FEATURE: Sound and Vision: Why We Need an Enduring Music-Themed T.V. Show

FEATURE:

 

Sound and Vision:

vin.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: A promotional shot from the HBO drama, Vinyl/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

Why We Need an Enduring Music-Themed T.V. Show

___________

I have always contested, when it comes to the civil war between…

ol.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: A scene from Vinyl/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

British and American drama - the U.S. had an advantage over us! Maybe it is their deeper pockets or broader pool of talent – I feel the Brits have a lot of catching up to do. Most of our drama tends to stick within family-drama-and-domestic-strife-mixed-with-police-procedurals and we could never summon anything as imaginative and long-lasting as, say Orange Is the New Black, Girls or Mr. Robot. Those shows benefited from large budgets but I feel there is something about American drama that goes beyond anything here. Sure...we can do imaginative and stunning, but most of our T.V. shows do not last into seasons: we have series and tend not to have serial drama (apart from soaps) on the air. America has failing dramas but they have given the world so many great shows. Services like Netflix and Amazon mean we are witness to a cavalcade of captivating shows that hook you in and keep you invested – spending hours/days on the sofa glued to the latest happenings.

net.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

That is not the same here...I feel the same with comedy: the U.S. is far superior when it comes to sitcoms. I look at new options like The Goldbergs and Black-ish and laugh my arse off regularly! Those shows have received mixed reviews but, for the most part, I watch the episodes and find myself bent-double with laughter. The lines are sharper and more unexpected; the premises and concepts go beyond what we offer here. That is been the case through history: America providing comedies that go beyond the obvious and are phenomenal sharp and memorable. We, here, are often lumbered with those traditional family sitcoms that rehash the same jokes and bore everyone with cringey scenarios and hapless losers. We tend to look at shows like The Office and base every comedy around the guise of the squirmy, un-P.C. lead - albeit it, one with a good heart. It gets boring but we could never create anything as belly-aching and brilliant as The Simpsons or Family Guy – our record with animated comedies is abysmal and embarrassing! So, then: what is the point of this opening?!

fam.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: A promotional shot for Family Guy/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

To me; there is a gulf between the U.S. and the U.K. In terms of T.V.; the nations are leagues-apart – that is not the case when it comes to music! I feel we are pretty evenly-matched with regards music! Despite the fact America has an incredible music economy, when it comes to converting that into film/T.V. magic – there is something a little lacking. Over the years, the U.K. has been a little more reliable when it comes to channelling the rich music scene into the screen. We have produced some great low-budget T.V. shows that have music as the backdrop; focus on periods such as the 1960s and 1970s – the effusive and transcendent vibes of the period swim into the head. This piece is compelled by the fact, over the past few years, our drama and comedies have been lacking and limited – aside from the odd one here and there; we cannot compete with the U.S. I was excited when the American T.V. drama Vinyl was announced in 2016. The premiere occurred on 14th February (2016), on HBO, and was an odd, if original, treat for Valentine’s Day! Although initial reviews were somewhat mixed; the series was renewed for a second season and, on 22nd June, 2016; the decision to continue the series was revoked. It seemed a slight retool would not improve the series - so it was not seen worth the producers’ time to continue the show. It is a shame; because I watched a few episodes and loved the performances and storylines. I am a big fan of actors like Olivia Wilde and Ray Romano and felt the ensemble was well-meshed and tight-knit. All the players were exceptional - but it was the entire cast that made it pop and resonate.

NY.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

The show was set in 1970s’ New York and the pilot saw Richie Finestra, President of American Century Records, on the verge of selling his struggling company to German Polygram - an impending distribution agreement with Led Zeppelin as part of the package. But, after an awkward encounter with Robert Plant; it's clear that the sale is in jeopardy. It goes from there but we see, through the series, various famous figures/musicians involved in the turbulent fortunes of the label; the music scene of New York in the 1970s; the characters’ lives intersect and develop - I felt it has legs and promise! Maybe it was quite niche and primed for a few episodes (rather than multiple series). Perhaps a film would have been a better fit but I feel more time and resourcing should have been paid to Vinyl. America has attempted other drama where music is the backdrop – I remember another set in Harlem that saw Hip-Hop and Rap scoring the goings-on. One other reason I was urged to pen something along these lines is because our attempts at music-based T.V. have been flat.

sounds.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

We have a series right now, Sounds Like Friday Night, that has been struggling with critics and tries to mix sketches, live performances and guest hosts together. It is a hard blend to get right and it seems like an attempt to revive the popular show, Top of the Pops. That is coming back but only for a Christmas Special. We have created plenty of music shows but few that are fictional dramas that run for any length of time. The U.S. has Friday Night Lights and Nashville: two series that have provided smashes and, not only helped put certain genres and areas of music into the spotlight; some of their stars have gone on to launch their own music careers. I was annoyed talented actors like Olivia Wilde were put into a vehicle that was destined to run out of gas shortly into the trip – I would like to have seen it go a lot further!

liv.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Olivia Wilde/PHOTO CREDIT: Mark Mann

Maybe that example was a case of a unique and ambitious show not quite hitting the mark and needing longer to bed-in. Networks and bosses are cut-throat when it comes to series: not willing to give them grace and see whether they can formulate into something successful (Breaking Bad was nearly sank because of the reluctance of networks). There is so much great music out there, past and present, that deserves some form of compassion and proper treatment. If Vinyl was the U.S.’ best attempt of the past few years: I wonder what Britain has to offer?! I would like to see something that combines the best U.S. and U.K. actors and spreads its time between both nations. I am fascinated by everything from the best 1960s Pop to the 1990s; the Dance scene of the latter and the incredible rush and genius we got from the former. It would be a comedy-drama and would look at various periods of music and the artists of the time – soundtracked by the finest songs of the time...

lux.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

I am thinking something that mixes the concept of Vinyl but brings in more comedic elements. Not only would a dramatic series – either financed by a British or American studio – be beneficial but we need other options, too. Here, we have a couple of televised music shows - but there is nothing that really gets into the mind and stays in the memory. Gone are the days where we lusted after chart sounds and tuned into Top of the Pops. In the U.S.; there are endless chat-shows – that feature music guests among the line-up – but very few other options that dispense with nauseating hosts and concentrate on the music itself! We have huge and growing radio stations but why can we not convert the rich and endless wealth of great music into something televised? I know acting and T.V./film is a different discipline but I worry T.V. bosses and studios are too rigid when it comes to comedy and drama.

Maybe I am drooling over the potential, shine and chain-smoking wonder of Vinyl - and baffled why it did not remain on the air longer. I am as big a music fan as anyone out there and feel there is a concept that could take music, historical or present, that captivates the masses and has that sustainable energy. Times are bad in the outside world so that desire for escapism and the arts is at an all-time high. We want to engage with something that reminds us of all the good out there; the brilliance of music and all the pleasure it brings. Listening to it is fine - but I feel there is so much more to get from the industry. I am fatigued and bored by our attempts at ‘comedy’. There have been a couple of great modern sitcoms but, largely, we produce the same thing - and we do not have the same writing talent as the U.S. That goes for drama and, whereas we can do gritty and domestic; we do not have the creative imagination and finances to do something as ambitious and scintillating as Breaking Bad.

shot.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

The music industry is different and, when it comes to comparing the two nations; each has their own strengths. The U.K. has produced the best music ever – I am thinking about the likes of The Beatles – and our modern Indie/Alternative scene is stronger. America has finer Hip-Hop artists and, whilst Rap stars like Eminem are past their best days, we cannot reach the same levels as Jay-Z, Kendrick Lamar and Princess Nokia. Our nations have had their problems; we both have vastly unpopular leaders who are leading the world into peril and strife. I feel we need to come together and combine our wonderful music and entertainment industries. Not that a well-oiled and colourful music show will remedy the wounds inflicted by our leaders but we here need something to revitalise our T.V. shows – something that employs music and does something creative and inspiring with it. The U.S. has a stronger film and T.V. sector but it has struggled to create a music show that has endured (apart from the likes of Nashville). I am not sure what this as-yet-unreleased show would be called - but I am not the only one who feels the world deserves a format that unites T.V. and music…

music.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images  

INTO something glorious.

FEATURE: Ones to Watch in 2018: Part I: London Pop and L.A. Indie (and Beyond)

FEATURE:

 

Ones to Watch in 2018:

fon.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: The Fontaines 

Part I: London Pop and L.A. Indie (and Beyond)

___________

I will write another three instalments…

L.A.D.jpg

where all manner of artists will come under the radar. The first part focuses on Britain but does include some international talent – from the U.S. and Canada to Estonia and Australia. It does provide a window into what 2018’s music will look like; the artists who will make an impression and steps. I am looking forward to digging deeper into music and what will come along. It is an exciting time right now and there are so many great acts coming through...

Take a peek at the selected acts that, I feel, are going to make some moves towards the mainstream; continue to grow and establish themselves as stars-in-waiting…

___________

Rookes

rookes.jpg

Genres: Alternative; Indie-Pop

Location: Birmingham, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/iamrookes/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/iamrookes

Richard Hadfield

ri.jpg

Genres: Pop; Soul

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/RichardHadderz/

Official: https://www.richardhadfield.london/

Koko Clay

ko.jpg

Genre: Future-Soul

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/Kokoclaymusic/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/darealkokoclay

 

False Advertising

fal.jpg

Genre: Alternative

Location: Manchester, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/falseadv/

Official: http://falseadvertising.co/

IYKZ

IYKZ.jpg

Genres: Rap; Hip-Hop

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/iykziykz/

Official: https://www.iykzhq.com/

Tina Karol

tina.jpg

Genre: Pop

Location: Ukraine

Follow:  https://www.facebook.com/tina.karol/

Official: http://tinakarol.com/en/

Rosko

boys.jpg

Genre: Alternative

Location: London, U.K.

Followhttps://www.facebook.com/roskotheband/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/roskoband

Gianni Paci

gi.jpg

Genres: Pop; Alternative

Location: New York, U.S.A.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/giannipacimusic/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/giannipacimusic

Tiny Giant

tiny.jpg

Genres: Dream-Pop; Future-Rock

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/TinyGiantmusic/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/_Tiny_Giant

Megan Dixon Hood

meg.jpg

Genre: Alterative-Folk

Location: Cheshire, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/megandixonhood/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MegDHmusic

Featurette

feat.jpg

Genre: Electro-Pop

Location: Toronto, Canada

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/featurettemusic/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/FeaturetteMusic

 

Galaxians

ga.jpg

Genre: Dance

Location: Leeds, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/galaxiansband/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/GLXNS

Mondegreen

mond.jpg

Genre: Acoustic-Folk

Location: Widnes, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/heymondegreen/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/heymondegreen

L.A.D

lad.jpg

Genres: Dance; Pop

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/LADbandofficial/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/LADbandofficial

Alex Francis

al.jpg

PHOTO CREDITJPBoardman

Genre: Pop

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/alexfrancismusic/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/afrancismusic

Winter Mountain

WINTER.jpg

Genres: Folk; Rock; Soul; Pop

Location: St. Ives, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/wintermountain/

Official: http://www.wintermountain.co.uk/

Anteros

ant.jpg

Genre: Pop

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/anterosofficial/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/anterosofficial

Tamara Bubble

tam.JPG

Estée Blue

est.jpg

Genres: Soul; Jazz; R&B

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/EsteeBlu/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/esteeblu

Bare Traps

bare.jpg

Genre: Indie-Pop

Location: London, U.K.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/baretrapsband/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BareTrapsBand

The Fontaines

ts.jpg

Genre: Indie-Pop

Location: Los Angeles, U.S.A.

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/thatfontainesound/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheFontaines

Elephants from Neptune

el.jpg

Genre: Rock

Location: Võsu, Estonia

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/elephantsfromneptune/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/NeptuneElephant

Vallis Alps

vallis.jpg

Genre: Electronic

Location: Seattle, U.S.A.; Canberra, Australia

Follow: https://www.facebook.com/vallisalps/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/vallisalps

 

FEATURE: End the Silence: The Song That Defines Your Childhood

FEATURE:

 

End the Silence:

sile.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images 

The Song That Defines Your Childhood

___________

THERE are few campaigns…

ch.jpg

PHOTO CREDITHope and Homes for Children

that allows one to donate to a great charity and share their early memories of music! Hope and Homes for Children want people to participate in their End the Silence campaign. Orphanages are there, you’d think, to protect children but it seems, around the world, they are a place of mistreatment and neglect. There are many growing up in environments that are hostile, cold and cruel. It is happening all over the world and it has been said as many as thirty-seven in every one-hundred children in orphanages are subject to sexual abuse.  A lot of the worst cases of abuse occur in developing nations but there is no excuse for the terrible conditions and violent scenes that are almost common practice in these orphanages. Children who grow up here are much more likely to commit suicide and take to prostitution – their lives are a lot more fragile and uncertain than you could possibly imagine. I would urge people to look at the charity’s website and discover the events and fundraisers they are doing to help stem the problem. You cannot shut down all orphanages – and put children into loving homes – but the aim is to rehome and protect as many children as possible. This all brings me to the point of this piece. The charity is asking, before you donate, to name the song you grew up to; the songs that have scored your childhood – the musical memories that stand out from the rest.

bl.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Many who grow up in orphanages would not have access to music but the objective is to get people thinking about their childhood and that piece of music that takes you back to a great time. Before I provide my thoughts; the Telegraph asked a series of musicians the one song they would select. They provided a rundown and assessment of Hope and Homes for Children’s aims and campaign:

Hope and Homes for Children aims to create the world’s largest online musical memory collection, and raise £1.5 million by Christmas, allowing them to transform the lives of 120,000 children across Rwanda and Uganda who are confined to orphanages. Some of the biggest stars today are helping launch the campaign by revealing their own most precious musical memories.

So what song would you choose? End The Silence would like you to share your memories, along with a donation, for a very good cause. The UK government is committed to doubling every pound donated before Dec 27. For me, the question throws me back to being a small boy listening to my father singing Sunrise Sunset from Fiddler on the Roof. A song of experience, ageing and melancholy that, I think, gave me some strange intimation of the hugeness of the life ahead of me, while binding me in the enduring love of my family. If I close my eyes, I can still hear him singing it.”

getty.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Paloma Faith/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Paloma Faith picked her song: Why (1988) by Tracy Chapman:

The memories I get from this track are of road-trips with my mum and my stepdad. We would always have that album in the car and that track was particularly poignant for me because my mum – who’s a caring, compassionate, empathetic person – used to like songs with a political tinge; she was quite involved in politics. It asked lots of questions about why things are happening, actually still relevant today, as human beings tend to make the same mistakes over and over again. The song reminds me of being quite small, laying back on the back seat and really wanting to know all the words off by heart.”

Sir Elton John picked Doris Day’s The Deadwood Stage as his choice:

I had to have a tooth out at my local dentist and in those days they either just pulled it out straight or you could have a bit of gas so the only way I was going to do it was if my mum bought that record for me after. So I had my tooth out, by gas, and we got on the bus to Norwood Hills and the hole was pouring blood and we went into the record store and we bought The Deadwood Stage. And I clutched it, I loved it so much, I couldn’t wait to get home and I played it and I played it and I played it and I played it.”

el.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sir Elton John/PHOTO CREDIT: EPA

It is impossible to choose the one song that defines childhood – because there are so many that have played their part – but the 1990s was when I was going through school and discovering some of the finest music ever made. I have fond memories of early-1990s Dance and the chart music of the time; some fantastic Pop and brilliant artists from past years. I was exposed to my parents’ tastes but was spending my formative years in the best decade of music. The one song that springs to mind is, oddly, Breathe by The Prodigy. This song often found its way – in a non-yobbish way – being projected from the speakers of my mate’s house where I grew up. The year would have been 1997 – when the band’s album, The Fat of the Land, was released; I would go round his (Stefan’s) house after school/at the weekends where we would take advantage of the quiet afternoons and play football. When the weather was less clement; we would play with a tennis ball in his house – we would do that in the evenings when Match of the Day was on, too. It is strange how a certain song can draw all those events and experiences together: Breathe has that effect and brings my mind to a distinct time and place. I was a kid whose ears were always open to music; every genre and sound around was fair game to me.

breathe.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

To me, the song is the soundtrack to those warm days where the windows were open and the sun was out. I would walk to Stefan’s house – mine was about a minute’s walk from his – and I would pass his dog (Bruno) and up the stairs. In his bedroom was an impressive stereo system with some seriously meaty speakers! Jamiroquai was also played a lot so I was getting Trance/Acid-House bliss-outs with diamond-toed jive and dance. The football-scoring disco was a really happy memory at a time when things were pretty good. The football set-up was a field that backed out from the house. Sometimes we would use the goalposts at our middle-school (just over the road) but there was the perfect spot just outside Stefan’s house. When the music was played from the window – not too loud as to irk neighbours – we would play and take turns shooting. Often; we would set two goalposts or a couple of jumpers laid down at one end of the field. Neighbour kids would join in and, sometimes, we would get a nice five-a-side going and, before you know it, that song took on new intensity and meaning! The energy and frantic scuff of the track was the perfect propulsive anthem for the most spirited and fevered football. We would waste hours kicking back and forth and playing until it got dark.

fat.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Of course; there were other songs from that album (such as Firestarter) that got into the mind but Breathe seemed to take on the mantle of influencer and standout. It is a song I listen to and flood back to that time. The mind projects the conversations and games that were played; the idle larks and easy-going vibe. The guy I have mentioned, whose house/music supplied the soundtrack, lives near the house I have mentioned – although he is married with children right now. I have driven past the house a number of times and see children playing football on the same field – some twenty years after I was there! It is humbling seeing the same scenes playing out; the fact the houses have barely changed – and not succumbed to endless gentrification and redevelopment – means there is a preservation and purity that remains in the area. School was an interesting time and I have taken many happy memories from it. Music played a huge role and helped me cope with hard situations; scored those anxious moments and the celebratory times – such as opening my G.C.S.E. envelope and seeing what results I achieved! It was that mid-high-school period (1997) that saw me step out of the infantile boots of school and prepare my mind for a transition into adulthood. I was reluctant to relinquish the comfy grip of childhood and all the scary changes of the next stage of life. Breathe is that strange but beautiful reminder of how things were: the mere scent of the song provides escapism and a lot of pleasure.

kids.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

It is strange how music does that and why certain songs attach themselves to the brain in such a passionate and permanent way. As I said; there are other songs that accompany other times and, when I hear them now, bring back all the smells, sounds and sensations from the time. It is emotional thinking there are children who will never hear music: the only sounds they will hear are screaming and their own crying. I guess we take music for granted and do not really spend time thinking how valuable and precious it is. So long as you donate to Hope and Homes for Children; take a few moments to think about the one song that represents your childhood. It does not have to be a song that soundtracks a hard time or a passage of happiness. It can be a piece of music that brings back memories or made you connect with the world in a new way. An ear-blaring piece of Big-Beat music might not seem like the obvious connection to a carefree and fun time where energy was burned and happy thoughts wafted into the air. Regardless, mind; what I have found is writing about that song has drawn me back to a period in my life that was very formative and memorable. Have a think about the song - use the hashtag #EndTheSilence on Twitter if you post your choice online - you would select (donating as you go) and help…

woman.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Shutterstock

END the silence.

FEATURE: You’d Better Think: Why 2018 Needs to See a Massive Change in Attitudes

FEATURE:

 

You’d Better Think:

ALEX.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Alexandra Burke/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

 Why 2018 Needs to See a Massive Change in Attitudes

___________

THIS piece relates to music…

Time.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Billy & Hells (for TIME)

in the sense there are problems and imbedded ills that need remedying and eradicating. I will go on to look at why this year’s selection for TIME’s ‘Person’ of the Year was a popular choice – and why its runner-up shows that decision was almost undercut by a ridiculous decision. I am appalled there have been so many cases of sexual abuse and sexism this year – music has not escaped from the worst. Although there are not the same high-profile stars being outed and caught short – Dustin Hoffman continues to get allegations against his name; Kevin Spacey seems to be in the news a lot – there are some icky and horrible events that have left a sour taste. I feel social media is a useful tool for promoting music and events but can be equally useful when it comes to rallying support and confronting those who commit wrongs. Of course; there is the reverse issue: people having free speech and being able to say exactly what they want without criminalisation and punishment. I will look at a recent case of racism that blighted the music industry but another revolved around presenter Reggie Yates. I do not want to get so heavy-handed before Christmas but there are continuous issues that need to be addressed and extinguished. Yates made, what I believe to be, offhanded and ‘innocent’ remark that saw him step down as presenter of this Christmas’ Top of the Pops special. The details are as follows:

The presenter and documentary maker said it was "great" to see how grime artists were no longer being managed by "some random fat Jewish guy from north-west London".

Yates was accused of anti-Semitism on social media and later made a statement addressing the comments.

"On a recent podcast, during a discussion about grime artists, I made some ill-considered remarks which have hurt many people. I can see clearly that the words I used reinforced offensive stereotypes, and there is no context that would justify such remarks.

"My comments are no reflection on how I truly feel, and I would like to apologise unreservedly to the Jewish community, people in the music industry and anyone else I have offended”.

There are some who can say, given the setting, Yates would want to project an image of cool and rebellion – it is only natural a Grime podcast would bring out a little mischief and loose tongues. The thing is; the Grime community do not behave in that manner and Yates was not put under any pressure to make that remark. It seems rather flippant and jokey but, given the fact it was broadcast to a large audience, there was no excuse to make such a foolish comment. He would, I hope, not consider making such a remark on BBC Breakfast, for instance. Clara Amfo has replaced Yates and it will be good to see her given the opportunity present a fantastic show.

reg.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Reggie Yates/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Yates’ departure calls into questions whether there should be stricter penalties for artists/celebrities who create infractions and controversy. This is a topic I have brought up a lot recently: the fact we are seeing so many cases in the news means the subject is not going away! Yates did the right thing and stepped aside: I wonder whether, in the wake of the incident, there need to be stronger messages sent out. Although Yates’ remarks were not a shot against the Jewish community; it was a rather ill-advised thing to say. Amfo would not be caught making such a remark but I wonder, given his good name, Yates felt the remark would be taken seriously and it was not a big deal. It is, in the grand scheme of things, not the worst thing we have heard this year but it is sad to say a prolific and respectful figure like Reggie Yates fall victim to a problem that is becoming more common. One hardly goes to the Mail Online for its wisdom, intelligence and depth but, yesterday, an article surfaced that caught my eye. The piece looked at the possibility the voters of Strictly Come Dancing (the public) have a racial bias against black artists:

Despite either consistently topping the leader board or scoring highly, Strictly Come Dancing contestant Alexandra Burke has found herself languishing in the bottom two for the last two weeks.

al.jpeg

PHOTO CREDIT: Press Association

The former X Factor star has also faced a backlash from viewers, who have branded her 'fake' for becoming emotional after some of her performances.

Now an academic has told FEMAIL that the real reason Alexandra Burke has become so hated on the BBC dancing show is simply down to the colour of her skin.

Professor Shirley Tate, from Leeds Beckett University, said that race is a 'massive factor' in her unpopularity in the ballroom dancing contest - which she argues is still perceived as a 'white' performance art.

While Alexandra, 29, won The X Factor in 2008, the race expert said that this was a 'different arena' to Strictly - with the former champion fitting the 'stereotype' that as a black woman she should 'be a good singer’”.

It does seem strange that, for someone who is scoring huge respect, the public should vote against her. If one looks at proficiency and talent; Burke deserves to be in the top-three final positions – many feel she can go on and win it. There are some who claim her emotional displays are contrived and designed to accrue votes but Burke is a sensitive human who has encountered some tough times. Maybe the design of The X Factor – where the histrionics of sob stories are seen as natural and part of the entertainment – is not quite the same as Strictly Come Dancing.

str.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: HANDOUT

Trolls took to social media to voice their opinions against Alexandra Burke and her low finishing. She has been in the bottom-two the past couple of weeks and, rather than praise her and provide support, many have been providing comments that have hate, racism and sexism in them. Whereas figures such as Reggie Yates have been caught up in controversial/racist storms: Alexandra Burke is someone who has had to defend racism and cope with a wave of abuse and trolling. One can claim there is a talent-only policy whereby the strongest dancers are rewarded; the weakest ones are put to the public vote. The judges are responsible for the drama and have not helped the cause a lot. I will end this piece by looking at sexism – as I started out – but do we need to address issues of race more fervently?! An institution like Strictly Come Dancing is at the forefront of the national attention and has had black celebrities on the show. Although Alexandra Burke has been put in the bottom-two two weeks on the trot; she has had to deal with the death of her mother and outside commitments. The subject of race and parity extends beyond music but this is an occurrence that is affecting a musician. Not only do we all need to think about the way we address race – and why shows like Strictly are seen as more favourable towards white dancers – but consider social media and how damaging negative comments can be.

car.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Caroline Polachek/PHOTO CREDIT: Tom Newton

You can say what you want about Burke and any reports of diva-like behaviour and over-emoting. That has nothing to do with her talent – I do not believe any of the allegations – and there is no rational reason why she was demoted to the dance-off places when she has put in such a solid and consistently impressive display through the course. Fellow dancers like Gemma Atkinson have not had to face the same scrutiny and judgement – despite the fact many see her as a weaker option. Greater jurisprudence and dignity needs to be shown by those who take to social media; questions need to be raised regarding race and how big a problem it is at the moment. I am continuing to see racist attitudes and behaviour extend into the fabric of music. There are fewer opportunities for black and minority artists; genres like Hip-Hop, which is only now starting to get proper award recognition, is a largely black genre – and has had to struggle for recognition and respect. Not only is racism and insensitivity a problem that needs greater tackling in 2018: sexism and gender division is another aspect that we need to put under the microscope. Musician Caroline Polachek, when put on an all-female billing (without consent) for Moogfest; took to Twitter and expressed her anger. She explained how she doesn’t need a pedestal and it seems like a rather patronising and insincere move – she wants to be in with the boys and get billing based on her talent and ability.

caroline.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

It brings into questions about gender and how sexism is growing. It is common in acting – female stars paid less than men; fewer females nominated at award shows – but it is happening a lot in music. The lack of female names troubling the headline spots at the big festivals calls into question the sanctity and balance of music. Are we restricting female artists for good reasons?! It is obvious the best female artists are as strong as the men; they have commercial appeal and are capable of shouldering the responsibilities of a festival spot. We have seen artists like Lorde take to Glastonbury this year – she is someone who could headline in a couple of years. I have written extensively about sexism in music (so shall not go down the same path again) but there are –isms that we need to erode and highlight. There are artists/figures making racist remarks; stars being confronted by racist attitudes and excluded due to the colour of their skin. There are female artists who are receiving less because of their gender; festivals and events that are putting men at the top of the bill; discrimination and sexualisation – objectified and cheapened rather than allowed to have their say and been afforded equality. We have known about these problems for decades but I wonder whether, in a year where people like Donald Trump are making the world a much darker place, 2018 needs to be a year where more love, tolerance and equality comes through.

ashley.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Ashley Judd/PHOTO CREDIT: Billy & Hells (for TIME)

You cannot banish all the evil and crap you get on social media but tougher restrictions need to be put in so those who create hate and perpetuate negativity should be banned or punished in harsher tones. That goes for celebrities who, foolishly or otherwise, let their mouth overtake their brain. We are in a time where there is a chance a second Cold War could unfold; where the communist regime of North Korea is going toe-to-toe with the U.S. We could see ourselves being led into the abyss and, with no way to stop the mad and deranged posturing of leaders in both nations; it is a rather scary time. I wonder why we are in a time where shows, people and industries seem to think racism and sexism are okay; where people are shown little respect and have to struggle because of their gender and skin colour. We are allowing trolls to have too much of a say and allowing an industry as fine as music to be tarnished. I have read recent news stories that focused on sexism. One looked at a bar that said it does not have female-led bands because women are not good Rock singers – I cannot remember the name of the place. Women are being seen as weak and less; the black population judged and seen as inferior – how do we allow this to continue and spread?! It is not just music that is afflicted: so many other sides of the entertainment world are culpable and need monitoring.

adama.JPG

IN THIS PHOTO: Adama Iwu/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

I said I’d leave you with TIME and the reason they provided a brave group of women with their top honour. Included in that are figures like Selma Blair, Taylor Swift; Megyn Kelly, Adama Iwu; Amanda Schmitt, Rose McGowan; Alyssa Milano and Ashley Judd. These figures provided their story to TIME and opened up. They have each encountered discrimination, abuse and fear at the hands of their male counterparts. The Silence-Breakers included academics, bloggers and actors; there are men included in the group and it is a collective that has shamed those guilty and broken taboos. They have been held back through fear of reprisal and further abuse but have spoken out to ensure more women (and men) do not face what they have been through. It has been a long road but there are changes coming into the acting profession. The issue of sexism and abuse extends right throughout the world so the more we converse and expose those culpable, the faster the problem will be beaten. There has been enough idiocy and discrimination in music this year: looking at The Silence-Breakers should set an example of how we need to tackle subjects like sexism and racism. I know 2017 has been a hard year for us all but I hope, with their example ringing in the ears…

demi.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Demi Lovato (who called out TIME for including Donald Trump sd their runner-up for Person of the Year; praised the decision to award the honour to The Silence-Breakers)/PHOTO CREDIT: Michael Kovac/Getty Images for Refinery29

2018 produces a much more balanced and loving world!

FEATURE: Youth Is Wasted on the Foolish: Why Age-Related Discrimination Is Damaging the Music Industry

FEATURE:

 

Youth Is Wasted on the Foolish:

partry.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

Why Age-Related Discrimination Is Damaging the Music Industry

___________

THE legends of music always have the best stories…

TV.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

so it makes me wonder why the industry in which they work is so keen to relegate and marginalise them! I was watching P!nk being interviewed by Graham Norton a few days ago - where she explained how her music is no longer on the playlists of certain radio stations. She can get onto BBC Radio 2 but the younger, ‘hipper’, colleagues at BBC Radio 1 have consigned her to the dustbin of nostalgia and Get the Party Started. Even though P!nk’s most-famous hit was released fourteen years ago; the teenage progeny of time does not mean she is a different human – her music is more mature and grown-up now. The aforementioned track is a banger, for sure, and one that, if released today, could get on regular rotation on the finest stations around. I wonder why an artist who has gained respect and enjoyed a career spanning this number of years is struggling to get the same sort of attention as she enjoyed in the early-2000s. One can argue quality is an important factor: her newer material a bit more easy on the body (translation: for a middle-aged audience). The Equality Act is a law which protects people from discrimination. It means that discrimination or unfair treatment on the basis of certain personal characteristics, such as age, is now against the law in almost all cases.

p!NK.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: P!nk/PHOTO CREDIT: Andrew MacPherson

That is the law and applies to the workplace. I wonder why there are laxer laws and morals when it comes to music! If the radio stations/industry was transported into the real-world environment then you would find a lot of tribunals and complaints being lodged. Now, as music is immune from such laws, they can operate in a much less compassionate fair-minded manner. There are some who say, because most music is digital these days, any artist can release music – nobody would see their face or know their age. That is fine in principle but, when it comes to performing that song on T.V., that artist would be rumbled (unless they invested in cosmetics). A couple of years ago, when Madonna released her single, Living for Love, she was bumped from the BBC Radio 1 playlist. I caught a piece in the Independent that documented the case; the reaction Madonna provided – and why her comments opened eyes:

"I was like, 'Wait a second. Shouldn't it be to do with whether you wrote a good, catchy pop song?” she said.

"My manager said to me, 'If you're not in your twenties, it's hard. You might get your record played in your thirties. There's a handful of people who do - Pharrell [41] got lucky. But if you're in your fifties, you can forget it'.

Listen to Madonna’s music since her early-1980s beginnings and one will not see a degradation and downward trajectory. In fact, when Ray of Light arrived in 1998, Madonna was in her late-thirties. That would seem like the approaching flutter of death to a station like BBC Radio 1. Consider that album is regarded as a pivotal moment, not only in her career, but the move of Electronic music from the underground to the mainstream – surely, that proves why the issue of age is, well…not an issue. The fact Madonna was nearing forty at that time means she had the experience and determination to make an album that pushed on from her early work and subverted expectation. Since then; she has racked up some stunning albums and continues to crack out defiant and vivacious music. The same piece brought some business-minded, alarming comments to the world:

George Ergatoudis, who chairs the weekly playlist meetings, was asked in February 2014 whether he would play Madonna's next single if she agreed to appear at Radio 1's Big Weekend.

"We've got to concentrate on [people aged] 15-30,” he said.

"We have to bring our average age down. That's something we're very conscious of.

"The vast majority of people who like Madonna, who like her music now, are over 30 and frankly, we've moved on from Madonna."

The policy has not stopped 72-year-old Paul McCartney being played, via his collaboration Rihanna and Kanye West on "Four Five Seconds", or many artists over the age of 30 like Foo Fighters frontman Dave Grohl”.

These comments show what an alarmingly rigid and foolish policy some of our radio stations adopt. I know BBC Radio 1 is a (stupid) exception but it is one of the most-heard stations in the country! It is where a lot of young listeners go to get their fix of the hottest new sounds and artists who are being tipped for great things. How are they going to know where music came from, and the icons who pushed it to this point, if they do not have exposure to the music? Digital platforms promote new music and it is less likely listener of a certain age (younger) are going to explore the annals and archives. Radio is the portal for the finest older and new music – having such a tight age-bracket seems ludicrous! Is it the case where you have to be under thirty to get onto the ‘cool’ station; between thirty and fifty to get onto the ‘popular’ station – if you are over fifty then you might as well build your own station! Look at articles related to ageism in music and you will find everyone from Mel C, Sheryl Crow and Yoko Ono talking about. In fact, Sheryl Crow released new music this year (the album, Be Myself) and discussed the issue of age with Hello Giggles:

"The younger rock and pop stuff is very sexual and in some ways, it’s being used to illustrate having power. For older women, it feels ageist when everything is geared toward 15- to 25-year-olds," she said. "But I’ll be honest, in some ways, it’s liberating. I wanna make sure that the young female artists like Lorde, who are creating beautiful artistry, know that there’s power in that. There’s power in what Adele does when she just stands there and sings. "There’s as much power in that if not more than there is in projecting sexual images which are fine and all, but not to be misconstrued as being about beauty or power. "Women are powerful for many reasons, not just their bodies."

crow.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sheryl Crow/PHOTO CREDIT: Mark Seliger

The title of Crow’s album seems bitterly ironic given the fact remaining who she is causing commercial erosion and comparative anonymity. Listen to one of her 1990s songs like Everyday Is a Winding Road and her new material and, in terms of subject, there are very few changes. The arrival of motherhood and new responsibilities have not dampened her prowess and mental acuity. Crow is the same sharp writer and compelling singer she was when her name was all over the press. There are, sure, more songs that look at maternal/domestic ideals but, when you consider many young artists are talking about shallow and deplorable subjects – why should the older, wiser artist suffer?! Tori Amos, when quizzed about the subject of ageism in her (2014) record Unrepentant Geraldines, was pragmatic and impressively calm:

Well, I think there’s a real reason why. There are more men getting frontline record deals 50 and up than women. The culture sees women 50 and up as being vital for telling stories now. If we’re looking at men making records, they’re talking about all kinds of things that people of all ages can relate to, not just from the perspective of a 50-year-old guy singing a song. It could be that way for women. Does our culture see men as they get experience and getting older as storytellers more attractive and pleasing to hear?

tori.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: Tori Amos/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Image

I think what I’ve been trying to do for myself is begin to see that you have to be telling stories that are vital. You have to be very aware of what’s happening in the world and you cannot succumb to the projection of the masses. Other women who are my age said to me, ‘You have got to see yourself as all your creations, and it has to be the vision of yourself and then build a shape of that. Look at that like a piece of architecture, and from the time you turn 50, you’re going to extend this shape and this building that will go on for the next thirty, forty years of your life”.

I am not bringing all these interviews into the mix to save my hands – more to show that, over the years, many artists have come through and said the same thing: they reach a certain age and their careers are endangered and limited. That Amos interview was back in 2014; Madonna came forward in 2015; Yoko Ono – who embraced/embraces growing old and is in rude form – was around the same time. There are patterns emerging. For a start; there are very few men coming forward claiming age discrimination. We have those old and legendary male musicians but now, given the age restrictions, how many mature female artists will be in the mindset years from now?! Madonna has endured because her music hit its peak at a time when streaming and stringent marketing rules were not in place. There were the same barriers back in the 1990s - but I was listening to the radio back then and would hear a mix of young and older artists on the same stations. The last few years have exacerbated the problem of ageism.

jay.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Jay-Z/PHOTO CREDIT: Nathaniel Goldberg 

There is that debate that concerns quality vs. age. Why, then, are many older acts like Jay-Z getting credible radio-play; why are bands like Foo Fighters still being played on BBC Radio 1 – whereas acts like P!nk and Madonna are being stricken from their playlists?! One can argue, regardless of age, the best sounds will find themselves played on ALL stations. This is stringently not true. I saw a piece, written a few years back, that claimed ageism was old-hat. The journalist felt many great male acts were hyped and lauded by the kids – it is clearly an issue of quality and promoting those who have the same skill and abilities (as in their) heyday. I could easily say the latest Foo Fighters record is weaker than the sort of material Madonna was pumping out in 2005. The Madonna record, Confessions on a Dance Floor, was unveiled and gained big critical respect. She was, I think, forty-six/seven when that album came out! Look at Dave Grohl’s band and their latest album, Concrete and Gold. That record scored weaker reviews, and yet Dave Grohl is forty-eight – older than Madonna was when she released a superior record. She struggled to get the hits on her record played on a certain station: Grohl does not have to fight the D.J.s to ensure the latest Foos tracks get adequate oxygen!

rad.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Getty Images

Legends like Sir Paul McCartney, Stevie Wonder and Robert Plant are capable of releasing sensational, inspiring music – even though they are getting on in years! I doubt Robert Plant’s excellent album, Carry Fire, was in the minds of certain radio stations (we know which ones) this year. You can argue about quality all you look but what they mean is ‘cool’. It is all very well being Eminem, Jay-Z and Dre. Dre - because those guys are seen as cooler and more hip. The icons of Hip-Hop are good: the ensuing recipients of hip ops are less fashionable! There is sexism in the equation but, above all, there is a stuck-up and condescending attitude that objectifies artists who are deemed ‘too old’ or ‘past it’. Many female artists are being pushed aside but the problem extends to both genders. It is good having stations like BBC Radio 6 Music and BBC Radio 2 play your music but there are dozens of other brands that instantly ostracise certain acts – castigated because of age; without anyone listening to see if their music carries any weight and relevance. I feel a new forty-year-old artist could pen the modern-day equivalent of Revolver but, if a station head sees their age next to the album, they have no chance of getting it through the door.

paul.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sir Paul McCartney/PHOTO CREDIT: Mary McCartney

You can’t honestly argue the stations who are ageist are placing quality and innovation over all-inclusiveness, surely?! Listen to a sample buffet of youth-orientated songs and it is enough to shrivel the testicles and turn one into a cloistered monk – so they can evade music for the rest of their life! I am a big fan of newer Pop acts like Lorde but one wonders, when she exceeds thirty, the same stations who are proclaiming her a genius now will turn their backs later down the line. She could release much finer material but, because she does not fit in with their demographic; that is it for you, I’m afraid! I listen to an album like Ray of Light and marvel at its invention and longevity. It is a record that exceeds the standards of anything being pumped out by today’s young.

lorde.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Lorde/PHOTO CREDIT: Mark Mahaney (for TIME)

We are living in a time when music’s quality and passion does not matter in the grand scheme. Yes, age is a number - but it is budgeted and judged as harshly as anything in the music industry. Should we reject and retire artists when they get past thirty?! Do we assume what is being played on stations like BBC Radio 1 is the finest and most relevant music around?! The answer to both is a fat and assured ‘no’! We are making breakthroughs (slight as they are) regards racism and sexism in the music industry. Ageism is still that ‘taboo’ and the smelly derelict that is left on the bench to fester – poked with a stick now and then to check if he/she is still alive. We cannot incubate an issue that is curtailing and quelling the careers of musicians who have given so much to the industry – they are being retired-off without any dignity or explanation. I shall leave you with words spoken by the eighty-four-year-old Yoko Ono – when she was asked about her age and whether she should ‘act it’.

I am covering my ears not to listen to you guys! Don’t stone me! Let me be! Love me plenty for what I am!

Those words are far wiser and smarter than anything the self-anointed, too-cool-for-school

DMRXOvzVQAEoNd2.jpg

ART CREDIT: Yoko Ono/SOURCE: Acorn (Yoko Ono, 2013)

FOOLISH radio bosses (of youth-based stations) have ever said!

FEATURE: Mighty Rearrangers: How Fantastic Programming, Sequencing and Tracklisting Can Define an Album

FEATURE:

 

Mighty Rearrangers:

ru.jpg

  PHOTO CREDITS (unless stated otherwise): Getty Images

How Fantastic Programming, Sequencing and Tracklisting Can Define an Album

___________

THE way an album is arranged and organised is not…

studio.jpg

something many of us thinks about! Maybe it is a side-effect of the Internet generation; perhaps we do not listen to albums in their entirety. This piece was sparked by Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours. There are few near-perfect albums in this world: this would certainly be one of them. It is a rare record where you cannot fault the quality of the songs – there is not a weak track on the album. I am amazed the record was made, let alone sounds so good – the band were going through arguments, break-ups and serious drug abuse during the recording and release. Even though leader Lindsey Buckingham exerted most productive control; the music was from the entire band and it is the effort of each person in Fleetwood Mac that makes it so special. Whether it is Stevie Nicks’ Dreams – a song the band were not too keen on; she was given little time to record it, considering her ex-boyfriend Buckingham was guiding things – or the incredible Songbird (Christine McVie); the group togetherness of The Chain; Buckingham’s Go Your Own Way or the hopeful Don’t Stop (another McVie song) – so much wonder and treasure! I adore the album and never feel like it has Buckingham’s spit and fingers in every corner. It is a group recording and one that sounds astonishing considering the circumstances and times. What struck me – when listening to it – was how the album’s best moments are in the first half.

You have Dreams, Go Your Own Way and Don’t Stop near the top (Songbird in the opening half); The Chain is, debatably, the strongest cut on the second side. I was wondering whether the album would benefit from a slight rearrangement – the nerve of someone like me saying that! I feel The Chain is that huge song that you are exhausted after hearing it. It seems like a finale and the culmination of everything that has come before; the final chapter in the book and the bright and redemptive ending. How about having something as entrancing and spectral as Gold Dust Woman coming up behind Dreams (track three); shifting Never Going Back Again nearer the end?! There are two Buckingham songs in the opening trio of songs – Second Hand News and Never Going Back Again – with Dreams in the middle. I wonder whether Rumours starts too mellow and acoustic. Thinking with fresh eyes and I realise the tracklisting is spot-on! You could not have Gold Dust Woman that high because it is like the twilight and night coming in; Oh Daddy, just before it, is another sexy and alluring song; You Make Loving Fun another saucy and sexual song – it was written by Christine McVie and was about the lighting technician she was having an affair with (she was married to John McVie at the time).

The album is brilliant as it is and all the tracks are where they should be. Aside from Dreams; the first half of the record seems to be the daylight and the sort of awakening emotions and tensions that would have been present in the band; the latter half is the night and encroaching darkness – and all the tease, temptation and duplicity that comes with it. Ken Caillat and Richard Dashut produced with the band and, between them, the record was released to an unexpected audience in 1977. I have been thinking, if the tracks were in a different order, would our enjoyment be different?! We can argue whether the listing is perfect but I feel the emotional and sonic distribution is right. There is a stronger first half but the final songs are more brooding and deep – the bigger hits near the top and those detailed and nuanced songs at the end. If you were to randomly shuffle the songs then, even though they are the same songs, the listening experience would be vastly different, Imagine opening Rumours with You Make Loving Fun and then having The Chain; ending with the one-two of Dreams and Second Hand News?! You can quibble whether Rumours is the greatest album ever – there are some who claim it is – but one cannot deny how essential the flow and movement of the music is to the overall whole. A badly arranged record can be a disaster for a group...

Pop.jpg

Many felt U2’s Pop (1997) did not get as many great reviews as it did because its biggest songs were nearer the top. Although the band do not play the album’s songs anymore – and were dissatisfied with the final product – there are some who feel the record is too weird, bold and wild. Some critics felt it represented nadir and a lacking inspiration – it would be three years before U2 released All That You Can’t Leve Behind. I feel Pop fails because it is too scattershot and fragmented. Songs are all over the place and it as though the producers tried to make something as trippy and disconnected as possible. Spending more time with the band, and working out a more sensible and logical tracklisting, would have created a more cohesive and less abrasive album. An interesting article from Billboard asked whether we dispose of albums after a few song – how important it is to get the hits near the top:

…Such data suggests that the earlier a song appears on an album, the more likely a listener is to stream it. At the same time, a music consumer's attention span may be even shorter than any artist wants to believe. "Everyone's doing 20 different things at once: listening to music, watching TV, and probably while on their iPad," Rdio content marketing manager Kelli Fannon says. "When it comes to taking an hour to listen to an album in its entirety, I have all the best intentions in the world myself. But, ultimately, I can only get through the first three or four songs before the phone rings, or someone asks me a question, or I have a meeting I have to run to…

record.jpg

When the article used Mumford & Sons’ Babel as an example; this point was made:

The best lesson to take from studying albums' track sequences may be that even in an era of streaming, in which listener behavior seemingly reflects a tendency to sample only portions of releases, the album format appears to have a bright future. Per the Oct. 13 On-Demand Songs chart, the 11 cuts that debuted from Babel each totaled robust sums of between 555,000 and 330,000 on-demands streams, according to Nielsen BDS. Says Spotify chief content officer Ken Parks, "The fairly even distribution of listens across all the tracks on that record means that people are enjoying that music as a cohesive collection."

There are two points that we need to consider when thinking of modern albums and streaming: how people will digest an album when downloading and streaming it; how those who buy a physical product will view it. Musicians, when putting an album out today, often have to market it to two different audiences. Back when there were only vinyl and cassette options; the music had to fit on one a couple of sides. Artists knew how they wanted to end the first half before the listener flipped over the vinyl/tape. Not only was there no Internet but it was harder to skip forward a record or tape – the latter involved precise fast-forward and guessing when it came to locating specific songs!

edit.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Freepik

There are those who buy vinyl and C.D.s but more and more of us are getting our music through services like Spotify and Apple Music. Before I carry on with my piece; I have been reading a 2008 piece from The Guardian that brought A&R man Hugo Turquet into the argument – and asked about getting the order right and whether good sequencing was important...

According to Turquet, bands choose tracklistings themselves - aided by their manager - although they'll usually have heard a record company voice saying "we want the strong songs first". However, he warns against "front-loading" an album with big singles - if you play all your ace cards too early, the listener might not make it to the end - perhaps the reverse of the Fratellis.

Looking at a couple of classic albums, Turquet's formula seems about right. Nirvana's Nevermind opens with Smells Like Teen Spirit. Come As You Are and Lithium appear fairly early, and the strong kidnap-song Polly ends side one. The dark, lengthy Something In The Way similarly provides an epic album closer. Blur's Parklife also opens with smash hit Girls And Boys; the Phil Daniels-sung smash Parklife appears four tracks in, while the huge, melancholy ballad This Is A Low appears just before the end (the actual closer is the one minute long organ whirl Lot 105 - another occasional theme, the novelty-track ending).

ne.jpg

 The opener isn't always a big hit single. The Smiths' classic The Queen Is Dead opens with the rampaging title track ... but imagine it kicking off with the playful Vicar In A Tutu? The whole album just wouldn't have had the same momentum. Peter Hook of Joy Division and New Order - responsible for sequencing a fair few classic albums in their time, aided by manager Rob Gretton - compares choosing an album's track listing to pacing a live set. "Build up ... slow down ... with a big finish."

So do record labels ever intervene? According to Turquet, really heavy record company involvement only occurs when an artist asks them to, or submits something that is clearly disastrous.

"I've had people come in and they've forgotten to put the singles on the album," he says. "They used to do that in the 60s when singles sales were much bigger. Oasis didn't put Whatever on their album, but nowadays you're so desperate to sell albums you want everything on there."

And ideally, in the most artistically and commercially beneficial order. But perhaps bands like the Fratellis shouldn't get too hung up on sequencing. Downloading means it may soon be a dying art - we can cherry pick the tracks we want and, with iPods, order them how we like. I couldn't get a comment from the Fratellis camp to justify their selection, so took the liberty of shuffling Here We Stand around, making it ten minutes shorter and kicking off with Babydoll. I'm not sure if it's a classic, but I much prefer it”.

lib.jpg

There are some interesting points raised at it seems there are some universal truths. Those committing to listening to an entire album will want one of the strongest numbers at the top; the finest songs should not all be crammed near the start – there should be an equal distribution. You need to end with one of the stronger songs and ensure any similar-sounding numbers are not close together. In effect, you want to have an equally solid start and end but make sure you build up to a great finale. There are classic albums with a dodgy song on them – even The Beatles suffer that! – and it is important to make sure that song comes near the middle (so you are not disappointed early but build to an improvement). I have heard some incredible albums where there are some duff tracks nearer the top. Although The Libertines’ eponymous record was marred by fights and a band on the precipice of destruction; the music – like that on Rumours – is heightened because of the tensions and urgency in the studio. I am not sure how Don’t Be Shy made it onto that album to begin with - having it third in the running order takes a lot of wind out of the album. The fact The Man Who Would Be King arrives swiftly to restore order is no excuse. I wonder what the band was thinking and why they felt that song needed to be in there. I feel Don’t Be Shy should have been stuffed after tracks ten or eleven.

ist.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: iStock

One can debate whether terrific albums with a bad track should are ruined by that inclusion – or a simple rejig would have made that omissions forgivable – but I feel artists, if they have a bad track on their album, need to think about where it appears. The term ‘bad’ might be subjective but it is vital ensuring those big hits are not all together and near the start of an album. In an age where we are downloading/buying songs, as opposed to full albums, I wonder whether there are few records that hold attention from beginning to end. Bands/artists can put out an incredible set of songs but if the finest numbers are right at the end – and the attention has wandered before then – or the orgasm has come too soon; are people going to stick with streaming and handpick their favourite songs?! I feel this year’s best albums have been established as such because they have fantastic songs on them – but manage to arrange them perfectly so critics and fans are hooked right the way through. I come back to Rumours and realise what a different album it would have been was it not for a sage and sensible tracklisting. Having that genius on a record does not mean no matter what order the songs are in, it will be a success. Every classic album is capable of faltering for a number of reasons. I have heard some potential-great albums this year and they have been let down by their tracklisting and balance – packing all the best songs near the top and not considering listeners who want to listen to the album in one go! Even in a time when people are listening to albums in bits; unconventional ways and inorganically; it is paramount ever artist takes the trouble to get…

istc.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: iStock

THE sequencing just right.

FEATURE: Celebration and Resolutions: 2017’s Best and the Promise of 2018

FEATURE:

 

Celebration and Resolutions:

IDLES.jpg

 IN THIS PHOTO: IDLES/PHOTO CREDIT: Naomi Wood   

2017’s Best and the Promise of 2018

___________

I have spoken about the shift from Pop's mainstream…

JOR1.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Jorja Smith/PHOTO CREDITEbru Yildiz

dominance and a recognition of genres like Hip-Hop and Rap. Here; the Mercury Music Prize continued its eclectic and, at times, eccentric nominations (having Ed Sheeran and J Hus on the same list) whereas, a few days back, The Grammys brought out its nominations. There is a definite push, at the biggest award shows, to include black artists and genres that have to fight hard to silence the biggest Pop stars around. There is a long way to go in music – for award shows and creating equality – but I am hopeful more positive steps will be made. I would like to see women provided more opportunities and have their voices heard – there are still issues when it comes the male-female ratio of award nominees and festival headliners – and black artists kept in the spotlight. Away from the politics and discussions we could have; the problems that need to be addressed and positives that require conservation – it is worth noting all the good things that have come from music. Lorde released Melodrama earlier in the year and amazed me with its depths, addictiveness and quality. I was not expecting to fall for a great Pop album but I did – and have not looked back. The New Zealand songwriter has had an amazing year and created a fantastic record.

Lorde.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Lorde/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

There has been a raft of brilliant Hip-Hop/Rap albums this year and it seems the tone and nature of popular music is starting to shift. There is a split whereby polls such as BBC’s – and their tips of 2018’s best – are focusing on Pop whereas award shows and the mainstream seems to be welcoming and promoting Hip-Hop. It is interesting seeing this happen but I am excited to see this continue. We cannot keep the mainstream as it is and have to accept things will change. I am glad seeing artists like Jay-Z and Kendrick Lamar receive Grammy nominations. Jay-Z created a career-best album in 4:44; Kendrick Lamar is on a real roll and brought out the tremendous DAMN. earlier this year – an album that could top many critics’ end-of-year lists. I am amazed how many great Hip-Hop/Rap albums are coming and some of the newer examples. Princess Nokia has impressed me this year and produced wonderful singles – ABCs of New York is a song that shows what she is made of. Cardi B and SZA are artists who are two terrific black female artists who are primed to do great things in 2018 – the latter received a raft of Grammy nominations and has been courting press recently. I think this year has seen a shift from the rather commercial and bland Pop tastes – we can all name a few acts that fall into the category – and an awakening to the real and substantial music that is out there.

ken.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kendrick Lamar/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Of course, there are plenty of fake and hollow Pop stars continuing to get credit: their dominance and rise is starting to dwindle. I feel the finest albums of the year have been those from artists who pride musicianship and nuance over quick money and streaming figures. We are in a modern time but the greatest achievements from 2017 are those that nod to the past and preserve music’s traditions. From Kendrick Lamar and SZA to Jay-Z and Thundercat; it has been a great year for decent music. I have not even mentioned Thundercat and his exceptional album, Drunk. It is an ambitious, long and adventurous record that has graced many critics’ favourite albums of 2017 so far – BBC Radio 6 Music crowned it as such – and it shows what an extraordinary force he is. I cannot wait to see what he comes up with in the future but his current album is a gorgeous and soulful selection of songs that get into the heart and remain with you. That record was in my top-twenty and I am going to follow Thundercat’s career closely. In my top-ten have been records from Queens of the Stone Age, Dizzee Rascal and Robert Plant; Benjamin Clementine and Baxter Dury. There are some familiar faces in there but, the more I think about the best of this year, the more I revise my thoughts and wonder whether the likes of Thundercat should have been higher in my thoughts.

th.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Thundercat/PHOTO CREDITGetty Images

One of the best things from this year has been discovering new acts and hopefuls – from the radio and the course of my travels. I have discovered some great independent artists but there are radio-played acts that have caught my ear. Phoebe Bridgers and Jordan Rakei are two artists I am excited about; bands like Django Django (not new but still brilliant) are in my thoughts – IDLES are the guys that stand aside. The Bristol Punk/Alternative band was robbed of a Mercury Music Prize when their sensational Brutalism was unleashed on the world. I have been dubious regarding bands and how meaningful they have been this year. There are too many generic and predictable options who fail to bring the punch and wonder. IDLES are renowned for their fantastic live performances but you get a sense of what they are about on the album. It has been championed by a lot of D.J.s but I feel it has been denied by high-profile sources. I know the guys will continue to pervade and strike but I worry a genuine and forward-thinking band have been overlooked. They are among a small selection of groups who are original and have the potential to remain. Maybe it will take a little longer for the critical world to wake up but IDLES are not going away anytime soon.

phoebe.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

This year has been fantastic when it comes to the underground and the best of the new breed. I do not have time to put them all here, but I know there are some terrific acts coming through who will make a big difference in music. The best albums of this year are, perhaps, not as strong as last year’s but some wonderful L.P.s have been released. I am optimistic there are going to be sensational albums out next year and some further shifts. I am worried the band market is struggling but pleased genres like Hip-Hop and Rap have been pushed further towards the forefront. The mainstream has a few questionable acts gaining traction but the new Pop artists coming through seem to have more structure and promise than artists from previous years. It is going to be interesting seeing how the industry changes. I will provide my list of artists to watch in 2018 in a couple of weeks but there are some upcoming artists who, I feel, will be doing good things in 2018…

cam.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Camila Cabello/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

I will talk about the likes of Camila Cabello and how Pop music will shape up in 2018 but, reflecting my own thoughts, a few acts that have been tipped by Pitchfork. Jorja Smith is a name I am very familiar with and have been following her music for a long time now. Songs such as Blues Lights (which samples Dizzee Rascal’s Sirens) meant she was included in BBC Music’s Sound of 2016 rundown – and has made steps since then. There is something sensational and wonderful in her voice and, when looking at the piece she conducted with Pitchfork earlier this year - there were some interesting points that came out:

In the wake of the success of “On My Mind,” Smith says people keep asking her to make more upbeat tracks for the album, but she’s already made up her mind. “No, sorry,” she says unapologetically, answering a potential would-be opportunist. “Do you just want me to write an upbeat song because you want one?” Then again, it doesn’t mean we’ll never hear another uptempo track from Jorja Smith. “I’m not gonna just disappear after one album,” she says. “You’ve got a whole lot of time to hear more from me.”

jor2.jpg

PHOTO CREDITEbru Yildiz

There is a grounded and pragmatic personality inside Jorja Smith. She is a modern youth but not someone who is going to be guided by marketing forces and record label demands Her voice has a sultriness and seductive quality but there is toughness and direction. She has malleability and versatility that will see her continue to succeed and grow. When talking about labels; she was keen to express her independence:

It’s not even about what I don’t like. I just like what I’m doing right now without getting a label involved. So why would I change it at the moment when we’re doing well? I don’t want to mess up that structure just yet”.

I am pumped seeing where she head and how far she can go! It is clear she has driving ambition and does not want to be exploited and guided by labels. That determination and clear-sight will see her forge a unique path and rise to the mainstream. When she is there; I know she will exert a lot of pressure and influence the market. Remaining pure, focused and true is what goes into the music; it is how she comes across – and the way she wants to stay.

su.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sudan Archives/PHOTO CREDITKristyna Archer

Another star featured in Pitchfork’s rundown was Sudan Archives. She is a striking and tough figure who, earlier in the year, gave us the exceptional Time. It is clear the American artist has a lot of potential and, when the website were featuring her; they were struck by the complexities and qualities she possesses:

In person, Parks is sweeter than a line like that implies, but she’s no pushover. She’s model-thin with dancing eyes and natural curls, but her boho artistic sheen remains her most arresting quality. Sitting in a café in her current hometown of Los Angeles alongside a display case full of vegan, dried-fruit-studded pastries, she’s oblivious to any attention she attracts as she pours fresh-squeezed orange juice over ice”.

There are a few great newcomers that have the potential to ascend from their home nations and make it internationally. Sudan Archives captivates with her fashion and looks; her personality explodes and bursts with colours and exotic scents. She has such an alluring and wonderful aura; you gravitate towards her without a word being sung. I am interesting seeing where she goes and how her career shapes up in 2018. The material she has released so far has been instilled with her variegated D.N.A. and exceptional voice. It comes from someone who is modest and rather humble:

su2.jpg

PHOTO CREDITKristyna Archer

In fact, at this point, with her music gaining more praise and fans with each passing week, Parks is a bit shellshocked. “I didn’t expect people to take it so positively. I felt like I was gonna be more misunderstood than anything, ’cause that’s how it’s always been,” she says. “I wasn’t the kid that was lonely, but sometimes I felt like a ghost.”

YC.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: YXNG Bane/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

YXNG Bane is a rapper from the East End and has gained attention following his remix of Ed Sheeran’s Shape of You. He broke through with his single, Rihanna, and has been included in the BBC’s list of acts to watch next year. He is new to the industry but it seems like he has potential to go far and make some headway. He knows Rap music needs to compete with the best of the U.S. – our finest artists cannot compete with the range and quality of America. YXNG Bane is hoping to bring a sense of purpose to the scene, and with it, a confidence boost that has been missing. We have Grime/Rap stars like Skepta, Stormzy and Dizzee Rascal but there is a need breed emerging. I am keen to see what he can come up with and how far he can go in the industry. It is always hard being part of a list that promotes the best new artists of the year – having to prove that place and make some quick moves. The young rapper will not hurry into releases: he has been building a following and is one of those performers to keep an eye out for.

taya.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Tayá  /PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

There are some great female Pop artists who could come into the same league as Lorde – rather than the more lifeless and commercial brand. Ashe is someone I have proffered a lot and has had her vocals approved by D.J./production duo Louis the Child. There are many ears turning her way and it seems like 2018 is an important one for her. Used to It, her catchy single from this year, matches controversial and provocative verses with thudding and singalong choruses. It is a classic Pop slice that has turned many heads. I have mentioned Camila Cabello (pictured above) as someone who could make moves and breaks next year. Tayá was discovered aged thirteen after attending a local choir; the Liverpool singer-songwriter has spent the past few years perfecting her music and is a bold artist who is ready to break into the mainstream. When Ur Sober, a collaboration with fellow Yxng Bane, shows what a turbulent emotional time she has had! She went on to support Zara Larsson and is someone who can fit into a packed Pop market – alongside the more credible options. Camila Cabello, with her hit song Havana, amazed critics and it has converted many to Pop. It has some exotic flair and Cuban heels; sassiness and sweat; a sway and punch that means its depths and contrasts make it more appealing and long-lasting than many songs out there!

cam2.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Camila Cabello/PHOTO CREDIT: Camia Cabello

Two other female artists who could make some big moves are Billie Eilish and IAMDDB. They are both on BBC’s Longlist of artists to watch in 2018 and with good reason: both have created sensational music and have a distinct personality. Manchester’s IAMDDB was taught Jazz by her father and had a six-month stay in Angola – she returned to the U.K. with a scattershot musicianship and exposure to African sounds. She has been compared to SZA and the best female artists out there. Maybe there is a bit of Jazz and Soul here and there but the most interesting aspect of her music is the installation and distribution of international flows and beats – there are bits of Africa and Europe working alongside one another. I know she will continue to get attention and her music will reach new heights. It is great to see a fantastic British artist take her own path and not follow the herd. I expect her to cement her reputation and continue to compel and entrance. A tough and confidently artist whose attitude and boldness do not get in the way of quality and likeability – she is an artist who captures the heart but takes no nonsense from anyone!

IAM.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: IAMDDB/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Billie Eilish is a young star but someone who is already assured and making moves. Not only does she have the ears and eyes of critics; she is shaping up to be one of the most respectable and inspiring artists coming through. I have mentioned Phoebe Bridgers – who has a different slant and take – but they are both young artists who take control of their music and look set to put their stamp on 2018’s music. I wonder whether her young years (she is fifteen) means that pressure and expectation could weight quite heavily. I know she will overcome and is a stunning songwriter who is starting to get the respect and pulpit she warrants. I shall end things there but that is only a tip of what is to come. I will reveal my series of artists to watch in 2018 – worth watching that for more depth and a greater range. I feel 2018’s Pop will start to change and welcome in female artists with depth and genuinely ability; Soul, World and R&B artists bringing something fresh to music – alongside a raft of hungry Rap/Hip-Hop stars, from the U.K. and U.S., challenging for acclaim. There are voices that wonder where the next big Rock and Alternative sounds will come from. In all the lists of artists to watch and be aware of; I am not sure if there are that many great bands being heralded. I think you could write a piece called No False IDLES and assess the Bristol band on their own terms. They are among the groups that will be worth following next year. There will be others but it seems solo artists are going to be bigger names in 2018 – the best albums of this year (aside from IDLES and Queens of the Stone Age) have been solo-based. I am excited to see how 2018 unfolds but we are all catching our breath right now. It certainly has been…

billie.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Billie Eilish/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

A terrific year for music!

FEATURE: BBC Music Sound of 2018: Should We Be Excited?

FEATURE:

 

BBC Music Sound of 2018:

BILLIE.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Billie Eilish/ALL PHOTOS: Getty Images 

Should We Be Excited?

___________

THE BBC has announced their annual list of…

BBC.jpg

artists that, they feel, will make a big impression in the coming year. I am not usually one who spectates and strokes the chin with intrigue but this year is slightly different. There are few of the bland and forgettable artists that occupy the longlist. In past years, I have been tired by artists like Rag'n'Bone Man and their like – the type you know will sink without a trace before you know it. I will conclude this piece with a playlist of all sixteen artists included on the longlist. I am not surprised by some of the conclusions but there are a couple that raises eyebrows. This year’s glitterati included artists from Rap, R&B; Indie, Dance and Pop. There are fewer Grime/Urban artists than last year: a move towards something more conventional and Pop-based. The BBC’s list of the ‘ones to watch’ in 2018 was compiled by 173 critics, broadcasters, D.J.s and music industry figures – the winner is set to be announced on 12th January on BBC Radio 1. British rappers Not3s and Xyng Bane are on the same list as Indie artists Sam Fender and Pale Waves; Scandinavian singers ALMA and Sigrid; U.S. Pop singer Billie Eilish; Jade Bird and Rex Orange County are intriguing names to watch closely...

ALMA.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: ALMA

Much has been made of the fact Eilish, at fifteen, is the youngest inclusion on the lauded list – the youngest artist to ever appear on the BBC survey. The superannuation we see announced this time of the year is designed to guide us to the sort of sounds/artists who will be making waves in the coming year. It is always hard, with only sixteen acts, striking a balance when it comes to gender and genres. This year sees a large representation of female artists and a nice spread among Pop, Rap and other areas of music – there are absences and omissions. Recent years have featured very few Rock bands and groups in general. There is the tendency to put the spotlight on solo artists - but I wonder whether there are enough great Rock/Alternative acts that genuinely deserve a place on a list like this – or whether there is a problem and surfeit that needs addressing. I was interested when the BBC Music Sound of… came out last year and the artists included. I was pleased RAY BLK was crowned the winner but she has been a little slow out of the blocks. Others on that list such as Jorja Smith (4th) have fared better and been more prolific. Rag'n'Bone Man was second and, to my mind, has failed to live up any expectations; he should not have been placed that high!

tom.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Tom Walker

Others, further down the list, like Maggie Rogers and Declan McKenna have produced stronger works and deserved to be on the Shortlist. It is always hard predicting how people will react but the best things that came out of the list (last year) was the fact four of the five shortlisted acts were black women – the winner included. ALMA is a neon-haired artist who, on Phases (ft. French Montana), created a quality slice of Pop that can sit with the better efforts of this year. She has potential to sustain next year but I hope to see more variation from her. I feel the same when hearing someone like Tom Walker. He is too close in tone to Rag'n'Bone Man and I wonder whether his inclusion was a reaction to the placing he got last year – I can find little to distinguish between the two. Both artists are lower down my favoured list but, if they make smart decisions next year, they could create some headway. We have artists who unite Punk attitude with bright hair and panache (GIRLI among them) - so I am not confident ALMA will do too much in 2018...I might be wrong. The BBC has always been a little guilty of repeating itself when it comes to artists: this year sees a Rag'n'Bone Man clone and Superorganism – a band who have failed to really spark anything in me and, with Something for Your M.I.N.D., a song that did not really distinguish itself from everything out there.

IAMDDB.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: IAMDDB

Billie Eilish is coming into a packed and competitive Pop market but the fact she is turning heads at such a young age means she has that early advantage. Her music is dark and playful but there is maturity and command throughout. I am genuinely excited and think she has the potential to be a genuine contender when it comes to next year’s big artists. Let’s hope she gets in the top-three of the BBC Music Sound of 2018 list – maybe the number-one spot would not be out of the question?! She will have stiff competition from Sigrid who is among the most-loved and recommend artists I have heard – so many artists I interview name-check her as one to watch closely. Strangers is her recent single and a fresh and scintillating slice of Pop. She is not an ordinary artist and her music, once heard, really get under the skin. I know she will be a huge prospect in 2018 and someone guaranteed to make the Shortlist. Even if she does not win the BBC Music Sound of 2018; her career will fly and flourish. Other acts on the list like IAMDDB – despite the slightly odd name – has Jazz-Soul blends and a sultry voice. I feel she will get a record deal and play some of the best venues in London; record a successful album and gather a following internationally. Jade Bird puts her spin on Americana and is someone who can naturally succeed on both sides of the Atlantic. I am looking down the list of BBC-nominated artists and feel there are only a few (Superorganism and ALMA among them) artists who will not really make huge strides.

nots3.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Not3s

Not3s is someone I am already familiar with and the playful M.C. might struggle to finish in the medal positions – considering the heavy collection of Rap/Urban artists last year; the desire to embrace new artists this year. There are seven solo female artists in the list of sixteen; of the two groups, there is a fair proportion of women – it is another inclusive and balanced list that does not provide dominance to the boys! I have neglected Pale Waves so far but feel they will challenge Sigrid and Billie Eilish for the victory. The Manchester quartet is among a few bands who are genuinely exciting and promising. I have been a bit cold with regards bands and feel there aren’t many that stay in the mind and offer anything different to what’s out there. The remainder of artists mixes the House innovation of Yaeki – someone who has been tipped by artists I interview – and rising R&B star, Khalid. It is hard to say, until the artists start releasing new material, which will race ahead and those that might take a bit longer. Unlike recent years; I can see some clear stars already formed. You do not have to wait to know Billie Eilish and Sigrid will make impressions this year; Pale Waves have the chance to big festivals draws. Should we be excited by this BBC Longlist?

palew.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Pale Waves

I feel there is a lot to recommend and we should be interested and invested this time. Maybe you have been a bit sceptical and wary of previous BBC lists and proclamations. It is their opinion so will have debate and detractors but, in the past, we have seen big stars like Adele (and) Florence + The Machine come from that fire – go on to succeed and build a huge career. It is a fantastic platform and boost that most artists envy. I have picked my favourite but I think, unlike last year, the winner of BBC Music Sound of 2018 will be a Pop artist, probably a woman, and either be American or Scandinavian. I think British talent will get a look in but the top positions will be filled with the best new female talent. The next few weeks will see the sixteen artists included on the Longlist make new moves and campaign. I cannot wait to see who is revealed the winner and, as 2018 starts, which of the artists stands aside from the pack. There is always controversy and unexpected conclusions but this year, I feel there is a lot more promise and variation on the BBC’s Sound of… rundown. Whatever your opinions on this year’s selected artists to watch; it is clear there will be a few name likely to…

SIGRID.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sigrid

IMPACT popular music in a significant way.

FEATURE: The Grammy Awards Nominations: Are Music Award Ceremonies Still Relevant?

FEATURE:

 

The Grammy Awards Nominations:

kend2.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kendrick Lamar/PHOTO CREDIT: Paola Kudacki/GQ

Are Music Award Ceremonies Still Relevant?

___________

THE never-ending parade of music awards and…

grammy.jpg

ALL PHOTO CREDITS (unless stated otherwise): Getty Images

polls mean barely a month goes by where we are immune to the latest ‘big event’. In the next few weeks; we will get the nominations and shortlisted albums of 2017: earlier in the year, we had the Mercury Music Prize; various award ceremonies and festival announcements. It has been a busy and frenetic year for music but one that has sparked debate and controversy. We have, now, the nominations for the Grammy Awards. One of the biggest bugbears over recent years has been the ethnic breakdown and eclecticism of award shows.

Billboard.jpg

There is always accusation these ceremonies are reserved for white, mainstream artists: it is not helped by the lack of fervency and change among the committees. Those charged with ordering nominations and selecting the panel are failing to notice how few black artists are being recognised. The issue not only limits itself to race. I find there has always been that dependence on Pop and Rock; recognising those who make waves in the charts – the YouTube/Spotify darlings who hold huge commercial sway. This is a problem that goes beyond award ceremonies and the like – we can see it crop up in every crevice and corner of the music industry. Call it racism or homogenisation: changes have to be made in order to create parity and a less discriminatory industry.

444.jpg

It is back to the Grammys and a breath of change in the wind. I shall provide my views, but here is how BBC summed up the nominations for the Grammys.

Jay Z and Kendrick Lamar are the main contenders for the 60th annual Grammy Awards, leading a crop of nominations that is heavy on hip-hop and R&B but has left mainstream pop stars like Ed Sheeran and Lady Gaga out of the running for the major prizes.

IN THIS PHOTO: Lady Gaga/PHOTO CREDIT:  Tiffany & Co

The awards will be announced at New York's Madison Square Garden on 28 January 2018, and will be screened on 4 Music the following evening”.

I will come and look at other standouts from the nominations but, in the question I posed at the top of this feature, are award ceremonies like the Grammys relevant and all-inclusive? This year’s greater incorporation of black artists has been a welcomed relief – should this have happened decades ago?! It should, of course, but at least there has been an understanding of a big issue that was going unaddressed. In the past twenty years, only two black artists have won the Grammys’ main prize, Album of the Year. Beck nabbed it from Beyoncé two years back (her superior, self-titled record was robbed) whereas Adele did the same earlier this year – few would argue she has a stronger record than Beyoncé. (Although her record, 25, was released in 2015: it went on to win the Grammy in 2017!).

beys.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Beyoncé/PHOTO CREDIT: Paola Kudacki (TIME)

The illogical and narrow-minded viewpoint has had to expand and alter. Artists like Frank Ocean and Drake have withdrawn their albums from potential nomination – fearing cultural bias would count against them. Race is an issue that is making award ceremonies somewhat redundant and reductive. The indigenous whites-and-Pop-only sphere of the Grammys has been challenged and confronted. You cannot deliberately impose amendments and codification that mandates a percentage of the music included (in the nominations) has to be from black musicians – that would be pandering and less to do with positive discrimination.

adele.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Adele

The problem is this: the facts speak for themselves in this matter. In 2016; Beyoncé’s Lemonade was the darling of the critical world; scoring universal acclaim and lauded as a career-high for the R&B inspiration – even Adele, in her Grammy acceptance speech, recognised the power and potency of Lemonade. Frank Ocean, Drake and Kendrick Lamar have featured high – from 2016/2017 – in the upper reaches of public/critical celebration. I know the Grammys are not the byword for popularity and common sense – they have always carried a certain sense of predictability and discrimination. It is good to see Rap and Hip-Hop being recognised – at last! – by an awards ceremony that has relied too heavily on white artists and commercial genres. The fact it has taken so many years for change (slight as it is) to come about means we need to look at the award ceremonies around the world and ask if they are muddying the waters.

tay.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Taylor Swift

Awards are there to recognise the best from that year in music: critical nominations and reviews should, you’d think, mirror those selections. If critics are raving about Hip-Hop, Beyoncé and black artists then why would a major award ceremony turn its nose and ignore that?! Artists like Taylor Swift and Ed Sheeran – I will come to them soon – have always formed the basis of events like the Grammys. It seems like there is that need to bow to the big record labels and bosses. Maybe, if their prestigious and high-paid artists are not given the gong, then that would be a snub and tragic oversight. I can only imagine what happens behind-the-scenes when it comes to nominations and decisions – one feels there is a degree of chicanery and corruption. Looking at the British award shows (we have our share) and there is no less discrimination and controversy.

mer.jpg

I looked at the Mercury Music Prize list and, although I am glad a talented black artist won the award, it seemed like this shift has, like the Grammys, come about after public pressure and a sobering wake-up call.  Sampha, J Hus and Loyle Carner were among the talented, black artists who put their stamp on R&B, Soul and Hip-Hop. I will address genre, soon, but I was aggrieved there were few female nominees; some odd, left-field selections (Ed Sheeran being nominated) were in there. I know award shows need to keep fresh and reflect the tastes of the general public.

Jay.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Jay-Z

If they do not evolve and remain fresh then they can be accused of being labelled ‘dinosaurs’ and stubborn. I agree with that point but change and development need to be aware of the nature of racism, sexism and rigidity.  I am humbled and pleased the top-nine most-nominated artists of 2018’s Grammys are non-white performers. Lorde is the only Pop artist to be included on the list. Melodrama is a phenomenal record and one that is caught in a quandary: if it loses, many will scratch their heads (as it gained huge applause); if it wins then it will make a mockery of the more-inclusive breakdown of this year’s nominations. Neil Portnow, the Chief Executive of the National Academy of Arts & Science – which runs the Grammys – provided his take on the shift towards recognising black artists: "…a really terrific reflection of the voting membership of the Academy".

lorde.jpg

IN THIS IMAGE: The album cover for Lorde's Melodrama

Striking the balance between racial equality and logic is hard to achieve, I admit. You cannot nominate artists because of the colour of their skin: you can definitely not exclude them for that same reason. This year sees Bruno Mars nominated for 24K Magic; Jay-Z for 4:44 and Kendrick’s DAMN. get a nod in the Album of the Year category – Lorde’s Melodrama is in the minority in terms of race and genre! There is no excuse for the baffling minority of black artists in previous years: the fact 2018’s main categories are much more pragmatic proves quality and depth is being favoured over commercialism and the Pop charts.

ken.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kendrick Lamar

In the past; I would say the bigger award ceremonies have been irrelevant and a waste of time – if they are not going to synchronise with critical reviews then it shows there is a split and lack of common sense in the industry. We have specialist music awards in the U.K. but there is still work to be done. Q’s annual award ceremony is still too focused on Pop and white artists; NME are a little stiff and unwavering when it comes to genres; the Mercury Music Prize is too London-centric. There are always going to be people disappointed and speaking out. It is a lack of consistency that troubles me most. All music awards should reflect quality and nothing else – regardless of genre, gender and race.

gram.jpg

So many ceremonies have raised questions around exclusion and homogenisation; whether that be a lack of female faces or an overly-white outlook. The Grammy Awards have a long way to go until they regain a semblance of authority and balance but the nominations for next year’s hand-outs looks far brighter. Another of the notable discussion points – when looking at this year’s Grammy nominations – is the diminished role of Pop and Rock. Taylor Swift and Ed Sheeran are names one would normally see dominating award shows elsewhere. They have missed out on all the major categories and, with it, given the focus to other genres...

ed.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Ed Sheeran

Despite the fact there are plenty of categories on offer – a musical Oscars, it seems – there is a shift is tastes, it appears. I have mooted whether music awards are true to the tastes of the public and what importance they hold. Whilst I argue having a Grammy, Brit or MOBO (less so with this one) does not make you better than anyone else out there – and can often be the result of record labels and corporations ensuring their best-paid acts are happy – I think the step forward for the Grammys should be the start of things to come. In the past, I would have argued that such a high-profile award show, in the way it limits its scope and promotes those acts with a greater commercial appeal, are worthless.

alb.jpg

This year (2018, in terms of the prize-giving), where they are going for quality, it seems the penny has dropped. Not only are the best and most celebrated records given their due; there are more black artists nominated. With a positive shift towards Hip-Hop/Rap and black artists sees other issues arise. Some have commented how Rock has been ignored, to an extent. Big players like Queens of the Stone Age have not featured heavily but that is more to do with the lack of big Rock bands this year – not really producing albums to challenge the best out there. There are sub-categories that cater to most genres - so it is not as though people will miss out.

lorde.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Lorde/PHOTO CREDIT: Andrew Whitton

At least one Country performer is recognised in their best album of the year sector: for 2018’s Grammy, there is no Country album in the main categories. Again, one must make way for other genres to take their place. There has to be a cut-off but I think other award shows should take guidance from the Grammys. Pitchfork raised an issue about the lack of women nominated this year:

The Big Four are the guts and glory of the Grammys, and everyone knows it. But only a fifth of the nominations across those categories this year go to female artists: Lorde, Julia Michaels, SZA, and Alessia Cara. It is true that 2017 has been a truly rough one for women on the charts, and it’s hard to expect more from the Grammys than glorified chart watching. But couldn’t y’all have at least slipped “Bodak Yellow,” the year’s record smasher of a hit, into the Big Four? SZA’s spectacular debut CTRL for the album nod?

bodak.jpg

That said, it seems like Lorde has a real chance for the AOTY win, just in terms of voting politics. The Grammys love a wunderkind. Four of the last 10 AOTY winners have been young, white pop singer-songwriters mining matters of the heart and the self. And the two strongest competitors—Kendrick and JAY-Z—could split votes that sway hip-hop. (Plus, you know, Melodrama is a good album.)”.

They noted a few discrepancies in categories where The War on Drugs was in the Rock album section – strange for a band not renowned for their grittiness and strings – whereas The National are scrapping it out in the Alternative list. Popular chart acts are being relegated whilst there are some notable omissions in terms of Rock albums – some lesser-known artists, who released minor L.P.s, given the nod instead.

cardi b.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Cardi B

Rolling Stone highlighted the rise of R&B and how it is replacing the hegemony of Pop:

This summer, Nielsen published a report demonstrating that hip-hop and R&B had passed rock as the most-consumed music in America for the first time, largely due to streaming. That appears to have gotten Grammy voters' attention, as least for now: The most prestigious Grammy categories (Song/Record/Album of the Year) were dominated by streaming success stories, whether it was Luis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee's "Despacito" (over 4 billion views on YouTube) or Childish Gambino's "Redbone" (338 million streams on Spotify). The only exception to the rule in the major cross-genre categories was Lorde's Melodrama, which was not a massive streaming success”.

war.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: The War on Drugs

There are still cracks to address when it comes to the categories and demographics of the Grammy nominations. If the sudden decline of Pop and Rock means the predicted artists are without kudos and spotlight; that might be a reaction to the need for more black artists having their music featured. Even if Taylor Swift, and Reputation, gathered big reviews;  it seems there is that desire to move from the mainstream Popstars, who have always dominated, and towards artists usually ignored. One can question the worth and value of an award like a Grammy but a lot of reservation and dubious tutting has arrived from the underwhelming artists featured and the lack of certain genres/races featured – and the endless categories, I guess! I feel the Grammys, as the biggest award ceremony in music, needs to set an example. One of the reasons many other awards lack substance is because of the quality/balance issue – putting charts and Popstars above the genuinely great and acclaimed.

kend.jpg

The Grammys have shown favour to artists who have accrued huge streaming figures (on Spotify) but I look at albums by Kendrick Lamar and Jay-Z and they address the state of modern America. In a time of ‘fake news’ and President Trump’s endless reign of idiocy: it seems the importance of truth-telling artists from Hip-Hop are being given a platform. That need for a truthful, straight-talking musical presidency is one that reflects the public and critics’ desires. There is a lot more to pore over with regards the Grammys and whether enough is being done - but one of the best ways for them to salvage a semblance of respect and standing was to turn away from the white Pop market and towards Hip-Hop. It is a long time coming but I feel, if this is a sign of what is to come; it is a hugely important step towards…

SZA.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: The most-nominated woman in this year's Grammys rundown, SZA/PHOTO CREDIT: Mambu Bayoh

MAKING music award shows inspiring and vital.

FEATURE: Stocking Thrillers: Great Gifts for Music Lovers

FEATURE:

 

Stocking Thrillers:

santa.jpg

 PHOTO CREDITIconica

Great Gifts for Music Lovers

___________

IT can’t just be the men…

wrap.jpg

who will leave things to the last moment! The traditional mentality to panic-buy and wait until Christmas Eve results in some rather questionable and thoughtless gift. Music lovers demand presents a little more personal, impressive and appropriate. With that in mind; a collection of confections – various-prized gifts – that will satisfy your music-obsessed friend/family member.

There should be, in this stuffed and stocked list, something that tickles the fancy; a present that would be perfect for a music fan in your life – and, with a few weeks remaining – plenty of time to get your order in!

IMAGE/PHOTO CREDITS (unless stated otherwise): Getty Images

___________

A U.S.B. Mix-Tape

new mix.jpg

Still here are the days when romance can be measured by a mixtape! It is a great gift for music fans that prefer their sounds/technology a little older and vintage – the look of a cassette with the attached dongle. It looks great and means you can put their favourite sounds on to the memory stick; hand it over and watch their eyes light – or let them choose their own tracks.

Buy: https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/261927693/4gb8gb16gb-usb-mixtape-retro?ref=listing-shop-header-2

Sia -  Everyday is Christmas

sia.jpg

The Australian Popstar departs from her confidence and electric songwriter to something tenderer and Christmas-flavoured. Written with Greg Kurstin; this is a collection of modern Christmas songs that are guaranteed to warm the cockles and get the family singing – and are actually pretty decent songs for those who dislike the cheese of Christmas tracks.

Buy: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/everyday-is-christmas/1299289839

Music-Themed Chocolate Bars

chocs.jpg

The Balance says it best:When you're starting a food business, you can start out with a plan to either appeal to as many people as possible. Or, you can decide to focus in on a group of people to create products that also, perhaps, tie into your own interests or dietary needs. Within one year, several candy businesses caught my eye as it turned out they were all targeted to the same type of consumer: music and entertainment lovers seeking fun gifts”.

Buy: https://www.thebalance.com/chocolate-gifts-for-music-lovers-1326118

Spire Studio Portable Recording Studio

spire.png

It is a pricey one for the stocking but a sure-fire winner for any serious musician and producer. It is available via U.K. sites – and should arrive from the U.K. in time for Christmas – and is an all-in-one studio for those who prefer convenience and affordability. As Spire put it: “Record studio-quality sound without the hassle of cables. Instantly edit, mix, and share your recorded songs via a built-in Wi-Fi connection between Spire Studio and the free, Spire app for iOS. Whether capturing a moment of inspiration or collaboration with bandmates, Spire delivers a new kind of recording experience”.

Buy: https://www.spire.live/en/spire-studio.html

Personalised Song Lyric Print

personalised song.jpg

Surprise the music-lover in your life with a framed and personalised print. You can capture their favourite song lyrics in a gift that is sure to give them satisfaction. Whether they are a Rock or Pop fan; you can give them something that is meaningful and special to them.

Buy: https://www.thedriftingbear.com/products/personalised-song-lyrics-print?variant=18419060548

Roli Seaboard Block

roli.jpg

It is a perfect and lightweight keyboard for those who want to create quick and easy sounds on-the-go – or those who want to sit at home and craft something. The manufacturers say: “Create astonishingly expressive music on a portable, super-powered keyboard. Touch and shape your sound on Seaboard Block's soft, pressure-responsive musical surface. Play a powerful standalone instrument — and extend its power by connecting to other Blocks”.

Buy: https://roli.com/products/blocks/seaboard-block

The Beatles Anthology (Hardback or Softback)

hardback.jpg

They sang about paperback writers – can’t remember which song it was! – and, here, you can discover how the band got together and why their music creates a timeless joy! It is filled with fantastic and never-seen-before photos and, although the book is a few years old, its relevance and place will never date. I am ordering it for Christmas and feel like it is an essential purchase for fans of The Beatles – and those discovering them for the first time.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Beatles-Anthology/dp/0811826848/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1512220345&sr=8-4

Fender Monterey Bluetooth Speaker

speaker.jpg

Another pricey gift but a high-end speaker that delivers exceptional performance. GAK provided their capsule review of the product: “Powerful and packed with music-friendly features, the Monterey Bluetooth Speaker makes it easy to bring Fender’s classic stage-ready style, performance and sound to your home, office or dorm room. Designed in Southern California, with a look inspired by our classic amplifiers, the Monterey brings Fender’s famously clear sound to streaming music and phone calls. The Monterey channels 120W of power into a pristine quad-driver system; two woofers and two tweeters are precisely matched to”.

Buy: http://www.richtonemusic.co.uk/products/fender_monterey_bluetooth_speaker.asp?gclid=CjwKCAiAu4nRBRBKEiwANms5W_m5q9-jjosluV9QT8keLmjJRvTlGkOnu25sQqR3HuZjc3GXhKy-xhoCCnUQAvD_BwE

StuHub Gift Card

@StubHub.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: @StubHub

This is a nice, easy gift for those who love their gigs. It works like any gift card and can be pre-loaded with various denominations. It is hard affording gigs these days so this is a nice option for anyone who has plans for next year’s big gigs – and needs that financial help to make it a reality.

Buy: https://www.stubhub.com/gift-cards/

FiiO X1-II Media Player

Fiio.jpg

This is how Headphone.com sees this incredible piece of technology: “The newly updated - and extremely affordable - high resolution digital media player FiiO X1-II has arrived at headphone.com. This 'second generation' X1-II player / DAP from FiiO now includes awesome wireless Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity, a tidy touch scroll wheel, improved DAC and headphone amp circuitry plus a cool new look with streamlined navigation and design improvements”.

Buy: https://www.headphone.com/products/fiio-x1-ii-media-player

Personalised Headphone Stand by MijMoj Design

stand.jpg

This is something I could do with! Make sure your headphones are given a comfortable place to rest this Christmas! Not only that but you can have this stand personalised – either a great gift for a music fan you know; perhaps it is something you want to treat yourself to!

Buy: https://www.notonthehighstreet.com/mijmoj/product/personalised-headphone-stand

Wax & Stamp Subscription

@waxandstamp.png

This is a brilliant idea for anyone looking to get their vinyl-lover a great gift. Why is this such a sought-after gift, then? Set up by two friends, Wax & Stamp is a real labour of love. Two records will land on your doorstep each month- one chosen by Wax & Stamp and the other by a guest selector (think DJs, record label heads and artists). By the end of the year you’ll have 24 new releases to add to your record collection. Their focus is on new music, so if you’re looking for a classic, this probably isn’t the answer. However, if you want to keep abreast of the latest news in music but find the choice overwhelming, this will give you a helping hand”.

Buy/Register: http://www.waxandstamp.com/

David Bowie - A New Career in a New Town

Bowie.jpg

Keep the master close to your heart with this fantastic gift. This is how Rolling Stone sees it: “No period in David Bowie's career is more curious than the trilogy of albums he recorded in the late Seventies while living in Berlin's artsy Schöneberg district. They're defiantly uncommercial, stacking soundtrack-y, atmospheric soundscapes alongside pop songs, and they're bizarrely endearing – "The hin-ter-land, the hin-ter-land/We're gonna sail to the hinterland," goes one catchy-yet-strange passage in Lodger's "Red Sails." Stranger yet maybe, this era produced one of his most enduring hits, the anthemic "Heroes," which has been covered by everyone from Oasis to Peter Gabriel and Janelle Monáe. The period, defined by Bowie's collaborations with Brian Eno, was so far-out (even for the former spaceman) that it frustrated his record label and caused a slight dip in his popularity (all of his albums from this period have yet to be certified even gold), though the tales of Bowie's drug-and-alcohol-fueled romps with Iggy Pop and musical experimentation at the time have become the subject of multiple books. Now a new box set, A New Career in a New Town (1977 – 1982), is offering a freshly polished look at the time. It contains 1977's brilliant and sprawling Low and "Heroes" LPs, 1978's live outing Stage, 1979's avant-rock experiment Lodger and 1980's only slightly poppier Scary Monsters (and Super Creeps), the last of which, recorded in New York, was intended as a return to commercialism, though it still reads like fractured pop”.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Career-Town-1977-1982/dp/B073NXBYP6

Chromecast Audi

chromecast.jpg

You can easily cast music to your speakers and enjoy music without interruption; it is compatible with Android, Windows and iOS and means you can listen to your favourite tracks wherever you go

Buy: https://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/tv-and-home-entertainment/digital-and-smart-tv/smart-tv/google-chromecast-audio-10137628-pdt.html

Numark PT01 Touring Vintage Suitcase Turntable

nurmark.jpg

This is a nice and well-priced turntable that should be top of the Christmas list! The manufacturers list it like this: “The Numark PT Touring turntable is a classically-styled suitcase unit that recalls the popular portable turntables from the past. PT Touring has a rugged case with a handle so you can carry it anywhere. It plays all your 33 1/3, 45 and 78 RPM records, comes with a 45 RPM adapter, and it has built-in stereo speakers for convenient listening without needing to connect external speakers. In addition, it has RCA outputs for simple connection to home audio equipment and a convenient Auto-Stop feature kicks in when it reaches the end of the record. Plus with its USB port, included USB cable and downloadable EZ Vinyl/Tape Converter software, converting analog records into digital files for archiving on your computer is a snap. PT Touring far surpasses the old suitcase turntables in versatility, however. It can also operate on its own built-in rechargeable battery—which means you can enjoy your records even if you’re not near a wall plug”.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Numark-PT01-Touring-Headphones-Conversion/dp/B015FJZZZA

Musician Tree Ornmanets

artists.jpg

This is an American site but, if you think the tree is lacking that certain something; get onto their site and order your favourite musicians in decoration-form! These ornaments will make you the envy of all your mates – and lend your festive tree a special look and swagger.

Buy: http://www.mlinehamart.com/

A Classic Band Poster

classic posters.jpg

A vintage poster of your loved one's favourite band is a thoughtful gift and one that will live with them forever. As we get more and more involved with the digital tide: it is nice to have a retro slice of music heritage hanging on the wall!

Buy: https://www.classicposters.com/

Personalised Favourite Song Lyric Soundwave Print

soundwave.jpg

This is another great gift – like the personalised lyric one – that allows a single moment of music to be captured in a frame. It can be your choice moment from that favourite song – a gift that shows thought and will be appreciated and enjoyed by the music-lover in your life.

Buy: https://www.soundviz.com/?gclid=CjwKCAiAu4nRBRBKEiwANms5W8h5cN2Nfn0cZNy6LQmEkip5frAuIEdOcW0SqnW0iEwCgnZPzQm9lxoCJ-sQAvD_BwE

Amazon Echo Dot

Echo.jpg

Trusted Reviews tells you why you need this in your life:  “AI assistants are the future, and every home ought to have one right now. They are capable of making your life so much easier, and al you need is to speak out commands and ask for basic information. No longer do you need to take out your smartphone just to perform basic tasks. Right now in the UK, the Amazon Echo is the closest we get to this without stepping into Terminator territory. The only problem with the Echo is that it will prove a little too big and expensive for some. Enter the Amazon Echo Dot – a smaller and more affordable alternative. The Echo Dot offers almost everything the larger Echo does, but for a third of the price. It also adds some crucial features such as Bluetooth and 3.5mm output, which weren’t available before”.

Buy: http://www.argos.co.uk/product/6349693

Public Enemy Action Figures

Public Enemy.jpg

What do you mean you don’t need Public Enemy action figures?! Even if you are not a fan of the legendary Hip-Hop crew, this is a seriously original idea! Have Chuck D and crew in your life always with this stunning set of figures – with the members of Public Enemy looking at you from the shelf. This is a gift that could gain value in years to come – but you won’t want to leave them in the box, that’s for certain!

Buy: https://www.amazon.com/Public-Enemy-Action-Figure-Set/dp/B01G1LRE9G

A Band T-Shirt

band t-shirt.jpg

If you want an easy gift that you know you’ll get right; there are plenty of websites out there that can deliver great band T-shirts at a good price. It is worth browsing but (the T-shirt) is always a good and durable present for the serious, die-hard music fan!

Buy: https://www.emp.co.uk/band-merch/t-shirts/?wt_mc=sea.google.nonbrand.emp_uk_generics_band_shirts.46319090565.band%20t%20shirts.e.c&adc=uk&gclid=CjwKCAiAu4nRBRBKEiwANms5WyV6ugiGLRPpNKcnkFVqROHAp30CBVDsL15TPfGfyUeT0roghAxv9RoCJO0QAvD_BwE

Gwen Stefani - You Make It Feel Like Christmas

gwen.jpg

The Voice coach and sometimes No Doubt frontwoman was inspired to write a seasonal song while visiting boyfriend Blake Shelton’s Oklahoma ranch. That initial inspiration soon snowballed into a full-fledged holiday album; featuring six originals and six covers of Christmas classics.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/You-Make-Feel-Like-Christmas/dp/B075MYGCG3/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1512222809&sr=8-1&keywords=Gwen+Stefani+-+You+Make+It+Feel+Like+Christmas

The Queen Is Dead (Deluxe Remaster)

smiths.jpg

The iconic Manchester band has reissued their classic L.P. with fully-restored version of The Queen Is Dead as well as a number of B-sides and rarities. It also comes with a previously-unreleased live album, recorded in Boston in August 1986 - and a D.V.D. featuring Derek Jarman’s The Queen Is Dead film.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Queen-Dead-2017-Master-Deluxe/dp/B073ZBHG1R

Smokey Robinson - Christmas Everyday

smokey.jpg

This fantastic set from the Miracle man is an Amazon exclusive, featuring three originals; including the title track - which he first recorded way back in 1963 on Christmas With the Miracles. Covers include Robinson’s take on Donny Hathaway’s This Christmas.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_1_19?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=smokey+robinson+christmas+everyday&sprefix=smokey+robinson+chr%2Caps%2C148&crid=2VBCNO0O6ROTL

Nonda Zus HD Car Music Adapter

NONDA.png

FM, 3.5mm AUX cable and Bluetooth connection to support all car types; regardless of year, make or model...Make and answer calls hands-free to ensure your safety while driving...Sleek, modern design to fit any car interior.

Buy: https://www.nonda.co/products/all-compatible-hd-music-adapter

Audioquest Dragonfly

USB.jpg

On their website; Audioquest explain why this is such a popular choice: “Launched in 2012, press and public alike have enthusiastically embraced AudioQuest’s multi-award-winning DragonFly USB digital-to-analog converter/preamp/headphone amp as the rare audio product that bridges the gap between die-hard audiophiles and mainstream music lovers. DragonFly plugs into a computer’s USB port to bypass the computer’s compromised audio circuitry and deliver cleaner, clearer, more naturally beautiful sound to headphones, powered speakers, and complete audio systems. Small, affordable, easy to use, and remarkably effective, DragonFly was named Stereophile’s 2012 “Computer Audio Component of the Year” and 2012 “Budget Component of the Year;” Tone Audio’s 2012 “Digital Product of the Year;” Computer Audiophile’s 2012 “Computer Audiophile Product of the Year;” AudioStream’s “Greatest Bits;” and What Hi-Fi?’s 2014 “Product of the Year.” Perhaps most memorably, DigitalAudioReview.net’s John Darko quipped: “A DAC with the DragonFly’s performance at the DragonFly’s price point is as rare as rocking horse sh*t.” We couldn’t have said it better”.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=audioquest+dragonfly+black&tag=googhydr-21&index=aps&hvadid=223847239824&hvpos=1t1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=1270551994944676627&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9045828&hvtargid=kwd-296947453403&ref=pd_sl_351xelfizz_b_p28

Steepletone Bluetooth Brighton Cream/Beige Retro 1950s-style 3-Band Portable Radio

Retro Radio.jpg

This is how the product is described: “EW AND EXCLUSIVE BLUETOOTH VERSION OF THIS EVER POPULAR CLASSIC. Steepletone Brighton 1950's Portable Bluetooth Retro Style Rotary Radio Manufacturer's Description Reminding us of the stylish and much adored radios from the 1950's and 1960's the Steepletone Brighton 3 band retro radio manages to capture the romance and familiarity of yesteryear whilst still giving top quality performance that you would expect from today's radio players. Sounding simply superb the Steepletone Brighton retro radio receives FM, MW and LW (long wave is great for picking up the cricket and the BBC world service), and can be powered via the mains electric (power lead supplied), or for portable use by using 6 x 'C' size batteries (available separately) Further features of the Steepletone Brighton retro radio include: Strong and stylish carrying handle, rotary on/off/volume control, rotary tone control for bass and treble, direct tuning, easy to read dial scale with rotary tuning, push button band selection, beige plastic finish, built in ferrite antenna for MW and LW bands and telescopic aerial for FM (4-section/50cm long). The Steepletone Brighton retro radio also comes with a 1 year warranty”.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Steepletone-Bluetooth-Dial-Latest-wirelessly-Smartphones-Cream-Connectivity/dp/B018PQ6EIW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1512223603&sr=8-1&keywords=retro+radio

The Beatles - The Christmas Records

beatles.jpg

This is another fantastic Beatles-related gift and one that is appropriate for this time of the year. The press-release assesses it in these terms: “During the height of Beatlemania, from 1963 through 1969, the Fab Four recorded and released holiday messages and songs on flexi-discs for their loyal fanclub members. Those rarities are now being widely released for the first time as a boxed set of colored vinyl singles in sleeves with the original flexi-disc artwork along with a 16-page booklet featuring notes on the recordings and reprints of the band’s National Newsletters, which were sent out to fanclub members with the holiday flex-discs. Note: Four out of six of the singles are one-sided. This is more of a collectors’ piece than a traditional Christmas album”.  

Buy: https://store.hmv.com/music/vinyl/the-christmas-records?gclid=CjwKCAiAu4nRBRBKEiwANms5W9MkMhABULNhbjGn8QPO8knj4ADPvcj1EzISp1-22VuBBlRU97VhTRoCoHcQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

Focusrite iTrack Pocket

iTrack.jpg

It’s as simple as connecting your phone, opening the app and hitting record! You can use the built-in microphone for vocals and acoustic guitar or hook up your electric guitar or line level instrument via the input jack. High-quality audio, effects and instant mastering – you’ll be a YouTube star. Capture your performances with a high-quality stereo microphone that fits in your pocket...KeepiTrack Pocket on you, take it anywhere and connect your phone every time you have a great idea...Record straight into Garage Band, iOS Camera App; iMovie, Rode Rec; Loopy HD and Tape.

Buy: https://www.gear4music.com/Recording-and-Computers/Focusrite-iTrack-Pocket/13CV

Astell & Kern AK70

Astell.jpg

The AK70 is Astell & Kern’s latest portable Hi-Res Audio player. It sits just above the company’s entry-level AK Jr, although entry to A&K’s post-iPod audiophile world costs just shy of £400 and the AK70 is priced at a not-inconsiderable £500. It is a great investment and terrific piece of technology that is worth the money – even as a Christmas gift!

Buy: https://www.richersounds.com/astell-kern-ak70-mint-green.html

R.E.M. - Automatic for the People (25th Anniversary Deluxe Edition)

set.jpg

Consequence of Sound were excited when this set was announced: “The Automatic re-release features the record freshly mixed by original producer Scott Litt and engineer Clif Norrellin in the brand new Dolby Atmos format. This is the first time Atmos has been used to mix commercially available music, and the new tech promises to “[transport] the listener inside the recording studio with multi-dimensional audio.” The four-disc Deluxe Edition includes a bonus disc of 20 never-before-heard demos from the recording session, including the previously shared mythical lost track “Devil Rides Backwards” and the unreleased recording “Mike’s Pop Song”.

Buy: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Automatic-People-25th-Anniversary-M/dp/B075K343CP

FEATURE: Bonnie and the Clyde: The St. Andrew’s Day Playlist

FEATURE:

 

Bonnie and the Clyde:

sc.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

The St. Andrew’s Day Playlist

___________

PERHAPS doing a pun about notorious…

CV.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: CHVRCHES/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

and ill-fated criminals is not the most logical way to endear myself to the nation of Scotland! Regardless; it is St. Andrew’s Day and, thinking of Scotland, it brings me to the musicians from the country. I feel Scotland gets overlooked when it comes to attention and focus. I think England - London especially - is the centre of attention and takes most of the spotlight. I realise Scotland is a long way away - but that does not mean it should be out of the critical gaze! Over the past couple of years; there have been some fantastic Scottish artists emerging: it is quite disappointing having to find these acts through websites and chance. One would hope there’d be a more proactive and concentrated method of promotion. The Scottish artists making waves right now have the potential to be big-league stars very soon. I am concerned there is not enough focus on them as it stands – meaning they have to graft a lot harder than most…

HB.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Honeyblood/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

If one looks at historical subjects from the nation; there is a banquet and bouquet of world-class music. The first song I ever heard (Everybody Wants to Rule the World) was from a Scottish act (Tears for Fears). It is a nation that has been with my since my childhood – celebrating and recognising their music is essential and much-warranted. Today is a day designed to recognise a Scottish saint but, more importantly, the importance and wonder of Scotland. From my perspective; the fantastic music that has always been bubbling in Scotland deserves exposure! I have mentioned how the media is a little slack when highlighting all the brilliant artists there. Maybe that (comparative) negligence spurs the Scottish creatives to define their own path and show little concerns for the rigidity and fabrication of the mainstream. It is the natural characteristics and perspective – from artists of Scotland – that makes me pine for their music. If many of the best acts from here are locating to other cities: it does not mean they are all emigrating to the South of the U.K. I want to expand on this theme and, time-permitting, write a feature on all the fantastic Scottish music right now...

mo.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Monkoora/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

Another aspect of Scotland that gets into my heart is the personality and humanity of the people. They have that bonhomie and brightness – unless they are a grump cu*t...in which case, they do not really fit into the model – and swim into the heart. The honesty, integrity and friendliness mean more people should be aware of the Scottish music scene – and the people themselves. I realise few celebrate their national days – the English not too worried about St. Andrew’s Day; the English not fixated on St. David’s Day (there is a pattern emerging!). I hope, in 2018, this is a national resolution we all stick to (paying attention to Scotland more). I have never been to Scotland but have heard wonderful things. Everyone I know who has gone there has come away with the same impression: it is a wonderful and awe-inspiring nation whose nature, people and culture seduce and drops the jaw. All of this considered, combined with the incredible music, makes me wonder why there is an absence of mainstream media coverage. Those classic acts are not the only reason Scotland has a proud and dignified musical legacy!

ten.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: TeenCanteen/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

With that in mind, as it is St. Andrew’s Day, a collection of fantastic songs from Scottish artists, past and present. This list contains those icons and epic songwriters we have all come to treasure –including Mogwai and Tears for Fears – and the newer breed emerging – Monkoora, TeenCanteen and Honeyblood among them. It is a varied and eclectic list that spans genres, cities and styles. It should be enough to slake the thirstiest and most curious music-lovers around. I, in the course of writing this, have stumbled upon artists I was not aware of - artists I will stick with and chase down. Not to return to my earlier point/rant, but I feel the media is missing out on so much treasure! Not to obsesses over issues like this so, stepping away, let us investigate a long and fantastic list of Scottish music – from artists who started their careers there; others who are coming through and taking advantage of the phenomenal venues and crowds. Get the headphones on, read up about St. Andrew; immerse your senses in the smells, horizons and sounds of Scotland. It is a playlist that proves…

fr.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images

WHAT a breadth of talent the nation has.

FEATURE: Into the Deep: The Blue Planet II-Themed Playlist

FEATURE:

 

Into the Deep:

1.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: BBC/Getty Images

The Blue Planet II-Themed Playlist

____________

MILLIONS of us have marvelled at the latest…

davs.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sir David Attenborough/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty Images/Press

Sir David Attenborough-narrated documentary, Blue Planet II. Most of us – I would think all, in fact! – will never get the chance to see, with our own eyes, the kind of scenes that were filmed for the show! One might imagine watching the marvels and unpredictable majesty of the oceans, seen through a T.V., would lack a certain naturalness and wonder. Whether it was the cinematography or Attenborough’s narration: it is as though we were diving and swimming alongside the cameras; watching the curious ocean-life as they went about their business. Radiohead and Hans Zimmer collaborated on the five-minute trailer for Blue Planet II – an intriguing and cinematic score that articulated the awe and captivation of the deep blue.

There has been so much to take from the show. None of us could quite comprehend the endless majesty and mystique of the sea. Not only has Hans Zimmer, Jacob Shea and David Fleming – for the soundtrack to Blue Planet II – given us scores and symphonies for each creature/occasion: the stunning images and narration provides the listener with the chance to score their own soundtrack. I was awed and hushed by solemn scenes of fish aimlessly seeking the beds of the oceans; predators hiding and nuzzling in coral; schools of fish in a balletic, perfectly choreographed storm; cute turtles lazily swooning in the cool; strange and wonderful sights that remain in the mind forever! It has been a tremendous series – we all hope there will be a third instalment down the line. There is something about Sir David Attenborough’s voice and passion of the natural world that means everything that comes from his mouth is urgent and meaningful!

3.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: BBC/Getty Images

To mark the triumphant and much-admired Attenborough show; I have compiled an ocean/sea creature-inspired playlist. Some of the songs are symphonic and graceful; others have appropriate titles – some are just plain silly! I have trawled the ocean of music (sorry!) to find all kind of sound and sensations; songs that, through name or origins, remind you of the water – and the array of fascinating bodies who frolic beneath. It has been fun but the most evocative and memorable pieces of music are the ones from the Blue Planet II soundtrack itself – you do not need to watch the show to imagine the beauty the music summons. Of course; you should revisit all the previous episodes and remind yourself why the show is drawing such praise! In this playlist, alongside the Radiohead/Hans Zimmer collaboration: enjoy an oceanic smorgasbord of Blue Planet II-inspired songs…

2.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: BBC/Getty Images

AND slowly drift away.

FEATURE: Writer’s Block: Why Hip-Hop’s Early Incarnation Deserves Fonder Reinvestigation

FEATURE:

 

Writer’s Block:

1.jpg

 PHOTO CREDITS: Getty Images/Press 

Why Hip-Hop’s Early Incarnation Deserves Fonder Reinvestigation

___________

I have been getting stuck into new music with...

2.jpg

fervency the past few months - and have found some great bands/acts I feel will do great in 2018. One of the things I am noticing is how many new artists are looking back and taking influence from previous years! This might include a Pop/Electro act sourcing from 1980s artists like Madonna and Prince; a modern Rock artist inspired by the muscle and swagger of Led Zeppelin. I am not one prone to endless nostalgia and contemplation but I am interesting seeing how the past is such an integral part of the present. Pop music, for all its shine and polish, sounds utterly infectious when it has bygone D.N.A. and classic strands. It is no coincidence my favourite two albums of the year, Lorde’s Melodrama and Kendrick Lamar’s DAMN. find strength and clarity in the arms of music’s better days. Lorde, claiming the top spot in my heart, has crafted a masterpiece in Melodrama. It is her second album and one that manages to muse on heartbreak and tough times - but do so with a lot of colour, variation and musical exploitation.

3.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kendrick Lamar

I am in love with the album and admire how the young Lorde has sprinkled elements of the 1980s and 1990s into a modern and progressive work. The same can be said of Lamar and his latest piece of genius. Maybe To Pimp a Butterfly (2015) was a more vibrant affiliation with past Hip-Hop past ventures but I can see a lot of older sounds in DAMN., too. The record has been lauded by critics and demonstrates what a sensational human Kendrick Lamar is. He is one of the few mesmeric Hip-Hop artists that have found their way into my soul. My opinion is Pop/Rock is stronger when matching modern and of-the-moment sounds with the finest from the past: Hip-Hop transcends and stuns when (artists) interweave the glorious past with the urgent modern. I feel too many artists in the genre are neglecting some of the finer days and the sort of possibilities that can arrive from experimentation.

Kendrick Lamar is an exception, I find. If Grime and Rap has a few masters (female and male) and a lot of potential hopefuls: Hip-Hop is in a state of 9-1-1 (to quote an Eminem lyric). One problem I have found is how many newer artists in the genre are losing focus right from the off. So many songs are bringing endless collaborators and that, for all the good intentions in the world, is distilling the song and crowding it out. If a Rock song had four of five guest vocalists on it; that would put off the listeners and cause them to go elsewhere. It seems almost required for the hottest new Hip-Hop star to pen a tune and sling a host of bodies into the mix. Whilst I am delighted there are new Hip-Hop/Rap treasures like Princess Nokia emerging and amazing the senses; her best work makes one think of the glory days of the genres. ABCs of New York integrates bits of Lauryn Hill in parts; the song reminds me of the 1990s and the artists emerging during that period - a dazzling and instant smash for a hot young artist.

4.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Princess Nokia

I feel Princess Nokia will have a long and prosperous career. She is an artist with a singular mind and forging her own path through music. Away from her – and some other like-minded, talented peers – there is not a huge amount to recommend. I have written about the logistics and legalities when it comes to sampling music and creating songs that weave a variety of songs together. I have been revisiting the best days of Rap and Hip-Hop and the likes of De La Soul, Beastie Boys and Public Enemy. I adore the ‘Flower Age’ De La Soul and how they managed to pen incredibly engaging and mind-blowing songs without profanity and rampant sexism. I guess that period (the late-1980s) still contained sexism and offence – I like to think there was a greater degree of purity and purpose back then – but I listen to an album like 3 Feet High and Rising and marvel at the way the U.S. band broke grown and created something pioneering.

5.jpg

It was one of the first Hip-Hop/Rap albums that fused comedic skits and lighter tones with exceptional production and sampling. One need only listen to songs like Potholes in My Lawn, Eye Know; Me, Myself and I and The Magic Number and see the list of (other) songs featured within. Maybe I am bathing in the warm waters of nostalgia but I wonder why modern Hip-Hop is defined by polished productions and a rather direct and unabashed energy. I feel De La Soul’s greatest work is not a product of the 1980s – it was released in 1989 and inspired artists who would add an incredible footprint to the 1990s. I listen to that record and laugh at skits and brief turns; admire the fact there are twenty-four songs and the album was too long to put on vinyl – maybe there was self-indulgence in parts but it showed how passionate and determined the band were to make history!

The same can be said of an album like Beastie Boys’ Paul’s Boutique. That record arrived in the same year (as 3 Feet High and Rising) and, when it arrived, found critics miffed and confused. Many were unsure whether the sample-heavy L.P. was career-suicide for the New York legends. Of course; time has proved them wrong and that album is seen as one of the finest of the 1980s. Again; there was a mix of comedy and incredible spits; fine rhymes and incredible energy. I guess there is a bit of a difference between Beastie Boys and De La Soul. The latter were seen as hippies and a product of the 1960s – their records were a mellow and soothing affair; offence and trouble were not on their mind, Beastie Boys were a more expressive and fired-up band but they rarely relied on shock and crudeness to make their point. The heyday of their career found them taking a bold and explosive approach to sampling and crate digging.

I am agog when listening to Paul’s Boutique and the music the boys laced into their exceptional tracks. Many could argue times have evolved to the point where sampling has become impossible and costly. I am hearing modern artists (in other genres) sample and they have not reported major obstacles. Perhaps that is because they are only sampling a single track (or two) but there are few out there willing to take the initiative and create an album and multifarious and cross-pollinating as 3 Feet High and Rising and Paul’s Boutique. Public Enemy’s It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back arrived in 1988 and was, arguably, the start of a new wave of Hip-Hop gods. It is hard drawing a line between the three classic acts I have mentioned: each shares the D.N.A. of genius and groundbreaking music. Public Enemy’s strongest statement was defined by anger and a feeling of alienation. With Chuck D on the microphone, the record looked at the plight of black citizens in the U.S.; corruption from police and the government; the way his peers were being segregated and abused. An album that dealt with such harsh subjects did not deliver its music and motifs with po-faced production and a lack of imagination.

6.jpg

Take a gulp of the album and you witness a staggering display of lyrical/poetic inventiveness and sampling; incredible compositions and command like nothing else – a record that compels the body to move and makes you think. Even though we are not in the 1980s anymore; that does not mean Hip-Hop/Rap needs to become too entrenched in modern times. The albums I have named are the tip of the iceberg – I would urge people to properly investigate the late-1980s/early-1990s and the way Hip-Hop exploded and evolved. We cannot claim times were different then: today; there is the same political corruption and sense of division around the world. Not only are many Hip-Hop/Rap artists lacking any true incentive and fortitude: the music is quite flat and commercial. I am excited considering a new Eminem album - but there are few other Hip-Hop artists I am genuinely pumped about.

7.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Eminem 

At a time when we need these men and women to step up to the plate and show music how it is done – are the best of the breed failing to rise to the challenge and deliver an album with any real substance and genius?! If you look at the finest albums this year; there are going to be one or two Hip-Hop/Urban albums in there - but I feel other genres will take a bigger slice of the pie. Something as blissful and dreamy as 3 Feet High and Rising is what the music world needs at the moment – there are artists who get close but nobody quite reaches those heights – and could spark a new movement in Hip-Hop. At such a dark and fraught time; there is a distinct lack of humour and fun to be found in music right now. Hip-Hop does not have to lose its authenticity and street credit if it returns, to a degree, back to past decades and revokes its magic and wonder. Public Enemy showed you could deliver bombs of passion and proclamation but ensure the compositions sparked and ignited the mind.

I get tired by processed beats and formulaic lines; too many weak-willed mandates and insignificant albums. It sounds like I am taking aim at Hip-Hop but there have been wonderful records from the past few years – creations that have the potential to endure for many years to come. This stubborn and beleaguered music lover is always looking back and wondering whether modern music would benefit from greater pairing with its predecessors. We are seeing the 1980s making a comeback in Pop; the 1990s have never really escaped from music – a lot of artists I am featuring still obsesses over the guitar bands of the early-2000s. I feel Hip-Hop is the genre that stands above the rest and has the power to change lives and situations. During a period where the U.S. is being led to Hell; the world is fractured and people are not sure what the future holds – music holds a place and holds the torch that can shine a guiding light.

8.jpg

I feel Rock and Indie will only progress and inspire if we allow greater chances and access rights for the best of the underground; the mainstream become credible and worthy if there is a restructuring and a thorough investigation – have fewer commercial acts and restructure the charts so unsigned artists are provided the platform to mix with the big names – and Jazz provided better oxygen if people hang up their prejudices and preconceptions. Hip-Hop still suffers from being seen as rather niche and threatening. Few people I know listen to it and many assume (a Hip-Hop record) will be a slagheap of sex, sexism and suggestion. If leaders like Kendrick Lamar are no strangers to spicy language and prevarication: their music is designed to get people thinking and make a difference in the world. He is a rare example of what Hip-Hop can do and how far it can reach. Gone are the days of Lauryn Hill, De La Soul and Beastie Boys. I wonder whether the fact there are no modern-day comparisons is because of rigidity and fear. Many artists are sceptical casting their mind to the past – fearing they would be accused of being unoriginal and a pallid replica – but the difficulty sampling music and injecting that into your own is limiting a degree of creativity and potential.

10.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Run-D.M.C. (whose 1986 album, Raising Hell, was one of the most influential Hip-Hop records of the decade)

This is something we need to look at but, as it stands, it is possible and (relatively) inexpensive for modern artists to get permission to use other’s songs – and sprinkle that into their own body. Apart from modern queens like Princess Nokia; I miss the sparkle, colour and dreamy flows I grew up on. Perhaps I am being myopic but there is a great need to desire, among many, for Hip-Hop to open its mind and look back at its forefathers. Maybe there is not a universal writer’s block but there are few who are creating genuine works of art – albums that can remain for decades and inspire the new generations. In order for Hip-Hop to move forward; I think, ironically…

IT needs to take a long, fond look at the past.

FEATURE: 6 Overground: Why BBC Radio 6 Music Remains Britain’s Most Essential Station

FEATURE:

 

6 Overground:

6.jpg

ALL PHOTOS (unless stated otherwise): Getty Images/Press 

Why BBC Radio 6 Music Remains Britain’s Most Essential Station

___________

THE working regime, for me, usually starts as Chris Hawkins is…

chris.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Chris Hawkins

entertaining his listeners on BBC Radio 6 Music. I do not tune in that early but, as I fight my way through fatigue and the temptation to emigrate to a hot climate – sack the job off and establish a music label in the U.S./Australia – I am brought back to Earth and realise I have to continue and life that nine-to-five life (ironic; given the fact I work a lot longer than that!). By the time I roll into the office, and unleash the caffeine enema, I am ready to settle down to the last half-hour with Hawkins. It is the voice of Shaun Keaveny that provides tonic, impetus and drive to keep going. I wrote, earlier in this year, about BBC Radio 6 Music and its merits; how it is an essential destination for anyone who loves their music. I will draw in an article – a very illuminating one Esquire published back in 2015 – that followed a typical day on the station; spoke with personnel and provided snippets of conversation and music that showed why the station survived the chop and has continued to grow. The latest Rajar figures – nothing to do with the leaders of India and their followers; to nick a joke from Frank Skinner – show there is a shift in the radio market. Chris Evans, the ginger one with a love of cars, has seen his listenership dip a bit: Nick Grimshaw’s morning show on Radio 1 is losing listeners at the rate of knots – there are changes that mean people are starting to head the way of BBC Radio 6 Music.

6s.jpg

One can say that is a sign of age – younger listeners growing up and wanting something more mature – but I think it is to do with quality and the desire for something deeper and more appealing. I will come back to Keaveny very soon (as I run-down my favourite D.J.s and why the station is blossoming) but here is an article, from May, that showed where the listeners are flocking the way of ‘6’:

BBC Radio 6 Music has achieved its highest ever audience figures as digital listening continues to grow across the UK, new data has revealed.

According to the latest Rajar figures (Q1 2017 2nd Jan-2nd April 2017), the station draws a record 2.35m listeners every week (from 2.33m last quarter and 2.24m last year). The Shaun Keaveny Breakfast Show, which recently celebrated its 10th anniversary, has a weekly reach of 1.12m, making it the most listened to programme on the network. Steve Lamacq’s weekday afternoon show remains over the 1m mark, with 1.115m listeners. Other shows enjoying record figures include Mary Anne Hobbs, Cerys Matthews, Huey Morgan, Chris Hawkins, Iggy Pop, Jarvis Cocker’s Sunday Service, Guy Garvey’s Finest Hour and 6 Music Classic Concerts.

The share of all radio listening (BBC and commercial radio) via a digital platform now stands at a new record share of 47.2% (44.1% last year), with 32m people tuning into radio via a digital platform (DAB, Online and DTV) every week. DAB remains the lead digital platform by some margin, and now delivers over 1/3 of all radio hours in the UK.

 Bob Shennan, Director of BBC Radio and Music, says: “Despite huge changes in the sector, it’s heartening to see a massive 89% of the UK population committing to listen to radio each week across a variety of devices. It has been a strong year for digital innovation right across BBC Radio with all our services seeing digital growth of one sort or another, especially BBC Radio 6 Music which goes from strength to strength, building a loyal audience that recognises a station run by music-lovers for music-lovers.”

Those all merry tidings for a station is going from strength-to-strength. I mentioned I’d return to Keaveny - and so I must! My usual radio-listening day starts properly around 7 A.M. and ends later in the afternoon, Monday through to Friday. I have heard other breakfast shows on radio and they all have drawbacks and perils: either too many adverts or inane chatter; terrible music or, if you’re really lucky, a combination of all three. With Keaveny; there is none of the pitfall and scars you get with rivals. He is a denigrating presence who is always tough on himself and his professionalism. The truth is it takes a lot of effort to get up, be consistently funny and produce a fantastic show every weekday – I will resist making a joke at this point. Not only is the charming/belligerent northerner perfect to get the spirits up and eyes bright during the working week; the music played on the show is consistently brilliant! I feel that is another reason many are flocking from stations like BBC Radio 1 and their colleagues: the range of music is often unreliable and the presenters not always as likeable as you’d like...

I find the younger vibe of Radio 1 puts too much emphasis on mainstream music and the kind of artists who go for streaming figures as opposed to genuine merit and respect. You do get some affable D.J.s and good music but its demographic is rigid when it comes to age and tastes. The same can be said of Radio 2 and its make-up. The music balances chart acts but it also features a greater number of older songs and artists – not as close to the top of the quality-spectrum as you’d hope for. I prefer Radio 2 over its younger peer but they are the only real BBC options out there – Radio 3, 4 and 5 have a very narrow sound/scope and are quite niche. The joy of 6 is the fact it takes all the best aspects of 1 and 2 – the energy and cool music combined with mature presenters who have been in the music industry a long time – and bundles it all into a kitten-cute package that appeals to those music-lovers who know their stuff. If you’d expect other radio stations’ listeners to be the sort who are nursing hangovers and wiping vomit from the corner of their mouth (not necessarily their own!): the discerning listening of BBC Radio 6 Music will be digging through crates of vinyl and queuing in line to see the latest Dutch Uncles gig. Keaveny is a former musician – and current lead of the epic Bince Meef (currently on-hiatus and planning an international tour, I understand) and has that affectionate bond with his music news presenter, Matt Everitt.

shaun.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Shaun Keaveny (photo courtesy of Esquire)

The reason I defected to BBC Radio 6 Music years ago was the tones and style of Shaun Keaveny. Every aspect of my writing and blog is compelled by the talent at 6 Music in some way. Keaveny has provoked me to think bigger and diversify my pages; bring in new features and become more ambitious. Even though Keaveny cuts a self-deprecating and imprisoned figure – a supplicant who prays to the gods of music to strike him down; wondering why he has not been fired – you can tell how comforted and defined he is by his role. I have covered this before but there are so many reasons Keaveny is one of the major stars of the station – someone who is responsible for bringing in new listeners and keeping the existing ones where they are. Make sure you tune in every weekday morning between 7 and 10 to hear the old master at work. Whether is his array of stunning impersonations – from Samantha out of Sex and the City; Paul McCartney or Donald Trump – you wonder how the man does it! It is just as well he is employed at the BBC as, without that outlet, he’d probably be confined to a nursing home. The comedic and vocals skills of Keaveny and his affectionate connection to Everitt (and producer Phil) means it is essential listener every morning., Matt Everitt’s music news is authoritative, funny and informative – the former Menswear legend/drummer is someone I listen out for so I can listen to/steal all his music news. He is an essential part of the breakfast team and keeps Keaveny in order when required!

When the show ends; it is to Lauren Laverne’s show we go. Like many of BBC Radio 6 Music’s personnel; she is a former musician – the lead of the incredible 1990s band, Kenickie – and seems to have limitless enthusiasm and passion for music. Her incredible knowledge and professionalism (as slick and charming as an oiled sea lion) stun me. I am always surprised she has energy left: there are so many side-projects and tentacles to her professional life. As founder of The Pool – a website featuring female writers; it tackles issues in society and features culture, fashion and music – she also presents on BBC Radio 4 and gives talks; is a D.J. who works at various festivals and events – a female Stephen Fry (if such a figure can be imagined!) who has her fingers in all sort of pies! Whereas Keaveny has his own style and dynamic: there is a distinct personality and flavour to Laverne’s show. Once again, as I covered this earlier in the year, I do not want to tread on the festival-mushed grass of repetition. I feel one of the reasons BBC Radio 6 Music is converting many to their pulpit of biblical music and congregation of proper music-lovers is talent like Laverne. She has a terrific rapport with the listeners and a warm and paternal warmth. Not only is she one of the most intelligent and knowledgeable D.J.s on the station but is incredibly quick-witted and funny. If Shaun Keaveny has the demeanour of a man who has committed a credit card fraud and, as opposed to a jail term, has been given the option of having his testicle hairs waxed off by Piers Morgan – Lauren Laverne is a cheerier disposition who nicely contrasts and evolves.

loz.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Lauren Laverne/PHOTO CREDIT: @laurenlaverne

Keaveny is a fantastic D.J. and an addictive draw for the listeners: Laverne is another wonderful human D.J. whose endless curiosity for music means she provides us with the best new underground artists and those long-forgotten songs that we should never have abandoned. One of the big reasons there are new listeners to the station is because of that music. Certain presenters have their own preferences and sounds. With Laverne; one gets a lot of great Electronic music and Indie sounds; it plays on the lighter side (of sound) but is the most eclectic show, in my view. I will allude to the empathic and revealing feature Esquire ran two years ago – when I talk about Steve Lamacq, Radcliffe and Maconie and others – but, for me, Lauren Laverne (like Keaveny) is the reason I remain with BBC Radio 6 Music. The reason I wanted to revise and update my previous love-note was the fact 2017 has been an incredible year for the station. I have assimilated so many aspects of the station into my work and drive; Lauren Laverne, and the way she manages to dig those lesser-heard artists and shines them for the listening public, has made me conduct a similar archaeological approach to music – I thank her for introducing me to some great artists who are part of my regular rotation; I have met so many terrific musicians because of her guidance. One might criticise a station like 6 Music for being a bit of a pub for former musicians and those luring for previous decades: Laverne is someone always looking forward and of the mindset: the best of music is yet to come.

I would refute this viewpoint but know, as she does, we are going to see some tremendous music in the future. The D.J.s of the station do not live in the past and clinging to a time that no longer exists: they are always looking for great new music and embracing what is fresh and current. The age argument is not fair as Lauren Laverne is only thirty-ni…thirty-somethin…thirty-eigh…she is pretty young and hip, still, okay! The fact she has been in a popular and acclaimed band means she has that inside knowledge and appreciation for music’s inner-workings and complexities. She was among the most vociferous voices that campaigned when BBC Radio 6 Music was threatened with closure. It is clear she has that endless love for what she does! Once Laverne clocks off at 1; we then head over to Salford for Radcliffe and Maconie – meanwhile, somewhere in London, Steve Lamacq is preparing his show and, one suspects, nursing a pint at a local boozer! Another reason BBC Radio 6 Music lures me is down to its northern contingency. Shaun Keaveny, Lauren Laverne and RadMac (Mark and Stuart) are from that neck of the woods – not many mainstream stations can boast that many northern stars. In a music industry that is seeing its voice twanged and instilled with a thick London accent: it is nice knowing there is some genuine and pure voice who are not willing to go all R.P. for P.R. These genuine and real personalities burst from the speakers and get into the heart.

DOhMCwXW0AQba9E.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Radcliffe and Maconie with Eno Williams of Ibibio Sound Machine/PHOTO CREDIT: @BBCRadMac

Radcliffe and Maconie are among the most experienced D.J.s on the airwaves. Both have been in the industry for decades – Stuart Maconie used to work for the likes of Melody Maker and NME – and they have presented together on other stations. Their brother-like partnership means the listener starts their afternoons with huge laughs and entertainment. I have not mentioned the features on each show – I have covered that before and will come to that in the conclusion – but, with Radcliffe and Maconie; you get some wonderful guests and brilliant music. Like Keaveny and Laverne; there is a distinct ethos and aesthetic to their show. Stuart Maconie hosts his Freak Zone show whereas Radcliffe presents a Folk show on BBC Radio 2. Both are huge fans of new music but are keen to provide the listeners with the finest and most intriguing new acts from around the world. Both are incredibly sharp and funny and, with every link and moment, you are guaranteed to transcend into a better mood. One can take that age-old/old-age argument some have proffered and argue that is the very reason BBC Radio 6 Music is gaining huge ground: people prefer experienced and knowledgeable voices; they are less reliant on the inane and youthful chatter you get on ‘some’ stations. With Radcliffe and Maconie; you are not listening to two old men talking about their dangling prostates; cranking up the latest Buddy Holly hit and wondering why the young people are swearing so much these days – that seems to be the impression some critics have!

DO137GfXUAA7Dfk.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: A recent guest on RadMac's show, Weaves/PHOTO CREDIT: @BBCRadMac

What you do get is two chaps who have huge experience and bring that expertise to that show. Their show has a very youthful side to it: you do not only get songs from the 1960s and 1970s; there is a great blend of the brand-new and established. Mark Radcliffe spoke with Esquire in 2015 - and gave his views as to why BBC 6 Music is growing; why their show provides satisfaction and fulfilment; why you cannot label and rigidly defined stations/listeners:

Rock’n’roll was the first music for teenagers,” he says. “And we’re still in an age when people who were teenagers then are still around. So the idea was, when it was invented, pop music was for young people and then they would grow out of it and when you were in your mid-thirties you would start listening to Mantovani and [long-running Radio 2 light-entertainment show] Sing Something Simple. But I don’t really understand this. If, your whole life, you’ve been driven by this adventurous spirit to find new things that you like, why would you at any point stop? If you’re really into food, why would you stop eating new things? If you’re really interested in travel, why would you stop unless you physically couldn’t go on? And, of course, music is brilliant. So why would you lose that?

I will allude to that article more a bit later (legally, of course!) but I always ensure I tune into Radcliffe and Maconie every weekday afternoon. Steve Lamacq, who follows them, provides a distinctly London accent and different dimension. His show features reviews of the latest singles and in-studio performances from the hottest acts around. ‘Lammo’ doggedly and diligently plans his shows and is a veritable truffle-hound; keen to sniff the latest vibes and sounds for his adoring listeners.

steve.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Steve Lamacq (photo courtesy of Esquire)

I feel so many people are tuning into BBC Radio 6 Music because the live venues scene is dwindling and under threat. Lammo is among the most vocal when it comes to preserving our best venues and ensuring they are subsidised. If one cannot get out to a gig – we have less disposable income, so often rely on the Internet and T.V. for our entertainment – he provides a worthy alternative. Not only does he guide you to the best gigs and events to see: he brings musicians into his lair and hosts those exhilarating and unforgettable performances. Lammo, in the aforementioned interview, has his opinions on the demographic – and whether the station appeals to those who yearn for older music:

Certainly, we have a lot of people in their forties who are reconstructed rave-goers,” Lamacq says. “People who spent a lot of their teens and early twenties standing in fields around the M25. But then their music tastes have changed and they’re into folk or rock music or whatever. It doesn’t stop them liking what they liked as a kid. They’ve grown up with three or four different types of music.”

I will flirt and skip my way through the remaining presenters – my hand might fall off if I do that! – but there is an amazing array of spectacular D.J.s under the BBC Radio 6 Music banner. Dividing its broadcasts between London (Wogan House) and MediaCity UK (Salford).

new.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Mary Anne Hobbs/PHOTO CREDITLaura Lewis

I will take one last piece from the Esquire article – lest I use more of their words than mine – but Mark Radcliffe provided illuminating insight as to why Salford is a great base; why BBC Radio 6 Music provides freedom other stations do not:

 “When we were working in the north for Radio 1 and Radio 2, we very much felt like an outpost, which we quite enjoyed, really,” says Radcliffe. “But there was always this sense that the big cheeses in London were letting you ‘have a go’, whereas now I think there’s a sense of ownership on the part of 6 Music. We’re the first station that’s been on that twin basis, and we do feel empowered by that.

What can they do on 6 Music that they couldn’t do on Radio 2?

Play good records,” says Radcliffe. “The thing is that the common consent among all of us that work on it is that 6 Music gives something that we knew people wanted all along, really. People are always open to a much wider selection of music than people working on radio stations give them credit for. Everyone you know who likes music plays a whole range of things.”

If the Esquire feature paints the London studios in draconian, dystopian terms – nearly comparing it to a wooden shed of a classroom at a comprehensive school somewhere in Falkirk – it is clear there is no reason for the Salford talent (Craig Charles, Chris Hawkins and Mary Anne Hobbs among them) to relocate to London.

DPaBA8WXUAAWbwz.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Mark Radcliffe with Thundercat

There is a great community and spirit up near Manchester. The studios seem extraodinary and perfect; a different sensation to walking into the studios in London, it seems. That geographical distance might show divisions but, conversely, it is the strength of the station. BBC Radio 6 Music promotes diversity and variation: having a centralised, homogenised outpost would not be a wise decision. I will end things in a second but, until then, a dying word (promise) from the article; how the station as viewed in 2015 – and why it is attracting people in by the bus-load:

We thought there was a gap for a radio service somewhere between where Radio 1 and Radio 2 was,” explains Jeff Smith, Head of Music at Radio 2 and 6 Music, a role that sees him have final say on which tracks are played across both stations.

We looked at all sorts of content and one of them was an album rock station. One of the key points of that was to really dig into the BBC archive. So we had two people spending nine hours a day going through the sessions we’d done at the BBC for the last 25–30 years. Despite all our thinking about creating an album rock station with The Eagles tracks and Simon & Garfunkel, they found the archive was all Siouxsie & The Banshees and The Fall, because all the sessions were done by [John] Peel or [Radio 1’s Nineties indie show, hosted by Steve Lamacq and Jo Whiley] The Evening Session. And in the time between then and now, because the archive was very alternative in nature, very British, we started to build around that.”

Still, it wasn’t the strongest manifesto for a brand new radio station. Was it meant for people who’d outgrown Radio 1? Or for people who wanted a deeper music experience than they got on Radio 2? Or neither?

Tucked away on digital – at a time when far fewer people owned digital radios, or even understood what they did – 6 Music proved a hard sell.

I will end this but, the reason I wanted to return to the shores of BBC Radio 6 Music, is to congratulate, what I think, is its finest and most productive year. They had a bumper selection of guests a couple of months back – Robert Plant and Morrissey among them – and were up in Glasgow for their annual festival. Tomorrow, Shaun Keaveny provides the rundown of the station’s favourite albums of the year; Lauren Laverne has provides some wonderful live guests and performances. Every D.J., in their own way, has added to the magic and palace that is teasing listeners from other stations – curious listeners kicking off their shoes and staying put with the wonders of BBC Radio 6 Music. It is staggering considering, merely a few years back, the station was rebuilding after near-closure and extinction. For a digital-only station; it is amazing seeing so many people flock to the station; spreading the love and proffering its benefits. For all the latest hustling, events and news; the cool interviews and decorations of BBC Radio 6 Music; you can have a look at their website and get involved. I will leave this now and congratulate the station on a record year: they have built their base and continued to grow; that seems likely to continue into 2018! As the final days of the year come into view; we are all looking ahead at what lies ahead and whether the best of new music will reach our ears. With the stellar and extraordinary BBC Radio 6 Music; you can bet your bottom-dollar you are…

loz2.jpg

IN very safe hands.

FEATURE: Net Neutrality: How Its Potential Eradication Will Spell Problems for U.S. Music

FEATURE:

 

Net Neutrality:

DPSVEjRWsAUFrG5.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images 

How Its Potential Eradication Will Spell Problems for U.S. Music

___________

MAYBE it wouldn’t have been the worst thing to elect…

FCC.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Members of the FCC/PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

Hilary Clinton as the President of the U.S.A. I can only imagine how some Trump supporters are feeling after the election of the odious leader! This is a petition and charter you will all want to sign. Maybe this is an issue that will affect the U.S. more but net neutrality is something we are living with at the moment: its tightening and erosion will spell the end of free-speech as we know it. Maybe it is a bloated oligarch unwilling to open his ears to the criticism and common sense being aimed his way – like a petulant child who sticks their fingers in and makes a loud noise; blocking out their parents’ shouting and discipline. We can only hope the hideous Trump is buried under the weight of his own ignorance, bigotry and stupidity before the end of his four-year spell in office. Whilst the President gets in some brilliant-white shag carpeting and commissions ego-boosting portraits of himself – to drape on every white wall – he is also planning on killing net neutrality. In a few weeks; we will know whether net neutrality’s death is signed and destined – or whether there will be a turnaround and cure. It does not mean the shutting down of the Internet as we know it: the aim is to control and monitor websites and information we share online.

free.png

PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

At the moment; we can access any website we want and have the freedom to share information/content how we see fit – so long as it is not illegal. Protests will take place in the U.S. on 7th December: people will take to the streets and register their disgust on the Internet. If you want to know what neutrality is; how its end will affect us and what comes next for us – here is a useful guide via Save the Internet:

Net Neutrality is the basic principle that prohibits internet service providers like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon from speeding up, slowing down or blocking any content, applications or websites you want to use. Net Neutrality is the way that the internet has always worked.

In 2015, millions of activists pressured the Federal Communications Commission to adopt historic Net Neutrality rules that keep the internet free and open — allowing you to share and access information of your choosing without interference.

But right now this win is in jeopardy: Trump’s FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, wants to destroy Net Neutrality. In May, the FCC voted to let Pai’s internet-killing plan move forward. By the end of the summer, the agency was flooded with more than 20 million comments. The vast majority of people commenting urged the FCC to preserve the existing Net Neutrality rules.

Time is running out: The FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal on Dec. 14. Join the millions who have already spoken out against it.

trump.jpeg

 IN THIS PHOTO: President Donald J. Trump/PHOTO CREDIT: Alex Wong via Getty Images

What is Net Neutrality?

Net Neutrality is the internet’s guiding principle: It preserves our right to communicate freely online.

Net Neutrality means an internet that enables and protects free speech. It means that ISPs should provide us with open networks — and shouldn’t block or discriminate against any applications or content that ride over those networks. Just as your phone company shouldn’t decide who you call and what you say on that call, your ISP shouldn’t interfere with the content you view or post online.

Without Net Neutrality, cable and phone companies could carve the internet into fast and slow lanes. An ISP could slow down its competitors’ content or block political opinions it disagreed with. ISPs could charge extra fees to the few content companies that could afford to pay for preferential treatment — relegating everyone else to a slower tier of service. This would destroy the open internet.

What would happen if we lost Net Neutrality?

The internet without Net Neutrality isn’t really the internet. Unlike the open internet that has paved the way for so much innovation and given a platform to people who have historically been shut out, it would become a closed-down network where cable and phone companies call the shots and decide which websites, content or applications succeed.

This would have an enormous impact. Companies like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon would be able to decide who is heard and who isn’t. They’d be able to block websites or content they don’t like or applications that compete with their own offerings.

hands.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Juan Jose Horta 

The consequences would be particularly devastating for marginalized communities media outlets have misrepresented or failed to serve. People of color, the LGBTQ community, indigenous peoples and religious minorities in the United States rely on the open internet to organize, access economic and educational opportunities, and fight back against systemic discrimination.

Without Net Neutrality, how would activists be able to fight oppression? What would happen to social movements like the Movement for Black Lives? How would the next disruptive technology, business or company emerge if internet service providers only let incumbents succeed?

Huffington Post have bluntly explained what an Internet shift and paradigm change will mean for the average internet user:

If the FCC ruling is allowed to stand, a few cable providers will get rich, new Internet ventures will move to other parts of the world, content will shift to places and languages that leave Americans out, and millions of Americans that

Which is why Americans need to voice, loudly, their displeasure with the FCC decision with their elected officials NOW, before the Trump’s television giveaway gets underway.

You can reach the FCC by email, or join one of the many protests to your elected officials by phonetext message to Fax, or petitions on Change.org, the White House, the Free Press, and Sign For Good. Like all regulation changes, we’re in the comment period”.

cyber.png

PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

At the moment; we all pay a fee for our Internet service but we are aware of what else we are paying for – subscription fees for media sites and news outlets; for Spotify and Amazon; various other charges. In essence, without neutrality, Internet service providers can block certain contact and imposer stringent censorship. If an artist/figure has an outspoken political view and criticises the regime; that I.S.P. can block their videos/content and impose penalties. It can lead to an all-out block and black-out. Services can be moved to other nations and charges can be levied on the user; everyone will be watched and there will be a greater amount of restrictions and curfews. I mentioned how Trump was a delicate little flower: the bloated birthday-boy who does not want anyone to eat his cake; a stubborn and spoilt brat who spits orders and infantile waffle to anyone who will listen. We are talking about a scenario that would be somewhere between China and North Korea. One can see the Internet and access it: they would be controlled and manoeuvred by the State and there would be intense and rigorous political measures. In theory, if the measure went through, a service provider like AT&T could block or censor an artist who criticises the President. They could block the service, FaceTime, so users would have to look around for other options – more expensive and less user-friendly.

free.jpg

Before I come and drill down to the point – and how it can affect the music and entertainment industry in America – let us look who is behind the movement – and why it is proving controversial. The Daily Beast has provided their views:

The man behind this move is Ajit Pai, the chairman of the FCC, who took up his post on January 23, three days after Donald J. Trump moved into the White House. In March, Trump said that Pai would be renominated to serve an additional five years as FCC chairman, and the Senate confirmed this term in October.

Just a little over a month after his confirmation, Pai is making moves to dismantle freedom in America. (It’s worth noting that Pai previously worked as associate general counsel for Verizon Communications, one of the companies that would benefit greatly if his plan is pushed forward. It’s also worth noting that FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel has spoken out against Pai’s plan.)”.

One hopes there is not such a dictatorial and fascist approach here but, with the U.K.’s close ties with the U.S.; how long will it be until our Prime Minister considers such a movement?! Maybe it is Trump slowly turning into a communist dictator and turning his country into his own, twisted ideal of America. The sheer protest and backlash will make passing the ruling extremely risky. If the FCC’s appointed head – who used to be a successful lawyer – decides to kill net neutrality; it will change the way music is shared and enjoyed. The effect we will see through society will be profound and shocking: who knows how far the ban will go and how many restrictions there will be!

nets.jpg

IN THIS PHOTOFCC Chairman, Ajit Pai/PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

Over the past few months; we have been hearing about sex scandals and entertainment figures outed and accused. People, women mainly, have been coming through and offer criticism and condemnation to the accused. Their views have been angered and unifying: we are allowed to express ourselves in that way and, as a man, I learnt a lot from what was coming out – feeling shocked at those who shielded the guilty and those who committed the acts. I would not have heard about the extent of the scandals were it not for the Internet; the backlash and feedback would not have been known were it not for the Internet – many people would have been denied their voice and say. We have guidelines and laws at the moment which means, if someone trolls or creates hate, they will be punished. We do not operate in a society where the Internet is inaudible and glides by without judgement. If people access illegal content; if they contravene laws and guidelines, then the site/I.S.P. will take action. Away from that, we have the freedom to say what we want and express ourselves in any manner we feel fit. If someone like President Trump objects to what someone says on Twitter – aimed at him – then he can block them (I can only imagine how sore his fingers are!). He is someone who has turned governance and leadership into an electronic thing: he has little comment and connection with people; preferring to post garbage on his Twitter account and spreading hatred.

don.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

HE is allowed to say and do as he pleases: the proposed death of net neutrality would prohibit people other than him saying the same things as Trump. It is an irony that seems to be lost on him. The close allegiance and bond between Trump and less-than-popular leaders mean he is turning the country into a business. We all knew this when he took over. Trump does not run a country to benefit the people and moving the nation forward: the reason he wanted to get into the White House was to diversify and expand his business mantras and maxims on a worldwide, political stage. There is no difference between the businessman and President. Because of this; few can be surprised he is supporting and promoting n action that will limit freedom of speech and generate more money for him. If the regular service provider bans certain content and gets strict; people will be at the mercy of other Internet options. They might charge a lot more and, in an effort to have their voice and words heard, people will be spending a lot more money needlessly – that all gets filtered back to the U.S. The President is keen to preserve the Second Amendment. That says, in order to maintain a free state, everyone has the right to bear Arms and protect themselves. This old-age, idiotic hangover from centuries-past has resulted in gun massacres and mass murderers running wild.

em.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Eminem/PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

The President, in collusion with the gun nuts and those beholden to the U.S. Constitution, will never budge when it comes to guns – it means the nation is exposed to more bloodshed and endless deaths. If that so-called ‘inalienable’ right is stubbornly adhered to; why is someone like Trump so keen to block someone’s right to violate the First Amendment?! He has no respect for those who die due to gun violence; he has no regard for anyone who questions his actions and wants to exercise their First Amendment rights – he is turning the U.S. into a communist state. Whereas the likes of China are becoming less repressive and cruel: the U.S. is going the other way and losing a sense of liberty, freedom and the rights of the people. If there is an end to net neutrality then it can signal the end of musicians being able to talk about what they want. If someone has a comment about the President during a gig; that content could be blocked – and people would not be able to stream that performance. The same could be said of any studio material that is put into the ether. Anything the President deems to be controversial can be blocked or removed. How many musicians are going to be able to express themselves and release material as they always have?! With artists like Eminem gearing up new material; one wonders whether his music would see the light of day anywhere.

gun.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Stephanie Frey/Dreamstime

It might get exposure on the radio but there is a danger, even if the album does get onto Spotify, Amazon and iTunes: Internet service providers might be able to block certain content or raise prices; make access and availability more difficult. There are some who say the end of net neutrality is more business-minded than it is censorship-based: it will affect tariffs and pricing rather than an arbitrary blocking of content and sites. One cannot say this for sure until it is imposed and rolled-out. I will end things with a piece Digital Music News ran a few days ago - that explains what could happen to musicians:

What does this mean for the music industry?

Imagine this.  As an independent artist, you struggle to get noticed on the internet.  Today, to make a living, you (or your band) may sell, distribute and promote your music.  Streaming platforms like Spotify and Apple Music may offer subsistence, but direct online sales of merchandise and concert tickets may offer a bigger payout.

If (and when) the FCC eliminates net neutrality rules, larger companies could easily lobby for ‘premium prioritization.’  This means that consumers would have to pay more to access their favorite sites.  Your website may not make the list.

Access to the internet could become a two-tiered system based solely on financial success.

American ISPs would likely sell consumers faster access to sites.  Larger companies would quickly divert traffic away from smaller, independent websites that help musicians.  Popular social media networks, including Facebook and Twitter, could easily charge musicians more to promote their music.

DJS.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

Independent musicians, DJs, producers, and bands, meanwhile, would face rapid marginalization.  Major music labels (Sony, UMG, and WMG) could pay Facebook to promote big-name artists like Taylor Swift and Adele.  Users on these platforms, and even on video services (YouTube, Vimeo), would constantly see ads for these big names.

Indie artists could face an uphill battle just to get noticed.

That’s on the artist side.  But what about smaller, independent streaming platforms?  Would Spotify, Apple Music, and Amazon Music pay to have faster access to their platforms?  If users pay higher rates for quicker access to more-popular platforms, what would happen to artists on SoundCloud?

Others could also get shorted.  Drip by Kickstarter and Patreon would soon become a less attractive platform for musicians and content creators.  Fans would likely access their favorite music on YouTube, a platform with mostly terrible payouts.  As a result, the value gap would also grow wider.

In the end, musicians would live the worst-case scenario: a lopsided music industry favoring the strong.

According to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, eliminating net neutrality rules would actually promote investment and innovation.  Internet service providers wouldn’t have to worry about “rate regulation and other heavy-handed oversight.”  Pai added that the FCC would “relinquish any authority over Internet traffic exchange.”

With an incentive to provide faster connections to websites, ISPs could form alliances with larger companies.  They could then offer consumers “bundles of services and creative pricing.”  Given the success of these partnerships, international ISPs may quickly follow suit with similar deals.

greed.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

While the FCC would no longer regulate ISPs, the FTC would face the daunting task of protecting the American consumer.  Yet, some groups claim that the FTC would have limited power to enforce fair business practices. The National Hispanic Media Coalition wrote,

There is a lot of confusion and predictions but one thing is for sure: the way we use the Internet will change; what we say and how much we can put online will be endangered. I worry anything deemed anti-Trump or controversial could be deemed unworthy of visibility and oxygen. This could extend to having views about celebrities who commit crimes and limit the amount that can be said again them. As the above article shows; the problems facing independent, new artists could be tire – placing a strain on their future and growth. There is no need to kill net neutrality and it seems like another move for Trump in his zeal to strangle his nation and mould it according to his own vision. There will be limiting of free speech and expression – despite what some commentators are saying! – and the business side of music will turn on acts and make life very unsure for them. There is no real way of saying just how damaging things will be but one thing is for sure: the end of net neutrality will change things for the worse. I hope it does not extend to the U.K. and impact our artists: American musicians and creatives are going to see the way they release music and communicate challenged and changed. At a time when free speech and conversation is bringing justice and much-needed dialogue in the world of entrainment: what Trump and the FCC are proposing will be…

image.png

PHOTO CREDIT: Press/Getty Images

A hugely unwise move!

FEATURE: Album of the Year: Lorde - Melodrama

FEATURE:

 

Album of the Year:

melo.jpg

Lorde - Melodrama

___________

IT was a pretty close-run thing but, in a list with heavy…

lorde.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Andrew Whitton

learning toward males artists: it was a very special album from Lorde that made the biggest impact this year. I will talk more about Melodrama but, when it comes my favourite records of 2017; there is an interesting and varied blend to be found. Lorde beat out Kendrick Lamar’s DAMN. and Benjamin Clementine’s I Tell a Fly; Wolf Alice’s Vision of a Life and St. Vincent’s Masseduction; Baxter Dury’s Prince of Tears and Dizzee Rascal’s Raskit; Lucy Rose’s Something’s Changing and Robert Plant’s Carry FireQueens of the Stone Age’s Villains making its way into the high spots! Those albums are in no particular order, either: I would actually put Queens’, Benjamin Clementine and Wolf Alice in the next three spots; Raskit would be challenging in the top-five. It’s not a huge male majority but there are bands in there – the overall body-count tips in favour of the guys. It is, therefore, quite pleasing to see the youngest female in the top-ten get the honours. That sounds condescending but it is not meant to be: Melodrama is a stunning album that has already been dubbed NME’s favourite L.P. of the year. It is not often I side with the ailing publication but, on this occasion, they were right on the money – even if the remainder of their top-ten contained a couple of duds...

New Zealand-born Lorde caused an enormous wave of excitement where Melodrama was released back in June. The weather was hot but few could have predicted something as intense and bright as Melodrama. Lorde’s debut album, Pure Heroine, was released in 2013 and was a smash with critics. They noted its maturity and unique lyrical personality; the striking vocals and incredibly memorable tracks. There were some who were less-than-positive but the majority of critics threw their weight behind the record and marked Lorde out as an icon to watch – the then-teenager was lauded and lifted above the musical crowd! It was not a surprise to see the talented songwriter take a bit of time to craft her sophomore album: the fact it was a four-year wait created some nerves and doubts.

singles.jpg

When Royal Blood and London Grammar returned this year with their sophomore albums; there was a real concern from both – each act repeating what they put onto their debut without adding anything new; each record weaker than their debuts. Maybe that problem arose from the fact they have very defined sounds and it would have been a risky venture adding too many new genres and sides to their music – the long gaps between records, one feels, would have afforded the chance for originality and innovation. Both British acts were busy touring after their debut and that fatigue/lack of studio time meant weaker second albums than we all expected. Lorde might have fallen into the same trap. She was elevated from an unknown musician to a global megastar when her debut album hit the shelves. She embarked on international touring and was on the cover of magazines; featured on radio stations around the world and under the spotlight. Considering her music, that appeared on the debut, was unique and personal meant a rapid follow-up was not likely. She needed time to craft songs and let inspiration find her – some time to write between gigs and find moments to put her thoughts on the page. I sighed a bit when the years went by and we entered 2017 – and still no sign of a new Lorde album!

Maybe the pressure had got to the young songwriter; the expectation too fierce – perhaps Pure Heroine was a strange and beautiful one-off....The first signs of new Lorde life – aside from some marketing hype and teasers – was the incredible lead-off single, Green Light. Anyone who feared Lorde was not match-fit had to eat their words when that song arrived. Its video saw the heroine dancing through the streets and casting her spell wherever she stepped. I am not usually predisposed to embrace a Pop album: even if it is a sophisticated and deep one. Last year, my favourite album was Billie Marten’s Writing of Blues and Yellows: this year, I was expecting Kendrick Lamar to stay in my mind; maybe a late effort from Björk could prize the award from Lorde’s grasp?! I am still letting Utopia settle and Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds made a noble charge with Who Built the Moon? Neither album could shift the passion I have for Melodrama.

It won me around because it is unconventional and unexpected. There are nods to the 1980s in terms of the big sounds and incredible sense of fun – even if the production values keep it in 2017. There are swathes of 1990s and early-2000s Pop, too – she spanned the decades and managed to inject so many different sounds and ideas into one record! Some have described the album as a concept, of sorts. Lorde struggled with some of the writing. False-stars and fruitless detours were not helped by a break-up from her long-term boyfriend, James Lowe (in 2015). It is hard to see past that split and how it infused and inspired some of Melodrama’s most potent and personal poetry. The album explores solitude but there is that location of a house-party: the heroine letting loose one moment; playing the acid-lipped vixen in another room; moving to contemplative and mournful in another – aware and awakened the next moment. Written and produced alongside Jack Antonoff; there are contributions from Frank Dukes, Malay; Andrew Wyatt and others. I read interviews where Lorde provided insight into her creative process and the artists who inspired Melodrama.

nebie.jpg

Paul Simon and Joni Mitchell were named as guides. It is easy to see aspects of Graceland and albums like Blue/Both Sides Now on Melodrama. A lot of contemporary Pop/mainstream stars do not cast their mind back or have a huge knowledge of older music – taking impetus from their peers and producing music somewhat one-dimensional and plastic. There is soul and intelligence running through Melodrama; immense nuance and songs that have their own identity and nature – no two songs alike; each one engrossing and captivating. Green Light is the racing opener and first track written for Melodrama. When speaking with Pitchfork; she explained the song’s birth and formation:

The song is really about those moments kind of immediately after your life changes and about all the silly little things that you gravitate towards. I say, 'She thinks you love the beach, you're such a liar.' What the fuck, she thinks you like the beach?! You don't like the beach! It's those little stupid things. It sounds so happy and then the lyrics are so intense obviously. And I realized I was like, 'how come this thing is coming out so joyous sounding?' And I realized this is that drunk girl at the party dancing around crying about her ex-boyfriend who everyone thinks is a mess. That's her tonight and tomorrow she starts to rebuild. And that's the song for me”.

sigh.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Mark Mahaney for TIME

There is a bit of Florence + the Machine’s jangling, big piano work; there are cheerier big moments but the mood is one of reflection and heartbreak. Compelled by her first heartbreak; Green Light is that acceptance of longing – moving on and trying to make sense of things. The first-written song for the album was going to be a natural opener and debut single – it is the core and heart of the record; it contains all Lorde’s much-loved D.N.A. and incredible songwriting. One can hear Lorde taking control and having more say in the production; ensuring the song was just as she wanted it to sound. Sober and The Louvre paint pictures – quite appropriate given the title of the latter! Sober is a more emotional and revealing song whereas The Louvre more scenic and descriptive – one could imagine standing alongside the heroine and following the story. Liability and Writer in the Dark are two of the strongest songs Lorde has ever come up with! Writer in the Dark is about deceit and leading someone astray; the dangers of trusting her and playing folly with emotions – telling the boy never to trust someone like her. Liability shows the sort of emotions and pains deep in Lorde’s heart: a raw and revealing diary-note that could have been ripped from the pages of any young woman’s thoughts – expressing the same sort of romantic pains and inner-reflections many experience.

Super Cut and Perfect Places incredibly striking and gripping. The latter, in a way, is the reward after the reveals: in the middle of the party and listening to her own voice; not following muses and anyone else – returning to the same place you were in to start with. That is what makes the finale so intriguing and unique: a young artist who is immersed in parties and chaos; looking for somewhere better before realising she is in the same state she always was. The entire record is a look at the break-up and wreckage of love and the way it has affected her; growing out of her teenager skin and trying to start a new phase – Melodrama is, perhaps, not a bad title considering the times and tribulations documented throughout.

I feel it is the perfect record for 2017: an artist who took time to create something special and not rush-release an album; managing to top her debut and break new ground. Nobody this year has crafted anything as mesmeric and populist as Lorde. Critics were fast to add their words and praise. AllMusic was filled with love (…”Instead, Lorde is embracing all the possibilities the world has to offer but then retreating to the confines of home, so she can process everything she's experienced. This balance between discovery and reflection gives Melodrama a tension, but the addition of genuine, giddy pleasure -- evident on the neon pulse of "Homemade Dynamite" and "Supercut" -- isn't merely a progression for Lorde, it's what gives the album multiple dimensions”); The Telegraph was hardly ambivalent with their assessment (“Her distinctive melodic style and hip hop rhythmic flow actually risks getting a bit dully repetitive if the content was not so strong and the arrangements so carefully fashioned and consistently surprising. What is truly fantastic about Lorde is that here is an original, emotional, intellectual, imaginatively audacious singer-songwriter operating at the highest artistic level yet putting it across as easy-access modern mainstream pop. Melodrama deserves to be a blockbuster”)...

NME, a little smitten, too (“It’s a rudely excellent album, introspective without ever being indulgent, OTT in all the right ways, honest and brave, full of brilliant songs with lyrics to chew over for months. The message might be that Lorde considers herself wild and flawed and bruised (“I’ll love you till you call the cops on me,” she sings, on the deliciously bitter ‘Writer In The Dark’), but we all do sometimes. That’s the neatest trick the album pulls off – universal connection, in spite of the squad and the praise and the superstardom and the pressure. Humanity intact. Artistry assured. Brilliance confirmed”). The latter named it their favourite album of 2017: I expect many other big-name publications to follow suit!

I think it will be a two-horse-race when it comes to that ‘Album of 2017’ leadership: Kendrick Lamar’s DAMN. is natural competition. Two more different albums/humans could you meet – I think Lorde has the edge over the phenomenal Lamar. Whoever is the critical winner come the end of this year; I am going to remain with Lorde and keep the album in my number-one position. It is a fantastic work that deserves to be heard for years to come. One wonders what the next step is for the New Zealander. The gap between albums number-one and two was due to a romance split and some half-formed sketches – songs not forming quickly and Lorde having to deal with a lot of upset. I am not sure whether she is in a relationship now but one assumes/hopes the period between now and her third album will not have the same turmoil and upset – she is in her twenties and has learned how capricious love can be. Whether she ponders increased fame and a new phase of life on her third record, I am not sure... 

news.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Mark Mahaney for TIME

When that will come, again, is down to her – let’s hope there is a shorter wait than we had for Melodrama! I am still listening to Melodrama five months after its release. It is a record that provides new life and interest every time you put it on; there are no limits to its potential and the feelings it provokes. That is an amazing feat from someone so young and fresh in the music world! Lorde is not your average artist, mind. You never know what to expect from her, when it comes to themes and songs, but we have come to rely on that unimpeachable quality and wonder. Lorde has so many years ahead and I cannot wait to see what she comes up with next. Melodrama is a peerless record from a musical treasure; a unique songwriter and…

LORDES.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Garth Badger

A truly special artist.

FEATURE: I Guess That’s Why They Call It True: Fifty Years of Elton John and Bernie Taupin

FEATURE:

 

I Guess That’s Why They Call It True:

john.jpg

 PHOTO CREDIT: Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images 

Fifty Years of Elton John and Bernie Taupin

___________

A week is a long time in politics…

ELT.jpg

 PHOTO CREDITGetty Images  

it was once said: fifty years is a fuc*ing long time in music! There are few today who will forge a fifty-year career – I don’t think anyone will, in fact! For every artist like Robert Plant, Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan and Mick Jagger: there are endless parades of half-formed acts that are not really equipped for longevity and innovation. Times have changed and are not as conducive to the sort of epic careers that began in the 1950s/1960s. The Internet and near-bursting-point of modern music mean it is really difficult maintaining a career of such extreme years. That is not a bad thing but one thing made me look at another aspect of music: the songwriting partnership. You don’t really get them anymore, do you?! Paul McCartney and John Lennon; Mick Jagger and Keith Richards; the theatrical greats and less-than-modern Pop writers like Paul Heaton and Dave Rotheray – it seems their days were a long time ago. Modern music, normally, is done by sole writers or groups: it is rare to find a solid and enduring partnership that remains over multiple albums and decades. Then again, they do not make them like Sir Elton John and Bernie Taupin anymore! A few days ago; the partnership celebrated fifty years of collaboration – Elton John marked seventy years on Earth, too. That milestone (the former) amazed me and compelled me to revisit the back-catalogue of one of music’s finest-ever duos. Even though Elton John’s debut album, Empty Sky, was released in 1969: the songwriting duo of John and Taupin started a couple of years previous. It is debatable when they started writing together – whether it was earlier in 1967 or November; later that month or earlier in the year. BBC Radio 2 put out a show (last week) that spoke with the men behind the music:

The interview is an illuminating and fascinating insight into that makes the friends tick and bond. Even though the duo has been writing together for fifty years; they were not exactly slow off the mark when it came to quality songs and albums. In fact; the second Elton John record, Elton John, was a big commercial success and favourite. Released in 1970; tracks like Your Song and Take Me to the Pilot showed Elton John’s gift for melody/music; Taupin’s unique lyrical style. Tumbleweed Connection (1970) and Madman Across the Water (1971) strengthened that bond and saw the songwriters hailed as modern innovators. If it was Elton John’s voice that was heard on the radio; few could ignore the impact Bernie Taupin made then – and still does to this very day. Madman Across the Water features Tiny Dancer: one of the first big hits for Elton John; one of the best songs from the early-1970s. Maybe the biggest early smash for the duo was 1973’s Goodbye Yellow Brick Road. For that record; Taupin wrote the lyrics in under three weeks; John composing the music in three days as he stayed at the Pink Flamingo Hotel in Jamaica – the reason for that location was because The Rolling Stones recorded Goats Head Soup there! It shows how easily and natural Taupin and John worked alongside one another – in any location, it seemed!

goodbye.jpg

Whereas one envisages the early days of Lennon and McCartney being two chaps sitting around a piano swapping lines and choruses: I imagine the structure and dynamic of John and Taupin as a bit more distance and compartmentalised. It is clear they had an incredible respect and understanding from the start – how much of the complete process was recorded together, in the same room is unclear. With huge and eclectic hits like Goodbye Yellow Brick Road, Candle in the Wind and Bernie and the Jets – and Saturday Night’s Alright for Fighting – making 1973 a sensational year – that was not the end of it! 1974’s Grammy-nominated Caribou contained The Bitch Is Back; 1975’s Captain Fantastic and the Brown Dirt Cowboy had Someone Saved My Life Tonight; Blue Moves was lucky enough to include Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word! I have included a playlist at the bottom of this feature: the authoritative and comprehensive list of Taupin/John hits. It shows how incredibly varied and inventive the music was. Whether you are a fan of John’s incredible instinct and musicianship or Taupin’s storytelling and standout lines – there wasn’t another duo like them around! If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards are the only songwriting duo who can match Taupin/John – they have been around longer but it is a close call! – they don’t, in my view, have the same width and consistency.

blue.jpg

There was a period – between Blue Moves in 1976 and 1983’s Too Low for Zero – when the quality dipped. John worked with a couple of other songwriters and there was a slight loss of momentum. Too Low for Zero roared back with I’m Still Standing (an appropriate title if ever there was!) and, in my humble opinion, the duo’s defining moment: I Guess That’s Why They Call It the Blues (I know Davey Johnstone co-wrote the music but let’s not split hairs!). The partnership was reformed and John agreed to work full-time with Taupin again – the details of their separation and experimentation should not go into a feature that celebrates their unity. The fact of the matter remains: it is no coincident the poorer albums of that time (1976-1983) broke the solid and tested John/Taupin unit. It’s true some of the later albums of the 1980s were not the finest from the duo – 1986’s Leather Jackets is retched; Reg Strikes Back was not as solid and redemptive as its title suggested – but they were back on a more even keel come the 1990s. Many have argued the duo’s 2000s songwriting was as sharp and solid as their 1970s cannon. Although there were fewer big hits and radio smashes: the quality and depth explored by Taupin and John continued to stagger and confound critics. 2016’s Wonderful Crazy Night is the most recent offering from the songwriting geniuses. One knows they will continue to write together until they both run out of breath – let us hope that is not for another couple of decades!

el.jpg

Before I wrap up – and underline why Bernie Taupin and Elton John are invaluable and pioneering – I wanted to source from Elton John’s official website. This year, when talking about his partnership with Taupin - he explained why it worked and has remained to this very day:

It’s the same excitement now as when we first started. That this year marks the 50th anniversary of my partnership with Bernie Taupin is mind boggling for me because it seems like only yesterday that I met him. It’s an amazing achievement to stay with one person for 50 years on a creative basis, in an industry where that doesn’t really happen very much.”

When it came to the, potentially prickly, subject of reaching his seventieth birthday; John had this to say:

I’m interested in moving forward all the time, with what I create, my collaborations, and also with discovering the work of other people. I think age is immaterial, provided we keep our minds alive by being open to new things. I can be as excited by a new artist who plays me their demo as I am by a new record of one of my musical heroes. I can be excited by playing a new city I’ve never played before, or revisiting somewhere I know well and seeing how it’s changed. Life is a constant state of flux for us all, and I like to embrace that. I also feel very happy to use my position to bring attention to injustice in the world and to try to help where I can. At this time in my life, I’m the happiest I have ever been.”

elto.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT@eltonofficial

Bernie said of Elton:

It’s been an unconventional partnership and while we pretty much patented the two-rooms technique I’d venture to say you’d be hard pressed to find a couple of songwriters more in sync with each other and their craft.”

As Taupin said himself: they mastered that two-room working environment but remained in-sync and completely connected from the very start. The fact they are friends and colleagues fifty years after their first song means they are doing something right! I worry modern songwriting is defined by isolation or too many cooks – the biggest stars of today having their music penned by an array of hired-guns and producers! Maybe things have changed to the extent we will never see a partnership quite like Elton John and Bernie Taupin. That is sad in itself but we are very lucky to have the epic and incredible legends in our midst – this country is masterful when it comes to those world-class songwriting duos! Let’s hope the partnership remains for another couple of decades (Elton will be kicking arse and causing havoc when he is in his nineties, for sure!). I will lend this by bringing in a recent interview - the duo conducted with Cameron Crowe – who has been a fan of the two for years.

EJ.jpg

The interview is illuminating and filled with affection – there were two questions that stood out. The first one drilled back to those first few days:

Cameron Crowe: You two met in ’67, when Bernie answered an ad in the New Musical Express newspaper for a writing job at Liberty Records. Elton answered the same ad. Neither passed the audition, but you came together as collaborators, just about 50 years ago. Knowing what you now know about each other, would you go back and repeat this same relationship again?

Bernie Taupin: Undoubtedly. I think one of the things that kept us together for so long is the vast differences in our personalities; anybody who’s followed our careers would see that pretty easily. If we had been at all the same make-up in our characteristics, it probably wouldn’t have lasted.

Elton John: I love Bernie more than I’ve ever done and I think he feels the same way about me, because we’ve led separate lives. We don’t live in each other’s back pockets. We are totally different. He is the Brown Dirt Cowboy, and I am Captain Fantastic. That’s how it turned out and I wouldn’t have it any other way”.

The second question was a simpler one: how they went about writing a hit:

BT I’ve always maintained that if you can play an instrument, you have the potential to write a song.

EJ Writing has changed so much these days. Eleven people wrote “Uptown Funk”. If you’re an artist, or if you want to be an artist, you go and play – you get a band together or you go and play live. Ed Sheeran, who is signed to our management company, started out playing in people’s living rooms and busking. You cannot buy experience. Go out if you’ve got a guitar or piano; play in a bar, in a hotel. If I’m in a hotel, I always go up to the piano player and say: “How are you doing?” Because there, but for the grace of God, go I.

BT It’s like Bruce Springsteen said: I learned more from a three-minute record than I ever learned in school”.

DO1oa2fX0AAdlEB.jpg

PHOTO CREDITGetty Images  

If the early incarnation of Bernie Taupin and Elton John spawned those big hits – that continued into the 1970s – their modern work is not exactly shoddy and meagre. They have love and affection for one another; there is that determination to keep exploring and pushing. Fifty years down the line and the partnership shows no signs of breaking. Bernie Taupin and Elton John act as guidelines and mentors for modern duos who want to have the same legacy and respect as them. At a time when there are whores of committee-written songs and talented solo artists: what place for the classic songwriting duo?! Maybe they are a product of past decades but I’d like to think, somewhere in the world, there is a potential John and Taupin waiting to meet one another! What form they take – and what music they write – there is a desperate need for their bond and survival. Keith Richards and Mick Jagger and not really writing together at the moment: it means John and Taupin are a rare and special force. As we crave and search for a duo that could replace Elton John and Bernie Taupin – the established and inimitable duo are not going anywhere soon! As the music world celebrates the icons and congratulates fifty superb years of memorable music; things are clear and obvious:

do.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Kevin Mazur/WireImage

THE bitch is not going anywhere!

FEATURE: Let’s NOT Talk About Sex: The Dating Life of the Modern Musician

FEATURE:

 

Let’s NOT Talk About Sex:

sex.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty 

The Dating Life of the Modern Musician

___________

IN a piece tomorrow…

date.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

I will look at the idea of net neutrality: there are plans to ban it and, with that, it would take power from independent musicians and eliminate free-speech. I am concerned there are higher-ups who are trying to take powers and expression way from people. It is a subject that will rage on and will reach its peak next month – protests will be held on 7th to stop the FCC killing the Internet as we know it. I will talk about the effect this will have on musicians – and the ramifications of possible changes – but it got me thinking about the safety and rights of musicians. I wanted to raise a subject, now, that has been put to the front of my mind the last couple of days. I know many female musicians and quite a few of them are single. The demands of the industry means the day is spent working (at a regular job) or promoting your sounds: the nights, often involve social media time and more promotion. If the weekends, to most, offer a chance to run into the wild and neglect the need to obsesses over work we hate: for musicians; there is no such relief and downtime. I am in that boat, too. I spend most of my available time, away from work, writing.

uns.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

Sat at a laptop – with a wall for a view – is, perhaps, not the best way to spend my time on Earth but the rewards I get (seeing musicians get their work to new audiences) provides satisfaction. At the end of it all; I have the desire to make this thing a full-time career and give up the daily drudge. The female artists I know have this desire and hunger – there are men who fall into this argument, too. We all need to relax and kick back: dating and love is a good way of doing that. Even if you’re in an industry as hectic and demanding as music; you need to think about relationships and yourself – it cannot always be about work and stress. The modern way of working means artists/music creatives have to rely on the Internet to find love. There is an array of dating websites that cover all tastes and demands. Whether you pay for a subscription – or have a free trial – it means you have access to thousands of available singletons. I think men are at risk of this but it mainly applies to women: the dangers of the Internet and the type of ‘catch’ you will find there. It seems odd mentioning it on a music blog but I feel musicians are among the busiest around. Their lives are packed and it can often be hard to schedule any time for sex – let alone love or anything long-term.

issues.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

It might seem sexist saying females are more vulnerable but is the opposite: it is men who create the danger and have raised alarm.  I have heard stories, over the past few weeks, of female musicians taking to dating sites in the hope of finding a companion – the horror stories and testimonies that have come back go beyond the comical or peculiar. I know one or two women who, after trial-and-error and a marathon, have found someone who isn’t a complete degenerate. There are, however, so many who are either being bombarded by lurid comments and innuendo; sent explicit pictures and asked to perform pornographic acts – all before they have even met or spoken to one another! Maybe this is the way the modern world is changing: the Internet means there are more people out there; more ways people can get in touch; fewer barriers and vast opportunities to commit crimes and behave appallingly. The fact the Internet creates great access around the world is a bittersweet blessing/curse – it can be great for music and promotion but not so reliable when it comes to human relationships! I am not talking about some harmless misunderstandings and ill-advised comments: there are actual offences and perversities committed! That may not seem shocking or unusual in this age. That, in itself, says a lot about our generation and the way they abuse technology/others. I was affected by a recent story – she will remain anonymous – where a female musician set up a date with a man and came away having to report a crime.

dates.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

The details were not disclosed but it left her shocked, appalled and scarred. That is something nobody wants to see and it makes me wonder how many women are at-risk and vulnerable. I mention this in the context of musicians because they have so little time free – the Internet can be the easiest option and a way of connecting with others. Even if the interaction (online) is agreeable and pleasant; that does not mean the person you will meet during that date acts the same way. I guess that is the risk with any blind dates but one can find a lot more seediness and unseemly men on the Internet than via the conventional blind date channels. I have heard similar stories from someone who is a successful beauty blogger – she has been on a string of dates and, with each man, has found things that have turned her stomach (not so much to turn her head!). Maybe this is a problem consistent with other industry but it seems creatives, musicians especially, are falling prey to some horrible deplorable characters. Maybe songwriters/musicians go for a particular type but I am concerned the industry itself is becoming less sociable. My proposed solutions are a little contradictory: having a bespoke, and safe, dating website; making sure there are more social outlets for musicians who are busy with work. If one has to go down the Internet route – the cost of endless dating and commuting means electronic contact is more practical – that does not mean they have to subject themselves to a torrent of smut, creepiness and, at times, assault.

horro.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

I have mentioned a couple of women but, when talking about their experiences, there has been actual abuse and criminality. I cannot guarantee that any new dating website will keep the creeps out; nor will it guarantee those who join are dependable and decent – there needs to be something done that protects women. I know there has been some specialised music dating websites. I do not think any of them are that successful or discussed. Certainly, from my experience, websites like Match.com, Plenty of Fish and eHarmony UK are the big boys. If you have the need - and feel like you need something more highbrow – then you can join websites where they are more thorough with their schematics and algorithms. All of these sites have their pitfalls and traps – Tinder, actually, seems to be the worst of them. I cannot say whether there is a psychological correlation between the type of man that frequents Tinder – and those who go on to make women feel uncomfortable. If there was a website that was reserved to musical personnel – D.J.s, musicians and D.J.s; producers, directors and the like – then that would erase so many potential misfits; mean there was a common thread and the users would instantly have more in common with one another. The name is not easy to get – one feels the word ‘strings’ would have to come in; No-Strings-Attached might suggest something casual and sex-based – but that would come in time. We need something that provides this safe haven and is properly invigilated. Moderators and ‘Internet police’ can keep an eye on comments and make sure there is more thorough vetting when people subscribe. It should be charged but not so artists/musicians are priced-out and feel pinched.

datesss.jpg

PHOTO CREDITZoneCreative

One could, quite easily, create an online portal/website that was a community for music-lovers and musicians. It need not be anything as defined as a dating website: a lot of artists, who are single, are looking for friendship and company as much as love. There is that option where one could easily communicate with someone who shares the same passions – those passions are kept pure (until appropriate) in an environment that is warm and friendly. Anyone caught contravening and contradicting the codes of the site would be swiftly and permanently ejected. I have been speculating and playing with the idea of a music website for a few years now – maybe that is an incorporation I could make! What we do need (myself included) is a site where the artist/creative can go and chat if they want to; they can agree to meet for a chat; they can organise a date – without fear of discrimination, attack or abuse. That might sound simple but, in reality, most of the dating sites around will feature the worse elements. The new site – whatever it will be named – would be a lot firmer with regards those who perpetrate false morals; provide greater surveillance and ensure any women (or man) who is being spoken to in degrading terms would be protected. I, for one, would welcome a dating/friendship site that was reserved for people like me; where I could get quality and familiarity – getting that convenience and conviviality into the bargain!

cafe.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Unsplash

Whilst is paramount we purify Internet dating and make sure female musicians – and anyone who uses them – do not feel threatened and unsafe; there is a school of thought that argues getting out into the ‘real world’ is a better option. I have said how many artists/writers do not have a bag of time to go out meeting potential mates. If we were to combine music/work into a more sociable environment then that, one would hope, gets rid of the issue?! I know there are gigs and bars but they can often be crowded and reserved for those who want to watch artists – rather than chat and flirt. Coffee shops are an option but is there something especially for a musician? Whether it is as extensive as creating bars/cafes that tailor to the dating/work-life demands of musicians/artists, I am not sure. It would be good to turn existing venues/spaces into places those harried and stressed can go and relax. Maybe having a dating/socialising night would be a solution. There would be music but the atmosphere would be curating to promote fun and a degree of peace–keeping the sworded types out of the door and making the environment sociable and secure. There are dating nights and special events for people to meet others but so much of the time people have to use the Internet for their dating needs. There is, as I have outlaid, ways of making a site that erases (most of) the dangers and is a spot where similarly-minded folks can chat (and more).

streets.jpg

PHOTO CREDITCheapMadness

How does one replicate that for the real-world streets?! One need only walk through a city like London and realise how busy and sociable it is. A lot of this ‘socialising’ can involve a lot of alcohol and the liaisons born from this can be rather brief and forgettable – where one picks up their underwear with a sore head and regrets everything. The focus is not on sex and instant gratification: ensuring musicians/artists can find love/companions that last a long time. Not only will that strip away the degradation experienced when navigating the likes of Tinder: it means they have stressed relieved and get to experience love. I am seeing too many people – mainly females, to be honest – who are meeting dodgy men and bemoaning the lack of quality out there. Their time is precious and the strike-rate on dating sites is not always that high. I would welcome a new website but feel one could easily utilise somewhere like a café and host dating nights. Maybe it does not need to have that pretence: organise a sociable gig/gathering and singles, if they choose, can go there and mingle in a space they feel comfortable in. The Internet provides a place where those shyer and more nervous can project confidence and not have to feel intimidated. I know many balk at the concept of chatting to the opposite sex in intimate terms. The Internet prevents instant nerves but, in the long-run, it makes bonding a lot harder.

pin.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Pinterest

I agree modern dating and socialising is expensive; we do not all have time of an evening to go out and meet people – or go to bars in the hope somewhere, someone will be spark a fuse. The problem with relying on the traditional dating sites is there are too many bad experiences. Some of these might be amusing but, when you put them all together, what effect is this having on confidence and emotional well-being? A man/woman might be lovely and attractive but, given the way others treat them, be fooled into thinking they are the problem. The immeasurable psychological impact means many will stop dating and trying to find someone. That can then lead to severe emotional issues and depression – they might never feel safe and confident meeting anyone. Music demands attention and passion but there are so many out there who have passion and time left to give to someone else. Creating nights/spaces where people can dance, chat and meet – like a club/pub but better music/people there – would be a good idea. With so many venues closing; one wonders how people are spending their nights. Maybe the cost of licenses is an issue: maybe people are going out less because they find it cheaper staying in. I know there are artists, musicians and talent out there who are being hurt by Internet dating and want to connect with a nice, decent human being. I am concerned the Internet is not protecting people and, for those women who are victims of predators and the perverse, the penalties are either non-existent or not strict enough.

kisses.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

Let’s create – either a dating website or bespoke nights/locations – where we can feel comfortable in and, one hopes, discover people a lot nicer and more attractive (than what lurks on dating sites). If we can do that, and allow musicians a better and more sociable balance, that will not only impact on their wellbeing and happiness – it will result in better music and an industry where those looking for love are not frustrated and depressed to the extent of serious emotional damage. It is another concern that needs addressing but it can be done. In it 2017 and single people should not have to feel bad about their status: they should not, if they choose to change it, have to struggle so hard to avoid catfishes. The world is getting darker and more stressful: the need for love and togetherness is at the forefront of everyone’s minds. Dating and love is not reserved to a particular class or human…

pins.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Pinterest

IT is something we all deserve!

FEATURE: And Dream of Sheep: Why Sleep Deprivation and Pressure is Damaging Musicians’ Health

FEATURE:

 

And Dream of Sheep:

sleep.jpg

Why Sleep Deprivation and Pressure is Damaging Musicians’ Health

___________

ONE of the growing problems I am discovering…

laptop.jpg

ALL PHOTO/IMAGE CREDITS (unless stated): Getty

in the music industry is the poor emotional health of artists. I have discussed mental-health in depth, but this is a lot less complex – how so many musicians are not getting a lot sleep and, because of that, it is impacting on their career. Not only does a lack of sleep cause discoordination, fatigue and depression – it creates physical issues and can affect health in the long-term. I will bring in an interesting argument/article that theorises the benefits of insomnia; how it can promote creativity and is beneficial to musicians. To me, where I will bring in some supportive pieces, there is too much pressure from the music industry. I will bring in ‘periphery’ concerns such as high rent prices and competition but, from a health perceptive, it is troubling seeing so many musicians unable to sleep adequately. One of the biggest contributors to the problem is the amount of stress a modern musician faces. The need to get gigs and earn a crust means (musicians) have to work longer hours and are unable to switch off. Music has, over recent years, become a digital-heavy industry; one where artists can control their environment through laptops and technology. Social media is a useful tool for artists: the fact they are spending so much time on it is having a detrimental effect. To maintain a career in music – without considering success and growth – the sheer determination and work ethic is driving many to extraordinary lengths. I have spoken to a number of musicians and there is a direct connection between their sleep problems and the hours they have to pull.

social.jpg

Social media is a great way of getting music out there. It gets sounds to the people readily and quickly but so much of it is tied to popularity and marketing, Musicians cannot put a song out there and see it grow – able to sit back and have other people do all the work. You can say that has always been the way with music but the growth of competition, combined with the digitisation of music, means so many of us are unable to extricate ourselves from technology. I will go on but, to bring some black-and-white science to the fore; here is an interesting article that shows the extent of the problem.

The National Institutes of Health estimates that roughly 30% of the general population suffers from sleep disruption. According to the American Psychological Association, most healthy adults do best with 16 hours of wakefulness and an average of eight hours of sleep per night. However, individual needs can vary from requiring as little as six to up to 10 hours of sleep per night. Sleep requirements do not decline with age, though the ability to sleep soundly may.

Sleep experts cite stress as the number one cause of acute sleep problems. You’re worried about an upcoming gig, which causes you not to be able to sleep, and pretty soon you are also worried about not getting enough sleep. In this way, anxiety and insomnia exacerbate each other. Yoga, meditation, and other mind-body relaxation techniques can often help you cope.

fly.jpg

 Travel, especially when you cross time zones, can upset your biological (circadian) rhythms. Compound that with being in a strange place, and you have a recipe for exhaustion. Environmental factors like a room that’s too cold or hot, noisy, or bright, may be beyond your control on the road.

Inadequate sleep will reduce your musical abilities, overall wellbeing, and quality of life. Numerous studies have proven that inadequate sleep can cause reduced cognitive functions, such as those needed for effective concentration and decision making. It can affect your irritability, patience, and ability to get along with others”.

cure.jpg

A little later, when bringing in a competing article, there are some interesting arguments that state a certain rationing of sleep can be beneficial for a creative brain. I worry success and survival is tied to numbers and scoreboards. There was, years ago, far fewer new musicians operating away from the mainstream. There was not the same problem we have now with artists having to sacrifice health and happiness in order to make a go of their chosen careers – by the same token; we are in a position when anyone can come into music and that, in turn, provides a huge and bountiful market for the public. Take a case-study of Musician A. She/he will release a new song and put it out to the world. It does not end there…over the course of days/weeks; Musician A monitors how it is doing and ensures the song gets out to radio stations and promoters. It is not over then. After that; they have to make sure the song gets on playlists and is shared on social media. Visibility is so much a part of the musician’s career. Many feel, if they take time off from social media and connecting with the digital world; their music will suffer and they will be overlooked. I am in the same position: writing endlessly in the hope someone, somewhere will see my work and give me an opportunity. Competition so stiff and vast, every artist around feels insecurity and is expected to work themselves half to death. Is that pressure coming from the artist or the industry?

studio.jpg

It is a subjective debate and it is not easy to answer. I feel there is more weight on the latter’s scales. Of the artists I have spoken to; they always come to the same conclusion: if I do not concrete my whole being to music, I will risk losing fans/following. That is paraphrasing, but the general gist is obvious: artists are sacrificing their free-time and health in order to maintain a music career. It is hard to say exactly how damaging the issue of insomnia and physiological strain is putting on the individual. It will vary person-to-person but it is clear something constructive needs to happen. I will move on to the cost of living, anxieties and relationships – before then; I found an interesting piece that explained why early rising can benefit the creative drive:

YOU HAVE LIMITED FOCUS.

We’ve all been there. You’ve just gotten home from work, maybe you still need to make dinner for yourself and all you want to do is sit on the couch and flip through your favorite TV shows or dig into some Netflix. You’re not alone. This is absolutely how everyone else feels after a long day at work too. Most work days, about 5 hours in- I am mentally fried. Later that night I go home and try to work on some memorization or sing through some music and it feels almost impossible to focus or retain information at that point. We only have a few good hours of focus in us per day. Make sure you’re using them wisely! Get up a couple hours before you have to go to work, and start hashing out some art! It’s the best way to truly make progress. Don’t wait until the day is over and you have nothing left to give. Put your passion first.

YOU WILL FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE "STOLEN HOURS" WITHOUT DISTRACTION.

When do you receive the most phone calls and texts? Generally after you and everyone else gets home from work. If everyone else is still sleeping or getting ready for work, chances are, you are going to get way fewer distractions. Hearing your phone buzzing or getting endless messages and e-mails can disrupt your practice in no time. Getting up earlier gives you the feeling that you have stolen some extra hours just for yourself.  Jump into your day with music FIRST.  There will be plenty of time to watch cute cat videos on your phone later.

sing.jpg

YOU WILL FEEL LESS GUILTY.

I don’t know about you, but I tend to let a lot of guilt creep up when I feel like I don’t give much focused attention to my art. I feel like it’s slipping away from me. I feel like I should be getting more done, or be further along in my studies. This is all part of the emotional roller coaster that we artists get to ride for our entire life!  Weeeee!  If I have already gotten events created, pictures posted, blogs written, songs practiced, and created posters for my next gig by the time I get to work, I come home feeling WAY less guilty. I don’t have to be a zombie attempting to practice after work AND be really sad about it too. Boom goes the dynamite.

YOU WILL WAKE UP WITH A PURPOSE.

If you have a solid reason WHY you need to be getting up in the morning, you’ll absolutely do it. I know that I wake up every morning wanting to get ready to make more music. You can either make art now, or make excuses later on. Period.

YOU WILL GET WAY MORE DONE.

It is truly amazing how much you can get done even if you wake up only 1 hour earlier than you did before. Maybe it’s the proximity to my coffee pot, or maybe it’s just that my brain is so fresh, but I can get about two or three times as much done BEFORE work, as I do after a long day.

music.jpg

YOU WILL HAVE GOTTEN THE PRODUCTIVITY BALL ROLLING.

Life is a series of tasks.  If you hop out of bed in the morning and you get straight to doing the work you were born to do, that creates a ripple affect in entire your day.  You will be more present at work and you will have more energy to manage the rest of the items on your daily to-do list. Bodies in motion tend to stay in motion. So start your day strong and create all the inertia that you can.

Some of the above is true and, by putting in an extra bit of work at the start of the day means there is time near the end to get to sleep early – decompress sooner than usual. The flaw with that debate is you are not gaining any more sleep-time. Perhaps there is the tactical psychology behind the reasoning – the consistency and quality of sleep is improved if you can detach in the evening hours – but I worry these points are a rather subjective and flawed viewpoint. Another article, from The Guardian a few years back, brought actor/musician Matt Berry together with Glass Animals’ frontman, Dave Bayley:

"When you're sleep-deprived I imagine it's quite similar to having taken certain drugs," says Bayley, who has a degree in neuroscience. "The logical side of your brain is slowly withering away because there's not enough energy to power it, and all these crazy ideas start happening that your brain would normally suppress. I find the brain a mystical beast. It's so bizarre and interesting."

dave.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Glass Animals' Dave Bayley

Berry had a similar experience in his studio, which has neither windows nor clocks. "It was kind of dreamlike. Sometimes I'd go back the next day and think: 'Wow. Some of it doesn't sound like me.' There are things I wouldn't have done during the day – lots of things coming in and out of focus."

 Some studies have suggested a correlation between creativity and sleep disturbance, known as "creative insomnia", although this has been disputed. There is, however, plenty of anecdotal evidence from musicians. Artists such as Chris Martin, Moby, Tricky and King Krule have all talked about finding sleepless nights inspiring as well as tormenting.

Unusually, Berry set out to make music that might help other people alleviate their insomnia. He abandoned plans to theme it around childhood or being underwater because he didn't want to trigger unpleasant memories in certain listeners. "I tried to make it interesting but I've left it as blank as I can," he says. "I've used basic elements such as water and air. Other than that, it's whatever images you can conjure up from it. I'm not trying to push anything on you".

phone.jpg

There are remedies, programmes and treatments that have been suggested for musical insomniacs – is that more a case of medicating rather than addressing? I have respect for Berry and Bayley’s experiences but they are in a privileged position. Most artists do not have the same opportunities and success as they do. The issue of sleep and an exhaustive schedule is not common to every new musician starting out. There are those who can balance the demands of the industry without sacrificing their well-being and sleep habits. The artists I am familiar with have to balance a full-time job with their music: working, essentially, two jobs in order to fund their passions. Many could claim musicians make the choice and do not have to follow their paths – that would be somewhat glib and unhelpful. I mentioned how rent prices are causing issues. We all know most of the labels and opportunities are based in London. Rent prices are much steeper in the capital than they are other parts of the country. Recent studies suggest things are levelling out but, at the moment, it is barely feasible for a musician to reside in the capital. I have seen many filled with ambition – looking to rent there – and have either found life too expensive or not been able to find a flat to begin with! Many who live outside London, where rent prices are cheaper, have the added stress of commuting and the costs associated with that.

place.jpg

I am looking for prices in London and the average room in a decent-ish London pad can be anywhere from £600 - £700 a month (or more; the flat pictured would cost WAY more than that per month!). Put together travel, food and utilities and the average musician does not have enough money to socialise. Cutting loose and detaching from the work environment is a great way to promote better sleep and mental-health. There is that desire to be close to London in order to be visible and local. So many musicians are overlooked if they are not within touching distance of the capital – the sight of the media and venues does not extend as far as it should! All of these elements, combined, is seeing musicians build their hopes up and dream; have those dreams eroded and return to a more ‘modest’ – and less desirable – existence. It is a vicious circle and stress that is making the issue around sleep even worse. The pressure of finance and living conditions exacerbates the issue; reduced sleep means the energy levels sap; the creative flow is limited and that can add to depression and anxiety – causing real problems and dangers. Maybe all of these issues are too weighty to deal with and cure; perhaps it is impossible to deal with every concern and create a perfect environment for a musician.

relax.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Pinterest

The modern music industry provides a chance for everyone to come in and get their work out to the people. The flip-side is the level of commitment needed from a musician; the amount of time the individual needs to spend on their work – and the effect it is having on their sleep/health. The less time they have for social activities (less money in their pocket) then the unhappier they will become. Of all the artists I have heard from; there is the feeling any ‘wasted hours’ – chilling or sleeping – will be detrimental to their success. We need to, therefore, break out of the head-space that puts this much pressure on the artist. Behind the digital screens and social media sites; there are few bodies and safeguards looking after the artist – whether they are rested enough and have adequate support. Many are lying awake wondering if they are good enough; if they have done enough and are worthy. I know medicines, exercise and designated time for socialisation is a good way of combating sleep issues but it is the pressures of success and physiological considerations that are hardest to treat. There is this perceived ideology social media success and streaming figures are the mark of success and popularity. The dwindling venues scene – so many great spots closing – and raising rent prices is putting fiduciary stress on the artist. Put all that together with growing mental-health concerns and it is putting so much pressure on musicians. I know it is not a simple fix but we need to realise how damaging a lack of sleep can be; how a pressurised music scene is creating more problems than productivity. There are benefits to a lack of sleep – it can lead to greater productivity – and rebalancing your sleeping habits means transposed priorities (getting more work done earlier in the day means you have time free in the evening) is a nice solution. I worry too many artists are burning out and sacrificing something as fundamental as a good night’s sleep to balance the demands of a music career. If we were able to create an industry where a musician felt less pressured and overworked; that would ease their minds and promote greater mental-health. It is a side of music we need to tackle and get to the roots of. If we do, and can prevent musicians giving up so much of their time and life; then that will create an environment where we place…

sleeps.jpg

BALANCE over obsession.

FEATURE: The Growing Rise in Sexism and Sexual Harassment Claims: Is It Only Limited to the Film Industry?!

FEATURE:

 

The Growing Rise in Sexism and Sexual Harassment Claims:

sarah.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sarah Silverman/PHOTO CREDIT: Ramona Rosales/August   

Is It Only Limited to the Film Industry?!

___________

A simple answer to that question…

hand.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Bustle/Getty

would be "no!". Although there have been numerous allegations made against figures in T.V. and film – we can naively sit back and say the music world will not be affected. I am going a bit off-piste and addressing the wider world of entertainment. I will, soon, bring in a couple of articles/interviews that look at the problems arising – and the figures who are fighting against sexual assault and sexism. I guess that is part of the problem: the women coming forward are victims of sexism and male machismo as much as anything. We cannot say this is a new phenomenon or something that has cropped up the past few years – a lot of the allegations are from years ago. The reason why I have sourced a photo (as the thumbnail) from The Guardian is because of the interview they conducted with Sarah Silverman – a comedian who has never been shy of making her voice heard and tackling wrongdoing. She does not specifically allude to controversies around people like Kevin Spacey and Harvey Weinstein: she looks at sexism and unequal rights/values affecting U.S. society; how more needs to be done to redress the ill – and how she, and her female peers, are an important part of the fight (and I really like the photo, too – hopefully, a lawsuit is not forthcoming!). Whilst figures such as Silverman – I shall come back to her in a bit – are providing inspiration and fuel: the likes of Morrissey are not helping things one iota! It seems, on the subject of sexism and sexual assault; women are adding sense and rationale: a lot of male interjection is either an unhelpful or insignificant maxim.

moz.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Morrissey/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

In the BBC article - it concerned an interview Morrissey conducted with the German newspaper, Der Spiegel - when asked about the allegations concerning Kevin Spacey – actor Anthony Rapp claims Spacey took advantage of him when he (Rapp) was fourteen – the former Smiths man stated:

"I don't know about you, but I was never in situations like this in my youth…I was always aware of what could happen. When you are in somebody's bedroom, you have to be aware of where that can lead to".

Morrissey is a musical genius, no doubt, but a bagpipe of bullsh*t when it comes to serious debate and controversial topics – he seems to put his foot in it and make everything worse! Moz, when talking about the allegations directed at Harvey Weinstein (and the assaults perpetrated), had this to say:

"Afterwards, they feel embarrassed or disliked. And then they turn it around and say: 'I was attacked, I was surprised'.

"But if everything went well, and if it had given them a great career, they would not talk about it."

"I hate rape... But in many cases, one looks at the circumstances and thinks that the person who is considered a victim is merely disappointed."

The interview also saw Morrissey talk about the ‘tradition’ of musicians having sex with their groupies – something that was seen as commonplace (although he was, obviously, not involved with that as part of The Smiths).

saz.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sarah Silverman/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

I will come to cover-girl Sarah Silverman – and her interview with The Guardian – as she has a very healthy and mature approach to the likes of Harvey Weinstein and what we can do to stem the issue. I think a lot of the allegations coming out concern events that happened a number of years ago – does this mean there are far fewer cases of sexual abuse and molestation in the entertainment industry today?! It seems, with high-profile cases in the U.S., the seedy log of sh*t that has been festered for years is in no danger of subsiding. It may seem, from the outside, like a few privileged creatives not knowing any better – doing things they consider normal and, only now, realising that it was inappropriate. Jeffrey Tambor, star of Amazon’s hit show, Transparent, has left the show after claims were made of misconduct and sexual assault – he took the decision to leave; fearing the claims would see him sacked. From comedians, actors and producers; we are seeing new revelations and accusations come to light. I wanted to write this piece and discuss two things: why the issues are not reserved to film/T.V. – and will be a problem in music – and why men need to do more to counteract the issue. It seems the male chromosomes have been rather cowardly and shy. It is not a battle-of-the-sexes, here: men are causing the issue and, even if a high-profile figure is not culpable and under suspicion, they should feel the need and duty to attack their peers!

tam.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Jeffrey Tambor/PHOTO CREDIT: January Images/Rex/Shutterstock 

Silence does not exculpate them: it does show a culture of fear and acceptance is creeping in. Is it okay to say nothing and assume, as some do, these allegations are either exaggerated or concerned with a practice that was concerned normal back then?! Even though the likes of Tambor and Spacey have expressed regret and repulsion – the fact they were found out after being accused means there is a deep-down problem that needs eradicating. People knew better back then: it is not acceptable to say things were different and they knew no better. That does not wash with racism, domestic assault and bigotry: it is definitely not the case when it comes to sexual inappropriateness and assault. Whilst more claims are coming to light – and stars from across the entertainment world are being outed and facing heavy penalty – I am not hearing a lot of male input! Where are the contemporaries offering condemnation and disgust?! Actors like Matt Damon have been accused of aiding and shielding figures like Harvey Weinstein – the Borne actor remaining quiet when he knew, full well, what was happening at the time. Most of the aggrieved and emotional proclamations coming from the news are from women: the vast majority, in fact! If I were in a position of influence and discovered someone in my field has committed such crimes; I would be out there and offer nothing but judgement at the accused.

spacey.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Kevin Spacey

It is positive seeing women coming forward and revealing these men for who they are – the fact they felt they could not come forward before suggests there is a lot of fear; maybe they would not be believed?! I think the music industry is in a volatile position at the moment – in the sense, I know there are incidents like this (Weinstein, Spacey etc.) that are not being reported. We know there is a massive amount of sexism in the music industry and, hand-in-hand with that, there are men who feel they can get away with assaulting female artists – because they are in a position of ‘respect’ and authority. Maybe there are different dynamics in the music industry – compared to the relationships one finds on sets and in studios. For an actress; she would work very closely with a director/producer – often taking directing that involved physical contact and intimacy – and that, in turn, leads to that director/producer taking things too far – assuming that is allowed and consensual. Male actors would, obviously, find themselves in close proximity to a female co-star. The fact this expressive and untamed approach to human contact continued off-set is the result of ego and ignorance – their cachet means they can get away with it and the woman wants it. Perhaps there are a few claims that are slightly overwrought and misunderstood – where do we draw the line and how do we define what is inappropriate and acceptable?

touch.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Irina Munteanu 

Obviously, laying on top of someone and forcing yourself on them is degrading and immoral; pinching a woman’s bottom and making lurid advances is despicable and illegal. Is, therefore, something like a misplaced hand on the knee or an innocent sexual comment less serious? Are we talking about semantics and should we be a little more open-minded and tolerant when it comes to relatively ‘minor’ incidents? I feel every accusation/claim is not equal but every one of them is important and warranted. Bringing this back to music and I have witnessed, first-hand, directors (for music videos) advance on female artists and make suggestions few would argue are connected to the process of making a video. I have read new stories where female Pop artists have been assaulted and raped by producers and colleagues. We are all sage and observant enough to realise a woman’s need for sexual expression and liberation is not an open invitation for men to assault and abuse them. Even if a Popstar (other genres are available!) deliberately and provocatively exposes flesh in order to shift a few units – they are not asking to be touched, assaulted and taken advantage of! I am part of the camp who feels we need to look at sexuality in music and whether videos/photoshoots, in some cases, are sending bad messages to young and impressionable listeners – young girls thinking the way to get ahead in the world is showing their breasts and showing as much skin as they can.

Bey.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Beyoncé/PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

As I said, just now: artists like Beyoncé and Katy Perry – a distinction in intentions and severity – are showing spirit and confidence in their body; promoting their femininity and trying to inspire young women – they are strong and passionate figures who will not be cowed and seen as second-class citizens. I have been watching unfolding events (in the media) and seeing various stars admitting indiscretion and wrongdoing. I know there are equivalent issues in music but, right now, there are very few cases coming into the spotlight. The working dynamic and logarithms of the music world are not comparable to those of acting – artists/bands tend to work alone and have relatively little contact (physical) with a producer/director. Even though there are fewer opportunities for latent abuse of power – and blatant sexual assault – that does not mean the issue is moot. Far from it, in fact! I have written extensively on sexual imbalance and sexism in the music industry. From the male-dominated major festival headliners to the sweaty studios; the high positions and management roles in record labels – it is a veritable sausage-factory! I am seeing changes where more women are being recognised and studios are opening their doors/minds to female involvement – it is a minor change that does not go far enough. As we are seeing more and more cases of sexual assault in the entertainment issue; I wonder whether music should be more aware of the skeletons in its closest. I have heard/read about incidents where female artists have been assaulted by a male peer/producer.

images.jpg

IMAGE CREDIT: Pinterest

There have been even more cases whereby a female artist has been touched inappropriately or subjected to vile abuse and sexism – not only from those within the industry but fans/those who attend their gigs. If many male figures in film/T.V. are standing silently by as their associates collude and squirm – should music, A) unearth and expose sexual assaults present within its walls and, B) ensure its men – those not guilty of these offences – provide stern and unwavering finger-pointing at those who are in the wrong? I would say so and, the more we overlook and do not act, the more that will fester and fart. I will come back to this in a bit – because I want to draw a very striking line through each sector of the entertainment industry; drill down to the nub of my discourse – but, as promised, a look at the recent Sarah Silverman interview. In a candid and intriguing interview; Silverman was asked to give her views on the Weinstein accusations. The Guardian’s Sophie Heawood revealed more:

"The Harvey Weinstein scandal broke a fortnight before we met, and has been growing ever since, with daily news of further rapes and assaults across the industry. I point out that this has been a horrible two weeks for women in Hollywood. “No,” replies Silverman, still smiling. “It’s probably been the best two weeks for women in Hollywood ever. It’s a better two weeks than the silence of the past. I mean it’s finally exposing it. The enabled fucking monsters are gonna think twice now. And that’s what it’s all about,” she says. “Be scared,” she adds, addressing the exploiters. She asks me what today’s latest developments are, because, “It’s crazy, working on the show I can only catch up on the news at night so I end up sitting on the side of my bathtub, just scrolling.”

Rather than wholeheartedly scorn and attack Weinstein: Silverman suggested it was not so much a case of exonerating these men but understanding why they commit these acts in the first place. Weinstein is, as she says, a ‘monster’; but one who felt he could get away with assaulting females in his industry without ramifications. As Silverman revealed:

SARS.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Sarah Silverman/PHOTO CREDIT: Ramona Rosales/August

I’m not trying to have empathy for Harvey Weinstein, he’s clearly a monster, but monsters are made. Listen, we spent the past 60 years, especially Jews, trying to figure out the pathology of a Hitler. So to understand someone’s pathology is not a waste of time.” She has wanted to join in with #metoo, “but I didn’t want to pull away from it because so many maniacs from the far right jump on me when I say my stuff. It’s not that I need to be heard on this – I just would want to add my voice – but I wondered if maybe that would be unhelpful.”

Silverman, herself, had exposure – maybe that is the wrong choice of words! – to workplace sexism and inappropriateness…

The first penis she ever saw belonged to her boss when she was an 18-year-old waitress in her native New Hampshire. He called her into his office “and I was literally shaking, thinking I was in trouble, but he was just asking me benign questions – until I saw that he was fully jerking off in front of me. And I just said…” her voice fades to a whimper: ‘I have to clean the popcorn machine,’ and I left and I never told anyone. For years. But of course those guys know who to pick on. They don’t pick on me now.”

grimes2.jpg

IN THIS PHOTO: Grimes (who has been the subject of sexism and unwanted sexual advances)/PHOTO CREDIT: Teen Vogue

The point of sourcing this interview – and a couple of photos – was not to make my journalism more credible and stronger by proximity: I wanted to bring in a very strong and brave voice; a guide for women who have experienced the same problems. Maybe Morrissey’s bell-ended approach to sexuality and morals are, unsurprisingly misinformed and inexperienced – not a man who has been in a position to refuse or pursue many women – but he has acid a face-full of dirt to the argument. I am either seeing men commit great (in the pejorative sense) acts of repugnance; sit dormant and feel obliged to report such transgressions – those affiliated with these perpetrators turn a blind eye and, in some occurrences, feel nothing wrong has happened. Music is not an industry that can wash its hands and get through airport security without a thorough cavity search. There are more tumours, crooked teeth and festering boils on the body of the industry than there is anywhere else – the film industry and music world would give a pretty close battle when it comes to sexism and who is the greatest (again: regarding pejoratives) offender. I would argue music is a far more pitiful climate regarding sexism and abuse – in the sense many women do not feel they would be listened to and believed; a lot of incidents are being silenced and smothered. I know, from music videos and photo-shoots, there is inappropriate touching (from men); producers caught out and putting their hands where they have no business; male music gig-goers inappropriate in theory conduct; male musicians taking things too far and assuming a smile or affectionate word gives them carte blanch to do as they please.

lip.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Alberto Oritz/Flicker

It is not only sexual assault but sexism, that concerns me: I am seeing incidents of sexism occur in every corner of the industry. Every week, when I get a slew of interview requests, you can guarantee the majority of them concern male artists. I know full well there are as many female artists as men but they are not being provided attention and publicity. I get sick of the raft of male artists but cannot refuse – or I would not have any work to do! Not only are many (of the male examples) samey, dull and unengaging: I have to circumvent P.R. companies and approach THEIR female artists myself! The fact I actively have to search for female artists shows there is rampant sexism throughout the music industry. It is not the case the men are better or more popular – far from it – but it is seen as normal to put them first and provide less attention to their female clients/artists. How interlinked is this ignorance to the presumption (among men in the industry who commit acts of sexual abuse) to the feeling women are inferior and unworthy?! There is not a lot I can do – the fact I am being bombarded with requests for male artists annoys me now – but, whilst the entertainment sector is seeing a rise in sexual abuse allegations, music needs to be accountable and take things more seriously. We all know it is a hugely sexist industry but there is very little being done by those (men) in power. Those in prominent positions need to get off their arses and assuming the music industry will not suffer the same problems as those we have seen in film and T.V. – allegations and incidents will come to light; it is only a matter of time. If we have learnt anything from recent events – and taken to heart words by the likes of Sarah Silverman – then it is clear, now more than ever, that…

protest.jpg

PHOTO CREDIT: Getty

CHANGES need to be made!