearance drives you fucking mad!” paint the band in a more mature light whilst still allowing them to maintain their lyrical solidarity along with their almighty fierce yet somewhat camp presence.

So, whilst this track is a masterclass from The Last Dinner Party in genre-bending as well as lyrically maturing and evolving as a band, it also stays true to their indie roots and as long as they are still doing that, nothing (else) matters”.

Doechii is an artist I only discovered near the start of this year. I can see she is going to be a future Rap icon. I also want to see her live too. I thought that DENIAL IS A RIVER was my favourite song of hers. However, Anxiety might have topped that! Her mixtape, Alligator Bites Never Heal, was released last year. This is a new song. I am not sure if Anxiety will form part of a new E.P. or album. So inventive when it comes to her lyrics and compositions, I think Doechii is one the most talented and passionate rappers in the world. I am going to come back to CLASH and their review of Anxiety. It is not only the songs that hit hard. Doechii’s videos are incredible and always burst over with personality and passion. Someone who really wants the visuals to represent the song and come off as these mini masterpieces. Which they are! I can see Doechii appearing in some great films:

Teased earlier this week, new single ‘Anxiety’ comes at a crucial time for the rapper. ‘Alligator Bites Never Heal’ has been clutched by fans, but she’s clearly ready to stretch a little, and see where she could go next.

As a result, ‘Anxiety’ crosses multiple lands. There’s a soul vocal, some revelatory lyricism, and hard-hitting flows, with a unique sample flip at the centre – yep, she’s re-tooled Gotye’s one-off 00s smash ‘Somebody That I Used To Know’ as an ultra-funky bedrock for introspection.

The lyrics find Doechii crushed by expectation, dealing with problems both external and internal. She rhymes: “Fightin’ with my demons and my demons is winnin’ / I feel like don’t nobody ever feel how I feel…”

Cross-referencing Jacques Cousteau and abolitionist campaigner Harriet Tubman, Doechii throws name upon name, attempting to come to grips with her situation.

Often, the bluntest lines shine out – the crippling “You keep the fame, I just wanna get paid” for example, displays the paradox at the centre of the hype.

It’s also a personal moment. ‘Anxiety’ finds Doechii working towards self-forgiveness, embracing a rounded maturity that can be lost amid the brash glare of the spotlight. At one point she rhymes: “Made mistakes, ain’t no way to rewind / But fuck it, we get over shit over time…”

Another crucial step forwards, ‘Anxiety’ finds one of American rap’s brightest natural talents magnifying her skills”.

I am going to end by exploring my favourite three singles of the year. I have not even mentioned essential examples from the likes of Lambrini Girls and Antony Szmierek. It just goes to show how strong this year has been! Most of the singles I have connected with have come via BBC Radio 6 Music. That is my stations of choice, so their picks and guidance is always influential. However, I have been listening to BBC Radio 1 and BBC Radio 2. Their recommendations are pretty decent. However, with BBC Radio 6 Music, there are so many singles that are right up my street. Bands like Coach Party. Too many to mention. However, before I get to my favourite three, I want to mention Kae Tempest. His music is so powerful. One of the world’s great wordsmiths, Diagnoses is so moving because it seems his most personal song to date. Tempest is someone who I feel used to write in a more abstract or fantastical way. There were personal and really incredible songs that revealed so much soul and tenderness. However, there were character-driven tracks. His recent material gives us a deeper understanding and glimpse into his mind and heart. I am surprised Kae Tempest’s Self Titled album did not get nominated for the Mercury Prize. It seems like an oversight! Diagnoses is one of the standout singles from this year. The Line of Best Fit published news of Diagnoses back in June:

Of the song, Kae Tempest says: "It’s a Summer banger about antipsychotics and HRT. And loving each other regardless of how mental we are.” The song is a dexterous exploration of neurodiversity, ‘me and you and our trauma flashbacks, relaxing at home with a Horlicks. Backpacks stuffed full of my dysphoria, your dyspraxia | off exploring | panic attacks to get the heart rate up.’

A sample from the godfather of modern psychology, Carl Jung, opens ‘Hyperdistillation’ – “it’s a reminder to look again,” explains Tempest, “we are all more alive than we give each other credit for."

Working with the Grammy-winning producer behind Adele and Stormzy for the first time on an album sparked a union that saw a flood of new ideas and unexpected directions. Fraser encouraged Kae to be both an active participant in production and guided him to write in the first person, to tell his own story. The result is a body of work that sees Kae Tempest reconnect with his Hip Hop roots while paying a gentle homage to contemporary pop”.

Prior to getting to the ‘big three’, it is worth highlighting an incredible single from Olivia Dean. Nice to Each Other was released in May. Dean released the Mercury Prize-nominated Messy in 2023. I cannot wait for her second album. She is a real gem of an artist. Such a captivating human! Someone whose voice melts the heart but also gets the blood running. So many aspects and emotions that perfectly fit with the lyrics. Someone that is going to go down as one of the greats. Aside from pretty much every review I am sourcing saying that these singles are ‘returns’ and ‘comebacks’ from artists, which f*cking pisses me off no end, their insights are valuable. It does seem you need to release new music every month or else you are deemed as gone or dormant! Olivia Dean is someone who has been working solidly for years and has not gone anywhere. The Honey Pop wrote how Nice to Each Other is a bit like David Bowie’s Modern Love wrapped in this soulful warmth:

Olivia Dean Is The New Classic

From the very first line, “Here we are, back again, fighting what’s in front of me,” Olivia captures that push and pull we’ve all felt. Wanting someone, but not wanting to lose yourself. The relationship she sings about lives in that in-between space. There’s so much vulnerability tucked into the humor. Yes, we’re referencing lyrics like “I’ll probably crash your stupid car.” And there’s a refreshing dose of realism when she sings, “I don’t want a boyfriend.” ‘Nice To Each Other’ isn’t your typical love song; it’s an invitation to let love be softer, freer, and more honest.

One Take Masterpiece

The single comes with a stunning one-take music video directed by Jake Erland, where Olivia meanders through an ever-shifting world that follows her lead. It’s light, stylish, and powerful. The video carries that easy vibe she sings about in the song, and feels so wonderfully Olivia Dean, we absolutely adore it!

Rewriting What Relationships Mean

One lyric we simply have to talk about is: “You know I’ve done all the classic stuff, and it never works, you know it.” This line feels like the heartbreak of the whole song, in our opinion. Olivia clearly isn’t interested in playing by the rulebook anymore. No grand declarations, no forced labels. Instead, she suggests a quieter kind of connection. It’s about showing up as you are and letting the small things like late-night talks, patience, and playfulness do the heavy lifting.

A New Era: The Art of Loving

‘Nice To Each Other’ kicks off The Art of Loving era, Olivia’s highly anticipated second album, dropping on September 26th. We couldn’t be more excited to see what she has in store! It’s hard to believe this is only her second full-length project. She’s already carved out a unique sound and secured her spot in the industry. The Art of Loving promises to be a tender, thoughtful dive into love in all its forms, and honestly, we already know we’re going to love it.

Olivia Dean’s ‘Nice To Each Other’ feels like a song made for right now, but it could belong to any era. In a world full of chaos, ghosting, and situationships, Olivia reminds us to do one simple thing: just be a little nicer to each other. That’s what makes it a classic we’ll keep coming back to”.

Three more standout singles before I round things off. In third place is an artist whose debut album, Undo the Blue, was my favourite album of 2023. It is my favourite album of the 2020s. A new single from an as-yet-untitled second album arrived in February. Running for your life has elements of songs from Undo the Blue, though it is a step in a new sonic direction. Tantalising and a potential glimpse into what a second L.P. could offer, I raved about the single when it came out. Rather than quote my own review of Running for your life, I will instead bring in the review below. Iraina Mancini has had a busy year. She has performed in the U.K. and abroad. Performed at some incredible festivals like Glastonbury and Green Man. She has supported The Coral at gigs. A brilliant recent gig on London Bridge. This is someone who works tirelessly and is building her fanbase. I would love to see more journalists and radio stations interview her and play he music more. I do not often spend so long spotlighting a single artist. However, when it comes to Iraina Mancini, the hype and love is real and justified:

Today is a really good day. Iraina Mancini is back with 'Running For Your Life', and if there was ever any doubt as to whether she could match that incredible run of singles from her first album, they've been blown clean out of the water by this phenomenal track. What kicks off as a dark and brooding number in her trademark retro Soho style, about the devil we all have whispering in our ear when things get too much, explodes into one of the most exhilarating, breakneck speed choruses I've heard in ages. A total rush from start to finish”.

A single from a recently Mercury-nominated album, Wolf Alice’s Just Two Girls is my second-favourite single of this year. Taken from The Clearing, even though I cannot find the single on Spotify, Wolf Alice released a video for this song last week. It co-stars Lucy Boynton. Some have recognised how The Clearing is a bit of a new sonic direction for Wolf Alice. Just Two Girls is a dreamy Pop song that sounds like something vintage. A track you could imagine coming out in the 1960s, maybe. A band perhaps known more for something harder and edgier, this is them simply bringing in new influence and sounds. Far Out Magazine provided their impassioned review of a song whose chorus is without doubt the best of the year. It is so indelible and gorgeous:

Songs about friendship are nothing new. Sure, in the rock and indie worlds, it never quite suits the prevailing angst that often cuts through, and Wolf Alice have provided plenty of that. But out of all of the experiences and emotions they’ve put to tape, there is something special and deeply poignant about the way Ellie Rowsell captures friendship, specifically, female friendship.

Maybe it’s purely a tenderness towards watching her, one of our time’s finest singers, carve out not just space but total domination among the male-dominated indie landscape. Escaping the landfill that so many of her initial peers fell into, Rowsell is on top, and from that podium, she’s singing about hanging with the girls. For the girls in the crowd, that’s always going to be something special.

But it’s more specific than that. In her lyricism, as the topic of friendship routinely comes up, Rowsell handles it with just as much, if not even more, love as she does romance. On ‘Don’t Delete The Kisses’, the band’s ultimate love song, she nervously ponders a crush, wondering if it’s right, contemplating her moves. But on ‘Just Two Girls’, the love Rowsell writes of that she feels for her friends is steadfast. It’s assured, it’s unquestioned, it’s as pure and powerful as any girl knows her relationship with her bestie to be.

“When I undress my every thought / The way that you can’t pay for / We’re just two girls at the bar / Like two kids in the park,” Rowsell sings as the central lyric. Two girls who are both the therapist and the fun, the song dips between those role, from sipping palomas at a bar to the depth of a morning-after hangover debrief. From beauty tips to a heavy chat, she sings so adoringly and admiringly of her friend, “I like the way she chain-smokes incessantly / Tiny epiphanies when she’s drinking with me.”

‘Bros’ exists in the same world and that’s why I love that song too. Dipping between silly memories of bad haircuts and bus routes, there is also so much depth to the love in that song. In fact, really, if any song is the band’s ultimate love song, it’s that one – written by Rowsell for her best friend Sadie, which she reminds the crowd of near enough each time she plays it.

Love songs for best friends. Love songs for girls to sing about their girl, capturing the utter adoration you feel when you’re sitting there having some drinks with someone you feel completely understood by, who you can switch at lightning speed from fun to hard feelings. That’s friendship, that’s girlhood, and Ellie Rowsell is a poet of that particular experience”.

The final single I am diving into is one I only heard a few weeks/a month or so ago. Sam Wills releases his new album, Speak, on 3rd October. A massive highlight from the album is Amelia. It is my favourite single from the year and one I have heard perhaps a hundred times. One that I can play ten times in a row without getting bored of it! I initially compared it to Scritti Politti in terms of the vocal and sound. However, it has a bit of Tame Impala to it. However, comparisons take away from the individuality and personality of the song. This is a tremendous single from the Hastings-born artist. As much as I love other singles from this year, Amelia strikes me harder and deeper than anything else. There is not much written about it. However, I did find this from Indie Shuffle:

I’ve started to notice a pattern with what I like to call “transitional songs”—tracks that bridge one season to the next while still holding onto the essence of the one before it. Summer carries a jubilant energy, while fall leans into a slower, winding-down mood. Sam Wills, a master of crafting atmospheres, taps into this phenomenon with his latest single, "Amelia."

The upbeat, infectious track follows a quest to win back a lost love. Wills cleverly invokes Amelia Earhart as a metaphor for searching across the world—or, in this case, being adrift on an emotional journey. It’s a smart blend of bright production and bittersweet storytelling”.

We still have a few months to go in terms of new albums and singles. There could be some that dethrone or rearrange my favourites. However, I wanted to publish this feature to celebrate the strength of music this year and some of the diverse and brilliant singles that have come out. You may have your own favourites or have a different take. However, the ten singles above have a very special place in my heart. In the time we have left until the year is through, it is exciting and intriguing to discover…

WHAT that could offer up.

FEATURE: Prime a Dozen: In Reaction to This Year’s Mercury Prize Shortlist

FEATURE:

 

 

Prime a Dozen

IN THIS PHOTO: Scottish artist Jacob Alon is shortlisted for the 2025 Mercury Prize for their debut album, In Limerence/PHOTO CREDIT: Garry Jones for The Line of Best Fit

 

In Reaction to This Year’s Mercury Prize Shortlist

__________

EVERY year…

IN THIS PHOTO: FKA twigs is one of the dozen shortlisted artists for her hugely acclaimed album, EUSEXUA/PHOTO CREDIT: Jordan Hemingway

produces some surprises when it comes to the Mercury Prize. Taking place on 16th October at the Utilita Arena, Newcastle; this is the first time the Mercury Prize is taken out of London. It is a positive sign for a ceremony that is often seen as London-centric. Over the past ten or so ceremonies, I think the award has only gone to artists based or born outside of London once. That was last year with English Teacher for This Could Be Texas. Hailing from Leeds and Lancashire, it was a long overdue move from the capital. Now that the Mercury Prize has a new home in Newcastle, it is giving focus to a part of the country underrepresented in terms of winners and shortlisted artists. Sam Fender is one of a dozen artists on this year’s Mercury shortlist. He was born in South Shields (which is close to Newcastle). I will come to a feature from The Guardian and their take, before I provide mine. Only a dozen albums can be shortlisted, so there are always some omissions. I was convinced Lambrini Girls (Phoebe Lunny and Selin Macieira-Boşgelmez) would make it for their mesmeric debut album, Who Let the Dogs Out? Maybe too Self Esteem (A Complicated Woman), Billie Marten (Dog Eared) and Nova Twins (Parasites & Butterflies) would be included, I thought. Lambrini Girls are a great new act that should have made the cut, in a year where newcomers and rising artists are in very short supply. Service Station at the End of the Universe by Antony Szmierek is another debut that I feel is worth of shortlisting. I think we can also dispel the narrative that every year the Mercury Prize includes an ‘out there’ or ‘niche’ artist just to be different. Sure, mainly Pop, Rock and Alternative has won the award before. R&B and genres that are more commonly discussed and played. You always get a Jazz or Electronic artist that is seen as an also-ran and there to make up the numbers. When the Jazz quintet Ezra Collective won in 2023 for Where I'm Meant to Be, that was a first. This year’s shortlist includes Emma-Jean Thackray. Her album, Weirdo, is nominated. She is a phenomenal Jazz artist, though limiting her to one genre seems misrepresentative.

IN THIS PHOTO: Martin Carthy (who is nominated for Transform Me Then Into a Fish) at the Mercury Prize Shortlist event

In terms of takeaways from this year’s dozen, there are some steps forward - and some back. Two Irish artists, CMAT and Fontaines D.C., are in the running. Ireland is traditionally under-represented and awarded, and it may be the case that the former artist wins for her hugely acclaimed new album, EURO-COUNTRY. She is my tip. Artists outside of London, whilst in the minority, are a strong showing. From Sam Fender and Pulp from the North to Welsh Jazz pianist Joe Webb, there is more of a spread than some previous years. In terms of age, eighty-four-year-old Martin Carthy is the oldest shortlisted artist. Wolf Alice are back on the shortlist after they won the 2018 Mercury Prize for Visions of a Life. In terms of the new, I guess there is not a lot of choice. Jacob Alon is nominated for their debut album, In Limerence. They are an incredible artist and 2025 has been a huge year for them. Alon has gone from this relatively unknown artist to someone being spoken about in the highest terms. Hailing from Dunfermline, this is an important nomination for a Scottish artist. Again, making sure the awards do not remain with London artist is important…so it is great that Sam Fender, Jacob Alon, CMAT, Pulp and Fontaines D.C. are among the favourites; who were born/based outside of the capital. Previous years have seen some unusual choices and albums that are included maybe to appeal to certain labels/radio stations/demographics. Some mainstream Pop from huge artists that was a slightly odd selection. Nothing like that this year. Whilst some might feel that Pulp could have made way for a new band like Lambrini Girls, it goes to show that the Mercury Prize is a broad church and not exclusive to either young and upcoming artist or the established. It is nice when newer artists win and can use that platform and prize money to further their career, though it is judged on merit and, without doubt. Pulp’s More is among the best albums of the past year.

I shall continue in a minute. However, there has been reaction to the shortlist. Announced this morning on Lauren Laverne’s BBC Radio 6 Music show, she spoke to nominees like Emma-Jean Thackray and Jacob Alon. It is exciting writing about the shortlist and picking our favourites. I shall keep my powder dry until the very end (though I have shown love and leaning for CMAT!), but, in terms of progression, representation and taking a leap forward, my heart says that Jacob Alon or Emma-Jean Thackray should win. However, as it is so unpredictable, you can never be sure of safe! In terms of gender, women are in the minority this year. There are four female artists nominated (Emma-Jean Thackray, FKA twigs, CMAT and PinkPantheress). There is the female-led Wolf Alice, six male artists/male-fronted or heavy bands (Fontaines D.C., Pulp, Sam Fender, Joe Webb, Pa Salieu and Martin Carthy) a and one non-binary artist (Jacob Alon). In terms of newcomers or newer acts, Jacob Alon and Joe Webb. A lack of new bands appearing on the Mercury shortlist is quite concerning. However, there is such an eclectic and strong mix for this year. This is what The Guardian noted:

CMAT, Pulp and PinkPantheress among Mercury prize shortlist light on new names

Only two debut albums – including the ‘token’ jazz release – feature among this year’s list of nominations for the coveted UK and Irish music prize

A raft of familiar names fill this year’s list of Mercury prize nominations, with only two debuts among the 12 shortlisted albums. In Limerence, the first full-length by the Scottish folk songwriter Jacob Alon, and Hamstrings and Hurricanes, the first by Welsh jazz musician Joe Webb, will compete with the likes of Pulp’s comeback album More, folk godfather Martin Carthy’s Transform Me Then Into a Fish and the album with the UK’s biggest opening week of the year so far, People Watching by Sam Fender.

The list is split 50/50 between male and female or mixed acts. The solo female artists on the list tend to the iconoclastic: Irish pop star CMAT’s acclaimed third album Euro-Country, Leeds jazz musician Emma-Jean Thackray’s Weirdo, FKA twigs’ Eusexua and PinkPantheress’s mixtape Fancy That. As for bands, as well as Pulp, the Irish band Fontaines DC (Romance) and London four-piece Wolf Alice (The Clearing) appear.

There is just one rap album on the list, Afrikan Alien by Pa Salieu. As ever, the Mercury seems unafraid of its reputation for nominating just one “token” jazz album, in Webb’s Hamstrings and Hurricanes. Metal, as usual, does not feature.

Dr Jo Twist, CEO of the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), the body behind the awards, told the Guardian that she was delighted by the breadth of albums nominated. “It’s a real celebration of such an eclectic mix of achievements across all kinds of genres, and it’s been a really competitive year.”

There are several repeat nominations: CMAT was previously recognised for her second album, 2023’s Crazymad, for Me; FKA twigs for her 2014 debut LP1; Fontaines DC for their 2019 debut Dogrel; Sam Fender for his second album, 2021’s Seventeen Going Under.

Both Wolf Alice and Pulp have three prior nominations and one win apiece under their respective belts: Pulp were nominated for 1994’s His ’n’ Hers (controversially losing to M People), won in 1996 for Different Class, and were nominated again in 1998 for This Is Hardcore. Wolf Alice were nominated for their 2015 debut My Love Is Cool, won in 2018 for Visions of a Life, and were nominated again in 2021 for Blue Weekend. They are now four-time nominees, only bested by Radiohead and Arctic Monkeys, with five apiece”.

I did think that Sam Fender would be included, though I think that the frontrunners and favourites will be CMAT, Fontaines D.C. and Wolf Alice. I think Pulp are less likely to win, though their nomination is very well deserved. Whilst we would love to see a Jazz artist win for the second time in three years, I have a feeling that judges might go more conventional. That sounds insulting but, even though Jazz is not outsider or ‘token’, I am not sure history will repeat itself so soon. FKA twigs is exceptional and one of our best artists. Pa Salieu is incredible and worthy. PinkPantheress a hugely talented voice. Jacob Alon seems like the artist that the heart roots for whilst the brain or bones go for, say, CMAT or Fontaines D.C. I would love to see the award go to an Irish artist, as that is a rarity. CMAT and Fontaines D.C. both passionately regarded and exceptional. The dozen shortlisted albums are prime and phenomenal:

CMAT – EURO-COUNTRY

Emma-Jean Thackray – Weirdo

FKA twigs – EUSEXUA

Fontaines D.C. – Romance

Jacob Alon – In Limerence

Joe Webb – Hamstrings and Hurricanes

Martin Carthy – Transform Me Then Into a Fish

Pa Salieu – Afrikan Alien

PinkPantheress – Fancy That

Pulp – More

Sam Fender – People Watching

Wolf Alice – The Clearing”

In terms of progress, a non-binary artist on the shortlist is hugely positive. Jacob Alon is a raw talent with years ahead of them. It would have been nice to see women in the majority, though there are legends and older artists sitting with younger artists. Not many debut albums or newer artists is a step back. Rock and Alternative is very much in the mix and in with a great shout. Sam Fender and Fontaines D.C. are among my favourites. The Mercury Prize has always been broad and all-inclusive, though some years have seen certain genres side-lined or seen as tokenistic. That is no longer true. More integrated and united, there is a wonderful music palette in the dozen shortlisted albums. One could say, in terms of L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ representation, it is not that great. Nodding to Black and Asian artists. Is it as diverse and all-inclusive as it could be?! I think there is a pretty good balance. The shortlist neither overly panders or excludes. There are no inclusions that are politically motivated or cynical. Every artist has released a stunning album that deserves the award. The lack of fresh faces does call into question whether the Mercury Prize learned anything from English Teacher winning last year for This Could Be Texas. I hope that the 2026 shortlist redresses this, as the prize should be about including rising and debut-album artists alongside those more established. Lest it be elitist or inaccessible! With live performances and a new home, it is a good sign. Fresh starts and evolution. Lauren Laverne hosting. Twelve wonderful albums in contention. Will CMAT steal the show or will Jacob Alon take the prize? Can favourites Pulp and Wolf Alice overcome newer artists like Pa Salieu and Joe Webb? Will it be FKA twigs’ night or will Sam Fender win? He was born in South Shields, which is a very short distance from where the Mercury Prize has been relocated to. A local win would be amazing. Impossible to call but always fascinating, we will see who walks away with the coveted Mercury Prize…

IN Newcastle in October.

FEATURE: Perimenopop: Why the Young and New Are Not the Most Exciting and Essential Queens of the Genre

FEATURE:

 

 

Perimenopop

IN THIS PHOTO: Sophie Ellis-Bextor

 

Why the Young and New Are Not the Most Exciting and Essential Queens of the Genre

__________

THAT is not to say that…

IN THIS PHOTO: Tate McRae

the artists I am going to mention are not young. It is to say that, as has been the case for decades, those that get the most attention in Pop are the young. The very young. It is still very much a genre where the mass attention goes to the mainstream’s youngest. Perhaps things have broadened and improved a bit. You can look at the most celebrated and hyped Pop artists of today and many of the women mentioned are in their thirties. That is not necessarily super-young, though they can still be considered young. In the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, there was this hype of women who were in their teens and twenties. A feeling that, if you were in your thirties or older, then you were less relevant. Although there is still ageism in music and some stations rarely play artists over a certain age, it is clear that one cannot necessarily link the best and most essential Pop with youth. I am focusing on women in Pop here, as they are subjected to ageism more blatantly and, in my mind, are dominating the genre. Today, whilst the most popular artists are perhaps in their late-twenties and thirties, there is still a majority of the spotlight put on those who are younger. These new and rising artists. Unconsciously or not, younger women are seen as more vital and worthy when it comes to Pop music. That is not a new revelation and realisation. I don’t think we have progressed as much as we should have. Look at women in Pop who started out very young and are still going today. Artists like Kylie Minogue producing her best music and delivering her most memorable tours in her fifties. It is the experience they have gained being in the industry for years that I think makes their music richer and their performances more assured and dynamic. The stagecraft and command is a result of the years and decades they have been playing.

However, clearly, some truly exceptional live sets are coming from younger women in Pop. However, think about modern Pop and its health. Women in Pop not necessarily dominating the charts. There is this assumption that Pop has lost its fun and is not what it used to be. I would disagree. I think Pop has become more interesting the past five years or so. Artists like Charli xcx and Chappell Roan adding to that. Maybe CMAT could not be defined as a (purely) Pop artist, though she is among a wave of women in music who add wit, spice, energy and fun into music. In addition to revelation, vulnerability and honesty. Melody in Pop is less common or has been in decline. Some saying that Pop is all but dead and the fate of it rests with The Last Dinner Party. There is always going to be that debate as to whether Pop is declining and as good as it used to be. I think that it is in great shape. So many interesting and promising artists coming through. However, I do feel like there is the assumption that age and youth equates to the best Pop music. That women in Pop of a certain age are less exciting and have lost that spark. That is definitely not the case. Legends of the genre like Louise are still producing music as essential and interesting as their earliest work. What I am finding is that so many major Pop artists of today are releasing music that is quite forgettable or formulaic. Maybe their experiences and perspectives are either too familiar and over-discussed or else there is that lack of melody, killer chorus or anything with genuine invention. Sabrina Carpenter is an artist I respect, though there is little to distinguish her from other artists. Her new album, Man’s Best Friend, might not linger as long in the mind as it should.

She is not the only one. I think that the most interesting and impactful music made by young women is in other genres. R&B and Rap especially fertile and exciting right now. Although there are clearly a lot of brilliant and inventive young women in Pop, I wonder if we should be paying more attention to a different generation. I am going to end with an artist who I think makes a huge argument as to why you cannot define the best and most relevant Pop sound with youth. Pop pioneers and icons who have been making music for decades, I feel, have a lot to say. They should not be relegated to a certain radio station have to stand aside whilst the industry focuses on the very young. There is still ageism in music. Especially against women. Lady Gaga spoke about this earlier in the year. Just getting warmed up and hitting her stride, this might also be the case for one of Pop music’s queens. Sophie Ellis-Bextor is someone I spoke about recently when I marked twenty-five years of Groovejet (If This Ain’t Love) by Spiller. Ellis-Bextor co-wrote and sang on that track. Her new album, Perimenopop, is among the best of the year. A phenomenal album that confidently shows why you cannot exclude or marginalise women in their thirties, forties and fifties. In her mid-forties, Sophie Ellis-Bextor is in an age range that is defined by restriction. Maybe played on stations like BBC Radio 2 and not considered appropriate for ‘younger’ stations. Women in their forties not seen as cool or as important as their younger peers. Sophie Elli-Bextor’s new album is perhaps her best. I think that it is so memorable and phenomenal because of her experience and intuition. Someone who has been in the industry for decades, she brings everything that came before into Perimenopop. There are not as many interviews with Sophie Ellis-Bextor as there should be this year. Maybe indicative of the media and how, still, age is linked with importance and relevance. That the freshest, best and coolest Pop is from those in their teens, twenties or thirties. There are a couple of interview archives I want to bring in. The first is from The Bristol Magazine:

I wrote Perimenopop when I was in the absolute momentum and head rush of everything that happened with Murder on the Dancefloor last year [which appeared in key scene of the aforementioned smash-hit movie Saltburn]. That is actually a really glorious way to make pop music, because pop music thrives on momentum. It’s something that needs that rush of vitality in its veins. So it was the perfect time.
“I was already going to make a pop dance album anyway, but having all of this rocket fuel with Murder on Dancefloor returning to the charts and taking me all around the world with it again just injected this real fizz into the project – and also into the people I was lucky enough to get in the room with. I’ve worked with some incredible people, artists, producers and writers on Perimenopop. I just wrote a wish list and managed to get in the room with most of them. Happy days – and lucky me. I took full advantage, quite frankly, and this album is joyful, it’s celebratory, it’s inclusive, and it’s also about how lovely is to have all of those feelings
”.

Before moving on, I am keen to include this extract from a recent Billboard interview that answer a few questions and tackles some stereotypes. Amazing to read Sophie Ellis-Bextor’s words. How she feels at her happiest and most content. That reflects in her music:

I have to say, Perimenopop — album title of the year. How did you come up with it?

For me and all my girlfriends in our mid-40s, there’s a bit of a narrative about some aspects that might sound a bit gloomy. And I just wanted something that would flip the script on it a little bit — and also invite into the room the fact that I’m not the way I was when I was 20. I think it’s also quite a good indicator of how much more ballsy I’ve gotten as I’ve gotten older. But how lucky am I that I’ve been able to have a career long enough to feel that comfortable?

Are you liking what you’re seeing from the rest of the U.K. pop world these days?

What happened with Charli xcx and brat is ­obviously so brilliant. But also what I love about it is it really lets the mask fall. And I think teenage me would have completely resonated with that. We talked about a Brat Summer, and I think in my head I was like, “Well, maybe Perimenopop is your autumn?”.

What Sophie Ellis-Bextor said about feeling ballsy. That determination, courage and strength that you get as an older woman. It lends something to music that is not necessarily easily ands readily possessed by younger women. Also, as she said, it is quite fortunate to have a career after a certain number of years. It is so completive and cutthroat, so many do not have the luxury of releasing albums decades since their debut. I still think it is needlessly tough for women. How they need to prove themselves in a way men do not. I do find that, in terms of emotional and sonic range, Pop artists like Sophie Ellis-Bextor have that experience and gift that takes years to come. Life experiences and a full catalogue that means, decades later, she can pull in all of that and release an album that is marries so many styles, emotions and layers. So much modern Pop music is aimed at TikTok and it can be very samey. Artists that are not necessarily aiming for that market, I feel, are releasing the most interesting and listenable Pop. Music that lasts longer and has genuine depth. This is what The Line of Best Fit in their rave review of Perimenopop:

From lesser known singles, to deep cuts, b-sides and more, the British siren has proven that the pop genre can (and should) move about in various sound spheres. Which brings us to where she last left off: HANA (花) (2023). Her seventh release capped off her trilogy of progressive adult alternative recordings helmed by the renowned Ed Harcourt; it courted positive notices and respectable sales tallies. Contrary to the aforementioned “Saltburn effect” (and ensuing mania) with her signature tune "Murder on the Dancefloor", Ellis-Bextor had been mulling over a more straight ahead affair for the follow-up to HANA (花).

Not dissimilar to her antipodean foremother Kylie Minogue’s post-Golden (2018) chess move with DISCO (2020), Ellis-Bextor is seeking to reclaim and refine the U.K. dance scene of the 2000s she helped shape with Perimenopop. Originally the set was denominated as The Invisible Line, she ultimately chose this, a portmanteau title for her eighth collection that pithily plays on "perimenopause" – a medical term for when women in their late 30s through to their early 40s transition between reproductivity and menopause – as a comment on the ageism-sexism women endure in the music industry. It is a signal from Ellis-Bextor that growing older won’t find women any less vital, artistically or otherwise. The content of Perimenopop – twelve tracks total – reflect this declarative/celebratory gesture. What’s more? Ellis-Bextor's pen leads on every cut.

The writer-artist-musician-producer talents onboarded demonstrate Ellis-Bextor’s commitment to her vocation in how she balances both compositional substance and hooks aplenty in her songcraft: Hannah Robinson, MNEK, Selena Gomez, Finn Keane, Sam "Karma Kid" Knowles, Shura, Duck Blackwell, Thomas "Kid Harpoon" Hull, Richard "Biff" Stannard, Nile Rodgers (of Chic fame), Janée "Jin Jin" Bennett, Luke Fitton, Caroline Ailin, James Greenwood, Jon Shave, Baz Kaye, Julia Michaels and the cited Ed Harcourt make up Ellis-Bextor’s diverse collaborative court on this outing.

Studied Ellis-Bextor fans will thrill knowing that she hasn’t lost her way kicking off a long player with a bang as "Relentless Love" evinces. The throwback floorfiller – think prime era Taste of Honey or Baccara – packs a punch with its vivid string charts, coruscating programming and sylph-like beat; genres aside, it sits comfortably alongside prior notable album starters such as "Making Music", "Revolution", and "Birth of an Empire".

Switching from old and new school modalities gives Ellis-Bextor room on the production front to rope in various elements from song to song. As such, Perimenopop is always an engaging listen.

Post-"Relentless Love", flashes of disco-pop – in classic-to-contemporary tones – pulse on "Vertigo", "Taste", "Stay On Me", and "Dolche Vita". The uptempo rush of those first five tracks will bring immediate comparisons to her last four-on-the-floor affair Make a Scene (2011), except everything contained on this body of work feels that much richer and more sumptuous. Additional entries on Perimenopop like "Glamorous", "Freedom of the Night", "Layers", and "Diamond in the Dark" keep with this glacial nightlife persuasion.

As with any Ellis-Bextor exercise, Perimenopop contains the hallmark pop eclecticism her discography is known for. On the record’s back-end are "Time", "Heart Sings" and "Don’t Know What You’ve Got ‘Til It’s Gone". This triptych winningly utilizes a cooler synth-pop palette. "Heart Sings" and "Don’t Know What You’ve Got ‘Til It’s Gone" are quite the pair; they close Perimenopop with a gorgeous emotional nuance in their respective lyrical scripts and performances. Drawing down on the latter aspect, Ellis-Bextor reveals her hand at how effectively she handles vulnerable stock with her vocal instrument.

Perimenopop doesn’t disguise that the mirrorball is the muse here, but don’t mistake this as some retreat into dance music indulgence. Instead, as stated previously, reclamation and refinement sit at the heart of Perimenopop with a few other sonic surprises tucked in. This should be expected. Ellis-Bextor's decorated back catalog has always split a complementary difference between a good groove and inventive intrigue. Even when she turns the dial ever so slightly in one direction, Perimenopop is no exception. Turn it up and enjoy”.

Although the media and music industry is not going to change its tune or reverse its policies when it comes to women in Pop and who they deem to be worthy and relevant, I do think that a lot of the best and enduring Pop music is not being made by artists starting out or the very young. There are some exceptions though, to me, there is a blandness and homogenisation happening. So many artists repeating what is popular and not adding anything new. Embrace and listen to the enduing queens of Pop and that is where you are going to find the kind of Pop sound that should be played more. It should be talked about more. But it isn’t necessarily. I hope that attitudes do change because, as Lady Gaga said, and something that can be applied to so many women in Pop who experience ageism or restrictions, they are very much…

JUST getting started.

FEATURE: Modern-Day Queens: Nova Twins

FEATURE:

 

 

Modern-Day Queens

 

Nova Twins

__________

CURRENTLY on…

tour, and with a new album, Parasites & Butterflies, out, it is a very big time for Nova Twins. I will end with a review of the exceptional third studio album. The London duo of Amy Love and Georgia South are among the most important artists around. I know I use the word ‘important’ when describing artists, though I think it is apt. In the case of Nova Twins, there is no doubt that the music they are putting out is of the highest importance. In terms of the messages in the lyrics. An openness and introspection that might not have been obviously present during their first two albums. A broader but no less urgent and stunning palette, the musicianship on Parasites & Butterflies is also a notch up from their previous work. A duo always improving and adding to their brilliance, I will start out with a few recent interviews with Nova Twins. I will lead with an interview I have sourced before. Back in March, The Guardian chatted with Nova Twins. They talked about silencing the doubters of Heavy Metal. In a scene and genre that is still defined by white men, two Black women coming into this arena have to fight twice as hard. With high-profile fans including Elton John and Tom Morello, they do not have to prove themselves to anyone – though they have to face misogynoir and sexism:

The Twins – not actual twins, but rather old, perfectly matched friends (what did they do on those long van rides? “Honestly we just yapped the whole time”) first met in their teens, when Love dated South’s brother: she became part of the family – the two girls even shared a bedroom – and eventually they started making music together. An early iteration of the group was named BRAAT way before the lime-green album was even a twinkle in Charli xcx’s eye, and their first song tumbled out of them amid giggles on the sofa. “Bad Bitches” – “It was just bass and vocals,” South recalls, “and we were like, oooh this is cool …” But this time, nothing was tumbling out of anywhere.

Slowly, as they decompressed from the tour and started engaging with “real life”again, reconnecting with friends and spending time enjoying London, themes and ideas started coming up. Third album Parasites & Butterflies is alive with that feeling of separate existences: it pings from serpentine hellfire (Glory) to kick-you-in-the-face rawk (Monster) to Beastie Boys-esque chanting (N.O.V.A) and potent balladry (Hummingbird).

On Supernova, they felt they had to be basically superheroes, relentless with manic positivity and power; the album has a hint of dread. “There’s a kind of dark undertone – which is reflective of where we were at the time – but in a good way,” Love says. “It’s open. Honest. Because we’re not all happy and super-strong 100% of the time.”

The Twins made a conscious decision not to use any synths on the album – all the sounds are made using guitars (Love) and bass (South) with vast boards of effects pedals to manipulate their output. “We’ve always pushed ourselves to do things really manually live,” South says. “And I think being women in music … people don’t question men. So they can have everything on the track and they can still be ‘the greatest’ – people won’t question if they’re playing live, they won’t question if they wrote their riffs, or if they’re miming, or anything. Because we were women going into it – and Black women – we were like: we need to play everything, do everything.”

It might have started as a reaction to the misogynoir that dogs heavy rock genres but it turned out to be an integral part of a Nova Twins show, with South in particular marshalling two vast planks of pedals at her feet, stomping on them periodically to take her bass from a muscular strut to a thundering dubstep fuzz.

Growing up in Essex and south London respectively, Love and South dealt with varying degrees of racism (Love is of Iranian and Nigerian descent, and South is of Jamaican and Australian). When they were playing endless toilet venues and open mic nights around the capital, they soon felt like outsiders in the notoriously white, male world of heavy music. “We couldn’t really see where we fit in,” Love says. “We’re like the only women on the bill, definitely the only Black people on the bill, or were at the time when we first started. And it would be like, well, we don’t quite belong here but the audience are really receptive to us. And then we’d be like, we didn’t really fit in the R&B hip-hop world, either”.

I am going to move to an interview from Punknews.com. They herald Parasites & Butterflies and how it “is a testament to the incredible strength of vulnerability and the indomitable spirit of Georgia South and Amy Love”. There is no denying the fact that we should embrace and celebrate Nova Twins. If you are not aware of them yet then I would definitely recommend that you check them out:

You recorded Parasites and Butterflies with Rich Costey in Vermont. What went into your decision to record here?

Georgia: I think fate kind of put us all together with schedules and everything aligning. It was quite sudden that the opportunity came up to work with Rich. Obviously, we jumped at it and flew to America and did it with him in Vermont. [laughs] It was a really great experience. We were kinda in the middle of the woods for about four weeks, and we had the Foo Fighters tour in the middle of it and a few festivals. It was a crazy trip.

How did the environment impact the recording?

Amy: It was quite a juxtaposition from our rooms in winter, where we started writing the album. By the time we went to Vermont to record it everything was welcomed, like the scenery because it’s so green there. It was in the middle of the woods. It was a winter going into spring kind of thing and it was really beautiful and exactly what we needed; the calm, the peace. We had a studio dog, she was the engineer’s dog and it was just lovely. It was just what we needed.

Growth is a huge theme on the album. How do you feel you’ve grown as people and as musicians during your time working on the album?

Amy: With the theme, we like to say it is the bridge between chaos and beauty and just addressing all sides of the spectrum. We’ve always been known to be like Supernova, superhuman, superpowered, and we are definitely still those girls, but also, we are all human at the end of the day. It’s very important to share both sides of the coin and to make sure that people understand that there is power in being vulnerable as well. You don’t always have to be this front-facing titan; you can be vulnerable and honest with your emotions and still be just as powerful by sharing that. That went into the album a lot.

I think we say each year that it doesn’t ever stay the same. We naturally just evolve. We naturally grow. We definitely got more into the production on our side. We enjoyed that part of the growth. We’ve learned a lot, and to look back and see what we can do ourselves is really great.

What helps you look after your mental health on tour?

Georgia: We’ve started journaling, which is really fun. We started in January and we both got these cute little diaries. We write in there every night and that really helps. Just to have more of a routine of something you can do every day that grounds you again when everything is so different and crazy every day. You can come back to this journal. [laughs]

I think being more open in terms of if your social battery is feeling drained or if you feel a bit off, just communicating it. It’s fine to have to go for a walk by yourself and just chill. And trying to get as much sleep as we can because last tour was hardcore, we wouldn’t sleep for days and try to fit in as many shows as we could from LA to Bristol to Glasgow to God-knows-where. [laughs] It was crazy. We’re just trying to be more mindful with that. We’ve got a really amazing team that we travel with who also help keep morale high. We’re a really good unit.

Which part of Parasites and Butterflies are you proudest of?

Amy: It’s really hard. I feel like generally, the album as a whole. The songs are all very different from each other as well. You’ve got all these different concepts and energies. I think when we look back at the album, that’s the story. That’s the final thing. Like I said earlier, I was really excited to put “Black Roses” in the set but then it changes, it depends what mood you’re in. Now I’m in a “Fuck it!” chaotic mood.

[laughter]

Amy: I need to bring out “Parallel”! It just depends. For me, I would say I'm proud of the album as a whole.

Georgia: I would say the same, like as a whole body of work. It takes a lot to put a whole album together. You don’t see all behind the scenes; it’s not just writing it, it’s recording it, mixing it, then mastering it, and ordering it. It takes a long time. I think we’re proud of being proud of the work. [laughs]”.

DORK spoke with Nova Twins recently. They opened by stating how there is a lot of pressure on the second album from an artist. How it is ‘difficult’ and a big test. However, a third album is perhaps more relevant. In the sense that it proves that the artist has grown and has longevity. That album that really matters. No pressure on Parasites & Butterflies, but Nova Twins have definitely shown that they are here for the long-run! Although there are festivals and line-ups featuring Nu-Metal or Heavy Metal acts that are largely white and male, that is not the case everywhere. Nova Twins are hard to pigeonhole as they are the result of all of their influences. Neither straight-up Rock/Metal or Pop and R&B:

Nova Twins have never been afraid to wear their hearts on their sleeves, and that honesty remains front and centre. Tracks like ‘Piranha’ hum with tension and expectation, while ‘Parallel Universe’ explores the disconnection of a society glued to DMs and dating apps. ‘N.O.V.A’ is a call to arms for self-belief, while ‘Drip’ feels like it’s delivered with a sly grin – the sound of a band comfortably claiming their space in the spotlight.

There’s no grand plan – just raw emotion. “The album was definitely very healing for us,” Georgia says. “It’s very honest. Whatever we wrote that day was rooted in where we were at that moment. We didn’t pre-plan it. If we needed a pick-me-up, we wrote ‘N.O.V.A’ or ‘Soprano’. We didn’t force anything.”

Sonically, things were equally fluid, though this time they wrote with the live show in mind. Having conquered massive rooms filled with crowds ready to mosh at the drop of a bassline, they channelled that energy into an album that builds up, breaks down, and refuses to stay in one genre for more than a moment.

“Now we know how things sound through a fat PA or massive stage speakers, or how the crowd will feel when it breaks down and kicks off,” Georgia grins. “It’s inspired by big moments in big arenas, so we definitely added more of that in!”

They might be working with heavyweight producers like Richard Costley now, but the heart of Nova Twins remains unchanged. From their first release as BRAATS back in 2014 to the behemoth they are today, the band still runs on the same fuel: the fierce bond between Amy and Georgia.

“We’re very lucky that we’re a duo,” Georgia says. “We balance each other out, which is the foundation we can build from. It makes us feel really empowered that it’s just us two. It keeps us inspired, and hopefully it can inspire other women and girls to write music, get on stages, to produce albums.”

Their place at the top of the nu-metal ladder isn’t just a personal win – it signals a bigger shift. Gone are the tired old tropes. In their place, new voices, new perspectives, and a scene more diverse than ever. Just ask anyone who saw their recent set at Vans Warped Tour.

“That was great,” Amy recalls. “We played quite early, I think it was lunchtime, but we still had such an amazing crowd that were really up for it. American crowds always seem to have that spark. They just get it. I think they’re used to those showbiz-heavy bands, so we feel really at home in that scene.”

“It was great to see so much diversity in the line-up and in the crowd,” Georgia adds. “It’s amazing how far it’s come even since we first started. We would turn up to festivals and we’d be the only Black people there – sometimes we’d be the only women there – so it’s definitely encouraging to see that progression”.

I will end with a review from Metal Hammer. On an album that ranks alongside the best of this year, Nova Twins have released something that is both chaotic and beautiful. There is darkness and weight on the album. However, there is also plenty of uplift and energy. These contrasts make Parasites & Butterflies so enthralling and nuanced. An arresting and compelling album that you will keep coming back to:

Chaos and beauty – those are words Amy Love and Georgia South have repeated like a mantra around the release of the third Nova Twins album, Parasites & Butterflies. By their own admission, it’s a record that was born out of darkness, for even amid the crashing lows that inevitably accompany the highs of success, deadlines wait for no one.

The album is a response to the intense pressure that follows the whirlwind of early success, with a focus on the impact on the girls’ mental health that sees them wearing their hearts on their sleeves.

From the frenetic, shimmering Glory all the way to the darkly sweet Black Roses, the emotional arc of their storytelling is more immediately apparent this time around. It starts out in a vulnerable place and builds in confidence that at times turns to rage.

Which is not to say it’s all doom and gloom: Parasites & Butterflies is energised and exciting. Amy’s incandescent voice is more versatile than ever and she flexes her full range with all its colour, light and shade, from her lightning-fast verses on the cheeky, sensual Drip to the beautifully controlled performance of Hummingbird, an almost-ballad about grief.

What hasn’t changed is their talent for making immense, danceable songs that transcend genre. They never make the obvious choice: confessional anthem Monsters incorporates drum’n’bass and industrial elements, but with a big, soaring chorus.

Georgia can make just about any conceivable sound with just her bass and pedals, creating a deliciously heavy wub-wub-wub sound that you can feel in your stomach. N.O.V.A has the flavour of a 90s rock/ hip hop crossover, with its RATM-esque guitar riff and addictive chant chorus. At this point, their punk swagger seems to have returned; by Hurricane, they’re resolute, spitting ‘Keep the pressure on, ’cause we ain’t going nowhere.’

Parasites & Butterflies’ conception may have been fraught, but Nova Twins have made something beautiful out of the chaos”.

Let’s leave things there. I have been a fan of Nova Twins for a while, though I feel like this is a particularly huge moment for them. The release of their third studio album. Big tour dates. Amy Love and Georgia South are an incredible partnership that is defined by this close and deep connection. The music Nova Twins makes is among the best in the world. They are no doubt inspiring so many people. Helping to change the conversation around gender and racial bias in genres like Metal. Helping to break down barriers. If they are not there already, then do make sure that you add Nova Twins…

TO your playlist.

___________

Follow Nova Twins

FEATURE: Superdeluxe: Are Reissues, Special Editions and Various Vinyl Versions a Good Thing?

FEATURE:

 

 

Superdeluxe

IN THIS PHOTO: Baby, That’s Show Business Edition (Lakeside Beach Blue Sparkle Vinyl) is one of at least six unique vinyl variations of her upcoming album, The Life of a Showgirl

 

Are Reissues, Special Editions and Various Vinyl Versions a Good Thing?

__________

MAYBE it used to happen…

IN THIS PHOTO: Dua Lipa

decades ago but, more noticeable now than then, artists releasing new albums will often quickly follow it up with special or expanded editions. The studio album will come out and then there will be another release with a couple of extra tracks. Maybe some remixes. You do wonder whether they could have just included that on the original album. Whether there is a point or putting out the same album with a couple of additional tracks. It is a bit of a difficult balance. In some cases, an artist might release a second version of a studio album with modifications. I will come to Taylor Swift soon. The Taylor’s Version of some of her studio albums. Taking control back from a major label and how they treated her. Getting the rights to her music back. However, she is someone who released multiple versions of the vinyl album and it seems like exploiting fans. However, there are cases when there are positive reissues and new editions. Maybe there was this feeling that Dua Lipa’s Radical Optimism had to be quite short or commercial. The psychedelic Radical Optimism (Extended) version adds something to the original. As CLASH explored, it does seem like a different album. Maybe one that improves on the original:

When Dua Lipa shared her new album ‘Radical Optimism’ earlier this year it sparked celebration from fans, but also confusion in some quarters. The pre-release narrative held that this would be a psychedelic statement, co-piloted by Tame Impala guru Kevin Parker. The final record, however, was a slick, finessed pop record – somewhat different from the expectations we’d been fed.

Released overnight, the extended version of ‘Radical Optimism’ feels like the weighty psychedelic mission we’d been expecting. A solid hour of funky bass lines, ridiculous synths, and lysergic textures, it blends the pop suss Dua has long since made her own with markedly different landscapes.

It dials into the statements the Kosovo-born, UK-raised artists made to the press a few months back. “No one’s really making Britpop at the moment,” she told the Face in February, “but I have a feeling 2024 is gonna be the year.”

The multi award-winning star added that she was “looking through the music history of psychedelia, trip-hop and Britpop…”

These words frame the Extended edition much more effectively than the standard edition, the No. 1 smash that was delivered earlier this year. It’s a reminder that disco was – in effect – a truly psychedelic form of music, and that Dua Lipa has always had a multitude of threads on her studio locker”.

In the case of Kylie Minogue’s Tension II in 2024, which followed 2023’s TENSION, this was a sequel to that album. Maybe a companion piece. If this kind of album feels like a whole new work, then it is okay. I am not a fan of when artists put out an album and then there is the rush to put it back out with tiny additions. Charli xcx’s BRAT was followed by Brat and it’s the same but there’s three more songs so it’s not and then later last year, she released Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat. A star-studded remix album, whilst this was Charli xcx building a universe and empire, I am a bit split as to whether it is a benefit to fans and their dedication or it is just repackaging an album or cashing in. Last month, we learned about the various variants of Taylor Swift’s upcoming The Life of as Showgirl album. VARIETY explained more:

The Life of a Showgirl” looks like it’s going to have nine lives and then some, when it comes to variant editions with different album cover images and vinyl color schemes. Only Taylor Swift and her team know how many different versions of the album will go up for pre-sale before all the variants get shipped for the official Oct. 3 release date, but it looks like it will be a lot, given the pace at which the singer has already been issuing limited editions that have mostly been near-immediate sellouts.

The latest variants, as of Sept. 7, are three compact disc editions that Target will be carrying exclusively. (Target made a splash by announcing that 500 of its stores will remain open past midnight on the night of release to sell these CDs, along with the album’s standard edition, starting at 12 a.m. local time.) The newly revealed CDs from Target are the “It’s Frightening” edition, the “It’s Rapturous” edition, and the “It’s Beautiful” edition. These carry the same subtitles and cover artwork that Swift previously used for three CDs that were only available in her webstore, and quickly sold out; it’s unclear whether the Target editions have any exclusive packaging elements (apart from losing the trinkets that were advertised with the D2C versions).

One thing is clear from all these variants: Swift had some very fruitful photo sessions for this album. With each new image of each different edition, there has been a positive response to the alternative LP jackets or CD sleeves that follows along the lines of this tweet: “SHOULD’VE BEEN THE ALBUM COVER, BUT OK.”

Each of her limited editions for her own webstore releases — not including the Target variants — has arrived preceded by a countdown clock, and the promise that the variant would be on sale for 48 hours or “while supplies last.” The latter has definitely applied, as several of these releases to date have sold out within about an hour, although some took the better part of a day to sell through”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Tima Miroshnichenko/Pexels

There are clearly major artists who are cashing in and are just seeing how much they can make from fans. Some artists that release a different take of an album because it is more representative of them. Some might say that legacy artists do the same thing. Anniversary editions that are remastered or expanded so that they have some demos and outtakes. The Beatles among them. Whilst it adds layers and depths that were not present when the studio albums were released in the 1960s, all of the versions can be quite expensive. Vinyl packages that are not instantly affordable for most fans. However, I do think that there is a lot of it happening now. Artists swiftly reissuing their new album with a couple of new tracks. I guess, for legacy artists, reissues and expanded editions can add to their legacy. It can introduce their work to new fans. I am a bit torn about the subject. I can appreciate how artists today are not making money from streaming services. The only way they can earn money is from touring. Physical music not as profitable as it was decades ago. There is also pressure on artists to keep releasing music. If there is a gap of a few years even, then artists are seen as having gone away. Maybe overlooked. Reissuing albums or providing new editions keeps fans engaged. It also means that fans get these outtakes and songs not included on the album before. What do you do with these new songs? You could release them as singles, though I can understand why artists put out expanded editions with a few new songs. However, does it seem a bit too much to expect fans to shell out on this new, perhaps more expensive of an album they already have?!

People can choose not to buy that new edition, though I feel you get more value for money or something bigger with the new version. If I buy the original, I might not have money for this new version. Vinyl especially is expensive, so expanded and special editions can be pretty pricey. I don’t think most artists are trying to take advantage of fans’ dedication. I was a little galled by Taylor Swift and the various version of The Life of a Showgirl. Many fans will buy all of them and, as someone who does not need the money, what is the reason behind it? Swift might say these are collectable items. More interesting than release one version of the album and not giving fans choice. She is not the only one. Many artists put out a range of vinyl versions. Different colours and styles. Is this simply providing choice for fans or an opportunity for them to collect all the versions? I love a vinyl album with a great colour or design, but I struggle to see the purpose of multiple options. Positives of deluxe versions and reissues is that you do get something extra from artists. In the case of Kylie Minogue and Charli xcx, there are interesting reasons for their decisions. Remix albums allow us to see these songs in a different light. I do think that problems arise when there are those rushed reissues with bonus tracks. It seems a little pointless or too much. Not really offering much value. Multiple vinyl versions can cross the line into gauging fans. However, most artists do want to give their fans options and something special. Is the rise in reissues and special editions because artists realise that physical music and touring is their only revenue options? Is it more about creative freedom? I opened by talking about Dua Lipa and the Radical Optimism new version. One that extends the songs. Perhaps less to capitalise on fans’ devotion and more to do with releasing the album that she wanted to from the off. The subject of reissues, deluxe editions and multiple vinyl options is something that definitely…

DIVIDE opinion.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Revisited: Laufey

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight: Revisited

 

Laufey

__________

AN artist who is…

PHOTO CREDIT: Cara Kealy

simply extraordinary and someone I spotlighted back in 2023, I am returning to Laufey now. The Icelandic-Chinese musician, born Laufey Lín Jónsdótti, released her new album, A Matter of Time, in August. I am going to end this feature by including a review of a standout from this year. One of the most acclaimed of the year for sure, if you have not heard of Laufey, then you really do need to check her out. Rather than repeat interviews I included in 2023, I am going to get to some more recent ones. Some from this year. Laufey’s debut album, Everything I Know About Love, came out in 2022, though her debut single arrived in 2020. That was Street by Street. Some might say she is pretty established by now. With a massive social media following and a huge tour currently underway, this is a major artist. However, this feature is about revisiting someone I spotlighted when they were rising. It is amazing to come back to Laufey. Music Week chatted with her in August. As we learn from the start of the interview, last year was a pretty eventful and memorable one for Laufey:

Laufey ticked off everything she’d ever dreamed of in 2024, the sort of phenomenal year that has required the 25-year-old to draw up a new bucket list. She won a Grammy, something that felt so outlandish for her that it never even figured in her thinking when it came to lifetime goals, and played headline shows at her all-time favourite venues (Royal Albert Hall, Hollywood Bowl, Radio City Music Hall). Tick, tick, tick.

Along the way, the artist born Laufey Jónsdóttir in Reykjavik to a Chinese mother and Icelandic father began to mull over what success actually meant. She discovered that when you’re an ambitious type, as Laufey undoubtedly is, you’re always looking for the next bigger thing.

“That’s how I got to where I am,” she says. “Once I have played the 1,000-cap venue in a city, I’m excited to play the 4,000-cap venue the next year.”

But she followed this thread and wondered, where does it end?

“I’ll hopefully be playing arenas soon,” she states. “And I don’t want to play venues bigger than an arena, so it’s going to have to stop somewhere.”

Laufey’s remarkable rise is showing very few signs of slowing down, though. She is the ultimate modern trailblazer and Gen Z superstar, someone for whom there are no clear forebears to measure herself against. There have been pop artists signed to independent labels before, but not independent pop artists whose music is rooted in ye olde world classical and jazz sounds, her music giving the Great American Songbook a new twist. No one had that down as the next big thing in pop and yet, with almost 14 million monthly listeners on Spotify and nearly 650m plays for 2023 hit From The Start – not to mention 7.8m followers and 293m likes on TikTok – here we are”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Erlendur Sveinsson

I am moving to an interview from The Guardian. At a time when Laufey’s stock is rising and she is vulnerable to haters, Laufey discussed this. She also talked about filling arenas, and how she was slightly scared of success. It is a pivotal time for her. One where she has gained this whole new legion of fans and put some new music out. An artist who has to balance how much of her personal life she puts into the music:

Now Laufey is keen to rough up her reputation as gen-Z’s favourite jazz savant, at least a little. Her new album A Matter of Time splits the difference between sugar-plum symphonics with imperfect notes and vocals that crack with emotion. One song has jolting strings that she compares to a scream. “I wanted to make more of a statement on this album,” she says. “I’ve become known as a bit of a soft singer. I am that, but I also want to show parts of myself that aren’t that pretty.”

She arrived in the hotel lobby this morning on time and as neat as a pin, with a cardigan-wearing bunny rabbit dangling from her handbag. (The critter, named Mei Mei, is Laufey’s mascot and alias of sorts – she releases alternative versions of her songs under its name, and it is also available to buy, with a portion of the proceeds aiding music education as part of the Laufey Foundation.) “Do you want to go in there?” she asks, leading me into a side room and getting out the best biscuits: “It’s the guests-only lounge.” The place is done up like a hunting lodge, with artfully oxidised mirrors, a wall-mounted antelope head and, most bizarrely, given that it is summer, a burning log fire. When I comment on the strangeness, Laufey says, wryly: “Well, it’s now reached a very cool 24 degrees.”

She says she was driven by a “hunger” to imbue the new experiences of a whirlwind few years into her new album. It radiates a sense of adventure, dovetailing between twangy campfire country to swoony ballads and sherbert-spiked pop. The record is produced by Laufey and longtime collaborator Spencer Stewart: between them, they can play just about any instrument you have heard of, as well as some you may not have. I was unfamiliar with the celesta, an obscure kind of idiophone that Stewart and Laufey play on the record (it sounds like a child’s musical jewellery box). On the Busby Berkeley-worthy confection Lover Girl, she knowingly leans into her Cupid-struck image, while on Carousel, Laufey reckons with inviting a partner into her circus-like life while a seasick accordion plays. The rapturous Forget-Me-Not, recorded with the Iceland Symphony Orchestra (for which she was a teenage cello soloist), is her most accomplished work of composition to date; her voice soars among flurries of flutes.

“I wanted the album to reflect all sides of my emotional scale,” she says, huddling in air-con that has apparently been set to “Himalayan”. “Within one day, I will have a happy hour and a crying hour. I have no interest in making an album that’s one vibe throughout.” But there is, she says, an emotional through-line about learning to accept yourself while falling in love with someone else. She won’t talk about her relationship status today though, and I ask if internet scrutiny makes it hard to write candidly about her dating experiences. “There’s always a line of ambiguity,” Laufey says, before smiling mischievously. “But if you get into a situation with me, you kind of know that I might write about it.”

A Matter of Time marks her creative world opening up. Two spry new songs were created with Taylor Swift collaborator and the National founder member Aaron Dessner at his Long Pond Studios, in an experience that Laufey says “opened a third musical eye”. And she is more lighthearted than ever on Mr Eclectic, a bossa nova-inspired track featuring Clairo that pokes fun at men who mansplain classical music to her. “I just think it’s funny to be the type of man who performatively reads a beaten-up paperback outside a coffee shop,” she says, her nose wrinkling. “I’ve dated guys like that, but this is a forever type of man. Why do you think all philosophers are men? They just had the platform and the audacity”.

The last interview I am including is from ELLE. As she reveals in the interview, her audience very much are a reflection of her. She can look out at them and see people that relate to her and who give her strength. This is someone whose music has clearly connected with so many people across the world. I am excited to see what comes next for Laufey. An artist I have been following for a while, she is one of these artists who will not get the same fanfare and attention as the biggest Pop artists in the mainstream. I think Laufey’s music is stronger and goes deeper. Maybe that sort of exposure and spotlight would be too intimidating and exposing:

Women obviously create great music every year, but the last year felt like a notable moment when they were really dominating the mainstream. How did that feel for you?

I just think it’s such an incredible time to be a woman in music. It’s not only that women are dominating, but that they’re dominating in every single little corner of music as well. Everyone is so different. Doechii is making completely different music from Sabrina Carpenter. And Sabrina, Chappell Roan, and Charli xcx are pop princesses, but in such completely different ways. That is really, really beautiful, and it speaks to how modern audiences are so open to different types of music. I think women are more versatile than we’re given credit for. That’s the main thing that stood out to me this past year....Though I’m so happy with the progress that women have made in music and how much they’ve been in the forefront of driving culture, there’s such a long way to go when it comes to women in the background.

Why is it important to uplift women songwriters and producers?

You can really see when there’s a woman writing with a woman, the magic that it creates, because there’s a level of honesty. Like, a man could never get into my head, never understand what I’m going through. That’s one of the main reasons that female producers and writers should be highlighted, because nobody understands the female experience like a woman.

How do you feel about being called “Gen Z’s jazz icon”?

It’s weird, because I don’t really see myself as one genre or the other. I think when I started, I needed something to tell people. I’m a trained jazz singer, and when I was younger, before I started writing music, I only sang jazz music. I started my career singing jazz standards on TikTok, so I could see why that would be the thing that people gravitated toward saying. But as I’ve grown as a songwriter and a musician, it’s so much more than that.

How would you describe your fan base?

They are genuinely the funniest people I know. They’re so kind. Growing up, I really struggled finding a group of people that I really understood and that understood me—whether that was coming from mixed cultural backgrounds, or having mixed interests that weren’t as simple as soccer or reading. The fact that I’ve kind of summoned an audience of exactly that—it just makes my younger self really, really happy.

For fandoms, there’s this stereotype of crazy fan behavior and cultlike behavior. And though they’re [Laughs] definitely, in a way, a cult, it’s a really, really positive, happy, cute one. Very wholesome. I very, very rarely see or experience toxic behavior. It seems very friendly. I’ve heard so many stories of fans making friends with each other at concerts. It’s the best part of being a musician.

They look like me. I look out into the audience, and I just see direct reflections of me. I didn’t think I could ever gather such a big audience of Wasians. I didn’t know that was possible, but somehow it is.

They dress like me, too. Oh, my God, when it’s little girls, they’re so adorable. I feel such an immense joy, but also a deep understanding of what I am to them and how I should carry myself. It really gets me through anything”.

PHOTO CREDIT: Adrienne Raquel

Prior to wrapping things up, I will get to a positive review for A Matter of Time. One of the best albums of this year, this award-winning artist no doubt will be in the conversation when it comes to next year’s GRAMMYs. The review I want to include is a 9/10 from The Line of Best Fit. They heralded a multitalented artist who is one of the most exceptional in all of music. A big reason why I wanted to revisit her music a couple of years since I spotlighted her:

It wouldn’t be enough for Laufey to merely establish herself as a singer, lyricist, multi-instrumentalist, and aesthete. She insisted upon being exceptionally prolific at it.

Impacting with Typical of Me (2022), her debut extended play, Laufey captured critics and record buyers alike. Then over the next three years, she continued developing her sound – rich and sonorous – across another triptych of EPs, two live albums, and a pair of acclaimed full-length studio efforts, Everything I Know About Love (2022) and Bewitched (2023). These discs consolidated additional reviewer praise and grew her reach on the charts.

Bewitched earned an inaugural GRAMMY Award (“Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album”) in 2024, bringing her to the notice of the ultimate songstress herself: Barbra Streisand. Currently, Laufey features amongst a decorated roster lining Streisand’s 37th long player The Secret of Life: Partners, Volume 2 (2025). Despite this vertiginous rise, Laufey conserves her music’s core: a traditional-to-modern pop fusion curated from a complex mix of jazz, classical, acoustic, and bossa nova. It’s the ideal canvas for her voice and songwriting on third album A Matter of Time.

She refines her formula enlisting the talents of Spencer Stewart and Aaron Dessner to produce.

Dessner – one of the founders of the indie-rock clique The National – is fire-new to Laufey’s orbit; his tunesmithing on a few of Taylor Swift’s recent releases has only yielded him further renown. Stewart’s work history with Laufey on Everything I Know About Love and Bewitched makes him a welcome figure on this affair. Laufey joins them as a co-producer, partial arranger and session hand. Her way with piano, cello, electric bass, celeste, wood block, upright bass, and more (see the sleeve notes for details) demonstrate her keen abilities.

The three musicians spare no expense maintaining the filmic grandeur her projects have become known for. It casts A Matter of Time as a spellbinding experience for any audiophile. Opener “Clockwork” is a decadent slice of big band nostalgia, indicative of the quality one can expect.

Even better, there’s a deepening of Laufey’s unique, aforementioned fusion throughout. The drums feel more punctuated with “A Cautionary Tale”, the guitar-strumming feels balmier on “Castle In Hollywood”, and the strings zing just a little bit more via “Forget-Me-Not”. All these particulars are revealed with that introductory listen and will make any subsequent visit to this set as exciting as that initial spin. This method reaches a beautiful crescendo on “Cuckoo Ballet”, an instrumental reprise of A Matter of Time’s first six selections; it recalls “Nocturne”, an antecedent version of “Cuckoo Ballet” on Bewitched, but with its compositional contrast set to a brighter tone here.

Alongside Laufey’s signature styles are some fresh motifs too. The record’s lead-off single “Silver Lining” is all brushed drums, reverb, and assorted torch spice evoking the likes of Dionne Warwick or Nancy Wilson. Laufey wraps this tune around her handsome alto with an uncanny poise. “Tough Luck” begins in downbeat pop-rock fashion before flowing into a slinky, disco-lite groove with chamber pop effects. Echoes of the countrypolitan past (Emmylou Harris) and present (Maren Morris) are gorgeously realized on “Clean Air”. Laufey also dips into the adult alternative of fellow Icelander Björk circa Selmasongs (2000) on “Sabotage”. In this collision of experimental and classical pop, it is notably the economy of her voice that is its most stunning feature.

As the lead writer on every cut for A Matter of Time, Laufey continues to thread a mean needle with thematic elements. Whether it’s romance in full bloom (“Carousel”) or wilted (“Too Little, Too Late”), Laufey demonstrates that love often exists somewhere between the poles of escapism and reality.

This is done brilliantly on sister cuts “Lover Girl” and “Mr. Eclectic”. The former captures the blush of attraction before the latter uncovers evidence of incompatibility. Both are sequestered as the second and twelfth entries on the wax, respectively. The expanse between each gives them a chance to narratively breathe on their own while remaining linked as Brazilian rhythm-backed exotica.

However, the best tendered script on A Matter of Time is “Snow White”, an examination of Laufey's Icelandic-Chinese heritage and its associated societal pressures. She had approached this topic before with “Letter to My Thirteen Year Old Self” on Bewitched. This time, Laufey explores what she’s endured and her growth thereafter.

To my ear, Laufey is an emergent retro-modernist genius on par with Swing Out Sister, Pizzicato Five, Raphael Saadiq, and Emma Bunton. While their genres differ, that commitment to consistency, craft and “something old made spectacularly new” unites them. Similarly, Laufey colours both inside and outside her established lines to create a joyful tension on A Matter of Time. It makes for the boldest chapter in her artistic story yet”.

Laufey will play in the U.K. next year. She has a large fanbase here. And so many nations around the world. Her music is universal, but also there are these personal moments that take you to the heart of Laufey. She puts herself in the music, though she is aware of being judged or putting too much of herself out there. I would recommend everyone follow Laufey. The twenty-six-year-old is…

A supernova of a talent.

___________

Follow Laufey